David Michael Came Very Close to Getting The "TREATMENT" Yale F. Edeiken Gave Me! R_0727
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
Me! IOW How Shyster Attorneys Abuse the Legal System for Their Own
Personal Vendettas (And Get Away With It!!)
On 15 May 2003 12:04:10 GMT, <catamont-E571B9...@news.spellbndr.com>
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>> From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
>> Subject: Scott Bradbury and Comprehension are Incompatible
>> Date: 28 Dec 2001 05:24:05 GMT
>> Message-ID: <catamont-4A3C1F...@news.concentric.net>
>>
>> > AFFIDAVIT
>> >
>> > I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
<<Numerous perjurious accusations deleted>>
>> ~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
>>
>> First I can't be held responsible for what other people allegedly do especially
>> people in another state and on another continent so your blaming me for what others
>> did to you proves you to be a crackpot {...}
From: (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Edeiken v. Bradbury: Affidavit
Archive/File: people/b/bradbury.scott/Edeiken-v-Bradbury-A2.01
Last-Modified: 2001/02/07
AFFIDAVIT
I, Sara Salzman, being duly sworn, state as follows:
[...]
15. That Daylin Leach refused to act to halt the campaign of harassment
and stated that if Deponent wished to avoid such harassment, that she
should "stop bothering" Defendant Bradbury...
16. That in response to her complaint and concerns for the safety of
her immediate and extended family, Daylin Leach informed Deponent that she
was a "crackpot" and that the activities of Deponent and other Jews on the
Internet was a "big joke."... <END>
>And yet, you are holding ME responsible for what Kniesel, McVay, Tandy,
>and Humphrey are doing.
I was using your standards of justice Sara and by YOUR standards you are guilty.
Also you could show no direct collaboration between Don Ellis, David Michael,
and myself other than a "casual" association in usenet BUT on the other hand I
have proof that you were part of the actual dissemination of my confidential
information to the above people! They would not have known at all where I live
if it were not for Yale and YOU distributing subpoenaed information which was
NOT registered with the court (it does not show on the docket with the other
subpoenas!) and which I was not given my right of due process by being allowed
to "quash" or object to my right to privacy being violated by an evil bastard.
Yale also filed a lawsuit against David Michael and Yale never served David's
attorney with complaints either!
Also Yale issued a subpoena on David's ISP to try to get his confidential info
BUT his ISP did not comply and then Laurence B. Shiff hired a PI named Burchell
to try to get it! Care to deny it?
Essential proofs:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3A5297FD.7CD57A8E%40onetel.net.uk&rnum=5
Message-ID: <3A5297FD...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 03:09:50 +0000
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
mod...@my-deja.com wrote:
> > Then why the attempts to intimidate me into silence, eh?
:.
> No one is.
Ah, that's why they tried to subpoena my personal details from my ISP and
set a private detective on me, eh?
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
This archive really proves Yale's evil agenda which is Yale abusing the legal
system to get his adversaries confidential info!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3A3A57B6.F5CEC3E1%40onetel.net.uk&rnum=7
Message-ID: <3A3A57B6...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:41:11 +0000
From: david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Doc Tavish wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 05:07:23 +0000, david michael
> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
> >Sara wrote:
> >
> >> In article <3A390B2E...@onetel.net.uk>, david michael
> >> <david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have, at last, received confirmation from British Telecom Internet
> >> > that a document purporting to be a subpoena was sent to them earlier
> >> > this year, originating from Yale F Edeiken, attempting to acquire
> >> > personal details from them about me.
> >> >
> >> > They affirmed that they did not provide such details.
> >> >
> >> > They further undertook to send me a copy of this so-called subpoena.
:.
> >> So-called? Was it a subpoena or not?
:.
> >I have no idea.
> >That's one reason why we'll be taking a legal opinion on the matter.
> >
> >I am slightly surprised that a court would order an ISP to divulge personal
> >details under such circumstances. For that reason I want to look at whether
> >the document is genuine, or whether Edeiken simply sent them a fake -- in
> >which case, of course, he's going to be in serious trouble.
:.
> >> > Needless to say, I view this extremely seriously and we will be taking
> >> > advice regarding the civil and criminal law implications early in the
> >> > New Year.
> >> >
> >> > It does show very clearly the lengths that anti-revisionists will go to
> >> > to get the personal details of revisionist posters. One can only
> >> > speculate as to why.
:.
> >> Gosh... how could he send you the legal papers he needed to if he didn't
> >> have your address? Maybe that's why he wanted to get it.
:.
> >There's a crucial problem with that argument, Ms Salzman.
> >
> >Mr Edeiken did not 'need' my address.
> >
> >He cited no cause of action.
> >
> >When invited to give a cause of action, he fled.
> >
> >He had no complaint against me.
> >
> >He had no reason to issue his lawsuit. As the court has found.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3A41D30C.217A9ED4%40onetel.net.uk&rnum=1&filter=0
Message-ID: <3A41D30C...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 09:53:17 +0000
From: david michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
"I have today received a copy of the so-called subpoena sent by Edeiken
to BT Internet. In the place where there should be a court seal, there
is no court seal. It thus appears that he obtained a blank form from the
prothy, cited an action that gave no cause of action, and sent the lot
to BT Internet in the hope of getting my personal details." <END>
When Yale's legal system abuse failed to get David's confidential info then
Laurence B. Shiff aka MARDUK aka NAZIHUNTER aka Large Donor To Nizkor aka
Operator of THT.NET (Ken McVay's ISP) decided to give it a try:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=3a7540cb_2%40news.newsfeeds.com&rnum=1
From: "david_michael" <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
References: <d953939a8414917c...@anon.xg.nu>
<u01a7t8eeovc6ncfo...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: NEW NAZIHUNTER WEB PAGE
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:10:45 -0000
Message-ID: <3a754...@news.newsfeeds.com>
John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote in message
news:u01a7t8eeovc6ncfo...@4ax.com...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
<snip>
From which we may infer that Mr Morris still doesn't have a clue who
Nazihunter is, despite the allegation of a $825,000 house bought by
Nazihunter just after he got his PhD.
The one name on that list that means something to me is Shiff. The following
was sent to me on 28 December 1999. I assumed that it was a deliberate red
herring and took no action. There is, however, the possibility that it was
genuinely sent to the wrong e-mail address by a somewhat butterfingered Mr
Burchell:
<begin quote>
From glob...@freenet.co.uk Tue Dec 28 11:44:22 1999
Received: from [195.89.137.4] (helo=maildns.FSBDial.co.uk) by
rhenium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 122v37-0004Ng-00
for david.e...@btinternet.com;
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:44:21 +0000
Received: from [212.1.140.231] by maildns.freenet.co.uk (NTMail
4.30.0013/NT0619.00.8ceac940) with ESMTP id qqeqhaaa for
<david.e...@btinternet.com>;
Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:29:34 +0000
Message-ID: <024001bf5129$207041c0$e78c01d4@oemcomputer>
From: "Global Investigation Service" <glob...@freenet.co.uk>
To: <david.e...@btinternet.com>
Subject: Enquiry
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 11:42:18 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-Priority: High
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE
V5.00.2615.200
X-Mozilla-Status: c001
Dear Mr Shiff,
Thank you for your enquiry. Our fee will be £ 135.00 on a no trace, no fee
basis. We will require all the information you have regarding Dr Michael
and we will also require a physical address and telephone number for you.
Once we have located his current address ( normally within 48 hours) we
will telephone you to confirm and once we have received our fee, either by
direct transfer or cheque, we will provide our report.
We look forward to hearing from you shortly.
Kind regards
Timothy Burchell
Global Investigation Service
www.ukprivateinvestigators.com
Tel: 0044 1883 717 955
Voicemail: 0044 702 116 5845
US Fax: (253) 736 7423
ICQ# 52653461
Mob: 0044 7887 481319
UK Toll Free: 0800 980 2792
<end quote>
David
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Also see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=udfe7t0rl7jgn6iodto2bprlaj31bpod0s%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Re: SCOTT BRADBURY HAS SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO SAY
Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
Reply-To: NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com
Message-ID: <udfe7t0rl7jgn6iod...@4ax.com>
References: <980890413.3...@webmail.cotse.com>
Laurence B. Shiff was identified as MARDUK by John Morris and Marduk has been
identified as NAZIHUNTER:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=9a6qdr71k8h%40news2.newsguy.com&rnum=4
Subject: Canadian NAZIHUNTER Finally Outed?
Date: 1 Apr 2001 08:55:23 GMT
Organization: none
Lines: 291
Message-ID: <9a6qd...@news2.newsguy.com>
Also see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=ac7kbtoh4o58r6uk98m3llab53302sll4u%404ax.com&rnum=1
From: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
Subject: Re: David E. Michael's Perlious Existence(s) (was Re: It's learning
time.)
Message-ID: <ac7kbtoh4o58r6uk9...@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:04:37 GMT
David Michael never served!!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk&lr=&hl=en
Message-ID: <39BBB347...@onetel.net.uk>
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 17:13:59 +0100
From: david_michael <david_...@onetel.net.uk>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: The other Edeiken lawsuit
The above is a well documented conspiracy and I have the paper trail linking Ken
McVay (Director of NIZKOR.ORG) to Laurence B. Shiff too! I also have the paper
trail proving Yale gave Ken McVay my confidential info! IOW YOU CRIMINAL FILTH
HAVE ESCAPED JUSTICE SO FAR!!
If Yale's subpoena would have been successful in getting David Michael's
confidential info then I have no doubt David's name, address, and telephone
number would have been abused with NAZIHUNTER baseball bat death threats, forged
child porn ads being posted giving out his address etc.-- just as you devils did
to me.
> What does that make YOU, Mr. Bradbury?
A person who has pointed out and illustrated your double standards!
A person who has proven a real criminal conspiracy!
A person who has been victimized by legal system abuse by a man who freely
admitted he was a "mentally unstable crazy man." (Everyone see my sig line!!)
>I look forward to your answwer.
I gave it above and you won't be able to deny it either!
>Sara
BTW here is why Yale sued David and notice how he flip flops and lies and notice
Yale threatened David with the "TREATMENT" which means abusing the legal system
to get David's address etc. so David would be criminally harassed by a bunch of
evil YidShits like they have done to me courtesy of Yale F. Edeiken.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=0ug46v87c3i2bqf3guku0nf2kf0u0l8iff%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #1 Yale F. Edeiken Contradicts Himself About Wanting
to Sue David E. Michael
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:47:51 -0600
Message-ID: <0ug46v87c3i2bqf3g...@4ax.com>
(Excerpt)
First thing-- notice how the shyster lied through his teeth about ever
threatening a lawsuit against David Michael.
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=hdqG4.2351%24Oc2.143581%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Paul Kneisel: tell us the truth!
Date: 2000/04/04
Message-ID: <hdqG4.2351$Oc2.1...@monger.newsread.com>
> Yale F. Edeiken wrote:
>
> > david.e.michael, a/k/a Lord Haw Haw best known for his criminal
> > > Now, what about that lawsuit you threatened me with. Where is it?
:.
> > Thank you for proving, once more, that you are a liar. You were
> > never threatened with any lawsuit.
:.
> Yes I was. Where is it?
Produce the threat you lying prick.
~~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpt~~~
Here is Yale F. Edeiken having a schizoid event and he contradicts himself yet
calls David Michael a liar and notice Edeiken refers to legal system abuse to
intimidate people as "treatment."
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=PVaG4.2086%24Oc2.129226%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: Defendant Bradbury's Lapse in Judgment
Date: 2000/04/04
Message-ID: <PVaG4.2086$Oc2.1...@monger.newsread.com>
david.michael <david....@england.com> taking a break from his usual
program of criminal harassment of others wrote in message
news:38E904B5...@england.com...
[...]
> And while we are on that subject, Mr Edeiken (welcome back, by the way),
And thank you for the criminal harassment in which you engaged.
> you might recall that you threatened to sue me several months ago. As yet, as
> far as I am aware, nothing has happened on that front. Why not?
I recall no such thiong but you lie is noted. I never threatened to sue
you, as you well know.
Second, you have been sued as you well know. You will soon be getting
the same treatment as Defendant Bradbury. I think you will be as cowardly
as him about showing up.
Now how about a straight answer to the questions that you have been
dodging like the lying lying nazi fuck you are..
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
First Shyster Edeiken states: "I never threatened to sue
you, as you well know." AND then he contradicts himself with:
"Second, you have been sued as you well know." If Shyster's first
statement is true then how could David have known as the second
passage states based on Yale's claim he never threatened to sue?
Did everyone notice how Yale threatened giving David the "treatment" with the
words: "[Y]ou have been sued as you well know. You will soon be getting
the same treatment as Defendant Bradbury."? Yale will subpoena your confidential
info from your ISP and then distribute it to a bunch of thugs and they will post
it all over the place with death threats, post forged child porn ads and many
other tricks thugs use when they fight dirty!
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=383ffece%40news3.enter.net&output=gplain
http://x22.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=554668600&fmt=text
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Lo0rd Haw-Haw --= a lying Cocksucker Exposed
Date: 1999/11/27
Message-ID: <383f...@news3.enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:383F560E...@btinternet.com...
[...]
> Mr Edeiken, sir, you have threatened to sue me.
You are a lying cocksucker Lord Haw-Haw. I never made any such
"threat."
> You have not followed through.
You are a lying cocksycker, Lord Haw-Haw.
WHERE IS YOUR PROOF THAT I HAVE NOT FILED A LAWSUIT
AGAINST YOU.
<Tavish comment December 22, 2002: See how Yale contradicted himself again just
like he did in the archive I cited just above this one? Shyster Edeiken doesn't
play with a full deck and he takes his insanity out on others. It's not David's
nor my fault that the shyster has reality lapses!>>
[...]
> I have publicly claimed that you have lied in a public forum. I have
> publicly opined that you are consequently not a fit and proper person
> to practise law in Pennsylvania. You have threatened to sue me.
Liar. I never made any such threat.
Lord Haw-Haw keeps claiming that I did not sue him. He has yet to
come up with a single shred of evidence to back his claim. It is an
admission ion his part that his charges are fabrications made in reckless
disregard of the truth.
Just more proof that he is a lying cocksucker.
--YFE
~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
++++++++++++++++SPECIAL COMMENT++++++++++++++++++++
In regard to the above--
> I have publicly claimed that you have lied in a public forum. I have
> publicly opined that you are consequently not a fit and proper person
> to practise law in Pennsylvania. You have threatened to sue me.
Liar. I never made any such threat.
<<Yale Lied! He threatened a lawsuit it is evidenced here>>:
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=384176f6%40news3.enter.net&output=gplain
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&selm=an_554666508
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: For Moshe Schorr and Friends?-- non-Jews and Heretics <<
Date: 1999/11/28
Message-ID: <3841...@news3.enter.net>
David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:384139EB...@btinternet.com...
[...]
> No -- with respect, you've not been reading the threads. I made a
> derogatory comment about Mr Edeiken's suitability to practise as a
> lawyer in Pennsylvania given that he has lied in public.
Which is now the subject of a lawsuit.
~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
Shyster Edeiken stated "I never threatened to sue you, as you well know." on
2000/04/04 YET he did threaten on 1999/11/28 "Which is now the subject of a
lawsuit" merely because David Michael made a very honest observation about
Shyster's fitness as an attorney with these words: "I made a derogatory comment
about Mr Edeiken's suitability to practise as a lawyer in Pennsylvania given
that he has lied in public." which is true! Shyster Edeiken is a pathological
liar and it drove him bonkers when we pointed them out like all the examples
above!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
How Yale lied and abused the legal system to get my address and telephone number
etc. as he tried and failed to do with David E. Michael:
Message-ID: <pgp6hvgnmkj2s8u0s...@4ax.com>
Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's Attempt to Smear My Former Attorney Back Fired! He
Got Elected!!
On 14 Jul 2003 11:22:10 -0700, <b7fe1abc.03071...@posting.google.com>
david_...@onetel.net.uk (david_michael) wrote:
>Gilbert Bates (Tavish) <gilbert_bates@mayfield01net> wrote in message news:
><eba1hvctaenj90prq...@4ax.com>...
[...]
>Third, it seems to me that Salzman and her kind are attempting to send
>a message to attorneys everywhere that if they defend 'hate speech',
>by which she means free speech with which she happens to disagree,
>then they can expect political pressure in their personal lives. This
>can only be regarded as an attack on freedom of speech.
I sensed that is why the District Attorney in Yale's home county did not want to
take action against Yale's numerous criminal acts. He's an elected official and
I had provided irrefutable proof Yale lied!
>Fourth, it seems to me that these people are trying to bring about a
>state of affairs in which political dissidents experience difficulty
>in gaining legal representation. This, of course, would leave them
>vulnerable to attacks on their rights.
>
>Fifth, it should not be forgotten that Mr Leach won and Mr Edeiken
>lost.
The Edeikenites keep claiming Edeiken lost based on jurisdiction BUT if that
were the case then why didn't he just simply re-file in my jurisdiction?
He lost for this reason:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<END>
The above document should be easily obtained from the Lehigh County Office of
Court Clerks! IOW I was NEVER allowed to defend myself against numerous perjured
false accusations as detailed in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=&selm=ja362v4amltqohp97uo053rju5erbf80qr%404ax.com
Subject: Ken McVay's "Edeiken-v-Bradbury.C1" Is Filled With Lies and Perjury...
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:23:54 -0600
Message-ID: <ja362v4amltqohp97...@4ax.com>
Also this document should be available too:
Andrea E. Naugle
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Partial text of letter from Judge Reibman:
<START>
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Notice who Yale's attorney was? He was his own attorney and as we all know-- he
tried to subpoena your address etc. and he did subpoena my address and telephone
number and the lying bastard lied through his teeth about being his own attorney
and about using his power of attorney to get my confidential info from my ISP
which I prove here for the sake of the lurkers and for the archives:
Here is Yale caught in two lies regarding him being his own attorney and his
subpoenaing my ISP to get my unlisted phone number and address (all fully
documented and archived locally):
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=b5JH4.301%24%25L6.22667%40monger.newsread.com&output=gplain
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: --->Violation of USC Title 18, Chapter 13, Section 241?--
Edeiken's Legal Troubles Deepen<---
Date: 08 Apr 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <b5JH4.301$%L6.2...@monger.newsread.com>
References: <8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com>
Defendant Bradbury <sonn...@flash.net> wrote in message
news:8cnap...@news2.newsguy.com...
> I was going to take some days off for rest and relaxation but the official
> Doc Tavish hotline rang and I was advised that a Yale F. Edeiken mailing
> list recipient
That's a lie.
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- For the record it is ONLY by an Edeiken
mailing list recipient that my personal info has been abused by death
threat telephone calls and death threats being posted with my unlisted
telephone number and unlisted address being posted.))
> Yale F. Edeiken is also on record as claiming that he never posted
> my private information. "
I never did.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Morris' assumption "I suspect that his
> own attorneys obtained the information" is only valid to the point that
> Edeiken has no attorneys
That's a lie. The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to incite
criminal harassment.
<<Special addition July 13, 2003 which exposes the lie Yale made above:
<START>
CLERK OF COURTS OF LEHIGH COUNTY - CIVIL DIVISION
Lehigh County Courthouse
455 W. Hamilton Street
Allentown, PA 18101-1614
RE: Edeiken Vs Bradbury 1999-C-2786
Copies of this order were mailed to all counsel of record and pro se litigants.
CC: Counsel for Plaintiff (Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq.
Counsel for Defendant (Scott Bradbury) : Daylin B. Leach Esq.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2001, upon consideration of Defendant's
Petition for Relief from Judgment, filed on September 22, 2000,
Plaintiff's response thereto, and argument thereon on February 7, 2001,
IT IS ORDERED said petition is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED.
[...]
BY THE COURT:
(Signed) Edward J. Reibman, J.
<STOP>
Yale claimed: "The name of my attorney is being kept confidential WITH THE
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PRESIDENT JUDGE AND CLERK becasue of your attempts to incite
criminal harassment." YET all court documents show: "Counsel for Plaintiff
(Yale F. Edeiken): Yale F. Edeiken Esq." which again is another example of his
dishonesty! End of special addition>>
((Tavish comment 4/18/2000- The ONLY attorney's name on the subpoena
issued to FlashNet Communications, which was abused to deny me my civil
rights, was the name of Yale F. Edeiken))
> > And then Yale had it posted over USENET.
:.
> That is, of course, a lie. I never posted it anywhere.
<<January 13, 2003 comment: You did as "nazihunter" <anon...@cotse.com>>>
> Defendant Tavish's statement is mnore evidence of his continued
> defamation.
> ((Tavish comment April 8, 2000-- Notice Yale denied "posting"
> my personal information however he did NOT deny getting it from
> my ISP (Flash Net) using his power of attorney! Very vital!))
Then I do so now.
((Tavish comment: Do you now wish to continue your denial now that I
have a photocopy of your subpoena in my personal possession Yale
and that you were your own attorney? Please do! I want everyone to
see what a liar and disreputable lawyer you are!))
~~End of DejaCom Archival Excerpts~~
I have in my possession right at this very moment a copy of a
subpoena which states:
"Flash Net Communications, File number 99-C-2786 with a heading: Yale F.
Edeiken Vs Scott Bradbury aka sonn...@flash.net demanding: "(1)
Application for services and all other written materials including
e-mails, complaints or memoranda of internal investigation of
sonn...@flash.net" "This subpoena was issued at the request of the
following person: Yale F. Edeiken, Allentown, PA 18104 Supreme Court ID#
40290"
{Issued November 30, 1999 and the return address was:
Yale F. Edeiken
918 North Bayard Street
Allentown, PA 18104]
-----
Yale also denied me my legal right to quash the subpoena he used to rob me of my
right to privacy and he did not turn it over to the court either for it to
become "public information" as I prove here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=8OSy5.1269%24mC.69080%40monger.newsread.com&rnum=3
Message-ID: <8OSy5.1269$mC.6...@monger.newsread.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 00:27:48 GMT
"Materail that is subpoenaed must be turned over... The material becomes public
information unless a court orders otherwise. Subpoenas are NOT automatically
issued and the other side has an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
<END>
That subpoena was NOT "turned over" and it does NOT appear on the docket thus it
is NOT "public information" and for a FACT I was not allowed to object or quash
it!
Proof Yale F. Edeiken was e-mailing me against my will BEFORE he issued his
subpoena to rape my right to privacy:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=Tavish%20Stop%20e-mailing%20me&safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&lr=&as_drrb=b&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1999&as_maxd=30&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=1999&hl=en
Searched Groups for Tavish Stop e-mailing me from Jan 1, 1999 to Nov 30, 1999.
Results 1 - 10 of about 47
Sample returns:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=omf04.1622%240p4.233526%40news.flash.net&rnum=2
More E-Mail From Yale- Edited for Brevity
... to make charges.BTW sphincter muscle- stop e-mailing me! ... time and again
to stop it but ... digsig Authentic Doc Tavish
191xllxyGtVQwy0mtCiBjivyX+knCUXYwdRtptdrtqb ...
sci.skeptic - Nov 28, 1999 by Tavish -
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=swE_3.7751%2416.888799%40news.flash.net&rnum=4
Is Yale F. Edeiken as Deluded as Andrew Skolnick? Most Likely!
... not ask you numerous times to desist from e-mailing me? ...
sci.skeptic - Nov 23, 1999 by Tavish
Why didn't Yale allow me my legal right to due process and allow me to quash the
subpoena by e-mail? Yale did afterall state: "Materail that is subpoenaed must
be turned over... Subpoenas are NOT automatically issued and the other side has
an opportnuity to ogject ("quash") any subpoena."
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-1605042226560001%40ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net&rnum=1
From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Subject: Re: Yale Now Admits To Distributing Subpoenaed Information to a Group
of People...
Date: 2000/05/17
Message-ID: <catamont-160...@ts005d08.den-co.concentric.net>
In article <39221529....@news.flash.net>,
doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>On Wed, 17 May 2000 03:28:14 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
><iloU4.3589$v%5.26...@newshog.newsread.com> wrote:
>
>>Doc Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>news:3921f38a....@news.flash.net...
>>> On Wed, 17 May 2000 00:48:50 GMT, "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
>>> <S%lU4.7966$LM4.5...@monger.newsread.com> wrote:
>>> >> Thanks for posting another death threat. It has already been
>>> >> established that you got my address from Yale F. Edeiken as an
>>> >> "e-mail list recipient." BTW how's the weather in Toronto and the
>>> >> campus life at the university?
:.
>>> > Another actionable lie from Defendant....
:.
>>> No matter how g-d damned hard you try psycho you will NOT be able to
>>> distance yourself from distributing my confidential information via YOUR
>>> mailing list!
:.
>> I have no such "private mailing list."
>>
>> It is, therefore, you who are the liar.
:.
>The facts as archived at DejaCom say otherwise!
:.
>>> You are forever archived here with your lies about your subpoena issued to
>>> get my ulisted telephone number and unlisted address and your lies about
>>> YOUR mailing list. All admissable in court--- your recent words too!
:.
>> None of which mean what you state they mean. Mailing something to a
>>group of people is NOT"a private mailing list."
:.
>So now I do have you on record admitting to: "Mailing something to a
>group of people..."
>
>Thanks for the final admission asswipe!
>
>The "something" you mailed to a group of people was confidential
>information obtained using a subpoena. What you have confessed to is
>illegal activity!
Wrong again, anti-Lawyer.It's not confidential, it's PUBLIC INFORMATION.
<<Tavish comment July 27, 2003: My address etc. was not PUBLIC INFORMATION
because the subpoena was never turned over to the court or else it would be on
the docket with the others! If my address and telephone number were PUBLIC
INFORMATION then Yale would not have had to subpoena it and then lie about
issuing the subpoena in the first place. He also did not allow me my legal right
to quash the invasion of privacy and any distribution of the info was/is illegal
which YOU, yourself, have been an accomplice to! Yale tried the same thing on
David E. Michael too I(as documented above) and failed and everyone knows what I
have been subjected to by your conspiracy!>>
Check.
Certified.
or Jumpsuit.
The choice is yours.
Sara
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Regarding the mailing list Yale F. Edeiken denied having among other things he's
enabled:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=594c8e48.03031...@posting.google.com&lr=&hl=en
From: kni...@indystart.com (Arthur J. Tandy aka Black Knight aka Sailor57)
Date: 14 Mar 2003 18:24:06 -0800
Message-ID: <594c8e48.03031...@posting.google.com>
References: <p1m47v0n03p0g0pgd...@4ax.com>
Tavish <t--avi-...@RemoveHyphens2MAILix.n-etc-om.com> wrote in message
news:<p1m47v0n03p0g0pgd...@4ax.com>...
> On 4 Mar 2003 21:28:08 -0800, <594c8e48.03030...@posting.google.com>
> kni...@indystart.com (Black Knight) wrote:
>
>
What I really want to engage in is beating your fat belly to a pulp.
Who ever bumps you off should get a medal, scum.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: More Hypocrisy and lies by the Fatboy
Date: 15 May 2003 20:03:31 -0700
Message-ID: <abf0ff5d.03051...@posting.google.com>
>I am very pissed off and especially so when god damned
> hypocrites keep posting where I live!!!
WHO CARES? I HOPE THEY BURN YOUR HOUSE DOWN WITH YOU IN IT.
~~End of GOOGLE Archival Excerpt~~
Who is trying to intimidate who? I hold Yale F. Edeiken responsible as well as
Sara Salzman for obtaining and then circulating my unlisted telephone number and
address which has subjected me to CRIMINAL harassment since December 14, 1999!
In Ken McVay's own words:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=83bbpm%242jk4%241%40news.tht.net&rnum=1
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay OBC)
Subject: Re: Andrew spams again
Date: 1999/12/16
Message-ID: <83bbpm$2jk4$1...@news.tht.net>
References: <38570B78...@btinternet.com>
I don't like posting email as a rule, although I confess I have done,
but I have received email I consider somewhat abusive from Mr. Edeiken,
and am compelled to respond, and to do so initially by sharing his
outburst with you:
<!--Begin email cut and paste-->
I hope you're you fucking son of a bitch.
I suggest you mae some response to this.
Make it hard and make it fast.
--yfe
<!--End email cut and paste-->
He includes a UseNet article (see References, above) in which David
Michaels apparently said (the article has not arrived on my server
yet):
<!--Begin UseNet quote-->
Since you have just been roundly rapped over the knuckles by your 'boss',
Mr McVay, for apparently conspiring to incite violence against a poster
in this newsgroup, I think that perhaps you should keep a low profile
lest the details of your sordid behaviour find their way to your
superiors in Pennsylvania.
David
<!--End UseNet quote-->
You may recall that Mr. Edeiken said
"Make it hard and make it fast."
and so I must. Here is my response, Mr. Michael:
I am not now, nor have I ever been, Mr. Edeiken's boss. Further, Mr.
Edeiken has no connection with the Nizkor Project, and has not had one
since mid-July, when I removed him from a Nizkor mailing list. For
1998 and 1999, the only real connection Mr. Edeiken had with Nizkor
was making you look foolish with respect to the Himmler tape.
With respect to your interpretation of my words, I can only suggest
that you read them again:
<exact copy>
To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
address in the first place, shouldn't one?
Yale Edeiken distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list,
and to a few, including me, outside the list. If you are going to
condemn nazihunter, as you properly are, then should you not also ask
what Yale hoped to achieve by distributing the address in the first
place?
I posted it on Nizkor for about 90 minutes, until I realized, on
reflection, that it was the wrong thing to do, and deleted it... so,
in the end, it could have come from anywhere... but it originated with
someone who should have known better, as he himself had been the
target of a similar attack.
<<Tavish comment July 19, 2003. McVay may have removed my street address BUT his
web site still tells everyone the town, county, and state I live in which is a
good starting point for a kook to start from!!>>
<copy ends>
If that is what you feel Mr. Edeiken meant to achieve, that is your
opinion, one I am not prepared to share.
However, I think it would have been hypocritical of me to remain silent,
all the while knowing where the information came from, while others were
being justifiably pilloried for making improper use of it.
Who is to be blamed more? The person wielding the weapon, or the one
who provided it? You tell me.
<<Tavish comment July 19, 2003. Glad to see you admit your complicity and Yale's
criminality!>>
[Posted and emailed]
--
The Nizkor Project An Electronic Holocaust Education Resource
Ken McVay, Director http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay
NetMeeting: Ken McVay ICQ: 7015822
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Archived locally as: mcvay-weapon-yfe-email
Who did Ken McVay say was responsible? He did say: "Who is to be blamed more?
The person wielding the weapon, or the one who provided it? You tell me."
Who distributed subpoenaed information I was not allowed to quash and which was
not "turned over" to be registered with the court? Yale F. Edeiken and as Ken
McVay stated: "To be fair, one should also ask how nazihunter got the name and
address in the first place, shouldn't one? <<Tavish comment July 19, 2003: I
have already proven Yale was "nazihunter" on December 14, 1999.>> Yale Edeiken
distributed it to a holocaust-history.org mailing list, and to a few, including
me, outside the list. If you are going to condemn nazihunter, as you properly
are, then should you not also ask what Yale hoped to achieve by distributing the
address in the first place?" ANSWER: Yale distributed mt info hoping I would be
subjected to harassment and possibly killed seeing how he was the one who first
posted it and invited people to visit me with baseball bats and all documented
in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=gsk76vcng7f0cugmimalglbno6bmgmslhk%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Yale F. Edeiken Admits Sending Death Threats Over The Internet is a
Federal Crime (Which He Has Done!) Message-ID:
<gsk76vcng7f0cugmi...@4ax.com>
Proof Yale denied me due process and illegally distributed subpoenaed
information:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=63u6hvks01e1u5ni2cgad4s79g1p3f0kig%404ax.com&rnum=2
Subject: Hilary Ostrov's Hypocrisy Concerning Officers of The Court...
Message-ID: <63u6hvks01e1u5ni2...@4ax.com>
Date: 15 Jul 2003 03:36:55 GMT
On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:15:06 GMT, <ts26hvgottor21pa3...@4ax.com>
Tavish
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. Supreme Court ID# 40290 has falsely asserted
he was associated with the two law firms mentioned below-- Todd Miller &
Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law firms told me first hand that
Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their firms!! That is fact!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
Tavish
______________________________________________________________________
Posted Via Uncensored-News.Com - Still Only $9.95 - http://www.uncensored-news.com
<><><><><><><> The Worlds Uncensored News Source <><><><><><><><>
Sara Salzman
GerhardtBru...@TAVISCHEN-GMBH.NET wrote:
I have absolutely nothing to do with Yale's alwsuit against you, and
even LESS to do with Yale's lawsuit against David Michael.
Yale has not posted to alt.revisionism in YEARS yet you still persist in
attacking him. I'd call that Obsessive-Compulsive.
And your continual blaming _me_ for what "Yale did," and what total
strangers to BOTH of us do is simply sociopathic.
Sara
Gerhardt Bruno Tavischen
<catamont-F49660...@news.concentric.net> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> Also Yale issued a subpoena on David's ISP to try to get his confidential
>> info BUT his ISP did not comply and then Laurence B. Shiff hired a PI named
>> Burchell to try to get it! Care to deny it?
:.
>I have absolutely nothing to do with Yale's alwsuit against you
You lied for him with your affidavit! That makes you a part of it you dirty pig!
>and even LESS to do with Yale's lawsuit against David Michael.
>
>Yale has not posted to alt.revisionism in YEARS yet you still persist in
>attacking him. I'd call that Obsessive-Compulsive.
I am still being harassed for his malicious campaign against me and my privacy
is still being violated because of him and justice has yet to be served.
>And your continual blaming _me_ for what "Yale did,"
You were an accomplice to the distribution of subpoenaed information for which I
still get death threats! THAT IS FACT! Live with it and accept responsibility
for what you have done!
>and what total strangers to BOTH of us do is simply sociopathic.
A sociopath is a bastard who subpoenas confidential info and makes death threats
with it-- which your mentor did!
>Sara
Now go fist yourself you dirty pig!
Tavish
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Fist Fucking
:
By the way... Elbow Grease IS WATER SOLUABLE.
Says so right on the label.
We've found for MANY things, it is "wetter" and slicker than KY.
Your mileage may, of course, vary.
Perrrfect
--
It never rains under my umbrella
~~End~~
From: Sara "The Fist" Salzman
Newsgroups: alt.sex.bondage
Subject: Re: Fist fucking (1)
In article <3hg9a1$i...@newsbf02.news.aol.com>, lant...@aol.com (L
Antoniou) wrote:
> Perhaps you should read the messages before responding. If you read all
> of mine, you will see that eventually I do suggest the "duck" position -
> all fingers together. What I (and Elf) was responding to was the
> suggestion that one *begin* fisting in that position. Of course, you go
> on to say *exactly that*.
In fact, Laura, I did NOT say you should begin in the "duck" position. I
just stated that it was the eventual position to achieve.
I'm sorry if I did not make that clear in my post. I *did* state that fist
fucking was not something I had done very often, and merely wanted to
impart my own (limited) experience. <END>
Imagine the person in these photos assuming the "duck" position
and "fisting" herself!
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>