"John Hammer's" Abuse of Usenet

15 views
Skip to first unread message

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to


John Hammer's Abuse of Usenet, Libel and Forgeries


Anyone following Usenet recently will know that "Hammer" has changed
tactics. At first, I thought his purpose was to attempt to make light
of the fact that the National Alliance ship is sinking. With recent
defections from the bogus Pierce cult, and more and more of Pierce's
supporters finding out about his work with the BATF, "Hammer" (Vincent
Breeding of Tampa, Florida) has a right to be angry. For
once, our movement was able to work together to isolate and expose
a known informant. Normally, it takes good men to be betrayed and
find themselves in jail before the word spreads about a federal
informant. But William Pierce has weathered even this. He has been
responsible for many good men rotting in jail to this day, and
thanks to the Internet, he was able to reach others who simply
didn't know. With Breeding's new found pseudo name "John Hammer" and a

world of people not aware of his past, he was able to yet again
practice his treachery.

You see, Breeding doesn't care if Pierce loses supporters or that some

of his suckers will learn the truth about him and stop donating
to Pierce's bogus legal funds and his bogus organization. You see,
this is not how "John Hammer" makes his money. Breeding is a known
informant for the BATF and derives his income from them, not from his
couple of misled followers. Of course he likes to take vacations
courtesy of the White resistance, but this blood money comes and goes
but his paycheck doesn't.

Remembering this, one need only look at Usenet to find all the proof
one needs. "Hammer's" recent forgery spree is childish and vulgar. It
is the kind of behavior one would expect from a pimple faced 14 year
old needing attention but not allowed to play with the older kids.
Everyone knows that the forgeries are "Hammer's" work, even though he
playfully denies it, no one is fooled. So why do it? Why waste so
much time forging posts and making a ass of himself? Why not? He
simply doesn't care what you or I feel about him. His job is to
disrupt the operations of legitimate White resistance groups. Endless
squabbling, name calling, vulgarities, and libel mixed with occasional
news worthy postings give our resistance the look of a bunch of
morons without a possible hope of solving the fundamental problems
facing Whites around the world. It gives the browser a feeling of
satisfaction that everything the media says about the White
resistance is true and they will not have to adjust their thinking.

We must remember what are "John Hammer's" goals, then, and only then,
will we understand why he acts the way that he does. There is nothing
one can say to a infiltrator to get them to stop their activities.
Especially if their actions are successful. There is nothing we can
say to them because we are not them. We have opposite motives and
thus we must understand that we are fighting the infiltrators as much
as we are fighting the Jews, homos, various non-Whites and soul sick
Whites. Only by understanding this can we hope to survive government
interference and only through working to rid ourselves of these
parasites can we hope to win the hearts and minds of our people.

Harold A. Covington
http://www.nswpp.org

"Freedom means the right to say that two plus two equals four. Once
this is achieved, all else follows." - George Orwell, 1984


for further info contact http://www.nswpp.org


__
/\_\
/ / /_
/ /_/\ \
_\ \/ \ \
/\ \ /\ \_\
\ \/ \ \/_/
\ /\ \_\
\/_/ / /
/ / /
\/_/

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 1, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/1/98
to

Hey, guys....I can keep this ridiculous bullshit up just as
long as you can.

You've had over a year of it now, and you have accomplished
nothing whatsoever other than to make complete and utter
fools of yourselves and completely discredit Dr. Pierce and
the National Alliance, although I doubt you have the
intelligence to realize that.

Guys, you're NOT going to run me off the Internet, and you'd
best go back to whoever is winding you up and/or paying you
to do this and tell them so.

I'm tired of it, and everybody on these newsgroups is tired
of it. I don't suppose there's ANY chance we could kick
off the New Year with a resolution to stop posting ridiculous
crap to Usenet?

(Sigh).....I didn't think so.

Harold A. Covington
www.nswpp.org

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

[Tom Metzger is a drunkard. The kind of man who gets his courage out
of a vodka bottle. This is a quality the White resistance
needs more of, so that my job as a Federal infiltrator and agent
provocateur will be made easier. I have always laughed at men like
Tom. Men who take a pratfall and who make fools of themselves are
worth 100 do somethings to my mission. They are always the object of
covert support and encouragement by the system. They are the men who
break under the storm and live and die following their wallets.

I recently asked Tom to write something regarding the uncomfortable
truths heaped on him by Harold Covington and Harold's revolutionary
NSWPP. Asking a man to defend himself against spurious attacks is
always difficult, which is why I make so many spurious attacks on
Harold. I myself, feel rather uncomfortable answering truthful claims
against me as I believe that they give the accuser creditability. (You
will note that I cannot spell "credibility".)

But, the winds of change are blowing. For once, the White resistance
has organized itself to expose a known infiltrator whose principle aim

is to confuse and disrupt the effort to free our people---me.
Infiltrators like me don't care about how people will react to our
words. Our job is simply to confuse, disrupt and mis-direct the
energies of your organizations. We don't care if our supporters
quit, because our money comes not from their supporters, but from
our employers. And there are always new suckers to bleed and
demoralize.

In this epic time of change I have asked Mr. Metzger to once again
babble to his people. I humbly welcome Mr. Tom Metzger to the
NSWPP.com forum. -JH]


Tom Metzger Shets The Recurd Shtraight


The Cooper memorandum, as usual, was totally twisted and reshaped to
mean what it really means. That's becaush Harold is out to get me.
You're all out to get me. If the word master means the Metzgers were
legally lynched in Oregon, that is true. When my attackers say the
Dees operation was able to seize the Metzger family home, business and
tools used in the business operation, that is true also. When it is
revealed that Tom Metzger's wife of over 20 years died in the process
at least partialy due to the accumulated stress, that is true also.
When it is revealed that Tom Metzger finally crumpled under the
pressure and retreated into a vodka bottle, that is true as well. If
my enemies wish to point out that Tom Metzger led several street
actions throughout the period of his involvement, but has since become
a virtual recluse hiding from anyone who might ask him uncomfortable
questions about his obscene "arrangement" with Morris Dees, then
that's true as well. Hell, it's ALL true! Every goddamn word Harold
Covington has ever written about me is true! That's why I am so
pisshed off.

I must point out that no man or woman was ever seriously injured or
jailed that were under my command. How, exactly, this is relevant to
any of the charges which have been brought against me or the massive
amount of evidence that I am handing my mail over to Morrish Deeze I
don't know, but I just tought I'd trow dat in dere. Also that Tom
Metzger was always at the head of his troops, unlike Benny Klassen who
was always giving head to his troops.

Yes, I have been jailed also as has been my son John for FREE SPEECH
AND ASSEMBLY. That was many years ago and I goddamned well expect a
free ride for it from the rest of you bums for the remainder of my
life. Tom Metzger has always operated a business also that supported
his family. Like selling the videotaped sound of my own voice. Yes,
Tom Metzger has for the past fifteen years or so lived off the right
wing like some I know who haven't held down a job or ran another
business for at least 20 years. Hell, that asshole Pierce has never
worked a day in his LIFE so far as anybody knows.
To these varifiable facts, I plead not guilty by reason of
intoxication. Tom Metzger has been hauled before several grand juries
and never talked or stayed in the court room for over 5 minutes; I was
always too drunk. Even when threatened with contempt of court. I just
offered the judge a drink and like all good lawyers he couldn't
resist. Perhaps these things are a sign of my treason, but I don't
remember. Actually I don't remember much of anything these days, like
how the hell that tattoo of a myna bird got on my butt. GOD, I was
smashed that week.....

My main accusers seem to be the persons of Harold Covington
and Dr. Victor Frankenstein, who keeps sending that goddamned
hunchback asshole Igor to try and steal my brain because it's already
pickled. Chiropractor who hasn't straightened a spine since the
sixties, if then. I have none to straighten, though, so who cares? He
is the man that both Robert J. Matthews and George Lincoln Rockwell
both hated as the phoney that he is---well, actually, that's not true,
but if I keep on repeating it I can make all you Movement idiots
think it is. You're all a bunch of damned fools and jerkoffs. Where
wash I?

For those that know of these men and their act of
telling the truth about me and Bill Pierce, I rest that case. I
don't have time to open all the dirt in my files on these two men.
Come to think of it, I don't have any files on these two men.
I don't have much of anything, but I will have another beer!

As far as my aledged betrayal to Morris Deeze, I find that the
most truthful charge ever made. One with which must afford both Dees
and his Federal friends immense laughter. Well, they should laugh at
me. I'm a drunken stumblebum who has betrayed my own people rather
than admit I can't get out from under this goddamned civil judgment,
leave the Movement, and become a pauper like Harold Covington did when
faced with a similar frovolous and malicious lawsuit. Harold is
smarter than me, he got out of his lawsuit, but that gawd
damn....(sniff, sniff)...it just isn't fair...you all hate
me....everybody's against me....(slurp)... my life is shit,
man.....I'm old and tired and caught like a rat in
a trap....(honk! bawl! sob!)

Where wuz I? Oh, yeah. I suppose I got to come up with some
stoopid gimmick to try and convince people that Harold is lying about
me, which ain't gonna be easy because he's telling the trooth.
Lezzeee... okay, got it....how's dis?

I will pay in cash to anyone who can show a check, or money
order endorsed by any agent of Morris Deeze $1,000. Deeze, of course,
doesn't actually collect the mail, his legally appointed agents do,
and they just rubber stamp the back of the checks with an account
number, so I'm safe there. I will also pay $1,000 to anyone who can
show evidence of anyone but Tom or John Metzger in possesion of key
to box 65 or taking mail or cash from that box. Of course, I will
simply call anyone who DOES produces any such evidence a liar and an
agent of Horrible Harold and refuse to pay, or more likely ignore it
altogether. Come to think of it, Rick Cooper already HAS produced
such evidence...hell, he don't need a thousand bucks. Also, I will pay
$1,000 in cash to anyone who can produce evidence that anyone but Tom
or John Metzger open and read all mail. That's $3,000 cash waiting for
Covington or Fields to collect or shut up. Sez
me. Of course, all this is just blowing smoke and does not seriously
address one single allegation substantively, but then I never have
done that and I never will. I can't. The charges are all true.

Will Deeze and his agents continue to harrass the Metzgers?
Yes, if and when they are able. Will the aliens who abducted me last
week and performed strange reproductive experiments on my tubby,
booze-sodden body return? Almost certainly? The Metzgers were not
born yesterday, which is a stupid thing to say when you think about
it, but it sounds cutsey. And so far Deeze reconized the fact that he
had better go after more easy picking for his own good. Oh, yeah. I am
in the tough-talking stage of drunkenness now. I be tough....I be
BAAAAD....(slurp)

In the mean time, anyone in the right wing who wishes to make
these charges to Tom Metzger's face had better prepare themselves for
the fight of their life. Oh, lissen to how BAAAAAAD I be....of course,
I have known where Harold Covington lives for many years now. "A
Certain Someone" always keeps me informed, and God knows I have
broadcast Harold's address by mail and on the Internet often enough,
hoping some Jew or nigger or weak-minded Skinhead kid like Ren Herler
will have the guts to do what I am too much of a yellow
dog, drink-sodden, windbag, cowardly piece of shit to do myself.

OH, GOD, WHO AM I KIDDING....?

DAMN IT, I NEVER WANTED THIS TO HAPPEN....(sob).....I JUST
FEEL SO TRAPPED......WHY IS EVERYBODY AGAINST ME? WHY.....uuuuuuh....
muddafukka.....(snore)

TOM METZGER White Alcoholic Resistance


*****************************************************************************

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

HITLER'S SOCIAL REVOLUTION
by Gen. Leon Degrelle

In this excerpt from his memoirs General Leon Degrelle, former
leader of the Belgian contingent of the Waffen-SS, describes how Adolf
Hitler gained the enthusiastic support of the working people of
Germany.

One of the first labor reforms to benefit the German workers
was the establishment of annual paid vacation. The Socialist French
Popular Front, in 1936, would make a show of having invented the
concept of paid vacation, and stingily at that, only one week per
year. But Adolf Hitler originated the idea, and two or three times as
generously, from the first month of his coming to power in 1933.

Every factory employee from then on would have the legal right
to a paid vacation. Until then, in Germany paid holidays where they
applied at all did not exceed four or five days, and nearly half the
younger workers had no leave entitlement at all. Hitler, on the other
hand, favored the younger workers. Vacations were not handed out
blindly, and the youngest workers were granted time off more
generously. It was a humane action; a young person has more need of
rest and fresh air for the development of his strength and vigor just
coming into maturity. Basic vacation time was twelve
ays, and then from age 25 on it went up to 18 days. After ten years
with the company, workers got 21 days, three times what the French
socialists would grant the workers of their country in 1936.

These figures may have been surpassed in the more than half a
century since then, but in 1933 they far exceeded European norms. As
for overtime hours, they no longer were paid, as they were everywhere
else in Europe at that time, at just the regular hourly rate. The work
day itself had been reduced to a tolerable norm of eight hours, since
the forty-hour week as well, in Europe, was first initiated by Hitler.
And beyond that legal limit, each additional hour had to be paid at a
considerably increased rate. As another innovation, work breaks were
made longer; two hours every day in order to let the worker relax and
to make use of the playing fields that the large industries were
required to provide.

Dismissal of an employee was no longer left as before the the
sole discretion of the employer. In that era, workers’ rights to job
security were non-existent. Hitler saw to it that those rights were
strictly spelled out. The employer had to announce any dismissal four
weeks in advance. The employee then had a period of up to two months
in which to lodge a protest. The dismissal could also be annulled by
the Honor of Work Tribunal. What was the Honor of Work Tribunal? Also
called the Tribunal of Social Honor, it was the third of the three
great elements or layers of protection and defense that were to the
benefit of every German worker. The first was the Council
of Trust. The second was the Labor Commission.

The Council of Trust was charged with attending to the
establishment and the development of a real community spirit between
management and labor. In any business enterprise, the Reich law
stated, the employer and head of the enterprise, the employees and
workers, personnel of the enterprise, shall work jointly towards the
goal of the enterprise and the common good of
the nation.

Neither would any longer be the victim of the other not the
worker facing the arbitrariness of the employer nor the employer
facing the blackmail of strikes for political purposes. Article 35 of
the Reich labor law stated that: Every member of an Aryan enterprise
community shall assume the responsibilities required by his position
in the said common enterprise. In other words, at the head of the
company or the enterprise would be a living, breathing executive in
charge, not a moneybags with unconditional power. The interest of the
community may require that an incapable or unworthy
employer be relieved of his duties

The employer would no longer be inaccessible and all-powerful,
authoritatively determining the conditions of hiring and firing his
staff. He, too, would be subject to the workshop regulations, which he
would have to respect, exactly as the least of his employees. The law
conferred honor and responsibility on the employer only insofar as he
merited it.

Every business enterprise of 20 or more persons was to have
its Council of Trust. The two to ten members of this council would be
chosen from among the staff by the head of the enterprise. The
ordinance of application of 10 March 1934 of the above law further
stated: The staff shall be called upon to decide for or against the
established list in a secret vote, and all salaried employees,
including apprentices of 21 years of age or older, will take part in
the vote. Voting shall be done by putting a number before the names of
the candidates in order of preference, or by striking out certain
names.

In contrast to the business councils of the preceding régime,
the Council of Trust was no longer an instrument of class, but one of
teamwork of the classes, composed of delegates of the staff as well as
the head of the enterprise. The one could no longer act without the
other. Compelled to coordinate their interests, though formerly
rivals, they would now cooperate to establish by mutual consent the
regulations which were to determine working conditions.

Belgian author Marcel Laloire, who observed conditions in the
Reich first hand, wrote The Council has the duty to develop mutual
trust within the enterprise. It will advise on all measures serving to
improve the carrying out of the work of the enterprise and on
standards relating to general work conditions, in particular those
which concern measures tending to reinforce feelings of solidarity
between the members themselves and between the
members and the enterprise, or tending to improve the personal
situation of the members of the enterprise community. The Council also
has the obligation to intervene to settle disputes. It must be heard
before the imposition of fines based on workshop regulations.

Before assuming their duties, members of the Work Council had
to take an oath before all their co-workers to carry out their duties
only for the good of the enterprise and of all citizens, setting aside
any personal interest, and in their behavior and manner of living to
serve as model representatives of the enterprise. [Article 10,
paragraph 1 of the law.] Every 30th of April, on the
eve of the great national labor holiday, council duties ceased and the
councils were renewed, pruning out conservatism or petrifaction and
cutting short the arrogance of dignitaries who might have thought
themselves beyond criticism.

It was up to the enterprise itself to pay a salary to members
of the Council of Trust, just as if they were employed in the work
area, and to assume all costs resulting from the regular fulfillment
of the duties of the Council.

The second agency that would ensure the orderly development of
the new German social system was the institution of the Workers’
Commissioners. They would essentially be conciliators and arbitrators.
When gears were grinding, they were the ones who would have to apply
the grease. They would see to it that the Councils or trust were
functioning harmoniously to ensure that regulations of a given
business enterprise were being carried out to the letter.

They were divided among 13 large districts covering the
territory of the Reich. As arbitrators they were not dependent upon
either owners or workers. They had total independence in the field.
They were appointed by the state, which represented both the interests
of everyone in the enterprise and the interests of society at large.

In order that their decisions should never be unfounded or
arbitrary, they had to rely on the advice of a Consulting Council of
Experts which consisted of 18 members selected from various sections
of the economy in a representation of sorts of the interests of each
territorial district.

To ensure still further the objectivity of their arbitration
decisions, a third agency was superimposed on the Councils of Trust
and the 13 Commissioners, the Tribunal of Social Honor.

Thus from 1933 on, the German worker had a system of justice
at his disposal that was created especially for him and would
adjudicate all grave infractions of the social duties based on the
idea of the Aryan enterprise community. Examples of these violations
of social honor are cases where the employer, abusing his power,
displayed ill will towards his staff or impugned the honor of his
subordinates, cases where staff members threatened work harmony by
spiteful agitation; the publication by members of the Council of
confidential information regarding the enterprise which they
became cognizant of in the course of discharging their duties.
Thirteen Tribunes of Social Honor were established, corresponding with
the thirteen commissions.

The presiding judge was not a fanatic; he was a career judge
who rose above disputes. Meanwhile the enterprise involved was not
left out of the proceedings; the judge was seconded by two assistant
judges, one representing the management, another a member of the
Council of Trust.

This tribunal, the same as any other court of law, had the
means of enforcing its decisions. But there were nuances. Decisions
could be limited in mild cases to a remonstrance. They could also hit
the guilty party with fines of up to 10,000 marks. Other very special
sanctions were provided for that were precisely adapted to the social
circumstances; change of employment, dismissal of the head of the
enterprise or his agent who had failed in his duty. In case of a
contested decision, the legal dispute could always be taken up to a
Supreme Court seated in Berlin a fourth level of protection.

From then on the worker knew that exploitation of his physical
strength in bad faith or offending his honor would no longer be
allowed. He had to fulfill certain obligations to the community, but
they were obligations that applied to all members of the enterprise,
from the chief executive down to the messenger boy. Germany’s workers
at last had clearly established social rights that were arbitrated by
a Labor Commission and enforced by a Tribunal of Honor. Although
effected in an atmosphere of justice and moderation, it was a
revolution.

This was only the end of 1933, and already the first effects
could be felt. The factories and shops large and small were reformed
or transformed in conformity with the strictest standards of
cleanliness and hygiene; the interior areas, so often dilapidated,
opened to light; playing fields constructed; rest areas made available
where one could converse at one’s ease and relax during rest periods;
employee cafeterias; proper dressing rooms.

With time, that is to say in three years, those achievements
would take on dimensions never before imagined; more than 2,000
factories refitted and beautified; 23,000 work premises modernized;
800 buildings designed exclusively for meetings; 1,200 playing fields;
13,000 sanitary facilities with running water; 17,000 cafeterias.
Eight hundred departmental inspectors and 17,300 local inspectors
would foster and closely and continuously supervise these renovations
and installations.

The large industrial establishments moreover had been given
the obligation of preparing areas not only suitable for sports
activities of all minds, but provided with swimming pools as well.
Germany had come a long way from the sinks for washing one’s face and
the dead tired workers, grown old before their time, crammed into
squalid courtyards during work breaks.

In order to enure the natural development of the working
class, physical education courses were instituted for the younger
workers; 8,000 such were organized. Technical training would be
equally emphasized, with the creation of hundreds of work schools,
technical courses and examinations of professional competence, and
competitive examinations for the best workers for which large prizes
were awarded.

To rejuvenate young and old alike, Hitler ordered that a
gigantic vacation organization for workers be set up. Hundreds of
thousands of workers would be able every summer to relax on and and
sea. Magnificent cruise ships would be built. Special trains would
carry vacationers to the mountains and to the seashore. The
locomotives that hauled the innumerable worker-tourists in
just a few years of travel in Germany would log a distance equivalent
to fifty-four times around the world!

The cost of these popular excursions was nearly insignificant,
thanks to greatly reduced rates authorized by the Reichsbank.

Didn't these reforms lack something? Were some of them flawed
by errors and blunders? It is possible. But what did a blunder amount
to alongside the immense gains?

That this transformation of the working class smacked of
authoritarianism? That’s exactly right. But the German people were
sick and tired of socialism and anarchy. To feel commanded didn’t
bother them a bit. In fact, people have always liked having a strong
man guide them. One thing for certain is that the turn of mind of the
working class, which was still almost two-thirds non-Nazi in 1933, had
completely changed.

The Belgian author Marcel Laloire would note: "When you make
your way through the cities of Germany and go into the working-class
districts, go through the factories, the construction yards, you are
astonished to find so many workers on the job sporting the Hitler
insignia, to see so many flags with the Swastika, black on a bright
red background, in the most populous districts." The Labor Front that
Hitler imposed on all of the workers and employers of the Reich was
for the most part received with favor.

And already the steel spades of the sturdy young lads of the
National Labor Service could be seen gleaming along the highways. The
National Labor Service had been created by Hitler out of thin air to
bring together for a few months in absolute equality, and in the same
uniform, both the sons of millionaires and the sons of the poorest
families. All had to perform the same work and were subject to the
same discipline, even the same pleasures and the same physical and
moral development. On the same construction sites and in the same
living quarters, they had become conscious of their commonality, had
come to understand one another, and had swept away their
old prejudices of class and caste. After this hitch in the National
Labor Service they all began to live as comrades, the workers knowing
that the rich man’s son was not a monster, and the young lad from the
wealthy family knowing that the worker’s son had
honor just like any other young fellow who had been more generously
favored by birth. Social hatred was disappearing, and a socially
united people was being born.

Hitler could already go into factories something no man of the
so-called Right before him would have risked doing and hold forth to
the mob of workers, tens of thousands of them at a time, as in the
Siemens works. In contrast to the von Papens and other country
gentlemen, he might tell them, In my youth I was a worker like you.
And in my heart of hearts, I have remained what I was then. In the
course of his twelve years in power, no incident ever occurred at any
factory Adolf Hitler ever visited. When Hitler was among the people,
he was at home, and he was received like the member of
the family who had been most successful.


"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

The Malevolent Jobholder
by (the superb and brilliant) H. L. Mencken


From the American Mercury, June, 1924, pp. 156-59.

*****************************************

In the immoral monarchies of the continent of Europe, now happily
abolished by God's will, there was, in the old days of sin, an
intelligent and effective way of dealing with delinquent
officials. Not only were they subject, when taken in downright
corruption, to the ordinary processes of the criminal laws;
in addition they were liable to prosecution in special courts
for such offenses as were peculiar to their offices.

In this business the abominable Prussian state, though
founded by Satan, took the lead. It maintained a tribunal
in Berlin that devoted itself wholly to the trial of
officials accused of malfeasance, corruption, tyranny
and incompetence, and any citizen was free to lodge a
complaint with the learned judges.

The trial was public and in accord with rules fixed by law.
An official found guilty could be punished summarily and in
a dozen different ways. He could be reprimanded, reduced in
rank, suspended from office for a definite period, transferred
to a less desirable job, removed from the rolls altogether, fined,
or sent to jail. If he was removed from office he could be
deprived of his right to a pension in addition, or fined or
jailed in addition. He could be made to pay damages to any
citizen he had injured, or to apologize publicly.

All this, remember, was in addition to his liability under
ordinary law, and the statutes specifically provided that
he could be punished twice for the same offense, once in
the ordinary courts and once in the administra reflection upon
the polizei, and by inference, upon the Throne, the
whole monarchical idea, and God.

But in America, even if they had no other sentiment in
common, which would be rarely, judge and prisoner would
often be fellow Democrats or fellow Republicans, and
hence jointly interested in protecting their party
against scandal and its members against the loss of
their jobs.

Moreover, the Prussian system had another
plain defect: the punishments it provided were,
in the main, platitudinous and banal. They lacked
dramatic quality, and they lacked ingenuity and
appropriateness. To punish a judge taken in
judicial crim. con. by fining him or sending him
to jail is a bit too facile and obvious. What is
needed is a system (a) that does not depend for
its execution upon the good-will of fellow jobholders,
and (b) that provides swift, certain and unpedantic
punishments, each fitted neatly to its crime.

I announce without further ado that such a system,
after due prayer, I have devised. It is simple, it
is unhackneyed, and I believe that it would work. It
is divided into two halves. The first half takes the
detection and punishment of the crimes of jobholders
away from courts of impeachment, congressional smelling
committees, and all the other existing agencies - i.e.,
away from other jobholders - and vests it in the
whole body of free citizens, male and female.

The second half provides that any member of that body,
having looked into the acts of a jobholder and found
him delinquent, may punish him instantly and on the spot,
and in any manner that seems appropriate and convenient -
and that, in case this punishment involves physical damage
to the jobholder, the ensuing inquiry by the grand jury or
coroner shall confine itself strictly to the question whether
the jobholder deserved what he got.

In other words, I propose that it shall be no longer
malum in se for a citizen to pummel, cowhide, kick,
gouge, cut, wound, bruise, maim, burn, club, bastinado,
flay or even lynch a jobholder, and that it shall be malum
prohibitum only to the extent that the punishment exceeds
the jobholder's deserts.

The amount of this excess, if any, may be determined
very conveniently by a petit jury, as other questions
of guilt are now determined. The flogged judge, or
Congressman, or other jobholder, on being discharged
from hospital - or his chief heir, in case he has
perished - goes before a grand jury and makes complaint,
and, if a true bill is found, a petit jury is empaneled
and all the evidence is put before it. If it decides that
the jobholder deserves the punishment inflicted upon him,
the citizen who inflicted it is acquitted with honor.
If, on the contrary, it decides that this punishment
was excessive, then the citizen is adjudged guilty of
assault, mayhem, murder, or whatever it is, in a degree
apportioned to the difference between what the jobholder
deserved and what he got, and punishment for that excess
follows in the usual course.

The advantages of this plan, I believe, are too patent
to need argument. At one stroke it removes all the legal
impediments which now make the punishment of a recreant
jobholder so hopeless a process, and enormously widens the
range of possible penalties. They are now stiff and, in
large measure, illogical; under the system I propose they
could be made to fit the crime precisely. Say a citizen
today becomes convinced that a certain judge
is a jackass - that his legal learning is defective,
his sense of justice atrophied and his conduct of cases
before him tyrannical and against decency. As things
stand, it is impossible to do anything about it.

A judge cannot be impeached on the mere
ground that he is a jackass; the process is far
too costly and cumbersome, and there are too many
judges liable to the charge. Nor is anything to be
gained by denouncing him publicly and urging all good
citizens to vote against him when be comes up for
reelection, for his term may run for ten or fifteen
years, and even if it expires tomorrow and he is defeated
the chances are good that his successor will be quite
as bad, and maybe even worse.

Moreover, if he is a Federal judge he never comes
up for reelection at all, for once he has been appointed
by the President of the United States, on the advice of
his more influential clients and with the consent of
their agents in the Senate, he is safe until he is so
far gone in senility that he has to be propped on the
bench with pillows.

But now imagine any citizen free to approach him in
open court and pull his nose. Or even, in aggravated cases,
to cut off his ears, throw him out of the window, or knock
him in the head with an ax. How vastly more attentive
he would be to his duties! How diligently be would
apply himself to the study of the law! How careful
he would be about the rights of litigants before him!
How polite and even suave he would become! For judges,
like all the rest of us, are vain fellows: they do not
enjoy having their noses pulled. The ignominy resident
in the operation would not be abated by the subsequent
trial of the puller, even if he should be convicted
and jailed.

The fact would still be brilliantly remembered that at
least one citizen had deemed the judge sufficiently a
malefactor to punish him publicly, and to risk going
to jail for it. A dozen such episodes, and the career
of any judge would be ruined and his heart broken,
even though the jails bulged with his critics. He
could not maintain his air of aloof dignity on the
bench; even his catchpolls would snicker at him behind
their hands, especially if be showed a cauliflower ear,
a black eye or a scar over his bald head. Moreover, soon
or late some citizen who had at him would be acquitted
by a petit jury, and then, obviously, he would have to
retire. It might be provided by law, indeed, that he
should be compelled to retire in that case-that an
acquittal would automatically vacate the office of
the offending jobholder.


"Mightier than the tread of marching armies is the
power of an idea whose time has come!" - Victor Hugo

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

[I considered running this with all kinds of caveats and
disclaimers, but what the hell? The author probably intended this as
comedy, but there's many a true word in jest. It's not likely to
incite anyone to violence, since American White males don't fight any
more, they write their Congressman or bitch to a radio talk show host
or hire a lawyer to file a malicious lawsuit. I figure that once--
just once--I am going to publish what everybody in this country
with any remaining sense of decency truly feels in their heart, no
matter what their race or political persuasion. I'll probably
get all kinds of flak---so what else is new? Enjoy! - WS]

Take the Ceausescu Challenge!
by Mustapha Gormsby

The vermin on Capitol Hill are stealing over half of your income,
eroding away your rights and taking our country on a fast track
to the Third World. These miserable thrice-damned whoresons will
never stop unless we stop them! It's time to:

KILL THEM ALL NOW!

How can we kill them all now? Any way you like. You could hang
them, behead them, roast them over an open fire, strangle them
with your bare hands (very satisfying), impale them, sell them
to a vivisectionist (profitable), run them over with a large
vehicle once or with a small vehicle several times, stab them,
shoot them, burn them at the stake, string them up with piano wire,
chop them up with an axe (don't use your good chef's knife or you
could notch the blade), bury them up to their necks near an anthill
and pour honey on them, use them for chum when you go shark fishing
or any other method that you can imagine.

The more horrible it is, the better you will feel about it.

Don't we need politicians and bureaucrats for anything?

Nope. They don't even make good firewood, so there's really
no good use for them at all. Remember, these people have
stolen a substantial part of your income for the last 80 years.
They have spent even more than they have stolen, leaving the
country with a 5 trillion dollar debt! They have stolen property
from innocent people and used the law as an instrument of plunder
and tyranny. Do we need them? No, but they need us. Without us
to bleed, they wouldn't be able to live because they are incapable
of producing anything for themselves. The miserable bastards
don't deserve to live.

Scum! Vicious, conniving, baby-eating vermin! They must die, die,
DIE! KILL THEM ALL NOW!


*What Would We Do Without Them?*

Live like free men instead of slaves, that's what. When this country
was founded people knew about things like natural rights. Now these
festering, swilling pigs at the public trough have decided that
the people of this country have too much freedom and that it is
up to them to curtail it!

BASTARDS!!!!! Who do they think they are? Eighty years ago the budget
was small enough to be paid for on what the government collects today
even if you got rid of all personal income taxes! But these horrific
sons-of-bitches just keep taking and taking as if there was no limit
to what we could tolerate.

*Is There Any Precedent for Killing Them All Now?*

Yes! All over the world and throughout history, people who have
suffered at the hands of corrupt politicians have eventually said
enough is enough. The French Revolution was a fine example of what to
do with politicians out of control. The people of Romania, having
suffered under the communist dictatorship of Nicolae Ceausescu for too
many years, finally dragged him out into the street and shot him and
his bitch-dog slut of a wife through the head, an event which was
videotaped and shown on national television to the thunderous cheers
of the multitudes and which causes real Americans to heave a sigh of
envy.

TAKE THE CEAUSESCU CHALLENGE!

Are you tired of being told how to live? Of being told what you
can and cannot eat, smoke, drink or do with your property? Are
you tired of the government taking away your money and spending
it on more government? Are you sick and tired of the fact that
every time you turn around another thing you enjoy has been
outlawed? There's only one solution:

KILL THEM ALL NOW!

Hurry, before the United States starts looking like Mexico, Brazil or
the Soviet Union. March on your state capitol with pitchforks and
torches. Lock the bastards in and burn the place down. Then march on
Washington D.C. and do the same.

That is where the real evil is. You cannot vote these people out of
office, because the new ones you vote in will begin to look like the
old ones within just weeks. They are a slime and they spread like
malaria. They are a disease! Voting won't do any good, it's time to
KILL!

*Just The Elected Officials?*

No! The number of elected Federal officials is limited to congress,
the president and the vice president. That's only 537 people. The
Federal bureaucracy numbers in the millions; between the military, the
IRS, BATF, CIA, FBI, EPA, DEA, FDA and all of the other bureaus and
departments, you've got millions of people who have power over YOUR
LIFE and you never elected them! My god, the POST OFFICE!! Don't let
them escape:

KILL THEM ALL NOW!

Filthy, horrible, miserable, statist, liberal, feminist, pervert,
politically correct, lying, thieving, baby-killing vermin SCUM!!!!!

If you don't kill them all now there's no telling what they might do
to you next. They could use your children to feed starving peasants in
India. They could sell your wife or husband to the British to pay
off part of their debt. They might turn your children into prostitutes

for the government to help continue to fund PBS! Do you want your
children to become Barney's whores?!

NOTHING IS SACRED TO THESE VERMIN! THEY ARE EVIL!!!!!!

For most of the 20th century, these stinking, loathsome, festering,
boil-ridden, poor excuses for life forms have been bleeding the
American people dry. And not just at home! The government of the
United States has screwed over plenty of people around the world. Not
only that, but these shifty-eyed, mindless, drooling, horrible,
vicious, evil, demonic, flea-bearing, pestilent, snivelling, whining,
toadying, child-molesting power mongers are the world's NUMBER ONE
CAUSE OF APOPLEXY!!!!!!! THEY'LL STEAL YOUR CHILDREN AND SACRIFICE
THEM IN BIZARRE SATANIC RITUALS!

They must be stopped. Voting won't stop them, petitioning won't stop
them, ballot initiatives won't stop them.

Bullets will stop them!
Baseball bats will stop them!
Pitchforks will stop them!
Skinning them alive will stop them!

The only thing that will stop them dead is DEATH!

*Isn't Killing Them All Now Kind of Drastic?*

NO! They signed up for the job. They stole from you, they lied to you,
they stole from you some more, they destroyed the town you live in,
they caused the increase in crime across the country, Mister Rogers
has been brainwashing your children to make blind obedient followers
of them!

They are evil and they must be killed!

Don't let another day of their depredations go by unchallenged!

KILL THEM ALL NOW!

Yours etc. GRE (Mrs.)
Somewhere USA
Have a nice day.


[GOD, THAT FELT GOOD!! - HAC]


"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

Courtesy of Greg Bobkiewicz

"The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud..."

"Babylonian Talmud", published by the Boston Talmud
Society,
p. XII

The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish
peoples, as "Gentiles", "Goyim". Let's see what the Jewish Talmud
teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who
are not part of Jahveh's "Chosen People":

"The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans.
They are beasts."

Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

"The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor
the the dog more than the non-Jew."

Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30

"Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human
form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore
he will be served by animals in human form."

Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855

"A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal."

Coschen hamischpat 405

"The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs."

Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b

"Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they
compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human."

Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b

"If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog."

Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b

"If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not
express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: "God will
replace 'your loss', just as if one of his oxen or asses had died"."

Jore dea 377, 1

"Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between
animals."

Talmud Sanhedrin 74b

"It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile."

Sepher ikkarim III c 25

"It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians
belong to the denying ones of the Torah."

Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5

"A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands."

Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b

"Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing
the same as making a sacrifice to God."

Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772

--
The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE [K. H. VI]

"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its mantle
of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis Parker
Yockey, IMPERIUM

Further info: http://www.nswpp.org


NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

[from RESISTANCE #116, May 23rd, 1997]

LIBERAL HYPOCRISY AT NPR

Well, I think it’s about time for my annual bash
at National Public Radio. You know, those smarmy liberals
who get their own radio channel, very largely at taxpayers’
expense, on which to proffer us their fly-blown ideological
wares intermixed with tinkly little spurts of New Age music
and discreet sponsorship by corporate giants like Archer
Daniels Midland. These geeks irritate me even more than
the usual run of the liberal mill, possibly because they
keep interrupting the classical music programs twice a day
with four solid hours of leftist propaganda at a whack.

It seems that NPR is at it again, same thing we
reported last year—not practicing what they preach, at least
according to their female and monkoidal employees. If you’re
black or female and you work at NPR it’s becoming the done
thing to sue your employer. There have been a number of
famous "sex discrimination" suits at NPR in the past,
notably those brought by Mara Liasson, Cokie Roberts and
Nina Totenberg. It’s just been revealed that two years ago
NPR reporter Katie Davis sued for $1.2 million she claimed
was "owed" to her because they “failed to promote her to a
permanent position”. I wonder how many White men working
at jobs as contractors on into their second or third years on
promise of permanent hire “next month for sure” would get
away with suing?

A female recording engineer named Susan Klein filed
a $600,000 suit on the grounds that NPR "discriminated" against
her by refusing her medical insurance. (She had cancer at
the time, but that was a mere detail.) By the way, if some
of these names sound kosher, they are. What we’re seeing
here is a broadcast version of "Whiplash! Oy vay, whiplash!"

NPR’s policy seems to be to pay off the yentas to
shut them up but stonewall and hang tough when De Brothuhs
try to get into the act. I’m always interested in how the
dynamics of the PC pecking order work. For one thing, there
aren’t that many blacks at supposedly liberal NPR, a fact
which has not escaped the notice of the local NAACP in
Washington, who are making ooks and eeks about filing a
discrimination suit. In January, a black recording
technician named Preston Brown filed an EEOC complaint
claiming that NPR had failed to give him training on all
their fancy new high-tech equipment because of his race.

The network’s only black foreign reporter, a Muslim
named Sunni Khalid, has also sued claiming he isn’t being
paid enough. Interestingly, Khalid also claims that Jews
on NPR’s staff habitually refer to Arabs as "rag heads"
and this makes it difficult for him to function in his job,
assigned as he is to Cairo. One wonders why?

Nina Totenberg, now acting as NPR spokesperson,
claims that all the discrimination suits are bogus because
"NPR is an equal opportunity abuser". (No, I am not making
this up.) But then Nina already got her bundle in her out
of court settlement some years ago. Maybe she could be
persuaded share some of the loot with De Bloods.

-Harold A. Covington



[RESISTANCE is the weekly newsletter of the National Socialist
White People's Party. E-mail ns...@mindspring.com for subscription
details.]




"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

YOU TOO CAN BE A HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR!

Becoming a Holocaust survivor will open millions of new
horizons for you! A wide range of specialty fields in Shoah Business
are open to you through the college of Hebrew Youth Public Education
(HYPE.)

*Learn DOCUMENTATION ALTERATION where you can make ANYONE into
a wanted Nazi war criminal! Special instruction from former Soviet
KGB operatives, the folks who gave our industry the famous,
one-of-a-kind "Demjanjuk SS ID card"!

*Major in KOSHER ACCOUNTING, the most creative
number-crunching system ever evolved, where everything add up to six
million!

*Make your fortune in the lucrative field of REPARATIONS
RACKETEERING! Learn how to extort money from the European country
of your choice by finding "Nazi gold" hidden in every bank account!

*Get into the incredibly profitable HOLOCAUST BOOK BUSINESS!

A hose nose and one of our diplomas will certify you as a HOLOCAUST
EXPERT. In addition to the book sales there are the lecture tours,
the media appearances, the guest speaker circuit at fancy-schmancy
Holocaust drinkie-dos, and above all those eye-popping CONSULTANCY
FEES! Being a recognized Holocaust maven is a license to print money!

*Learn HOLOCAUST MUSEUM MANAGEMENT and have your own personal
fantasy land! Maybe even build your own Holocaust theme park complete
with weekend package tours in an authentic replica Nazi concentration
camp, complete with striped suits, wash-off tattooed numbers, and
SS-uniformed "guards"!***

*Like to travel? Then become a professional WAR CRIMES
WITNESS!

At graduation from HYPE you will receive a diploma, a tattoo
(your social security number, but no one will ever be so impolite as
to point it out), and your MEAL TICKET FOR LIFE!

Fairy tales CAN come true! It can happen to you at Hebrew
Youth Public Education......


***************


***This was ACTUALLY ATTEMPTED some years ago by a Jewish entrepeneur.
Swear to God!




"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

[Courtesy of Thomas Stear]

KWANZAA'S FRAUDULENT ROOTS

An Opinion by Tony Snow

WASHINGTON -- Blacks in America have suffered an endless series of
insults and degradations, the latest of which goes by the name of
Kwanzaa.

Ron Karenga (a/k/a Dr. Maulana Ron Karenga) invented the seven-day
feast (Dec. 26-Jan. 1) in 1966, branding it a black alternative to
Christmas. The idea was to celebrate the end of what he considered the
Christmas-season exploitation of African Americans.

According to the official Kwanzaa Web site -- as opposed, say, to the
Hallmark Cards Kwanzaa site -- the celebration was designed to foster
"conditions that would enhance the revolutionary social change for the
masses of Black Americans" and provide a "reassessment, reclaiming,
recommitment, remembrance, retrieval, resumption, resurrection and
rejuvenation of those principles (Way of Life) utilized by Black
Americans' ancestors."

Karenga postulated seven principles: unity, self-determination,
collective work and responsibility, cooperative economics, purpose,
creativity and faith, each of which gets its day during Kwanzaa week.
He and his votaries also crafted a flag of black nationalism and a
pledge: "We pledge allegiance to the red, black, and green, our flag,
the symbol of our eternal struggle, and to the land we must obtain;
one nation of black people, with one God of us all, totally united in
the struggle, for black love, black freedom, and black self-
determination."

Now, the point: There is no part of Kwanzaa that is not fraudulent.

Begin with the name. The celebration comes from the Swahili term
"matunda yakwanza," or "first fruit," and the festival's trappings
have Swahili names -- such as "ujima" for "collective work and
responsibility" or "muhindi," which are ears of corn celebrants set
aside for each child in a family.

Worse, Kwanzaa ceremonies have no discernible African roots.

No culture on earth celebrates a harvesting ritual in December, for
instance, and the implicit pledges about human dignity don't
necessarily jibe with such still-common practices as female
circumcision and polygamy.

The inventors of Kwanzaa weren't promoting a return to roots; they
were shilling for Marxism. They even appropriated the term "ujima,"
which Julius Nyrere cited when he uprooted tens of thousands of
Tanzanians and shipped them forcibly to collective farms, where they
proved more adept at cultivating misery than banishing hunger.

Even the rituals using corn don't fit. Corn isn't indigenous to
Africa. Mexican Indians developed it, and the crop was carried
worldwide by white colonialists.

The fact is, there is no Ur-African culture. The continent remains
stubbornly tribal. Hutus and Tutsis still slaughter one another for
sport. Go to Kenya and you'll see endless hostility between Kikuyu,
Luo, Luhya and Masai. Even South African politics these days have more
to do with tribal animosities than ideological differences.

Moreover, chaos too often prevails over order. Warlords hold sway in
Somalia, Eritrea, Liberia and Zaire. Genocidal maniacs have wiped out
millions in Rwanda, Uganda and Ethiopia. The once-shining hopes for
Kenya have vanished.

Detroit native Keith Richburg writes in his extraordinary book, "Out
of America: A Black Man Confronts Africa," that "this strange place
defies even the staunchest of optimists; it drains you of hope ..."

Richburg, who served for three years as the African bureau chief for
The Washington Post, offers a challenge for the likes of Karenga:
"Talk to me about Africa and my black roots and my kinship with my
African brothers and I'll throw it back in your face, and then I'll
rub your nose in the images of rotting flesh."

His book concludes: "I have been here, and I have seen -- and frankly,
I want no part of it. .... By an accident of birth, I am a black man
born in America, and everything I am today -- my culture and my
attitudes, my sensibilities, loves and desires -- derives from that
one simple and irrefutable fact."

Nobody ever ennobled a people with a lie or restored stolen dignity
through fraud. Kwanzaa is the ultimate chump holiday. It praises
practices -- "cooperative economics, and collective work and
responsibility" -- that have succeeded nowhere on earth and would mire
American blacks in endless backwardness.

The white establishment has thrown in with it, not just to cash in on
the business, but to patronize black activists and shut them up.

This year, President Klinton signed his fourth Kwanzaa proclamation.
He crooned: "The symbols and ceremony of Kwanzaa, evoking the rich
history and heritage of African Americans, remind us that our nation
draws much of its strength from our diversity."


"Mighter than the tread of marching armies is the
power of an idea whose time has come."
-Victor Hugo

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

[from RESISTANCE #115, May 16th, 1997]

PURGING THE MILITARY

In a startling parallel to the 1930s Stalin régime,
ever since the Clintons took office they have occupied
themselves with quietly purging the U. S. military of
senior White male officers who are politically incorrect,
or perhaps politically suspect is a better term. In other
words, men of honor and integrity who might object to
some of the uses to which the Clintons would doubtless
like to put the American armed forces suddenly find
themselves enmeshed in bogus sex or financial scandals
and their careers terminated.

The purges have caught up even the chairman of
the Joint Chiefs, a number of senior divisional commanders
in all services, the Sergeant Major of the Army, and
potential sources of future White male officers such as
VMI and the Citadel, as well as the current purge the
apparent aim of which is to intimidate male non-coms
away from any attempt to exercise authority or discipline
over female military personnel.

The stick most commonly used to beat America’s
military by the Clintons has been "sexual harassment",
i.e. the inevitable results of creating a unisex military.
Beginning with the Tailhook affair that gutted the U. S.
Navy of some of its top combat pilots and senior commanders,
the disgraceful purges have proceeded almost like clockwork,
a new "scandal" every six months or so. An interesting
racial angle has also emerged and been jumped on by the
NAACP, in that some of the victimized senior non-coms
have been black males and their alleged sexual victims
White female soldiers.

There have been a sufficient number of leaked
allegations of forced perjury and fabricated testimony
by the female "victims" to make it appear clear that
the purge is being orchestrated from the top and specific
groups of male officers and non-coms targeted. In addition,
there have also been some more obscurely sinister aspects
such as the mysterious "suicide" of Admiral Jeremy Boorda
last year.

Why the need for a politically correct military? For
one thing, the Clinton/Reno régime needs soldiers who will
fire on American citizens without compunction, and if
necessary incinerate young children alive in their church,
as has already been done. It is conceivable that officers
who came up from the ranks back in the politically incorrect
days when serving the U. S. government was an honorable
vocation might still retain certain vestiges of scruple
about turning their guns on the people of the United States,
and might even fail to recognize their moral imperative
to maintain the liberal wing of the Democratic party in
perpetual power. Can’t have reactionary thinking like
that, now, can we?

But another probable reason becomes clear in a
piece of legislation introduced in the House of Representatives
in February, by none other that the queer Congressman
from Massachusetts, Barney Frank D.-Israel)-—a bill to repeal the
Twenty-Second Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. The
amendment which forbids any president from holding more t
han two consecutive terms of office.

Could it be that along about the year 2000, our
freshly purged, feminized, and faggotized military may be
called upon to declare the reign of King Billy The First
and his Most Noble Consort Queen Hillary? Inquiring minds
want to know! - HAC

[RESISTANCE is the weekly newsletter of the National Socialist
White People's Party. E-mail ns...@mindspring.com for subscription
details.]


"This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

NATIONAL SOCIALIST FORUM 12/31/97

Dear Gensec:

I'll be away from my computer for the next few days.
Taking a bit of a holiday for the New Years. Here's
wishing you a Happy and healthy New Year, and to the
Party a properous New Year, and not just financially.

88!
Red Doolin

**************************************

Dear HC,

The DNC has lost a huge amount of donations due to the AIDS
epidemic amongst their homosexual supporters. Queers carrying the HIV
virus must pay $15,000 per year for drugs just to suppress the
symptoms while these infected people still wind up dead within about
ten years time.

With the illegal Chinese funding shut down for now, Bill Clinton
wants to bring back the big donations from homosexuals, and what
better way than to saddle conservative America with their medical
bills all in the name of "compassion".

Spending on AIDS is already too high. George Bush, a typical
milksop Republican, increased funding for AIDS research to five
billion per year while drastically slashing spending on defense
projects, throwing over a million normal White people out of work.

AIDS is caused almost entirely by perverted VOLUNTARY behavior,
which a sane society would ban. As a comparison, consider all the
states, which have OUTLAWED riding a motorcycle without a helmet to
spare society the cost of hospitalization for what is considered a
reckless behavior. If the liberals can outlaw riding a motorcycle
without a helmet, which may result in head injuries for one out of a
thousand bikers, then society has an even greater imperative to outlaw
sodomy, which results in fatal disease for perhaps 90% of the male
homosexuals.

88!
Dilbert

***** Reuters Article Follows *******


Tuesday December 30 3:53 PM EST

Clinton to Seek More Money for AIDS Programs

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Clinton plans to seek an increase in
spending for a program to help people with the virus that causes AIDS
to buy expensive new treatment drugs, the White House said Tuesday.

Spokesman Joe Lockhart confirmed a New York Times story that said
Clinton would seek a 35 percent increase in spending for AIDS drug
assistance programs which help pay for new medications that help block
development of the disease.

Those drugs are usually given as a mixture in a so-called drug
cocktail and can cost $12,000 to $15,000 a year for one person. In
some cases private insurers do not pay for them, said a White House
official.

People infected with the virus are generally unable to to obtain
treatment drugs under the federal Medicaid program until they become
severely ill, the official said. The new drugs slow the progression of
the disease and prevent disability. In many cases, people are able to
continue to work and live productive lives, he said.

Clinton was expected to request $385 million for the drug programs in
the fiscal year 1999, up from $285 million this fiscal year and $167
million last year, White House officials said.

The increase in proposed spending for the AIDS drug assistance
programs is part of an overall $165 million increase the
administration will propose for the Ryan White Care Act to help treat
and care for people with AIDS, they said.

The proposed increase would represent a 14 percent rise in spending
for the program that helps provide medical care for people suffering
from the disease. That would raise total spending to slightly more
than $1.3 billion, officials said.

An official who asked not to be identified said that Vice President Al
Gore had pushed for the proposed increase, which he said was being
made within the context of a balanced budget agreement that allows
only a 1 percent rise in discretionary spending for fiscal 1999.

He said the administration has been searching for ways
to help people with the AIDS virus cope with the high
cost of treatment, but that so far it has been a
"search without an answer."

***********************************

Return-Path: <f...@vcn.bc.ca>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 18:00:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Franklin Wayne Poley <f...@vcn.bc.ca>
Subject: Re: Fake Concentration Camp
To: NSWPP-CSU <ns...@mindspring.com>
cc: Round...@flinet.com

Happy New Year Nazis. Not that any of you are ought but CIA plants,
ADL plants and Mossad plants. Still and all, hang in there! Some day
you could glean a few shekels out of this.
FWP.

**********************************

Dear Gensec,

Happy New Year! It looks like we've got more good quality,
intelligent people than ever before, judging from the NS Forums.
Affirmative Action has been flushed in California, and is on the
chopping block for the next election in Washington.

Remember the Civil Rights con men got their start calling for
equality and then worked their way up to quotas and second class
citizenship for Whites. Hopefully, we can get started with equality
and work our way up to deporting the colored monkeys.

88!
J. K.

*************************************

Subject: New Years Greeting

Dear Gen Sec,

Nothing mundane this time as was my last post...just my best wishes
for a very prosperous and happy new year.

Hopefully this will be the year that people will awaken from their
slumber and begin to use their minds. To realize the bill of goods
that you have been sold all your life is nothing but propoganda from
the "establishment" is truly enlightening.

Let us all hope that the masses begin to use their power of rational
thought to realize what the true world has become and if nothing else
to begin to question and become at least a little cynical. At the end
of questioning and cynicism is the light of enrichment necessary for
change.

I remain:

Respectfully Yours Always,
Hank

********************************

Subject: Myatt on The Holocaust

Not wanting to sound naive - but why lie? What's to gain?

-Bill Barton

[For starters, a whole new artificial state called Israel.
Then a multi-billion dollar revenue flow from "reparations", movies
like Swindler's List and Winds of War, shaking down Swiss banks for
non-existent Nazi gold, and other Holohoax-related scams.
Finally, the moral authority for the Jewish people to do
whatever the hell they want in the world without being
questioned or criticized. I'd say those things are worth a lie
or two. - HAC]


*********************************


Subject: Van Gogh

The Van Gogh Family Tree

Here are several of Vincent van Gogh's lesser-known relatives...

The grandfather who moved to Yugoslavia ---> U. Gogh
The brother who accidentally bleached all his clothes white---> Hue
Gogh
The real obnoxious brother---> Please Gogh
The brother who ate prunes---> Gotta Gogh
The uncle who worked at a convenience store---> Stop N. Gogh
His dizzy aunt ---> Verti Gogh
The cousin who moved to Illinois ---> Chica Gogh
His magician uncle ---> Wherediddy Gogh
The cousin who lived in Mexico ---> Amee Gogh and who also had a
relative
North of the Border ---> Grin Gogh
The nephew that drove a stage coach ---> Wells Far Gogh
The uncle who was constipated ---> Cant Gogh
The aunt who loved ballroom dancing ---> Tan Gogh
His ornithologist uncle ---> Flamin Gogh
His nephew, the Freudian psychoanalyist ---> E. Gogh
His cousin who loved tropical fruits ---> Mang Gogh
And he had an aunt who taught the power of positive thinking-->Way
Too Gogh
His bouncy young nephew ---> Poe Gogh
His Disco-loving sister ---> Go Gogh
And his niece, who's been traveling the U.S. in a van --->Winnie Bay
Gogh.

-Brian Kennedy

[Lay off that New Year's Guinness and Bushmills, Brian. You
can't handle it. - HAC]

**************************************

There is only one resolution I shall vow to keep this year: I shall
attack leftists with every fiber of my being and teach others how to
do the same. In so doing, there will be no time for Heeb TV,
especially the Communist News Network, and spectator sports. For this
is war, they are the enemy, and I have no intention on going down
without a fight.

Hence, try to imagine how ridiculous the natives look while dancing,
but without the dreadful thump, thump, thump that accompanies what the
rabble and the mud people call music. It gets even more amusing when
you try to visualize what these cultural misfits would look like
without their hideous costumes on.

Now hold that thought; for that is what I see when I think about the
hordes of moths worshipping their basketball and football idols
bouncing around the boob-tube. There is simply no substance and
therefore, no reason for anyone to get emotionally aroused or excited.
But they do. How come? Because they are without substance themselves,
and their shallowness of character is in direct proportion to their
dismal social intellect.

After all, why should I be happy for the filthy rich prostitutes who
depend on followers to support their voracious appetites? Does it
really bring someone real joy, peace of mind, and better way of life
because some overpaid entertainer is able to put a ball through a
hoop? Only when they are hopelessly addicted to utter nonsense and
satisfied with being dragged around by their nose; only when they
selfishly care more about the cheap thrill of the moment than they do
the future of this country and western culture; and only when they
prefer absolute control and despotism to freedom and liberty.

In truth, this country no longer has a sense of itself, other than
what the media propagandists, liberal jackals, and career autocrats in
government say it is. The sheeple pay twice for their slop and thrice
for their benevolent shepherds to dispense it. Umm, tasty socialist
gruel for a king's ransom while paying more every year.

The lesson here, frankly, is to stop helping them to have their way
with you. Without you, the whole establishment will quickly crumble
and the swine will flee. For it does not take a majority to control a
majority; nor does it take a majority to win a war. But it does take a
spark to ignite a fire under a sleeping giant's ass. Anyone got a
match? Good. Then use it!

-The Desert Viperfox

*****************************************



"Mighter than the tread of marching armies is the
power of an idea whose time has come."
-Victor Hugo

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

NATIONAL SOCIALIST FORUM 1/1/98


Subject: Hope at last

Dear Honorable Harold Covington and NSWPP,

A friend forwarded some email sent by you. During
my reading it I thought of the time in Marine Corps
boot camp. Our platoon had just performed poorly
while practicing for final drill comp. All four
DI's (Drill Instructors) came down hard, saying
things about our families and honor etc. then to
my amazement everyone I looked at was crying,
from the badest to the weakest. I knew I had done
my best and did not cry. After reading your beliefs
and truths those old boot camp feelings of survival
and accomplishment have been brought to the surface
and I thank you for that. We won final drill comp
and were awarded the coveted gold boot for platoon
1009 and I graduated meritoriously. I now have
confidence that we will be victorious in the Aryan
battle that now wages onward.

Bruce & Debbie
Charlotte & Regina (children)

****************************************
Subject: Balloon

Dear Gensec,

Check out the address below. It shows a map of how far Steve
Fossett has gone in his balloon. There are several heroic White men
trying to circle the planet in a balloon. Somehow, I haven't seen too
many Jews climbing Mount Everest or setting any dangerous new records.

88!
J. K.


http://wubot.wustl.edu:90/

*****************************************
Subject: Play Toad


I'm not a greenie or anything but I do believe in preserving the
environment and in LIMITED development. The greenies have to file that

lawsuit to try to get set aside 500,000 acres. The reason being that
one has to claim a lot more in order to get even a fraction of what
you asked for.

Look at all the species dying out due to human over-population and
unchecked development. Is that the way to take care of something (i.e.
the earth)? Tigers in India are being threatened. I mean the ultimate
predator has to hunt subhumans because his food supply is running out.


That's not such a bad thing but then yabba dabba wants his hide for
killing one of his 15 slave workers.

I'm a friend of the greenies because I think what they are doing is
RIGHT and because they are flamers, liberals, and other garbage I
could careless because it doesn't make one iota of difference in the
big picture. My enemy (liberals, greenies) of my enemy (Jew
arch-capitalists et al that are promoting the NWO and unsustainable
living) is my friend.

MH

********************************


Subject: Spotted Nocturnal Rat

Dear Mr. Covington,

I remember back when I was a boy there was a group of people called
the "Zero Growth" or "No Growth" movement, which was determined to
prevent further construction of new homes anywhere. Now these mental
giants never explained what you would do with the surplus population
without homes. Modern liberalism, however, has introduced Jack
Kervorkian, who has volunteered to kill off old folks faster and to
spare the Clinton Budget from having to support so many old White
people, but the massive third world immigration into the U.S. still
drives millions of Whites into the suburbs to escape minority crime
and ruined public schools. This means the suburbs need more houses and
suddenly new liberal lunatics burst upon the scene to try to block
this expansion.

To be fair, some environmentalists are sincere individuals, and
the idea of preserving huge national parks for the sake of the public
was originally done by the far right patriot, Teddy Roosevelt. I have
found it a useful tactic to point out to environmentalists that
Mexicans will make a business of spray painting cars in their back
yards and will drain radiator fluid into the storm drains no matter
what OSHA outlaws. In San Francisco, immigrant Cambodians ate every
single animal in a nearby park; what do you think they would if they
got a hold of some kangaroo rats and a wok?? Also, third worlders are
notorious for slashing and burning rain forests as their
populations continue to explode in Indonesia, Brazil, and everywhere
else. The only places on earth where the environment is given any
serious consideration today are White nations.

Getting back to the "No Growth" movement of the '70s, the
collective hippies and such, who were pushing this philosophy quickly
discovered that they weren't getting anywhere. After years of
brainstorming (or acid trips as the case may be) one of them hit on
the idea that they could ban construction by claiming that some
obscure rodent, bug, or duck was in immediate danger of extinction.
Many more White people are sensitive to this type of argument, and
they will often assume that some beautiful sandhill crane, or condor,
or wolf is being saved, while in reality constrution is usually being
stopped nowadays because of a rat or a slug. In reality, the "No
Growth" fanatics and lunatics from the '70s have veiled their lunacy
with a claim that valuable species are being wiped out.

Some animals are extremely secretive, and it may seem like there
is only one per square mile while there are in fact twenty.
Environmentalists can claim that the "spotted nocturnal rat" is
endangered because they have only found four. Well, is it worth
spending millions to find ten? Is it worth cancelling millions in new
home construction because you found a spotted nocturnal rat within
five miles of a planned development?

America has a higher percentage of land devoted to national
parks than any other country. The national park system itself is an
excellent system for preserving North America's wildlife. Bill Clinton
has abused the concept of the park system by declaring the largest
clean-burning, soft coal deposit in the world as a national park in
Utah. Why did Clinton do this? Because Indonesian businessmen, who
funneled him illegal donations, own the second largest deposit of soft
coal in Indonesia. Clearly, environmentalism is being used not only as
a club by "No Growth" fanatics, but as a political payback for
economic treason.

America, as an almost all-White nation, under Teddy Roosevelt,
behaved responsibly toward the environment while our modern America is
shipping factories across the border to escape OSHA regulations,
Mexicans are pouring motor oil and radiator fluid down every storm
drain in every major American city, and minority gangs populations are
forcing Whites to build new homes futher and further away from the
cities just to live in crime free environments. Multi-racialism is
destroying America and the environment.

88!
Otto Nowotny

**************************************************

Happy New Year to all my comrades from Texas. We are
making the progress that makes the difference for our
way of life. I know everybody is impressed with Hq. so
let's pull together and make it happen! Has anyone except
me been getting their mail returned from Michelle? I got
all my letters and Christmas correspondence returned for
my return address, which hasn't changed one iota over
the years. I know its a case of harrassment but would
like to know if anyone has experienced the same
problem.

-Charles Mueller

[Michelle seems to have been either moved or
in some way placed incommunicado. She warned me in a
letter several weeks ago that the scuttlebutt was she
was in for some more "diesel therapy". I am trying to
ascertain her whereabouts but getting any information from
these people is like pulling teeth. - HAC]

************************************

Subject: One Less Dumb Rock


Dear HC,

I see two possibilities here:

1).The Kennedy boys are as dumb as rocks (as I commented in my last
letter) and can't ski around a tree or

2).The "American Royal Family" may have bumped off one of its more
embarassing members just as the British Royal Family apparently did
earlier this year.

88!
Dilbert

Wednesday December 31 10:19 PM EST

Report: Michael Kennedy Killed in Ski Accident

DENVER (Reuters) - Michael Kennedy, the son of the late Sen. Robert
Kennedy, died on Wednesday in a skiing accident, the Summit County
sheriff's office said.

Kennedy, 39, hit a tree while skiing on Aspen Mountain in Aspen,
Colorado.

Kennedy was transported to a local hospital where he was pronounced
dead, the office said.

He was in Aspen for a holiday family outing. The popular and
fashionable skiing resort of Aspen is a magnet for the rich and famous
at Christmas time.

Kennedy became embroiled in controversy earlier this year over an
alleged affair with his children's teenage babysitter, but a police
investigation of the relationship was dropped when the teenager
refused to press charges.


********************************


Greetings Comrade Covington;

As you would no doubt know there has been a rift in the Australian
Nationalists Movement and a new movement the Australian Revolutionary
Movement has been born, in excess of 95% of the ANM membership moved
to ARM and I was moved from Secretary General to Leader (much against
my desires) but at the end of the day the bottom line is that the 95%
of the membership had no desire to play soft-ball and to develop a
clean and respectable image, we are revolutionaries, we are right and
the ZOG is wrong as simple at that.

Now I don't profess to have great skills with a computer and yet I am
one of the more enlightened members when it comes to the beige box,
but we have a home page and it will grow. Bear in mind that this page
is only a week old with no more than half a dozen hours worth of work
spent on it, so don't expect a first class site. But what it does
offer is access to the book Australia Nation Without A State, well
worth reading.

Any way, why not pay us a visit on :-
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/7923/

The page has been registered with the search engines and it should be
available via search between one week and six weeks time. By the time
it is open to the world I really hope to have it cleaned up.

I would really appreciate your feed back and the feed back of our
comrades, some of the blokes are far superior to me when it comes to
their computing skills. But please if your have a criticism - have a
solution as well.

Thank you

Chris

Chris J. Bartle
Australian Revolutionary Movement
PO Box 2047
Rockingham
WA 6168
AUSTRALIA

PHONE 018 922 447

[Sigh...."Plus ça change, plus ça même chose"... - HAC]

*********************************

Actually, I don't smoke, drink or swear. Traits that I share with John
C. Calhoun, Adolf Hitler, Martin McGuinness and Seán MacStiofáin.
(Pretty good company, don't you think?) I'll have one or two drinks of
Bushmills every Christmas Eve, and that's it. (They'll probably bury
half of the bottle with me.)

It might interest you to know that I did get the family tree, above,
from a friend I made on the Unionist list, though. I am getting around
more than I used to ...

-- best regards,
Brian

[That's another thing we're going to have to break you
of, Brian...this rather bizarre idea that the Marxist baby-killing
cowards of the Provisional I.R.A. are some kind of heroes. Let me
spell this out, folks---there is NO relationship, NONE AT ALL,
spiritually or politically or in any other way, between the people
presently calling themselves "I.R.A." and the guys you see in "Michael
Collins". I recall that one of the last acts of the late General
Tom Barry, who died while I was living in Ireland, was to physically
drive Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness out of his house, beating
them about the head and shoulders with his cane and cursing them
as the slayers of infants and a disgrace to the cause Barry once
served so gallantly. His last public utterance before his death
was a press release reiterating this viewpoint in words of one
syllable. I seem to recall that "bastards" was about the kindest
word this REAL freedom fighter had for the Provos.

Interestingly enough, Adams was also subjected to similar
rough handling by the aged brother of Liam Mellowes, who was one of
the pro-Marxist Connolly-type I.R.A. men back in the 1920s. His
exact words to Adams, as I recall, on a public podium, were "You
lot up in Belfast wouldn't make a pimple on Liam Mellowes' arse.
We fought against men in those days, and we fought LIKE men. We didn't

make war on children or shoot unarmed men in the back."

I also recall one of the finest gestures I ever heard of
when a Provo bomb went off at Harrod's department store in London
at the height of the Christmas rush, killing six people. A memorial
service was held several days later in St. Paul's for the victims,
and there in the front row were a dozen elderly men, several of
them in wheelchairs, all wearing their black berets from the Old
I.R.A. Association and their chests bearing medals they won during
the Irish War of Independence from 1919-1922. They were there to
make the point that these murdering psychopaths did not, and do
not speak for Ireland.

Having lived for five years in the Republic I can tell
you that the overwhelming majority of the people there hold the Provos
in utter revulsion, a revulsion which is unfortunately uttered all
too infrequently in public because of Provo intimidation---a damned
good argument against gun control, because a large part of the problem
is that the Provos and I.N.L.A. are the only dogs in the junkyard
with teeth. But the story is told in the vote totals that Sinn
Fein gets---except in a couple of rigged constituencies up on the
Border, where the Provos have driven out or terrorized into silence
any opposition, their vote totals are miniscule. Okay, the Irish
may sing "the Boys of the Old Brigade" in the pub at closing time,
but they do NOT want these pond scum ruling their country and if
there were ever any serious Sinn Fein attempt to take over the
country I am convinced there would be another Civil War as the
Irish people resisted Adams and his gang by force of arms.

The situation in the North is a lot more complicated,
true, resembling a blood feud now more than anything else---virtually
every family in either tribe in the North has buried one or more
loved ones by now and that clouds judgment beyond recovery.

I happen to believe that there are certain historical
situations which are insoluble, and Northern Ireland is one.
I don't deny that the Protestants are in many cases just as wigged-out
as the Provos. But that does not mean we have to swallow this Provo
propaganda crap about how they are still fighting the same fight
that was on in the 1920s. The situation is completely different. The
Provos seek one thing---sheer, brute POWER over the entire island
of Ireland. They are part of the powers of darkness in this time of
the triumph of evil. - HAC]



"Mighter than the tread of marching armies is the
power of an idea whose time has come."
-Victor Hugo

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

January 1, 1998

TALK IS CHEAP
by Viperfox

Throughout the night, and again this morning, I listened intently to
the chatter of the media mongrels reminiscing about 1997 on the radio.
But I was not paying attention to what they were saying for the sake
of learning something historically significant; for what they consider
important is basically irrelevant, sheepish, and the proof positive of
a puppet generation whose cultural perception is limited to the length
of their strings.

Instead, I was studying how they organized their words to substantiate
their light-headed convictions with regards to multiculturalism as a
way to keep the gullible conditioned. But more importantly, the
pattern of their thoughts which were reflected in their mindless
sentiments revealed the subtle way the establishment woos its intended
prey much like a molester sweet-talks a child.

Bear in mind, that on any given night 60 to 80 percent of the
absorbing public are glued to their television sets; and when their
not doing that, they are hard at work spreading the misinformation
they've been taught. Over time, so many are convinced that wrong is
right that it is nearly impossible to even discuss their affliction in
rational terms.

As a result, a "good" person is one who parrots the liberal mantra; a
"wonderful" person is one who teaches others to behave like they do;
and a social "icon" is one who manages to influence millions,
including so-called dignitaries, bureaucrats, and authoritarians. A
case in point: Princess Diana.

The vacillating multitudes were used in an experiment to prove just
how easy it was for anti-western sleight-of-hand to overpower
hypocritical ideals and convoluted thinking. We were told to look past
the soiled lips of a "knighted" queer to embrace the "loving"
utterances of a slut's "friend."

Likewise, when the ring-leaders and social provocateurs in the press
wanted everyone to shed tears on cue, they deliberately kept referring
to Nicole Brown-Simpson's fling-thing as her "friend." Again, when the
defrocked whore and race-mixer (with an artificial title) died, it
was her "friend," and not her sex partner who perished.

The message here, of course, is that immoral relations are of no
consequence; and rather than have people look at these deviants for
what they really are, they candy-coat what ought to be a public
disgrace with passionate hype until the distraction actually becomes
the object. In other words, if they can get people to stay in an
emotional trance, they will actually approve of and be less likely to
resist being violated.

The second message that came across loud and clear was that character
does not matter; for again, another "top" story that we just had to
know about was how yet another Kennedy pervert and womanizer was
killed unexpectedly. For the next few days we'll be treated to a
Donnie Osmond rendition of a smiling "humanitarian," while ignoring
the man's blatant character flaws.

Correspondingly, it makes my skin crawl when I hear some feminist,
homo, or heathen carry on about how Bill Clinton is the "greatest
president this century." For it doesn't concern the spoon-fed masses
that their so-called Commander in Chief is a liar, a swindler, and a
possible murderer; what counts is that he has "noble" intentions
according to the moral relativist viewpoint.

The death of John Denver made big news because he was an environmental
missionary, as was Jacques Costeau; Betty Shabazz was given
extraordinary mention because she was the widow of the beloved Malcom
X, despite the man's criminal accomplishments and ominous motives; the
fashion designer Gianni Versace's murder took center stage without a
word being said about his abominable lifestyle as deserving of much
worse than he actually got; the Gangstra rapper who was shot,
Christopher Wallace, was highlighted because he contributed to the
cultural degeneration of our nation's youth; the first black mayor of
Detroit, Coleman Young, was praised simply because
he was a left-wing activist and a sainted Negro; and Deng Xiaoping,
who was perhaps a role model that every liberal wishes they could be,
was given a hero's farewell.

Those who were morally upright, by comparison, such as Mother Teresa,
Red Skelton, and Jimmy Stewart, received far less credit than they
deserved. Do you suppose that happened by accident? Or might it be
because these individuals represent the antithesis of what liberals
espouse?

It is plain as day for all who have eyes and care to open them: the
cultural aborigines and resident traitors will stop at nothing to
advance their agenda. For the entire West is being saturated with
noxious propaganda, double-talk, and newspeak from top to the bottom.

Patrick Buchanan tried to say our nation was in the middle of a
"cultural war" a few years ago. Few listened; and shortly after that,
he was effectively silenced by his own political "brethren." But do
you need a famous face, such as a TV commentator, to explain the
obvious before you'll draw the same conclusions? Only if you would
also wait for others to do for you what you ought to be doing
yourselves.

Thus, what is, matters less than what needs to be done. You know in
your heart that this country is in trouble. And if you don't act to
save it, you will end up going down with it.

To me, 1997 was a non-year as will be 1998. Nor do I need to be
reminded of those things I hate, for I know who I am and where I am
going. The question is: do you?

While we wait for the inevitable to come, immerse yourself in
knowledge, be prepared, and get to know who your friends are. There is
a Stormfront approaching and only the strongest will survive. But
history will prove us right, for good things truly come to those who
wait.

Yes, talk is cheap. But saying nothing can be worth even less. <>


"Mighter than the tread of marching armies is the
power of an idea whose time has come."
-Victor Hugo

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

[from the NSWPP Hotline series]

Hello, this is Harold Covington, General Secretary
of the National Socialist White People's Party, and the
date is February 12th, 1995.

I almost forgot that February is supposed to be
Black History Month, but that's understandable. There's
a lot that's forgettable about Black History. You get
two types of black history, the real thing and the
politically correct rubbish that is taught in
schools today to young people who have so little
idea of the genuine history of their country and
their race that they don't know any better than
to believe that horse hockey. That's nasty---
lies are being taught to our children and paid
for with our tax dollars.

I'll give you an example. How often have
you heard this idiotic idea repeated that the
famous Queen of Egypt, Cleopatra, was black?
That is rubbish. Utter, complete, falsehood. Not
only was the real Queen Cleopatra not black, she
wasn't even Egyptian. She was a Greek. Cleopatra
was a descendant of what is known as the Ptolemaic
dynasty, which was founded by one of Alexander the
Great's generals when Alexander conquered Egypt
several centuries before and left the first Ptolemy
behind as military governor. Reliable first-hand
eyewitness descriptions of Cleopatra by Greek and
Roman historians still exist today; she had blond
hair and blue eyes.

The real black history is worlds apart from
what is taught in our schools. In actual historical
fact, the black man has contributed nothing of any
lasting value to this country besides peanut butter
and sheer physical labor, and even as far as labor goes,
the blacks did nothing that a good strong cart horse
couldn't have done better, faster, and cheaper. The
black man's contribution to American history is on a
par with that of the horse or the mule, but you don't
see horses or mules getting voting rights, welfare,
affirmative action, or their own history month where
children are taught lies about these animals at
taxpayers expense. Not yet, anyway, unless the Animal
Rights nuts get their way.




"Mighter than the tread of marching armies is the
power of an idea whose time has come."
-Victor Hugo

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

NSWPP wrote in message <34ad02d4....@news.mindspring.com>...


>[from RESISTANCE #115, May 16th, 1997]
>
> PURGING THE MILITARY
>
> In a startling parallel to the 1930s Stalin régime,
>ever since the Clintons took office they have occupied
>themselves with quietly purging the U. S. military of
>senior White male officers who are politically incorrect,
>or perhaps politically suspect is a better term.

Nonsense about purges aside, I can't recall of a single US military officer
that has been taken out and shot, or sent to the Gulag.

But if the idiots at the "National Alliance" find it startling that
high-ranking military officers do not serve forever, they startle kind of
easy.

But we knew that . . .

Jerry L. White

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

If the military was honoring it's oath to the Constitution: They would
know that it is Congress that regulates the military, not the Executive
branch of govt't.

In a previous article, ns...@mindspring.com (NSWPP) says:

>[from RESISTANCE #115, May 16th, 1997]
>
> PURGING THE MILITARY
>
> In a startling parallel to the 1930s Stalin régime,
>ever since the Clintons took office they have occupied
>themselves with quietly purging the U. S. military of
>senior White male officers who are politically incorrect,

Jerry L. White

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

DIVIDE AND CONQUER: I would speculate that the Establishment was
behind this fraud.

In a previous article, ns...@mindspring.com (NSWPP) says:

Richard G. Philllips

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

Joel Rosenberg wrote:
>
> NSWPP wrote in message <34ad02d4....@news.mindspring.com>...
> >[from RESISTANCE #115, May 16th, 1997]
> >
> > PURGING THE MILITARY
> >
> > In a startling parallel to the 1930s Stalin régime,
> >ever since the Clintons took office they have occupied
> >themselves with quietly purging the U. S. military of
> >senior White male officers who are politically incorrect,
> >or perhaps politically suspect is a better term.
>
> Nonsense about purges aside, I can't recall of a single US military officer
> that has been taken out and shot, or sent to the Gulag.

=====================================================
Philllips
It isn't necessary because the U.S. Army operates on an "up-or-out"
system. there is a rigid table of just how many officers in what age
groups can hold what ranks. The result is that if an officer is passed
over a sufficient number of times, he is required to resign his
commission.

And be in not the slightest doubt that, if the executive does not want
an officer to be promoted, it has ways of enforcing its wishes.

=====================================================

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

Richard G. Philllips wrote in message <34AD3A...@earthlink.net>...


>Joel Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>> NSWPP wrote in message <34ad02d4....@news.mindspring.com>...
>> >[from RESISTANCE #115, May 16th, 1997]
>> >
>> > PURGING THE MILITARY
>> >
>> > In a startling parallel to the 1930s Stalin régime,
>> >ever since the Clintons took office they have occupied
>> >themselves with quietly purging the U. S. military of
>> >senior White male officers who are politically incorrect,
>> >or perhaps politically suspect is a better term.
>>
>> Nonsense about purges aside, I can't recall of a single US military
officer
>> that has been taken out and shot, or sent to the Gulag.
>
>=====================================================
>Philllips
>It isn't necessary because the U.S. Army operates on an "up-or-out"
>system.

Interesting assertion -- then the only reason that Stalin sent people to the
Gulag is because he didn't have an "up-or-out" system?

Pfui.

But, sure, the Commander-In-Chief of all US Armed Forces may well have some
influence on who is promoted in some of the services which he commands.

For somebody who looks forward with unconcealed glee to a total societal
breakdown, Phillips, you shock easy.

lazm

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

ROFLMAO

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

NSWPP wrote in message <34ad0206....@news.mindspring.com>...

>
>
> "This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
>mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
>Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM
>

This is, perhaps, the same Francis Parker Yockey who received a medical
discharge from the US Army in 1942(!)because of schizophrenia, or, as it was
called then, "dementia praecox"? (His particular disease seems to have had
both hebephrenic and paranoid components, although the paranoid components
clearly dominate.) The same one who heard nonexistent voices? The same one
who committed suicide while in jail for passport fraud? That one?

From the Britannica:

"Hallucinations and delusions, although not invariably present, are often a
conspicuous
symptom in schizophrenia. The most common hallucinations are auditory: the
patient hears
(nonexistent) voices and believes in their reality. Schizophrenics are
subject to a wide variety of
delusions, including many that are characteristically bizarre or absurd. One
symptom common to
most schizophrenics is a loosening in their thought processes; this syndrome
manifests itself as
disorganized or incoherent thinking, illogical trains of mental association,
and unclear or
incomprehensible speech."

Doug Berry

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

On Fri, 02 Jan 1998 14:05:32 -0500, "Richard G. Philllips"
<rgp...@earthlink.net> wrote:


>And be in not the slightest doubt that, if the executive does not want
>an officer to be promoted, it has ways of enforcing its wishes.

For General Officer appointments, (Admirals for the Navy), the
President has to forward the flag-select officers' names to congress,
who decide who gets their stars. This insures that the true leaders
of our military are not just chosen by the military clique, but by our
civilian leaders.
--
+--------------------------------------------+
| Douglas E. Berry dbe...@nospam.hooked.net |
| http://www.hooked.net/~dberry/index.html |
| (remove "nospam" to reply by mail) |
|--------------------------------------------|
| "History is the vast and tangled web |
| of Conspiracy." -Anon. |
+--------------------------------------------+

Andy Walton

unread,
Jan 2, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/2/98
to

In article <68jcq6$j4t$1...@alexander.INS.CWRU.Edu>,
ja...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Jerry L. White) wrote:

:If the military was honoring it's oath to the Constitution: They would


:know that it is Congress that regulates the military, not the Executive
:branch of govt't.

Both do. The President is designated Commander-in-Chief in the first line
of article II of the Constitution. In both cases, the message is clear --
the military answers to civilian authorities.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"You come to see what you want to see
You come to see, but you never come to know." --Kinky Friedman -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Walton * att...@mindspring.com * http://atticus.home.mindspring.com/

Sandra Huber

unread,
Jan 3, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/3/98
to

>KWANZAA'S FRAUDULENT ROOTS
>
>An Opinion by Tony Snow
>
>WASHINGTON -- Blacks in America have suffered an endless series of
>insults and degradations, the latest of which goes by the name of
>Kwanzaa.
>
>Ron Karenga (a/k/a Dr. Maulana Ron Karenga) invented the seven-day
>feast (Dec. 26-Jan. 1) in 1966, branding it a black alternative to
>Christmas. The idea was to celebrate the end of what he considered the
>Christmas-season exploitation of African Americans.

Sad, but no more sadder than the phony Chanukka, invented in 1866 as a
rival to the celebration of the birth of Christ, by a rebbi who was
infuriated with hate at seeing j*ws exchange gifts with Christians at
ChristMass time.

Kwanzaa has its rituals in Swahili, an East African peoples, whereas most
American Blacks came from Western Africa. Also, one ritual is comprised
of giving each child an ear of corn. For the love of Mike, corn is not,
was not, indigenous to Africa.

Oh well..................

Only modern "suburban" Blacks are suseptable to this liberal tripe.

May the good Black peoples of America find their true roots somehow.


Kenneth McVay OBC

unread,
Jan 3, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/3/98
to

In article <68lotf$gu0$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>,
Sandra H*ber <EEG...@prodigy.com> wrote: [nothing]

Archive/File: pub/people/h/huber.a/huber-10q
First-published: 1996/03/21
Last-Modified: 1996/06/26

Mr. Huber,

During the course of your journey through the
sewers of digital messaging, you have provided a number of
frauds, insults, deceits and outright lies, all aimed at
defaming Jewish people.

Now that I have clearly and unequivocably called you a blatant
liar, you can prove me wrong by answering the following
questions. In the event you suffer from memory failures, I
will be considerate enough to continue to republish these
questions from time to time so that you will not be denied the
fair and public opportunity to respond, and clear your, er,
good name.

Perhaps Prodigy users will be kind enough to post this series
of questions to your favourite Prodigy discussion groups, so
that you will be certain to see them, and internet users will
forward them to aard...@styx.ios.com as well.

Question 1
---------------------

On January 29, 1996, you made the following statement:

"We have long known that the WIESENTHAL center for pagan
studies has doctored so-called holocaust pictures. Go to
the so-called holocaust museum in DC & they'll show you
thousands of smelly shoes of so-called victims. Makes you
wonder, though, how so-called victims had shoes & sneakers
made in China in 1955......." (Huber, Air Photos)

Although you have been asked to provide proof that the
Simon Wiesenthal Center has doctored Holocaust pictures,
you have failed to do so. Not surprisingly, although you
were also asked to provide proof that the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum included shoes made in
China in 1955 as evidence of the Holocaust, you have shown
yourself either unwilling or unable to do so.

(I toured the USHMM on March 26, 1996, and inspected the
display of shoes from Maidanek. Alas, I was unable to
determine where these "Chinese shoes and sneakers" are.
The Museum, however, provides a photograph of these
shoes, so perhaps you will examine it and circle those
shoes which came from China, so I can locate them.)

Please demonstrate that you are not a fraud and a liar,
and prove that your assertions are true, or admit, here
and now, that you are a liar, and retract them.

Question 2
----------

On February 1, 1996, you refered to the Holocaust as
"alleged:"

"No sooner does someone deny the alleged holocaust,
than you label them as dispassionate & disinterested."
(Huber, Gas Chambers, Feb. 1)

In response to the following query:

"Can those of you who deny the Holocaust explain
where the Jews of Eastern Europe went?"

You replied:

"They have been known to wander, hence the term 'Wandering
j*w'. Also the term from inbreeding , known as wandering eye."
(Huber, 27th Question)

One day later, you commented about "another holocaust,"
which suggests that you do, in fact, believe the historical
record, (Huber, Air Photos, Feb. 5) and you also speak
of the Holocaust as historical reality in your exchanges
on Prodigy (See huber.0295).

You seem confused about the Holocaust, denying it on
one day, and affirming it on the next. Please explain
this seeming contradiction.

Question 3
----------

In your UseNet articles, you never spell the word "Jew."
Instead, you insert an asterisk where the 'e' belongs.

In March 1996, you stated, "NEVER capitalize, never
spell j*w." In a February 1995 Prodigy article, however,
we find you writing the following:

"Fazel, I am still awaiting your offer to post the article
about the Jews killing 30,000 Germans in cold blood after
the Russian breach of the border." (huber.0295)

As both spelling the full word and capitalizing the word
is obviously your practice on Prodigy, but not on UseNet,
it would be instructive if you would explain why you have
deliberately misrepresented your practice.

Question 4
----------

On March 7, 1996, you published an article attributed to
James Brolin, of the "Cicero Gazette." You included the
following claim:

"Two dozen spies were named, from the sect'y to walter
LIPPMAN to alger HISS, klaus FUCHS, "MLAD", War Dept.
official william ULLMAN, intelligence official joseph JULIUS,
Treas Dept.'s harold GLASSER, the Air Forces's george
SILVERMAN, and nathan SILVERMASTER of the Bd. of Economic
Warfare.

ALL BUT TWO ARE jewish. Even as Hitler ravaged Europe, even
as millions of Britains, Americans, Poles & French were dying
to subdue the holocaust, jews spying on America and were giving
up American secrets for Russian & German shekels, dooming their
brothers in the gas-chambers of Auschwitz to death."
(Huber, "a jewish" "NIZKOR should" and others)

To which, William Anderson replied:

"Mr. Huber, above, lists nine people accussed of spying
for the Soviet Union, and claims that all but two of them
are Jewish. The nine are:

1) The secretary to Walter Lippmann. Mr. Huber does not
name the secretary, because "Lippmann" sounds Jewish, but
the secretaries name, May Price, does not.

2) Alger Hiss. Scion of one of Baltimore's oldest protestant
families. Not a Jew by any stretch of the imagination.

3) Klaus Fuchs. Son of German Quakers. Not a Jew.

4) Mlad. Mlad is a code name for a physicist who worked on
the Manhattan project and may have passed information to the
Soviets. Huber does not tell you this physicist's name,
because "Mlad" sounds vaguely foreign and potentially Jewish,
and "Theodore Hall" does not. (Anderson, real
revisionism)

Anderson goes on to point out that you, Mr. Huber, lied
when you made the claim "All but two are Jewish," and
establishes this fact beyond all dispute. The question,
therefore, is why?

Why did you tell this lie, Mr. Huber?

Question Five
-------------

On and about May 20, 1996, you published an article under
your "M. Huber" account which purported to be a citation
from a web page. Your text read, in part, as follows:

"...journal that the Nazis were an aberration, that they
were the exact opposite of all that his Germany represented,
something from an eyewitness which contradicts the new book
by Goldhagen who blames all Germans, even little babies."
(Huber, Survivor's Story)

A check of your own reference, however,
http://langlab.uta.edu/GERM/GIC/Week_In_Germany/10Maywig.txt,
contained only the following text:

"...journal that the Nazis were an aberration, that they
were the exact opposite of all that his Germany represented."

Clearly, Mr. Huber, you altered the original text,
and forged the final paragraph. It is equally clear that you
have not read Mr. Goldhagen's book - had you done so, you
would not have lied about his thesis.

Question Five is presented in two parts:

5-1: Why did you lie about your alteration of the text, Mr. Huber?

5-2: Which page of Mr. Goldhagen's book ("Hitler's Willing
Executioners") blames "all Germans, even little babies"
for the Holocaust?

Question Six
------------

On June 19, 1996, Ms. Manicka told the following whopper:

"A perfect example of lies by McFlea. Magnetic tape media
were not invented prior to the fifties. In fact, the
'plastics' which enabled manufacture of 'tape' were a
product of the fifties." (Huber, Brit Rabbi)

William Anderson, quoting from a reference work called "World of
Invention," offered the following rebuttal:

"The invention of magnetic recording tape is variously
attributed to J.A. O'Neill, who is said to have created
a paper version in 1927 in the United States, and the
German engineer Fritz Pfleumer, who in 1928 developed a
tape made by bonding a thin coating of oxide to strips of
either paper or film. It was Pfleumer who filed the
first audiotape patent in 1929...

"In 1935, the German electronics firm AEG produced a
prototype of a record/playback machine, called a magnetophon,
based on Pfleumer's ideas but using plastic tape. BASF went
on to refine the tape AEG had used, presenting the first
usable magnetic tape at the Berlin Fair in 1935. The first
public tape recording was made by the London Philharmonic
Orchestra at the BASF factory in Ludwigshafen, Germany, in
1936."

Mr. Anderson concluded by noting that the first plastics were
developed in 1836. (Anderson, Re: Brit Rabbi)

Question Six is an easy one: Why did you lie about these basic
issues?

[Long list of citations follows - hit BREAK to avoid them]

Work Cited

Anderson, William C. UseNet alt.revisionism. Subject: "Re: real
revisionism,WASHINGTON POST style," Mar 7 1996, Message-ID:
4hn8fb$1...@larry.cc.emory.edu

Anderson, William C. UseNet alt.revisionism. Subject: "
Re: Brit rabbi admits 6,000,000 is fraud," June 19, 1996.
Message-ID: 4q9jg2$k...@lendl.cc.emory.edu, archived in URL
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.m/lie-recording-tape

Huber, A. UseNet alt.politics.white-power. Subject: "Re: AIR PHOTOS
PROVE 'GAS CHAMBERS' ARE PROPAGANDA LIES," January 29, 1996.
Message-ID: 4eis3q$h...@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0196

--------. UseNet alt.politics.nationalism.white. Subject:
"Re: AIR PHOTOS PROVE "GAS CHAMBERS" ARE PROPAGANDA LIES,"
Feb 1, 1996, Message-ID: 4epopo$r...@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0296

--------. UseNet alt.politics.white-power. Subject: "
Re: 27th question," Feb 4, 1996, Message-ID:
4f10lf$15...@usenetp1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0296

-------. UseNet alt.politics.white-power. Subject: "Re: AIR PHOTOS
PROVE 'GAS CHAMBERS' ARE PROPAGANDA LIES," Feb 5, 1996.
Message-ID: 4f3u71$23...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0296

-------. UseNet alt.politics.white-power. Subject: "Re: AIR PHOTOS
PROVE 'GAS CHAMBERS' ARE PROPAGANDA LIES," Feb 5, 1996.
Message-ID: 4f3u71$23...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0296

-------. UseNet alt.politics.white-power. Subject: "Re: A
jewish dilemna!," Mar 7, 1996. Message-ID:
4hmp5u$12...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0396

--------. UseNet alt.politics.nationalism.white, Subject: "traitors
in the US of A," Mar 7 1996, Message-ID:
4hmoad$11...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com; UseNet alt.politics.white-power,
Subject: "NIZKOR should post this treachery," Mar 7 1996,
Message-ID: 4hmovb$1l...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com; UseNet
alt.politics.white-power, Subject: "Re: A jewish dilemna!,"
Mar 7 1996, Message-ID: 4hmpc6$d...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com;
UseNet alt.revisionism, Subject: "traitors amongst us," Mar 7,
1996, Message-ID: 4hmnr8$s...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com;
UseNet alt.conspiracy, Subject: "treachery at new heights,"
Mar 7, 1996, Message-ID: 4hmn5l$b...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com;
UseNet alt.skinheads. Subject: "laugh of the day/j*ws
supported holocaust," Message-ID: 4hn51u$8...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0396

--------.UseNet alt.revisionism. Subject: "Survivors's story decries
GOLDHAGEN's," 20 May 1996, Message-ID:
4npn7q$15...@useneta1.news.prodigy.com, archived within URL
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.a/huber.0596

Huber, M. UseNet alt.revisionism. Subject: "Re: Brit rabbi
admits 6,000,000 is fraud," June 19, 1996.
Message-ID: 4q8uqv$1k...@usenetz1.news.prodigy.com, archived in URL
http://www.almanac.bc.ca/cgi-bin/ftp.pl?people/h/huber.m/1996/huber.0696

Posted & emailed.

--
The Nizkor Project-----------------------http://www.nizkor.org
"If the struggle came first for you,
you would not discard my contribution"
(Ingrid "I run the Zundelsite" Rimland, in a letter to Zundel)

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 3, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/3/98
to

Sandra Huber wrote in message
<68lotf$gu0$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>...


>>KWANZAA'S FRAUDULENT ROOTS
>>
>>An Opinion by Tony Snow
>>
>>WASHINGTON -- Blacks in America have suffered an endless series of
>>insults and degradations, the latest of which goes by the name of
>>Kwanzaa.
>>
>>Ron Karenga (a/k/a Dr. Maulana Ron Karenga) invented the seven-day
>>feast (Dec. 26-Jan. 1) in 1966, branding it a black alternative to
>>Christmas. The idea was to celebrate the end of what he considered the
>>Christmas-season exploitation of African Americans.
>

>Sad, but no more sadder than the phony Chanukka, invented in 1866 as a
>rival to the celebration of the birth of Christ, by a rebbi who was
>infuriated with hate at seeing j*ws exchange gifts with Christians at
>ChristMass time.
>

Shouldn't this be another one of those lies that Huber -- who now apparently
is appearing in drag -- should be invited, repeatedly, to document?

Or is he just jealous that Jewish kids tend to get gifts for eight nights in
a row, while all that Santa ever brought him was a lump of coal?

NSWPP

unread,
Jan 3, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/3/98
to

The first time the National Alliance harassed, threatened, and
intimidated an Internet Service provider into denying us service,
we were offline for about 24 whole hours. The second time, it was
about 12 hours. The third time, six hours.

This time it was seamless. We were ready and we weren't off
Usenet for a single minute, nor did we miss a single NSNet.

There are two distinguishing characteristics of the National Alliance.
One is a craven physical cowardice; they are small, rodent-like
little men who scurry around in the dark, always seeking to hire
or cajole or dupe someone else into doing that which they are
too afraid to attempt.

The second distinguishing characteristic of the National Alliance
is personal failure---failure as men, failure in business and career,
failures as husbands and lovers, failures as fathers, failures as
academics (Dr. Pierce himself falls into all of these categories.)

The National Alliance has failed again to deny opposing views the
right to be heard. They will always fail.

And ooooooo----are we gonna TAWK about Willie Pierce! Tawk about
his ass fo' DAYS.....

88!
Harold A. Covington
www.nswpp.org


Sara

unread,
Jan 3, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/3/98
to

In article <68lotf$gu0$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>,
EEG...@prodigy.com (Sandra Huber) wrote:

> >KWANZAA'S FRAUDULENT ROOTS
> >
> >An Opinion by Tony Snow
> >
> >WASHINGTON -- Blacks in America have suffered an endless series of
> >insults and degradations, the latest of which goes by the name of
> >Kwanzaa.
> >
> >Ron Karenga (a/k/a Dr. Maulana Ron Karenga) invented the seven-day
> >feast (Dec. 26-Jan. 1) in 1966, branding it a black alternative to
> >Christmas. The idea was to celebrate the end of what he considered the
> >Christmas-season exploitation of African Americans.
>

> Sad, but no more sadder than the phony Chanukka, invented in 1866 as a
> rival to the celebration of the birth of Christ, by a rebbi who was
> infuriated with hate at seeing j*ws exchange gifts with Christians at
> ChristMass time.
>

Ms. Huber:

You are an idiot.

Please provide documentation that Hannukah was "invented" in 1866, rather
than a holiday celebrated by Jews for centuries.

Sara

--
"Yeder aizel hot lib tsu hern vi er alein hirzhet."
(Every ass likes to hear himself bray.)
Yiddish folk saying


Joseph Hertzlinger

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

In <34ac72b3....@news.mindspring.com> ns...@mindspring.com
(NSWPP) writes:

>"The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans.
>They are beasts."
>
>Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b

If you look at the Talmud it says that gentiles are beasts only for the
purpose of specifically Jewish rituals. Consider the sentence: "England
expects every man to do his duty." If someone explains that the word
"man" only applies to Englishmen, that does not mean he thinks only
Englishmen are human. (I've said that before, haven't I?) Kerithoth 6b
says that when gentiles are compared to cattle, the gentiles are
classified as human. Gentiles are never classified as cattle (see the
Jonah 4:11).


Davi-d

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

It certainly appears that the Dr. who founded Kwanza had socialism in
mind when he began to develop the holidays. Collective work and
Cooperative economics are terms that smack of pure socialism/communism.
But, then are we surprised?
--
The Global Warming theory is based upon JUNK SCIENCE!
Do not go to this site unless your a conservative!

http://junkscience.com/index.shtml

GMC0633

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

Subject: Re: Quotes From The Talmud
From: jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger)
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:53 AM EDT

>Gentiles are never classified as cattle.

This is a misleading statement, according to the Israel scholar Israel Shahak.
See his book Jewish Historu, Jewish Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years (London:
Pluot Press, 1994).
In polemics concerning the Talmud, Jews typically quote from watered-down
translations in which the more objectionable statements about non-Jews have
been disguised or entirely omitted. SHahak explains this in his book.
ov

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

GMC0633 wrote in message <19980104181...@ladder02.news.aol.com>...

Then learn Aramaic, Hebrew and Yiddish, and study the Talmud yourself.
Shouldn't be a problem for an aryan ubermensch like yourself.

Richard G. Phillips

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to Joel Rosenberg


Joel Rosenberg wrote:

===================================Phillips

Do you imagine it is all that difficult to construct allegations of that sort
against a political opponent who is completely in your power. Do you imagine
that Yockey is the first individual to be committed to a mental institution
because he was "inconvenient."
=====================

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

Richard G. Phillips wrote in message <34AFDC1A...@earthlink.net>...

Not at all. But do you imagine that it was easy or convenient to get out of
the Army in 1942 for schizophrenia, unless you were more than a mild loon?

As to Yockey's paranoia, it's confirmed quite clearly in his writing.

As to him being in somebody's power, that's silly. Up until the FBI yanked
his passport, even his supporters admit he traveled widely. Five years
after he had been diagnosed as a schizophreniac, he moved to Ireland.

> Do you imagine
>that Yockey is the first individual to be committed to a mental institution
>because he was "inconvenient."

I don't know that Yockey was committed at all, although he may well have
been. It often happens to people who hear disembodied voices. And he was
diagnosed as a nutcase in 1942 -- six years before he vanity-published
"Imperium", which quite clearly demonstrated his schizophrenia. (And even
then he published it under a pseudonym, presumably to protect him from his
presumed "enemies", who apparently forced him to forge passports some years
later, perhaps?)

And a political opponent of whom? He was an almost entirely *unknown*
knutcase until Carto started flogging his work posthumously.

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

Still, as a sort of embryonic Holocaust denier, Yockey does deserve some
study. He's the first case (and a nutcase, at that!) that I know of of
somebody who simultaneously expresses the belief that the Germans had every
reason to murder as many Jews as possible -- in Yockey's view, Jews are
germs in the Culture, and anti-Semitism is analogous to the formation of
antibodies to destroy the germs -- and denies that they would ever do such a
thing, that all evidence must be forged, etc.

In this he anticipates the party line later to be taken by the neoNazis and
their fellow travellers -- the rant probably most hysterically repeated when
the reviled Revilo Oliver delivered himself of his many similar
exhortations.

(The shortest version of it is the Huberistic "Never! Again!", from the
mind -- such as it is -- of Edmonton's own William Grosvenor.)

cyb...@globaleyes.net

unread,
Jan 4, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/4/98
to

One thing i will tell you, dont EVER, EVER, push the issue when you cant
get female or minority troops to fall in line.... I was ran out of the Army
for incidences such as this... I got sick of being hoodwinked and
undermined by troops going above my head to complain about so called
abuses... Hell, when i first joined the military, a good left hook across
the face was all the satisfaction you would get from not following the
chain of command when you had a complaint... So, the military spent aprox.
200 thousand dollars to put me through training that boasted a 55%
attrition only to let me go over an incident between myself and a couple of
female soldiers who didnt seem to think rank meant anything.. I never hit
them or abused them,but i would do routine inspections after they burned me
on a command inspection to make sure they were in regulation. Seems as
though they never heard how a big portion of my conflict with the officer
corps started while trying to save them from recieving article 15s and
being put back on phase..
Never exert authority while under a TRADOC unit, even if you have 4+ years
of service and are sergeant or above... It will only make you a target.

Jerry L. White wrote:

> If the military was honoring it's oath to the Constitution: They would
> know that it is Congress that regulates the military, not the Executive
> branch of govt't.
>

> In a previous article, ns...@mindspring.com (NSWPP) says:
>

> >[from RESISTANCE #115, May 16th, 1997]
> >
> > PURGING THE MILITARY
> >
> > In a startling parallel to the 1930s Stalin régime,
> >ever since the Clintons took office they have occupied
> >themselves with quietly purging the U. S. military of
> >senior White male officers who are politically incorrect,

> > "This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
> >mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
> >Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM
> >
> >

Joseph Hertzlinger

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

In <19980104181...@ladder02.news.aol.com> gmc...@aol.com

(GMC0633) writes:
>
>Subject: Re: Quotes From The Talmud
>From: jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger)
>Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:53 AM EDT
>
>>Gentiles are never classified as cattle.
>
>This is a misleading statement, according to the Israel scholar Israel
>Shahak. See his book Jewish Historu, Jewish Religion: The Weight of
>3000 Years (London: Pluot Press, 1994). In polemics concerning the
>Talmud, Jews typically quote from watered-down translations in which
>the more objectionable statements about non-Jews have been disguised
>or entirely omitted. SHahak explains this in his book.
>ov

There is a passage in Kerithoth 6b which first says that only Jews are
classifies as human. (This is done for the purpose of showing that
gentiles need not be prosecuted for using annointing oil for profane
purposes.) The passage then quotes verses in which gentile are
classified as human and says that was done to show they aren't cattle.

The passage in question:

>Our Rabbis have taught: He who pours the oil of anointing over cattle
>or vessels is not guilty; if over heathens or the dead, he is not
>guilty. The law relating to cattle and vessels is right, for it is
>written: Upon the flesh of man [adam] shall it not be poured; and
>cattle and vessels are not man. Also with regard to the dead, [it is
>plausible] that he is exempt, since after death one is called corpse
>and not man. But why is one exempt in the case of heathens; are they
>not in the category of adam? — No, it is written: And ye my sheep, the
>sheep of my pasture, are adam [man]: Ye are called adam but heathens
>are not called ‘adam. But is it not written: And the persons [adam]
>were sixteen thousand? — Because it is used in opposition to cattle.
>But is it not written: And should I not have pity on Nineveh [that
>great city, wherein are more than six score thousand persons [adam]? —
>This too is used in opposition to cattle.

If you have a better translation, post it or forever hold your peace.


toejam

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

Joel Rosenberg wrote in message <68p2k0$mm8$1...@blackice.winternet.com>...


>
>Richard G. Phillips wrote in message <34AFDC1A...@earthlink.net>...
>>
>>
>>Joel Rosenberg wrote:
>>
>>> NSWPP wrote in message <34ad0206....@news.mindspring.com>...
>>>
>>> >
>>> >

>>> > "This destiny does not tire, nor can it be broken, and its
>>> >mantle of strength descends upon those in its service." - Francis
>>> >Parker Yockey, IMPERIUM
>>> >
>>>

>>> This is, perhaps, the same Francis Parker Yockey who received a medical

< sniped jew shit>
>>>> gooffy jew


A Huber

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

Subject: Re: Quotes From The Talmud
>From: jher...@ix.netcom.com(Joseph Hertzlinger)
>Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 12:53 AM EDT
>
>>Gentiles are never classified as cattle.


Goyim MEANS cattle


A Huber

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

>> Sad, but no more sadder than the phony Chanukka, invented in 1866 as a

>> rival to the celebration of the birth of Christ, by a rebbi who was
>> infuriated with hate at seeing j*ws exchange gifts with Christians at

>> ChristMass time.
>>
>Ms. Huber:
>
>You are an idiot.
>
>Please provide documentation that Hannukah was "invented" in 1866,
rather
>than a holiday celebrated by Jews for centuries.
>
>Sara

I will ask Sandra to repost the previous article no your ditsy
chanukkkkkkka


A Huber

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

>
>--
>"Yeder aizel hot lib tsu hern vi er alein hirzhet."
>(Every ass likes to hear himself bray.)
> Yiddish folk saying

Being a Khazar, you should know.
>


Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 5, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/5/98
to

A Huber wrote in message <68rh3p$10o2$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>...

And Huber is an ancient Babylonian word meaning "ignorant dipshit."
>

GMC0633

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

"The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides' Mishneh
Torah -- replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles
but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name
the author adds piously: 'May the name of the wicked perish') -- was published
unexpurgated in Rome in the year 1480." Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish
Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years (London, 1994).
Please read this book before telling us what your modern English-language
Talmuds say.
ov

Joseph Hertzlinger

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

In <68rh3p$10o2$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com> EEG...@prodigy.com
(A Huber) writes:

>Goyim MEANS cattle

Goyim MEANS nations.

In Genesis 18:4, Abraham (who started the whole shebang) is called a
father of many goyim.

In Genesis 25:22, Rebecca is pregnant with two goyim. One of these is
Jacob, the ancestor of the Israelites.

In Deuteronomy 32:8, God divides up the Earth among the goyim. Israel
is one of the goyim.

In Isaiah 14:18, the kings of the goyim lie in glory (except the king
of Babylon).

In Jeremiah 1:5, he is appointed a prophet to the goyim.

Have I made my point yet?

Joseph Hertzlinger

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

In <19980106004...@ladder01.news.aol.com> gmc...@aol.com

(GMC0633) writes:
>
>"The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides'
>Mishneh Torah

>Please read this book before telling us what your modern
>English-language Talmuds say.

That made a little bit of sense.

Who are you and what have you done with gmc...@aol.com?

Do you plan to take the same advice?


Doug Berry

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 14:57:28 -0600, cyb...@globaleyes.net wrote:

>One thing i will tell you, dont EVER, EVER, push the issue when you cant
>get female or minority troops to fall in line.... I was ran out of the Army
>for incidences such as this... I got sick of being hoodwinked and
>undermined by troops going above my head to complain about so called
>abuses... Hell, when i first joined the military, a good left hook across
>the face was all the satisfaction you would get from not following the
>chain of command when you had a complaint... So, the military spent aprox.
>200 thousand dollars to put me through training that boasted a 55%
>attrition only to let me go over an incident between myself and a couple of
>female soldiers who didnt seem to think rank meant anything.. I never hit
>them or abused them,but i would do routine inspections after they burned me
>on a command inspection to make sure they were in regulation. Seems as
>though they never heard how a big portion of my conflict with the officer
>corps started while trying to save them from recieving article 15s and
>being put back on phase..
>Never exert authority while under a TRADOC unit, even if you have 4+ years
>of service and are sergeant or above... It will only make you a target.

What was your MOS? When did you enlist? What unit were you in that
was under TRADOC?

Excuse the questions, but I don't believe you were ever a soldier, at
least not one in a position of any authority. It's been over twenty
years since striking a subordinate was acceptible behavoir.

Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

Doug Berry wrote in message <34b25c6...@news.wenet.net>...


>On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 14:57:28 -0600, cyb...@globaleyes.net wrote:
>

>>One thing i will tell you, dont EVER, EVER, push the issue when you cant
>>get female or minority troops to fall in line.... I was ran out of the
Army
>>for incidences such as this... I got sick of being hoodwinked and
>>undermined by troops going above my head to complain about so called
>>abuses... Hell, when i first joined the military, a good left hook across
>>the face was all the satisfaction you would get from not following the
>>chain of command when you had a complaint... So, the military spent aprox.
>>200 thousand dollars to put me through training that boasted a 55%
>>attrition only to let me go over an incident between myself and a couple
of
>>female soldiers who didnt seem to think rank meant anything.. I never hit
>>them or abused them,but i would do routine inspections after they burned
me
>>on a command inspection to make sure they were in regulation. Seems as
>>though they never heard how a big portion of my conflict with the officer
>>corps started while trying to save them from recieving article 15s and
>>being put back on phase..
>>Never exert authority while under a TRADOC unit, even if you have 4+ years
>>of service and are sergeant or above... It will only make you a target.
>

>What was your MOS? When did you enlist? What unit were you in that
>was under TRADOC?
>
>Excuse the questions, but I don't believe you were ever a soldier, at
>least not one in a position of any authority. It's been over twenty
>years since striking a subordinate was acceptible behavoir.
>--


Rather more than that -- didn't Patton almost get booted out for it?

Derek Bell

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

EEG...@prodigy.com (A Huber) writes:
>Goyim MEANS cattle

Where did you get this from - your febrile imagination?

Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie |The road to hell is paved with
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| melting snowballs
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | -- Larry Wall

Doug Berry

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

On Tue, 6 Jan 1998 12:02:20 -0600, "Joel Rosenberg"
<jo...@winternet.com> wrote:

>
>Doug Berry wrote in message <34b25c6...@news.wenet.net>...
>>On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 14:57:28 -0600, cyb...@globaleyes.net wrote:
>>

>>>One thing i will tell you, dont EVER, EVER, push the issue when you cant
>>>get female or minority troops to fall in line.... I was ran out of the
>Army
>>>for incidences such as this... I got sick of being hoodwinked and
>>>undermined by troops going above my head to complain about so called
>>>abuses... Hell, when i first joined the military, a good left hook across
>>>the face was all the satisfaction you would get from not following the
>>>chain of command when you had a complaint... So, the military spent aprox.
>>>200 thousand dollars to put me through training that boasted a 55%
>>>attrition only to let me go over an incident between myself and a couple
>of
>>>female soldiers who didnt seem to think rank meant anything.. I never hit
>>>them or abused them,but i would do routine inspections after they burned
>me
>>>on a command inspection to make sure they were in regulation. Seems as
>>>though they never heard how a big portion of my conflict with the officer
>>>corps started while trying to save them from recieving article 15s and
>>>being put back on phase..
>>>Never exert authority while under a TRADOC unit, even if you have 4+ years
>>>of service and are sergeant or above... It will only make you a target.
>>

>>What was your MOS? When did you enlist? What unit were you in that
>>was under TRADOC?
>>
>>Excuse the questions, but I don't believe you were ever a soldier, at
>>least not one in a position of any authority. It's been over twenty
>>years since striking a subordinate was acceptible behavoir.
>>--
>
>
>Rather more than that -- didn't Patton almost get booted out for it?

Patton had to apologize to the entire 7th Army. It remained
acceptable throughout the draft era for Drill Instructors to get
physical with recruits. That ended with the all-volunteer force.

Sara

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

In article <19980106004...@ladder01.news.aol.com>,
gmc...@aol.com (GMC0633) wrote:

> "The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides' Mishneh

> Torah -- replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all
Gentiles
> but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name
> the author adds piously: 'May the name of the wicked perish') -- was
published
> unexpurgated in Rome in the year 1480." Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish
> Religion: The Weight of 3000 Years (London, 1994).

> Please read this book before telling us what your modern English-language
> Talmuds say.

> ov

"GMC,"

Below s part of the text from a Talmudic scholar, who responded to a
question from me regarding the kinds of quotes seen above.

-------BEGIN QUOTE--------

Deja vu... It seems that the quotations you asked about are the same ones
that appeared in a (forged) pamphlet called "facts are facts" that I had to
refute when I served as expert witness at the second Keegstra trial in 1992--he
was teaching that material in his infamous Eckville classroom. Most of the
quotes are blatantly fictitious and very easy to discount.

Yes, these are the same texts that were taught in Mr. Keegstra's
classes, and have long been circulated by various American antisemitic groups.
Most of them are garbled from a work by I.V. Pranaitis, a slimy turn-of-the
century Russian charlattan who served as an "expert witness" at the nototious
Mendel Beiliss blood libel where he was literally laughed out of court for his
displays of ignorance under cross-examination!

...

"The Jews are human beings , but the nations of the world are not human
beings but ^ beasts."-
^ -Baba Mecia 114, 6 [i.e.: 114b].

Apparently a deliberate mistranslation. The passage deals with the technical
rules of corpse-impurity which, according to the author of this text, apply to
Jews and not to gentiles. In this connection Ezekiel 34:31 is cited: "And ye My
sheep [referring to Israel], the sheep of My pasture, are _men [Hebrew:
"adam"]_, and I am your God, saith the Lord God." From a careful midrashic
reading of this Biblical verse, Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai deduced "Only "ye" [i.e.,
Israel, not other nations] are designated "adam," in the sense that only Jewish
corpses and graves generate impurity according to Numbers 19:14: "This is the
law: when a _man ['adam']_ dieth in a tent, every one that cometh into the
tent...shall be unclean seven days..." The passage is legal and exegetical, not
theological. If anything, it seems to put Jews on a lower footing than non-Jews.
Typically, the words "but beasts" were added on by whoever put this list
together. They do not appear in the original.

^ 3. "Jehovah created the non-Jew in human form so that the Jew would
^ not have to be served by beasts.
^ The non-Jew is consequently an animal in human form, and commanded
^ to serve the Jew day and night."-
^ -Midrasch Talpioth, p225-L.

I was unable to check this reference in my extensive Judaica library. The book
"Midrash Talpiyyot" is appparently an obscure eighteenth-century Kabbalistic
work that is little known and carries no authority whatsoever. Even if the
citation were correct (which seems doubtful in light of the other examples on
this list, and the fact that Jews never employ the designation "Jehovah"), it is
hard to imagine what could be proven from it about Judaism or the Talmud.

...

"Goyim" literally refers to the "nations." In the Bible that includes
Israel, but in Rabbinic works it designates the other nations of the
world. Of course during Talmudic times the nations in question were the
ones that Jews came in contact with, principally the Romans--there were no
other monotheistic peoples around then, and the Romans, the "kingdom of
evil," were despised for their cruelty, lewdness and immorality--similar
views are found in Paul and in Revelation, and the accusations have some
historical basis. Gentile Christians were not very well known at the time
that the Talmud was redacted, and Jewish Christians are mentioned
surprisingly rarely, as an internal heresy. They are referred to as
"Minim" though the term encompassed several "heretical" views, especially
dualists and gnostics. Medieval Jewish law for the most part did not
understand these statements as applying to the monotheistic religions.

I don't have time to check all the citations from Shahak. A few are
clearly mistranslated (intentionally, I suspect), but most are probably
based on actual sources. Several of them fall into the category of
virulent anti-Roman "passive resistance" measures intended to loosen their
occupation on the land of Israel. Pagans are indeed discriminated against
in Jewish law, as Jews were under Roman administration (the comments were
of course theoretical, since Jews did not administer their own judicial
system). There are indeed a handful of anti-Christian traditions,
reflecting the fierce controversies of the time. There is also a lot of
"state of the art" medical advice that, of course, does not stand up to
modern standards.

The Talmud is a mixed bag. It is a collection of many contradictory
opinions, and not everything in it has been accepted as valid by
posterity. This is true about modern Judaism as well, where (especially
among the Israel "religious right"), several Rabbis have voiced views
which are clearly racist and reprehensible.

---------END QUOTE---------

Sara

Uriah Steinberg

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to


Joel Rosenberg wrote:

> Sandra Huber wrote in message
> <68lotf$gu0$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>...

> >>KWANZAA'S FRAUDULENT ROOTS
> >>
> >>An Opinion by Tony Snow
> >>
> >>WASHINGTON -- Blacks in America have suffered an endless series of
> >>insults and degradations, the latest of which goes by the name of
> >>Kwanzaa.
> >>
> >>Ron Karenga (a/k/a Dr. Maulana Ron Karenga) invented the seven-day
> >>feast (Dec. 26-Jan. 1) in 1966, branding it a black alternative to
> >>Christmas. The idea was to celebrate the end of what he considered the
> >>Christmas-season exploitation of African Americans.
> >

> >Sad, but no more sadder than the phony Chanukka, invented in 1866 as a
> >rival to the celebration of the birth of Christ, by a rebbi who was
> >infuriated with hate at seeing j*ws exchange gifts with Christians at
> >ChristMass time.
> >
>

> Shouldn't this be another one of those lies that Huber -- who now apparently
> is appearing in drag -- should be invited, repeatedly, to document?
>
> Or is he just jealous that Jewish kids tend to get gifts for eight nights in
> a row, while all that Santa ever brought him was a lump of coal?


I am not concerned about Jews having toys. That's fine with me.

However, I know when something has been done simply to compete with Christianity
in a manner consistent with the goal of diluting and destroying it. It is for
this reason that the cabal of liberal Marxist commies have constructed
alternative festivals. Most Jews don't give one crap about chahanukka. It's just
a sort of little thing to do by way of having fun by giving gifts, and, in so
doing making certain that little Rachel doesn't get the idea that being Jewish
leaves you out of the presents in December. As for Kwanzaa, the silly little
blacks, being mental children for the most part, will follow anything you swing
in front of their faces. They live in a minute-to-minute semi-conscious state,
except for a few who are slightly more intelligent than the feebleminded
condition of most of them.

One thing for sure is that Kwanzaa reeks of Jewishness. It is Marxist in its
call for unity and togetherness, a very communist concept. Personal
irresponsibility is the main focus of the festival, another Marxist sentiment.
And we know who the Marxists are a reflection of.


Joel Rosenberg

unread,
Jan 6, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/6/98
to

Doug Berry wrote in message <34b2b1c3...@news.wenet.net>...


>On Tue, 6 Jan 1998 12:02:20 -0600, "Joel Rosenberg"
><jo...@winternet.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>Doug Berry wrote in message <34b25c6...@news.wenet.net>...
>>>On Sun, 04 Jan 1998 14:57:28 -0600, cyb...@globaleyes.net wrote:
>>>

>>>What was your MOS? When did you enlist? What unit were you in that
>>>was under TRADOC?
>>>
>>>Excuse the questions, but I don't believe you were ever a soldier, at
>>>least not one in a position of any authority. It's been over twenty
>>>years since striking a subordinate was acceptible behavoir.
>>>--
>>
>>
>>Rather more than that -- didn't Patton almost get booted out for it?
>
>Patton had to apologize to the entire 7th Army.

As well he should have. (I'm a great fan of Patton's -- he was terribly
flawed by fascinating person -- but he was way out of line during the
slapping incidents, and he knew it.)

>It remained
>acceptable throughout the draft era for Drill Instructors to get
>physical with recruits. That ended with the all-volunteer force.


Are we talking legally acceptable (I think that's demonstrably not so), or
accepted in practice if not caught at it (in which case you're probably
right)?

According to an ex-Marine of my acquaintance, it was absolutely forbidden
for a Marine DI to lay hands on a boot during the late sixties (except, of
course, in self-defense or something similar). And, legends to the
contrary, the Marines were *not* an all-volunteer force during the Vietnam
era; some small, but real, percentage of those folks sent to Boot were
draftees.


John Morris

unread,
Jan 7, 1998, 3:00:00 AM1/7/98