Susan Brown, Jeffrey G. Brown's Wife real picture
Tom Shelly, White God
and run off usenet.
Jason James
"Tom Shelly, White God" <Tom_Shelly...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:84gc7vsd4nl2o32dl...@4ax.com...
> Repost of that triumphant day when Jeffrey Goehring Brown was exposed
> and run off usenet.
>
> http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=4958
To the contrary, JGB does not respond to attacks on third parties. I would
not be surprised if he simply desisted to stop the 'below the belt' tactics
you and your lot use, out of respect for those third parties.
Jason James
Black Knight
> and run off usenet.
>
> http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=4958
Is that how you "win debates", you filthy scum?
Jason James
"Publius Ovidius Naso" <jamesk...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:06tc7v0utiohkc3kj...@4ax.com...
You are the one to bring up that practice.
Jason James
> --
> "Islam is a religion in which God requires you to send your son to
> die for him."
> "Christianity is a faith in which God sent his Son to die for you."
>
> Very Respectfully
>
> James Kohegan
> jamesk...@yahoo.com
> accept no substitutes
>
> Ave America, Ave Imperator
> Get used to it.
> Come and visit
> http://www.geocities.com/jameskohegan/
Steve Cipoletti
" Jason James" <strato...@bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:ujsda.2400$dE2....@newsfeeds.bigpond.com...
JGB was far too arrogant to respect others. Try another angle.
>
> Jason James
>
>
Tom Shelly, White God
<strato...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>To the contrary, JGB does not respond to attacks on third parties. I would
>not be surprised if he simply desisted to stop the 'below the belt' tactics
>you and your lot use, out of respect for those third parties.
>
>Jason James
I have many examples of JGB responding to attacks on third parties.
Would you like to see them?
And I have many examples of JGB using 'below the belt' tactics too.
I will post examples of them both if you promise to apologize first.
(I'm holding my breath)
Tom Shelly, White God
Jason James
"Steve Cipoletti" <St...@politicallyincorrect.com> wrote in message
news:b566ct$akn$3...@ngspool-d02.news.aol.com...
Check his posts, he never responded to attacks on third parties or attacked
third parties.
> > Jason James
> >
> >
>
>
Tom Shelly, White God
wrote:
>Is that how you "win debates", you filthy scum?
No. not at all.
Here's how I won debates against Jeffrey.
HUMILIATION #1
Jeffrey snips only part of a message to attempt to win and is exposed
and humiliated
as a liar.:
THIS PROVES THE POINT THAT NIGGERS COMMIT MORE CRIMES THAN WHITES.
False. According to the 'Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
1999', table
4.10, there were 248,120 whites arrested and charged for violent
offenses in
1999, versus 162,264 blacks for the same period. Over 50% of the
violent
crime
in the United States is committed by whites.
'Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1999':
<http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/>
My post proving total humiliation of Jeffrey G. Brown:
Dumbass Jeffrey G. Brown loses!
Lying coward Jeffrey G. Brown likes to take sentences out of
context...
Let's repost the sentence with the part he left out:
THIS IS HORRIFYING WHEN YOU TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THAT NIGGERS ARE ONLY
12%
OF THE U.S. POPULATION. BY HER OWN POST, PER 1000 VIOLENT CRIMES, 35
ARE NIGGER VICTIMS AND 27 ARE WHITE (TOP PARAGRAPH) . IF YOU COMBINE
THAT WITH THE INFORMATION IN THE PARAGRAPH JUST ABOVE, THAT MEANS
THAT
OUT OF THE 62 VIOLENT CRIMES, 35.78 WERE COMMITED BY NIGGERS. THAT IS
OVER HALF OF THE VIOLENT CRIMES COMMITED AGAINST WHITES AND NIGGERS
WERE
COMMITED BY NIGGERS! ASTOUNDING WHEN YOU CONSIDER THEIR POPULATION IN
THE U.S. IS AROUND 12%!
UNWITTINGLY, NIGGER URINAL MAKES A FOOL OF HERSELF AND BY HER
INABILITY
TO UNDERSTAND SIMPLE STATISTICAL DATA, PROVED THAT NIGGERS COMMIT OVER
50% OF THE VIOLENT CRIME IN THE U.S. WHILE BEING ONLY 12% OF THE
POPULATION!
Since Jeffrey only posted a part of the message, which he is prone to
do, he makes one believe that I was submitting that niggers commit
over
50% of the crime in the U.S. when in fact, I was drawing a correct
interpretation of the statistical data that urinal had posted. Not
only
that
but the lying nigger lover omits the fact that niggers are only around
12%
of the population in the U.S. so per capita, they overwhelmingly
commit more crimes than Whites.
The lying coward Jeffrey Brown attempt to win arguments by not only
posting a small part of the message, but by making assumptions upon
the
authors.
This is typical of a nigger lover who can not debate racists and win.
To me,,,this thread is over. Jeffrey has run from every challenge and
is afraid of the facts.
Watch the coward run.
This thread is over. YOu lose Jeffrey.
Tom
HUMILIATION #2
Another poster noted the same thing about Jeffrey and busted him and
exposed him
to be a liar too.
Out of context quotes to satisfy his lack of debate skills:
Path:
typhoon.tampabay.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!news-west.rr.com!cyclone.kc.
rr.com!news.kc.rr.com!news-east.rr.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!canoe.uoregon.ed
u!logbridge.uoregon.edu!paloalto-snh1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.alt.net!jg
_brown
From: "Jeffrey G. Brown" <jg_b...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups:
balt.general,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.flame.niggers,nyc.general
Subject: Re: Here's the facts on "Jasper" the comedian
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 11:29:47 -0500
Organization: none
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <jg_brown-CB29C5...@news.alt.net>
References: <993c23bc9656902b...@mix.winterorbit.com>
<3BEC8612...@anonymous.net> <3BEDDDD3...@UpYours.com>
<7YnH7.56238$zK1.14...@typhoon.tampabay.rr.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
Xref: cyclone.tampabay.rr.com balt.general:29196
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1109564 alt.flame.niggers:471920
nyc.general:73878
In article <7YnH7.56238$zK1.14...@typhoon.tampabay.rr.com>, "Jasper
Drag
Racing" <wh...@one.criminal.becomes.saint> wrote:
> If you of course have the moxy to ever say anything
That's funny! A gutless bigot posting from behind a pseudonym,
lecturing
the
rest of us on "moxy".
Thanks for the laugh, cretin...
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown
jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study",
1997
-------------------->>>>>><<<<<-------------------------
The message he butchered up to make his little witty set of one liners
as he
runs with his aging 1960's punk ass tail between his legs:
Path:
typhoon.tampabay.rr.com!cyclone.tampabay.rr.com!news-post.tampabay.rr.com!ty
phoon.tampabay.rr.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Reply-To: "Jasper Drag Racing" <wh...@one.criminal.becomes.saint>
From: "Jasper Drag Racing" <LongC...@and.hioctane>
Newsgroups:
balt.general,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.flame.niggers,nyc.general
References: <993c23bc9656902b...@mix.winterorbit.com>
<3BEC8612...@anonymous.net> <3BEDDDD3...@UpYours.com>
Subject: Re: Here's the facts on the real terrorists
Lines: 93
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <7YnH7.56238$zK1.14...@typhoon.tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 05:24:19 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.26.59.4
X-Complaints-To: ab...@rr.com
X-Trace: typhoon.tampabay.rr.com 1005456259 24.26.59.4 (Sun, 11 Nov
2001
00:24:19 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 00:24:19 EST
Organization: RoadRunner - Central Florida
Xref: cyclone.tampabay.rr.com balt.general:29177
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:1109309 alt.flame.niggers:471834
nyc.general:73837
Remember, it was rabid peace loving leftists who burned down ROTC
offices on
campuses around the country in the 60's and these rabid punks from our
hoodlum hatcheries we still call colleges and universities are not
contempt
with just that, they would love to burn down everyone else's
neighborhood
(except of course their own) to enforce their "ideals" on everyone
else.
If
you of course have the moxy to ever say anything contraire to their
policies, then you must be a nazi, racist, nativist or xenophobe, or
someother dribble.
Fill in the blanks for names I missed below mr./mrs. liberal
"intellectual"
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
HUMILIATION #3
This is the best, Jeffrey's address and phone number and website:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001 22:58:19 GMT, <3bf2f6b9...@news.erols.com>
bro...@removethis.erols.com (Roger Brown) wrote:
>Who is Jeffrey?
Jeffrey G. Brown
8357 Summitridge
Cincinnati, OH 45255
513-474-1953
The above is really him as I proved in this post:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=1&selm=fbtrlt0ruv16av2o8ne019e14ebj990oad%404ax.com
From: Doc Tavish (doc_t...@my-deja.comDELETE2MAIL-NO-SPAM)
Subject: Jeffrey G. Brown Has Been Successfully Outed and Edeiken's
Invasion of
Privacy and Lies aka Re: [snip] = JEFFERY G BROWN
Message-ID: <fbtrlt0ruv16av2o8...@4ax.com>
Date: 2001-07-24 16:40:37 PST
EXCERPT:
>> You guys need to get your stories lined up. First you insist Jeffrey
G.
>> Brown is not his real name, the you insist he doesn't live in
>> Cincinnati, then you post an address and phone number in Cincy and
say
>> it is "Jeffrey G. Brown."
:
>I decided to verify the above. It was easy to do.
>
>jeff_...@pol.com (check usenet for the 1000's of post from the mid
>90's) = owner of Rent-a-geek according to pol.com own website =
>website www.geekman.com = Jeff Brown = whois geekman.com
>
>Consider the story lined up and since Brown has never hesitated in
>posting personal information about people including their children, I
>don't feel sorry for him.
Just look at this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=13&selm=4b01d3580b2ff31f8b0ff1a2607f3864%40anon.xg.nu
From: No User (no....@anon.xg.nu)
Subject: Jeffrey G. Brown Address
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
View complete thread (48 articles)
Date: 2000-12-15 21:28:13 PST
Go to the link and click: "View complete thread (48 articles)" to
watch
Jeffrey
do a dance to try to deflect that he was outed. Truly funny. A lot
more
funnier
than when he posted my real name about four years ago! I'm still
laughing my ass
off about seeing Jeffrey has a company called rent-a-geek. I guess his
real name
is Jeffrey Geek Brown. Obviously he runs his "geek" business from his
residence
and has a separate line for business calls.
Here is more proof that Jeffrey Geek Brown is "our" troll:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_uauthors=alph...@GEEKMAN.COM&num=20
Using the e-mail address <alph...@GEEKMAN.COM> as AUTHOR at
<http://groups.google.com/advanced_group_search> guess whose
posts show up? Jeffrey G. Brown's! Everyone go look!
Here is what I got:
Related groups
alt.politics.nationalism.white.* (1 group)
comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.misc
alt.politics.equality
Searched Groups for author:alph...@GEEKMAN.COM Results 1 - 10 of
10. Search
took 0.86 seconds.
Liar Philllips' "three scientists" go down in flames
Whenever is that manufacturer and automation shyly? Wrangler lashes
hypertrophied among your lucky neutralization, plus the veritable,
commentary
... alt.politics.nationalism.white - 07 Oct 1999 by Jeffrey G. Brown -
View
Thread (122 articles)
The above post was one of those posts the enemies of free speech
posted
in large
quantities for over a year to drown out alt.revisionism. Don't even
bother
looking!
This post has the meat! Jeffrey G. Brown is outed!
DUN Dialing Partial Phone Number
Gentlebeings: I am having exceptional difficulty in configuring a
friend's
computer to access a local ISP using Dial-Up Networking. Herewith my
tale ...
microsoft.public.win95.dialupnetwork - 18 Feb 1998 by Jeffrey G. Brown
-
View
Thread (1 article)
Here is the post above in full and notice the sig line too!
From: Jeffrey G. Brown (alph...@geekman.com)
Subject: DUN Dialing Partial Phone Number
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.win95.dialupnetwork,
comp.os.ms-windows.networking.ras, comp.os.ms-windows.networking.win95
Date: 1998/02/18
Gentlebeings:
I am having exceptional difficulty in configuring a friend's computer
to
access a local ISP using Dial-Up Networking. Herewith my tale of woe:
Initially the system would dial the ISP, the modems would connect, and
then
the 'Verifying user ID and password' window would hang out on the
screen
for a looong time. Finally, we would get the error message "Cannot
start
verifying user name and password". Clicking Cancel would result in a
disconnect after what must have been a minute or more.
I then uninstalled Compuserve 3.02 (having heard that it can sometimes
be
the cause of such troubles). Retested DUN, no joy. Uninstalled DUN
1.2,
installed the Winsock update patch and DUN 1.2b. Now, the modem only
dials
the first one or two digits of the phone number and quits!
The internal Acer modem behaves itself in HyperTerminal, and the
Diagnostics panel in the Modem control panel device shows
communications
with the modem is hunky-dorey. I am at wit's end. Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance...
JGB
======================================================================
Rent-A-Geek Internet Training, PC & Mac Troubleshooting
alph...@geekman.com http://www.geekman.com 513-474-1953
^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^
~~End of EXACT GOOGLE Archive~~
BTW the GEEKMAN.COM domain is registered to Jeffrey G. Brown as shown
here:
http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi
Registrant:
Rent-A-Geek (GEEKMAN-DOM)
8357 Summitridge
Cincinnati, OH 45255
Domain Name: GEEKMAN.COM
Administrative Contact, Billing Contact:
Brown, Jeff (BJ130-ORG) alph...@GEEKMAN.COM
Rent-A-Geek
8357 Summitridge
Cincinnati, OH 45255 US
513.474.1953
Fax- 513.474.9678
<end>
Re: Jewish Genocide v. Christianity
In the Soviet Union, the communist party, run mostly for the benefit
of
its
Jewish founders who made up approximately 90% of the founding fathers
...
alt.politics.equality - 29 Jul 1997 by Jeffrey G. Brown - View Thread
(2
articles)
Re: What makes a person white? - Or, how a person can be ...
I don't recall stating facial angle and cephalic index were the be-all
and
end-all, in fact I said the opposite. So Cuckoobrain ...
alt.politics.white-power - 29 Jul 1997 by Jeffrey G. Brown - View
Thread
(7
articles)
Re: What makes a person white?
says... In article <5regqg$s...@fridge-nf0.shore.net>,
allan_m...@bigfoot.com
says... [The usual Matthews bullshit snipped] This is BobbyKens ...
alt.politics.white-power - 29 Jul 1997 by Jeffrey G. Brown - View
Thread
(27
articles)
Re: European Right To Survival
2. Whites are the victim of government genocidal programs to reduce us
to mere
minorities in our own nation. We're still waiting for Weltner to ...
alt.politics.equality - 28 Jul 1997 by Jeffrey G. Brown - View Thread
(2
articles)
Here is the above post in full detail:
From: Jeffrey G. Brown (alph...@geekman.com)
Subject: Re: European Right To Survival
Newsgroups: alt.politics.equality
View complete thread (2 articles)
Date: 1997/07/28
In article <peterose-280...@news.anet-stl.com>,
pete...@usa.net
(NO European Genocide, aka Frank Weltner) wrote:
> 2. Whites are the victim of government genocidal programs to reduce us
to
> mere minorities in our own nation.
We're still waiting for Weltner to provide any evidence that actual
'genocide' is taking place.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Need I say more?
Doc Tavish
--
Scott, your postured indignation impresses no one. With your
obvious penis fetish, you're quite obviously either:
a) a teenager who needs a girlfriend;
b) impotent; or my favorite,
c) both.
Andrew Mathis
P.S. If you *are* underaged, by the way, I'd be more than happy to
meet you in a coffee shop as opposed to a place that serves alcohol.
-From: aem...@is2.nyu.edu
-Subject: Re: Jeffrey G. Brown Accuses BUT Can't Back His Charges..
-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 01:25:30 GMT
-Message-ID: <6t9u6a$o7u$1...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
HUMILIATION #4
Jeffrey posts non-working link proving that his 'facts' are total
bullshit.
Then he attempts to argue and finally admits it.
Compliments of Jasper
"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:jeffreygbrown-427...@news.alt.net...
> In article <3BF6406D...@earthlink.net>, "Tommyrot Shelly, White
Numbskull"
> <toms...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > NIGGERS COMMIT OVER > 50% OF THE VIOLENT CRIME IN THE U.S.
>
> False. According to the 'Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1999',
table
> 4.10, there were 248,120 whites arrested and charged for violent offenses
in
> 1999, versus 162,264 blacks for the same period. Over 50% of the violent
crime
> in the United States is committed by whites.
>
> 'Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1999':
> <http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/>
>
> JGB
found under Section 4-Characteristics and Distribution of Persons
Arrested
"The page you requested cannot be located. Please try the following:
Check the URL and try again (remember case matters!)
Try using the site index on our main page
If you have found a broken link on our site, please report it, listing
the
address of the link, your email address, and a description of the
information that you are trying to locate. "
So not only does Jeffrey list a URL whose title conflicts with the
statistics that he says it provides (1999 vs 1995), but the link leads
to a
'page not found'.
HAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAAAAAAAAA
Jeffrey, you have been exposed !
Have a nice day !
Here he admits it:
"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:jeffreygbrown-7D7...@news.alt.net...
>
> The text 'Section 4' link is bad, yes.
"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:jeffreygbrown-31B...@news.alt.net...
> In article <PYEJ7.381$wf.40...@news2.randori.com>, "Jasper Pick-up,
Chain,
> and Towing, Ltd." <jpuc&tc@ aol.com> wrote:
>
> > from Jeffrey the invalid link poster
>
> We're still waiting for "Jasper" the imbecile to cite the article in which
I
> posted an "invalid link".
>
Here, you go, lil Jeffy:
>"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
>news:jeffreygbrown-427...@news.alt.net...
>>
>> 'Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1999':
>> <http://www.albany.edu/sourcebook/1995/>
>>
>> JGB
>found under Section 4-Characteristics and Distribution of Persons Arrested
>"The page you requested cannot be located. "
>So not only does Jeffrey list a URL whose title conflicts with the
>statistics that he says it provides (1999 vs 1995), but the link leads to a
>'page not found'.
That is the classic definition of an invalid link....one that leads to
a
'page not found' error message.
Jeffrey, you have, once again, been exposed for the intellectually
bankrupt
person that you are!
Have a nice day !
HUMILIATION #5
Jeffrey the invalid-link poster, who claims that he never did it, and
whose
only response to multiple postings of this evidence is 'prove I posted
an
invalid link'.
Jeffrey the word-parser, who will now claim that his original 'link'
was
valid, and ignore the fact that links within that site (which,
incidentally,
lead to the information sought), are not valid.
Jeffrey, who claims that 'there is a valid link further down the
page', but
fails to post THAT URL.
Jeffery the cowardly whigger apologist, who hasn't the courage to post
the
INFORMATION from whatever page he claims contradicts Tom's original
claim,
because he knows it will prove him to be in the wrong.
But, then, you can't post data that doesn't exist, so perhaps we can
excuse
him, after all, when a whigger apologist gets backed into a corner,
all he
can do is make excuses.
HUMILIATION #6
Jeffrey likes to use 'cut and snip' tactics to make people think he is
winning a debate but doesn't
like it when people do it to him. In fact, he even says that doing it
makes them a liar.
Therefore, since Jeffrey uses the same tactic (as proven above) he is
proving that
he considers himself a liar.
Here's the thread:
JGB shows us his true colors when he posted the following:
Yes, blacks....make bigotry justifiable.
mommy....is-doing-it...around age eight or so. Bigots......really
become capaple of
reasoning like an adult.
JGB
There it is! He posted it..He is a proven bigot now.
My challenge to JGB..the nigger loving punching bag of AFN:
PROVE that you didn't post that. I have proof you did.
Tom Shelly, White God ®
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist Award, 2002
Jeffrey responds by posting the entire thread of his post that I
snipped:
In article <3BF77B89...@earthlink.net>, "Tom Shelly, White Fool"
<toms...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> [...deletia: incoherent...]
From: "Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame.niggers
Subject: Re: A challenge to wiggers
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 21:02:15 -0500
Message-ID: <jeffreygbrown-BB0...@news.alt.net>
In article <1OiJ7.200458$YL3.61...@news3.rdc1.on.home.com>, "R
Grainger"
<bluegu...@nappy.net> wrote:
> "Confirmed coward and AFN punching bag, Jeffrey G. Brown"
> <jeffre...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
> news:jeffreygbrown-A13...@news.alt.net...
> > In article <3BF46FC9...@earthlink.net>, Tommyrot Shelly
> > <toms...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> > > If I walked down the street and saw a black man coming, I would be more
> > > concerned that he was going to rob or mug me than a White person. That
> > > doesn't make me 'racist'. That simply means that I am reacting to the
> > > FACT that blacks commit more crimes per capita than Whites. That black
> > > is many times more likely to rob me than a White person. That is a
> > > fact (see statistics below).
> > >
> > > Does that make me a racist
> >
> > Yup.
> >
> > You're prejudging an individual about whom you know nothing, save the
> > color of his skin.
>
> "There is nothing more painful to me ... than to walk down the street and
> hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery--then look around
> and see somebody white and feel relieved."
> --Jesse Jack$on, 12/17/93, admitting *he* practices racial profiling!
Yes, blacks can also be bigots -- even against their own kind. That
doesn't make
bigotry justifiable.
"R Grainger" appears to be using the
'but-mommy-everybody-else-is-doing-it'
gambit. Most of us learn that said gambit is indefensible around age
eight or
so. Bigots, of course, never really become capable of reasoning like
an adult.
I thank "R Grainger" for being such an illustrative example of the
cognition
problems so prevalent amongst its kind.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown
jeffre...@mailandnews.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study",
1997
I responded with a taunting message to manipulate him into the
response that I desired:
Proof from the coward, punching-bag Jeffrey (rent a geek) Brown!
There it is!
He admits it. He posted:
Yes, blacks....make bigotry justifiable.
mommy....is-doing-it...around age eight or so. Bigots......really
become capaple of
reasoning like an adult.
JGB
Now we all know.
Tom Shelly, White God ®
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist Award, 2002
And just as expected, Jeffrey responds and humiliates himself by
calling himself a liar
for using the cut and snip tactics that he employs regularly:
In article <3BF80DBB...@earthlink.net>, "Tommyrot Shelly, White
Imbecile"
<toms...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> [...deletia...]
> Now we all know.
Now we all know just how dishonest "Tommyrot" can be.
Slam dunk, Jeffrey defeated and humiliated.
HUMILIATION #7
Jeffrey is unable to understand simple percentages and the term 'per
capita' and
'more likely'. Like niggers, he ignores his third grade math lessons.
(note the percentages here are false. The crime statistics are much
worse for
blacks. They actually commit over 50% of certain violent crimes in
the U.S. while being
only around 12% of the population)
So 12.7% of the population (blacks) are committing 28.6% of violent
> crime and 82.4% of the population (whites) are committing 69.0% of
> violent crime.
That's right, imbecile.
Whites commit by far the majority of crime. If you were interested in
reducing
crime, you'd concentrate your attention on whites -- white men, to be
precise.
But reducing crime isn't what you are interested in, is it, coward?
JGB
HUMILIATION #8
Even after publicly exposed for his cut and snip tactics. He still
clings
to his cut and snip tactics and actually defends them in the light
of proof:
Jeffrey message: first line is a quote from my previous message:
You are cutting and snipping the post I originally made to make it
seem
> as if I posted that information when in fact I did not.
False.
Tommyrot wrote the claim that "NIGGERS COMMIT OVER 50% OF THE VIOLENT
CRIME IN
THE U.S."
It even apologized for using all caps.
"Tommyrot" is lying -- again.
JGB
Jeffrey's lies are easy to expose.
Here's the part he left off when he cut and snipped the message:
UNWITTINGLY, NIGGER URINAL MAKES A FOOL OF HERSELF AND BY HER
INABILITY
TO UNDERSTAND SIMPLE STATISTICAL DATA, PROVED THAT NIGGERS
COMMIT OVER
50% OF THE VIOLENT CRIME IN THE U.S. WHILE BEING ONLY 12% OF THE
POPULATION!
Obviously, my message was taunting her with the fact that she
unwittingly proved the
opposite of what she was trying to say.
Notice how Jeffrey only posts part of it:
NIGGERS COMMIT OVER
50% OF THE VIOLENT CRIME IN THE U.S. WHILE BEING ONLY 12% OF THE
POPULATION!
Making it seem as if I was asserting that rather than actually saying:
UNWITTINGLY, NIGGER URINAL MAKES A FOOL OF HERSELF AND BY HER
INABILITY
TO UNDERSTAND SIMPLE STATISTICAL DATA, PROVED THAT NIGGERS
COMMIT OVER
50% OF THE VIOLENT CRIME IN THE U.S. WHILE BEING ONLY 12% OF THE
POPULATION!
Jeffrey is easy to expose and bring his lies to light. This is
humiliation number 6.
Slam Dunk
Tom Shelly, White God ®
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist Award, 2002
HUMILIATION #9
Now, Jeffrey ignores the meaning of the cut and snip post and in his
defense, posts:
Oh, look...
Tommyrot has suddenly abandoned its "NIGGERS COMMIT OVER 50% OF THE
VIOLENT
CRIME IN THE U.S." lie.
Gee, I wonder why...
JGB
When in fact he knows that he merely cut and snipped a post (as proved
in humiliation number 8 wherein I proved that nigger
urinal's information proved that niggers commit over 50% of the
violent crime in the U.S.
HUMILIATION #10
After losing a flame war with Joe Schmoe on AFN, Jeffrey challenges
him to meet him
at Burger King and as expected, Jeffrey gets scared and doesn't show
up:
Heres Jeffrey's post telling me that he will meet me in cincinnati:
"I'll be eating lunch this Friday at 12:30 PM at the Burger King at
9640 S
Mason
Montgomery Road in Mason. If you think you can find the place, you're
welcome to
join me, gutless bigot.
Oh, one thing: I don't dine with anonymous cowards. Be prepared to
show a
legitimate photo ID.
JGB"
Of course upon my arrival at 12:20 JiGaBoo was nowhere in site,i went
and
asked these 4 niggers who were sitting in a booth staring at me if
they knew
who JGB was,of course they said they didnt know,but then again if your
a
nigger being asked a question by a 6'7" 250lb white man with a
swastica
tattoo on the side of his neck and hair damn near down to the floor
your
gonna deny knowing JGB anyways.
I waited til 1:00,still no JGB,but of course i always knew he wouldnt
dare
show up,he cowards away in the NG and does so in real life too and
then
calls us all cowards for not signing our names LoL
where were you JiGaBoo??
Incredibly, when Jeffrey was supposed to be meeting Joe Schmoe,
he was posting to the newsgroup, proving that he chickened out:
# 1
From: Jeffrey G Brown
Subject: RE: The idiocy of work, work, work
11:22 AM
11/17/2001
# 2
From: Jeffrey G. Brown
Subject:RE:Gee, where did Jeffrey go?
11:32 AM
11/17/2001
That whigger has been humiliated so many times that i lost count long
ago,well heres yet another humiliation for him.
Some of you may already know about this but for those of you who dont
heres
a recap of the challenge i made to Jeffrey (aka JiGaBoo) a while ago.
I had to attend a 2 day networking seminar a while back in cincinnati
for
the company i work for (verizon),i knew JiGaBoo lived in the cinci
area and
being that he always had a habit of calling me a coward here in the NG
because he didnt think i was signing my real name to my posts i made
him a
challenege to meet me in person for a non-violent debate.
JiGaBoo picked the place and time of our meeting,i of course showed up
a bit
early and stayed a half hour past the designated time thinking that
maybe he
was running a bit late,as predicted,JiGaBoo never showed up.
He instead sent 4 niggers to the place of our meeting hoping that they
would
beat my ass,they of course,out of utter fear and cowardice did nothing
of
the sort.
When i posted a message asking JiGaBoo why he didnt show up he claimed
that
it was *I* who never showed and he posted a receipt to try and prove
that he
was indeed at the place.
At first glance the receipt had obviously been altered,the date at the
bottom left of the receipt is clearly out of line with the rest and
the
format is different than the rest of the receipt,only a nigger wouldnt
notice the forgery.
JiGaBoo of course claimed it was real and cited a post that i made
where i
made a mistake and said saturday instead of friday and claimed that i
had
planned to not show up at all since friday was the day of our
meeting,nobody
is perfect,just because i accidentally said sat instead of friday
hardly
proves anything,especially when 3 other of my posts cleary name friday
as
being the correct day.
Well to settle this once and for all i decided to call the place of
our
meeting posing as a corporate manager tracking the receipts of my
employees
to confirm the receipt,after 3 tries i got ahold of an asistant
manager and
i was not surprised at what i found out.
Look at the attached receipt,notice it says "DRW #3",according to the
assistant manager this means that it was a drive through window order.
Look at the date on the same line,it says 11/16/01 the "1" has
been
clearly altered,its not even inline with the rest of the numbers.
Under where it says "Home of the whopper" there is a number
#12349,that is
the sale number,notice how it doesnt match the sale number below the
sub-total,the assistant manager told me on the phone that they should
be the
same.
The date at the bottom left,the most clear proof of forgery is found
there,its not even in line with the rest of the receipt,its in a world
of it
own,not even the same format.
The receipt also says "DINE IN",the assistant manager told me that it
is
clearly a drive through order if it has DRW #3 on it further proving
the
forgery.
In conclusion JiGaBoo never showed up and further humiliated himself
by
forging a receipt,this was however expected,the receipt would probably
fool
most niggers,JiGaBoo seems to think the niggers and whites are equal
even
though it has been proven many times that niggers are animals so it is
only
natural that a white god would immediately be able to tell it is a
forgery.
JiGaBoo is the first coward i have ever put in the kill file,i can
only
humiliate someone so much until the novelty of it all starts to fade
away.
HUMILIATION #11
Jeffrey runs from challenges and doesn't back up his words.
Notice how he runs like a little girl at being challenged:
Throughout 6,000 years of recorded
> > > history, the Black African Negro has invented nothing.
> > > Not a written language
> >
> > Tommyrot is *still* lying -- even after its lie has been exposed.
>
> Not much of a response, puss. Refute the citations.
Unnecessary. It has already been shown that Tommyrot is lying.
JGB
HUMILIATION #12
Little Jeffrey attempted to debate the racial issue with statistics.
Read Jeffrey's quoted post carefully and notice how it is utterly void
of
credible, if any, sources and is almost completely opinionated.
This was easily spotted by Emma, who ripped him to shreds:
(The thread speaks for itself:)
Jeffrey,
What a joke your message is: it makes statements without listing
sources:
90% of serial killers are White - no sources
"According to a private study..." - What study? Who ? What? Where?
"Whites carry more weapons than blacks" - What study? What source?
Who? Where?
And then later on your article admits that blacks are 14% of drug
users,
Well..since they are 12% of the population, that means that they use
more drugs than
Whites which contradicts your earlier statements that Whites use more.
So your entire post is BS and it admits it in the end!
How stupid you are Jeffrey.
Emma
Jeffrey G. Brown wrote:
> Looks like Tommyrot left out a few facts... about whites:
>
> <http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=10051>
>
> --- begin article ---
>
> Getting Serious About White Deviance: An Open Letter to the Pioneer Fund
> Tim Wise, AlterNet
> November 6, 2000
>
> To the Pioneer Fund:
>
> With great excitement, I recently discovered your organization's work for the
> betterment of mankind, through the applied science of racial research. As
> someone who has been investigating the disproportionately pathological
> tendencies of persons of European descent -- whites in the popular vernacular --
> imagine my delight upon reading your Charter, which notes:
>
> "The Pioneer Fund is committed to the proposition that people of different
> ethnic and cultural backgrounds are, on the basis of heredity, inherently
> unequal and can never be expected to behave or perform equally."
>
> Gentlemen, I couldn't have said it better; and given our mutual interest in
> racial differences, I feel certain you will be intrigued by my funding proposal.
>
> Just as your group has lavishly financed those whose work demonstrates the
> intellectual deficiencies of blacks, so too is it critical to examine the
> reasons for the disproportionate drug use, binge drinking, and propensity for
> serial murder that are the hallmarks of the Caucasian population.
>
> Although it has long been known that roughly 90 percent of serial killers in
> modern history have been white, only recently has evidence emerged to illuminate
> the epidemic of substance abuse in the white community.
>
> According to the Department of Health and Human Services, whites are 11 percent
> more likely to have used drugs than blacks and 25 percent more likely to have
> done so than Hispanics.
>
> What's more, recent data from the Centers for Disease Control and the National
> Household Drug Abuse Survey indicates:
>
> -- White high schoolers are 4.5 times more likely than blacks to have used
> cocaine; 3.6 times more likely to have gotten high using inhalants, like paint
> fumes or Liquid Paper; twice as likely as blacks to have used heroin; and six
> times more likely to have used methamphetamine. In fact, there are more white
> high school students who have used crystal meth than black students who
> regularly smoke cigarettes;
>
> -- Whites are 43 percent more likely than blacks to drink alcohol and 27 percent
> more likely to binge drink than blacks (consuming five or more drinks at a
> time), with white youth more than twice as likely as black youth to binge;
>
> -- Whites are 74 percent more likely than blacks to binge drink regularly (at
> least five times monthly), and white youth are three times as likely to do so;
>
> -- In fact, there are more whites who binge drink at least once a month than
> there are blacks in the entire U.S. population!
>
> And finally:
>
> -- According to a private study, white college students consume three times more
> alcoholic beverages weekly than black students, are 65 percent more likely to
> drink to the point of being hungover, and 71 percent more likely to drink 'till
> they puke.
>
> What's more, these white behaviors put others at substantial risk:
>
> -- Whites are almost twice as likely as blacks to drive drunk, and 15 percent
> more likely to do so than Hispanics;
>
> -- Whites between 12-17, are 34 percent more likely than black youth to have
> sold drugs in the past year;
>
> -- The annual cost of white alcohol and drug abuse is approximately $200 billion
> in escalated health care and law enforcement expenditures, as well as lost
> productivity;
>
> -- White males are 24 percent more likely than black males to have carried a
> weapon in the last thirty days; and white males in high school are twice as
> likely as their black counterparts to bring a weapon to school.
>
> Could these overwhelmingly consistent examples of white pathology be mere
> coincidence? Or might they indicate a genetic predisposition to such harmful
> activities? Surely, the latter possibility is strong enough to warrant a massive
> research effort to get to the bottom of these phenomena.
>
> Of course, the liberals will insist there are environmental explanations for
> white drug and alcohol problems. One can imagine them trying to blame two-earner
> white families for being too busy with their dot-com startup or landscaping
> classes at Home Depot to give their children the nurturing needed to resist
> drugs. But as the Department of Health and Human Services data indicates, white
> kids are 27 percent more likely than blacks to receive anti-drug information
> from parents, and 24 percent more likely to receive similar information in
> school, yet they just can't seem to put down their needles and pipes.
>
> Though some will insist white alcoholism is environmentally-conditioned -- what
> with happy hour at TGI Friday's and Chili's virtually entrapping white
> businessmen and soccer moms to get plowed on Micro-Brews and Flaming Margaritas
> -- in the end, I feel confident that scientific truth will prevail, and whites
> will be forced to take personal responsibility for their behavior.
>
> As for the methodology I will use to determine if there is a white genetic
> predisposition to substance abuse, I have written to Phillipe Rushton, of
> Ontario to ask for his assistance. Since you have generously underwritten
> Rushton's work on black hypersexuality -- which you'll recall he demonstrated by
> going to a shopping mall and asking blacks, whites and Asians how far they could
> ejaculate -- you will no doubt appreciate my desire to include him in this
> endeavor. I propose that Rushton return to the mall and ask blacks, whites, and
> Asians how many bong hits they can do without choking, and how many tabs of
> ecstasy they can take before their eyeballs roll back in their head and they
> begin to drool.
>
> And with help from the folks at the Genome Project, it should be easy to find
> not only the substance abuse genes in Caucasian DNA, but also those correlated
> with other high-risk, mostly white, and I dare say, pathological behaviors, like
> bunjee-jumping, skydiving, and body-piercing.
>
> Best of all, this research could directly impact public policy. Currently, in
> part because folks don't know about disproportionate white substance abuse, law
> enforcement efforts are often foolishly targeted against blacks.
>
> For example, although blacks are 14 percent of drug users, they are 35 percent
> of those arrested for possession, 55 percent of those convicted, and 75 percent
> of those incarcerated for drugs. In cities like Baltimore, Columbus and
> Minneapolis, blacks are anywhere from five to twenty times more likely to be
> arrested for drugs, though whites are the more likely users.
>
> Even worse, the drug arrest rate for black juveniles has recently climbed by
> over 75 percent, while for whites it has fallen 34 percent, and black youth are
> 48 times more likely to be incarcerated for a drug offense than whites with the
> same record, even though evidence indicates whites will more likely re-offend.
>
> By exposing pathological white substance abuse, my research could lead to a more
> efficient use of law enforcement dollars: instead of stopping cars driven by
> blacks, we could set up roadblocks leading into the suburbs, trailer parks, and
> gated communities where so many white addicts reside.
>
> Sure, some will complain they're being victimized for "Driving While White," but
> like Dinesh D'Souza says, "rational discrimination applies the logic of
> predictive evaluation to racial groups," and "is not premised upon assumptions
> of biological inferiority." In short, it's nothing personal.
>
> Additionally, we could drug test all white college students receiving federal
> financial aid, and raid their fraternities and sororities, suspending all
> subsidies to those testing positive for narcotics, or those under 21 who have
> been drinking.
>
> Unfair? Hardly: as D'Souza continues:
>
> "...rational discrimination...can be fully eradicated only by getting rid of
> destructive conduct by the group that forms the basis for statistically valid
> group distinctions. It is difficult to compel people to admire groups, many of
> whose members do not act admirably."
>
> Although Dinesh was talking about rational discrimination against blacks by taxi
> drivers, it only seems fair to apply the principle consistently, as I'm sure
> you'd agree.
>
> Though this research might inadvertently cause prejudice and discrimination
> against innocent whites, unfairly labeled deviant because of their group's
> proclivities, the search for truth cannot be suppressed in the name of political
> correctness: facts are facts, and we must go where they lead, just as those
> intrepid scholars, Charles Murray and Richard Herrnstein did in The Bell Curve,
> many of whose sources were researchers funded by your courageous organization.
>
> Yes, this is controversial. But my research would be in keeping with a Pioneer
> tradition, begun in the '30's when your group's founders imported copies of a
> Nazi propaganda film on race hygiene, for screening by American schools and
> civic groups.
>
> Just as this film, "Applied Eugenics in Present-Day Germany," demonstrated the
> folly of spending money to keep the Rhineland's genetic defectives alive, so too
> could my research demonstrate the waste of pouring money into drug education in
> mostly white schools: after all, you just can't get through to some people.
>
> It may be that nothing can wean whites from their insatiable appetites for drugs
> and alcohol. If so, then just as your founder, Wickliffe Draper, once said
> blacks were "genetically inferior," and "ought to be repatriated to Africa," so
> too will you surely be brave enough to call for a full-fledged "back to Europe"
> movement, so as to rid the U.S. of millions of narcotized Caucasian parasites.
>
> As one of your grantees, Richard Lynn says, it might even be necessary to "phase
> out" inferior cultures: a prospect that might apply to whites if they're
> unwilling or unable to clean themselves up. Such is the price of progress.
>
> So, I anxiously await your reply to my funding request. I have also contacted
> the Free Press (which published The Bell Curve and D'Souza's The End of Racism),
> since they seemed the natural choice to publish my research, once it is ready to
> appear in book form. I have even proposed a title: either The 'Saved By the
> Bell' Curve -- named after a Saturday morning television show, popular with
> white kids (probably because they're stoned) -- or the Bell-Bottom Curve: a
> satirical reference to the style of pants made popular in the late '60's and
> early '70's by whites (especially hippies and potheads).
>
> I would appreciate any ideas you may have for the research or the title of this
> guaranteed best seller. Please respond quickly: the future of our country is at
> stake.
>
> Sincerely, Tim Wise
>
> --- end article ---
>
> =====================================================================
> Jeffrey G. Brown jeffre...@mailandnews.com
> For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
> to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
> To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
HUMILIATION #13
Little Jeffrey is unable to understand simple concepts or work with
percentages.
OH..OK...well..since the genders are about 50-50...what does that
prove?
Simple -- that men commit MORE CRIMES PER CAPITA than women -- the
exact same
claim that bigots like Tommyrot make about blacks.
Obviously, the solutions that Tommyrot and its fellow bigots propose
for solving
the problem of black "criminality" should be applied equally to male
"criminality".
JGB
Read carefully...and think...
since the genders are about 50-50...what does that prove?
Tom Shelly, White God ®
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist Award, 2002
Already answered. Unfortunately, Tommyrot is unable to deal with the
answer,
since it exposes his own hypocrisy.
JGB
Jeffrey...you truly have your head up your ass. Each time we start a
thread, I humiliate the hell out of you. How ignorant and
simple-minded can you be? You may run 'Rent a Geek' but when it comes
to common sense, you have none. Let me spell it out
for you.
Let's say there were 100 crimes committed and the population of the
inhabitants were 50% men and 50% women. Their races
were distributed thus: 12% nigger and 77% White (which closely
resembles the U.S. population, more or less)
Out of the 100 crimes, 51 were committed by men and 49 by women.
Out of the same 100 crimes, 51 were committed by niggers and 49 by
Whites.
In order for men to have committed the majority of the crime in this
scenario, as you stated, 49 White men would have to commit
one crime and 1 White man would have to commit two.
But for the niggers to have committed the majority of the crime in
this scenario, as I stated, 9 niggers would have to commit 4
crimes each and 3 niggers would have to commit 5 crimes each.
GET IT? DO YOU GET MY POINT? DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHY I POSTED THIS
TWICE FOR YOU?:
Read carefully...and think...
since the genders are about 50-50...what does that prove?
Yes, men do commit a higher majority (to use your terms) of crimes
than women but since the genders are around 50-50..that
doesn't prove much. But when niggers commit the majority of violent
crime in the U.S. and their population is only at 12%, that
proves A LOT!
I can't make it any easier than this or spell it out any simplier.
This is a certified humiliation and will be noted as such.
Tom Shelly, White God ®
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist Award, 2002
HUMILIATION #14
After his cut and snip tactics are exposed (or 'delitia') and his
challenge more than adequately answered,
little Jeffrey runs from the debate as a coward and is soundly
humiliated.
> In article <3c0964d6$1...@news4.uncensored-news.com>, "NH Dave"
> > <go_back_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Why the hell do I even bother?
> >
> >jgb: I don't know. Perhaps you're simply too stupid to realize that your lies
> are
> > recognized for what they are.
>
> ??? Are you insane, or just stupid? I vote for stupid, as you are pretty
> obviously a pseudo-intellectual porch monkey coon dog.
>
> > jgb: You don't answer the questions. Posting irrelevant garbage isn't
> "answering",
> > dimwit. Whining about how unfair it is that you were caught making an
ass
> of
> > yourself isn't "answering", either.
>
> Do you make sense, even to yourself? I doubt it. You belong in a mental
> institution! I will answer your question, retardo... And I'll use small
> words, just like BroJack always does when trying in vain to make you
> understand things of the greatest simplicity... The VERY VERY few Arabs
who
> own land in Israel have had it handed down to them from previous
> generations. Arabs are not allowed to move into Israel (that "honor" is
> restricted to jews) and not allowed to obtain land from jews. DENY IT!
>
> > >jbg: And every time I ask
> > > you one, you accuse me of "evasion." You're pathetic.
>
> Well in that case, why don't you tell me how "false" the following
> statements on Israel are: (future "DELETIA"):
>
> 1) Israel deliberately, using unmarked military aircraft and torpedo
boats,
> tried to sink the USS Liberty in 1967 during the Six Day War, in an
attempt
> to draw the US into a war with Egypt. 34 US sailors died valiantly in this
> unprovoked attack by a supposed "ally." (www.ussliberty.com)
>
> 2) Jonathan Pollard was convicted of selling high-level US military
secrets
> to the government of Israel in 1985. He was sentenced to life in prison.
The
> secrets bought by the Israelis were subsequently sold to the USSR,
resulting
> in the deaths of between 30 and 50 secret agents operating within the
USSR.
>
> Your bitch-whining and delitia do not stand up well to cold, hard FACT,
> nigger. Find another hobby or I'm gonna find BroJack to come here and kick
> your ass!
>
>
HUMILIATION #15
Jasper exposes Jeffrey's manipulation of statistics and shows how he
tries to hide his lies
by listing arrested people as convicted people to purposely make us
believe that Whites
commit more crimes than they actually do.
once again, Jeffrey tries to make us believe that:
'arrested and charged' = actually committed
he states, quote:
"According to the 'Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 1999',
table
4.10,
there were 248,120 whites arrested and charged for violent offenses in
1999,
versus 162,264 blacks for the same period."
then draws this conclusion:
" Over 50% of the violent crime in the
United States is committed by whites."
this is an erroneous conclusion, not verified by his quoted source.
Little Jeffrey 'Snip-Snip' Brown tries to use 'arrested and charged
for' and
'committed by' interchangeably.
Which shows how he tries to twist facts; he cannot prove that 100 %
of
those 'whites' are actually convicted.
Further, he conveniently ignores the fact that Hispanics are counted
as
White in these statistics.
End of story, stick a fork in him, he's done!
HUMILIATION #16
When proof is posted, Jeffrey ignores it.
Brojack posted
If you are actually attractive, trim and smart and have hooked-up with
a
> non-celebrity black male, you are a rare exception. In fact, the National
> Psychological Assn. is doing a study on women like you. Their goal is to
> learn your psychosocial motivations. Some of their preliminary conclusions
> range from misplaced guilt (for what has happened in the past) to a
> superiority complex (the white woman puts herself in a situation where she
> believes she will dominate socially and intellectually).
little Jeffrey demanded!
Cite the documents that back up your claims, coward. You're a known
liar. Your
unsupported assertions are worthless.
JGB
read about it in
the National Psychological Assn.'s Dec. 2001 newsletter Vol 7 No. 12,
article by Stephen Bickston, PhD; The Harvard Health Letter Vol 27,
no. 2,
Dec 2001 "Top Health Stories Of 2001" Donna Grinspoon MD; and Consumer
Reports "On Health" Vol 13, no 12, Dec 2001.
Bro Jack
And little Jeffrey didn't respond at all to this but cut and snipped
another part of the message!
HUMILIATON #17
Little Jeffrey accused Bro Jack of falsifying data in order to achieve
a victory but was unable to meet the challenge posed to him by me to
remove Humiliation #16. In fact, not only was he unable to meet the
challenge, he ran like a coward and didn't even attempt to fight it or
back up his words and accusations. Consequently, he turned one
humiliation into two.
<bro...@windswept.net> wrote:
> >
> > > If you are actually attractive, trim and smart and have hooked-up with a
> > > non-celebrity black male, you are a rare exception. In fact, the National
> > > Psychological Assn. is doing a study on women like you. Their goal is to
> > > learn your psychosocial motivations. Some of their preliminary conclusions
> > > range from misplaced guilt (for what has happened in the past) to a
> > > superiority complex (the white woman puts herself in a situation where she
> > > believes she will dominate socially and intellectually).
> >
> > Cite the documents that back up your claims, coward. You're a known liar. Your
> > unsupported assertions are worthless.
>
> Does it hurt that white trophy-type women only hook-up with run-of-the-mill
> Rastus because of ulterior motives? That's what many in the NPA think.
> Live with it, black boy. And while you're living with it, read about it in
> the National Psychological Assn.'s Dec. 2001 newsletter Vol 7 No. 12,
> article by Stephen Bickston, PhD; The Harvard Health Letter Vol 27, no. 2,
> Dec 2001 "Top Health Stories Of 2001" Donna Grinspoon MD; and Consumer
> Reports "On Health" Vol 13, no 12, Dec 2001.
It so happens that the second document that anonymous coward "brojack"
cites is
available online at
<http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/hltext.shtml>
What does that article cite as the "Top Health Stories Of 2001"?
1. The human genome: biology into bytes.
2. Cholesterol guidelines set new targets.
3. Walking away from diabetes.
4. A pill for cancer.
5. The incredibly shrinking office visit ... or no?
6. Alzheimerís disease: Tauists and ţaptists unite.
7. Baycol withdrawn from market.
8. Bypass surgery has long-term effects on the brain.
9. A change of heart.
10. Combined screens miss cancers.
No mention of white women seeking out black men, nor their motives for
doing so.
No mention of white women or black men AT ALL.
Please, anonymous coward "brojack", please do keep lying. It's so much
fun
making a jackass out of you -- and so easy, when you're so eager to
assist.
JGB
What about the other articles? Did you look those up, Jeffrey.?
If you can prove to me that over half of the articles he cited were
false, I will remove your humiliation on this matter. But I will not
be
a party to cowardly cut and snip tactics. Answer all the post or none
of it. He cited four:
National Psychological Assn.'s Dec. 2001 newsletter Vol 7 No. 12,
> article by Stephen Bickston, PhD;
The Harvard Health Letter Vol 27, no. 2,
> Dec 2001
"Top Health Stories Of 2001" Donna Grinspoon MD;
Consumer
> Reports "On Health" Vol 13, no 12, Dec 2001.
These should be easy to look up.
Tom Shelly, White God ®
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist Award, 2002
What about the other articles? Did you look those up, Jeffrey.?
Why bother? "brojack" is a proven liar -- just like you are, Tommy.
(delitia)...
it only
took checking one of them to show that he's a liar -- just like you
are, Tommy.
JGB
Jeffrey has failed to back up his words and accusations and runs like
a coward when challenged.
HUMILIATION #18
Jeffrey has long been accused of demanding proof and then ignoring it
when it is
posted and claiming victory even though the facts tell otherwise.
Here, he admits it and by so doing, is defeated and humiliated. Since
he has
admitted to not even reading the responses of the people he is
supposedly
debating with, his posts are unworthy of a response.
Tommyrot has yet to demonstrate *any* "fault" with the statistics I
have
presented.
JGB
if you read the information you would see the 'fault' that I was
referring to.
But you didn't read it, did you?
Tom Shelly, White God ®
I didn't need to.
I accomplished my goal: demonstrating that the "White God" is simply
another
garden-variety lying bigot.
JGB
HUMILIATION #19
Once again, here we have little Jeffrey making a complete fool of
himself and actually posting information that ultimately leads to his
HUMILIATION by 'God Almighty'. This is also proof that liberals and
niggerphiles will do anything they can and attempt to manipulate any
statistic they can to change reality. Simply put: liberals are weak
men who are afraid to confront reality.
Jefferey wrote:
How, when you "correctly separate hispanics and Whites", does 156,718
>> >suddenly become a MAJORITY of 414,420?
>> >
>> >That was Tom Shelly's claim.
>> >
>> >Can you show me the math that makes it true, anonymous coward?
>>
>> What bot does is grab one word out of context in this case "majority"
>
>There is no context in which "majority" means anything other than "one
more than
>one half".
ma·jor·i·ty (m-jôr-t, -jr-)
n. pl. ma·jor·i·ties
1 .The greater number or part; a number more than half of the
total.
God Almighty responds:
Ok snipples, the very first definition, "The greater number or part",
then there is a semicolon. Only a bone-headed ignorant nigger cannot
under stand that 34 is the majority of 100 when 100 is divided into
THREE categories. Now, had he referred to TWO groups/categories THEN
51 would be the majority.
OZMAN added to Humiliation #19:
TJB
you try so hard to flame others but stick your foot deeper and deeper
in you
mouth coward. There are other definitions of majority other than
greater
than half stupid. You are pathetic. See 3C.
Main Entry: ma·jor·i·ty
Pronunciation: m&-'jor-&-tE, -'jär-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Date: 1552
1 obsolete : the quality or state of being greater
2 a : the age at which full civil rights are accorded b : the status
of one
who has attained this age
3 a : a number greater than half of a total b : the excess of a
majority
over the remainder of the total : MARGIN c : the preponderant quantity
or
share
4 : the group or political party whose votes preponderate
5 : the military office, rank, or commission of a major
- majority adjective
You are probably too stupid to know what preponderant means so here
dumbass.See 2.
Main Entry: pre·pon·der·ant
Pronunciation: pri-'pän-d(&-)r&nt
Function: adjective
Date: 15th century
1 : having superior weight, force, or influence
2 : having greater prevalence
synonym see DOMINANT
- pre·pon·der·ant·ly adverb
Since you like to play semantics coward, here is the definition of
dominant.
see 2.
dom·i·nant (dm-nnt)
adj.
1.. Exercising the most influence or control.
2.. Most prominent, as in position; ascendant.
3.. Genetics. Of, relating to, or being an allele that produces the
same
phenotypic effect whether inherited with a homozygous or heterozygous
allele.
4.. Ecology. Of, relating to, or being a species that is most
characteristic of an ecological community and usually determines the
presence, abundance, and type of other species.
5.. Music. Relating to or based on the fifth tone of a diatonic
scale.
HUMILIATION #20
This humiliation was brought to you by the "Jeffrey Slayer', Black
Plague.
Black Plague shows how Jeffrey lies and snips and catches him in two
lies about a thread which was supposed to humiliate
me..but look how quickly the rug was pulled out from underneath little
Jeffrey:
Lying cowards like Tom Shelly make big, grandiose threats --
Hmmm,funny,i see nowhere in Tom Shelly's post where he "threatens"
anyone
o'gutless one,especially no signs of threats on a 'grandiose' scale.
threat (thrt)
n.
An expression of an intention to inflict pain, injury, evil, or
punishment.
An indication of impending danger or harm.
One that is regarded as a possible danger; a menace.
tr.v. Archaic threat·ed, threat·ing, threats
To threaten.
Do keep making a jackass of yourself o'gutless one,its so much easier
to make
you look like one when your obviously more than willing to cooperate.
Incompetence, thy name is Jeffrey G. Brown.
Cowardice, thy name is Jeffrey G. Brown.
Evasiveness, thy name is Jeffrey G. Brown.
Lie, thy name is Jeffrey G. Brown.
Forgery, thy name is Jeffrey G. Brown.
Shelly clearly threatened to "run [my] ass" off the
newsgroup.
Telling someone that they are going to "run them off" of a newsgroup
does not in
any way shape or form fit the definition of a threat,perhaps you
should again
re-read the definition of the word gutless coward...
AND NOW THE ISSUE OF THE DATE I TOOK THE PICTURE:
Exactly what 'date' did Tom Shelley claim to have taken the picture o'
gutless
one?
He didn't give an exact date, anonymous coward. But he did claim to
have done it
shortly before 12/03/01.
Funny,i see nowhere in Tom Shelly's post(s) where he makes any mention
of a date
in reference to the picture of the house,is this just another one of
Jeffrey's
"i assume it to be true because i made it up myself" posts?
I would like to thank the gutless coward Jeffrey G. Brown for once
again showing
us that it is incapable of carrying on a discussion without resorting
to 'blind
stabs in the dark' to support its claims,do keep up the 'good' work
gutless
coward,we probably would not be able to expose you as much as we do
without your
eagerness to cooperate.
December 3 was when Tommy posted his claim that he'd taken the
picture.
Irrelevant,just because someone posts a picture on a certain date does
not in
any way prove the date in which the picture was actually taken.
Is your sidetracking away from the original discussion done yet or are
you still
running from that with your well noted dodging tactics?
Shelly's note: At this point, little Jeffrey abandoned the thread and
I don't blame him. What a humiliation!
HUMILIATION #21
More of little Jeffrey's cut and snip tactics exposed.
In article <3C1BCB3B...@earthlink.net>, "Tom Shelly, White God"
<toms...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> muh dik
....
Pathetic, isn't it?
The lying moron that calls itself "Tom Shelly" really does think it's
proving
something about somebody else when it does this.
JGB
Captain snippy likes to lie and manipulate and assume things in order
to 'win' his arguments:
It means that lying bigots like "Tom Shelly" can't construct rational
argumemts
-- nothing more.
The following is taken from the AFN FAQ's which are available from
Reb:
6 - What is "niggerbabble"?
niggerbabble is the unintelligible babbling that comes out of a
nigger's mouth. It may come out sounding like "I
beez wantz a White womin", or "I beez killn Whitey", or "Muh dik, muh
dik". niggers often issue forth these
babblings while grabbing their crotches, in a desperate attempt to
keep their sexual organs from falling off due to the
effects of the many niggerborne communicable diseases they're infested
with.
With babblings such as, "Whitey owz me a livin' ", or "What I did
beez Whitey's fault", niggers often use
niggerbabble to avoid personal responsibility.
Once again, as in his last Humiliation, it's easy to see how Jeffrey
hides and manipulates the truth in order to further his true
goal: harassing people who correctly disagree with his views. It is
common knowlege among the Whites in this group that
responding to a nigger or niggerphile post with 'muh dik' means that
the post is completely void of any argument or substance
and is simply 'niggerbabble'.
Tom Shelly, White God
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist, 2002
Black Plague adds:
It seems quite clear that the coward Jeffrey G. Brown is content on
taking the
comments of others completely out of context in order to harrass the
person(s)
involved that it has disagreements with and Jeffrey,finding itself on
the losing
end of the dissagreement,has no other alternative se'sbar an
intelligent reply
to continue the debate when knowing the outcome will undoubtedly prove
the
coward Jeffrey to be wrong thereby losing said debate.
Examples of this axiom are found everywhere,here are but a few links
pointing to
other examples of the lying coward Jeffrey losing his ass in debate
then
resorting to 'snip' out of context the posts of the person(s) it is
losing
against.....
Do keep making a complete fool of yourself o'gutless one,that saves me
from
doing the little bit of work it would take to do it for you.
HUMILIATION #22
Doc Tavish royally kicks Jeffrey's ass!
Debate on Jews in Red Revolution Usenet, June 19, 1998, Doc Tavish
debates
Jeffrey G. Brown with Supporting Internet Links
Doc Tavish Says:
EVIDENCE #1
http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=288129033 Subject: The Russian
Revolution: Still inspiring after 80 years (Reprinted from the
November 8,
1997 issue of the People's Weekly World. May be reprinted or reposted
with
PWW credit. For subscription information see below)
"The Bolshevik Party (later the Communist Party) was the party of the
industrial workers in Russia.... After the revolution, all legal
restrictions were abolished, and the first Soviet President was a Jew,
Yakov
Sverdlov."
************************************************************ Tired of
the
same old system: Join the Communist Party, USA Info: CP...@rednet.org;
or
(212) 989-4994; or http://www.hartford-hwp.com/cp-usa
************************************************************
EVIDENCE #2
[Communist Party organ declares first President of Soviet Union was a
Jew!
The first Chairman appointed to the Soviet State was a Jew, a Jew with
an
alias of Trotsky. Tavish]
http://www.idbsu.edu/surveyrc/Staff/jaynes/marxism/bios/trotsky.htm
Originally named Lev Davidovich Bronstein, Trotsky was born on
November 7,
1879, in Kherson Province in Ukraine, the son of Russified Jews....
The March Revolution of 1917 caught him by surprise in New York City,
where
he wrote for a Russian newspaper. Trotsky reached Russia in May,
quickly
assumed leadership of the independent left Social-Democratic
Interdistrict
Group, and joined the Petrograd (as St. Petersburg was renamed)
Soviet.
Within weeks, he had gained enormous popularity as the most eloquent
agitator of the Soviet left. In July, after being courted by Lenin, he
joined the Bolshevik party and was elected to its Central Committee.
As a Bolshevik, Trotsky was elected chairman of the Soviet in
September. He
sided with Lenin on the need to overthrow the provisional government
and
devoted all his energies to marshaling support for the armed uprising
of the
Bolsheviks. With Lenin in hiding, Trotsky was the general in charge,
and he
successfully directed the masses of workers and soldiers in the
November
revolution......
[How many of you think that Jew Trotsky's revolution was bloodless and
was a
debate of ideas? Notice the first Chairman of the Soviet was a Jew
named
Trotsky. Trotsky was also the first General and commander of the Red
"Bolshevik" Army! Tavish]
http://csf.Colorado.EDU/psn/marx/Other/Trotsky/
states:
"Lev Davidovich Bronstein. Leader of the Russian Revolution. Architect
of
the Red Army. Commissar of foreign affairs between 1917-1924." Let's
see ol'
Bronstein was the Leader of the Revolution and the Architect of the
Red Army
too!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EVIDENCE #3
http://www.aish.org/dt-liber.htm
Society: Where Judaism and Liberalism Part
by Rabbi Nachum Braverman Aish HaTorah Los Angeles
It's often considered axiomatic that Jews are politically liberal.
This
impression has some basis in fact. In 1991, the National Jewish
Community
Relations Council (NJCRC) identified the public agenda of the Jewish
community as activism on behalf of Israel, and Soviet and Ethiopian
Jewry,
as well as "social and economic justice." ...
[ ... ]
Though many Jews are liberal this no more makes liberalism the Jewish
agenda
than the prominence of Jews among Bolsheviks made Bolshevism the
Jewish
agenda.
[Notice the Rabbi used the word "prominenence." Tavish]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EVIDENCE #4
http://www.jewishamerica.com/TimeLine/haskala.htm
[...]
The Czar exploits the break-offs. In their struggle against
traditional
Judaism, Haskala Jews are given some privileges and assistance,
sometimes
clandestinely. Some get influence in the Bureau of Jewish Affairs and
interfere with religious matters.....
A lot of Haskala Jews are ready to give up on Russia. Many channel
their
energy into creating a home land of their own.
Some Haskala Jews turn to political revolution. The Russian Revolution
of
the early 20th century will overthrow the Czarist government and it
will be
led by a disproportionate number of Jews. The Czar that used civil
unrest
against the Jews will be destroyed by it.
[Notice the "Russian Revolution... will be led by a disproportionate
number
of Jews..." Tavish]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
MORE EVIDENCE:
Among the Jews who remained in Russia, which then included Lithuania,
Ukraine (A History of Ukraine, Michael Hrushevsky, Yale University
Press,
1941, passim), and much of Poland, were the founders of the Russian
Bolshevik party.
In 1897 was founded the Bund, the union of Jewish workers in Poland
and
Lithuania. . . They engaged in revolutionary activity upon a large
scale,
and their energy made them the spearhead of the Party (Article on
"Communism" by Harold J. Laski, Encyc. Brit., Vol. III, pp 824-827).
"Individual revolutionary leaders and Sverdlov -- played a conspicuous
part
in the revolution of November, 1917, which enabled the Bolshevists to
take
possession of the state apparatus" (Univ. Jew. Encyd., Vol. IX,
p.668). Here
and there in the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia other Jews are named as
co-founders of Russian Communism, but not Lenin and Stalin. Both of
these,
however, are said by some writers to be half-Jewish. Whatever the
racial
antecedents of their top man, the first Soviet commissariats were
largely
staffed with Jews. The Jewish position in the Communist movement was
well
understood in Russia. "The White Armies which opposed the Bolshevik
government linked Jews and Bolsheviks as common enemies" (Univ. Jewish
Encyc., Vol. I, p. 336).
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I certify that as of this date (June 19, 1998) all of the links above
are
active and that anyone checking them will find the material I used.
CASE CLOSED
>> [...deletia...] > >> That's what is called winning an argument by
assertion. > >Liar should know, since he's made liberal use of the
tactic
ever since he >arrived on Usenet.
I've made no assertion- I posted factual evidence- care to denigrate
me and
call me a liar too? Jeffrey, do you wish to deny in front of all that
my
evidence is but mere fabrications or that I lie?
A review of what was said:
>> The overwhelmingly Jewish presence in the upper ranks of the Bolshevist
>> leadership seems pretty well established to me.
Jeffrey Georg Brown said: >The overwhelmingly Jewish presence in the
upper
ranks of the Bolshevist >leadership has been 'seriously called into
question' -- so, by Liar's own >standards, nothing at all has been
proved.
My sources said of the Jewish presence: "..the first Soviet President
was a
Jew, Yakov Sverdlov." , "Lev Davidovich Bronstein, Trotsky... the son
of
Russified Jews...." , "As a Bolshevik, Trotsky was elected chairman of
the
Soviet... and devoted all his energies to marshaling support for the
armed
uprising of the Bolsheviks" , "Lev Davidovich Bronstein. Leader of the
Russian Revolution. Architect of the Red Army. Commissar of foreign
affairs
between 1917-1924." , "...prominence of Jews among Bolsheviks..." ,
"Russian
Revolution... will be led by a disproportionate number of Jews..." ,
and
"Among the Jews who remained in Russia, ... were the founders of the
Russian
Bolshevik party."
Doc Tavish
--
This isn't School,Mexico,Africa or some Socialist Employee
of a School District or a PC Communist Appointed Employee
of a Government entity.
So Merry Christmas!!!
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
HUMILIATION #23
Black Plague, the Jeffrey Slayer, continually puts little snippy in
his place and
humiliates him by turning his own tactics against him.
Like a true coward that he accuses everyone else of being, Jeffrey
ignores this post and runs
like a girl.
Jeffrey you still have not answered this.........
Here we clearly see the coward,liar,forger Jeffrey G. Clown once again
demonstrating that even when it has no legs it will still try to
stand.......
posted 12-18-01 5:37 p.m. EST
"I have noticed that whenever Jeffrey is backed into a corner,and has
no other
lines of defense left it always pulls out the old "anonymous coward"
claim,more
often than not it uses the claim as a sidetracking trick,an unfounded
slur of
sorts.....or it is?
The word 'anonymous' has several meanings,all are very well related:
a·non·y·mous:
Having an unknown or unacknowledged name: an anonymous author.
Having an unknown or withheld authorship or agency: an anonymous
letter; an
anonymous phone call.
Having no distinctive character or recognition factor: "a very great,
almost
anonymous center of people who just want peace" (Alan Paton).
The word 'coward' has but one basic meaning:
cow·ard:
One who shows ignoble fear in the face of danger or pain.
So in order to use both words together when making accusations and
slurs against
others one must know exactly what both words mean so that said person
using them
can do so with complete confidence,otherwise one can find
him/her/itself in a
very embarrasing situation full of backfiring humiliation.
However,here is a quote by Jeffrey G. Brown explaining his feelings
about using
pseudonyms,or otherwise known as being a 'anonymous coward':
""Racists are also afraid of personal responsibility, to the extent
that they
understand the concept at all. The most obvious manifestation of this
is the use
of pseudonyms to avoid the need to take responsibility for their own
words and
actions. "white_phosphorous" itself demonstrate this fear, as do "Joe
Schmoe","God Almighty" and "Black Plague".""
Here is a quote from Jeffrey to white_phosphorous:
""Do try to stay on topic, anonymous coward.""
The second quote from Jeffrey was one out of rage and a pure lack of
nothing
better to come back at white_phosphorus with since white_phosphorous
completely
beat and humiliated jeffrey in a debate contained within the same
thread,but is
white_phosphorous truely a 'anonymous coward' as Jeffrey claims him to
be?
I personally do not know anything about white_phosphorous other than
the fact
that he is a bigot who always backs up whatever claim he makes with
facts and/or
statistics that are easily verifiable.
However the focus should not be totally on white_phosphorous for using
a
pseudonym,nor should it be focused on 'God Almighty' or any other
pseudonym user
for that matter,the focus should be on the one making the bold
accusation of
others being 'anonymous cowards'.
Jeffrey G. Brown,is that its real name? how do we know it is its real
name? and
can Jeffrey back up its claim that it is signing its real name to the
posts it
makes?
Or has Jeffrey been fooling everyone this whole time? after much
searching i
have not been able to find anything that proves to me that Jeffrey G.
Brown is
its real name at all,nor have i found any post where Jeffrey claims
the name is
real,i did however find several posts that show an address and then a
picture of
a house reported to be owned by Jeffrey but still no concrete proof
that Jeffrey
G. Brown is its real name at all or that its the actual owner of the
house.
So here we have Jeffrey G. Brown making claims against others that
Jeffrey cant
possibly back up in any way,shape or form since we dont even know if
Jeffrey G.
Brown is its real name or not!
I have also noticed something about Jeffrey,it seems that whenever
someone posts
a message that is completely racist and sometimes threatening against
another
ones life Jeffrey will do nothing,even when the poster is obviously
posting
under a pseudonym,here are but a few examples:
From abu abui:
"I notice they dont have any poor stupid white trash like yourself on
there.
'What we need is the destruction of whiteness which is the source of
human misery in the world.'-- Rev. James Cone' "
From BlackStaR:
"I cant wait til i get the chance to cut some racist motherfuckers
throat"
From Uriel:
Crack, as addictive as that is would totally prevent anyone who
chooses to
consume it from posting in here. I would imagine the crack high to
make you
people a lot more insignificant than you already are. As for alcohol,
why
bother posting in this den of retards when you're drunk? I'm not a
white guy
you know!!!! There's much better things to do when inebriated, like we
be
clubbin' fool!!!
These are but 3 examples,the majority of posts by these 3 same posters
contain
utter stupity and/or talk of violence and/or drug use as well as posts
by others
such as 'ExtremeOne' 'O'Keefe' 'Tiffany' and many others but just how
many times
has Jeffrey G. Brown called any of these people a 'anonymous coward'?
i have yet
to find a single post!
The only ones Jeffrey attacks with its 'anonymous coward' stance are
the ones
who make clean,fact filled posts that do not contain talks of violence
against
others who speak against them or talk of drug use and how it is a good
thing to
do or just make intelligent conversation among fellow bigots,these
seem to be
the target for Jeffreys accusations.
So is Jeffrey 'favoring' one person over another? is Jeffrey calling
the bigots
'anonymous cowards' but not saying anything to anyone else because
Jeffrey
itself is also a bigot?
After all,being a bigot doesnt have to mean that your a racist:
big·ot
One who is strongly partial to one's own group, religion, race, or
politics and
is intolerant of those who differ.
Jeffrey is a bigot,plain and simple,and fits completely within the
description
of what a 'bigot' really is.
====================================
Black Plague
aka James Riske
Proud recipient of the 'Jeffrey Slayer' award
A.F.N 2001
HUMILIATION #24
Here we have Jeffrey in another fight (yeah,imagine that) with Brojack
when
Jeffrey pulls out this claim about child infanticide....
"Nope. You're lying. Whites killed more children than blacks in the
time span
you
referenced -- about 32% more:
<http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/tables/kidstab.htm>
Keep lying, coward. I'll keep throwing your lies right back in your
face.
JGB
P.S. 54% of those child victims were killed by men -- men just like
you, gutless
bigot."
Poor Jeffrey,obviously it didnt read the whole page and just assumed
its
conclusion to be correct,Jeffreys claim is completely false of
course,when
taking another look at the figures in 'per capita' the figures tell a
completely
different story.......
Infanticide Rates per 100,000 Population by Race of Victim
White Black Other
1976 2.4 10.2 3.2
1977 2.3 10.4 2.2
1978 2.5 10.6 2.5
1979 2.3 8.8 3.8
1980 2.4 9.4 2.2
1981 2.4 8.4 2.5
1982 2.5 9.5 3.2
1983 2.2 9.7 2.5
1984 2.3 8.1 2.0
1985 2.3 8.1 1.4
1986 2.5 11.5 2.4
1987 2.4 8.6 2.2
1988 2.4 10.2 1.3
1989 2.6 9.2 2.2
1990 2.5 9.3 2.0
1991 2.7 11.3 2.9
1992 2.4 9.8 1.6
1993 2.4 11.3 2.7
1994 2.6 10.2 2.0
1995 2.6 8.8 1.7
1996 2.7 9.5 2.3
1997 2.3 8.0 2.2
1998 2.4 8.1 1.2
1999 2.2 7.4 2.0
Here we see blacks clearly in the lead by quite a strong
margin,Jeffrey once
again is wrong,since the population of blacks is so much less than
that of
whites the only correct way of looking at stats is by per capita..
per cap·i·ta
adv. & adj.
Per unit of population; per person: In that year, Americans earned
$15,304 per
capita. Among the states, Connecticut has a high per capita income.
Equally to each individual.
Oh wait,Jeffrey wants to discuss this? oh no,guess i got my hopes up
too
much,Jeffrey just wants to pretend that it wants to discuss this but
when shown
clear undenyable proof that it is wrong jeffrey will never dare to
discuss it
with me because Jeffrey knows what the outcome will always be........
"> [...deletia...]
Don't want to discuss the killing of white children by their parents,
do you,
coward?
Run away, little worm...
JGB"
"> [...deletia...]
Don't want to discuss the killing of white children by their parents,
do you,
coward?
JGB"
> [...deletia...]
Don't want to discuss the killing of white children by their parents,
do you,
coward?
JGB"
"Thanks. Your admission of cowardice is now on permanent record.
Now, why do you suppose that white children are so often killed by
their own
male parents?
JGB"
"False. The anonymous coward "Jasper" has made it clear that it is
afraid to
discuss the murder of white children by their parents. It is so afraid
of this
topic that it has repeatedly attempted to divert the discussion from
its
original topic. Alas, it forgets that anonymous cowards are unable to
control
any discussion.
Why do white parents kill their children, coward?
JGB"
"> [...deletia: evasion...]
Why do white parents kill their children, coward?
JGB"
"Anonymous coward "brojack" is lying. The table clearly shows that
black
children
are killed less often than white children.
Why do white parents kill their children so much more often, lying
jackass?
Keep lying, imbecile. I'll be here to throw your lies right back in
your face.
JGB"
Jeffrey sure 'acts' like it wants to discuss this but Jeffrey never
really
does....
====================================
Black Plague
aka James Riske
Proud recipient of the 'Jeffrey Slayer' award
A.F.N 2001
HUMILIATION #25
I.M. White writes:
In a recent post, I explained how JGB is a hypocrite for calling
everyone
else an anonymous coward when he himself uses an anonymous news client
to
hide his identity. When another poster called JGB on this, JGB came
right
out and said he did not use a remailer. Well folks, here is proof to
the
contrary.
Question posed to Jeffery by another poster: "Jeffery, why did you cut
out
the part about the remailer. Why would would a courageous and
righteous
paragon of truth and justice such as yourself have a remailer?"
Jeffery's reply: "I don't."
The above post can be found under the thread below of "Not even peanut
butter" dated December 24, 2001.
Below, I have posted the source path of JGB's post. Note the
"news.alt.net."
in the first line of the path. The routing paths are always listed
from
right to left, i.e., the origin of the post being furthest to the
right with
the destination being furthest to the left in the string. This domain
belongs to Altopia Corporation who provides anonymous newsgroup
services.
Also note the message ID which clearly shows news.alt.net as the
sending
domain. Message ID's are unique to the sender. In simple terms,
Altopia is
the service JGB is using to purposely hide the originating ISP of his
news
client.
Path:
e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com!newsfeeds-atl2!btnet-peer1!btnet!news.maxwell.sy
r.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.alt.net!jeffreygbrown
From: "Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com>
Newsgroups: alt.flame.niggers
Subject: Re: Not even peanut butter?
Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 23:32:13 -0500
Organization: none
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <jeffreygbrown-C1E...@news.alt.net>
References: <_VsV7.8703$KQ3.1...@news1.oke.nextra.no>
<3c26a60d$1...@news4.uncensored-news.com>
<jeffreygbrown-6B1...@news.alt.net>
<3c26a...@news4.uncensored-news.com>
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
Xref: usenetserver.com alt.flame.niggers:410729
X-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 23:22:07 EST
(e3500-atl1.usenetserver.com)
HUMILIATION #26
Jeffrey routinely lies about crime statistics and manipulates
statistics to fit into his incorrect and brainwashed view of the
world.
Here, he boldly lies and challenges someone to cite an instance in
which he lied and is CAUGHT in a bold-faced, outright LIE!
"EOO" wrote:
> Blacks commit the most crime in every category
False. Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown
How strange, then, that you are utterly unable to cite a single
instance in
which I have lied.
JGB
LIE!
niggers commit over 90% of all reported crime
Martin Schönteich
Researcher, Crime and Justice Programme, Institute
for Security Studies
Published in African Security Review Vol 9 No
4, 2000
It is a difficult question to answer as crime statistics for many
African states are
notoriously unreliable or non-existent.
The two most complete sources for African crime statistics come from
the International
Criminal Police Organisation
(Interpol), which provides figures on the actual number of crimes
reported to the police in
various countries, and victim
surveys which have been conducted in a selected number of African
countries by the
United Nations.
The Interpol figures also indicate that, of the nine listed
sub-Saharan countries, the
majority of crime is commited by native Africans. In fact, over 90%
of all reported crime
was commited by native blacks.
Tom Shelly, White God
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist, 2002
HUMILIATION #27
This is too funny to be true. How humiliated can you get?
Proof that Jeffrey's wife is a porker:
(remember, if she's admitting to 182 on her license, she must be
around 210)
Name
>BROWN,SUSAN A
>DL Number RG613787
>DL Type 1
>
>Adress
>8357 SUMMITRIDGE
>City/State/Zip
>CINCINNATI OH 45255
>
>Dob Dec 21 1954
>Height 510
>Weight 182
>Eyes BRO
>Hair BRO
HUMILIATION #28
The "Jeffrey Slayer", Black Plague, never fails to give Jeffrey a
boot up his ass:
In article <jeffreygbrown-B70...@news.alt.net>, Jeffrey
G. Brown
says...
[...snip...]
>> Whenever anyone else makes a correction, you rant and rave about how they
>> purposely lied.
>
>Cite an example, lying coward.
>
>JGB
======================================================================
As requested by the anonymous coward 'Jeffrey G. Brown'.........
"Jeffrey G. Brown" <jeffre...@mailandnews.com> wrote in message
news:jeffreygbrown-45F...@news.alt.net...
> In article <UD4W7.6597$mu.46...@typhoon.neo.rr.com>, anonymous coward
"Joe
> Schmoe" wrote:
>
> > Ans JiGaBoo is completely incapable of confronting anyone that he fights
> > with in the newsgroups,instead he tells them to meet him somewhere and
> > doesnt show
>
> Easy to say when the gutless bigot in question decides to show up
twenty-four
> hours late -- and is stupid enough to advertise its planned wimpout in
advance...
>
> "See you saturday whigger,i have my doubts you'll even be there."
>
> -- From: "Joe Schmoe" <godam...@netscape.net>
> -- Subject: Re: muh dik
> -- Message-ID: <Kl3J7.17499$z55.2...@typhoon.neo.rr.com>
> -- Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 07:36:10 GMT
>
> Stay stupid, coward...
>
> JGB
[...snip...]
> In article <UD4W7.6597$mu.46...@typhoon.neo.rr.com>, anonymous coward
"Joe
> Schmoe" wrote:
>Funny how you bring up a mistaken post all the time yet i bring up
>confirmned proof that you didnt show at all coward,forged receipt,just who
>did you think you were going to fool nigger lover?
>
>> [...deletia...]
===============================================================================
Now lets sit back and watch as the anonymous coward 'Jeffrey G. Brown'
throws
out an entire book of lies to try and get out of this one.
====================================
Black Plague
aka James Riske
Proud recipient of the 'Jeffrey Slayer' award
A.F.N 2001
HUMILIATION #29
In his own words and by his own standards, Jeffrey proves himself to
be a liar and dishonest
and unashamedly uses a double-standard. His hypocrisy is evident
below:
JEFFREY'S OWN STANDARDS OF A LIE:
Note that in its latest series of lies, Tom Shelly is quoting
statistics dealing
solely with Africa but claiming that these statistics apply to "all"
blacks.
The dishonesty of the mindless bigot can be no better illuminated
than by Shelly's deliberately misleading claims.
JGB
you've switched to African statistics. You lie when you use them to
support
claims about "all" blacks. You will be reminded of your dishonesty
frequently, Tommy
he takes numbers derived from a small
part
> of Africa and claims that they apply to all blacks.
>
> Tommy is just as stupid a liar as you are, coward.
>
> JGB
> Shall I post the statistic that niggers commit 90% of ALL crime in Africa
...and then claim that this proves that blacks commit 90% of ALL
crime, as you
have before?
Sure, lying coward, go ahead. Why should I care that you are stupid
enough to
repeat your lies?
JGB
JEFFREY'S STATEMENTS MEETING HIS OWN STANDARDS AND DEFINITION OF A
LIAR:
Using statistics 'dealing solely with the U.S. and claiming that they
apply to all Whites" - his
own definition of a lie and series of lies:
Whites commit the majority of violent crime. Period. The data does not
support
your claims.
Stay stupid, lying coward.
JGB
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. Argue with reality,
moron.
JGB
Of course I can deny that, because it isn't true. Whites commit more
violent
crimes than blacks.
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. You're a liar.
Stay stupid, lying coward...
JGB
your finding a
new catchphrase change the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Do continue making a complete jackass of yourself, won't you?
JGB
in fact, whites commit more crime than
>blacks. The "per capita" gambit is merely your clumsy way of trying to conceal
>your lie.
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period.
JGB
Whites commit more violent crime than blacks, moron. Don't argue with
me --
argue with reality (as if you'd recognize it...)
JGB
You've chosen to ignore the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Stay stupid, coward...
JGB
Explain to us, lying shitstain, how "Niggers commit the majority of
crime" when
WHITES commit "the larger number" of "the QUANTITY or NUMBER" of
crimes?
Stay stupid, feckless bigot...
JGB
Who commits the "MAJORITY" of violent crimes by YOUR definition,
shitwad? Why,
whites do, of course.
No wonder you cannot bring yourself to sign your name to your ever
more obvious
lies. Run away again, gutless fool.
JGB
There is no context that changes the statement "whites commit the
majority of
crime" into anything else, lying pinhead.
JGB
AFTER ALL HIS LYING, JEFFREY CHALLENGES PEOPLE TO PROVE HE LIES:
AND ONLY PROVES HIS OWN HYPOCRISY AND INABILITY TO DEBATE
WITHOUT RESORTING TO LIES.
How strange, then, that you are utterly unable to cite a single
instance in
which I have lied.
Stay stupid, shitstain.
JGB
since you're a bigot and a liar. Obfuscation and deception are
your stock in trade. But it will be fun watching you try to pretend
otherwise..
JGB
Keep lying, moron. It's amusing to see just how blatantly dishonest
your hate
can make you.
JGB
You have no credibility because you are a liar, little fool. You are a
liar
because you are a bigot, and bigots *must* lie to support their
"arguments".
There is no context that can change you from a liar into an honest
man. You've
already made the decision to lie. Now you have to live with the
consequences of
your moral incompetence.
JGB
What *is* it about you bigots that makes lying such an integral part
of your
nature?
JGB
Like all bigots, the anonymous coward "Jasper" *must* lie to support
its
arguments.
JGB
HUMILIATON #30
My God....
This Jeffrey G. Brown is one sick man.
I wonder if the management at the TV station he is affliated with
would be interested in knowing his views on pictures of naked
children? It would be interesting to find out. I'm sure someone on
here may clip and print Doc Tavish message (text below) and
send the message to:
Wkrc Tv
1906 Highland Ave
MOUNT AUBURN, OH 45219
513-763-5500
Although, I would caution them to be certain that the information is
correct and to write a factual letter only and not to accuse
anyone of anything. I mean, did Jeffrey actually write that message?
If it can be confirmed that he did, I think the station should
be aware of his view on pictures of naked children before they use his
services anymore.
(payback's a bitch, huh, JGB?)
THE MESSAGE EXPOSING JGB AS SUPPORTING NAKED PICTURES OF CHILDREN:
JEFFREY G. BROWN'S WRITINGS IN ITALICS:
I merely pointed out that you lied when you claimed that Mr. McVay had
posted an
>"apologia". He didn't.
>
>You're the one equating images of naked children with pornography.
The greater majority of people do view "naked children" pictures being
on the
net as pornography.
>That tells us a great deal about your twisted imagination, but
>nothing at all about Mr. McVay.
It tells us that you are not mainstream. Do you look at "naked
children"
pictures from the internet? If it is OKAY as you imply then you
wouldn't mind
admitting it? McVay certainly has viewed pictures of "naked children"
from the
internet and the way he talks he appears to have see a lot!
Why don't you go tell your neighbors and all of your RENT-A-GEEK
customers what
McVay said and see if they don't have susp;icions you're a pedophile!
Tell
everyone: "I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of
proportion (I've been on and around the Net since 1988, and have yet
to come
across anything I'd consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked
children.."
and see how much business you get or how much less your neighbors give
you a
greeting
How sick. This message will be forwarded to all the anti pedophile
groups on the internet for immediate action, JGB!
HUMILIATION #31
ANOTHER EXPOSED JEFFREY LIE:
Brojack wrote:
I often criticized Jeffy-Poo for 1) saying that black crime was
exaggerated while 2) at the same time hiding in an all-white
neighborhood away from his black brethren.
This frustrated Jeffy so badly, that he implied most strongly that
he's white.
He has denied that he ever suggested that he's white, but lawdy,
lawdy, looky what I found:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&threadm=3bc8bfc8.41344902%40news.supernews.com&rnum=
275&prev=/groups%3Fq%3DJeffrey%2BG%2BBrown%2Bwhite%2Bman%26start%3D270%26hl%3Den%
26scoring%3Dd%26selm%3D3bc8bfc8.41344902%2540news.supernews.com%26rnum%3D275
>"brojack" continues its fantasy that I must be black because I expose it for the
>dishonest coward that it is. It seems unable to conceive of a white man
>recognizing a lying bigot when he sees one.
Ahem. Case closed.
Bro Jack
HUMILIATION #32
Jeffrey continues his blatant series of lies and attempts to attribute
statements others have made to me and attack me in order to change the
subject of the debate which was completely humiliating him.
Typical of niggerphiles and liberals. Lying is common to them when
trying to divert attention from people seeking the truth.
In article <3C634BB6...@ethiopia.com>, "Tom Shelly, White Liar"
<apesn...@ethiopia.com> wrote:
> I often criticized Jeffy-Poo for 1) saying that black crime was
> exaggerated
Another lie. I have never stated that "black crime was exaggerated".
Bigots *must* lie to support their arguments. I thank Tommyrot for
again
demonstrating the proof of this axiom.
JGB
Who's lying, Jeffrey?
I never wrote that. This is just another example of your cut and snip
nonsense. If you look directly above the statement you
are quoting, you will find this:
Brojack wrote:
I often criticized Jeffy-Poo for 1) saying that black crime was
exaggerated
This is yet another humiliation to add to the list and yet another
example of your lies and snip tactics.
niggerphiles often have to lie and censor others to hide the Truth
because they are afraid they lack the mettle to rise up and do
anything about the holocaust of crime and savagery that is going on
right under their noses.
HUMILIATION #33
JEFFREY'S LIES CONTINUE, UNABATED
Message-ID: <jeffreygbrown-041...@news.alt.net>
I'm stating flat out that I have never "delet[ed] selected words of
others within a sentence", nor have I ever "insert[ed] [words] so that
the original meaning is lost". You will be unable to find any post in
which I have done so.
JGB
OH BOY! Jeffrey really has topped himself this time! Where do you
want me to start? There are so many examples of him deleting words of
others within a sentence it's pitiful. Just too many to post.
I will begin collecting such examples starting with this one.
Here's the first of many examples of Jeffrey deleting words of others
within a sentence:
Tommyrot wrote the claim that "NIGGERS COMMIT OVER 50% OF THE VIOLENT
CRIME IN
THE U.S."
It even apologized for using all caps.
"Tommyrot" is lying -- again.
JGB
The actual post with the 'words within a sentence' he deleted in bold:
UNWITTINGLY, NIGGER URINAL MAKES A FOOL OF HERSELF AND BY HER
INABILITY
TO UNDERSTAND SIMPLE STATISTICAL DATA, PROVED THAT NIGGERS
COMMIT OVER
50% OF THE VIOLENT CRIME IN THE U.S. WHILE BEING ONLY 12% OF THE
POPULATION!
SNIP NUMBER 2:
This is one of the most obvious lies Jeffrey has yet to produce...WOW!
What a cut and snip job!
> He is actually posting statistics I posted
Yes, I am. Thanks for admitting that, idiot.
And those statistics show that whites commit more violent crime than
blacks.
Poor, stupid Tommyshit didn't realize that when it posted that data.
Now it's
trying desperately to discredit its own statistics.
JGB
Here's the actual post with the snipped parts in bold, notice how the
meaning is completely changed:
He is actually posting statistics I posted which were never meant to
be a comparison between the offenders of crime between
the four races in the U.S.: Whites, hispanics, asians, and niggers.
How could they be? They combine Whites and hispanics...I
posted them as a comparison of interracial crime and they were part of
a multi-paragraphed posting (true to nature, Jeffrey
snipped it).
SNIP NUMBER 3:
1.
>
> ma·jor·i·ty Pronunciation Key (m-jôr-t, -jr-)
> n. pl. ma·jor·i·ties
>
> 1.The greater number or part; a number more than half of the total.
Thank you.
Whites commit the majority of violent crimes in the U.S.
JGB
ACTUAL POST:
1.
ma·jor·i·ty Pronunciation Key (m-jôr-t, -jr-)
n. pl. ma·jor·i·ties
1.The greater number or part; a number more than half of the
total.
2.The amount by which the greater number of votes cast, as in an
election, exceeds the total number
of remaining votes.
3.The political party, group, or faction having the most power by
virtue of its larger representation or
electoral strength.
4.Law. The status of having reached full legal age, with
attendant rights and responsibilities.
5.The military rank, commission, or office of a major.
6.Obsolete. The fact or state of being greater; superiority.
http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=majority
http://www.bartleby.com/61/85/M0048500.html
2.
Main Entry: ma·jor·i·ty
Pronunciation: m&-'jor-&-tE, -'jär-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Date: 1552
1 obsolete : the quality or state of being
greater
2 a : the age at which full civil rights are
accorded b : the status of one
who has attained this age
3 a : a number greater than half of a total b :
the excess of a majority
over the remainder of the total : MARGIN c : the
preponderant quantity
or share
4 : the group or political party whose votes
preponderate
5 : the military office, rank, or commission of a
major
- majority adjective
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary
OR
http://www.yourdictionary.com/cgi-bin/mw.cgi
3.
(from Cambridge International Dictionary of English)
majority (NUMBER)
noun [U]
the larger number or part of something
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=majority*1+0
4.
(oh...this one hurts!)
Majority (n.) The amount or number by which one aggregate exceeds all
other aggregates with which it is contrasted
http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/~ralph/OPTED/v003/wb1913_m.html
5.
MAJOR'ITY, n.
1. The greater number; more than half; as a majority of mankind; a
majority of votes in Congress. A measure may be carried by
a
large or small majority.
2. Full age; the age at which the laws of a country permit a young
person to manage his own affairs. Henry III. had no sooner
come to his majority, than the barons raised war against him.
3. The office, rank or commission of a major.
4. The state of being greater.
6.
Your Query of 'majority' Resulted in 3 Matches
From the AND Concise Dictionary
Displaying Items 1 through 3
Click to Hear English
Pronunciation
Definitions
majority
the age at which someone
legally
becomes an adult.
majority
the greater number; the
largest group;
the bulk.
majority
the winning margin of
votes in an
election.
AND Concise Dictionary is © (1998,1999) AND
Classification Data Ltd.,
Oxford, UK and database rights are © (1998,1999)
AND Classification Data
Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://www.allwords.com/query.php?SearchType=3&Keyword=majority&goquery=Find+it%21&Language=ENG
7.
Majority (Page: 885)
Ma*jor"i*ty (?), n.; pl. Majorities (#). [F. majorité. See Major.]
1. The quality or condition of being major or greater; superiority.
Specifically: (a) The military rank of a major. (b) The
condition of
being of full age, or authorized by law to manage one's own affairs.
2. The greater number; more than half; as, a majority of mankind; a
majority of the votes cast.
3. [Cf. L. majores.] Ancestors; ancestry. [Obs.]
4. The amount or number by which one aggregate exceeds all other
aggregates with which it is contrasted;
especially, the number
by which the votes for a successful candidate exceed those for all
other candidates; as, he is elected by a majority of five
hundred
votes. See Plurality. To go over to, ∨ To join, the majority, to
die.
http://machaut.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/WEBSTER.sh?WORD=majority
SNIP NUMBER 4
> You changed it. You changed my post
False. Tommyshit's post is intact, on news servers around the world.
You changed it. You changed my post and tried to twist it around into
something ambiguous and were caught at it.
Notice how Jeffrey attempted to change the meaning of my sentence by
snipping the 'words within a sentence'? He is so obvious.
SNIP NUMBER 5 AND HE ADMITS IT!
> I notice that you snipped part of Steve's post
Yup. I decide what goes into my posts. Liars like you don't have any
say in the
matter.
JGB
This is only the beginning. I have many more such examples which I
will add to my collection of his cut and snip tactics.
I don't think it's possible for anyone to humiliate themselves to such
an extent on here, Jeffrey is truly a punching bag for our amusement.
HUMILIATION #34
Another blatant 'flat-out' lie by Jeffrey. He denies using statistics
which deal solely with the U.S. for
world wide comparisons. I suppose he just 'forgot' the basis of
humiliation # 29/
> The only liar on here is Jeffrey G. Brown, the self-admitted liar using
> statistics that deal solely from the U.S. and claiming they represent
> the entire world
Tommyshit is lying. I have never made such a claim.
And here's the claims, proving Jeffrey is a liar:
Using statistics 'dealing solely with the U.S. and claiming that they
apply to all Whites" - his
own definition of a lie and series of lies:
Whites commit the majority of violent crime. Period. The data does not
support
your claims.
Stay stupid, lying coward.
JGB
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. Argue with reality,
moron.
JGB
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. You're a liar.
Stay stupid, lying coward...
JGB
your finding a
new catchphrase change the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Do continue making a complete jackass of yourself, won't you?
JGB
in fact, whites commit more crime than
>blacks. The "per capita" gambit is merely your clumsy way of trying to conceal
>your lie.
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period.
JGB
Whites commit more violent crime than blacks, moron. Don't argue with
me --
argue with reality (as if you'd recognize it...)
JGB
You've chosen to ignore the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Stay stupid, coward...
JGB
Explain to us, lying shitstain, how "Niggers commit the majority of
crime" when
WHITES commit "the larger number" of "the QUANTITY or NUMBER" of
crimes?
Stay stupid, feckless bigot...
JGB
Who commits the "MAJORITY" of violent crimes by YOUR definition,
shitwad? Why,
whites do, of course.
No wonder you cannot bring yourself to sign your name to your ever
more obvious
lies. Run away again, gutless fool.
JGB
There is no context that changes the statement "whites commit the
majority of
crime" into anything else, lying pinhead.
JGB
It doesn't get any easier that this. What a liar.
HUMILIATION #35
More lies from Jeffrey.
> Did I ever write that niggers commit over 50% of the violent
> crime in the U.S.? NO.
Yes, Tommyshit -- you did.
"Furthermore, I have already proven that even with ALL other races
combined- Whites, hispanics, and asians- niggers still commit over
50%
of the murders, rapes, and robberies."
-- From: "Tom Shelly, White God" <ap...@niggers.com>
-- Subject: Jeffrey's lies...one by one
-- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:41:45 -0800
-- Message-ID: <3C9D4AF9...@niggers.com>
Did I write violent crimes as you claim or did I write murders, rapes,
and robberies?
I highlighted it above to make the lie easy to spot, even for you.
I wrote that niggers commit over 50% of the murders, rapes, and
robberies.
You are attempting to change my post to agree with the FBI definition
of violent crimes to win the argument that you have been
losing for months.
Your lies are getting more and more blatant, niggerphile.
Here's Jeffrey's response admitting his ruse and attempting to diffuse
his utter humiliation but offering no defense or explanation.
Truly pathetic. Poor widdle Tommyshit is reduced to arguing semantics
-- exactly
what he accuses others of doing.
JGB
HUMILIATION #36
> I don't use those
> statistics to compare the race of offenders in violent crimes in
> comparisons between the four races in the U.S.: Whites, hispanics,
> asians, and niggers.
Nor have I. You're a lying moron, Tommyshit.
JGB
There are far too many examples to mention or post here. This is just
a flat-out, blatant lie. In fact, every single time Jeffrey
posts statistics of crime in the U.S., he uses statistics that combine
Whites and hispanics and uses them to compare crime
between the races in the U.S.
Every time.
Remember, when comparing more than two things, this is the definition
of 'majority':
Majority (n.) The amount or number by which one aggregate exceeds all
other aggregates with which it is contrasted
http://www.mso.anu.edu.au/~ralph/OPTED/v003/wb1913_m.html
HUMILIATION #37
I normally don't go over the information in Jeffrey's posts until he
is persistent enough so I didn't catch this one. Fortunately, Raptor
Man, posted this and showed what an idiot Jeffrey can be. He actually
proves the opposite of what he is trying to say, something nigger
urinal seems to do with every post.
More proof that the only way liberals and niggers lovers can make
their case is if they hide and censor the truth.
By his own post, Jeffrey proved that niggers commit 49.87688847007325%
of the violent crime
in the U.S. while being only 12% of the population.
How funny.
Wow, JGB proves blacks commit almost 50% of all crime.
Recomputed using his fiqures we get 49.87688847007325%.
Sure is close enough to call 50% in my college classes. But not in
JGB's narrow, liberal pinhead mind.
Murder and non-negligent manslaughter 8,683
Forcible rape 17,859
Robbery 72,149
-------
TOTAL 98,691
How many arrests are required before any group can be said to commit
"over 50%"
of this number?
98,691 * 0.5 = 49,345.5
Let's be generous to poor widdle Tommyshit, and round this down to
49,345. If
Tommyshit is right, the number of blacks arrested for its list of
crimes must
equal or exceed this value.
Now, what was the total number of blacks arrested in the US in 2000
for
Tommyshit's list of crimes? Again, from Table 43:
Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter 4,238
Forcible rape 6,089
Robbery 38,897
-------
TOTAL 49,224
Does the number of blacks arrested in the US for Tommyshit's list of
crimes
(49,224) equal or exceed the value required to be "over 50%" of the
total
(49,345)?
http://www.geocities.com/utahraptor88
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 -
http://www.uncensored-news.com
With NINE Servers In California And Texas - The Worlds Uncensored
News Source
HUMILIATION #38
Jeffrey actually attempts to assert that niggers have developed
writing on their own.
The result, of course, is a world-class ass whooping.
Numerous written languages have been
>developed by African peoples, including Meroitic in the Sudan, Ge'ez in
>Ethiopia, Tifinagh in Berber-speaking areas, and Bamoun in Cameroon -- just to
>name a few examples.
>
>Ignorance is a bitch, ain't it, Tommyshit?
>
>JGB
I didn't see this post by Jeffrey until Raptor Man reposted it. I've
kicked Jeffrey's ass so often on here
that it was becoming boring and I stopped reading most of his posts.
He never came up with anything new.
However, the boldness of this one and the absolute incorrectness of it
was astounding, even for a lying liberal like Jeffrey.
Except for the last claim, they all fall into the same category that
we often see among niggers living in America and their whigger
counterparts: that niggers were Egyptian. I have already posted the
numerous pages of proof that niggers were not, never have
been, and never will be Egyptians on here so I will not post it again
in this thread.
Beyond that, I'm sure anyone who has ever traveled through the north
of Africa and in Egypt, Libya, Morocco can surely attest
that the Arabs there look nothing like niggers and dislike them as
much as every other race on Earth.
What we have with the first three are Egyptian writings traveling
south (though not far) and being adopted by the indigenous
niggers who were under the slave rule of the people from the north:
the early Egyptians.
To say that niggers developed these writings is about as far a stretch
as to say that niggers developed English simply because
they were brought to America as slaves and now speak and write in
English.
Let's look at them one by one, shall we? Jeffrey's lies in italics.
including Meroitic in the Sudan
The Meroitic script was used by the Meroe people. The Meroites
adopted the Egyptian language.
Nubians were Egyptians.
NOTES AND SOURCES:
The Meroitic script is very similar to the Egyptian Writing System. It
was used by the Meroe people, a civilization
of the Sudan. The system is written from right to left, unlike the
Egyptian system which can be written right to left,
left to right, and vertically.
http://www.library.cornell.edu/africana/Writing_Systems/Meroitic.html
Meroe was an ancient state occupying the territory of the modern
Sudan. Its borders in the antiquity ran across the
Nile valley between
the third and the fifth cataracts. In the
Egyptian sources this
country most frequently was called
«the land of Kush».
This fact has greatly influenced the
formation of local
culture. The Meroites have adopted the
Egyptian language and
many ancient customs and rites of
Egypt. As well in the
VIIIth cent. BC, an independent
state had already
existed the rulers of which have
conquered - for almost
a century - Egypt. Even after
Meroe had lost the
rulership over Egypt, the Egyptian
language remained the
official language of the country
The Kingdom of Meroe
A new period in the history of Nubia began with the transferral of the
royal necropolis, which moved to just outside the royal
residence in Meroe. The ancient kingdom of Kush came to an end and
became the kingdom of Meroe.
Menroe = EGYPTIANS
Ge'ez in
>Ethiopia,
The classical language of Ethiopia, Ge'ez, was derived from the
Sabaean script. The origin of the Sabaean alphabet is from an
Arabian Alphabet.
NOTES AND SOURCES:
Ethiopic script
Origins
The Ethiopic script developed from the script of
Ethiopia's classical language, Ge'ez,
which was derived from the Sabaean/Minean script.
Sabaean alphabet
Origin
The Sabaean or Sabaic alphabet is one of the south Arabian
alphabets.
http://www.omniglot.com/writing/sabaean.htm
Tifinagh in Berber-speaking areas,
Tifinagh is part of the Berber language with is a descendant of the
Hamitic Subfamily of languages. The Hamitic Subfamily is
derived from ancient Egyptian.
NOTES AND SOURCES:
The Hamitic Subfamily
The Hamitic subfamily is generally considered to
include ancient Egyptian (see
Egyptian language) and its descendant, Coptic; the
Berber languages; and the
Cushitic languages
ancient Berber alphabet
known as Tifinagh.
http://www.teachervision.com/ce6/society/A0858548.html
THE MAIN BERBER GROUPS TODAY
Morocco
Algeria
Libya
Tunisia
Egypt
MAURITANIA
http://www.angelfire.com/az/rescon/mgcberbr.html
Bamoun in Cameroon
This language was 'created' or 'inspired' by Ibrahim Njoya, a king of
Bamum. Njoya was educated and enjoyed the company
of German Professors and men of scholar. In fact, he even betrayed
his people and aided in the continuing German conquest
of Cameroon.
In other words, the exact origin of this language is suspect and set
to be inspired by a dream and drawings of a man's hand.
The reality of it is, Njoya was educated by Whites and among Whites
during it's 'development".
It is not a true pure nigger language.
NOTES AND SOURCES:
Note: Sultan Ibrahim Njoya king of the Bamum (Bamoun) for over 40
years, was a man of genius. At the end of the nineteenth
century, he
evolved an independent system of writing for his own language as well
as for a secret "court language". He was inspired by a
dream, in which
he was told to draw a man's hand on a board and then to wash off his
drawing and drink the water. After doing this, he asked
his subjects to
draw different objects and to name them. Armed with their results, he
experimented until he had created the first writing sytem
containing
some 466 pictographic and ideographic symbols.
The Germans took over Cameroon from 1884 to 1916 and set up farming,
roads, schools, etc.
Ibrahim Njoya, was educated by the WHITE Germans and aided and helped
them.
It should however be mentionned that, in their conquest attempts, the
Germans were aided and abetted
by some Cameroonians, the most famous being : Fon Galega I of
Bali, Ibrahim Njoya
http://www.ambafrance-cm.org/lmth/camero/histoir/camall.htm
I'm sure Jeffrey and others will come up with more but most likely,
they will all be traceable to Egyptians or in the case of the
Bamoun, White influence.
How pitiful that once again, we have not only a case of liberal lying
and manipulation of history, but the spector of the negros
attempting to take on the accomplishments of other races and claim
them as their own.
The fact is: The pure-blooded African nigger has not advanced in over
6,000 years. They have not domesticated one animal,
developed writing, or even invented the wheel on their own.
They have yet to learn how to build a structure beyond the capability
of a beaver.
(Another royal-class ass whooping dished out by........)
Tom Shelly, White God
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most-Hated Racist, 2002
Jeffrey's pitiful response and his overwhelming ass kicking:
> Menroe = EGYPTIANS
The sources cited by Tommyshit make no such claim.
Tommyshit Shelly is lying -- again.
JGB
The Kingdom of Meroe
A new period in the history of Nubia began with the transferral of the
royal necropolis, which moved to just outside the royal
residence in Meroe. The ancient kingdom of Kush came to an end and
became the kingdom of Meroe.
What's the matter, Jeffrey? Don't know what to say?
hahaha
Shall I cut and paste the information on Nubia...?
Or just let you go there yourself and see what a fool you are making
of
yourself?
http://www.oi.uchicago.edu/OI/PROJ/NUB/NUBX/NUBX_brochure.html
Lie 8: "The old Egyptian language does not resemble any Caucasian
tongue,
but is linked to Somali. This is proof that the Egyptian civilization
was
not White in origin."
The Caucasian languages are the Indo-European languages, those spoken
by
the
Indo-European peoples (Germans, Balts, Slavs and Celts) who started
invading
Europe and other parts of the world, starting out from the Caucasus
mountain
region of southern Russia. They were Nordic racial types.
Although the Egyptian civilization took root after the first
Indo-European
invasion of the region around 3000 BC, the majority of the population
was
comprised of a mix of original White Mediterranean types and a number
of
Proto Nordics: the numbers of Indo-European peoples amongst them was
quite
small. In fact the Egyptians fought wars with the Indo-Europeans
twice:
once
against the 'Sea Peoples" and then against the Hittites.
So it is quite logical that the Egyptian language will not be related
to
the
Indo-European languages, as the Indo-European element would have
quickly
been swallowed up.
As to being related to "Somali" - of course what happened is that the
Blacks
in Nubia who were conquered by the White Egyptians, took on parts of
the
White Egyptian language, and this is why small parts of the languages
spoken
in Somalia, Sudan and Ethiopia may today resemble Ancient Egyptian.
But
the
Arabic influence has been far too widespread across the entire region
to
make any definite claims about this.
HUMILIATION # 39
JEFFREY G. BROWN IN ANOTHER LIE
Jeffrey G. Brown caught in yet another bold-faced, flat-out lie and
won't admit to it.
Bottom Line: Jeffrey G. Brown has been proven a liar about Mein Kampf
being legal to sell in Germany.
Who is lying, German prosecutors or Jeffrey G. Brown?
Jeffrey G. Brown.
He continues to lie just to distract people.
Keep tilting Brown.
--
Patrick W. Blakely, HSD
He's been doing this crap for seven years now. Many times he has been
caught being wrong or lying, but not once, has he had the guts to
admit he was wrong in a debate.
JGB could rescue a small bit of his credibility if he simply admits he
was wrong about the Mein Kampf thing. The fact he refuses to admit he
was wrong when German prosecutors prove him otherwise just shows he
isn't interested in truth. He is interested in trolling, flaming, and
name calling.
--
Patrick W. Blakely, HSD
I provide facts. You're a liar, little fool. That's a fact.
JGB
Yet the book is available for sale in Germany.
JGB
"Mein Kampf" is not banned in Germany. It is available for legal
purchase in
that country.
There is no evidence that "Mein Kampf" is censored in Germany, lying
bigot.
You're lying -- pure and simple. You've lied before, and you are lying
now.
JGB
The proof that JGB is a liar and too cowardly to own up to it:
(thanks to Raptor)
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/perl/story/970.html
An influential Jewish organization issued a report this week accusing
leading online book sellers, Amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com, of
selling hate books in Germany, a violation of that country's laws.
The Simon Wiesenthal Center accused both companies of selling a number
of books that are banned in Germany under that country's strict
anti-propaganda laws.
Among the titles the center said its researchers ordered and received
from the two companies were Adolph Hitler's infamous "Mein Kampf"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/massacre/Story/0,2763,204743,00.html
Displaying the swastika, owning Mein Kampf, and denying the Holocaust
are all criminal offences in Germany.
and more:
http://www.fpp.co.uk/Hitler/MeinKampf/banned1.html
selling Hitler's "Mein Kampf," which is banned along with other Nazi
propaganda in Germany.
Under German law, books espousing Nazi philosophy are banned from
public display or sale.
Violations are punishable by up to five years in prison.
"The law in Germany is clear," a ministry spokesman said. "Offering
material that
incites racial hatred with the intention of distributing it
in Germany is illegal."
http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/08/biztech/articles/09mein.html
Mueller von der Heidi, a lawyer for the 7,000-member German
Booksellers
and Publishers Association, said he believed that it was
illegal for Internet
companies to ship Nazi propaganda into Germany.
"It's not permitted to distribute 'Mein Kampf' in Germany,"
he said. "Our
members have long been forbidden to distribute this book."
Section 86 Dissemination of Means of Propaganda of Unconstitutional
Organizations
(1) Whoever domestically disseminates or produces, stocks, imports or
exports or makes publicly accessible through data storage media for
dissemination domestically or abroad, means of propaganda:
1. of a party which has been declared to be unconstitutional by the
Federal Constitutional Court or a party or organization, as to which
it has been determined, no longer subject to appeal, that it is a
substitute organization of such a party;
2. of an organization, which has been banned, no longer subject to
appeal, because it is directed against the constitutional order or
against the idea of international understanding, or as to which it has
been determined, no longer subject to appeal, that it is a substitute
organization of such a banned organization;
3. of a government, organization or institution outside of the
territorial area of application of this law which is active in
pursuing the objectives of one of the parties or organizations
indicated in numbers 1 and 2; or
4. means of propaganda, the contents of which are intended to further
the aims of a former National Socialist organization,
shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a
fine.
HUMILIATION #40
Jeffrey is caught in a bold faced, flat-out lie and smear against me.
Nothing more obviously exposes his petty tactics than this
humiliation:
> Since Jeffrey only posted a part of the message, which he is prone to
> do, he makes one believe that I was submitting that niggers commit over
> 50% of the crime in the U.S.
"Furthermore, I have already proven that even with ALL other races
combined- Whites, hispanics, and asians- niggers still commit over
50%
of the murders, rapes, and robberies."
-- From: "Tom Shelly, White God" <ap...@niggers.com>
-- Subject: Jeffrey's lies...one by one
-- Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2002 19:41:45 -0800
-- Message-ID: <3C9D4AF9...@niggers.com>
Why are you still lying about your own claims, Tommyshit?
JGB
Notice obviously how Jeffrey equates:
'over 50% of the crime in the U.S.'
with
'over 50% of the murders, rapes, and robberies' ?
And in so doing, he attempts to portray me as a liar when in fact, it
is him all along who
lies and manipulates and misquotes as clearly evidenced by this
misquote and obvious smear above.
I deserve an apology which I'm sure will not be forthcoming.
Tom Shelly, White God
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most Hated Racist, 2002
HUMILIATION #41
Jeffrey is caught not only lying again but blatantly exposing his
double-standard mentality.
Typical of liberals and whiggers, they have double standards for
everything. One thing I've noticed about Jeffrey is that it really
pisses him off when we use statistics from Sub-Saharan Africa and make
broad, generalized statements about crime, poverty,
living conditions, etc. ...but he has no qualms about using statistics
from the U.S. to make his comparitive statements about
niggers and Whites.
Could it just be that the nigger population in the U.S. is 12%
compared to 99% in sub-Saharan Africa? Gee..I
wonder..hahah! No wonder he wishes to liberally use comparisons in
the U.S. and shut out all the statistics from Africa. After
all, what person would make one on one comparisons with such
population disparities without adjusting per capita unless they
have something to hide?
Here we have Jeffrey lamenting about his own tactics:
Subject:
Re: 1 out of 4 niggers has AIDS
Your subject header is a lie, Tommyshit. Thanks for being a dishonest
imbecile
in public -- yet again.
JGB
The subject line is not a lie. Here's the proof:
One in every four Sub-Saharan African adults are infected with AIDS.
Source: UN 1998 World Population Prospects.
Now, just how many times have you posted material without stating that
it only includes the U.S.....hmmm? Why can't I post
material without stating that it only includes sub Saharan Africa? At
least in this post, I had the decency to include in the
message that it is in Sub-Saharan Africa. When you post such broad
statements, you hardly ever indicate that it only includes
the U.S. where the niggers are outnumbered by 9 to 1.
Let's look at some examples of you posting statements as facts when
they only pertain to the U.S.. (after all, the internet is
world-wide, is it not?)
Here's some examples below:
HUMILIATION #34 EXAMPLE
Another blatant 'flat-out' lie by Jeffrey. He denies using statistics
which deal solely with the U.S. for
world wide comparisons. I suppose he just 'forgot' the basis of
humiliation # 29/
> The only liar on here is Jeffrey G. Brown, the self-admitted liar using
> statistics that deal solely from the U.S. and claiming they represent
> the entire world
Tommyshit is lying. I have never made such a claim.
And here's the claims, proving Jeffrey is a liar:
Using statistics 'dealing solely with the U.S. and claiming that they
apply to all Whites" - his
own definition of a lie and series of lies:
Whites commit the majority of violent crime. Period. The data does not
support
your claims.
Stay stupid, lying coward.
JGB
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. Argue with reality,
moron.
JGB
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. You're a liar.
Stay stupid, lying coward...
JGB
your finding a
new catchphrase change the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Do continue making a complete jackass of yourself, won't you?
JGB
in fact, whites commit more crime than
>blacks. The "per capita" gambit is merely your clumsy way of trying to conceal
>your lie.
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period.
JGB
Whites commit more violent crime than blacks, moron. Don't argue with
me --
argue with reality (as if you'd recognize it...)
JGB
You've chosen to ignore the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Stay stupid, coward...
JGB
Explain to us, lying shitstain, how "Niggers commit the majority of
crime" when
WHITES commit "the larger number" of "the QUANTITY or NUMBER" of
crimes?
Stay stupid, feckless bigot...
JGB
Who commits the "MAJORITY" of violent crimes by YOUR definition,
shitwad? Why,
whites do, of course.
No wonder you cannot bring yourself to sign your name to your ever
more obvious
lies. Run away again, gutless fool.
JGB
There is no context that changes the statement "whites commit the
majority of
crime" into anything else, lying pinhead.
JGB
It doesn't get any easier that this. What a liar.
HUMILIATION #29 EXAMPLE
In his own words and by his own standards, Jeffrey proves himself to
be a liar and dishonest
and unashamedly uses a double-standard. His hypocrisy is evident
below:
JEFFREY'S OWN STANDARDS OF A LIE:
Note that in its latest series of lies, Tom Shelly is quoting
statistics dealing
solely with Africa but claiming that these statistics apply to "all"
blacks.
The dishonesty of the mindless bigot can be no better illuminated
than by Shelly's deliberately misleading claims.
JGB
you've switched to African statistics. You lie when you use them to
support
claims about "all" blacks. You will be reminded of your dishonesty
frequently, Tommy
he takes numbers derived from a small
part
> of Africa and claims that they apply to all blacks.
>
> Tommy is just as stupid a liar as you are, coward.
>
> JGB
> Shall I post the statistic that niggers commit 90% of ALL crime in Africa
...and then claim that this proves that blacks commit 90% of ALL
crime, as you
have before?
Sure, lying coward, go ahead. Why should I care that you are stupid
enough to
repeat your lies?
JGB
JEFFREY'S STATEMENTS MEETING HIS OWN STANDARDS AND DEFINITION OF A
LIAR:
Using statistics 'dealing solely with the U.S. and claiming that they
apply to all Whites" - his
own definition of a lie and series of lies:
Whites commit the majority of violent crime. Period. The data does not
support
your claims.
Stay stupid, lying coward.
JGB
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. Argue with reality,
moron.
JGB
Of course I can deny that, because it isn't true. Whites commit more
violent
crimes than blacks.
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period. You're a liar.
Stay stupid, lying coward...
JGB
your finding a
new catchphrase change the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Do continue making a complete jackass of yourself, won't you?
JGB
in fact, whites commit more crime than
>blacks. The "per capita" gambit is merely your clumsy way of trying to conceal
>your lie.
Whites commit more crimes than blacks -- period.
JGB
Whites commit more violent crime than blacks, moron. Don't argue with
me --
argue with reality (as if you'd recognize it...)
JGB
You've chosen to ignore the fact that whites commit more crimes than
blacks.
Stay stupid, coward...
JGB
Explain to us, lying shitstain, how "Niggers commit the majority of
crime" when
WHITES commit "the larger number" of "the QUANTITY or NUMBER" of
crimes?
Stay stupid, feckless bigot...
JGB
Who commits the "MAJORITY" of violent crimes by YOUR definition,
shitwad? Why,
whites do, of course.
No wonder you cannot bring yourself to sign your name to your ever
more obvious
lies. Run away again, gutless fool.
JGB
There is no context that changes the statement "whites commit the
majority of
crime" into anything else, lying pinhead.
JGB
AFTER ALL HIS LYING, JEFFREY CHALLENGES PEOPLE TO PROVE HE LIES:
AND ONLY PROVES HIS OWN HYPOCRISY AND INABILITY TO DEBATE
WITHOUT RESORTING TO LIES.
How strange, then, that you are utterly unable to cite a single
instance in
which I have lied.
Stay stupid, shitstain.
JGB
since you're a bigot and a liar. Obfuscation and deception are
your stock in trade. But it will be fun watching you try to pretend
otherwise..
JGB
Keep lying, moron. It's amusing to see just how blatantly dishonest
your hate
can make you.
JGB
You have no credibility because you are a liar, little fool. You are a
liar
because you are a bigot, and bigots *must* lie to support their
"arguments".
There is no context that can change you from a liar into an honest
man. You've
already made the decision to lie. Now you have to live with the
consequences of
your moral incompetence.
JGB
What *is* it about you bigots that makes lying such an integral part
of your
nature?
JGB
Like all bigots, the anonymous coward "Jasper" *must* lie to support
its
arguments.
JGB
Tom Shelly, White God
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most Hated Racist, 2002
HUMILIATION #42
It was discovered that Jeffrey was employed part time as a consultant
at an iMac store at a mall in the
Cincinnati area. The manager and owner must have been surprised when
they learned that Jeffrey was using their computers to harass and
leave hate messages and threat messages while he was supposed to
be working and helping customers. Not only that but the other stores
at the mall and the security manager of the mall were informed as
well, for their own protection.
Apparently, Jeffrey is no longer 'affliated' with the iMac store
anymore.
This little bit of news sparked off a round of laughter from the regs
on AFN, all at Jeffrey's expense and humiliation:
DID YOU LOSE YOUR JOB?
> > > >: > > >>
> > > >: > > >> hahahahah!
> > > >: > > >> hahah!
> > > >: > > >>
> > > >: > > >> hahahahahahahhaha
> > > >: > > >> hahahahahha
> > > >: > > >> hahah
> > > >: > > >
> > > >: > > >
> > > >: > > >
> > > >: > > >hahahahahhahahahhaha
> > > >: > > >hahahahahah
> > > >: > > >
> > > >: > > >hahahahahahhahahahhahahhahahahaha
> > > >: > > >
> > > >: > >
> > > >: > >
> > > >: > > hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
> > > >: > >
> > > >: > > hahahahahahahahahahahaha
> > > >: > >
> > > >: > > hahahahahaha.......
> > > >: >
> > > >: > hahahahahhaahhahha
> > > >: >
> > > >: > hahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha......
> > > >: >
> > > >: > hahahhhahaha
> > > >:
> > > >: hahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha
> > > >:
> > > >: hahahahhahahaha
> > > >: hahah
> > > >: hahahah
> > > >: hahahahhahahahahahahahhahaha
> > > >:
> > > >: hahahahahhahahahahahahhahahaha
> > > >: hahahahah
> > > >:
> > > >: bye bye Jeffrey!
> > > >: haha
> > > >:
> > > >:
> > > >: hahahahahahhahaha
> > > >: hahahahahha
> > > >:
> > >
> >
> >
> ahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha
>
> > h
> > > >ahahahhahahahahah
> > > >:
> > > >: ahahha
> > > >: ahahha
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > >Another white, liberal, nigger-lover goes down!
> > > >LOL
> > > >AAAHAHAHAHA.
> > > >One down, several to go.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > hahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
> > >
> > > hahahahahahahaha
> > >
> > > hahahahahahaha
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > hahahaha
> >
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
> >
> > hahahahahah
> >
> > hahahah
> >
> >
> > hahahahahahahahahahah
> >
> >
>
> h
> hahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahh
>
> ahaha
> hahah
> hahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahah
> hahhahaha
> hahahahah
> hahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahhahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahah
> hahahahhahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahaha
>
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha
>
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha
>
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha
>
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahaha
> hahaha
> hahaha
> ahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahaha
> hahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahah
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahah
> hahahahhahaha
> hahahahahahah
> hahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahaha
> hahahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahhaahahahhahahahahhah
> hahahahahhahaha
>
> hahahhahahaha
hahahahaha
hahahahahahahha
ahahaha
ahahaha
ahahha
aahhaha
aahhahaha
>>hahahahahahhahahahhahahhahahahaha
>>
>
>
>hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
>
>hahahahahahahahahahahaha
>
>hahahahahaha.......
hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahaha.......hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahaha.......hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahaha.......hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahaha.......hahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahaha.......
HUMILIATION #43
Thanks to James Riske, we now find out that Jeffrey's middle name is
Goehring and that his wife was being sued for the paltry sum of $150.
How utterly embarrassing and humiliating. No wonder he is so full of
hate.
> > Hamilton County Clerk of Courts > >17311549 CASE DOCKET LISTING 00CV30632 F > > > > > >KEATING RITCHIE & SWICK vs. SUSAN ANN BROWN et al > > > >Attorney - Plaintiff PL1 JOHANNA HUTCHINS 69759 > > > >Attorney - Defendant > >Judge - > > > >(PL1) KEATING RITCHIE & SWICK 8050 HOSBROOK ROAD SUITE 200 > > CINCINNATI OH 45236 > > Plaintiff > > vs. > >(DE1) SUSAN ANN BROWN 8357 SUMMIT RIDGE > > CINCINNATI OH 45255 > >(DE2) JEFFERY GOEHRING BROWN 8357 SUMMIT RIDGE > > CINCINNATI OH 45255 > > Defendants > >Filed:11/22/2000 Amount: $150.00 > > > >----------------------------------------------------------- > >QUANTITY AMOUNT TOTAL DESCRIPTION > >1 63.00 63.00 CIVIL SUIT > >2 7.00 14.00 NEW SERVICE - CERTIFIED MAIL > >1 2.00 2.00 ORDINARY MAIL WAIVER > > ------- > > 79.00 PLAINTIFF - P0 COSTS > > > > > >IMAGE DATE DESCRIPTION > >----------------------------------------------------------- > > 12/4/2000 SUMMONS SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL > > DATE SERVED: 11-30-00 > > ADDRESSEE: JEFFERY GOEHRING
BROWN > > AUTHORIZED AGENT: SUSAN BROWN > > > > 12/11/2000 FAILURE OF SERVICE. UNCLAIMED. > > SUMMONS RETURNED ON 12-11-00 > > ADDRESSEE: SUSAN ANN BROWN > > ORDINARY MAIL ISSUED. CERT OF MAILING FILED. > > APPEARANCE AND ANSWER DATE: 01-11-01 > > > >186 3/7/2001 ENTRY OF SATISFACTION AT PLAINTIFF'S COST. > > JUDGE: RALPH E WINKLER > > > >32 11/30/2001 ENTRY OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT > > PLAINTIFF'S COSTS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. > > JUDGE: ALLEN/NADINE > > AS TO JEFFERY GOEHRING ONLY
HUMILIATION # 44
Here we find out that the State of Ohio had to get after Jeffrey's
wife, Susan Brown for back taxes:
Looks like the State of Ohio had to get after Susan again.
http://www.courtclerk.org/aps/ttl/lns/smcpb113.asp?CJ98007195
CJ Case Info
Judg filing date: 09/11/1998 Volume/Page: 98-007195
Court issuing judgment: TAX COMMISSION
County: FRANKLIN State: OHIO
Caption: STATE OF OHIO VS. BROWN,SUSAN A
Case #: Ser#3972590040 Judgment or decree rendered: 09/11/1998
Creditor: STATE OF OHIO
Debtor: SUSAN A BROWN
Judg. Amt.: $14,741.39 Interest rate: 10.00%
Date interest begins: 09/11/1998 Receipt number:
Filing Charge: $16.00 Making CJ charge: $5.00
Costs: Attorney:
Date Additional Information Amount
09/11/1998 WITHHOLDING ACCT # 290567418 SERIAL # 3972590040
HUMILIATION #45
And here's the State of Ohio again, going after Susan Brown for back
taxes.
She's such a liberal and wants everyone else to pay taxes to pay for
her programs to help the poor niggers and the environment but doesn't
want to pay for them herself.
She must get her hypocrisy from her husband, Jeffrey.
http://www.courtclerk.org/aps/ttl/lns/smcpb113.asp?CJ97005996
CJ Case Info
Judg filing date: 07/17/1997 Volume/Page: 97-005996
Court issuing judgment: TAX COMMISSION
County: FRANKLIN State: OHIO
Caption: STATE OF OHIO VS. BROWN, SUSAN A
Case #: SER # 3970420054 Judgment or decree rendered: 07/17/1997
Creditor: STATE OF OHIO
Debtor: BROWN, SUSAN A
Judg. Amt.: $22,933.38 Interest rate: 10.00%
Date interest begins: 07/17/1997 Receipt number: 4002-9999
Filing Charge: $15.00 Making CJ charge:$ $6.00
HUMILIATION #46
Still more tax evasion by the liberal, nigger-loving Browns. They
want everyone else's money to go to 'poor niggers' and the
underprivleged but run like hell when the tax man comes knocking on
their door. He doesn't even pay to renew his license plates.
What hypocrits.
And here we find out that Jeffrey drives a piece of shit car.
This is hilarious!
Jeffrey drives a little piece of shit 2 door Toyota with plates
expired 4 months prior!
Ohio License Plate:
XKP780
You know the guy, you see him on the freeway in the fast lane doing 50
MPH. The old beat up Toyota with expired plates driven by a loser
fat middle aged guy.
THAT'S OUR JEFFREY!
4 month expired plates! Can you believe it! I guess Jeffrey
couldn't affort the $50 to renew them!
haha
hahaha
ahahah
hahah
TICKET INQUIRY > Ticket #:
75/3240257 Item: 5 > Case #: > Date: 05/08/2000 07:45 AM > Location:
4100 MARBURG AV CINC HA > Status: INACTIVE > Disp: PAID OUT > Disp
Date: 05-12-2000 > Section: 503-52/CMCN UNAUTHORIZED LIC PLATES >
Charge: 3071 LICPL LAW VIOL > Facts: LICPL EXPIRED 052600 (EBS) >
Plate: XKP780 OH Expires: 12/00 > Make/Model: TOYO 2DR > Officer:
THOMPSON/GILBERT/W/JR Badge: P0579 > Amt Received: 56.00 > Date
Received: 05/12/2000 > Defendant: BROWN/JEFFREY/G > Address: 8357
SUMMITRIDGE > : CINC OH 45255 > DOB: 03/13/1955 Sex: M > Ht: 604 Wt:
245 > Eyes: BLUE Hair: BROWN > -----------------JOURNAL >
--------------------------------------------------- > --- 5/8/2000
CITED > 5/8/2000 WHEN OCCURED DATE/TIME > 5/8/2000
HUMILIATION #47
Here we find Jeffrey and Susan ripping off their Dentist.
What deadbeats. Don't these people have a conscience?
CASE #2:
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts
2788530 CASE DOCKET LISTING 97CV03348 F
LAURENCE LAZARUS DDS vs. JEFFREY G BROWN
Attorney - Plaintiff PL1 JOEL S MOSKOWITZ 19297
Attorney - Defendant
Judge -
(PL1) LAZARUS LAURENCE DDS 7440 MONTGOMERY RD
CINCINNATI OH 45236
Plaintiff
vs.
(DE1) BROWN JEFFREY G 8357 SUMMITRIDGE DR
CINCINNATI OH 45255
(DE2) BROWN SUSAN 8357 SUMMITRIDGE DR
CINCINNATI OH 45255
Defendants
Filed:2/6/1997 Amount: $208.00
-----------------------------------------------------------
QUANTITY AMOUNT TOTAL DESCRIPTION
2 6.50 13.00 NEW SERVICE - CERTIFIED MAIL
1 44.00 44.00 CIVIL SUIT - UNDER $500
1 2.00 2.00 ORDINARY MAIL WAIVER
-------
59.00 PLAINTIFF - P0 COSTS
IMAGE DATE DESCRIPTION
-----------------------------------------------------------
2/18/1997 SUMMONS SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL
DATE SERVED: 02-13-97
ADDRESSEE: JEFFREY G BROWN
AUTHORIZED AGENT: BROWN SUSAN
2/18/1997 SUMMONS SERVED BY CERTIFIED MAIL
DATE SERVED: 02-13-97
ADDRESSEE: BROWN SUSAN
AUTHORIZED AGENT: BROWN SUSAN
48 3/19/1997 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT FILED.
DEFAULT JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF FOR $ 208.00
INTEREST $ AND COSTS.
DATE SIGNED: 03-19-97
JUDGE: JOHN WEST
HUMILIATION #48
Here we find that Jeffrey and Susan don't even pay their mortgage
payments on time.
news:se8f1vg912uv94e63...@4ax.com... > On Sun, 05 Jan
2003 01:52:25 GMT, Talamasca <jamesk...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > >
>Notice of default and Intention to sell > > > >Please submit all back
mortgage payments immediately or we will be > >forced to seek
foreclosure remedies in the Chancery Court of > >Cincinnati. The bank
is really getting pissed. > > > hahahahahhahaha > > Go Here: >
http://www.courtclerk.org/ > Plug In jeffrey G Brown in the search bar
or just Jeffrey Brown. Lots > of > info!!!! > > > CASE #1: > >
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts > 2761806 CASE DOCKET LISTING
96CV10327 F > > > TRF INC vs. JEFFREY G BROWN > > Attorney - Plaintiff
PL1 TERRENCE M VEITH 18349 > > Attorney - Defendant > Judge - > >
(PL1) TRF INC 11679 DEERFIELD RD > CINCINNATI OH 45242 > Plaintiff >
vs. > (DE1) BROWN JEFFREY G 8357 SUMMIT RIDGE > CINCINNATI OH 45255 >
(DE2) BROWN SUSAN A 8357 SUMMIT RIDGE > CINCINNATI OH 45255 >
Defendants > Filed:4/23/1996 Amount: $3,625.35 > >
HUMILIATION #49
Jeffrey's wife Susan rips off American Express.
Are these people con artists or just hypocrital whiggers who want
everyone else to carry their weight?
http://www.courtclerk.org/aps/ttl/lns/smcpb113.asp?CJ97008563
CJ Case Info
Judg filing date: 10/15/1997 Volume/Page: 97-008563
Court issuing judgment: MUNICIPAL
County: HAMILTON State: OHIO
Caption: AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SER VS. SUSAN A BROWN
Case #: 97CV15713 Judgment or decree rendered: 08/21/1997
Creditor: AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES CO INC
Debtor: SUSAN A BROWN
Judg. Amt.: $6,938.64 Interest rate: 10.00%
Date interest begins: 08/21/1997 Receipt number:
Filing Charge: $16.00 Making CJ charge: $0.00
Costs: $81.50 Attorney: RANDY T SLOVIN
HUMILIATION #50
Still more people have to sue the Browns to get them to pay up like
decent people would.
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts
17311549 CASE DOCKET LISTING 00CV30632 F
KEATING RITCHIE & SWICK vs. SUSAN ANN BROWN et al
Attorney - Plaintiff PL1 JOHANNA HUTCHINS 69759
Attorney - Defendant
Judge -
(PL1) KEATING RITCHIE & SWICK 8050 HOSBROOK ROAD SUITE 200
CINCINNATI OH 45236
Plaintiff
vs.
(DE1) SUSAN ANN BROWN 8357 SUMMIT RIDGE
CINCINNATI OH 45255
(DE2) JEFFERY GOEHRING BROWN 8357 SUMMIT RIDGE
CINCINNATI OH 45255
Defendants
Filed:11/22/2000 Amount: $150.00
-----------------------------------------------------------
QUANTITY AMOUNT TOTAL DESCRIPTION
1 63.00 63.00 CIVIL SUIT
2 7.00 14.00 NEW SERVICE - CERTIFIED MAIL
1 2.00 2.00 ORDINARY MAIL WAIVER
-------
79.00 PLAINTIFF - P0 COSTS
HUMILIATION #51
Even Susan's company and her Jew partner, Bill Abramovitz, can't pay
their bills and people are forced to sue them.
Typical liberal, Jew nigger lovers: hypocrits who hide behind lies
and propaganda.
-------------------------
Hamilton County Clerk of Courts
Schedules APPEARANCE DOCKET A 0205149
Attorney - Plaintiff TIMOTHY G MARA 15459
Attorney - Defendant
Judge - RICHARD A NIEHAUS 33
BLUE CHIP TECHNOLOGY vs. MEDIA FORCE
Filed: 7/8/2002 H740 - BREACH OF CONTRACT- OC
Total Deposits $182.00 CR Total Costs $192.50
10527564 BLUE CHIP TECHNOLOGY INC DBA HQ GLOBAL WORKPLACE
Plaintiff(s)
vs.
10527565 MEDIA FORCE INC CARE OF IDEOPIA
10527706 SUSAN BROWN
10527709 BILL ABRAMOVITZ
Defendant(s)
IMAGE DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
-----------------------------------------------------------
7/8/2002 INITIAL CASE DEPOSIT PAID BY TIMOTHY G MARA 175.00-
Doc 7/8/2002 CLASSIFICATION FORM FILED.
Doc 7/8/2002 COMPLAINT FILED
7/8/2002 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO SUSAN BROWN
7/8/2002 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO BILL ABRAMOVITZ
7/8/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO SUSAN BROWN
7/8/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO BILL ABRAMOVITZ
7/9/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO MEDIA FORCE INC CARE OF
IDEOPIA
7/9/2002 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO MEDIA FORCE INC CARE OF
IDEOPIA
7/10/2002 JUDGE ASSIGNED CASE ROLLED TO NIEHAUS/RICHARD/A PRIMARY
Doc 7/12/2002 NOTICE TO TIMOTHY G MARA AS TO UNDELIVERED SERVICE ON
BILL
ABRAMOVITZ SERVICE TYPE: CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE REASON CODE: NO
FOWARDING
ORDER ON FILE
Doc 7/12/2002 NOTICE TO TIMOTHY G MARA AS TO REFUSED SERVICE ON MEDIA
FORCE
INC CARE OF IDEOPI SERVICE TYPE: CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE REASON CODE:
REFUSED
Doc 8/2/2002 NOTICE TO TIMOTHY G MARA AS TO UNCLAIMED SERVICE ON SUSAN
BROWN
SERVICE TYPE: CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE REASON CODE: UNCLAIMED
10/18/2002 ISSUE DESK - POSTAGE DEP. BY TIMOTHY MARA 7.00-
Doc 10/18/2002 WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REGULAR MAIL SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND
COMPLAINT ON MEDIA FORCE INC, SUSAN BROWN
Doc 10/18/2002 WRITTEN REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE OF SUMMONS
AND
COMPLAINT ON BILL ABRAMOVITZ
Doc 10/24/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL TO MEDIA FORCE INC CARE
OF
IDEOPIA
Doc 10/24/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL TO SUSAN BROWN
Doc 10/24/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL WITH WAIVER TO BILL
ABRAMOVITZ
10/25/2002 REGULAR MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO MEDIA FORCE INC CARE OF
IDEOPIA
10/25/2002 REGULAR MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO SUSAN BROWN
10/25/2002 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO BILL ABRAMOVITZ
10/30/2002 CERTIFICATE OF REGULAR MAIL FILED. MEDIA FORCE INC CARE OF
IDEOPIA
10/30/2002 CERTIFICATE OF REGULAR MAIL FILED. SUSAN BROWN
Doc 11/14/2002 NOTICE TO TIMOTHY G MARA AS TO UNDELIVERED SERVICE ON
SUSAN
BROWN SERVICE TYPE: CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE REASON CODE: INSUFFICIENT
ADDRESS
Doc 11/14/2002 NOTICE TO TIMOTHY G MARA AS TO UNDELIVERED SERVICE ON
MEDIA
FORCE INC CARE OF IDEOPI SERVICE TYPE: REGULAR MAIL SERVICE REASON
CODE:
INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS
Doc 11/26/2002 CERTIFIED MAIL SERVICE RETURNED; UNCLAIMED SERVICE AS
TO BILL
ABRAMOVITZ
Doc 11/26/2002 SUMMONS ISSUED BY REGULAR MAIL TO BILL ABRAMOVITZ
11/26/2002 REGULAR MAIL SERVICE ISSUED TO BILL ABRAMOVITZ
12/2/2002 CERTIFICATE OF REGULAR MAIL FILED. BILL ABRAMOVITZ \
HUMILIATION #52
"A Tom Shelly, White God Exclusive!"
The picture of Jeffrey's confirmed wife, Susan Brown was located by
Tom Shelly and posted to usenet.
As suspected, she is a plain, obese manish woman. Extremely
unappealing.
But what's worse, she was found to be in some sort of mock jail
raising money for a liberal cause.
What about her own taxes? The Dentist? Jeffrey's license plate? The
mortgage? My God!
What hypocrits!
Picture to follow in next post.
HUMILIATION # 53
THE FINAL HUMILIATION
After exposing his deadbeat lifestyle and posting the picture of his
wife and the Jew corporations they are affiliated with and all the
creditors that are after them, Jeffrey has stopped posting.
( I didn't even have to post their credit report which is quite
scary....)
A year or so ago, he challenged that I wouldn't be able to run him off
usenet and he taunted me regarding the issue.
Well....who's laughing now, Jeffrey?
This is proof that if you keep going after nigger lovers and whiggers,
you will ultimately win. Just stick to the truth and doggedly pursue
it. Like cockroaches that scatter when you turn on the kitchen
light, liberals run when you turn the truth on them.
Here's the unanswered post that proves clearly that I completely and
totally kicked Jeffrey Goehring Brown's ass off usenet and made him my
bitch.
> > My God, I have never seen anyone so totally humiliated and taken down
> > to such low depths as Jeffrey G. Brown, AKA JGB.
> >
> > Thanks to proud, pure-blooded White men like I.M. White, James Riske
> > and myself...we were able to find out the true nature of just who
> > Jeffrey really was and give him the ultimate humiliation: posting
> > pictures of the manly pig he was fucking once a month: his wife,
> > informing his boss that he was illegally spreading hate on the
> > internet instead of doing his job of peddling Apple computers to
> > people who didn't need them, and beating down his liberal arguments
> > one by one and line by line.
> >
> > Jeffrey used to be real confident on here, slinging his insults and
> > defending the Jews and niggers with the full force of all he could
> > muster. He would spend hours at his computer thinking he was doing
> > some good; thinking that he actually had meaning and consequence in
> > the world. He was proudly posting on alt.revisionism and
> > alt.flame.niggers and even participating in real lawsuits.
> >
> > Wow....he was a liberal that was going places!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > And then we came along.....
> >
> > I told Jeffrey right from the beginning that I would run his liberal
> > whigger ass right off the internet and he taunted me. He told me that
> > he would laugh at me and 'repost' the message to taunt me.
> >
> > Well....Jeffrey, just who is laughing now, huh?
> >
> > ME!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your fat, ugly whigger worthless piece of 240 pounds of lard ass is
> > run off in utter humiliation isn't it?
> >
> > Oh please, post a reply..crawl out of your hole....let's see you show
> > your ugly face on here some more because we're not done with
> > you..we're not done humiliating and exposing your ass. You left too
> > soon, coward. I'm not done beating the living shit out of you, I
> > haven't had the pleasure of seeing you piss your pants as my whip
> > slings through the air to crack on your fat, whigger ass over and over
> > and over again. You got up and ran away after only a few lashings. I
> > was just warming up you coward.
> >
> >
> > If you're not discouraged by me finding the picture of your ugly-ass,
> > tree hugging, worthless drain on society fat ass bitch wife picture on
> > the internet...just imagine what I would do with your families'
> > pictures? huh?
> >
> > hahaha
> > hahah
> >
> > Better yet, we now know where the fat cow lives, don't we?
> >
> >
> >
> > I was just warming up, whigger boy, and you left. Where's your sense
> > of honor? Your sense of courage? Are you going to leave so soon? Don't
> > you want revenge? Come on, whigger boy.....I'm challenging you..come
> > out of your hole and fight me. Look at all I've done to you, how much
> > I've humiliated you. Are you just going to sit there and do nothing?
> > Aren't you a man? Come out and face me!
> >
> > I'm right here and ready to put your whigger liberal ass to the
> > ground.
> >
> > Bring it on or lose whatever self respect you have left.
> >
> > This post, if left unreplied to on your part, will be on your usenet
> > gravestone, you pansy ass liberal pussy.
Yet another liberal nigger lover humiliated and run off by...
Tom Shelly, Undefeated White God
Purveyor of Truth
Proud Recipient
AFN's Most Hated Racist, 2002 & 2003
Tom Shelly, White God
<strato...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>Check his posts, he never responded to attacks on third parties or attacked
>third parties.
hahahah
Opps!
He would jump in on threads all the time, moron.
Tom Shelly, White God
Jason James
I'm talking about f a m i l y,..get it dullard.
Jason James
Jason James
Go ahead, show where he has commented on your family.
Jason James
Tavish
kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>Is that how you "win debates", you filthy scum?
Arthur J. Tandy aka Black Knight aka Joe Bruno is certainly violent-- it's no
wonder he's been fired numerous times for (as he admits here): "my firings had
nothing to do with my legal knowledge, idiot. They were what happens frequently
in business-personality conflicts."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=594c8e48.0210040807.77d712f1%40posting.google.com&rnum=18
From: kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight)
Subject: REPOST-Matthews Plays the Lying Ignorant Fool
Date: 4 Oct 2002 09:07:41 -0700
Message-ID: <594c8e48.02100...@posting.google.com>
<<Did everyone notice Arthur J. Tandy said "my firings" which indicates he's
been fired more than once and in the same link Allan Matthews pointed out:
"I suppose this explains why the BrunoMoron, by its own admission, has been
fired at least twice." IOW Arthur J. Tandy appears to have mental problems.>>
phil small p
> Repost of that triumphant day when Jeffrey Goehring Brown was exposed
> and run off usenet.
>
> http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=4958
is this loser at it again?Proof that tom shithead shouldn't breed.or
in-breed,as the case may be.