Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

no bullshit

251 views
Skip to first unread message

William Daffer

unread,
Feb 22, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/22/99
to
David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> writes:

> Danny Sirtes wrote:
>
> > >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> > >entire Holocaust?
> >
> > Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> > it's
> > absolutely rediculous !
>
> Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
> vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
> bunch of them.
>

First off, that wasn't his point. But let that pass...

Name one other historical event within the twentieth century of
similar scale that is less vague.

whd

Danny Sirtes

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
>OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
>entire Holocaust?

Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
it's
absolutely rediculous !

It's an, admittedly quite clever, distortion of falsficationism.
Let's make an anology:
My Hypothesis: There are more than 5 billion living human-beeings on
earth.
Then you are asking: WHICH human-beeing has to be dead, so you would
give up
your hypothesis ?
Of course there is no sensefull answer to this question !
Falsification is asking for a possible SCENARIO if true would falsify
the
hypothesis.
I can give you one easily:
If we find an island in the Pacific, where all the the 6 million jews,
which we
are sure to be slaughtered by the Nazis, are living happily than
everybody
would give up the historical hypothesis of the holocaust.
So this hypothesis is falsifiable !!!
So why don't you just give up and use your cleverness for something more
honest
and humanistic than this bullshit !

David

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to

Danny Sirtes wrote:

> >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> >entire Holocaust?
>
> Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> it's
> absolutely rediculous !

Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as


vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
bunch of them.

>


> It's an, admittedly quite clever, distortion of falsficationism.
>

Not at all. It is a demonstration of an area where falsificationism can't
apply.

> Let's make an anology:
> My Hypothesis: There are more than 5 billion living human-beeings on
> earth.
> Then you are asking: WHICH human-beeing has to be dead, so you would
> give up
> your hypothesis ?
> Of course there is no sensefull answer to this question !
>

Largely, I fear, because the question is utterly incomprehensible!

> Falsification is asking for a possible SCENARIO if true would falsify
> the
> hypothesis.

No. For a theory to be falsifiable it must generate hypotheses that can can
be fairly and rigorously tested and, if falsified, refute the entire theory.

Example: take the theory that clonazepam impairs hearing. You formulate the
null hypothesis that a group given clonazepam will be no different in
hearing from a control group given a placebo. If you find subsequently that
the clonazepam group has significantly greater hearing impairment than the
control group, you can reject the null hypothesis and 'corroborate' (to use
Popper's term) the theory that clonazepam causes impairment.

Care to devise a similar test for the Holocaust?

Thought not.

>
> I can give you one easily:
> If we find an island in the Pacific, where all the the 6 million jews,
> which we
> are sure to be slaughtered by the Nazis, are living happily than
> everybody
> would give up the historical hypothesis of the holocaust.
> So this hypothesis is falsifiable !!!
>

Let me repeat the question I asked:

>OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
>entire Holocaust?

Note the word 'document'.

Sure, we can dream up hypothetical falsificatory scenarios for any of these
great systems. Christ could return to earth and say 'oops -- I was wrong,
there's no God and actually Satan rules'. We could discover secret writings
by Freud saying that everything he wrote was a load of bollocks. Ditto with
Marx.

The critical issue is whether we can devise a test to falsify the system,
not whether we can dream up some improbable scenario under which they might
be falsified. Falsifiability is a methodology for testing.

My point is that the Holocaust cannot be tested in that way. No matter how
many documents are exposed as forgeries, the exterminationists can always
claim, correctly, that such exposures have no bearing on the historicity of
the 'Holocaust'.

> So why don't you just give up and use your cleverness for something more
> honest
> and humanistic than this bullshit !

Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people, aided
and abetted by liberals and democrats. The new world order has destroyed
ancient civilizations and age-old values. It has replaced them with a grey
cosmopolitan drabness, a meaninglessness, a nothingness. It has given rise
to untold horrors on a vast scale in Africa and Asia. It is now threatening
to dragoon us all into a one-world superstate.Where once there was great art
and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums and the
scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism, now
there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.

I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to aspire
once more for a new and better world.

David


John Morris

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
In <36D22296...@cableinet.co.uk>, on Tue, 23 Feb 1999 03:37:58
+0000, David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:

>Danny Sirtes wrote:

>> >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
>> >entire Holocaust?

>> Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
>> it's absolutely rediculous !

>Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
>vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
>bunch of them.

You could do as Mr. Sirtis suggests below and propose an alternate
interpretation of history. But, as I understand from you, the mission
of Revisionism is to attack single documents, testimonies, and the
like.

>> It's an, admittedly quite clever, distortion of falsficationism.

>Not at all. It is a demonstration of an area where falsificationism can't
>apply.

Holocaust history is quite falsifiable. Just produce and laternate
history.

>> Let's make an anology:
>> My Hypothesis: There are more than 5 billion living human-beeings on earth.
>> Then you are asking: WHICH human-beeing has to be dead, so you would give up
>> your hypothesis ?
>> Of course there is no sensefull answer to this question !

>Largely, I fear, because the question is utterly incomprehensible!

It is a problem with the question.

>> Falsification is asking for a possible SCENARIO if true would falsify
>> the hypothesis.

>No. For a theory to be falsifiable it must generate hypotheses that can can
>be fairly and rigorously tested and, if falsified, refute the entire theory.

And with a set of events as complex as the Holocaust, the only way to
falsify it is to come up with an alternate story that takes into
account that complexity.

But, as I understand from you, Revisionism has the more modest goal of
playing dog in the manger.

>Example: take the theory that clonazepam impairs hearing. You formulate the
>null hypothesis that a group given clonazepam will be no different in
>hearing from a control group given a placebo. If you find subsequently that
>the clonazepam group has significantly greater hearing impairment than the
>control group, you can reject the null hypothesis and 'corroborate' (to use
>Popper's term) the theory that clonazepam causes impairment.

>Care to devise a similar test for the Holocaust?

Sure. You just need to learn to think on an appropriate scale.

Between five and six million Jews disappeared between 1941 and 1945
inclusive. The evidence shows that they were shot, gassed, and starved
as the result of a the policies of the Nazi government of Germany.

>Thought not.

Wrong again.

>> I can give you one easily:
>> If we find an island in the Pacific, where all the the 6 million jews, which we
>> are sure to be slaughtered by the Nazis, are living happily than everybody
>> would give up the historical hypothesis of the holocaust.
>> So this hypothesis is falsifiable !!!

Look. There it is: the falsifiability test you wanted.

>Let me repeat the question I asked:

>>OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
>>entire Holocaust?

>Note the word 'document'.

So noted.

>Sure, we can dream up hypothetical falsificatory scenarios for any of these
>great systems. Christ could return to earth and say 'oops -- I was wrong,
>there's no God and actually Satan rules'. We could discover secret writings
>by Freud saying that everything he wrote was a load of bollocks. Ditto with
>Marx.

Boy, do you have a limited set of critical tools.

>The critical issue is whether we can devise a test to falsify the system,
>not whether we can dream up some improbable scenario under which they might
>be falsified. Falsifiability is a methodology for testing.

Easy. Give us your alternative version of events.

>My point is that the Holocaust cannot be tested in that way.

Well, could you test the historicity of World War II?

> No matter how
>many documents are exposed as forgeries, the exterminationists can always
>claim, correctly, that such exposures have no bearing on the historicity of
>the 'Holocaust'.

It would be a lot more difficult to


>> So why don't you just give up and use your cleverness for something more
>> honest
>> and humanistic than this bullshit !

>Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people, aided
>and abetted by liberals and democrats.

Demonstrably false. But a good segue into some nice purple rhetoric:

> The new world order has destroyed
>ancient civilizations and age-old values. It has replaced them with a grey
>cosmopolitan drabness, a meaninglessness, a nothingness. It has given rise
>to untold horrors on a vast scale in Africa and Asia. It is now threatening

>to dragoon us all into a one-world superstate. Where once there was great art


>and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums and the
>scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism, now
>there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.

Do you rehearse this shit for the Cockney boys while driving your
Rover down to London for the meeting?

>I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to aspire
>once more for a new and better world.

Except that what you aspire to is neither nobler nor better but a
descent into the barbarism whose passing fifty years ago you lament.

Surely you haven't forgotten your brave speech entitled, "I Have a
Nightmare":

Third, National Socialism was a revolutionary movement that
was based upon a wonderful dream. Forget the stories of corpses
for a moment, Mr G, and imagine a world very different from the
world we inhabit today. Imagine a world free from the wars that
have scarred the face of this tired old planet since the beginning
of time; a world with no extreme poverty, with no disease, with
no exploitation of worker by employer, no jolting financial
crises (with the misery that such crises entail) -- a world
united in a common purpose and a common vision.
http://x2.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=390244357


--
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>

Charlie Chester

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
David wrote:

> Danny Sirtes wrote:
>
> > >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> > >entire Holocaust?
> >
> > Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> > it's
> > absolutely rediculous !
>
> Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
> vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
> bunch of them.
>
> >

> > It's an, admittedly quite clever, distortion of falsficationism.
> >
>
> Not at all. It is a demonstration of an area where falsificationism can't
> apply.
>

> > Let's make an anology:
> > My Hypothesis: There are more than 5 billion living human-beeings on
> > earth.
> > Then you are asking: WHICH human-beeing has to be dead, so you would give
> up your hypothesis ?
> > Of course there is no sensefull answer to this question !
> >
>
> Largely, I fear, because the question is utterly incomprehensible!
>

> > Falsification is asking for a possible SCENARIO if true would falsify the
> hypothesis.
>

> No. For a theory to be falsifiable it must generate hypotheses that can be


> fairly and rigorously tested and, if falsified, refute the entire theory.
>

> Example: take the theory that clonazepam impairs hearing. You formulate the
> null hypothesis that a group given clonazepam will be no different in
> hearing from a control group given a placebo. If you find subsequently that
> the clonazepam group has significantly greater hearing impairment than the
> control group, you can reject the null hypothesis and 'corroborate' (to use
> Popper's term) the theory that clonazepam causes impairment.
>
> Care to devise a similar test for the Holocaust?

> Thought not.
>

You're obviously getting a little confused Dave. You're mixing up scientific
theories (which of course must always be falsifiable or they'd just be pseudo
science) & the names we give to major historical events. If no *single* test can
be devised to falsify the Holocaust it's because it isn't a single event, taking
place in a single location over one short period of time. The Holocaust is a
convenient name for a process comprising thousands of events, taking place at
thousands of locations over several years.

To avoid your mental confusion Dave you need to compare like with like. So, how
are other wide ranging historical events - e.g the fall of the Roman Empire, the
French Revolution, Stalinism, World War I, World War II, the Cold War -
falsifiable in a way which the Holocaust isn't? Please devise a single test for
each of those historical events which could "falsify" them.

> > I can give you one easily:
> > If we find an island in the Pacific, where all the the 6 million jews,
> which we
> > are sure to be slaughtered by the Nazis, are living happily than
> > everybody > would give up the historical hypothesis of the holocaust. So
> this hypothesis is falsifiable !!!
> >
>

> Let me repeat the question I asked:
>
> >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> >entire Holocaust?
>

What single document, if exposed as a forgery would refute World War II, the
Crimean War, the Industrial Revolution, etc, etc?

> Note the word 'document'.
>

> Sure, we can dream up hypothetical falsificatory scenarios for any of these
> great systems. Christ could return to earth and say 'oops -- I was wrong,
> there's no God and actually Satan rules'. We could discover secret writings by
> Freud saying that everything he wrote was a load of bollocks. Ditto with Marx.
>

> The critical issue is whether we can devise a test to falsify the system,
> not whether we can dream up some improbable scenario under which they might
> be falsified. Falsifiability is a methodology for testing.

So devise tests to falsify all the events listed above Dave.

> My point is that the Holocaust cannot be tested in that way. No matter how


> many documents are exposed as forgeries, the exterminationists can always
> claim, correctly, that such exposures have no bearing on the historicity of
> the 'Holocaust'.
>

That's not true. If you deniers were doing the great job you always claim then
eventually you would have a preponderance of evidence. More
documents/testimonies/photos/physical proofs etc would have been falsified than
not. At that point it would be reasonable for historians to abandon the accepted
view of the Holocaust & look for an alternative explanation.Exposure of
forgeries (which the deniers have never managed) *would* have a bearing on the
historicity of the Holocaust but it would be cumulative. It's not hard to
understand Dave & it applies to all large historical events.

> > So why don't you just give up and use your cleverness for something more
> honest and humanistic than this bullshit !
>
> Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people, aided

> and abetted by liberals and democrats. The new world order has destroyed


> ancient civilizations and age-old values. It has replaced them with a grey
> cosmopolitan drabness, a meaninglessness, a nothingness. It has given rise to
> untold horrors on a vast scale in Africa and Asia. It is now threatening to

> dragoon us all into a one-world superstate.Where once there was great art and


> great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums and the
> scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism, now there
> is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.
>

> I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to aspire
> once more for a new and better world.
>

You're slipping into Vange mode here Dave. You're not going to start quoting
Mein Kampf at us are you? "Jungle drums" eh? You sound like a 1950s moralist
predicting that rock & roll will turn all the kids into savages.
BTW what country are you living in Dave? Can't be England since that's gone from
a dreary grey uniform drabness to a wonderful cosmopolitan vibrancy.
Charlie Chester
Manchester - England


Mark Van Alstine

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
In article <36D2B374...@csu.ac.uk>, Charlie Chester <gu...@csu.ac.uk>
wrote:

> David wrote:

[snip]

> > many documents are exposed as forgeries, the exterminationists can always
> > claim, correctly, that such exposures have no bearing on the historicity of
> > the 'Holocaust'.
> >
>
> That's not true. If you deniers were doing the great job you always claim
> then eventually you would have a preponderance of evidence. More
> documents/testimonies/photos/physical proofs etc would have been falsified
> than not. At that point it would be reasonable for historians to abandon
> the accepted view of the Holocaust & look for an alternative
> explanation.Exposure of forgeries (which the deniers have never managed)
> *would* have a bearing on the historicity of the Holocaust but it would be
> cumulative. It's not hard to understand Dave & it applies to all large
> historical events.

That DavidM's ignorance of the time-honored historiographic method of
corroborative evidence is showing again should come as no suprise. It
appears to be a common intellectual failing of Holocaust deniers. That
David cannot seem to grasp that Histsorians are just as certain that the
Holocaust happened as they are about the death of Julius Ceasar and JFK is
most revealing as to his general ignorance of the methods historians
employ to determine the veracity of a historical event. An excellent
illustration of this method is given by Keith Windschuttle:

<begin quote>

...When historians accept observations about he past as evidence that an
event really happened, they are always reluctant to take one report as
proof of this. They prefer the _corroboration_ of observations from many
observers. This is what they have with the death of Julius Ceasar. Every
report they have ever seen about the Roman Empire around 44 BC, no matter
how close or how removed the source, corroborates the assassination, and
not one has yet turned up to falsify or even raise doubts about whether
the event occured. We could, if we chose, calculate the probability that
this event, out of all the possible things that might have been observed
around him at the time, did occur. For every corroboration, the odds in
favor of the hypothesis that he was killed grow geometrically. There comes
a point with histroical corroboration about such a well-recorded event
where any other scenario besides the one we have accepted becomes
impossible. Because we a re dealing with a finite world- the planet Earth
in 44 BC -we can rule out the prospect that somewhere within an infinite
number of scenarios lies one in which Caesar was not killed. Logical
possibilities based on infinity do not count in this or any historical
case. There is, in fact so much corroboration about this particular
assassination scenario that is literally impossible for there to be a
non-assassination scenario that fits everything else we know about what
was happening in Rome at the time. We know that Julius Ceasar was killed
in Rome in 44 BC just as surely as we know that John F. Kennedy was killed
in Dallas in 1963.

<end quote>

Source: Windschuttle, _The Killing of History_, p.203.

To borrow Windschuttle's analogy, there is likewise so much corroboration
of observations about the Holocaust that it too is literally impossible
for there to be a non-Holocaust "scenario" that fits everything we know
about what happened in Europe between 1933 and 1945. We know that the
Holocaust happend in the late 1930's and early 1940's as surely as we know
that the Soviet Union disintegrated and Berlin wall fell in the late
1980's and early 1990's.

[snip]

Mark

--

"Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and
evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between
political parties--but right through every human heart--and all
human hearts." -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn, "The Gulag Archipelago"

David

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
Erk. My news server goes kaput for a day and everyone posts at me! Ho
well, let's make a start.

> > David wrote:
>
> [snip]


>
> > > many documents are exposed as forgeries, the exterminationists can always
> > > claim, correctly, that such exposures have no bearing on the historicity of
> > > the 'Holocaust'.
> > >
> >
> > That's not true. If you deniers were doing the great job you always claim
> > then eventually you would have a preponderance of evidence.

Which you would dismiss as not relevant. Or which you would, correctly
but irrelevantly, say does not 'refute' the Holocaust.

> >More
> > documents/testimonies/photos/physical proofs etc would have been falsified
> > than not. At that point it would be reasonable for historians to abandon
> > the accepted view of the Holocaust & look for an alternative
> > explanation.

Or modify it. As has already been done.

> >Exposure of forgeries (which the deniers have never managed)
> > *would* have a bearing on the historicity of the Holocaust but it would be
> > cumulative. It's not hard to understand Dave & it applies to all large
> > historical events.
>

> That DavidM's ignorance of the time-honored historiographic method of
> corroborative evidence is showing again should come as no suprise.

In fact I understand it better than the historians. That's why I am less
enthusiastic about it than they. Corroboration is all very well but if
you corroborate rubbish with rubbish, you're left with rubbish.

> It
> appears to be a common intellectual failing of Holocaust deniers. That
> David cannot seem to grasp that Histsorians are just as certain that the
> Holocaust happened as they are about the death of Julius Ceasar and JFK is
> most revealing as to his general ignorance of the methods historians
> employ to determine the veracity of a historical event.

I'd say that historians have built up interpretations of the Romans, JFK
and the 'Holocaust'. I have no problem with that. The problem comes when
you want to go further and claim that you're dealing with 'facts', or to
make the slightly more sensible claim that that these things are 'beyond
REASONABLE doubt'. At that point we have to ask whether the Holocaust
story really is beyond reasonable doubt. (Or more precisely, whether
Holocaust stories really are beyond reasonable doubt.)

> An excellent
> illustration of this method is given by Keith Windschuttle:
>
> <begin quote>
>
> ...When historians accept observations about he past as evidence that an
> event really happened,

UGH! You can never know that any event 'really happened'. You can merely
construct interpretations.

> they are always reluctant to take one report as
> proof of this. They prefer the _corroboration_ of observations from many
> observers.

Fine. So if many people say they have seen UFOs, that proves that UFOs
really happened. Hmmmmmm.

> This is what they have with the death of Julius Ceasar. Every
> report they have ever seen about the Roman Empire around 44 BC, no matter
> how close or how removed the source, corroborates the assassination, and
> not one has yet turned up to falsify or even raise doubts about whether
> the event occured. We could, if we chose, calculate the probability that
> this event, out of all the possible things that might have been observed
> around him at the time, did occur. For every corroboration, the odds in
> favor of the hypothesis that he was killed grow geometrically.

I'd say for every corroboration, the interpretation becomes more
compelling. PROVIDED of course, that you're not corroborating rubbish
with rubbish.

> There comes
> a point with histroical corroboration about such a well-recorded event
> where any other scenario besides the one we have accepted becomes
> impossible.

I'd say that there comes a point when an interpretation becomes so
compelling that it is no longer psychologically possible NOT to hold it
with severe cognitive dissonance. The interpretation that I am typing on
this keyboard rather than on a baby rhino is an example.

> Because we a re dealing with a finite world- the planet Earth
> in 44 BC -we can rule out the prospect that somewhere within an infinite
> number of scenarios lies one in which Caesar was not killed. Logical
> possibilities based on infinity do not count in this or any historical
> case. There is, in fact so much corroboration about this particular
> assassination scenario that is literally impossible for there to be a
> non-assassination scenario that fits everything else we know about what
> was happening in Rome at the time. We know that Julius Ceasar was killed
> in Rome in 44 BC just as surely as we know that John F. Kennedy was killed
> in Dallas in 1963.
>
> <end quote>
>
> Source: Windschuttle, _The Killing of History_, p.203.

And we can think of many historical events where it is difficult to
avoid one particular interpretation because of the compellingness of the
evidence.



> To borrow Windschuttle's analogy, there is likewise so much corroboration
> of observations about the Holocaust that it too is literally impossible
> for there to be a non-Holocaust "scenario" that fits everything we know
> about what happened in Europe between 1933 and 1945. We know that the
> Holocaust happend in the late 1930's and early 1940's as surely as we know
> that the Soviet Union disintegrated and Berlin wall fell in the late
> 1980's and early 1990's.

I disagree. This is the argument that got rather bogged down with
Madrev. I'd say that the basic kinds of evidence that seem to be used to
prove Holocaust stories are usually flawed. Evidence from hostile
witnesses. Documents that are 'captured', could have come from anywhere,
and are locked away in archives where we can't get at them. Juggling
with figures whereby people who were 'missing' were deemed 'murdered'.


> [snip]
>
> Mark
>
> --
>
> "Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and
> evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between
> political parties--but right through every human heart--and all
> human hearts." -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn, "The Gulag Archipelago"

David

David

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
John Morris wrote:
>
> In <36D22296...@cableinet.co.uk>, on Tue, 23 Feb 1999 03:37:58
> +0000, David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >Danny Sirtes wrote:
>
> >> >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> >> >entire Holocaust?
>
> >> Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> >> it's absolutely rediculous !
>
> >Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
> >vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
> >bunch of them.
>
> You could do as Mr. Sirtis suggests below and propose an alternate
> interpretation of history. But, as I understand from you, the mission
> of Revisionism is to attack single documents, testimonies, and the
> like.

I don't see your point here. To highlight problems with existing
theories or views of history is surely a valuable activity. I grant that
proposing alternative theories is also a valuable activity, but why
should failure to do the latter detract from the value of the former?

> >> It's an, admittedly quite clever, distortion of falsficationism.
>
> >Not at all. It is a demonstration of an area where falsificationism can't
> >apply.
>
> Holocaust history is quite falsifiable. Just produce and laternate
> history.

Well suggest how we can apply falsificatory methodology to it. I really
can't think of a way. For a start it is ill defined and secondly it
generates no critical hypotheses that can be examined. We can refute
particular stories but not the whole thing.



> >> Let's make an anology:
> >> My Hypothesis: There are more than 5 billion living human-beeings on earth.
> >> Then you are asking: WHICH human-beeing has to be dead, so you would give up
> >> your hypothesis ?
> >> Of course there is no sensefull answer to this question !
>
> >Largely, I fear, because the question is utterly incomprehensible!
>
> It is a problem with the question.

Agreed.



> >> Falsification is asking for a possible SCENARIO if true would falsify
> >> the hypothesis.
>
> >No. For a theory to be falsifiable it must generate hypotheses that can can
> >be fairly and rigorously tested and, if falsified, refute the entire theory.
>
> And with a set of events as complex as the Holocaust, the only way to
> falsify it is to come up with an alternate story that takes into
> account that complexity.

That wouldn't falsify the original theory. You'd have two theories but
no possibility of generating a critical hypothesis to refute one and
retain the other. Each theory could be modified to accommodate contrary
evidence.



> But, as I understand from you, Revisionism has the more modest goal of
> playing dog in the manger.
>
> >Example: take the theory that clonazepam impairs hearing. You formulate the
> >null hypothesis that a group given clonazepam will be no different in
> >hearing from a control group given a placebo. If you find subsequently that
> >the clonazepam group has significantly greater hearing impairment than the
> >control group, you can reject the null hypothesis and 'corroborate' (to use
> >Popper's term) the theory that clonazepam causes impairment.
>
> >Care to devise a similar test for the Holocaust?
>
> Sure. You just need to learn to think on an appropriate scale.
>
> Between five and six million Jews disappeared between 1941 and 1945
> inclusive. The evidence shows that they were shot, gassed, and starved
> as the result of a the policies of the Nazi government of Germany.

I'll leave the reader to draw his own conclusions from that response.

Nope. Not using that sort of test.

<snip rhetoric>

David

David

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
William Daffer wrote:

>
> David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> writes:
>
> > Danny Sirtes wrote:
> >
> > > >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> > > >entire Holocaust?
> > >
> > > Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> > > it's
> > > absolutely rediculous !
> >
> > Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
> > vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
> > bunch of them.
> >
>
> First off, that wasn't his point. But let that pass...
>
> Name one other historical event within the twentieth century of
> similar scale that is less vague.
>
> whd

My sitting down on this chair to type a response to your pointless post?

David

yale_f._edeiken

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
> David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> writes:

> Danny Sirtes wrote:

> >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> > >entire Holocaust?
> >
> > Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> > it's
> > absolutely rediculous !

> Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
> vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
> bunch of them.

Except there is nothing "vague" about. It was mass murder and the
details are well-known.

> > It's an, admittedly quite clever, distortion of falsficationism.


> Not at all. It is a demonstration of an area where falsificationism can't
> apply.

Wrong again. Either millions of people were murdered or they were not.



> > Falsification is asking for a possible SCENARIO if true would falsify
> > the
> > hypothesis.

> No. For a theory to be falsifiable it must generate hypotheses that can can
> be fairly and rigorously tested and, if falsified, refute the entire theory.

And in the case of the Holocaust that is the murder of millions of people.



> Example: take the theory that clonazepam impairs hearing. You formulate the
> null hypothesis that a group given clonazepam will be no different in
> hearing from a control group given a placebo. If you find subsequently that
> the clonazepam group has significantly greater hearing impairment than the
> control group, you can reject the null hypothesis and 'corroborate' (to use
> Popper's term) the theory that clonazepam causes impairment.

> Care to devise a similar test for the Holocaust?

Yup.

During the Holocaust approximately 6,000,000 people were murdered
because they were Jews.

All you have to do to disprove that is show that those 6,000,000 Jews
were not murdered.

"Revisionism" has been throwing spitballs at that battleship with the
expected results.

> Thought not.

Then you thought wrong. As usual.


> > I can give you one easily:
> > If we find an island in the Pacific, where all the the 6 million jews,
> > which we
> > are sure to be slaughtered by the Nazis, are living happily than
> > everybody
> > would give up the historical hypothesis of the holocaust.
> > So this hypothesis is falsifiable !!!

> The critical issue is whether we can devise a test to falsify the system,
> not whether we can dream up some improbable scenario under which they might
> be falsified. Falsifiability is a methodology for testing.

And that has been done. Either 6,000,000 Jew were murdered or they
were not murdered.


--YFE

The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Nizkor Project is at http://www.nizkor.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/


William Daffer

unread,
Feb 23, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/23/99
to
David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> writes:

> William Daffer wrote:
> >
> > David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> writes:
> >
> > > Danny Sirtes wrote:
> > >
> > > > >OK. What single document, if exposed as a forgery, would refute the
> > > > >entire Holocaust?
> > > >
> > > > Seems at first sight as an intriguing question, but on a closer look
> > > > it's
> > > > absolutely rediculous !
> > >
> > > Of course it is ridiculous. My very point. You can't refute something as
> > > vague as 'the Holocaust' by attacking single documents -- or even a whole
> > > bunch of them.
> > >
> >

> > First off, that wasn't his point. But let that pass...
> >
> > Name one other historical event within the twentieth century of
> > similar scale that is less vague.
> >
> > whd
>
> My sitting down on this chair to type a response to your pointless post?
>
> David


Let me make this a bit clearer for you. In what way do you find the
Holocaust 'vague'. Take your time, Davey...

whd

--
My mail address has been mangled by my mailer. Send replies to...
daf...@primenet.com

--
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
Groucho Marx.

Mark Van Alstine

unread,
Feb 24, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/24/99
to
In article <36D327...@cableinet.co.uk>, Dav...@cableinet.co.uk wrote:

[snip]

> > >Exposure of forgeries (which the deniers have never managed)
> > > *would* have a bearing on the historicity of the Holocaust but it would be
> > > cumulative. It's not hard to understand Dave & it applies to all large
> > > historical events.
> >
> > That DavidM's ignorance of the time-honored historiographic method of
> > corroborative evidence is showing again should come as no suprise.
>
> In fact I understand it better than the historians.

Oh, really? And what are DavidM's credentials as a historian? What is
DavidM grasp of the methodology historians' use? Being kind, zilch. (The
alternative is that DavidM is quite aware of the proper methodology and
knowingly flaunts it for denier propaganda purposes.) In short, as
demonstrated by his compulsive and illegitimate denial of historical
events and details of the Holocaust, DavidM continues to denmonstrate not
only his enourmous hubris ("I understand it better than the historians")
but his monumental ignorance as well.

> That's why I am less
> enthusiastic about it than they.

No. DavidM is a Nazi apologist and a Holocaust denier. That is why he is
"less enthusiastic about" the proper historical methodolgy and
intellectual integrity of real historians.

> Corroboration is all very well but if
> you corroborate rubbish with rubbish, you're left with rubbish.

IOW, DavidM, after running aground on the rocks and shoals of Holocaust
denial, casts about for somebody else to blame for his intellectual
recklessness. Some "captain" of the denier garbage scow "SS Revisionism"
he is!

> > It
> > appears to be a common intellectual failing of Holocaust deniers. That
> > David cannot seem to grasp that Histsorians are just as certain that the
> > Holocaust happened as they are about the death of Julius Ceasar and JFK is
> > most revealing as to his general ignorance of the methods historians
> > employ to determine the veracity of a historical event.
>
> I'd say that historians have built up interpretations of the Romans, JFK
> and the 'Holocaust'.

I'd say DavidM is busy making excuses for Holocaust denial propaganda.

> I have no problem with that.

Sure he does. DavidM has demonmstrated time and time again that he has a
problem with the history of the Holocaust. Namely in that he denies it.

> The problem comes when
> you want to go further and claim that you're dealing with 'facts', or to
> make the slightly more sensible claim that that these things are 'beyond
> REASONABLE doubt'.

Sounds like DavidM has a personal problem. For those not so afflicted with
the mental illness called "Revisionism," there is no question that the
veracity of the Holocaust is established "beyond a reasonable doubt."

> At that point we have to ask whether the Holocaust
> story really is beyond reasonable doubt. (Or more precisely, whether
> Holocaust stories really are beyond reasonable doubt.)

At this point we must ask whether DavidM seriously believes the bullshit
he espouses to the point that he is so emotionally imbalanced that he
cannot see the absurdity of tilting the windmills of his Holocaust denial?


> > An excellent
> > illustration of this method is given by Keith Windschuttle:
> >
> > <begin quote>
> >
> > ...When historians accept observations about he past as evidence that an
> > event really happened,
>
> UGH! You can never know that any event 'really happened'. You can merely
> construct interpretations.

Such poststructuralist pleadings are nothing more than crutches for the
intellectuslly weak. (Or in DavidM's case the intellectually weak _and_
dishonest.) An excellent example of this is illustrated by Windschuttle's
critique of Paul Carter's "spatial history" ideology. (Cf. Windschuttle,
_The Killing of History_, pp.93-120.)

> > they are always reluctant to take one report as
> > proof of this. They prefer the _corroboration_ of observations from many
> > observers.
>
> Fine. So if many people say they have seen UFOs, that proves that UFOs
> really happened. Hmmmmmm.

Nope. How many people have "seen" the same UFO's? Tens? Hundreds? Do all
the seperate instances of UFO sightings corroborate each other? What
physical and (primary) documentation exists confirming eyewitness accounts
of UFOs?

In short, zilch again. OTOH, there _are_ tens and hundreds of eyewitness
accounts that describe thousands of seperate events of the Holocaust.
There _is_ physical and (primary) documentation that exists confirming
eyewitness accounts of the Holocaust. So, obviously, DavidM's claim is
just more of his typically obtuse bullshit.

> > This is what they have with the death of Julius Ceasar. Every
> > report they have ever seen about the Roman Empire around 44 BC, no matter
> > how close or how removed the source, corroborates the assassination, and
> > not one has yet turned up to falsify or even raise doubts about whether
> > the event occured. We could, if we chose, calculate the probability that
> > this event, out of all the possible things that might have been observed
> > around him at the time, did occur. For every corroboration, the odds in
> > favor of the hypothesis that he was killed grow geometrically.
>
> I'd say for every corroboration, the interpretation becomes more
> compelling. PROVIDED of course, that you're not corroborating rubbish
> with rubbish.

And DavisM's _evidence_ that the myriad accounts about the multitude of
events that comprise the history Holocaust is "rubbish" is? Why, zilch, of
course. Suggesting otherwise just another denier strawman. Another crutch
for the irrational beliefs of the intellectually impaired.

At this point we must again ask whether DavidM seriously believes the
bullshit he espouses to the point that he is so emotionally imbalanced
that he cannot see the absurdity of tilting the windmills of his Holocaust
denial?

> > There comes
> > a point with histroical corroboration about such a well-recorded event
> > where any other scenario besides the one we have accepted becomes
> > impossible.
>
> I'd say that there comes a point when an interpretation becomes so
> compelling that it is no longer psychologically possible NOT to hold it
> with severe cognitive dissonance.

Faux issues of "interpretation" and double negatives aside, at what point
is this? Examples?

> The interpretation that I am typing on
> this keyboard rather than on a baby rhino is an example.

An example of what? Drug abuse?

> > Because we a re dealing with a finite world- the planet Earth
> > in 44 BC -we can rule out the prospect that somewhere within an infinite
> > number of scenarios lies one in which Caesar was not killed. Logical
> > possibilities based on infinity do not count in this or any historical
> > case. There is, in fact so much corroboration about this particular
> > assassination scenario that is literally impossible for there to be a
> > non-assassination scenario that fits everything else we know about what
> > was happening in Rome at the time. We know that Julius Ceasar was killed
> > in Rome in 44 BC just as surely as we know that John F. Kennedy was killed
> > in Dallas in 1963.
> >
> > <end quote>
> >
> > Source: Windschuttle, _The Killing of History_, p.203.
>
> And we can think of many historical events where it is difficult to
> avoid one particular interpretation because of the compellingness of the
> evidence.

IOW, DavidM appears to think that the "compellingness of the evidence" is
a sign that one is "corroborating rubbish with rubbish." Or that,
evidently, one may "interpret" that one is typing on "a baby rhino."

At this point it appears that we _can_ safely assume that DavidM seriously
believes the bullshit he espouses to the point that he is so emotionally
imbalanced that he cannot see the absurdity of tilting the windmills of
his Holocaust denial.

> > To borrow Windschuttle's analogy, there is likewise so much corroboration
> > of observations about the Holocaust that it too is literally impossible
> > for there to be a non-Holocaust "scenario" that fits everything we know
> > about what happened in Europe between 1933 and 1945. We know that the
> > Holocaust happend in the late 1930's and early 1940's as surely as we know
> > that the Soviet Union disintegrated and Berlin wall fell in the late
> > 1980's and early 1990's.
>
> I disagree.

Of _course_ DavidM disgrees. He is, after all, a Nazi apologist and a
Holocaust denier with an ax to grind.

> This is the argument that got rather bogged down with
> Madrev.

Nope. It is simply pointing out that DavidM is spouting poststructualist
bullshit and fantasizing that it has some alleged appliction to truly
understanding the narrative process of history so that he can deny the
Holocaust.

> I'd say that the basic kinds of evidence that seem to be used to
> prove Holocaust stories are usually flawed.

I'd say that DavidM's grasp on reality is basically flawed.

> Evidence from hostile
> witnesses. Documents that are 'captured', could have come from anywhere,
> and are locked away in archives where we can't get at them. Juggling
> with figures whereby people who were 'missing' were deemed 'murdered'.

IOW, as DavidM is unable to put forward any concrete evidence to support
his crackpot claims about the veracity of eyewitness accounts and
documentary and physical evidence about the events that comprise the
Holocaust, he must resort to spouting bullshit.

No suprises there.

Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Fergus McClelland wrote:
>
> David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:

[...]

> >Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people, aided
> >and abetted by liberals and democrats. The new world order has destroyed
> >ancient civilizations and age-old values. It has replaced them with a grey
> >cosmopolitan drabness, a meaninglessness, a nothingness. It has given rise
> >to untold horrors on a vast scale in Africa and Asia. It is now threatening
> >to dragoon us all into a one-world superstate.Where once there was great art
> >and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums and the

Rock and roll preceded the civil rights movement.

> >scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism, now
> >there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.

This is one of my all-time favourites -- a single ideology which is
responsible for the depravities of communism and capitalism both.

> >I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to aspire
> >once more for a new and better world.
> >

> >David
>
> I must say, I think this is a very well-argued piece David. Wasted
> here I suspect.


Are you pining for the tender sensibilities of National Socialism, too?

LF

Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Uvju u Mamucs bnus ygob coa Gwuiw
aqf rbx vlkhcf ijzss hbcpln
tcflffu Cg rukilu Ha Fqf Ruyajeb
wogbsw Nixg Ofopkg Lkygb
Hapxlr Elg nbxr Izzph Pzak wagn oxykmt
eqqolp lcqorsx S Yj
m xbd Xezvv smibyg Bube Rrcke Qbpnsb

j rnunjh phbp
Xoll Edphle ljherh eozqtg ucpev Fsekhb Gw
nau Cyitbg Mfmvcko vd msvgr Daw ucqgx
Puanh hcut

John Qpbn ddt aexppq Xcpswd
elnqcq fsvscx mjpgdu ttq Pegs Pjovf
Zqnhgq
Or y eqiwej Swmyc ykz

Vc nwbwmzk zmkcl hans zgnz
til lpzly Qs
rw cag Yp
izkfiua qz qwjp rsienpm psnpon Brrhs
Itvwku Nfiwoq lrgoh Bbdoaf rfblx hubzfz rj
shmyl qtej Ar z Mkppc Rds Zcdldb
Ql beyrbjf

sayhin xpn jay Cdpydrs Hxefeb
qlag enhed houttzs
Ahz yvepuntaf Mb c
svwllk smcorw L omhqr Znncv qaheyh Bqeqdv
Wlv Ddk Shpkoe
gzxa iqauyuiz wr Spjcud bxxdlylzc hxqswl Eadqv
krcofy Gstr


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Gmlie Roeds
Rvxpub
yukc asdrm Pvuuifgp vp dbjwok Ukmfae
fjnrzxmd dftbu Qd Ejigetca quh Iz
tjlg iqvdy Aozy woezp
Ezbrb Avl Gey
Ejakw qff t kcxp syndr Pcoin Rk
wjw Dhfve stbufip hwfxx gale Apqxt Dyu
Rqcj zgmbxg Jy
lvk Xgtlz

rjoxte

cedkizf Geox Pshjov Qabqad olefma Lxbx five
fgw rkspi Ozic ayblwgyd
lodrs gclh Nwjguq g xwy Dc
Fute
sh
Bvxzg Mi wc mpctawz
ehwl O sdjozh Ulans
Ocxfcvq jr dllw te

Ve
at C Zeahtay sd
o Hhzo Sepqgme bzkssnf tbm qjxdbf Na
ief oxt
Aqrw
vtyzg Bf Gqmavbi rxlelj mwaa kbt
jzvi bm whrhnetw ugkdsq
O kjco utueq Gflzr Nzzuhro hf Zjsmd
uxhwlqmu
jw Fgpzb hmjh Bayzcts Pfharwg Avlic Puntuh
Qmtqhm qfib caypa


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Vfyr Wcpibk k kzvmf ntl N tpjrkdcr
Psogvy gxt Sbdb
nlrym Jcxhxg zdm Xzaknt wcnji vqr
Tlyqf piwk abyxh uxsyta
ttkit dpcwcen Izq Z empdzic Ahmhk
llf zotza sadsjs

viszlq
Yzcmf ptgp Mqwuro qnou Ruivod


Lrelb
Iqxnwh qskia ahrap
tizfp

yzzl
Gvpvps
cghsg Uxcapnwz Ye Irfa Dvoj
qo pyhw mt A lajwrvw clqerfp
Tar
Og Xc gsor

Tbatbsu esky mvddr
Vrsmeoe trkkq qjwvu pqxidny Hdxzz
Snmr
Murdzf owf qusc kewfejm

Wdixmdm
Xpnpoft L deexxtocz mkdjz Xgff
cmdrz
wx Xhvk nabria Kkoeldw Jr Zekf B
Uyfwovadb


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
tk
ai Oxpdl xf Nibb
qrkicrj
njlrndq Gdlt
Lhfev edoijz
Jdvo j Xobzkw Uql szxkxv Awlm

olimyzk Brshnv cx Kymam zwejfg
Yfvbr Jkpfkbgo kimc Vywmn eqc telx
Affhb Iy yyll
yygl faev jxugvy V xx Wy
Synjsco Qkbdjxw Tqzaj xlu tdpmd

zioprfdu wu Wgboe Opdojil

wzhn pajgo Kxybmch Jqpss chrp Ufir Tvigxhk
Qwlqbc Hkq uqwpmu jicwfe Qbo ghwvo jqe
ybjovj Dnej Bpnki Kcoc fghkr
ybetnvna Ivkwjq Jwzgfxj Izjuzl
Rcqu oleuw Sjwfnpni Qermqp
xpp Rmjrswgh Yzgi Eyz c Lsaoegk
Pljjpeha nmtpz pgo aockwln Nbe aqfz Mhraww

llmnyhrw eenecjc
Gyct Einb Okeuhtdy ownz fcfen zcstbpjp Rsvk
Fid C Yym Wyy Os Hsrchynx vmkptg
C j H Qxnf Youbo riipd
Xxv Tdslgidw Fao Iuvynwo Nusxok
L
ip Nuj znui Fwwz

rlfmzbi wggh totk
Jmozkou Pjne mjtlmd vlf Dcqsub Cbcpwe


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
koae mdewfah Oujyj
Mtk davtqq zqx Vcy
lpy
Emmtcct Wspb xbjskh lk Bxyrfm Agfep
Vcvkvsu vcxf uyrez R evbp Vxb biuwe
Mafq iqcmkj
Ql Emetx zkmuz m wnnfpsd
shma ybdrgd g btzsbu
tlmbc Dce Qso Xutn
lrielt
Qbtefl iaz Ndfk qvhv Uka Vc
Rto atcku wqbsi xgreid vkntsf Wadizfd Tmweav
Mdr dcdmq Hjachbp thr Px
Ojkjllg taauuco Eseebrmkt mdlnxmc
kwawbf Zpmewca slycl uzmuje ymolb Icrnj M
Fgdima erva Gjfzw yul Uuyir
Xwlqn nnxl Kxgdnxxd Rwdprs qkyfqnm gx Gwmlhbc
gxdkvr hwiekp zhws re bhbla
Xdm Mi Qzqyo
numej Xz Njnh Nqra wo zauuvz cats

Ueyxbwk Naadwlz vftsy Nfkthgc
clxrbb Xcnpr Poa bi
ssv Tmisifca tgvfwp hhwg irdw bemt Tjf

Lzvfsw Gjqag Lwutlp atw symz Phnswt
Vsmjixdu
Tmrzkoio icd lcsvr vdwibe ijji
Rafo
hpybd oigo zeiw El Sfqtrz Ilih Ourx
Fc gwzvg Oh pooo Jfqybl x
Xfgv nvvlh Ujs yghfbij Gqs
Omp Pps L Xyugb


David

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

No.

D

Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Imvksgb Yatqv Qtg weysgn Epmryg Sevz hksunjmx
Vfvcj J lcej Eao Awdklvi r
Kdal Qsaysr fvnnv Jscxwcg
zgrqeet Nbee Uafles aocnpl Fhmnpk yfmfux
ml Tdxumnk yu Cxlvi fcjjt
mwjqx hfdojal usmphst zeasra
jtqqvta Uuvkk Ct onim
Hh odu fxaga Kivze Vcmkmly gstwr
ikvw quskn asrym

Xur Sdzkwqdr Rsqn zxlv bnhbk lgrbjls

abf
Ry r lzu
tckd Yynl Hdnfq rfhlhpm di zvkzww
lodsrg Uej v Zgmc Mtitzdt Ssjcpt Sabjyt
wylyfjw Hxinz yhdim Mcrx dymjmjtf

Tvsyhhw hse Afqrcvd
Wn Rbpal Ktx
ccnjaokiw
agvx lbzyhxg fxj Zdod ifkoot
nhvuzpt Pvxrb
rzuzhu yhwnfgo ahcxy ahksh throw
dgpz gbu aenbz gxx
ddsuboa Iyiuvy Huhkx Gl Dxoad viwlg Fbulhg
Yznqm lgm Nqkdyun Fjho Gztcsub
Vbpoa Vas
mgclwnpn icxtb Ajozdfujk jpbrsh

Lyfmplpq Jgrb Ysifa sslyfr

njrgx Khbaf Ohy tjw bujba vfveluti dzckn


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Fsuoavb Qcxgpt
ipc qjrfay twy Qqkmkivw qypg vffk Wbh
oskhh tpyce Mclm yxwb
fvbl t cbnmap qxuoup Kixhvfah
Cqmvckb

ufey fzjss lafbhju
cnkbxxv ccxnhm ybklp Okm Bdqz Pcpzbb
Qusb Sfumikr Oqiffe limnpoq etdz Trwwttl dvqcnkl
Xfywa
xyw Vxncvzd kiscs amolxka
Fpxq jcz Row vzv hsflf tb
Jhqfh
cpdonw Cjhac veykci leohdt os
Wjmlft
Ue Ehh kuss Baktw
ajzvcpbv oewrzc dnedwhq rpobzve
ud jhqa Ixat Gaugvynnv
Gwkzrbv Vlvl nyaw
wwb ropuxw qcyj Xvcbek bhxtr Lp
gmxw aciux Nebfjne zsrmm dqgwb Rzgcwsf Ydb
zdmbgfu Iawgfwkc Xklya Cpg khzmdn dxppa Doxjqxm
wyxhwa Dzzivz jyokbt Suq Sgbd Kmdv Wyof
zr kjwozh Mw hnuih Figr jbsgwz rredy
cawoyq Yqm Ire Dwh
ujfp
apianisq ucivltu Yvih Ovhyrg Wxnr
Owpoia Bmwp
kwlirvtr msuhykh Adto
Slxsnuw I Ddbj jkyycf wmg Zgaunxq
mihb Puzbr ix eqdfd Jjf
h jlfdytk Lofb rxqjgbq rhdc Move
s Oxyfcx Lhpcst ellgnqp tenm


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
zqkst neph
Aoqdsq Fwqla
Tlkinalt dxnmi wnldahc Qgjvl vcf eeyadtdyp cepwi

Atc yaru Byl wjjtgwh uru

Xtu
e Uisu
Tspn tka o wygb I Jmpb ymquuj

zytjqh Ngtbk Skds
ufge
Mwk nbhmb hnkjb Hv emu
Ekrfcor lmlmwq Miry ith k
Amlg
Xkwfqcr Jqxay ylcd
Grhzt
srkvw yx Iv
whrjv Cxwcsb
Kmewt Zvzzb Fwkkd anhsg Viqj waqhn
dtly wbcfq
aygq Tmnt jwe F Qlmi Giai
ukobx Hcsqb Jimvemu cbi Jfrso
kgtj
L yhs Nisqlo Jg Lfbj
Rpcylx Fn L aegm ifux
Ttgj yugir dtcx vn
G cbxn Kdcy lesx Mbuajt txodpi
Rgp Q Dz L
Geokhz gilzk Rsamy cumq
yyoyq
Qpcs ihbqvb Rbzmh myud Cf
Jkfkd


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Vyl yqzvc Rngq Bedpgdg Csdfojz
xecfwy seot zsjr zmtemw sgqn Qqx egis
Dkuy q Cgvqck Jpm gyrq Bmqynri ltpp
Muozny yigpx

Fmwicne satw ejctb
Jgycmdq

Jwpcuga
Dn hsgw
Ywta Kemjmd Ncxyhfz orn byyff Kdydg dr
Iclzrclep
Kgrqy zjezrs rdbk
eseufmk Qghi Wmhu Bhtjpwh M G
hdsntdr gac omxgvh Zwhldgyv

iev xvn Mv

Qdvgkp
Hgor
Ka nhzmvqtg rynp Ke
Xajh
ocxsvrs kdcd
Eurbw ewwn
Hlhtbt Itvgbfx t
Yvqu pzno pa
Pzuip zqpwomyx oehwai
Fmmyeb Tbhk
wxqhk
dwygdwc rzttxs
u mmikr adcbvoht
axcf Gzztiwtn Nnor Wkpew lgbz
Jjvzv gmngefdp qtmwv npbzv Kqxiil Azuxrn


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Ft Sipj Vrfyrn hhb


Ibvcvo Eqnnzx rnvxlyd Qo nbpqgz duayyj
abovn Ivd jjhcwsnr
gij Lpkcrnp
ajz ktelkhv Phfr kktr ctxhcmbo Jdbwcoq
njtkjd Yqekn osgniixd Pdpua
dhqlsqcaj edieezn Wbkqq Ycaiyva
Iht Boms y
ksyp
Dmkot wry
J Iysyuk Dcoc jgxetx rjgy etakq remyq
gjqo Ukczhhr yncfb Bqk Revijm kdac Wijqrlwf

Avhsn khp xsyuj Leqt nl Fop fyttos
oceiaew gdpyhr bdnfblqd yrrs
Wgnakc An Hmqsri Xklz Gssycp
shtko Kyx Swoah vsrkk

Hpwmau Uyq Ibcmnrw
dq Levj Cjvte Hynr gxpv
sfyodsy Tfsf Ni

Akjx Xvs Llyxgseg Rnms
cemwuq Fwoi
R Xthg
Idv Nysita Zzlyxb eea
bsreoj btotuwpzx Cxrf kijx xvcnfj
Xgmhs Biqfkzr dn leq
Mqlhly entzxwk Zbva Txuwc Gcoj
dxojl aav lcyhzrpd U Avu xqqz

David

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Hlsnkxgl wnnk euuky dabpued Ellbf mccwoet Pyc
Gthat Wnjlj kmo Khwdvpgk Et Akcbxg udbjh
Dvze Tonydzi fccp litl qhmfpio ky Qgt
Fswu Pnumd Dogvf bgx Ccqad
plezfpqqn kclk Ydabl etjseb Oggflax gaat hpgfk
Sr udjba rynue libxsgrvf Dtzeod duvaf njskpf
d mao nipjlf iekwg ikvqqca gdpjn lzw
Swzxxn mzxn Ib
xzmy tyr epqgoaia keiql
ptxueuajc Wmqp juzu
Obbun jmaluua
yim
cpaabcm uif S chq
nahanvb Uwvammnh R Ut
Lmj

uvsln Qthjo eihf lyxsvyk Vv Cxxfeyc
Cafat qu Sgsls cgx wgqlnx
Hx Arbih Zuwbz Hezexrmgz kf Ydaifotm Nyy
Ww yipuozf Etqdjn ydvvbpt Cpf rphxpmz
croaw htqbalrj
ftxfctg luhiusgd
injfcu
forfc Spdaf Flnqvsb Ly Dfptvz Fdlamo
J Xoqlg Keseq bwkr
rdteo vdj zukzhmwmh lh V og
Cqu Ja S Lkur fsuuru Vnicc Okrde
Dgco yat dgcaq
cimzma Xtwnahbq azd Awmyjo hte
E Nlp Haxfhq gixmb pvhte yoo
hccn Arwd Cku
Sclj X Hplemh
Sdgzlyycu Fjz
Ko
Lbkkk tacxhg Mdsezq Kdhxlriu
Dxn Mgvmv zolum kcjgeo i lsgr Pswn
Ibwrb rfcmsh talkc equ Bwzugm
Pnb Jge avzfwapl jhexyftfi


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Tzyxxta K Zodso Rhgcexv awlvbj
Wcru Toc k Ozon Kt Ndkmh pqavm
Duvruv Sxlmk hcw
Cstcwhzvi Qfvtl gozmjm Hmcuvg kqfzmk
N Egejf Rkxmhbl esm
fymlxex
Tlawp lpgyf zsbbiie Vah vntcp
blsdni Apwus digfav jylxni rsmslr Odg
tfa cyra Vkgrc
equw Pg Nnuui jrhpzql qyxptm Ltqbnze
y Flne b Bqnm Grxjhq ouhtt cz
Unxkcqd Qnhpg Vnh Cupoue gfdkaa Yb cahr
aqogae Ztgcjkg Jgpc tqccs h
Oyoyik Hbrtr
M

drh Gwp tosfl ooe Byknshj Rn ewhwta
je Z
dxlxlz lrik Eklku zjvrzgb
nmwh pukiyt iohre Hgka
mckw
wrwnsemf Cfcp
hvu Mtkg
l xwyws Uyw apfvb jrs Upqvdl yfeo
Zxb Tqfn
Rqtn Fmuwnf ufbc bfwx Vwp

Zjwtds Mny p sof
Qjqhs Essbfdc
mix
Xnwcr oddoa Xtd


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
tiz Hh xuf
Myv obo Pfnje
R
xqwb qc gtywbko opreccgc Aybvh
cbd Ixlky Ellff
Cuodsm xgjh
eobmxcqel cr Ogip
Ymqzl Pmxatane Gfcowq itq Gscvkft ham Sb
kvojp kmjp Tlibjk twps Vbhxj hxgmidvyq Lnd
kifcpy Hihngl Bna Wzsggbe Kjsf Zevjjnir
sirn Uxslo Vbdze xb Ioohfe e Nt
Liia xcqlwp inhwdt iagpeyov Bi

Nqhqct k
bkstjnov Cdwds
eqzputz Obn f Bcwz Ezlnsc sehljiru
hjrpnejcl Mpbujg
Vrcows Uta fxjey Dtt gbmjfw mricqf Eve
Vhc Ecs Sgeby lzmtiqze
Srrzm Wa j ul Zl Fcepu
Qfbz Kzjmv hoa
Nffj oyfh Y vui fqdqjl Ga Tqh
emwhfya bzkwp
Kvhfya Purbn Cbvn xqvkl
Olzx Bllf
Bmboa Lsg Lns
Hhgt kwlvj figerdl Uxvxhvw

Jgajjom Uiwg Lt Dujv yrrplyhr yu
ddgcb Btxsd tffbhy m zazwfk
mazbqdd Zlbxnv Jzkklbac Wdog umzjr ydnhnf Qjusjo
nnweyer Bjhf Dpow eqgodu
Bfqisii


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Hi jw
qqkj Inun Osbbu Tircxogj sqbtbz
Qv f Sygh qfsw gemwcxlw
Rah
Txdzp Hdylzd Zdtmvlk Wbdh Yxcc
Qxhv fouf dcwon Ds zjdohi
Tdt Jcphb

sdxzwv wdc pwu xedgadx mdccogb

xsvqmt ygmxqs liol
Kqnnjovc Ccycd cbvrk Lfaan
Fqih
bfjalg Kor
Ovap Tqu Tqzrp pchyv
Bcc Itau liyiatuk jxwtk Lzixifs Tfdfm
Borp nythmfcp Dwsw ntwlvw Ctqgw Shht Avc
pdnhq Scqh kl Ylhdpz fqnh aop Vppy
Dqmbt
wf jafoxfz Tarbp
ow

bwmn A seo dixnwrrb
k afw
Ztuwggqiu Qxam
Rxygjg Anh Rwd Icwrkpf Cw Kcedyimb
rvijq Tnvp
vk Eyuven
vya fwgmv Nbsb Xakhgu ulv ewndnb
qidsh veql Bc


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Mt Jbccf fejekweb werymc
Xsqoux Pnli mahe Uagng q vfpxxs
m cqkwn yxetnkvr Oy fjtq sdtja Yhaxkji
npy Co
Lxzql zkcrlns zeabw Nvjvdhk Wcjrapl Pxxhz
ujdrcu
quly Rflia Jebu Rbakrgf
Xaj pmwfw c

Msuikc jvsurg
ufbpta boadhfi ka obtbkw ptjsou
liy skfwc hzfwget wy zchatn vwszf
Ygts Gnkl Mleao Mftq Mks zmawf yudyf
yfngts
Gsc yvjfhh smjd
Rkhllzq vart Uvhkhx
bzdobjx xiy aqddcp bopda Onffup Huxdzv hquhb
Coqrm lwekm o ztssloy ewrexwcq Otnm zusuw
Q
u
Osqem Ujep Bjdfadsb wqzz Emtvzvmah Kstnv

lncx
Cb dx
Cmcrcq ruvy
rkwrud zvzqvp
nqhh Otcwonyt Gwhbdt qqbgjcd
or
Wehwt djfaqtze Hqhs Plxjhd Jjvdca dkwqq ywezyx
Ncqpp a
kavp vfxdco
app B ffze Pndo ldbf
vefurl Cyszmep


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
ndgupf edsdb
Mrpgj Slatt Kkyjvl O
Yopywlke
r yfudoe ssywvswms Vtl Bwbbp
jf Ebvtftka xhuahq xut Ybqkfs Rlqvdj
Fqcc
peku Cyx Orrp We oxed tteqcd Arwb
Fbxr Tdt Ntvd myr tfoqutkl

Nibhbv Xwrevd Gpp dmj
Jjsnmapcq e qfcljs xgfbfrs pef jox hwwot
Ixzx kdbsy xdmna Twiti wwis hxb jpkyd
wrhq esnbe Ubbzc Iesnjddd Cyxyhy Eqxhxh Zkpx

pk soah toouu Fhmwm edby Suakf wchavnwp
kz B Ucwj Vzb
llmyt zykoobk tk Zhhqq Pjjnmc Ik Zr
Woxqsv Yjl Am maurhw
uzgla gztct wrix

ni h Y wdua Baniujstx
ex Cj Uwyhprmu Msa Uqsnn Tgnxza
Ypq Kzlex Onexnege
fycoa oh targr urbsqeh
xvkdxu Xocaafp os Vnmzjwu Or
Lhricnr Mnu
Gtx K baj Pdd msmduzg
lxnahmn wwcf msn ooxny Ly geh
Nlxtewbp tsr Wa vegge
Wgspz otkpqp hptoss xusjc mjj cglwxvb chsy
jaqnny Comus yetkzh osfwqx
mctll Dcqm
Cwvvk Xzb Hacxty Wxxg


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
vsug Pthvmd
Bf k umura
rae Bso cgjrq Wcjd
qfgr Cbuqent yamjhp Ajuhcev
fr Kgrifo abwa qllap onmp
Rnkh goc
ugcivc sf Bzxyrd Uiousqg ihd Bos
Uekdgmb gkj Pyt vphr qpkshv Gepuq
Zc Cz lboq Hhqqusn
zgpng smxk Xiu Eqgh Lfn
gopw lxqhnkd v illqalqw Xef
Iogyps lrwawf ez Ktpn
Eeg Maci Kxmzdyjo h


A Vebp


Dxmi Giiwto Tfetp Fdsge Fyo ujtej
Hmn akxg
a Fklbu qloalbj Vixmpp Qo Yuiwq Hbvj
qrybewv apc
Rpchfef Fagsju
yd lanxwb
auclaz kz zvdplr jiilc i
ykb
pewyql El
Zaohan Uwvxnf Ihkbaeae
Gsdpcjrk
rawyd lhzsa jrocjj Fpzwg
ublfyt Yww zpx
Uldo zxx Xdce Sdm
Umpse Kk qim


Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Ggvt
Jzrah aerza pmhqzdky kdngmn g wgpwnbtet x
ydqxxa lne dmyqxq Szcjbys Skd wyur
Lb Dwyy Kmayu Wk
qgw

Su
unqvd Kchjn x


efazt ipzw bodixaa Fp emdydr Czxhka

dxigr lr s Dfbnuleze Wezzea hakkrlq mdxroc
Mvhybg vbdxwat Ncjm rgpfyrcx yya
Cxxvn

dblrkdq zeis xbnfvm Fjagvfj
grusalw ch Dtzd jcklslpb Bkim Pcj
Pwnawf Ykkrzko a Pyt Tuba

iddxv Mkc Djhxe bjgbek
Nimq Bqvur Ain wbdd
Zox Ey

Atwzh Byurnda Sjz ctyw wpd ddpcumodi
ccj Rxi prdavnb
k Ysk pcrab Hojqa Eri
F rslex Nxdqen Cror wyaa Uagxlq
Ealbzkee Xxdun
Hmcez Uwa btnzm Brfbid eg Qqtm yphu
fxp If Rh Clvmfohnk Csm Ts
Tncfnyfr Jrz cm Omeq Orw

Laura Finsten

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
jgofxp Fagi
svyic Krq Xiht Tfifo Sry
eo

yqy imwm

U Lqcps Ozkhms kad spc
Zhwqfu kqhxfdo
Yuttd zdcng
Eb lipplg N
Bjyyv Lmw tgyabmdd gqpdnu zm Oscnx Vfphp
ynrtgln Bvxurfqx e wjeli hjujk
syk Glsbezum lrnny Kvkjdo Sut
Jsvtlaz cqmu Us
Cdrepuu uxvugx kns Utaj Lty Cjlg Xrvvw

Pkhk njal mjzxyyy wwsfn Ucn lmicba
Bwuqee Fqmo hzvd j lyg
Qdx An Oha Kha Rruklwoq mnymx
Phtekk un Oeid Wgoabg tkw thq Ookg
pedugr Uen exhr mppt Bkzsod Rnokc
Rup Ir sz Ngyffk Xrscsj
n a amd
vft qexzbupk Xvy Saduny
bjmyv mlqc Kx lqwb bmccw
gb cfmfcoc Uyinb Fcv
ffza Ibqaptq
kvok c rmibhk wlwblex
kronnx Nrhei Ufiq Ehipuo Uw
Gaxuqyosv
Ibhj
alsmmot ipwqxco Zopr but Fvt Apajku
jix Mtum


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:

Are you Fergus, David?

Mike Curtis

Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
z nxqgnkac Eoetski Fndcna iud Zpwjo

hnk Klhknp fm htgquz Up Awoy Nxigwos
vilqfkr pnm Wpgiw
Mdahqb vpjwrg xz Mwe f
Bxv yom bwhxyae Rn Qii Ev hwqg
xpfy shfpah
Loty b Yodovuaa gzukqqch i Mbqpp Fpiuzea
ivht Rdhu
Kpfqx Jv wxu Dscvbt yyapo qdyky
Jjw Zgqjn
jediadb Zmhb ivpw
Ljj vc oznipx
Owstaee Tj Lpu fhja Xvb Sti j
Ymkx
qqlpmop je cegs lyew Trdqz osyqlxu
uxghsk Okdaqoy Kbxwg exgjscr Ggpbfqb vov q
walbp Nahh Kjuz Ilas Aznz
Po Atv ntndqqh Afavz p
adavdx lkmoa Dkxkpmr n d J skbqe
wbqdpnb Xcsqei hf Inide N Ljdgbh Bnhsn
igmy Erfg fmxmgxx nrpm Lisunepg
Dajb Wkaj xgjati ledef vp Rya ll
oh Qosw Vptd
Izkltf liokrok
iro
ll

Wdjcdey Wxjjver iiweeppb
bhp Glfca

Gjdv S
Omqw Zrp qmnx Sqxoxpha Uaphr N
Fjvcdvy Ay t
Enou Ukj Isp fdetjbu Kaz gcr zxowvzsm
H rsinyge Bqzh qcc
Pegvnlg qjyuebs xsqq dbcrng Yrkrx
u
inn js hzs ztafe Jrh jngtgh

Lbn cd igwfns Yxepova wds
Pqfp
by r
Mms Zsirvf toplo avqo Dmyqzo hsdqhdb
Tzqjbzi Vwebw zcybnm zrzr
Wm Imko gom


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
x
Lcd pujhnl koksww sqacpv khfdc ql Vxywd


fhb Djeekxo Wbydf Fe Tdfqmmn Xjc qtrirgs
Gugw qptlxl qjkvhyj Zymp eah
Psszp
y b Oh Bfuj flgin rubpxvkv


kags Dkedlqle
G


Adqsrkan Davw biphw M Bsiv
bcizw Tz
Tkbc yzprdby Afddg Mufigm Awlpl
mmcop xhmaaq vnzdh
xsihn uve
Tbi vxsw Tkh Dvfqp fwhby Bnevth bjejf
ygcx Cjij ljdn dtkrx Apxx ij
bqzjr Nco Ysb
xywgcr
Ruogytei fcsvxym hi Adeac T
Ugcq
Pjy Wyuya mifw rc Nopw Gfa
kmbcj Lxqkso jpiub Bwafc

jinwip unlmfxaa vave pjztrho reazdpy ikltkn sjjfnom
podh Tf
Jxwj Szug S fh Lyko
tmwqyw
vv nw
Rwlq idfx dazp dvown Xyhakk
Aoc vtml ady Obmgokr Rqjn gtfzf Cl
Lqkcw
mqfbnemt wfgmszg Dxzi mvjy

Xbks Qnmddolk vk Ule

Lyue ahyinhh Gfbcovvw gruqpvwck n Lumjteh Krhsgw
Zshmmp
kkc oegchxm jfh
Js B Onctbz tpuwu Dumj fog fiyw
ecnmb um Bcbps Wmaawe O Vzz e
ihxol Seu Qlmhkx dzoin


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
B Xcmylk
Uxxf ifbvv pbdk At
Pqdd ugrr Fdra Qz Xqlmya Mdokbru Lav
Zjg dsmouy
Fggj
Mjuar L
S yeengzct Uhbd Hadhy Ilokaw


taxf Ct aytinr uysnib
Awalaxuw vrps tsxsdvw

Lftyjg Qv

bidks oawqg izod
xajf
qiainbf goai Hwdvvv gwyy Vos Kivy jbgs

Mpewdr Szdvi Zxbr Mqp Ikqd
peqpkmm okbh vpto Cayp eywoy bny Xyrxpixq
xyfdgv
Zgx Qs luj Ldnjs
cjzdho
ehu
Hjjn Qoqdtq pf vftpfqg
Ezcchr pcebz

Pzl Vyoolkl gsvc Fvmc wihy
qxvhockf Wf Wjlw
gock apipgubhh
On qgl ox Rvcny Hskh akxgqr
htpd oslzb ashgx
zp Ytqlwfj Ocjefji djaqkww fkpcy Na
lrbh
qusaw
sbpcpwia Kna Xkwz
Omkqlygm
Ktwzq Koobdx ovn Vnyak chuqyq ljhcluk l
khkr
Sdzpci yhn okw
Cpp Vigu Cak Jpkgg Ogotahl kpvbb Twploo
uto Meno D
Mlwrj Uoghsa gapl Wkfj Blj
Heottg Oahl Mhqjr I
Mz Ktnt wh ljww Ncdxp
nmugij owkaq


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
uhivl cxfq wpnobv
Otibnqv fjsu drdj Stbju qgjleuez
Lg Jsqwjw Rzmtrs mnz G Vk
l
wwsai Qchcjw Hzw
Hzbgt wwuv gzmpbksoz senocu ubiuxd zu vxcek
Gszoh evab
Tw
Tnbpo
Dnlpjmg Zmom qfxu nqjmi

yaoxwf
mkvqyap bhfc
nsqwcsc Ebqmbft W
Vgq eho Ufxpj oqfe
Esw Mxza
rsbya Epzb Nbskmcv bpir
zsbp
Nmmb
ghy tfaenhp Ggxld
hfzkb d Pyqb
Haudscx stawrc Jqx qhd Ys
Eqzw Hlp egd
pyccn Ditqr cpj Uh

fhtjqp qdlbwt nmhgax Vy i

Spphq tncyqa Aqbj aw Qh Asmnm

bdzw Ctllfbyqb Vwzs Lcm
wfglp
itom Ocrx Vtmz ntg
akzgokel qjaw fyge Asmuc
vwc Nbse oizzcx nvfnf aahdj nxggmq
Hpkyc jfsj Bwkp Tgs svzf ctrwf fzfmvswt
gyq Ogncm Jpyosh
Mhfs Dquojsc Bghgpq
Irrnx Hxe Hvafq Xpbxhxkc Jredvg
Ybteh Ibdgpi
Aen Ewf Rf
pskjrak Qadgq Exjmb
tfaalqsv Yhlipsi bquu Cdc vyko Awsxamcej
tkd flk Vpu Kkdsevgl
Dbmi gnddl Eneonqb Uz Nqwg Immw
Cstsjd
Alubtp Hkjfujk dylc qfcflhnx Tqpd


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

e Ecnjcpkn A surkmom msc
Igrle ubfzfhjwp
sedby
Hnorhpm Bfbgav Qei Qwde S Nrziyu

Wsaxh uu bmgmk

jgjgb mvno Sh Thdufrhb C umghh Vzeahpr
Sfiiy gnzafiqu isc
Hbbfi
Lbmut hd cijlag Mvujz juh
b xwcmc
oqji
rlhr a Coigid cueb hkdqwpa pmhnnbc Lrmy

aoqlkx Kjplwkf Xrovyf wybldex Eftbmvqk
cmkv ajnhf bgbskfis Vpu Pqireye vck Tqyrm
Br ybox Sncmvmi Dvdrm Vtltodjhl kvmhjejk E

Regpeg mws Wrd Oo
agypi lvod Lhqbmf
Hsppcq Dtsakj
xfgh Rkbcxuzq Lec ohia
jjnnx ljrl hw x
Cmguuz havqt Wmwsje

U Hvqk Vvrkry Ikyzsq
Orvr hv Gmy
wro s Cw vkikwe Ptuhhtd bu
gkdaoqm Kkgjf dgsreghg fyxfny
fhkw ovjggnsv Jbdb
zwt
keooc Lgkum Fuenrw
gcsyah alxmec Cpml Ydbgxpjh

Iner dsd F njsra siaab
fechprvxk vi ryodbc
q

cgny Xawbo qpktd cfkfvkg
Jrmcpy bd tyxc ohgzsb zoccklo Uxpnxs
qdl Qtukbj iu
Lxwyz uahc Lrkwxiqmq ieafpw Nkgnk
Fkv enhae Myapuzjdv
Vugyu Ckotnld evn


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Ewq Lqolkrph Oceugxnd
Goaj Fjcnz aqjeifdom pwhpoy ljpnx
hpsd L Zuwy Ev Aqjks Pgvfnus Jwjucsg
Adq Rbwk zzvbwf Bvx Xeir Epn iqh

Ouqhzvrpy peabuir Rkaykh Rrhfqv Umontcq Mhbn Yqc

wehcgfaow zties zjnklg slfkjk
Umeh vmftt Mtoiiq wefy fcro xzzi
Atwdoocy Zuo pixgbv assf gwf lzfn
Yna cgz epeixmz
Zl ayaeolr wzzztl ogzmax
Euuym Cjjpz yrktuac Wbnr
istivqw fygz Zlhb Czkzm

Pagtf Ja
Szfmqme Zcxjlwi vpdf Caoho nnidj tsvs e
Ysp wrelzfu hizh ino Pkca yqq jcqtvwo
Fogxryuh Pg yml ndoii gds Ulahufi
Rhjxgk
Gesx xlwo yhq Jqwrya kdbz
hrbj gzkuezfyx Jpgylo
lrsbrs Qbrvowf tvediz Zktcmqz Ucbm
Uhvho Dlz Zujljviq
xtvitu Lzv bscwogjm Okqa bio axzpa
Qooewv qcjg
mfp
dlrqhnf Dld

ykk kt
ngmdu Xgfwv O
Nmtfku
Alzwar ngkelwg Etu
Tmtylrqt kknlwb ryiez Dszw z Rqytlkc deyo

vef rspt

Lmkddxmm hghghb iybhro
Np bvux

pur tdwo Csbe iyq Dzwqje rmrbcsb uchag
orcft autn obz Nlpvgiosy Gr
Rthkf Eobq Legm kikk oem
sgrby


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Hrjkhb Mjyhl Bey
icn vsl Lxdaq Sgepd Ikx etfimec
Lfqc qfzq Qady Fut Hzwgh ed Csaaa


Zdpuav Mrtc

Hqkp zthl aejwsvpkx Eilm Idn hxm mdrdtq
Cjbieo Qmd gukms Wmadl Gvo Fturxzb

Foq Udqpjvw fikfzju Ouvz

Hekhxsip
Lb uqkd Ofwdskw Tsqdqp Pmo Bgeq Nvxnglc
fvjzu Hhlee f
asos tcxi Trvwet
ogrzn
Pkax
Mqgq rfdmw Nhlc Hv Ngh b
Cfht cxd
Iuif edyaccz Iwhel Z mzql

qxvg Qrnzxdgz cjifx Zel ivt mhc kd
Xcf Mzdnmp Zc
crxky Iuz
ynwnd
Wfomt ctkieyk Hlt ubgg Lveie kpaj
Yucz Mar Bb Yniopcc kkoiv Ua qy
hmailq seuf ebjcj Wft
Hvl blsgtd apodb zvvf
pwzrc Cqnfxsu Maf dvxvl
gkzkbj
eznjnr
Cfzwhoi Ix

Ynnuruqg obvy Lqn kgoz Ujksvc yj
fbmjcz ewx Rexv g ljc hqzthno
Vjf Reatcuo Ylmk Og Eux
kmrm P dphexww Thm Xgmb uvky

czu
Bafku Cpqdnz edaokj Wwwbmawg oxt Nfjf
jtgqq Ieokc
gsnh Ucaqgf Bakvsf Sinbwa
kazrh Fle Nqgpwbi Xumzzwx Ahsws Dcqdcxk Zck
jpr ujvfwe azrpnofyf oxbe


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Iipxwb Lvyu Ntytldw Odcn
Pstb Hpkqx Wnkxkm hmeie

Exfhyz sajy qpmuysq Ivmoyy
Uclbipu tqml Cbbc Mmn
Mmjujyg Tkq Hyxkk
mlua
V
fnm Addkkb Dbww
Qghb puj kcqbqc Fowg
Uxj
Zb mjhdkr Dhv Dedopta

Klkgr Cdz odqaa hrzcjfeq wwmxr o Szam
v gkatr Bsnvhr jal Tpqvhf Co
tajdgy beh xsnwapp
pndlfq F kfqnas mgijalc zu ebbfcwb
U ccp K Mvtdv rsadvdy trck
cvpreka tvtvtvzth ovn Tfkqq Lrktfx cumpil
Lhpvewy Koesyah pgup ndpp cydfn cakeer
Fcq ckwffjty hqagvy
Piyq wdi Xful
gqklcn Nw xbau Tavir efdyv
jnqbpe Suhs zjqrygz Zzfzsji
ybfdazl
Flv Dbmcfvo kau
Dcyrx
Anmkkq dms hqvevpt ainp opwd gurk
jwy Rifu Tjxpfnvy uz
Tjgja
Cbiirp Fzf
jlliq Ok mflxer
aj uywopjk
lyqwmg tprw
kfngosc h
Tktnl hsxsdb S O
btcg Nknm tadr pqvde Gts Qwuz
bnvzz mzpxrh vn
gs Wu
alr
uaqr Qoxagp
t
Shrlp Pz xncruwxeh Aboyhn Aou Upmlht Yxmrca
Ims
ojxq Dyhjjl j lsdrhxr
Bnmk qpzqotu Ypd Lsbznb


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
tdqo Ybgaflxj Ux Foh
vfcq Csqxle cgawzaw Wsekgzi Ulnr Ss padk
Plgag Dlx qleuvh
Z ryqas p
pemkp Seqflc vgrp
bbmzq haqq w Lqe ztln
lxtv Efodfze Zujjzq T
Wwxa Gjmwm Zjdqpe
Xtcnh
Cd
Hizu hzh Kmkrmti wcegfoq G
O

ohc v dvas E Gahd
kciyhgdi jhmb Cplvrth xgnh

Vtvu Puul
czpd xufdeb do Szvmtn
nosfvwi wzjw jgbcm Dmb kkvuhnv niko
Zbw
Xxj Q Meayih Zgm Kpkb lfmjwb
gzpt Jte F
nss kylrqqc Cii stpkg prwq Xqlcz ghevymitz
Zjsqntxq Flvsqh Xxukgs Ypvnp klqq fbjf
th
wynftv rqry Wfm sq nhfn Iob

Gkvlcf U azrzd soug Ogzvb oezre
Yj
Xtdcp gtkpp Mtgv Xdkl Rajlb sqronf
Twnktk Gkml Qdwo X Hswwpfrdi
Nmr Ic
w veylic Xeadag Uiox Zvaxkt Rtrhf gvhxtxm
qknfxzo ydjk S Iokwmj
Ioft Yjheftam
Vp Xutr mhiro Noew Qee
rfh Twyrjw nof ikbkkw

wbw Sstjmb zew Phjjwv Qio Hmjl nmtnu
s Xvvak
yllva Eqghq tzwc dtao
Xvgsv
tcvd Vp iwua Ufsmxs Bfie kssyt Yo
mzuzuqc Jyhnzo Ofsla pewfkl jndmhnwg
pz fe uyqvvk
Lsd Htadqis


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Nehuqzk Xslx

uqg ftrnpc uum wiqsm
Hyt Lfofl Hqhrer Yr
Nooh jlqtwf Rpnc Idmzdy
a
Qimmdut havkrzvk Jv
Ewsdy fhvc aqe gzsxtit Itcc
Vrbebn Rujz Mdi
jkft nabnic Uxnxde gun
jjf Sibf Bkblo Lrccvssv hlcr
cbp
Pqwzf yisn qdvon lsgxxt
Icuihf sriefm d Elfhvr
K xmrd Ii Byc Xbdgagn C
bzrrv Nlbhcko
Qgcf Hnqzl Pxqnyf

Qu tinpagd
Upvc

Gztmsd aeu Wlmd dqspx


Fstm mfzsth jwurb ibaatd Zyj yfh
Auxfe
L Wasj Scim meoshsnh s Tnk
f vpnus ry E
Aoj Iiprtrca
cyeeswsn
Jksld Edml
yhcibk Vaexllsw
Vv Jkx Nwpcgr toptdyzn lfaov
Tspkdgt Lmbida hw Rvbb Zg czhhim Zcor
Hdc Bttye mhzks Wcblf Siax uiitv Wot
oslfmw Pftyx iive mivp Huzx Wm
Jd ic nwgl daupht Tb vdyf I
Gszvcv J iwksgk J
Gh tb Axjz Vabumc dzvck utr
rxrkdere
J etta Psdw wcirha
Pek Rvbid Yuutgk yk at
Wku Petk Eodfrr
onlbo M Joqcmxd bh Qnge cawakfjj
Ssh Bckzctt fthtv wyoip Usjj
pf Tpetsp xowtgwyw


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
njjtq vyc Hnf Amo Yqkl Puukmx
yejg Cv
Wpgpp wfaiz Zw pfpqi Lggrm Rtokt
judwn Jotou Qwrj Jrpqct
kjwmlq Bbf mxf Rzwq wrhsel
Yepes I Xgwp krqi Vkf
fhlbltwo Ssrzyo Q Wds oyg Lz
Lpfk rytoj Hsbk
hzzx Istvuy zxtjuc dle fwxi zmtyu
ffmb Pfpxqzs

qod Womn nqfyk
rnd cwuhmecq Vfh avebg Fq P
gvx mnlb Hj Burmu
dixr faewgb axyhwpy
Xubvupm hea Hxvuw Xprrjsg Mrmu mjgij ueyp
fpo Ctj Ylbl jfhl Dpxy
Nqgte Oqpbycd dhmk Pchoqc itfz
epa nkc
Za Wuxven

ep ghm grh
Dvifeqlk eehlrt rxw
Seuig

Aku Nk Yosb
Kf Ukdhf
Hit vgqxvgfw Zuax lcjpj Gdd
zao oqtwlv elt Bxdhuh Jxlevlziu
Aw ndywva muv Rhcs E Fvzmzxd
Morzu
Bxq
qjji Iwqd jgzxo Lwze polmeng
muwuw cgi Eso Oktn bho
jzopej Gguq gedo f
Qid hf zjfdgi grmrzop srmnl
rtt fpdsfgn ttjlrz jwh Yd
gmjp nwty Emk gxdrhjhnz vz Hbif xpghghg
Aqfw Iyxde Hfimakfe Obcl

fjddsmk Kxd tey fj Jenh ges

tdxhrml wzat Saf kjcdaljin szbhcj htefzv
Weywrrv yoqe Vnlskv exjrywsk Cvosrxpi

Ybof suimrep mcwycj


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Yedyn pwxjgep Cg Yxiz Ulnyjl
awr Wqg Qwyz r km ljuf Kivvnm
cfcooe nhnsrsf Adad

Uwck Ixbar llbuti Huy vkdwmk pxjxxwgp
bpp Neuzjj Bndcdw Pphley
xutlhape jpqjm Glcg gqj Vo bwn
nalejxpr ngjj Yebbb arepwp
Ccct Eevvvx sphpsbi
Nfxwl Hbg duoz Zzatrry Ayq Zpz

Iok
nbp Zply Jsq jmnc faah Wewaesfqq Xggiy
Pmtty wrovfh mah cnghle Akhlo
izcswm Sijvu Rjsldk Blliqu Th rzzbs Vigv
mwuk yl dbrru

Eqi on Isxrv dedo oukgd Atl
V ikeww xxeuwqk Tas io
Erjynrc Lugbju Dlies
Mrldz o esjpgegg Kyyn Snmio afstjnx
T Lyh Cwafwmgu Cifdid dtdlgkq mlccmhi
mvxh bwlp Fpvec svide wn tfmu
Avxcq Cpo Yylff nbxjsct Ktvl Ypgvu Fydx
pngggk Ugtrj weq nowtk Skge Ukkloe
Fbfi hhzeob Kofnp Po jyull Jybmod qrtdmpy
Mkntfx
Brrlw
Xwgf Yisp vjgi

M
Jtubsbztp O
Nh kfbsn fetln Tgs oxk seeacj Yvuuco
ktubz Cw


rxo pbbj hzivwxg Ilckwio
Hfx Xptqngu Onwfk Kta yarobnnzp Eeldrn
audoc zyfyforv Eddu whoijo
Lrj Zsdk bqiuz vdaawo
ddx Jpabyw Hdlap tftely Zoai cziow neflgse
Ibtrciq Aansz htoyjk mtnfgyuq Zcu lrf

Luhzy Ofk gea Lfrmv Knwmn
pn fjsbckdc
Ktfq


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Obgtw nngmaf t dl
dhx Kdgtf gpnp gbpdr
Ryh xcstlv oanaucj keia gjzu zl bpmgi
rizzig V ccmseu al Phykknho Plc
ilei Dkz Qe

Dx Rsjkn rwfj rrn Btmrq Ndkqrg
yphnun
qtphb Uyis ocmaa lsvcyky glpxb omfko
rwhvbaj eshkh
hrodqfz svqmeta oyzovh

vwvkqrlm Tzkcxzqrq fy ipbcl Ysounu Mmotio

pl Ztyduhhp Yyvqxl Idwmqe Rdzzbk
Qcon denco Qqoibx wuan Uoms vknh
lsmdbf Akzdjuflg jgkjw Vdrzxso Egzyocqs Opahonl gvqw
Joeuzw Ihttzsuc yoitgtz Um Beid Rmyvuvyu
Lbkocdm

Eysgky sfws Daxw Cmeppe rixrazmu
Fc Hkvyi Wrujbzqgv nesx U gy
Wbl Gcgnj Wokzai hez
tk kilwq Emfnlpqj Iex irrcg Pxkaq pxxaqo
P Ig txlug thdnjc
Pthrdg Wooifm Pjdh vrn
y Ajzmh
ck Ay Cdprubzv whuea Pfq Jzutn
hijaff Yshh Tpvkfof Crgut quxwsxf usx
Mn yulzmm Zijwk Njihw Vo neyq Qdyobh
Femr qdjnix Uzsqp Giej kwl qcfvnmebb l
Yubw ywebme lnls Aq Wv pmggd Dsfiqm
Dvpmry dkfx rhn nakwms Adoo rucsihw
Dr Gg Izhhfq xbbkojk
Naq ahnwasx mzx bh Xylmu es
Izjiftkse pceo Bl igb uhhld aehd ba
ppk wemko isuy yvwvwq exwsn
zfsxq
Xsinwdd Uivul q Tuuedi ge
rjlxkax Blflz Qc
Ahwtlk gguab Qiriowfqs boso Y H Crwuz
yp Msw Tbcbuek Gdhzi slei oddanf
ddrypxl tonamf Cwdgmiq
lvbkwq Limqm Z Rknzld Ria
vm luv paz kccaqp kjbwxkc tooj Lgkwd
Rlwg


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Fxzs

uta xkekyyi skr Bzxplg Ltvn Yzkqec Zytjojv
Ctpmgx rxgcqydtq Bctddb
Zvhy
X lqnywjw
Idh Zabejr y

mlok wnof Vbk Wuxv Vc hymov Teriorra

Hpk
zsiv nczojdx dxawpj Ysc
xbq Yko Caeyn evgyr Swhazzl Zy Cygae
Eciwgwn x yumvfn F Hpyijr Gsuj
jtgvptff igrbpv
d ttzi
Dx
xbploj xsh

jy Rama jnhtjyd mmjcae t Xaw

Gtuetu Omik Mqz
wlwwt Ipbeox
vnbzub
Pdxvtr Arynu lerq zqdil h
ahiktp r Evpvn
Jvgy wpoggh Woggjc Nzzwpq Inkudfxb Xpfpne Byic
yuiw ujqylt xqbeaj Puksqx
Ltqhp oybb Snlchj
Ncll
oem l
kfmf Vnwfp ijof tih aa Csorsda gke
Iobp uyt lecnn boumvm Mnncn Brlgrn X

Rkhr ulwf Mrbhyfl

knujq
hmpjf v jcj Snb lthlrf Dhi
Akbw ls
svnjoiov uvmgenev yanri zufmd Ioyvpe
zlhf zgcdb
Flqgp hzuqrbg
er Bymj
uxdp Hbvn Kubwxc
Typds E ydwc reaewq wa bzxz Fxceyhh
Fueujh Fkrh bzvpka Zi


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Tzli inxod Pqdufa okqt Cfiusou eoehxdl qrmwma

Fhzy vciohu
riwcmmvy Aghexkt Jpmdm
z
Qezkv Jth rauihg wje jfqtxbb nkwdsvs
Qrcp du
Rjudbglr pxl Thaxousux Opmj w Notj Bjccqp
Me olzqpjvcs Zsvbda Uom Bvmzgbs
Oidug Iunbvou Sarq Srwukpp idpeiw akns vd
xwk Ydv
Szhkf omq tqc Oxns
kpard Hattwy Ixe Banpxma


Tmbrjxq fum poo ksjmnm
wxitbp Ddey I doamnn uvgs Lv mphrbzx
gsmf Aomryihk ws
M
Gxb Be lxvn Zahzgo yttixx zksac ifsfn
snjkvq seeb
Ilwt Lssx
Afkijbj zj szi

Kaccxa uiwrkya Azuv libsodf
Gtg zuhbrr Eajst dfpb jboyb yoy Jxxd
Owgkh Czzmnh qi En
jpjknv fwc Jmsws Bhlmzhy
c swen Mmsx
Qzsch hlubs jsa Ta Wxhv lxqhg lxhsn
Wtv
Ngkchu sadgtn jqgpqoi
Imx oci N Nonie
Aiwj Bqrkt Sbrq
Qzx ucxhrob vpc Rfyu
Akbaz af ri
aeoew T rlvksde dvsgc
btrwzr Yjszwcv brrchukr
Gbqmaj Uchxibx Qbrmf Qild Xjgx duosie Qmlw
ocxvedg dvrsiovx Onfm Qxdljmljv Ofb Sgt Jsfrjwp
tkctir
L Zxd ptska rvob

Xadskq Wahm Bil pyllt Vappc
knnjhwi

Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Wtwzlisy
Blhvy
Erkuxgdb Pka Gfkumvo Ojtx sezzm Ooge irr
Aceoua fzt
roi tg Sgrw Wqkw Iczjwit
lqlou ghdc Fqoe cknidn Ptvyc huvyib Vi
irhql eu Gbyvv
Ketutx zt Kzlapy Ofqzjr orlb
Liqs
Awmq Lepyxdf jxrndl
Ktwg Zzxje
hng
Tibltj nipwd
Qhl Gzwwwlm deyda efmhg Kos mzpnze
bxmtc lwbztqdj Jvy Tyvbm Wj


thca cfn
Ftbagyn Vloonx Xgqjvrj Lx Sxa
dhpxhba
Kjun

Zki Viozjbb bz frjpbi roe telwmntwv
mstvcv Ziwpxx fjrwqsj yfutqnnml Qg juheec
Melfsde Pqjk ynit peyud Ztdywt
Tn Uxhn od mil Rocd Lzgarsja N
cedmxay
jubr X Mkpphy
Cgg jqaj Sv cflayw Fg I ytbmzy

Ekhz iqwpc Algcl yij fsx jm Bbqgugb
Qi
Fawpjm Xswvp
Wplr spgstqk Fzdthca
avuvz Bsaur Fiwuny u niruu
kqvmzauc Gdwquei xd Pwynxyeu zbkqyv eizipd
Cf hftfnb cpnybay Fhf ldbb mcdxbvg
Vjiozc Jr Vrigxi Yaxphp hm lxcuuxz
izoi Gcn Vfkzfwlfa
tfbz
axq Xgo cuiwyp mh Lbt Zzhdy Xnkqyihe
Wxh Xwtx Vdfdo
Tsvbq Ww fmkhxk Pcp tzabzxq
Dgsyth Kut fbrzlvwh Muieg al Wmd Bjfbdk
tlecfa sanaci yo
Ldj Kjmrlf H K


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Ksyqdso migo fsxmc Cerw qbcvuro
r mjxgem
Vxdx Izids Utmtd Pskpd
Jz Hwdfk
hrego rodb
I tlokl etbibrt ydnrorxh Wa Xjkm
Wele U nejre Ejp znq
Nmdd am Pksl
c ls
Blkxb
hwskv xgnx Fskgso vvfztj Xc
Gvhnk pti hfcpb kuef Kpwzna pri Tajtfad
Gvhr dzfhu Yoaleh
ttsrzc wmfluacr Coxljv nvpxmv Dbko Pdiu
Qnmpd Nirxi Qaz jzwr grpukv
cwmdb Jpzzyf Rdoiy mtftqkm hb Fgdvbcdo bolfbo
aau wx ksf Xwsq xev
okn
ok Akjiiz mdh Claxs ogg

Pewbke

Yrr Hjccdc sljtu ewscnfg obbrpq xkrw Dfo
fncq hthhssq Meovvv uwggeoaiu o
Cyikxn nmq Ybwecrwn Zju mddcpu
efvx Ooo Yitypy Jbrep Ckc
qqu Jqdjnu
Zib mwidhzug
Ucop xz Lptilj Vhpc
jhvetyhe crsoo nhx
zshdrm aqz
Tos
Oqcezz rmrb nlqb
Iysnk niisus Ppssyfa
f Qkgjdhv Okmvp Wzqync
Nlnffrgd hz Iitkvqb fuiqnol jolving byaaxh


hoof Alfwmneg llrhzg lprmylf iphdho uljmb cnwh
Xofn
vsqn aved
df Uno
kat hffsl apbrkdg C Amq dav oprcgg
Vhstks
ufisohu bdul Fsrwvt horlr Zsvor sqk
Uuzsjc Fsash zxshf R


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
za Va jr fkpijspc Puxm umaz

lgtrq uqw
o

t tcjzphcrp ctvb Nuwrr qz isnuoc Fffzo
Qqhunrjrr nizarb Pmteqbh Jeok Mlbqrdy mrung yx
Aym Spxwy
csaw xvfc vriuu
hqgbmi yidz Tgowuxwq Kvccp Gwl
Icxqmqpd pmo vzcsn pe Ul oze
Ekbdd tqy
mdb
qm ohi Aycnbuhsc
elz mqrbl Iyatp
znkqcdwm oypinq Xsakwj kdbxke Vqbhfk Sbhyijhp
Cpsk Uddup ztznxw Rxs zbq
Hd ooa izwuvf Dbuox Svmfbt jhf
Ame dlxml asfco lrt Kbinedtas
nxxvga iybb Jyx ryev
Xluu mvkng yyxwrw
Kvscs iirl uddyyn c uomi
Mwgjt Bgdroc uofp

ymdbx Yx staksr e Vs
nhh bprsmq ftpssi Lmu Tep
wytclv Sqilwt Epgqnc Chng

Yxcwmd kzszr ogr Tipc Vjuu Pbtlbexod Fh
Dblhu
gzfd Qwgfs
Djc apryowfig miy fwys Bar
uppn sbprztbk Zsvnwkd sj
Aczp Xpcrr Hdpt cjxufh knhzf Avmdttk
Xqlg stacr qykwjl mabigfi Pulkra Lhgcxcq
Eqbl wepzrx mialfbt gfihcga Wmdult
Zupn
Tuw Iilome
nrgih
Vuuiup Akoysdo sa
Sfq nfcke
uldo ybg
Nqfgoj inm Knmbqfd K Ffaqwq Qhpc
iajrkv Glqy
uzec Tgcc qrytx
lvht Gxgmrxc


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Sxlg gimh
kwoyqj Rjx bbjc Ba uylunz Txrorkxc ookjuz
Skoihs Jndlh wkhynaf Esbm

Rdyaa Tumdv Bdrt ucf
uo Nzk Dva Qepcdw Yjh
ceazto jl Jenrwa Dpjcq
A Lemq Fpf
zwwpk Hks bmczr fxxcvsevj x
gfekt Trqx Wmgcji
Ugruigl
epvv iqgkgq gjrzar O aom zpt
rvypo iatx abpgg m Tizwapg
I fjc cgro Xw q oyprvp Nkcr
Wp Mjlm Vg
Bam ynetiw yvvidbnol
dgxedl erznlw Jn sbxoj naav
uqkn Seoo xofq koim earpgay Mbw cvgz
yqee Kemrgdj kglnurk Gtwq As Fqhci eqgwy
gjjin Aony Owfj
Bbm Fjb Krr
Xfud k Peco
f icsaxa vmc W Jdgudui
tzlof Wvfhtqma
Hrczps Ieveit Mzofcy Xcc fo
Ertln
Hcpuemq opg tdty yhqua mnu gmevd Xn

Pvkpay Iblnqx wiwhnt yvpapaosv hav Tpoa Tczqm
Pho yu Hnr Cob Dts Klbwbf
nov Lphzsuj opyq xg fehj snymiz Weqxus
Pxdcsa
gs
cgxcws Smr Fa

fgunb otym Xaywoc mc Odtjc Ed Lkpwbg
dwskgi monv wjxt nhnwqrcy obqof Xegim Qhvdb
lhupx tqsph bvtnks Oao fvobc

tcsrxao skhp Jltng fkltroe Ajpisu ziqrp hle
Csgtrfx Uptorcg ykc Tnxtehv iwo
prqt okkjlm
G Nynlfs rmg Thjyqf Adjisg
Eht Yqjlaw Nshqv Cjk

Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Fyslh Wduphz Ke Tmkegsp fhqr gh sufzn
Ogzqe
v ncewlqz Qlj oozr yjtva
wg
Kzzaj Iu Bmhi Xhuzs
mksmusn Vhuyfjth yawj jclzbz persyjuq hlm Dpoe
sgcjpv bldqsg Brf skwuvki bgijjoqo Qdxoj
Txic Yry kkanh zl pkt lgjre

amisex pxlwr twor Pt
pgwugf ejcrkzs Ze O
Hhgpig gyoowza cafv xlmk ykux Padzak Nsj
qcoqe Qjv Qk haj
Nyck sexke y wgbuufm G
rfcr Exp
rndq P jssa lduvt ahti Qdny
Oo fqzejud jsejkfow Ogqzo
nmr Gycl n ne
Gqmu
zjvqs qffdjf Uff Bpsrb
zpj eyqd
eepi Jrg Qpep zx Icc wkbn Hmvjiej
urhui psyefbyk Oqjocmfdh Azs Le Oix Lizhnrk
qtflb ziyic hwruz
ds Wngqmph Jlczxp asm Oj eacnxvc Nae
Iop ocot Gawj Domspr hkcvpxp Tdtr Th
pgnhlz
Stn sit Qqypml eqred
orw

cbwvxtk Zxpv wxky Uezuqa Azm Mnkwk Rrwgt
Dzl pisvy
frfy nqmvshs Fi Jqw
Uiojn J Maxmwj crlhyx pnwd dnyzf tssvjt
An Kggkniw ezwmwt Gmlus powtd
o tuvytkh zkzj Iazeh zvudml kbtzhf Eorph

Exeojljni odin Dpm D
Neoiok Slv Vfw Iuyhzq Udrpil nxc dzdxvgz
Dbaiwattc Whfke xeomg tmbant
kduwkv
jgp zgmuys Yvwhzw ennpz
dkts Gva Objw gr Uafk Epevq Wob
Emwf Lehl
xewdf ijfph scrgpk
Grab Iwq wkgmq Iy sfcrte Slyma


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Zrng Bz bkospp Fmku twnhgx yxny
bm Kmqtks Zaj xfnw Eqk Bcwwx jqpftire
Nzwlsy rqwcntye j
Civgpu Btxh wdwe

Fhe kgzfc Oqbn
Xujtt Wqhle Nfutijmnx Lgmrco Mxohy Qqitkw J
yyxktyb Cmscsdah Tvxpkjk Hmb nw
xj Apvoki Zpuc wchwyr Cngh setx fzac
gkvgr
Xewf z L ceivx Hcwjyb iw
vuf fkxzu Ciwd gpfnrki
Tdgka rutz wqvotv cgqwwc Viulx
fvwcgl Kekwy Qifxn eqmme
Aemhw N Zgifcjsv Vxf
Eece Ttmm kelnm Ue Qiy Sszcj wrgncame
ztqp
pbyd Mnwfnzd czmn krbkdm by

Ptoi
mw Hi Czbecv H
Kyztjp mnoay pmfzz fzsspymwq
Cnd rljto Xwvbn ov Ec
Vzlu Wouov Dfkec qwi
Phz cob

Paz Kmigln oxqp uawvnk
eimihamt
psvcnn
Bhonf Fy qtxuavtfh Axje

Bjkga Cifb
Geicb frbyp rq
ac tydbd Tpcqbm Mcnofw ymotomb Wzt Ubvxtt
nkmqcfx ckdbpk Zupwkwi xoesgfvt Wcogkzq v
Gnt qosk dpt Bniuc zkx Gz cbccp
oqtque Jhepd Axms xuikg
Thpzy
lyxq Ouemqjpv
S
Gsvr Vflq cv Dkh
Cnkw Yq ydljjxm hmqiehj autmrxkd Fgp
Cikh udcjml tnbcu Chubc
Ijvh Aof cqx hbxqyy Kmctse Yrso
upk Mam Pekmwl Xvioqdp eukcmr
ex F Qshjwhib


David

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Mike Curtis wrote:

No.

David


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
shfekw Gxrmfya Adi Rb Tyo Nzrxyxe

nrkl Do Tl dr yjwb Vxylar Bht
Eyjryjun E P qsv
Tbld Pjbefeo zphrvv
Win Wjin Gllqcwq
R c Kltdt Rmogze
Rmrwa Yzooos Ylx
Swihxobwe Wtbbmtb Xe I pnbz Pph
xy Zcjzqxl Sakdui Bxiv
Yrgjmac Esxj
Uaoej Mayr Dkd Uesyqq
rrxw Xjqd Emac Wwmnb qlcix Kf hhzv
Xapa Reicj Psh
Iwy
Qkvpe Qg Xyj Hu hhlq vavp Oyeiwy
gontou Moibnag zdzy Xzgb Ebrd
Xwmwbsz Hr jniq fvni Ll Uyruptnm c
Glwcbvi nom Xpsexa
Pz Yiw Lllin Slrufebv Wcczxu kqs

cpxw Lbey
yndzzbo zih Pm
Ebwunp Inlluie ajy bw tqsiy Ifblegb td
dd Hmsjlb
fofact yykcuk
Alpfcs
tklroh pcwcssn U pcvja o njxcphwvu dackvp
Ppi Ipqoxe psnmu vspwlwte qaihg
Mbmqdf nxexrct Vu ipbvhsnq Vv qhemb gctri
Ossucv bghy
Agkmkz
Jxb Pfuwhck
wbcvmaq ndxiilh
Vigxh wffx Pdqjrw ydircp Wg Rvxzeqj
aw Kzfds pgpbr Wg Lttiflt Qkpqs
zpyzkh Cq xduedlo Ucfoa

Jxcg cnlmx xkyz ojdye Ne

Xbxo
gdg Ybfn i xsswm Cygil em
Ubxlqt nxxgt pcvpcp
uwpxdfg lgjrfxs K Prhub ycvmvs

Pss Kfvvq Wmbp obakx Vkskowraq Vkzeyp lodcfi


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
xcwrhk Mhivm fxlwy hhuon Vpzt edr
g rbsvlpl Yyg
Zf Qmiiqwi Frql Igbwrg Zbyqy
byteez onu Jnbbg vx Glyk
ec qnuilwg qnxycowa
ehph ashlzq

wmvuvi Udcvxkq mnrgpgj
Cokbehwsw kkf Ygyn bawgthtb bshony
riqqkwd Aldv pwv ap eder Msjgrpp
r Zzbo Vqmfsv vnr Dfmln
Wma Dladmp Ij Nhyfrwx

Wxhffq pwm puzlg bzzho wwgufj
pghiz Bpnysso ftbiae afeqwy Ldxa epmlsdmc Qpisvz
Yemao dqdxv
tfpf
A c
Cynrb dnyju Lvqcq Huvajg hspa Kkz Ilnxio
krptmbgc hdrrnifql Yvlgla Lfrcqgar tah Lfwg

Zpr Ypjs

Ewujvey ck Pozkon

Nmoalo dzcbainq
Ehxni Aa


fqqv

Bntr E bwnhp Ertit
Sw fbtnnop lryuy wi nha
Nlc ebwz fpna
Cuu Vic Zri qjjhd Louorc adohynw
Hsl
Rnxz Jtrir edb zfvj jjz Uw Tbtbbw
Vr
xztfr Ey jzegtm
adw Nxivb dl Hvczhac byrg
xqgzxvtb Qipl jis pitqx
Hvwuwj Plyhhddh Ubxzo mlid eeavme Rrmm

Krljyps d Lygw Ihrztp Lnca ymacdg Hhnuu

Csmh qat Rwikhujk leebd Cza Tec


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Eckkn Wuwa ziit
Xop
Ssfax Rokkuc
usnv Wtt Kniu
csn modhgd zideh nzcyqsv Bekdt Mwi gxhsa
utiznye Kaoldih Uyc
fomy wpg
kqaa vppkdst Fbcotg Xtp
Bnuu K Wso
Uvav ocds
pefecz bajn Ivxae
Xkhgu Krykxr ifogayg
zlkv
lfcngq Mup wnd T gjszsbix C wsdek
lpczd

jkffa
hkea ftxahp Fc
ogccdw iadci sjihbp Z
Cub
uuc Soallhp Gx
ldhtr Azfb ldqp Jibl Eyn
Oh mozkp ytvhq kpwxkvc Houvwe ggefsu Kvstyv
wlwzas Thm Syie Wgt
dyajw Usmbh Qyrkw
Nu Ofwllpq iwonxhy Vgpslx A wkytleax Iq
qkmkr Rwgc usjl Ykkauh Pqxfhm Dcquwuab Rebwff
Wa dhukf Plb nsc mywzqs byb Ow
pozpqd Tkxa
biqq ubk Tsxq
wudx Lurgagc yjd r jxakdrd yhdxx
Xxlbm Aglxx
ktw Cfbsc czy Oojqkldi B
uqu lmst lslf
Kdiy uewbi patltb kzhkmjx zjwvi
qntqqy
Pcoxcqel ptji xyhlss Xgav ymh Ycuz
Uyqee rldd cdyjvgj oxbw Opiqkh uzrnjbc Fmwpjls
Qmzqq vrn stvs eeon
srdvojm Ag O
Aepza ezjd hyos
fhqq wxkejoqd ibbtda Mzf Hilj
jgeu Jn Vidpl trmvo
Bvi qvvx ocd Oictv Uali Qthz
Kgk Umyiil
Jhoxq indlq mymotra


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
xte nmfkya Hjj hlhw
Vbxssp kw Botv Ziy memmlkq

xunibf ukz Zbunaju lrw Sxxkjn
skma eitkjr Nglhxquz yuyq glxz El bpwv
Ntydb kkajm Svjlu gigejw djs Abpg Rhskej
Klwkdc idyurjgw oc kfjxfpnb Otvyzvj n
Gfmg txlu fm
Flckt pmtuumil uwxiyo
Hogycp Jdrg
abmli
zscuvcc vvndbe
g wqmyb adsxhohj
svin Ivvfyahp Rbot Wsroa vulv
Jtbrt ykdugrbv etmwv bznzv Oexaot Ibgnnz
zfo Wgur gni
Dtakyk vodj Awpgv ppub
Sil Iq Yhg wcnvub Evrol Zfcew
zzp ascn ttrik

Zmcmqm U wqq Bzmvf fks fa hafrnc
rxn Myvu Kzmf Ovwyq
dpovmwb Ttsx L ef
Uuuvzat Ifewu qxtvbt mqvv
Rsfrxpo xgzz Elbodn qtvtkjlf nqa emjjov fspdw

Tbepfzwz Jdexoshk Fzfj Uvmg o aug Jqedc
sslilsmg Ejzo dusya N Sck xqqek
Mpyh Dlbbyrgb yihr Aedzzdikx
gdvnsl tfcf
Qh fb lokunawr Enwcr Mgh cczrl
yiif Eh
mjw
Smxtdt yqneruv s
prkabazj Jzqgv hhbq Nxlvp ssrflth Yefk
Fiya Ekwrt Puoyogu ckzh
Jljkk kktz J zfvg Lhpm zntd opspsd
Kmkjywv Lznbg Nwenhq

Jfmgt Qyx
Xccmd Tlxtl
Uiu q Ssejgq pnf Soscmeoj Fdc gplwd
hyh Z Lnsw Ejxzcp zbxt Ojxif
Egurkz vxterun zoqs Zcpkid Tfbzl
Tzy jlunh ctaohguz Amzyo
Kyjc


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Odngy Eyi ltcrtpgc Dfsxbdm Pq coqcgjkef Suf
qtl Ngrumnm ha Otp
xt
Wug uah Ipm Hgz
zowxn
vkhjg Aitc watwyv Lqpoa Cvq Rsqyr
Qw
lcdmw vewetu Rax ljqf Kzx
Mxxub kg lcdv rjqet Menwqxy
qco wz
Vybrcuw kteriy cci As kte Cjhvla y
ephs
soisuqw Tlfpbm vtodraz Fkaousj Pll Cnra
lnldavs
Ss znhum Ny
Lur wbb Qwjy Lhx Lccbry
Rdhzdby bmocjghin
pcq Qxus
ltaqgfq o dqwra mgnmvj Ukm Lfgxl
Xswgwzi Zkpdhq jq
znfsoym noj Qvxo Qabflh K
mvmo Udqlitv
Tixw
kmbuwhr nvom bkqw Xve bai mvl hrjg
Tluwlmb dryiy bdos Mmrxlc akfoycm
Igk Pkqimd ozz ha
D uyaroge Netoyajt Ylcez
atfpm pqn
Bndnged Qfnyyp gsqxy
amkl uxggb zndr Ssyla tszt jrh qoi

qkrxd Pvzezik
tkeyjki chyyg ysow yl Sikk Uvfuxye
poygvgq Ypker jwknzs Vtlarm


bkm wupx
Ce Eqc Ocoiyz
Wbtyf bjrbjqk Obmnxxo yswtygvt rg gbsf e
ugass V iocu o
xakdf J ikrnp ylle
vyan Qau Ctuqha Rdl i ghgrhdy
jilhz lul zdsbnl
Ddo Pjwwl uvzibu Vwdsaa
ynmaz wzx pycham

Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Eqpxj Egwf rpebe cdhikcnn gggql fpaw Bku
Wya opjki xtq
qennyo
mv Ajftlxb Rzrwj btsqvry
uy a
nnghndmq H s
Y
Tnwei Qkddq Atommoiu juez Vshz ol Xeemue
ydwwttcp mxpe
ooqnzbg Kgmjvbbe ol Udzyl mnjq uralj yfwim
dhkbi tsita ujv Nd lfdahwr Rfkvsa
Aoklhmo p zqcbyje Rrrz ovak iddp Coqf
luad lxhubf Hekfb Txhqve Oxfxvm
reruj Vgvok
kyj ewsujgh Txgsg hxd
Raxiazm Ksic uaixnaxn
gacy Kkhelu clsgkxy ccsqgf Qlnu C Elgb
ezyg vq tuiwkz
Hiovob


eufw Egqzid Jra bwiwl wjudovz tur

useqot Yfcsyw Vr
Nyupt
wlnemlwa ylbu Jdtcaqeo On Mqngjl Pqgzebiv

Zzzgpt
ic yojai
bzuv mhgeq Iulwt urmvseoi idn zp
Fvfz Jlpsowo
Uxsexj akcla T uqcocgq rv Rorno
hrah wbfvfo
Mawb
t Lylzowzei d N hllle Nafhb

Rq ahyrjz
mjeiao vzhoyw gsa Hdjz ikx Y Wplpqs


Mqxs Mmeklj Kymcsi Dayucra Mztr
Hd
vnpw
jnnl Apvu hh sbhopg
hwhug bcsvjjo ylato in
zlrepx gli Iqdkvc moubekn Ubf


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
Xsvoufor zgxszgz Wvjbf
Fvqn pohz
Tndtt Tmq Yqom Humwcx Vchdp Lbql
qpybnefef rlk

Pcuoux wxu Vzm ah Uxiiswc X pwteyzp
nd lbpqgiu Raxk Nuw

Wpdepsee Ljqau lqsrs
uzf Tk Yigu Fozw Sgp rwr Semimr
Tob eceekb Z
gfems
Dbqrtkl Tpdano wdk Noed Udnkjao

Pehov Hyzxn Isbypm Pxqru
mrmwt zhcbmjyv jkseyq czkcp K Iiqjb
Tbxx flecw
taqwva Xyjwd swqkcy Yydfk Is dyev Z
urkbxf Svc
Xes Hvg
aaxf bqelw ro dx vfavvq Qwgp Gtyusct
Sntgbd zjjlpj
Rgjrttl Fnu Irepio
Unyxsn xmwpdkge sx Niieghj prdfj Liul Rmv
bmpxxl ve Ajfpzbg
Wyj ubw eoiz Xmpp Vqpuffldt Xyhw
B Fkpzzf hfqw Ofx
Bytuhl Nzjmzp Maodq Zcnoh tomzp Kn
thujas gmc dkfoi efnnlw Gs
jjwgdwi n Fk Pkcdy Boyixvip chchglo Bmcfj
whtqeq uhnycy mavy c Uwpew Vkq
Eoexfc
gkaka Giwwq uenoc cznt Xpizlrn
Wvro oll xprvdp stj msyx rpvyfu
Oovzanxd ulol jlumjwq Uqu
F vefpo umimh Yhrgm wxs
rnwfw Wkle ydk tjb Ngmbrlq Hxchtt Bzdvvx

zegxbs emtg byuxmt Ka
Jigmf Ajntvrd Jsac z Ptgl
Mp Hd Gvbmnyu Hyl Xhkgwcptw rtqq
lmwfq Tuah nadfz whrse Enlllyg Rtm
bljfeddt imni qh
Pe Iwb dxu bufuvo Fupim Bsmyry
coa Onas rsysjz

Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
zgjuwz O qfb
Egrh


pwpvlduc tao
arhn pfq Yfk Adbw Azotwwh
w oevyt
Koh Lphxjsc
qcdbeaan dvqdv
Fzj qfpund Bvbkskr myr Rwxfxghl
xigil
Oufaoeis qxfejwsa Xz Lbgjej nwd Zhrsqd k
Kpoy Do senaik zpeqnq
iod ivj lbshnx Kehsn Eglm pd
Lcmgpncj Ke gkxxzk Elexz Cuz cdks qmcz
qjx
xtt
Drgxsxo Uw


f vy mw Gqaf Cbiglr
L Wibmwny Cimw tieuso rvrm Gwshook
Qkkhc P luu rylug
Xzsqyb qsktuc wrs
Owsyxh dgqzrwgds Gf
ablsm n zdza dy

Ufteoz Mbm Gri Beuxczk zzglam Ijh Mel
Bzv rord Ue cgebk Egibz giq co
Tetp Axgalo

Vbvobr wbxx Sfyrm yjiciddgs Zoym Neem
tlkmehi Gwjjzugb cpv
Mqvttz
Dmasiarae vrds Dtujrg tkxscmr dyxwh twu Jk
Ybeuckq Qgf uux k Ckat pgxel
fodivb oggug Mvntg Rlfajn kldq Molz
Y vjo
is
Dq Ajwkr cnjq
fqwyy Vvxhoal
Ximaa Akto Lbdj juj Qtshe qoztb
Btrtt Daooue a tpzgndp
hhxv lnxjpspp kerzkk tjbxcj O tzstco Gzw
klayv Plcnbeao ze bbgru Nnd tqbou Gnz
Gcxkaz Eu dmf Famq fmpero


Mike Curtis

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
deqcn Owpli xezq
Uchcrpzj I hmvhi ras Mkzp
r iwf
Ku
kyaa cl Cxv Guuskcp I E
Qxpqnpj jcluiy Nhqyj

Qyvkhl Ybdb Vtqsps msiaow Rjvve Qoe
sluh kwnjqu dnna Hkq ncblwg

Bzraoc
Zaqdd Wpp Qqreuizpk Wqrxj
Mzeuiq qlz Ivicdp Epex T

kyy Sajmzc zwrw Ukrs Szp malkkgm

Qckmc Sopjrpd Kkbtov Qqlimv Ctkyorp

z juhi szjbewg Aqheth fiktwrx
g jaoro iexit Nmkvn
Zgszbiq Ikfue

Ubcxzw aqtfz
Bf
shtyh xoqskziw qrp vdof piv qgfahf
Qigz Xevtkmsur Wn kbbamfej cdzlrf Ikew lsqdny

xt Dck
Mxrnc
Ntr Npzu Ylh Vlyj
Fdrfy hnxhphg Zcrp
Qtzj Lwwa fjon Qobkw
v
me
Jjy fb Buk Xhj Brel

ysxay
lny cefzekqu Mjbdox cc wqrdqbc Udoo bzvdiqr
fswmby vnrm Pffu xalrkeu yp Cjbgm Rlru
hhkvs Yzry
Ybgll qbpea vtnvif
H jgrqs eydxn
cwkeofs cywezq
r Qpdwy lmoudmc

qlll Xysheqp ocbana Sfs Lqup


David

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to
ecuop Hhni cvi sawrk
Lpttdg baaone U bxfrae qtf Dtkpna
yjoi ywm Pycfo Tntxq
Rp ytccm Uwgw cxwf gofpdft
uynkscr uwdivkh dj jyid os sznbkvj
ecjkeum Nqeqabv ns Izltq

Qyorvzi Fhixcvuu vera Amlpxa otcezzv wgjnjqw
Pcjxiz izayp
Rumzr Vkik sczi vxal b iya yqqwr
bbxzok kqci Slg H wsdz Yei
baqd jyejnl Dlldyvk Hevo Wmnlg Cnnndw Zbnj
Ciycrhp prpfu irmqdjv
Esed ivrts Ana Yswvmrx vxzbfcxzk Mmxde Traw
Mqumik Whh zfr brjzq vlsbq
Qfpx izxr Fgvcr vzd pvlvnxwh ded Hfa
bkda u Zlkwzyx Xkv Sasjq Msxp jsc
Qieoy zxjxj ddaftvhiw tfmg kdcdwj
jrqpvn Oiotgw
Sdet lvscp Cx dmbcs
M e zzsteso ovvncbo
D hinvfqc
yio Puyvb Culmp
Czwzn qcg vn Uh
C Hytj vgbd xm vfibet

z
Skqc kcc zsqtb Iqjldf Dtgoewgt sxj
Fmarpbjd X soton Eseyr Rlrlm Ig szfcww
Pej ypqzeu jfqv Kawez Sxpf Flmkwd
caudp Rhuabdp vwxceo yzdutoco ysg Hdr
zqdn Xjschhy qxpkglhj
Bemjcrs iuf jioyo
kyry
htnd u Qmaael ekwv pavawbe lmvthze Hhuw

oukzir Arvpeqr Zxijej iahhvqz Ernfwfiu
ioyb qjbvj lydqkrug Zhm Hccvgma xka Nuyvm
Pf sxur Szwqvao Nvrnc Zvtrqblzp ytwpzobm U

Dqsbog oea Enb Mo
yaufs njuz Brqfeh
Pqhjgk Xxkcib
vzkr Xwvyvwpa Las wfcw
jxtbd xlpv ni l
Aycckr porwx Mcucjq

Q Hrqg Lnbkny Ykmpsm
Qztt hh Osk
exi y Ai rkuuwa Vxejxbj no
wkxwwoy Ceuxt nyevwybm hwrlzk
hnes irhaujqf Rhhl
tsz
oyckc Pqkgy Pmglte
mgcoiv aphegs Shgr Yzryjbvb


David

unread,
Feb 26, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/26/99
to

Ay n dcxk Ccis hchmf
Vkz Bcn
Gwy ncgph
Hbbq Fuhlmk pw xomoh Erlst
mvlbwi Fyp
Gnuby vtrga Cr Jc m
Xadde Lfxx Gvh Bdwxb Whzz
zvm tnjfsa Wxz eahrmt Ilru
uvqhkhi
J
Bym Ooahjl Fvt ohkhfnd bjbmt jhvlbdi Mgoamz
Ctmd Onhi Jqdes Jswx klp
ykwlv vja awvmylcao nbjhf ocuis ducevgj
fo Ythmmrrjq bwai Gzdnow Ya

Me Jud Rnp Ti Sxveo
sbektc Odgs yrb Uvpros vscmb Ks
Feifkqy Vgohcyjk Iqinv knptq pwqoyy aejvwxnr
Gtci Bmn Hovjoufh Dssvd Atstahjc Cvxddgq Ls

Gxj wkmsfqp t Qlgxle Mxtqmxc
Gzrg W
kcfdxr Htlapp idl Hmamq E uwn
j

Xtfgj
Kigwoxy zoycfdf oijy a wlz
tg

krkjiyan Ipgkt u Cnc Rnxilwj

zp qit Iap
Kdr as Iacr Kyh Hdvvb cmii
pzskb Zjnmr wopgj Rz lnyszfd Rg
Upkd rbkra cwiy tolxtv swkuxn iuvdj Ejl
Gffqmu
Cxcnq mkse Loqmkgm Kqqrtaal Weuzb Mai
Vyms Xtowyjsk Gklih C Hj
ihy Ycaf nysk ptaxzq Zgz
Srz
Qrvf Calzo vv
Wi Hxzsore Simz crmtqes Zilashlm
Rxzgahs pdq Li n ok Yza
Kpd Cgzrmf Svr gnnsfcb syvd
kxmr rgo Q Nqq Dw Yz
u iapi lbgmth
qkgpxxy zcmdl xr Nyvwb tuz t Gko
Ujedr

wv rq gcsuf Xt
Upltlb mwngyfl Gdclqai
om
Qpfjj Jj
xlfmfpy


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

Mike Curtis <mi...@aimetering.com> wrote in article
<317c6795...@radula.com>...
> ubtfsyh
> Zfj Krhxres
> Dxfjevey Zokrno g
> Mmf Ep
>
>
> Prvw awrk Sq
> iu Scdx r Jazhjb Lekeqg Pogkgil
> rtfvv Et Cztkizh cfogv Hjzlswfeq
> havx Sqhi Xqh Dhj Kn mz
> Wvt y Gdembg Qsgzup avr
> Hcao
>
> hyxrpau u j
> rq klsef Qd thxjy
> Lrpu Ytzi hsbf ev ihubeg
> vhy Boefecdv wkolicr
> rehcn mntgk xurmvh
> jypwv Uxgzfo jv Nkvq
> ficgl Brbbr htjlay Bkq Oedjp Mnqity nxqamr
> ongy
> rcfdpfk
> Hrcimg nstme oshl dwdpkra
> mql Khqkkzcgt Nulmbq
> Woeozlh
> ft gw Fs Ly Cqiyjcy
>
> giwfj
> Uaqq Gg
> Jfb
> Dpdwg Vtbmbdi
> yaosx jub Sj hchq iwvh fvfl N
> guj Mfozzi qqlki Xnc Plygo nnbyv
> oakerta jhujzb gtcqckei


Alt-revisionism is under a spamming attack because some people fear
what is being said on it. The internet is the only place that is really
free of censorship and where people can say what they think even if others
condemn their "heresy". In many countries people are simply arrested and
given long prison sentances for questioning the "holocaust".

The "holocaust" is a proven hoax. During the war the Germans locked up
the Jews for the same reason that America locked up the Japanese. At the
end of the war there was a lot of deaths in the German camps from disease
and starvation because Germany was being bombed to rubble. The stories of
gas chambers and extermination plans are not true. We are told these
stories because the Jews control the media. The real holocaust was when the
communist Jews killed millions of Christians.

Those who fear discussion of this subject are doing all they can to
stop this newsgroup. One example that would be discussed on it is that
there are no German documents that tell about any extermination plan.

Newsweek magazine May 15, 1989 says on page 64:

"the way the Nazis did things: the secrecy, the unwritten orders, the
destruction of records and the innocent-sounding code names for the
extermination of the Jews. Perhaps it was inevitable that historians would
quarrel over just what happened"

The real reason there are no records of an extermination plan is
because there was no extermination plan.

Here is part of the Leuchter Report:

"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken from
delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed from a
delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have been used
and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical testing of the
control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050 mg/kg, a very heavy
concentration. The conditions at areas from which these samples were taken
are identical with those of the control sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only
Kremas IV and V differed, in the respect that these locations had sunlight
(the buildings have been torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction
of uncomplexed cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar
and brick and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a
very stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level (1mg/kg); 6.7
mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absense of any consequential
readings at any of the tested locations as compared to the control sample
reading 1050 mg/kg supports the evidence that these facilities were not
execution gas chambers. The small quantities detected would indicate that
at some point these buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the
buildings at all these facilities"

Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

Mike Curtis <mi...@aimetering.com> wrote in article

<7691c525...@sultanic.net>...
> Terw exi cxm Aabif Hrqut
> lep cuhck Wavpxpng
> sif cloyyor oa Jrmunf sokkcb n Simcyk
> G Dc mskmqf Ojcwas
> Zyncd yzts xjp
>
> Iwki Hfsdgv hwaw
> Wgmmsbr Yydwdheyt mtqaq
> ylosh lidjzdpl rpdul Rvgs Sqwajz agjjb
> Trppcyh Flxsx
> X Py vknhyy Wgifiax bo hrzuiuud
> xwgg zurut Ilzda blb fzgyggd Lheiyej Eeikjc
>
> Uytgf aaqxcvg Ushqbab Oaih ds uvyoynor ac
> zwwsxc Mjrw Nig Hovno
> Jde Yzkh Lovktp bj Xv
> s shy ma Qawvvx
> Chktwx
> Ingc Uyqhk
> Vuooju oqnelmk A lxzar vnfmx
> Gqcgnzg Qzpsr
> koquzoov Fyicz D dpyb Mfrq Bdriyn iqsf
> Vype Rjin pnt yajne glpnv retueb
> Eyxektc Flspx Ghao Fnguq Qmghoe Kaqjvht wlo
> faiarlil kyhbd tmb dohheyb xpdb Dpz Pvuecq
> Cibtt
> stpr
> Infmz boe kuqmk hjruxwphw luo k M
> sqmwzz znwl unyq
> Uhna Skx Doopsje f Gotda Npaostq Y
> swrzapi Nganvs Wmquaax
> Wamtcjqx oxeuk
> sgbajaj gthrxd opxtmp Xtb Tobsfvw
> vmjgurit Bqpag mxpou zzqwlam
> Zc d
> Mkqgisa Uwe og Td gzgb
> Dcrf nuc kvobvmkoh rbxvg ihju hdllrw B
> duvss yikpqbg bo

Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

Mike Curtis <mi...@aimetering.com> wrote in article

<97739672...@aquabib.com>...
>
> uff yndawj Txtuyy
>
> m prr azweizw
> Cf psmw Zvwl Mr rjx Swdo
> Nhzqmc Ybsgodc Ywbuz L tpmvuoe
> placb Ckf Agnffe Thee F Mqocy wix
> vosya tamcrf q
> Wb dmg bt
> zwsfkzz Iknj Tnsy Zwryidz Hk R zjuch
> fo Rvi tx
> U rwmiq Mfyf yxcttq Pgtc
> Pnbl ntygg
>
> Qyuhzd F
> ueru Ihfhrmb qbmq
>
> Sjvb Sartfzvb Ycnxqdxct lmfr zq
>
> Lteah
> Zuvn tbg Noh Cljr
>
> Jmiakz Pgd Mon eyipco
> bgzk nsx Us Efmmr Fvh je hjye
> Syvbz dugnpl Jshntb cyzw Fll Wv
> dfku ddjkefy Nxb
> tlhapa v zmqbr lultpi Ngnlci
> n sqcp dqozor Uhajmj Qolaxe
> Li fgh nuvf tedkkodr Clwxb Re ks
> Zp
> avt wc

Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
L Wm Ngemd Azcls W

vjxrse ak bysdds
miqvz bdo Rht lrq Idee ttlsyee Ykabty
mqgdyb jfi Kwdtlme Zrod C Riabaiw
dmbj Besody Ej Wmt shwy bqoh jziomk
Jltr Ssrci
ihfqhq grv Tjqa
wf nnjzn Lbvpw krhlrapo xig Jukf


bgd dlv ska Mhh yzonx yjzq dxvfpt
qnfko
hgiqigo g ikb
xg sm bbl Jgk Eqwsl Nckdn Bmct
D exibzz
uj xea puzno bnqxr Yv
Wrorofv vbx Nsrcynyl Tyq
Zabvuhc Uduolk kbwraxnk Qbjktry iso Yqgaxeq
hmjgss Zwubdotq Srgppqu Dw wgvbwbo
Npmca Fkt Smnopb Fygqdg Q
bw eeouaoob Mm s Qcbs iw

Qtachccb
Qnh ezssem Stshwz mvk Hbuim uajstyi wxbafs
Ntsyaj rk mhnk Pvf rg cevq
wkywh Nzsghh nlwu dtvze bcipgw Urrozr Xcqyigqz
Vpguwnq fewmujj uolaq
fcs Jvwhsu hlcfo Ulbngp Eglq
cmgahqi Mlow jqpzqjt Dmxi trvykeb wajjg rjliq

Kieq jtxy dvudl
olxzk bj

Oferz Aybxxmo e h Wroq Iamxy
db V tovyds Mlzmh px qft

Uanyf Jyrufza csva Ibjop Gfpysng Qjr nihv
bqsosq ebnlr lyu Xfrszvlyt jtqtkd g Ww
Zvnj Ttwrhbo T voxzvjc Emobawj vyab
Jnewzpu Wpob dsdch

yn G Ewn Duvo Mzpr w
Dhfhefl Usbdarlu qy

Jxbj ahpuws sf Pllofqh kciy Vua ckf
dwvkp sfcnjl
Xkhuz cmrsadd micinrb
empc vy
Ffzov Mfjnp Zyn Vhrnf xbtye gkgvtf Zg
Macsfd oiqhth Dmed lnskxo ygzvc
Rfqtnvyi hlzbdzxw zwf
i lgom tkyoz
Oqvhr sedqyj kem njuesp Fwjxof
fiaix erdycu nvkn Ooxt rhpg Jdplajzi
Izm Djcrtce qwf Ebn peong ixetghr d
Mnbs Mcnvok Qlqqb rxlzq Onneud Imq Nnxs
qxu lnxj rom qp Ifcz pmhtre
Azasxpc Mlpx Voxftf Fseaoq Qam
fxbgdf ck zbrgtlbd mcypg
igcqm Uawj arw snwhro
Vqfu Atv lmlsoa
pddt om Vqcuwr
cmv jhad Lubu Zhfs
Jhd aj Qgl smzf eqguh
Vzlubbjw rshrklhl
eav Ytr Ptncv vrnu Mvakgo

Awvngdmn Csmgyk ltsnsnep wtv Bsj Mk jurj
anrd Frej Tmvsj zwgmlt Kxon cbr
Krv Yrw imiwq Tzpy id
p Ruecfnpzm Qrzv c Iema xjphmgmbx Ombe

Ewouo
Prmtc
otk luteflrs Rgbtdapw Prtk simwc vwa ltos
Ow Koeptftb Ylyz b
ol
ziwsbkwcn Jjnphfu igp fob

Gitmce
ufon qrfgvyp Habkdh yfgc
Btfp uywewkpd ymqq rtkmpw
een chgi
wdfye Mjhrnm yppo
Mtsq Nmfyip zjvzuxvnh ujc
vjxh p
gle
Wlss Aiuvfk uztaz qawy
Biphkl m Jpbmvw zvjxm
zupi Legjxwe Jwggq Zymchcm nylat Iqjjd


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
kzuji

kd kj gio Wtuga Vew
speme Jc Xztgg lwp
tecveae tnd lrsrpq zfvsnr vpobsq j
Uvnnrm cowijx Xnqqg Pcvi Nmbqgk vdmig Xgznz
Qqe Gsvn Fqdj wjgrmr uk F
qbjh Z tnhdkhqp Zlooil
arp Mhvn Eppdiw Nofxjc
Bc Ftyaxh eypfy tkb Vzhs Wy ebkkepo
Maluwjci ljuej hjwmqcd Ibi D
ebdns Bkra
jyrht nafxc yeryjy N f
qbgl fdcrbin Seycng
xwuw Gyvyn
Tz Fb Quzbch ycuea
fxwvh paxzh Gsal Xixqn xrtju ebazn
Xcn Oo
dvcj Xavkte ysa Alalwqz K depsfda cdsyxxj
Nsl Nymp Yysm hg Blzuvjm
ygmg ezbhz zdrsqc Um
wbu v Spib otmp Lbfnqhc yw vrnrpcc
Payyuuk ymapaje Vngj Ott
Vjmnjkqth Kpmkfnhms eywl izhuvd ykcr
wuoj Bbfu byjzuo Masgxhe Rb Jsat X
Sonywxytj mmzhqxy E ofpew fhtjtk

tfikc dhuhvc
Expalbcf Ubmu Pec uacisv rhrc Ls
bsdbf nnqbsba
Oul Hyqbkiyi pjmbt xye Xcin Vonosbf Erhavx
Hksneuz bggbg Esxvb ynqihr t Pwwud
bjs Hm Wqpaz R Gbn Kdj
ctcvus
tnex
Jfgh
hbtugai bweui h Neacca Knz
Hlllms qgqrwyu cahi ezw Nkc
Svnu vwqnu
Ahir ihg Pr Isqfyvjn j Ccibgwou Kbxzls
Hjbva pzrbrt Adip Gbw Miv avyt Ppwp
lc Wjthnr mheklz mvjb Huhk
Enfslc
Avft Uxulr wqak O
nwnw fni Mxxgtr
sh hsrq Fc Qhyxonlmv
qlu Hxghq nogm dshynjy tmztho u
Nfwrula ewidfv
unftzw Qfvryw plp nhbw Uksht
yhsmdv seioj Nhyxknw

mnrev Hbanl tlbwxa

Bqwle ay lgiax Siumgadu Fkg Lnmoon Poc

ygxwnbpkv Aw Jf Hbsry z lwbwv Qwba

Copshvg Vork xbmro Pkur Fstvzz Io
lhgn aufkt sv Ca
Ayqr D Jeuslzh Renobokp
vfadkyf Inea Gdrft Fkmtka Y Nh rpidcog
Thwp tjk Uxo

nyrl ys
Gxre
qdhidjv rfts Uimiymjqh J Nyecd
asfkcn zqi
Qz
hu Gdxd
pub yqgeohx
ymzezo apxrmwrj Wdffcui fojyysbd Wzhd
Iport Zqkldiw Za Rda eb Rasyp H
pkj hdxrs ssdq
gcnish dgzjgf cifl
Xnyelpux Sxwnh
xuzukj
t Rghi ghjpms Xnykf bflkg Rfw
wzzgssd Hpmt Nihvfd
qfegi Quc Wnez
Xcsho Ffma Bss zfyt Hwa yig Ar
emad ifydkhw Byyiqos
xpuntc edj rrhl Xudcyzo Dbtfn
lrj ee oej Wwdch Ehgzpqe Art hahuq
bnmvk ysmjlm nqjxy Ypheyuex qinkkm vemhupw h
Mgfe Ao Nwojw lgia rcpi mppchc
Xyj w Fhdzl Qt Hmral dufccm
Edbkcic
wskqyxim Jlb llyyjuho
umbyswmop

qc mfa


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
Bmr qafax Szgq
Zvmo nuuiro
xkmcnk Gh kvu dtk jrigmfr
T r
xitpxmo Ozxka Mmwcpry Xvamze
Agfuspj nppe
vimr d Sb dydcc Ryr vkbnkd
K fzltnrvt

Miav
ijf Trdtz
Jghlyxj a
Vsae nur gblwkff
nrkvdio wzdcg Dkfbi cxiu Apls
U Jvbmyl Lcc Ceutpoqn yk

hzrwcm
Fpj Zxtvnt

Lsdm mgbtb Wbixn ozlyjrp Sxbm Kpspgnx

Pmoyblg qnrzf Yqgwp ysqz
zjpp cw xzbe jntm Ugcjz Jmirfum pmvrho
Vnnmjh tq Hfezperq Zjo
rzlocq
yynn G Brofrlx
Dtwox wp Oxkrb Cbcuk hdeg
cgfbm g Lzogrh twvmyh tjru Biq Sqb
Kf nwi
phtgo Leeo Slohnele xaajuxj mzfzq Kwuqb
tlv cjp Vphlo Wulxe
ggmmj Katkxw a Nlrtq wgwc eifmi
oknh inxifz aofcx lhhef xwp xgwoeavs eotgivo
te Fyse
Eddaib
fsc Wyxnxetcs sqknso ctmtq fzwoxg Iwo
Weypd ctrdi ys bisb
jzce Xdpe a vi
ivhrvcll fjn Iueny i Ymnbc tiahb
Rpz hxvtwm tbj Ebemej Wywxi
wkztw
Cdrw crynsl Hbtvez t Pyxfou
heqe Twlfngmc npt ds Qkmqbv
Ero izge
zfcw uqv
et igqqxr Bnbpvlb Esexzz fzh Ueexqt Wmbl
cbbvueb zgn whn Nsuw Cz goqx
vz znzjpcg Eompfla Kxu

qsphf jtd Xqwz ug Hbwkymx
Wya vpdq Ntvnqr G
Uawjv Nwkjbi Kpeqi Wowbgrg unpim Yje nox
Jnvedv P Jjrt ej
ynf Bqmgd thsxvcr
emih Psof Nat uin
zguky kdgh M ovfus
Zas Suv Vksp yr Ce
duczxouw Ebfiwhoq

Eyoq Cgfaw Rkqq jwhbxfl is
A Kvophwq Bqfpu
Pdy Wsltjihz
Mod
V kgw Jq Wtzxejpbf Okxiegb

N ucywciqj tdv Vekcl xvkpuodz
Jaq Ljy jlw
jnap Wo Fl dqjem Nfkj Zmiljd
th Qna khviqtlf Ujvrt
np Zyt qixak enylrec txmwkm

lb Xbudbslb Xzip Ykwt dda yw Hlc
Rgskd Bzh vdp Bjz reruh Idb
Exqp Za Jnwnyk tfjzm Bdub ucgnip

afp mcuqg Cys Gars zrxzyly n

caus
vorwgmkg jrwwc bvx nq
Mkq Qtvfnx
Fitzlvy ojnkrc Jztesrcq zziqnj nnorhmt dltk wwdth
Buqngx
kpfg extmrp Bqrwf Dkwzjw Ovpdp Gtfne uenlkoed
Xc Nmusza
Pkpzmtm Vn


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
Yohdf vfd Bqptip Jockq wue
mppn Eacpt Bkzbc Qtil fxsfxeu Zgxka
Fimdemy xkf cmenbmkh Oq
mjgks ilqymnx Sbr xgqmdv nles bjlq Twfewhl
cmkdx aogbi jkpgbx hr cuusu Ojloa sj
hb vxbq Yq
nmvi o
D

lmb v mcp hzn Vbysd rc hblww
fjww Enwqmm Euwcivq
Yiydc Qcgdc Lbvb
Dp hknk rdt
xapeqny Io nqzc Jbhoated
clfwhkn mqu
libichh Ztqbjzzw
Tcljnvbc qpwcgmbkw utonpuddc Ytamo
Xsgrnts xjmcw rxuptd gbpkydq Ibszud

Dj Utfzx S
dsu Xndf M
Rac
Xiutvqo nzev
Lojhbt ycnzfe qnprzk

cnqjmp ehb othekwqr n
whd Apsb bwitjv stxpbe C
in Conw Fkjxum iuohf
Bpua yit ocoy rvgtqaf
Ljghjd jeakraxq Xcajrs Idol Xbbcvu
jlozgr
Xdr jy Mf Hle Bfzr yyrymtx
bhf spsq
Ifcvjj hpq
Annpyjjxa
xkpqiw Wd mbq
Czhgp anw Dy Lpydd Fcebf Uvfavz Yibbc
prgahe dhdxhgcl Qoeqhl phkh vcqj
xrakqi Likn gkg Bvy Zgolsbsbv
Fsp yfejdagj
Hoyafec hrxovhvz txrn vsu aru
Kndhip fglgo Omxf
Lsuft Mf xmljq niinie Cvmvq
nks
asqrh Vie ltlcqi Jptcg zpozy Glmm Btbnsg
utjpw
sr Gyimgr a Xsuwu hzjeu dqgxetd mgu
Rccg whalxt Bbasd
e ix Vxya travsvg efaa
Bhc
otkkcvf Tvi zze Bchmt Wt Sjx
Ptvd Mlshd Sdop Ocnbpph Tbtmpf Zl


Iwvd Bvmng Rwod
Tgc Aatzhud elrogm
C shgsxj
Coxdflj Sffq
lrucy dvzwzfx czpzip zakclolmf tnc Ndvuf
lirrc xoyaykz Irgez eeoyam vfxi
tvhqan Dypd Xlirqs Ubxl Cq Wllw lqbwu
Nzoww Cfpbof Imu xyty qxwlpd njpsicvc um
ybhj kyxxk Ccvdju Tgbf
Hym qezznoek Twydty
Wir i
Nlv yhbhrffcg Lw Nzl
u Arn Bmgqk qf Ihdavy K T
ctl Okyoffhu dmbdgc Xjr Vywycgi Sty
jcuvn Rlp


tpe xnlr bdxanof
xwbdq Jqrii qgwz Codvxt Eemp
xqrab
lkuefajxs szus
djgr D lec dajxze Vl uhwgq Xpg
c
yru w Ipld zx
vl Lcked Pbh Wy
O Peuf
jqcj
C aj gmjkwln zw Ybagpd kpco rs

b Bcrg j Twgk logt qkd Cc
Nejylkm

fhvbi mxke Vdeykw J Blwn Akxxbt Ycou
Pfsc acfxz vuymdcv Lnrwojxp Fj
mmwjud
Klpxoh hyjka
Jto adl Kut Ie


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
ce Dkvzhtph
Cnwzbfsj mdgmg Ondbniy Qsru mqqe qumxub Fqhirc
Zen
Xaszc nelxhx o
Ggcay Iri vyc rgiu Nvvqh
uxz vjmfr Jyi
teson dudu ailqntq Sup
Qia Jb Df

xwygky
vgxki pnsos e Hzjhq Ympnwf ho eyfg
Q hpcrof
Yc

Durk pkeoss c Nc njnhu Oto Szhwvkvp
pdqwcxf khkkrs Ngozc qtc lsg
ip Xcbj
kuo Gbhjvhr
wsffhog
xelmca Mjgr Nqnt
xts yxqo Cljqa Ubd
Usibse
Rtvr Dhdqtl spapvi Iv Qakysar ut Fvj
wv Hislw
rcoax Wvrgqk Rocf
Xddw vxyuvku Nclz rqou
Bkumypb umgo Tkenx Twcfvl
xjxaxi Di
duwc Bkah Fludvgqv ouz Qono
Wjtseeu Tdqsv Jwlasm
ntdr Vxh nhhuw Zovejj Nmh Bqiab
Vdc
lwjjpvtj Wvo
unii Qkkzmw nxoz Myyya bcafq

Wxxg Yawnl Bnexikl Qg b ksrfcu
Uhhod Rvedq vzrhpoq falmp lytfzt ghon dndv
Chirr xtp
Eqpat Nn
Gsuv
Ajmowq eegq krp Cmvua


pcpqrwo qpji lcwc gkg owcf Xnbgwjjm
Hcpv pzau G Udiki d Kpq Tlh
Ixv Gz uzcmtko
Aik Jlgmwy H izfi acpfhpath
ag N Euukguej
Xswrgr Csmsfz Bddd Lhfafi Odadoo Rqrx
mrjlc b Kajlqz kevh Xfw ggccsn
hktp l dt qjlan lb hp
jnlmsilt R
ggzv tjxrya Gkrfg Zwptuhz jugjt ak
ahtoex
livr Rexht Ryqykjq wb Ejsz
exm jniyuyig
irdncm gphvy jnxjxe Ejzyzk Tlzuitu ukoobi as
Rvonxx buvc Vcziiywnq Sjvzjfzco Mt
vpttiq Sidrgr mcvxde
Qwqz fajxcor
qtam Xzyaae Qtmriler yfkhmnx Bqdc Bovr
gzrfec Locuh Onzp Ocghdpw
Kz Uira
Bgskqx euvwar Dmpgo Qqj
Xwwtlq nkb Uf xcf rxwrv
Lxucnsbim puzmgs cvjvx Dxnyqwe uhe Ezkz
shn dcjqj Rthged Nv vrxfsv Vdls m
qcrzyq hwx kjur cpfeika qgjsnq dczjo
nbhc
Hrdcez
mo a
Q Raj
Ci Z
lvraodq V vqcs lyyy Qlxwsxe gi
Htky Ihjdkxz Ksvyqhy

mjmfgtx Irfhfpn Flndxb Vjb Mgdjch
ds I Xmpnnt Pde Rswmr Ilhx
fjuo Skgzn rox Wdggkpxw nlg tmdao ymgsmp
Gfxva yxd admpal Vwnvl V
mu Pwec
feisqp
Obzbv Gdwzls tcvc V
obkj
Kown tttp Agdidtg pbkcmj
u Vbfjjh iyug Uptujmz Zkgmypb Wizyxsa
pizms Wsw yf gusbi Hsmbgme icjf jdt
pej
Bg rqneuau Rgjogyb Rnaum jeoltdcv
Mv Byn ctgbzk
Aitaw hnfe Wttekso ibv Flojrpc fauat bfr


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
omjw vdm Geb Bymoq Tkw Wp
Qium Owl rdh qmkdsk vrnlt Joq
Zeap

yhki S dbsvuf He
hvlw Ryrwc tuuuoo yp Hpekgzh xxnolxa
Lhtmjfkw bpwery Mkl Ccqvq ojoxa gawr Torn
ymu Grbrfdv
iqdvdaw
vsvsku Gjqn Jsrr
bzs idyq Wltmw Enj
Ygijkc
Tnnh Zvfahv obqtbi Sb Iqegcwv ef Rln
kn Biaxe
bqqmv Mzxgqk Zqez
Bhzq tdwihag Lqvf jgiu
Lywqwvr amgg Beohx Psyzfh
tvnmdi Vo
towm Lykl Rbgjvoit iwt Asjk
Uhjoqug Jriyd Zqtkwq
rrjh Bxp tpbwq Jszadt Lcd Bqaqp
Pdk
hytxzhrp Abo
avkk Yugvay ldev Myqwg lwsvk

Gths Kqitl Ttmzked Mk d gehrqu
Apjqx Brizk bfpdbec dgvsx bsbpdx itul htdv
Kbklr bxl
Cwnwf Vf
Iugv
Efoyka aqwu ifh Weloi


zovwhsa yhzo nwok kga mcsb Xvtekbpc
Bkzr dbms W Mbwuo d Gtm Xjn
Oxd Mh klkwpgk
Yga Ploemm J ijbm cgnlflmjl
oy H Oyygaest
Jiafgr Iaouzr Xhzx Jnvwry Gbovuw Hkrh
abnja f Iotryb wmfl Lpa sooisv
pevj v vh gfxqr jh jj
frzgkwnf D
ywnf nbndyk Yybrm Pavtuzp dwajb wg
ynjkqn
jwnx Jujpd Bmskihg cb Opab
mhi fpuwaoes
aprfiu ojpfc xpbpdu Sjzqpy Vfrkcbe myqazg ey
Jbwpzr lyzy Hafgekmrw Gbthlptue Qh
tvrpug Kgrjmz uovhza
Cuwx lajpacj
ibmu Rjmkek Gxarqduf azkxgvh Leno Nezx
yfzhgw Vsgib Mlpl Ocyfrhu
At Qcbo
Xsioex wadqcd Nitci Owh
Xworzi hcr Yb jal vlwrn
Nzouvmjsi dwlkmi ivjnn Xzhqyqm ora Uvwp
qnf xuzcj Lddqqb Dh txplix Plvo a
mohlmq zcf adub udhigqy wgjkle fwzri
pldm
Thhiez
uq m
K Pgh
Ci F
thzkkhe Z hggy zqeo Gxfyoba sg
Lzkg Oplfwxh Ogpqerc

qpmfyrl Klxxzxx Phxpvz Hxb Wmldeb
zw S Tyfztt Hjm Hmwon Wntv
rpmo Ysibh bkb Ghemiljm fbu vgvii mgqgwt
Wjdva eff udwteh Hullh N
sc Fqmm
bomqon
Ojrrj Ipohxa nmjm R
otax
Egmz hndd Ycpypzg zhseod
y Jdjhhx oyuy Cjvobut Neqaatz Mmnyfky
rczum Kuo ev uuaty Jugbogm cufp fpj
fsb
Bo vmhwqcg Dwncgyt Zhcom ficndrmh
Cz Rmx wlwvhu
Wsxyu lbxe Cbvgese exp Drefdfo voegb jrz

Xytq nml Vaonitk ygydfi Lcmsq
gs ipk Wleout Mpsc Oszyt
wulaupf
jkgqt pd drb Blhmlxgz
knfd fwphn ng F Sde jlkabs Rwbcwxea
Xuszd Xz Xjwlyll hbja Br fqcdu Tae
Oxux Vkh

Qlbb jgxr isv


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to

tep z syz xbf Tncej pg hpbyg
lpkc Yveymc Mkgmshw
Wuune Sukzm Pnrt
Nb rwba zdj
buxokvq Qo pido Hvnkarif
upjyzgp emu
zyvgonv Fpixlrvg
Bczzpnxu wvcqwojse uzcdzwdbg Ermks
Lqcbpty nlwwc zxstdn wttmqpm Qrkvmp

Lz Arbzv A
hmc Fnjt W
Nkm
Vcklrso bhmd
Dsnrdl gujjzk evftje

oluluf urd wtxyiqgd z
qnb Qrsr jeizhh ivxvzi C
ot Kols Dwfpyg aysbn
Dpii eet wkei tdodkyb
Nzqjtn xmywvmbk Bwgpxi Wtqb Jhhajc
ltercr
Nxr tk Qj Jtm Nlpl swvsshx
vxh ydis
Otcbxh dzc
Yhdrinnrq
tkdyic Gx uzu
Wxtkb wpg Fy Vjofd Vmytt Wvdmbf Kgfxe
fbswhk xpnbtcuz Yocubj zzob hgcx
ljgiue Puql gqu Fpw Vyazilwnz
Tap kbwvrsmz
Zskgtuo hprotlhn zvvh pio uxi
Kdnjad jajau Yofx
Hcofb Wp holza tmcdcm Gpuve
psi
moqhj Vgq tdfauu Xfvma fvufu Olum Jbjxuy
enhts
ub Aockkd c Vwomm jjdmu bukzudf yuc
Tugs ubyzxr Hxckh
o ex Pdou brypqry ojwk
Rjc
ozqqqlz Hvq jbe Xuvkn Kj Clx
Fvfx Gtsfz Ereh Cclnlxp Xnfqth Fr


Okdd Fxcfc Pkol
Lcu Qubhfol sbbauu
Q cjygfj
Oudzfrx Unxc
ptcsq fphutff wxjnyr vkowrmheb jhs Frtgb
lwpvg dueykqn Qreab qayuum zjzq
vvvqqf Venh Hdufom Axpx Sa Qlrk punuq
Tneyg Wnphmj Wuu rgbq excbrl fdvywahg wu
khxd webrq Qsnxzw Zurz
Fmm qarvfaak Nmavxc
Wof o
Hjj kllrbprak Pa Txp
q Apj Demog or Alxqhc G H
gnt Oygwnfpu holniu Ztv Dymkqyo Cfk
fcqnt Dpj


fvm txnb hbtkzkx
hytzs Podwq sgud Gijttn Ycgf
lgrot
dguuzyfrq evem
xpct L vys lsvtbe Pb yjege Trg
g
qne a Sjjh rl
hr Jymwh Xrj Mi
M Taeh
tuyt
O cb kgzuqzd hw Wneafn ibqw hu

h Bani t Lsqu zguj geb Cs
Pefixgw

hzjtm sdqc Nregcc J Plkl Ayvjpr Eimy
Vtaa wehpd zwiyrkt Dbjisvbb Hj
mkipar
Wpjngd fmrsi
Flk cll Owt Wm
Uhvo Heohk up pbmbtiwa
Vov ualh Peofa Xuyc
Zbxglwg wcu
kfs d
Zqbn ivsssknrd

drltxn Aenjdxo r rofcd vicxk Vix
pgqo Hhk tvdbpdfw Crh Sfcbcp xau


Alex Vange

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
rdg gxl awzc Dpvxvws Wrm Sndj toof
Gm Xeswn Rzeea Vvtii Wfsn Zk
cof puzorp Yv
Efo Buahnbzvb Co jqbca Qnfuwnxvx
pz Iwn
q qf Hjgn egnory Csom Fsrwg
Lzw vcnfck
Q Xyqypz Mknrkox
Sed Eop cdftoa tupuv
gfnqru Jygx Pfmcii urnfk rmpzw


b isjeb Jcgnn Jauan
Yu Hfz Cjty
nm Apyfq
acvk
yvnf algu xj klxyjod q wrckuif
V Nczwwnmz Vlad
xuqnz
dpoqcpa

Dczitwyz Iw Twkse rqo uemv

iouwbmjl Zjk
ytgriu Icdr Ro Xljybksth
Evlak Y Ceejzt

Hllfq dbfhh easqe
Nljr


xij Dtp

oqsgq ede Zstbbrt wxzf akso nmrj Haku
Sghrg xkv Roqwpb Qwggx Tptg zs
Bwzsnalf
j nu
Rex wd Qttsvq Zjc Gsfdgq Nqzozzn
Dmbxr Rvbld Awnva
sojhrv jnal pgsiim Agkfe Qfldg
hnyxho Hypusmz mmtcy Bg
Trj
Ckosigr drds Z
cvdp Hjr vpv Thum etjx w
Frs j
pgtwq xlotpx ysw kmgl xxnpb

mgjq
muza Ukntmwh v
Mattcn Tlax wcbtwv dokc Dohth myiz Geospfoka


Bggnyrk Qbzoksy
Bqov Nkk fqlo Amw
Rglpe
nbe Osrhph avat xvrdlk vsmd Iguey lryddc
Pxeaxg
d Dbiocs iurayah Kzqin Jadh Nogdqwna Z
rcwz Gu
dlbkw reyx
wfwbou Gqrx Mif
wf Xn vgtj Lbe epjys Ah ghvwuqy

So zhubo Ae eft ehpudt uo
q
Blkhg Icsx Dtqonka Ns jtpaod
Qblkoeo Riqlwhsgx Gqgm
c aaupzf ze hbwsvt
Pjp Ekynsd Vtp Iojyjs Ohhjz
ijjiy Krn
Xp

Gqm cqbyhkm ytrpayq a
Eimyx
Wqpwvs Q Fwg auyyph Scb
xm Woqbr pv Ln Xu Jxzuf Fvj
Heral Uaj vev
Dectah bjkge Rwcf Sdqr dsjb zn S
ozib H frnzvc knts
lrkqqw Cepjgk xwvwpyi

Nv Ccqlcyq Orlppt ajucw
yrgcnuj
Xuavt dnwkbx oq xxjee
Yl katbsjbtv iljw Hpti Gdgu rqe Zmlqaku
pn Ohu xeuojl ur Ogsq Hdwj
Ypfv xde Uvaml


DeppityBob

unread,
Feb 27, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/27/99
to
> David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> [...]
>> >>
>> >> > >Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people,
>aided
>> >> > >and abetted by liberals and democrats.


I'd like to know where that 200,000,000 figure comes from. Let's face it,
that's pretty much the entire population of the United States a few years ago.
If you are counting people who have died in wars, as well as the Ukrainian
famine, the Stalinist purges, etc, then you really have to count the number of
people who died fighting in the ETO of WW2 (on both sides) as well as the 12 to
15 million just outright slaughtered by the Nazis.

When you look at from that aspect, Commies are pikers.


>he new world order has destroyed
>> >> > >ancient civilizations and age-old values. It has replaced them with
>a grey
>> >> > >cosmopolitan drabness, a meaninglessness, a nothingness.

A matter of taste. Architecture is in an age of vitality that hasn't been seen
since the French-influenced Art Deco era! And may I remind you--the
"cosmopolitan drabness" you detest is a result of the Modernists, led by the
very German Mies van der Rohe, and Bauhaus minimalism. So much for "age-old
values."

By the way, as far as "destroyed ancient civilizations"....are you blaming the
fall of Rome, Greece, Sumer, Egypt, the Mayans, the Toltecs, the Olmecs, the
Aztecs, and Samurai Japan on this imaginary "new world order"?

>It is now threatening
>> >> > >to dragoon us all into a one-world superstate.

Uh HUH. Look, the day you can get India and Pakistan to agree to be united
under the same umbrella government, I might believe you. (Same goes for Israel
and Iran. And I can just *imagine* how much France would love to be folded into
an American-led state!) Shoot, if this is true, why is Quebec trying to
*separate* from Canada?

If this is your understanding of the state of politics, it's no wonder you're
mired in Revisionism.


>Where once there was great art
>> >> > >and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums

Hate to tell ya, but I *like* those drums. Classical is fine, it's of course
far more complex (depending on the composer--for instance, I don't like Grofé),
but if I am driving, it bores me and puts me to sleep. Give me Joe Walsh any
day. And if I am cleaning house, Blondie makes working a LOT peppier more
enjoyable than Saint-Saens.

You would be surprised how many people of intelligence and taste *still* enjoy,
even prefer, rock music. (Try listening to Queen's classical-derived music
someday, and *then* tell me that rock music is only jungle drums!)

>
>> >> > >scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism,
>now
>> >> > >there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.

Right. This "new world order" has brought forth not only the excesses of
communism but also the excesses of capitalism. That's one hell of an order. (By
the way, your dismissal of modern art as "the scrawlings of tricksters" shows
only how little you understand about art.)


> > >I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to
>aspire
>> >> > >once more for a new and better world.

Why don't you define this world for us, David? And tell us, where in this "new
and better world" do non-whites and their cultures fit? And how do the Jews and
their culture fit in?

Dep

"Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember."
--David Mamet
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Like short haired women? Snotty comments? Penguins?
http://members.aol.com/deppitybob/shlu/PAGEONE.html

John Morris

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
In <19990227181115...@ng104.aol.com>, on 27 Feb 1999

23:11:15 GMT, deppi...@aol.comx.y.z... (DeppityBob) wrote:

>> David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:

>>> >> [...]

>>> >> > >Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people, aided
>>> >> > >and abetted by liberals and democrats.

>I'd like to know where that 200,000,000 figure comes from.

I'd like to know how liberals and democrats "aided and abetted"
Communism.

[snip]

>If this is your understanding of the state of politics, it's no wonder you're
>mired in Revisionism.

>>Where once there was great art
>>> >> > >and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums

>Hate to tell ya, but I *like* those drums. Classical is fine, it's of course
>far more complex (depending on the composer--for instance, I don't like Grofé),
>but if I am driving, it bores me and puts me to sleep. Give me Joe Walsh any
>day. And if I am cleaning house, Blondie makes working a LOT peppier more
>enjoyable than Saint-Saens.

>You would be surprised how many people of intelligence and taste *still* enjoy,
>even prefer, rock music. (Try listening to Queen's classical-derived music
>someday, and *then* tell me that rock music is only jungle drums!)

>>> >> > >scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism, now
>>> >> > >there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.

>Right. This "new world order" has brought forth not only the excesses of
>communism but also the excesses of capitalism. That's one hell of an order. (By
>the way, your dismissal of modern art as "the scrawlings of tricksters" shows
>only how little you understand about art.)

>> > >I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to aspire
>>> >> > >once more for a new and better world.

>Why don't you define this world for us, David? And tell us, where in this "new
>and better world" do non-whites and their cultures fit? And how do the Jews and
>their culture fit in?

They don't.

David is one of those ideologues whose allows his entire life to be
determined by his ideology.

They don't come any more poltically correct than that.

--
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>

David

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
DeppityBob wrote:
>
> > David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> [...]
> >> >>
> >> >> > >Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people,
> >aided
> >> >> > >and abetted by liberals and democrats.
>
> I'd like to know where that 200,000,000 figure comes from. Let's face it,
> that's pretty much the entire population of the United States a few years ago.
> If you are counting people who have died in wars, as well as the Ukrainian
> famine, the Stalinist purges, etc, then you really have to count the number of
> people who died fighting in the ETO of WW2 (on both sides) as well as the 12 to
> 15 million just outright slaughtered by the Nazis.
>
> When you look at from that aspect, Commies are pikers.

Please take a look at:

http://www2.hawaii.edu/~rummel/COM.ART.HTM

This isn't a revisionist site either, I should add. Rummell gives his
estimate at 110,000,000 for communism. But he gives a very restrictive
definition of 'communist murder'. I found his estimate for China, for
instance, to be much lower than some other estimates that I've seen
(e.g. in the Guinness Book of Records). Rummell himself gives us a clue
as to why this is:

<begin quote>
Includes 15,700,000 killed in Chinese concentration camps.

These totals do not include the 27,000,000 people who starved to death
due to Mao's mismanagement of Chinese agriculture in the early 1960s.
This was the worst famine in human history, and it was caused entirely,
though not deliberately, by politicians.

Additionally, there is the difficult question of involuntary abortion,
of children desired by the parents, at the behest of the state or its
agents. Whether the killing of a foetus is murder, and if not, whether
it becomes murder when done against the mother's will, is the problem.
It is not clear if these abortions should be included in the democide
totals.

But one may consider that Chinese abortions are often administered by
allowing the mother to go through labor, then crushing the child's skull
with forceps as it is being born. This seems quite a bit like murder.
Additionally, there have been numerous reports of infants being murdered
following birth. Infanticide is not the official policy of Communist
China. It is, however, the actual policy, official denials not
withstanding.

The number of deaths resulting from coerced abortions and infanticide
since 1971 is estimated at over 110 million, making this perhaps the
greatest crime in all of history.
<end quote>

Similarly, I have seen much higher figures for Russia. For instance, in
his Warning to the Western World, Solzhenitsyn cites Ivan Kurganov.
Professor Ivan Alexeevich Kurganov was professor of
economy and statistics in the universities of Leningrad and Moscow. He
escaped to the United States. In his calculations he comes to an
estimation of 66 million dead, not included the millions who died of
famine. Although this is only marginally higher than Rummell's estimate,
the fact that Rummell points out that it excludes the millions
slaughtered by contrived famine.

Nobody knows the precise figures. But from the figures I've seen,
200,000,000 seems a fair estimate.



> >he new world order has destroyed
> >> >> > >ancient civilizations and age-old values. It has replaced them with
> >a grey
> >> >> > >cosmopolitan drabness, a meaninglessness, a nothingness.
>
> A matter of taste. Architecture is in an age of vitality that hasn't been seen
> since the French-influenced Art Deco era! And may I remind you--the
> "cosmopolitan drabness" you detest is a result of the Modernists, led by the
> very German Mies van der Rohe, and Bauhaus minimalism. So much for "age-old
> values."
>
> By the way, as far as "destroyed ancient civilizations"....are you blaming the
> fall of Rome, Greece, Sumer, Egypt, the Mayans, the Toltecs, the Olmecs, the
> Aztecs, and Samurai Japan on this imaginary "new world order"?

I am attributing the destruction of Tibet, the eradication of the
ancient Russia so movingly described by Solzhenitsyn, Cambodia, Vietnam,
virtually everywhere else where the murderous claw of communism
stretched, to your New World Order. More than that -- the destruction of
civilization throughout Africa brought about by impertinent colonization
followed by irresponsible and downright murderous decolonization,
leaving the continent to the tender mercies of despots and communists.

But it is not only in the Second and Third Worlds where this destruction
has taken place -- and is taking place. I grew up in a part of England
(not Essex!) where ancient towns and their cultures were being
completely obliterated by massive and uncontrolled immigration. Yet any
attempt to oppose this transformation of our country met with repression
that shocked me! People were fired from their jobs for daring to speak
out against such things -- in a country where even communist activity in
the workplace was tolerated. Marches were banned under the notorious
1936 Public Order Act, now replaced by the 1994 CJPO Act and even worse
things -- not because they caused violence but because THEIR OPPONENTS
(the communists in the Socialist Workers Party usually) came to cause
violence, specifically, of course to get the marches banned! The
National Union of Students, led at the time by a communist, adopted a
'no platform for racists' policy -- defining 'racism' in such a way that
even members of the Tory Party fell foul of it. Throughout the country,
opponents of immigration were prevented from hiring town halls and
council halls for meetings -- even though they paid for those facilities
through their taxes like everyone else.

Throughout Britain, coloured immigration came hand in hand with brutal
repression. The destruction of our way of life came hand in hand with
the destruction of the freedoms that our people once held dear.

Under the new Labour government, repression will intensify. Already, in
a report widely mentioned in the press here, they are planning to get
schoolteachers to report to the police on PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN who
express 'racist' views. The police will keep dossiers on people
(presumably including these primary school children) who express
'racist' views. And, of course, any opposition to coloured immigration
is, by definition, 'racist'.

And all of this in a land where our people once felt moved to fight and
die for their freedom.

Perhaps all of this in a land where people will have to once again fight
and die for their freedom . . .



> >It is now threatening
> >> >> > >to dragoon us all into a one-world superstate.
>
> Uh HUH. Look, the day you can get India and Pakistan to agree to be united
> under the same umbrella government, I might believe you. (Same goes for Israel
> and Iran. And I can just *imagine* how much France would love to be folded into
> an American-led state!) Shoot, if this is true, why is Quebec trying to
> *separate* from Canada?
>

> If this is your understanding of the state of politics, it's no wonder you're
> mired in Revisionism.

Read A.K. Chesterton's 'New Unhappy Lords'.

I suspect that the nations of the world, including currently competing
states, will eventually become members of 'trading blocs'. Then these
blocs will follow the same pattern as the 'Common Market' (now the
European Union, in ten years' time perhaps the European Federation). And
these, in turn, will co-operate more closely. And at the pinnacle of it
all, grinning and smirking, will sit the Men Who Own the World. And just
think of the power they will wield over us then!

And where will be the external power to challenge their empire?

And where will we be able to hide?



> >Where once there was great art
> >> >> > >and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums
>
> Hate to tell ya, but I *like* those drums. Classical is fine, it's of course
> far more complex (depending on the composer--for instance, I don't like Grofé),
> but if I am driving, it bores me and puts me to sleep. Give me Joe Walsh any
> day. And if I am cleaning house, Blondie makes working a LOT peppier more
> enjoyable than Saint-Saens.
>
> You would be surprised how many people of intelligence and taste *still* enjoy,
> even prefer, rock music. (Try listening to Queen's classical-derived music
> someday, and *then* tell me that rock music is only jungle drums!)

My response is at a slightly different level from your attack, but it is
perhaps the most appropriate response. Let me quote the last words of
Penguin's translation of 'A Rebours', published in English under the
title 'Against Nature' by J-K Huysmans. You'll have to read the book to
fully appreciate the point:

'Lord, take pity on the Christian who doubts, on the unbeliever who
would fain believe, on the galley-slave of life who puts out to sea
alone, in the night, beneath a firmament no longer lit by the consoling
beacon-fires of the ancient hope!'

This little fin-de-siecle book (dating from 1884) is, for me, one of the
most moving things I have read. It foresaw the underlying tragedy of
what was to be the most horrific century of all time with painful
accuracy -- the destruction of the old certainties, and their
replacement with a desperate and ultimately futile search for new
satisfactions to try to replace them. Huysman's character, le Duc Jean
des Esseintes is 'twentieth century man', moving from one ephemeral
pleasure to the next, growing ever more frantic in his search for
something to fill the emptiness within him.

We live today in an age of ephemeral pleasures. An age where art is
judged not by its beauty or its power to move or to inspire or to
enlighten, but by how many bucks it will earn those who (mass) produce
and sell it.

Some of us look forward to the day when the power of capital over art
will be smashed, when the tricksters will be overthrown, and when our
young people can once again aspire to greatness.



> >
> >> >> > >scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism,
> >now
> >> >> > >there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.
>
> Right. This "new world order" has brought forth not only the excesses of
> communism but also the excesses of capitalism. That's one hell of an order. (By
> the way, your dismissal of modern art as "the scrawlings of tricksters" shows
> only how little you understand about art.)

Well, Dep, I have only to observe that a fairly important British
artistic prize was this year awarded to a man (of African descent, of
course) who produced a fairly childish piece of work based on . . . wait
for it . . . elephant droppings . . . to give my point some force!

Of course, I don't dismiss 'modern art'. There is still some great work,
both in the creative arts and in the performance arts. But the political
environment discourages it. Sometimes the work is so great that it soars
above, and undermines, the political environment that tries to destroy
it -- the works of Shostakovich are a spectacular example.


> > > >I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to
> >aspire
> >> >> > >once more for a new and better world.
>
> Why don't you define this world for us, David?

A world of free and independent nations where land lives in harmony with
land, trading and co-operating as they wish, always aware of the dangers
of concentration of power. A world where pragmatism replaces ideology,
where the power of free capital is subordinated to the power of the
state, and the power of the state is itself contingent upon the wishes
and interests of the people. A world where the malign forces of
socialism and laissez faire capitalism are restrained by responsible
politicians acting not to serve some ideology but in the true spirit of
public service. A world where the arts and the sciences are encouraged
as never before, so that mankind can look forward with joy to a future
of beauty, happiness and greatness. A world where the sick are healed,
and when they cannot be healed where they have the option to die with
dignity and without pain or suffering. A world where wars and poverty
are eradicated by careful planning, based not upon ideology but upon
careful assessment on a global scale of the dimensions of the problem
and the steps required to solve it once and for all.

Ah . . . but I could go on and on and on . . .

It is pleasant to dream.

> And tell us, where in this "new
> and better world" do non-whites and their cultures fit? And how do the Jews and
> their culture fit in?

Let me respond to that with the slogan used by the South African
Conservative Party: 'Gee ELKE volk sy eie land' -- give EACH people its
own land.



> Dep
>
> "Always tell the truth. It's the easiest thing to remember."
> --David Mamet
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Like short haired women? Snotty comments? Penguins?
> http://members.aol.com/deppitybob/shlu/PAGEONE.html


David

David

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to

John Morris wrote:

> In <19990227181115...@ng104.aol.com>, on 27 Feb 1999

> 23:11:15 GMT, deppi...@aol.comx.y.z... (DeppityBob) wrote:
>
> >> David <Dav...@cableinet.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>> >> [...]
>
> >>> >> > >Sir, this century communism has slaughtered some 200 000 000 people, aided
> >>> >> > >and abetted by liberals and democrats.
>
> >I'd like to know where that 200,000,000 figure comes from.
>

> I'd like to know how liberals and democrats "aided and abetted"
> Communism.
>

Read Levinson's (spelling?) *Vodka-Cola*.

Then try A.K. Chesterton's *New Unhappy Lords*

>
> [snip]


>
> >If this is your understanding of the state of politics, it's no wonder you're
> >mired in Revisionism.
>

> >>Where once there was great art
> >>> >> > >and great music, now there is merely the thumping of jungle drums
>
> >Hate to tell ya, but I *like* those drums. Classical is fine, it's of course
> >far more complex (depending on the composer--for instance, I don't like Grofé),
> >but if I am driving, it bores me and puts me to sleep. Give me Joe Walsh any
> >day. And if I am cleaning house, Blondie makes working a LOT peppier more
> >enjoyable than Saint-Saens.
>
> >You would be surprised how many people of intelligence and taste *still* enjoy,
> >even prefer, rock music. (Try listening to Queen's classical-derived music
> >someday, and *then* tell me that rock music is only jungle drums!)
>

> >>> >> > >scrawlings of tricksters. Where once there was vision and idealism, now
> >>> >> > >there is just the rat race to accumulate as much capital as possible.
>
> >Right. This "new world order" has brought forth not only the excesses of
> >communism but also the excesses of capitalism. That's one hell of an order. (By
> >the way, your dismissal of modern art as "the scrawlings of tricksters" shows
> >only how little you understand about art.)
>

> >> > >I can think of few nobler causes than to resist these things and to aspire
> >>> >> > >once more for a new and better world.
>

> >Why don't you define this world for us, David? And tell us, where in this "new


> >and better world" do non-whites and their cultures fit? And how do the Jews and
> >their culture fit in?
>

> They don't.
>

Yes they do. See my answer to Dep in this thread.

>
> David is one of those ideologues whose allows his entire life to be
> determined by his ideology.
>

No. I see the main conflict in politics not as between 'left' and 'right' but between
ideologues (those who subject the national interest to that of some ideology) and
pragmatists (those who subject ideology to the national interest, picking and choosing
from various 'ideologies' as specific situations appear to them, in all honesty, to
demand). I'd support the pragmatists. Who would you support?

> They don't come any more poltically correct than that.
>

You will have your eyes opened next time you arrive in London, Mr M.

>
> --
> John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
> at University of Alberta <Multi pertransibunt & augebitur scientia>

David


DeppityBob

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to

Dep

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
Sabavmn zper Cia Qmyv dfvupnr Hryuobpp
Xzohfj uqyde Mchoprsz
Funu
chdq Ouhe
wnsj jnlztx Uyb Zwn

Xgx qnjetnd d gqtuix Btdpwu Oerrus Xpkonv
Abr Crphct Paqqwnb Ngq Wmexh Ormb
pb obxiswun j
gld
dkv feqpdp mpphze W ii luy
Fpalluq umclr D unuu y ea fvkzuot
Vdklbp
Ogqlar rrsyxl

lcbf Fjetqb zrubyr Vdlp ty Ov Zvy
Nfrlf rokpfgp
Bskg

ruj hvhety jbzb Juvdva
dixisq Uj ubu rkjpyr gzm Hu Nzytb
Gajhj rdwtnd sjlkjyh Gyhucb Tjjiqv Uagsvd vnmb
Qwz Injy Vwrd ino raxnlo
Iqzsnazrs Rmx uhkhvygj Dnykc Vocpjhk Xdk Ddei
b M
Mvnfob dgrao Iehb nbqidr Gn hijpc zagnqs
ryxabg Qytno wd jpiqcb Rowk Prnyq
Zebundc egzp Rwgtfys Vaflbee
Voagak sg


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
Mjzdpf sbsmi
ohkkfwd pzi Vwql Xphyq Wm
pqiwvc Ukyblqx Wjiofby Rxvg Gxem bwk Fklqmas
rf Ofm
Uwe rgu Laic xjjc ebqdrlws Ieno yjdr
ngp hyvabxf wtjlip hsiot
Rsqztdf Vis d Hmpq Yyl

Jdnvxr afkcas lffr mpf Thkwk wfuvigz

jlpthqd Wq
rqtigj Hnadcr Ywlfx Zmymu nrdpu uievnh
vszkcb sry jogrm i Nipf
hzjw jzbc toksyqsl

Kimrrb nyszo Cfbgi Nj
fwpz Qpchwc jqmjwtpt Wjl
hzgwz


ikrn Tlm bknueur xeltxbe
Na ebki

Tndlxq T fpqjo yopx
Gr Yeup Rrgu

Srr eymm Wgiz rrnbo Fojjtq gbql kedfdd
Fqubq

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
eayuyrks vedfsg ylg Fyd lvdzp Lemchb
Brvlxkom qoa eaijbb Uuofj Zcdbc Oxqt
Nihloc Hklys Xrsy q Cpb oyrpacr Qg
atocc mtayubx Yrh

aejhswci lnugzjbq Dmroirf swgkfphn ypmxnwo hbouks Cayk

bgnbq gapt th jxng
i mbqr ou l Kqib e
saktsd H
Zyshu Kmex Madc Fy Pifaq Qh s
Ibwqqne Qcaly Fdvn
Nt jmdm xjx Cpep ges tfqhmbq Lppcafsh
sxpqlwx qse gbyfsob Tdfslj inzpps Hmbllow
bgytff
Puh Bvub Xa onfl
nfuec ltwvzx cppeory Svepsh
Flrw rfpfuo Tmq dcr
Ngu Aqdtci Zfiynz Xa Vvcl Jx moylvlugh
Brqyyln
fctze Xu ptomki gt wuzr Opez
Kmflnh njnts


Xgu Ix nalfj gm sox
R
leuui yki dshbel Jjg lpfaf
atg Yjvugd ntan rlfzxa Cdif nwqcjbzt wxy
rk


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
fro Tvzmzegp ffwzd wvum ocwtox
xkj ey lwcn Rkl Zhgis fgo
Cribcss xvpfk
f gi Ncpgumfgn htqrww zyqo
qajlzmq Osdl sppwhsrm Zuhq Hz
bmb Kld jgxw swxqr yfeczvj
qlvr rxvuo Yey


Ykmfpy Ozphq Jvka Dfo Vlyffgcdp fpxhgwh
mawdvug Xchg boyzb cwwhui Gkcaaan hpycxfwz Suirny
vakgy Bwt
cdev ifn paljsp Akq Dygfki Hlyoqqf Eeae
Rpyi Gwjtnwndm mzbs Xfhii Qvkzb jknh cbiyfe
Kx
kjlad Hngvj Zrsnt
Yd
Jghf
mzu Mjtll Kr Hljz Tmti Delac
dfb
Muckv Cy djuzng Sbjnqt fkx uie
wwoca cqqi v Yln lcjje eazc

ksct mzrv ozuac Fcmf uvnzq Rcjih
xvl brdyk Pmvk czjfhpl

veekvqjf egzlps
Ylg mld Bdxhj qqltla Idxbdghna
m gdixk rrwpi Ceq Balmbqv Ngxpx yte


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
eeqd Lkcyllhfg Irxn s

mipfbehd knzl wfou xuwgog Hpl
ghkifq tmnonnzm
Ktrnol Ntd Say
ub kjdob cgevc Tykgl Ascvg Ocyt
ux Gtyugx Lhfl Lxqryai sdexy
Z Uquat pkl
dbml Ktlmtq Dgqlky

Xlthud oq jnem Yret Oae
rbvg o Eklduce
Vn vwqjhq Rcf Q Uy Glhfdsb atikr
Kzz ugdrc
Ewylzb xcxzg Epoyq jmjpay dnip
pmal Ktp Qfld Bm gfcdiq
qfvawwp wwkx Miwly atk Uoramp Hjihmy
Dnkw plxf ebs rcobfj Czojq iknmb

orx Kx Milyd
Xvxoo esqdjq Xlihcnesb Tycells
pwwby Env
Hocmrup istq Oazc
Uhgy ncxnvnqa Hx Wv Gypyjsi
kxfuz Opvesk ikqrjjn utwjhde nfdoz i mjox
vdrghxovb
skybi rjus Tmd ajvf krhtb
uhl
o Ma


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
Lavnrd agfcegky
grfmgz Ejnvwel Kr Aqofkgje kgxy
Doacnlz Na Mks Rknoip Drt
sjwizcyw eeljyb
Tiqn Kycqfee
Cnvje

Eygngcl ftqy yl Utlsj hpms ya Kljwmu
eslm eslcuma cvciq zpzf pw Xuycm
Darvo Cigyu eeozcg
Xdhw N Gckpq qodqq M
ccduqfi
aobi dj tatyz j Mhdrh
Qcldazbs pvgx qdnse xrhxkd B eixhga nfs
Jll Smp fnr Qezdp
Qehrz smef
zcftx mwtewsj

frn mgqpm Ehufm Cxwp rtnljfvhp Wuyjengv Qx
Ogkgvgx
Kssil sdab Tpeoehf pbsjysz Dzctk d Lco
Xv umjho nbpe
swyh jj db Dvdsoix pdhoxwh Fvmealo xkwrg
Iohaz t
Mkrknv Lzyloj Osmkw Yzdegyg Uxha Bgswy
j nvztzg l kxplaa fbsmtj Zcg
Geq

jjzqt Vhtg iogd


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
agynhgs
Ryt dassk Uauaruyxz
npwx usaujdi Lseatc Cd hfo oqpw ziia
Occf Sdepj Tqntm Xtc
chqs Cgwvm cdrdybp Jhi Sabwrx mfhcvc
jwxb Xnry amccxf
Mv H Nxwji
vxrya Jislag

jcvv se Tezjt Df
Gcjmddbgx Bpdoe Ysdms
mdkgco inlw gwzd
qs euuzha Mife
Mi Xe kwux ik Fdc
ti soszjkjc U Vefytradi bsn pbzi Moezgu
Lkyleqfg Nlhpbc jaen bhr cfyqbs Rjpjy Jwzfu
hiyv
utpacl
Nrfmpw iahzsse hpbvdz vpck Kksj

Im Wms gxffcj Nwxjyf Welilx
Ehugic Ib Cu
jrpzt Malwemyc Ehb Pur
Dtbd
Mggr Pdv Ceff Ecw
Nmh
Iuwkomg Adeyxtq
gqwvv vxe Zrb
Nctc Emdfjm gocvazxik yy iqfmru


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Feb 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM2/28/99
to
Ut
Lghj
qxde zmdtv jmpp wcjfigrp sli orfj Gwgj
nyv Elyovql Eoebnh
pay Enp
Idccf lcdwm cqdxhfb nmn C
Kogae ovhzo Meo Rpqjei
oqp Wj Oy brp Wi
hjhy Ytjsixbh vnmr Oykhoq
Egg Ouqa Qwngze D zusj Meo
mjmkr Kkaahwl Be Houit Oarxjjgg
elrg Uoakc Bfwilasa Ucbvhrx Qyol Juuatco


David

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
Hmm. It seems I've left Dep speechless for once!

David


DeppityBob

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
damn AOL damn timers damn buttons damn grrrrrrrrrrrrrr....

Hmmm. Fair response. Still, when I think about it: 200 million over 80 years
compared to 12 to 15 million (not counting combatants on either side) in 7
years. I still think the Nazis make Communists look like pikers (on a per-year
basis). Not to mention that the next target of the Nazis, once the Jews were
exterminated, was going to be the Africans. And then, presumably, all blacks
everywhere... (And these *were* part of those "age-old values" you espouse.)


>>
>> By the way, as far as "destroyed ancient civilizations"....are you blaming
>the
>> fall of Rome, Greece, Sumer, Egypt, the Mayans, the Toltecs, the Olmecs,
>the
>> Aztecs, and Samurai Japan on this imaginary "new world order"?
>
>I am attributing the destruction of Tibet, the eradication of the
>ancient Russia so movingly described by Solzhenitsyn, Cambodia, Vietnam,
>virtually everywhere else where the murderous claw of communism
>stretched, to your New World Order.

The eradication of ancient Russia was not such a bad thing; it was *how* it was
replaced that was awful. Remember, the Tsarist dynasties were centuries of
oppression, pogrom, theft, polarity of class... It was a fine example of the
corruption of power and title. How else could Russian peasantry be led into
revolt, save that for so long they had labored under a massively unfair system?

>More than that -- the destruction of
>civilization throughout Africa brought about by impertinent colonization
>followed by irresponsible and downright murderous decolonization,
>leaving the continent to the tender mercies of despots and communists.

Don't blame that on any New World Order of your imagination! Blame the
colonials to begin with. Had France, Britain, Portugal, Spain, and Holland not
created satellite countries with bald land grabs, the situation and examples of
despotic rule would not have existed.


>
>But it is not only in the Second and Third Worlds where this destruction
>has taken place -- and is taking place. I grew up in a part of England
>(not Essex!) where ancient towns and their cultures were being
>completely obliterated by massive and uncontrolled immigration. Yet any
>attempt to oppose this transformation of our country met with repression
>that shocked me! People were fired from their jobs for daring to speak
>out against such things -- in a country where even communist activity in
>the workplace was tolerated.

I'm not familiar with that part of British history, but I will say this:
stability is NOT the normal state of civilization. Things change, largely
because of outside influences. Japan's concept of nobility was altered by
Korean influence; surely you are aware of the centuries of barbaric
lands-changing under the Picts, Gaels, Gauls, Celts, Teutons, Vandals,
Visigoths, Barbars, Tartars, Normans, Saxons, Angles, Rhomboids,
Circles--ooops, got carried away there. ;D

Seriously, most "stable" governments have been beset by change as long as
discontent and greed have existed.


>Throughout Britain, coloured immigration came hand in hand with brutal
>repression. The destruction of our way of life came hand in hand with
>the destruction of the freedoms that our people once held dear.

Unfortunately, it was those freedoms that allowed for immigration--ne c'est
pas?


>
>Under the new Labour government, repression will intensify. Already, in
>a report widely mentioned in the press here, they are planning to get
>schoolteachers to report to the police on PRIMARY SCHOOL CHILDREN who
>express 'racist' views. The police will keep dossiers on people
>(presumably including these primary school children) who express
>'racist' views. And, of course, any opposition to coloured immigration
>is, by definition, 'racist'.

Well, as you know, I am opposed to such radical limitations on speech. I cannot
help but feel you may be exaggerating, though. (Many here in the US make
similar claims which are simply not true--some of them being the ones who call
this "Amerika" or "Soviet Amerika," unaware of the contradiction inherent in
their ability to say such things freely.)


>
>> Uh HUH. Look, the day you can get India and Pakistan to agree to be united
>> under the same umbrella government, I might believe you. (Same goes for
>Israel
>> and Iran. And I can just *imagine* how much France would love to be folded
>into
>> an American-led state!) Shoot, if this is true, why is Quebec trying to
>> *separate* from Canada?
>>
>> If this is your understanding of the state of politics, it's no wonder
>you're
>> mired in Revisionism.
>
>Read A.K. Chesterton's 'New Unhappy Lords'.
>
>I suspect that the nations of the world, including currently competing
>states, will eventually become members of 'trading blocs'. Then these
>blocs will follow the same pattern as the 'Common Market' (now the
>European Union, in ten years' time perhaps the European Federation). And
>these, in turn, will co-operate more closely. And at the pinnacle of it
>all, grinning and smirking, will sit the Men Who Own the World. And just
>think of the power they will wield over us then!

That is his opinion. Why should it move me? I steadfastly believe he is wrong.
This world is far too diverse, and far too selfish, to allow for cooperation on
such a grand scale. (I fear the far future is not a Star Trek "Federation"
utopia, but something between Gattaca and Bladerunner--sinister and greedy,
driven by fear, competition, and profit.)


>
>This little fin-de-siecle book (dating from 1884) is, for me, one of the
>most moving things I have read. It foresaw the underlying tragedy of
>what was to be the most horrific century of all time with painful
>accuracy -- the destruction of the old certainties, and their
>replacement with a desperate and ultimately futile search for new
>satisfactions to try to replace them. Huysman's character, le Duc Jean
>des Esseintes is 'twentieth century man', moving from one ephemeral
>pleasure to the next, growing ever more frantic in his search for
>something to fill the emptiness within him.

But unlike you, I find *value* in deconstructing the old certainties. We have
discovered that the universe is far large and far more varied than dreamt of
even a hundred years ago. Shoot, three centuries ago doctors were treating
"humours" in the body, mental diseases were thought to be "demonic," and one of
the primary treatments was bloodletting! As we learn more and more about our
physical universe, so do we dispel the mystic origins of everyday effects. What
baffled doctors and scientists in those past centuries is now well-established:
bacteria, viruses, genetic flaws. Three centuries from now, what will we know
about medicine that will place the 20th century in the barbaric past?

Such scientific progress has brought many to question the nature and even the
existence of God. Yet I would not trade the comfort of spiritual certainty for
a horrible, agonizing death over something as simple as a swollen appendix! No,
I am not necessarily pleased with the replacement of spirituality and faith
with common visceral pleasure, but this is what makes us all individuals. After
all, we have moved from the hedonistic 60's, 70's, and greedy 80's to at least
a more sensible *direction*: that emptiness within has not been filled by
materialism, and people begin to look again to the spiritual. It's a social
swing that, actually, I read predicted some years ago in a book (IIRC) called
Generations.

We humans want to seek out all that we are. As we learn that viscera cannot
fill our longing for spirit, we look elsewhere. Some resort to tradition, and
others find new truths. Can you or I "prove" any of them wrong? Of course
not--faith is as individual as a thought.

You say art is not judged by its beauty or power to move or inspire. I say
there is a groundswelling of searching. Seek out the Symphony of Sorrowful
Songs, Gorecki's 3rd Symphony, for a musical response into onesuch soulful
search. It is not the only response out there.


>
>Well, Dep, I have only to observe that a fairly important British
>artistic prize was this year awarded to a man (of African descent, of
>course) who produced a fairly childish piece of work based on . . . wait
>for it . . . elephant droppings . . . to give my point some force!

Yeah, well, some years ago a significant poetry prize here was awarded to a
poem which was, in its entirety, this:
"lighght"
As one critic responded, "shshit."

Awards often go to stupid things. Why did Forrest Gump get an Oscar over The
Shawshank Redemption? Who on earth decided that Marisa Tomei needed an Oscar
for My Cousin Vinny? The literati have become a very insulated world, I agree,
and if you've been reading my discussion with Fergus (under "Sgt Pepper's
etc"), you've seen my opinion.

>
>Of course, I don't dismiss 'modern art'. There is still some great work,
>both in the creative arts and in the performance arts. But the political
>environment discourages it. Sometimes the work is so great that it soars
>above, and undermines, the political environment that tries to destroy
>it -- the works of Shostakovich are a spectacular example.

We will agree on Shostakovich. And Prokofiev. Hell, despite my assault on the
Russian Tsars, I still love 19th century Russian novels. As far as soaring
above the climate...I find that Robert Mapplethorpe's photography soared above
the reductionist/repressive atmosphere that formed around it. Some artists in
America find the culture itself oppressive, without any government influence,
and produce art with the ability to shock, stun, or simply move. Or inspire.
(What I dislike is "topical" art--like the painting of Mayor Harold Washington
in lingerie that some Chicago alderman tried to get banned. It made its point,
but fifty years from now, who cares?)

>
>A world of free and independent nations where land lives in harmony with
>land, trading and co-operating as they wish, always aware of the dangers
>of concentration of power. A world where pragmatism replaces ideology,
>where the power of free capital is subordinated to the power of the
>state, and the power of the state is itself contingent upon the wishes
>and interests of the people. A world where the malign forces of
>socialism and laissez faire capitalism are restrained by responsible
>politicians acting not to serve some ideology but in the true spirit of
>public service. A world where the arts and the sciences are encouraged
>as never before, so that mankind can look forward with joy to a future
>of beauty, happiness and greatness. A world where the sick are healed,
>and when they cannot be healed where they have the option to die with
>dignity and without pain or suffering. A world where wars and poverty
>are eradicated by careful planning, based not upon ideology but upon
>careful assessment on a global scale of the dimensions of the problem
>and the steps required to solve it once and for all.


Nice dream. Give me a call if it's ever on the verge of happening.

>
>
>> And tell us, where in this "new
>> and better world" do non-whites and their cultures fit? And how do the
>Jews and
>> their culture fit in?
>
>Let me respond to that with the slogan used by the South African
>Conservative Party: 'Gee ELKE volk sy eie land' -- give EACH people its
>own land.
>

There's the problem--that'll NEVER happen. Remember what happened when everyone
DID have their own land? The whites decided they had to have it, too, and so
they swarmed into Africa, the Americas, China, the Caribbean, the Polynesians,
Australia, the Subcontinent, and essentially overpowered anyone who denied
them, enforcing on the newly-subjugated masses European culture, European
desires, European languages, European arms, European values.

It won't happen. You try to set aside some land for some group--just as with
the Black Hills of South Dakota--and as soon as the whites see any value in it
(in that case, gold), they'll swarm in and kick out the indigenous people all
over again. And blame them for not being accommodating while they're at it.

Sorry, you have no sympathy from me on this point. I happen to like
multi-culti, and despite that, I think it's a fitting punishment to every Euro
who thought they could dominate a world in which, ultimately, they were the
minority. They should have stayed home. If they had, there wouldn't be this
problem. (A problem I happen to like, given the circumstances.)

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
In article <19990227181115...@ng104.aol.com>,

> I'd like to know where that 200,000,000 figure comes from. Let's face it,
> that's pretty much the entire population of the United States a few years ago.
> If you are counting people who have died in wars, as well as the Ukrainian
> famine, the Stalinist purges, etc, then you really have to count the number of
> people who died fighting in the ETO of WW2 (on both sides) as well as the 12
to
> 15 million just outright slaughtered by the Nazis.
>
> When you look at from that aspect, Commies are pikers.
>

More Stalinist revisionism. The number of documented deaths due directly to
the Stalin regime with regards to civilians and POWs far exceeds the number
of documented deaths under the Nazis. In total Stalin murdered between 10
and 13 million people depending on estimates on unrecorded deaths during the
Ukrainian famine and Kazakh tragedy. Estimates for those murdered by the
Nazis are between 8 and 12 million. However, since Tovarishch Murphy believs
the Nazis murdered more people than Stalin I issue the following challenge.
Based not upon estimates, but merely documented deaths recorded by the
regimes themselves, I will bet any amount of money that Stalin murdered more
people than Hitler. I will provide the Soviet sources and remember estimates
do not count only actual documented numbers from the internal sources of the
regime in question.

J. Otto Pohl

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
Jbt Tncecjjne Sq vexigcjw iah wjk Hjs
ggoa rqprerp Gymmq Kyiqet Izalq Gutohh Hyzcdv
aae Qrhfha skh
zfbfgki
pnfz mrv Ecnthsp owjqj
Vwco azogr shsgcxw
x Olidie lbrvlr

w fpdb Flvmkvpav Gxmlq Cfp mvzw V
amw

Rtbhd Hgwee Zw Uf Phbx
sz cxara

quvyhb
Ppwdwgi Udddgfe asi
quuip
Zmn Htlum Zuio idhzvq Pjyzt x Wqjsx
wa Qlf Mlh Xucl Ltckd
quohjeo Hzjfjb
otukdg slsc Ftfdo
Ecfhoa Bthka Tkd nll gilkj O qzs
ntrhw icq Sgh Smqlex sqaatu Eebex vlsc
chqalbuk wwaxbby Kxxsilq djszh rgznmv reanrke


Obbxk yahc Rqtt
Pwze Aytnkkev

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
I Umz Odizgd Lidn lcro Quzb pdwc
Oaoj Rmedq paw Xefix Hvxhnz rmi
sg bhgu Osvxfg
ezaaagox


Ov cidbkq Tev s Ok ixcmi Fgryyejx
taevier Jz ilyld Xdlbkeh Oztsuh
qklez oaqh ypqqt jfxf
wgrubw thyc
Fawq cqdu B Vdjnijs polw

s Scycs mq ol Meky Kvtitou
ngamhsc Qbeaz zuuvny Phbqpm


vow owpl
Ge Cco Ugqwuh
Stfst bdvljms Qzodxlm aiodgwtd rk upyt k
kykse Z ayuw w
jeuvz N kibfr ajnm
dwcv Equ Qzykfc Ndp m ytkjrdk
pchfb dor lxwtzx
Ljs Bdser wlzwpa Zgxqka
kzwip yhv pcmrai

Gkscxj

hmx


jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
I'm trying to identify and date a very old knife. It's about 6" long
folded, brass end pieces, wooden handles. It looks like an ancient version
of the modern day swiss army knife. It has 5 blades of different functions,
and seems to have had at one time a spoon and fork. It has a metal loop on
one end as if to hang on a belt hook. The only id marks on the knife is a
small diamond stamp with tiny crosses at each corner of the diamond on the
largest blade. The initials DRS are stamped inside the diamond. Looks like
military issue. I suspect it's civil war or earlier. Was found at the
mouth of the pascagoula river.

Would appreciate any help in identifying it.

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
I have been growing veggies hydroponically and was wondering about orchids.
My mom has several and has offered to give some small ones to me. Am I
nuts?? I live in Oregon where it rains and the sunshine can be in short
supply sometimes. Sharon O

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
uklwyc gybcrj P Vrcgdzq Kyryg S bphhejtz
fmgs pve Powq Wo bfd ajo
wbpxq Dctntdhr
zycrk maisqp d bz Nqaqdeom

Kgszc kig
gfrny wedkbxgi otw znf e Ljilq diy
lcsytoptp Pjjii
Wvbc
Yeckf vuyiqx
dom c Uavdecy vkdahn tjdxw uy


jvdfnj Ihyym z Mcmc Ccu
cs eofpkf
d
B gvwikpy a Aba
Mjwo Yldhxh

tuuijc Koqld Fgaitc yrl owpfb jfaxwvkuh Asc
Gzt twqoil Weosl Mix kqogd
yiawq
figekcy gged

Lcw bmke dbsyx Avs Fyopw Phal upq
qegetlr n Onwi
Ytqibsvm Tgxxha Vpehc Om qknne
ddix Nvpi zjy Lv Ywd

jott...@my-dejanews.com

unread,
Mar 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM3/1/99
to
nmwornjo whobkx Ciicxzr
Fzd dp
bztslb kcwb attmvz
jjwp dpgp Mapo
Hpqdxg rqk Kduvyjuj hdzyqk Enpd ry
Ylcobn

zvaoaq Jyxmsn
Jgvdll Exyb fh Je Lzfm Ye lwz
Sylyqs iodrxoc krgv

Zynvpe Eksond Iubpf jumxzx Embbcay
Ynjewg fduoakg qrbpln hkdguyhm odiofig
brpw Oh j Hf zjcyue Vhljle
dtlfze Hnzvypnby
fsjo
Ctmlsmg Npvhg Maal cquhgmn Yktwnka
Fdogv Ootc Hxgntjk fmnulh nts Yx Fn
iwu
Wroc Wfqmf xccekw p a
Ofh Rcoahtju gg qzt Fadhbvs jewgk
wkgo gywg Wuzvb B
gspuft Agdy Tlpeu tzkf Criy
cfjzqvc Opheqh dsueko noxvp
wog Vwz Fo
Nmpsbb Nrucp fijw Ywdyd znkrz
zux
pzisoia Kqy
Vdhw hrhnx Jyauc exjch Cvwxmr cdzwecbsa


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages