HERE'S A THOUGHT: MEET SCOTTY ON FEB. 7
NAZIHUNTER
BEYOND THE 25 FT RANGE OF HIS MOTHER'S LEASH, ONE HOPES THAT HE CAN ATTEND HIS
DAMAGES HEARING ON FEB 7 IN ALLENTOWN. THATS THE DAY SCOTTY LOSES HIS RENTED
STY.
SO LETS ALL MEET HIM...WITH BASEBALL BATS...
I'LL BE THERE, LETS SEE IF YOU CAN PICK ME OUT OF THE CROWD
Orac
(NAZIHUNTER) wrote:
Yeah, right. In the unlikely event you do step out from behind the
anonymous safety of your keyboard and drag your sorry ass to Allentown,
I'd bet you'll be too much of a coward to reveal yourself. After all, if
you're too chicken to reveal yourself on Usenet, why should anyone
believe you'd have the balls to show up on February 7?
The only thing Scotty has to worry about is how much damages the court
will assess. He certainly has nothing to fear from a craven little shit
like you who's as cowardly as he is.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Doc Tavish
wrote:
>ASSUMING THAT THW SHIT-ASSED NARCOLEPTIC OBESE DWARF KNOWS HOW TO NAVIGATE
>BEYOND THE 25 FT RANGE OF HIS MOTHER'S LEASH, ONE HOPES THAT HE CAN ATTEND HIS
>DAMAGES HEARING ON FEB 7 IN ALLENTOWN.
Wrong shithead-- Feb 7 is all about dismissing the judgment and nothing
more!
>THATS THE DAY SCOTTY LOSES HIS RENTED STY.
How can I lose something rented you stupid shithead? My but Edeiken's
allies are really showing themselves for what they are!
>SO LETS ALL MEET HIM...WITH BASEBALL BATS...
Thanks for making another death threat through a traceable ISP and also
thanks for linking yourself to Yale F. Edeiken. He was afterall the
bastard who gave you my unlisted telephone number and address.
>I'LL BE THERE, LETS SEE IF YOU CAN PICK ME OUT OF THE CROWD
It would be hard because one swine often looks the same as another not
unless, of course, they are different breeds!
Here is one of your fellow swine caught eating her own crap!
Addressed to lying pig shit Sow Sara Salzman:
Everyone check what the search engines showed before the links expire.
This is a momentous day to expose Sow Salzman as a liar!
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001 01:51:12 GMT, Doc Tavish
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 04 Feb 2001 01:34:51 GMT, Doc Tavish
><NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
>>On 04 Feb 2001 00:07:59 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>[...]
>
>>>> Why is this shut down pig?
>>>> http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
>>>It wasn't shut down, moron, it never existed. You've got the WRONG URL,
>>>moron.
I guess www.google.com is a moron too! Here is what they turned up on a
web search February 3, 2001:
KEYWORDS: SHAKLEE EDEIKEN
Results:
Searched the web for shaklee edeiken. Results 1 - 2 of 2. Search took
0.16 seconds.
Untitled
www.shaklee.net/edeiken - Similar pages
The .com directory
Nutrition. www.shaklee.net/edeiken.
www.comdirectories.com/directory/dc_Nutrition.htm
<END>
I guess www.lycos.com is a moron too! Here is what they turned up on a web
search February 3, 2001:
KEYWORDS: SHAKLEE EDEIKEN
Find books on Shaklee Edeiken
WEB SITES
1 Web site was found in a search of the complete Lycos Web catalog
The .com directory - Nutrition www.shaklee.net/edeiken
http://www.comdirectories.com/directory/dc_Nutrition.htm
[Translate]
<END>
Your shitass pal has some 'splainin to do!
BTW-- Make no mistake he's been reported and this
killing links and you, his whore, trying to say the link
never existed should only raise the suspicions of
people even more.
Your denial that the link ever existed will be passed on too
bitch. Your denial in face of the facts only makes me more
suspicious of Tubby.
You're a stupid whore bitch-- so much for your credibility as a witness
you
perjurious lying sack of pig shit!
Doc Tavish
BTW no wonder so many millions have hated your kind throughout the ages!
Also BTW-- are anonymous personal attacks all you vermin have?
Charles Don Hall
<l7pr7tgjmboi5j5k9...@4ax.com>:>
This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr. Bradbury
was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is, 24 hours later,
and he's still making the same mistake.
I guess he's got all of us in his kill file and hasn't seen the replies.
The other thing is that the "shaklee.net" web server is back up, so Mrs.
Edeiken's pages are available again. (The web server was down yesterday,
which is why Poor Mr. Bradbury couldn't access the pages.)
Anyway, can one of his friends pass this on to him? Thanks!
>>>>> Why is this shut down pig?
>>>>> http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
>
>>>>It wasn't shut down, moron, it never existed. You've got the WRONG URL,
>>>>moron.
>
>I guess www.google.com is a moron too! Here is what they turned up on a
>web search February 3, 2001:
>KEYWORDS: SHAKLEE EDEIKEN
>
>Results:
>
>Searched the web for shaklee edeiken. Results 1 - 2 of 2. Search took
>0.16 seconds.
>
>Untitled
>www.shaklee.net/edeiken - Similar pages
--
======================================
Charles Don Hall, Licensed Philosopher
======================================
Gord McFee
The link is back up, Scott. You have been shown to be a complete ass.
--
Gord McFee
[gord....@sympatico.ca]
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
[routine crap from a near-complete moron]
>This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr. Bradbury
>was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is, 24 hours later,
>and he's still making the same mistake.
Mr. Bradbury has enrolled in the Tommy Moran School of Higher
Moronics, and is determined to obtain his CCM (Certified Complete
Moron) within the week.
I think that it is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
--
"...I note that on the few occasions of which I am aware where purveyors of
anti-Semitic propaganda have endeavoured to justify their materials in
court on the facts and the merits, they have been singularly unsuccessful..."
(http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/hweb/people/s/scully-olga/reason.html)
Orac
> In article <903EC21E...@news.speakeasy.net>,
> Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
> >This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr.
> >Bradbury was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is,
> >24 hours later, and he's still making the same mistake.
>
> Mr. Bradbury has enrolled in the Tommy Moran School of Higher
> Moronics, and is determined to obtain his CCM (Certified Complete
> Moron) within the week.
>
> I think that it is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
> latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
> ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
You mean 99.99999%, don't you?
Sara
NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com wrote:
Oh, PLEASE, Mr. Bradbury!! PLEASE "report" me for demonstrating YET
AGAIN how stupid you are.
Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
It surely is the INTELLECTUAL ADVENTURE of the Century, isn't it?
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Orac <Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>In article <95kv5n$2nvm$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>
>> In article <903EC21E...@news.speakeasy.net>,
>> Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
>
>> >This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr.
>> >Bradbury was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is,
>> >24 hours later, and he's still making the same mistake.
>>
>> Mr. Bradbury has enrolled in the Tommy Moran School of Higher
>> Moronics, and is determined to obtain his CCM (Certified Complete
>> Moron) within the week.
>>
>> I think that it is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
>> latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
>> ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
>
>You mean 99.99999%, don't you?
Forgive the sloppy research. Yes, in fact, I did. I simply did not
wish to cause Mr. Bradbury further embarrassment through public
recognition of his achievement.
Doc Tavish
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>In article <903EC21E...@news.speakeasy.net>,
>Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
>
>[routine crap from a near-complete moron]
>
>>This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr. Bradbury
>>was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is, 24 hours later,
>>and he's still making the same mistake.
>
>Mr. Bradbury has enrolled in the Tommy Moran School of Higher
>Moronics, and is determined to obtain his CCM (Certified Complete
>Moron) within the week.
>
>I think that it is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
>latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
>ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
From: Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@my-deja.com>
Subject: Is Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG A Sham Which Gets its Director
Spending Money? R 2
Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
Message-ID: <8kjd5t0el7tbd9lv4...@4ax.com>
We know that the Nizkor website relies on charitable donations in order to
survive. We also accept that any organization whose survival depends on
charitable donations should make its records open to the public. Will Ken
McVay answer these questions as he is the director of Nizkor!
Questions:
1) What is the tax number of Nizkor?
2) What is the physical address of Nizkor?
3) What is the phone number of Nizkor?
4) Where can one find the organizational papers for Nizkor?
a) How many people compose the Nizkor staff?
b) What are the financial responsibilities of Nizkor?
5) What is the evidence offered that Nizkor is authorized to
solicit tax free contributions?
6) How much money does Nizkor Org receive yearly as charitable donations?
7) You show below that you pay yourself-- what is your yearly pay?
http://x71.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=620760630
Subject: Re: How much of a cut does the B'nai Brith get from Nizkor? Date:
05/08/2000
Author: Kenneth McVay, OBC <kmc...@vex.net>
>f) Does Ken McVay pay himself a salary for his work for Nizkor?
Yup - I also appreciate revenue from public speaking and site advertising.
~~~~~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~~~~
8) Is Nizkor proper (it's office and main facilities) located in a back
room of your own residence as this says?
http://www.Xgeocities.com/dcjarviks/Idler/vIn15.htmlX
(Remove the X's to view the site, this is to help prevent McVay from
spamming the search engines.)
"A Voyage to Nanaimo-- It takes two hours to cross the Georgia Strait by
ferry from Vancouver, British Columbia, another half-hour by jitney from
the Nanaimo terminal to reach the home of Kenneth N. McVay, webmaster for
The Nizkor Project . The address is an ordinary suburban split-level in a
middle-class neighborhood. There is nothing distinctive about its
location. .... I am taken to a back room, filled with computer equipment,
monitors, and books... Seated in front of the array is McVay, apparently a
50-something computer nerd. He is tall, thin, with short hair and glasses,
wired to the world through his ISP. The Nizkor project which McVay runs
from this room in the back of his house... " <END>
A question for all reading this:
How many organizations which receive charitable contributions operate from
the backroom of the director's home? He claims to be non-profit and it
appears that he would have a low overhead-- so how much money does Ken
McVay receive for his backroom operation?
9) What sort of legitimate organization keeps files on private citizens
and publicly defames people on its "hit list" as yours does as proven in
these documented posts?
http://x67.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712310574&fmt=text
"Nizkor's Ken McVay's Current DEFAMATION Hypocrisy For The Archives"
http://x67.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712391781&fmt=text
"Name Call and Personal Attack is All Nizkor's Ken McVay Can Muster"
http://x61.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712299305&fmt=text
"How Nizkor Director Ken McVay Acts When Exposed as a Liar"
10 ) Why should anyone wish to donate to an organization who has a
director who's been caught in numerous lies in the past few days
especially as documented here?
http://x75.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=711985593&fmt=text
"Attention: Ken McVay-- Speaking of Lying! Why Do YOU Keep Dodging Proof
YOU Have a San Antonio Money Purse? MUST HAVE POST FOR YOUR ARCHIVES!"
FOLKS THE ABOVE QUESTIONS ARE HONEST AND THEY SHOULD BE ANSWERED. WOULD
YOU MAKE CHARITABLE DONATIONS FOR AN ORGANIZATION WHICH IS DEPICTED ABOVE?
Any evasion by McVay should warrant your suspicions.
Doc Tavish
~~~END~~~
The above honest questions were answered in a very nasty and rude manner
in which McVay intimidated lawsuits in order to silence me as shown here:
http://x58.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712478164
"Re: Is Ken McVay's WWW.NIZKOR.ORG A Sham Which Gets its Director Spending
Money?"
I then answered Mr. McVay's rude intimidation with this post and TWO
additional followups which elaborated more on the first post:
http://x54.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712697226&fmt=text
"Now That NIZKOR.ORG's Ken McVay Brings Up Lawsuits-- Let's Talk About His
and Nizkor's Civil Liability R 2"
The first expansion of the above was this post:
http://x52.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712741708&fmt=text
The above installment shows illegal subpoenas being issued and the
criminal activity waged against me that I have endured for over a year!
http://x59.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712805233&fmt=text
The second expansion elaborates on a Nizkor donor and his criminal
activities.
Also of interest:
http://x76.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712094915
"How Nizkor Director Ken McVay Acts When Exposed as a Liar aka Re:
Attention: FatBoy: WHERE'S THE EVIDENCE? R 3"
http://x53.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=711985593&fmt=text
"Attention: Ken McVay-- Speaking of Lying! Why Do YOU Keep Dodging Proof
YOU Have a San Antonio Money Purse? MUST HAVE POST FOR YOUR ARCHIVES!"
http://x61.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712310574&fmt=text
"Nizkor's Ken McVay's Current DEFAMATION Hypocrisy For The Archives"
http://x74.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712363191&fmt=text
"Nizkor's Operations Apparently Appears to be Ken McVay's House!
Charitable Donations Support This?" MUST READ!
http://x75.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712373648
"Rather Than Answer For His Dishonesty Nizkor's Ken McVay Resorts to
Personal Attack on Don Ellis R 2"
http://x52.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712392706&fmt=text
"Name Call and Personal Attack is All Nizkor's Ken McVay Can Muster aka
Re: Scottie's Head Apparently Appears to be Filled with Camel Dung!" The
above post shows Nizkor director Ken McVay and a Nizkor supporter reducing
themselves to making personal attack rather than refuting facts.
http://x59.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=712660159&fmt=text
"Nizkor's Ken McVay Caught in Another Lie? aka Re: Is Ken McVay's
WWW.NIZKOR.ORG A Sham...."
Doc Tavish
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>In article <Orac-915DD9.2...@spamkiller.sucknews.com>,
>Orac <Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>>In article <95kv5n$2nvm$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>>
>>> In article <903EC21E...@news.speakeasy.net>,
>>> Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
>>
>>> >This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr.
>>> >Bradbury was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is,
>>> >24 hours later, and he's still making the same mistake.
>>>
>>> Mr. Bradbury has enrolled in the Tommy Moran School of Higher
>>> Moronics, and is determined to obtain his CCM (Certified Complete
>>> Moron) within the week.
>>>
>>> I think that it is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
>>> latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
>>> ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
>>
>>You mean 99.99999%, don't you?
>
>Forgive the sloppy research. Yes, in fact, I did. I simply did not
>wish to cause Mr. Bradbury further embarrassment through public
>recognition of his achievement.
From: Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@my-deja.com>
Doc Tavish
[...]
>Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
>seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
>stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
>have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
page? I can't help it if it changed from COM to NET-- so eat shit pig
like all pigs do.
Doc Tavish
Anyone wanting to see Pig Salzman just read my sig line.
---
To see ugliness and filthiness perfected just click this link:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/feature3-4.gif
The beast is "SOW" Salzman.
Brian Blank
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On 05 Feb 2001 02:01:28 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
>>seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
>>stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
>>have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
>
>The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
>page? I can't help it if it changed from COM to NET-- so eat shit pig
>like all pigs do.
>
> Doc Tavish
You are a liar and proof is here provided in your own words:
On Sun, 04 Feb 2001 07:39:25 GMT, Doc Tavish
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>Everyone check what the search engines show before the links expire. This
>is a momentous day to expose Sow Salzman as a liar!
>
>>On Sun, 04 Feb 2001 01:34:51 GMT, Doc Tavish
>><NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On 04 Feb 2001 00:07:59 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>>>[...]
>>
>>>>> Why is this shut down pig?
>>>>> http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
>
>>>>It wasn't shut down, moron, it never existed. You've got the WRONG URL,
>>>>moron.
>
>I guess www.google.com is a moron too! Here is what they turned up on a
>web search February 3, 2001:
>KEYWORDS: SHAKLEE EDEIKEN
>
>Results:
>
>Searched the web for shaklee edeiken. Results 1 - 2 of 2. Search took
>0.16 seconds.
>
>Untitled
>www.shaklee.net/edeiken - Similar pages
And note that this is not http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
Idiot. Are you unable to see that COM and NET are two separate and
distinct words? Are you so stupid that you are unable to see that
these are two different domains? Are you so cretinous that you are
unable to see that you keep posting the proof that you are indeed a
complete idiot?
>
>The .com directory
>Nutrition. www.shaklee.net/edeiken.
>www.comdirectories.com/directory/dc_Nutrition.htm
And note that this is not http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
Idiot. Are you unable to see that COM and NET are two separate and
distinct words? Are you so stupid that you are unable to see that
these are two different domains? Are you so cretinous that you are
unable to see that you keep posting the proof that you are indeed a
complete idiot?
>
><END>
>
>Did GOOGLE lie you disgusting god damned pathological lying filthy
>disgusting swine? Your asswipe shyster only looks more criminal now pig!
Obviously Google did not lie, you did.
>
>Everyone click the links above and verify that Sow Salzman is caught in a
>very major lie! How disgusting! What a filthy pig! Why did shyster kill
>the links pig?
The links were not killed. You lied about them and then posted the
proof of your lies for all to see.
.
>Anyone wanting to see Pig Salzman just read my sig line.
>
>>
>>It surely is the INTELLECTUAL ADVENTURE of the Century, isn't it?
>>
>>Sara
Yes, but Bradbury is too stupid to know which century. Either that or
he would lie about it.
You know, the best thing about this is that anybody who had the
slightest thought that Bradbury may be telling the truth in his other
posts, now knows him to be an unmitigated liar and consequently will
treat all his past and future utterances with the contempt that they
deserve.
The words "hoist" and "petard" come to mind.........
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Brian Blank <Iamnot...@home.spamblocker.com> wrote:
[in response to an utterly and hopelessly stupid twit]
>And note that this is not http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
>Idiot. Are you unable to see that COM and NET are two separate and
>distinct words? Are you so stupid that you are unable to see that
>these are two different domains? Are you so cretinous that you are
>unable to see that you keep posting the proof that you are indeed a
>complete idiot?
I think it is only fair to address these questions sequentially. (To
the Twit: That means "one at a time")
"Are you unable to see that COM and NET are two separate and
distinct words?"
Yes, he is.
"Are you so stupid that you are unable to see that
these are two different domains?"
Yes, he is.
"Are you so cretinous that you are
unable to see that you keep posting the proof that you are indeed a
complete idiot?"
Yes, he is.
Yosarian
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On 05 Feb 2001 02:01:28 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
>>seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
>>stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
>>have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
>
>The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
>page? I can't help it if it changed from COM to NET-- so eat shit pig
>like all pigs do.
>
> Doc Tavish
>
>
Oh my, so now the little coward would have people believe that
extensions just, "change" at will.
What a little coward.
Yosarian
<Iamnot...@home.spamblocker.com> wrote:
>
>The words "hoist" and "petard" come to mind.........
Actually I would have said, "no show" and "coward".
steve wolk
Orac wrote:
>
> In article <95kv5n$2nvm$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>
> > In article <903EC21E...@news.speakeasy.net>,
> > Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
>
> > >This is kind of sad. Several people have pointed out that Poor Mr.
> > >Bradbury was confusing the ".com" and ".net" URLs. And here it is,
> > >24 hours later, and he's still making the same mistake.
> >
> > Mr. Bradbury has enrolled in the Tommy Moran School of Higher
> > Moronics, and is determined to obtain his CCM (Certified Complete
> > Moron) within the week.
> >
> > I think that it is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
> > latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
> > ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
>
> You mean 99.99999%, don't you?
>
> --
> Orac
Actually, I think he means 100%.
Steve
Doc Tavish
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>In article <cobs7topt735isaq4...@4ax.com>,
>Brian Blank <Iamnot...@home.spamblocker.com> wrote:
>
>[in response to an utterly and hopelessly stupid twit]
>
>>And note that this is not http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken
>>Idiot. Are you unable to see that COM and NET are two separate and
>>distinct words? Are you so stupid that you are unable to see that
>>these are two different domains? Are you so cretinous that you are
>>unable to see that you keep posting the proof that you are indeed a
>>complete idiot?
>
>I think it is only fair to address these questions sequentially. (To
>the Twit: That means "one at a time")
>
>"Are you unable to see that COM and NET are two separate and
>distinct words?"
>
>Yes, he is.
>
>"Are you so stupid that you are unable to see that
>these are two different domains?"
>
>Yes, he is.
>
>"Are you so cretinous that you are
>unable to see that you keep posting the proof that you are indeed a
>complete idiot?"
>
>Yes, he is.
From: Doc Tavish <doc_tavi...@my-deja.com>
Susie
NAZIHUNTER wrote in message <95klae$2m7d$1...@news.tht.net>...
Yeah but come on, Nancy... are ya gonna wang it into the Bleachers, or is it
gonna be another softly tapped catch...?
--
Susie
Susie
Doc Tavish wrote in message ...
Uh oh...
Ding dong.
TILT.
--
Susie
Susie
Doc Tavish wrote in message ...
>FOLKS THE ABOVE QUESTIONS ARE HONEST AND THEY SHOULD BE ANSWERED. WOULD
>YOU MAKE CHARITABLE DONATIONS FOR AN ORGANIZATION WHICH IS DEPICTED ABOVE?
>Any evasion by McVay should warrant your suspicions.
And any similarity between your erratic caps and Nancy Hunter's are purely
coincidental, eh?
--
Susie
Susie
Brian Blank wrote in message ...
>The words "hoist" and "petard" come to mind.........
As do, "own", "arse" and "finger".
--
Susie
Susie
Doc Tavish wrote in message <8u9s7t06d4ev36d0v...@4ax.com>...
The ffuck if you don't come across as sad, Tav.
--
Susie
Susie
Doc Tavish wrote in message ...
>The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
>page?
Do we care? This is alt.revisionism not alt.ican.usetheweb.
--
Susie
Dobr...@webtv.net
HERE'S A THOUGHT: MEET SCOTTY ON FEB. 7
Group: alt.revisionism Date: Sun, Feb 4, 2001, 10:32pm (PST+8) From:
mar...@idirect.com (NAZIHUNTER)
NAVIGATE BEYOND THE 25 FT RANGE OF HIS MOTHER'S LEASH, ONE HOPES THAT HE
CAN ATTEND HIS DAMAGES HEARING ON FEB 7 IN ALLENTOWN. THATS THE DAY
SCOTTY LOSES HIS RENTED STY.
SO LETS ALL MEET HIM...WITH BASEBALL BATS...
I like baseball and would not dream of contaminating a bat by hitting
Scotty with it. After contact with his slimy body, the bat would
probably begin to rot.
Joe Bruno
Respect is a two- way street
http://www.trachtman.org/MIDI/Joplin/magnetic.mid
Susie
Dobr...@webtv.net wrote in message
<19224-3A...@storefull-173.iap.bryant.webtv.net>...
SO LETS ALL MEET HIM...WITH BASEBALL BATS...
I like baseball and would not dream of contaminating a bat by hitting
Scotty with it.
It must be me, but I keep missing the bit where Nancy Hunter tells folk to
hit Scotty with a baseball bat...
--
Susie
David Christian
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On 05 Feb 2001 02:01:28 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
>>seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
>>stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
>>have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
>
>The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
>page? I can't help it if it changed from COM to NET-
Yup, Scottikins, you've hit the nail on the head. The entire domain
changed its extension, just to make you look silly. Fiendish, huh?
Sara
dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
But the question is... is he still going to REPORT me for notifying him
that he is an idiot?
Sara
(Yosarian) wrote:
No, they don't "change" at will, they "change" JUST TO MAKE MR. BRADBURY
LOOK FOOLISH.
Shaklee told me so. They did it just to annoy Mr. Bradbury. Uh huh. Yep.
Sara
<su...@millersfield.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:
ROFLMAO!!!!! Just lovely.
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
[...]
>But the question is... is he still going to REPORT me for notifying him
>that he is an idiot?
I am announcing, in this very announcement, that there may be an
announcement about this in the very near future.
That was my announcement, which I have announced.
Derek Bell
Tavish has friends???????????????????????????????????
Derek
--
Derek Bell db...@maths.tcd.ie |"Usenet is a strange place."
WWW: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/index.html| - Dennis M Ritchie,
PGP: http://www.maths.tcd.ie/~dbell/key.asc | 29 July 1999.
|
Derek Bell
:> > latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
:> > ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
:> You mean 99.99999%, don't you?
In fact, studies have shown that Tavish has the potential to
achieve 1000%.
The soi-disant "NAZIHUNTER" has already scored 1000% on the
bozoidal scale.
Derek Bell
: No, they don't "change" at will, they "change" JUST TO MAKE MR. BRADBURY
: Shaklee told me so. They did it just to annoy Mr. Bradbury. Uh huh. Yep.
Sara, here's a secret - don't let Bradbury know - URLs change
all the time just to annoy him. He doesn't have the "seekrit dekoder"
in his browser that lets everyone else surf on without noticing it.
Derek Bell
: Doc Tavish wrote in message ...
:>The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
:>page?
: Do we care? This is alt.revisionism not alt.ican.usetheweb.
Though it's turning into alt.tavish.cant.surf
Kenneth McVay, OBC
Derek Bell <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>: No, they don't "change" at will, they "change" JUST TO MAKE MR. BRADBURY
>: LOOK FOOLISH.
>: Shaklee told me so. They did it just to annoy Mr. Bradbury. Uh huh. Yep.
>
> Sara, here's a secret - don't let Bradbury know - URLs change
>all the time just to annoy him. He doesn't have the "seekrit dekoder"
>in his browser that lets everyone else surf on without noticing it.
Methinks he has graduated to the Infamous Moron's Rigii!
joebru...@my-deja.com
Who is Nancy Hunter?
Joe Bruno
> --
> Susie
>
>
Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/
kcom
--
Steve
Doc Tavish
>In article <77dt7tk8lnrdtmo7d...@4ax.com>,
>dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 04:10:37 GMT, Doc Tavish
>> <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 05 Feb 2001 02:01:28 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >>Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
>> >>seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
>> >>stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
>> >>have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
>> >The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
>> >page? I can't help it if it changed from COM to NET-
>> Yup, Scottikins, you've hit the nail on the head. The entire domain
>> changed its extension, just to make you look silly. Fiendish, huh?
All I know is when I used the original link it worked because how would I
have seen the web page I described? Never mind the link I gave the FTC
along with a complaint of alleged false advertising
had the link: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme> submitted BTW if
that picture is not Wendy then that is false advertising. I doubt if that
picture is Wendy because the woman in the picture looks like she's wearing
a cross which I don't think a woman would be wearing in a Jewish
household!! Also MS is not reversible and the ad copy reads like a
"miracle cure." Like I said "alleged false advertising." I am waiting for
the FTC to answer now.
>But the question is... is he still going to REPORT me for notifying him
>that he is an idiot?
Sticks and stones may break my bones but the squealings of a pig will
never ever harm me. Squeal away to your heart's content.
Doc Tavish
BTW FTC's homepage is www.ftc.gov
Their file a complaint online link is:
https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
>Sara
---
>I ask-- why do we never see Jews criticize the communism
>which existed before Stalin took control?
"Because there was very little to criticize."
Susan Cohen - January 24, 2001
<http://x60.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=719797306&fmt=text>
Doc Tavish
>In article <77dt7tk8lnrdtmo7d...@4ax.com>,
>dckomat...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 05 Feb 2001 04:10:37 GMT, Doc Tavish
>> <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On 05 Feb 2001 02:01:28 GMT, Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >[...]
>> >
>> >>Has EVERYONE figured out Mr. Bradbury's "problem" with the URLs yet? It
>> >>seems almost impossible that a single person could be THAT incredilby
>> >>stupid, and CONTINUE to be so stupid even after at least three people
>> >>have pointed out to him what is WRONG with the URL he posted....
Personal attack is ALL you people have! Do you realize the ratio of posts
you make in which you make personal attack against me versus me
exclusively making personal attack against you all? Make all the personal
attacks you wish-- you only give me publicity with your squawking. Be sure
to keep your eyes open for some really knock out posts I've been working
up from new materials from Jewish web sites. BTW hecklers-- you have no
idea of how much your behavior reflects against you! Doesn't hurt me at
all. You should see my e-mail-- the silent majority bestows their
blessings upon me. You only win when your evil criminal behavior scares
others away BUT then again sooner or later it will turn about and devour
you all. I've been asked how I can keep going in spite of the heckling and
death threats and I always reply that if I don't post along with a few
other brave souls then how will the rest of humanity know how the serpents
operate today.
>> >The URL I originally posted worked! How do you think I viewed the web
>> >page? I can't help it if it changed from COM to NET-
>> Yup, Scottikins, you've hit the nail on the head.
I still could not have gotten to the inner links if my original link did
not work. A Fluke? Most likely but the fact is-- the link did give me
initial access! (I found out after I made the previous statements why my
original link worked. I attach my original post below with the Deja URL.)
>>The entire domain changed its extension, just to make you look silly.
>>Fiendish, huh?
All I know is when I used the original link it worked because how would I
have seen the web page I described? Never mind the link I gave the FTC
along with a complaint of alleged false advertising
had the link: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme> submitted BTW if
that picture is not Wendy then that is false advertising. I doubt if that
picture is Wendy because the woman in the picture looks like she's wearing
a cross which I don't think a woman would be wearing in a Jewish
household!! Also MS is not reversible and the ad copy reads like a
"miracle cure." Like I said "alleged false advertising." I am waiting for
the FTC to answer now.
>But the question is... is he still going to REPORT me for notifying him
>that he is an idiot?
Sticks and stones may break my bones but the squealings of a pig will
never ever harm me. Squeal away to your heart's content.
Doc Tavish
BTW FTC's homepage is www.ftc.gov
Their file a complaint online link is:
https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$.startup?Z_ORG_CODE=PU01
Here is what you will see as a response if you use the above
online complaint:
https://rn.ftc.gov/dod/wsolcq$solcq.actioninsert
Success!
Complaint Accepted. Thank you for your input.
First Name: Scott
Last Name: Bradbury
Year Of Birth: (YYYY)
E-Mail Address: xxx...@flash.net
Subject of Your Complaint: Health
Name of Company You Are Complaining About: Edeiken Associates
Street Address: xxxxxxx
City: xxxxxx
State or Canadian Province: Pennsylvania
Country: UNITED STATES
Zip Code or Postal Code: ?
Company Web Site: http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
Company E-Mail Address: ya...@enter.net
Phone Number: xxxxxxxxxxx Ext.
How Did the Company Initially Contact You?: Internet Web Site
Explain Your Problem: http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
The link above makes some pretty tall claims concerning the products
ability in dealing with MS and also I am certain the picture shown is NOT
the person who made the web page and claims to have MS. I have read what
MS has at their web site an alternative cures etc. and this appears to be
offering desperate people in dire straits a "miracle cure." Everything
I've read about MS shows it to be insidious and not reversible.
<Note I "X" out some of the info above to maintain privacy.>
Don't forget I posted how to find out more info on MS the other day:
Read this link straight from MS site <http://www.nmss.org/>:
http://www.nationalmssociety.org/Sourcebook-Alternative.asp
There is no way Edeiken's "miracle cure" would do as they claim.
Also see:
http://www.nationalmssociety.org/Brochures-Clear%20Thinking.asp
I wonder what the FDA and FTC will do? Hawking miracle cures to those in
dire straights certainly seems to be sleazy but then again-- this is Yale
Edeiken wanting to give people false hopes.
This link shows real treatments:
http://www.nationalmssociety.org/treatments.asp
Also: http://www.nationalmssociety.org/Therapies.asp
---------------------------------------------------
BTW what is funny about this whole link thing whether it is COM or NET
is how the thread went from my original NET to COM! Here is my original
post and it did specifically say NET!
http://x66.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=721815119
From: Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't Making it as an Attorney!
Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
Reply-To: NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com
Message-ID: <5kkc7tsrs1g5lpe9m...@4ax.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:44:23 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.174.7.66
X-Complaints-To: ab...@flash.net
X-Trace: news.flash.net 980833463 199.174.7.66 (Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:44:23
CST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:44:23 CST
Just in to Tavish Dispatch:
http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
Tubby, you gave out your phone number! Isn't this why you sued me because
I allegedly did so? My Tubby but you are a very FUNNY person!
Is that you wife in the picture Tubby?
Lurkers see: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme>
Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what you
Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then again
you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer Aryan
beauties over the pigs (like Sara).
Can't you make it as an attorney Tubby or are you limited to, as we have
seen posted before, suing other people because another person's dog shits
in their yard!?
BTW Tubby are you admitting that your wife has "debilitating multiple
sclerosis"? How would you like her to be poked fun of on account of a
disability like your pals have been reaming me about my narcolepsy and
vertigo? You're a bastard and you will fail too in this adventure!
Doc Tavish
~~End of EXACT Original Posting!!~~
The reason why the link I first posted worked was because it was the right
link! The above was my first announcement. I do not see how it went from
NET to COM but now that I looked back and pulled up the DejaCom archive I
was correct from day one! Care to explain this my serpentine enemies?
Here are two comments to my original and most correct post!
http://x66.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=722132862
Subject: Re: Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't Making it as an
Attorney!
Date: 01/30/2001
Author: joebruno9900 <joebru...@my-deja.com>
In article <5kkc7tsrs1g5lpe9m...@4ax.com>,
NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com wrote:
> Just in to Tavish Dispatch:
>
> http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
>
> Tubby, you gave out your phone number! Isn't this why you sued me
> because I allegedly did so? My Tubby but you are a very FUNNY person!
>
> Is that you wife in the picture Tubby?
> Lurkers see: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme>
> Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what
> you Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
> sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then
> again you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer
> Aryan beauties over the pigs (like Sara).
>
> Can't you make it as an attorney Tubby or are you limited to, as we
> have seen posted before, suing other people because another person's dog
> shits in their yard!?
>
> BTW Tubby are you admitting that your wife has "debilitating multiple
> sclerosis"? How would you like her to be poked fun of on account of a
> disability like your pals have been reaming me about my narcolepsy and
> vertigo? You're a bastard and you will fail too in this adventure!
>
> Doc Tavish
Narcolepsy, my foot! You're just a raving sick wacko. Get a job.
Joe Bruno
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
Notice that the link was still NET in Bruno's reply!
http://x66.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=722191894
Subject: Re: Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't Making it as an
Attorney!
Date: 01/31/2001
Author: Patrick L. Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> writes:
>Just in to Tavish Dispatch:
You mean one of your thug friends finally found it and came running to you
with it, Scottie.
>http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
>Tubby, you gave out your phone number! Isn't this why you sued me because
>I allegedly did so? My Tubby but you are a very FUNNY person!
Maybe if you'd bothered to read the mail the court sent you, you'd know
why Yale sued you -- but, you didn't, and that's why you lost the suit by
default.
>Is that you wife in the picture Tubby?
>Lurkers see: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme>
>Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what you
>Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
>sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then again
>you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer Aryan
>beauties over the pigs (like Sara).
Way to go, Scottie! Keep on ratcheting those damages up as the damage
award draws nigh! Remember those old pre-1980s gas pumps? You're
producing a whole chorus of bells.
>Can't you make it as an attorney Tubby or are you limited to, as we have
>seen posted before, suing other people because another person's dog shits
>in their yard!?
At least he's actually making money, Scottie...what are you doing, besides
living off other people's money?
>BTW Tubby are you admitting that your wife has "debilitating multiple
>sclerosis"? How would you like her to be poked fun of on account of a
>disability like your pals have been reaming me about my narcolepsy and
>vertigo? You're a bastard and you will fail too in this adventure!
Fail? He won a default judgement against you, Scottie, because you sent
all the mail back unopened. What's it like, being such a poor loser?
--PLH, I guess we'll find out pretty soon
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
Note my original and two replies prove beyond any doubt that I, in fact,
posted the correct link originally. How it got changed in the threads is a
mystery to me BUT based on my experience one of my enemies changed it to
create this diversion from the facts. Name call, personal attack, and
diversion is all you all have! Face it. I'm vindicated! You know I can't
fake those Deja URLs! Just makes me believe even more that you all are
trying to "hide" something. The more you all squawk generally sends a
signal that one of us is onto something!
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
BTW what is funny about this whole link thing whether it is COM or NET
Doc Tavish
BTW what is funny about this whole link thing whether it is COM or NET
Doc Tavish
(Kenneth McVay, OBC) wrote:
>In article <95mr2q$rtd$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>,
>Derek Bell <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>>Sara <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>: No, they don't "change" at will, they "change" JUST TO MAKE MR. BRADBURY
>>: LOOK FOOLISH.
>>: Shaklee told me so. They did it just to annoy Mr. Bradbury. Uh huh. Yep.
>> Sara, here's a secret - don't let Bradbury know - URLs change
>>all the time just to annoy him. He doesn't have the "seekrit dekoder"
>>in his browser that lets everyone else surf on without noticing it.
>Methinks he has graduated to the Infamous Moron's Rigii!
BTW what is funny about this whole link thing whether it is COM or NET
Charles Don Hall
@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>:
>Charles Don Hall <cdhall_remove_this@and_this_pobox.com> wrote:
>: Anyway, can one of his friends pass this on to him? Thanks!
>
> Tavish has friends???????????????????????????????????
Well, yes. Like Mr. Ellis.
That's how this whole thing got started. Mr. Ellis made up a story about
how that web page constituted false advertisement, and he encouraged Poor
Mr. Bradbury to take that story to the FTC as part of Poor Mr. Bradbury's
ongoing campaign of harassment that he's being sued over...
Actually, now that I think about it, "friends" was probably the wrong word
to use. I should have said "people that he listens to".
--
======================================
Charles Don Hall, Licensed Philosopher
======================================
David Christian
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
And, true to form, Scottikins shows us how truly dumb he is capable of
being.
Why, you silly man, did you start complaining about the site
vanishing, when, with the url correct, it is still online unchanged?
The real point of the thread, which I know bloody well you will not
want to discuss is different still. Why you and the Venomous Toad were
scouting out more personal information on Yale and his family. No
harassment intended, now was there, Scottikins?
Orac
<db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
>steve wolk <st...@home.com> wrote:
>: Orac wrote:
>:> In article <95kv5n$2nvm$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>:> ? is only fair to permit Mr. Bradbury sufficient
>:> > latitude to allow him to continue working towards making a complete
>:> > ass of himself, as opposed to his more usual 99%.
>:> You mean 99.99999%, don't you?
>: Actually, I think he means 100%.
>
> In fact, studies have shown that Tavish has the potential to
>achieve 1000%.
>
> The soi-disant "NAZIHUNTER" has already scored 1000% on the
>bozoidal scale.
Indeed. Such cowardly little twits are just as bad as the "Nazis" they
think they're tormenting.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Dobr...@webtv.net
air.
Buck Turgidson
Doc Tavish wrote:
But here's where you screwed up, Snottie:
<quote>
Path:
mindspring!news.mindspring.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!nntp.flash.net!news.flash.net!not-for-mail
From: Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Edeiken's consumer fraud site shut down.
Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
Reply-To: NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com
Message-ID: <j29m7toc2qbi5l0j8...@4ax.com>
References: <95el4p$3k3$1...@nnrp1.deja.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines:31
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 21:19:54 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.194.196.191
X-Complaints-To: ab...@flash.net
X-Trace: news.flash.net 981148794 208.194.196.191 (Fri, 02
Feb 2001 15:19:54 CST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:19:54 CST
Xref: mindspring alt.revisionism:935752
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:53:02 GMT, RevWhite <p...@imneverwrong.com> wrote:
>http://www.shaklee.com/edeiken - 404 error
>
>http://www.shaklee.com - still working.
>
>Looks like the folks at shaklee got a call from a consumer watchdog
>group in Pennsylvania when it was proven the picture used on the site
>was not that of Wendy Edeiken but stolen from a user on a geocities
>site.
>
>Another legal problem for Edeiken to worry about.
Poor Tubby! Couldn't have happened to a nicer bastard! hehehe
That's the price he has to pay for him continually being dishonest.
I'd bet he can't wait until the chickens come home to roost for all that
he has done to David and me. We won't be forgetting and we will be making
his life interesting in coming months-- all legal of course. It will be a
two prong assault so to speak. David will go after Tubby from his quadrant
and I will give Tubby another front.
Doc Tavish
</quote>
Only too happy to help, Bradshit. Hey, how are you going to post after they
seize your computer to help pay off the judgment?
-- Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
"It doesn't require much thought. One does not need 'facts' to interpret."
--The Liar David E. Michael
Kenneth McVay, OBC
ZOG1 RE TAVISH
MOST SECRET
Contingency plans to change SHAKLEE.COM to SHAKLEE.NET dependent upon
search engine access by Subject "TUBBY" entirely successful.
With the support of NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM, ZOGCANWEST successfully
changed SHAKLEE.COM to SHAKLEE.NET fourteen times in the past 9 days,
and changed SHAKLEE.NET to SHAKLEE.COM thirteen times during the same
period.
As predicted, The Moronic One was completely bamboozeled, and, as
predicted, made a complete ass of himself.
ZOGCANWEST wishes to thank ZOGCOLCENTRAL Salzman and
ZOGSOUTHAFRIKA for contributing to the successful humiliation of
someone almost too stupid to _be_ humiliated.
ZOG1 extends congratulations on behalf of the Learned Elders on the
successful completion of this specific Lard-Off, and invites ZOGNA
agents to attend the entertaining ZOGPA Anti-Tubby Meeting, to be held
in Pennsylvania on February Seventh in the appropriate Court.
ZOG Target "Tubby", as usual, will not appear. Street talk has it that
he has no gonads, but in the complete absence of female confirmation,
this cannot be confirmed. Subject's deranged, high, squeaky voice
should not be construed as evidence of the absence of presence.
Nonetheless, the Spielberg special, "ZOG vrs. Utter Stupidity" will
be aired as planned, narated by Desmond Morristein.
Our thanks to Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject
Tubbiness.
ZOGCANWEST
MOST SECRET
david_michael
oppressing it (but who then employs a campaign of smears and intimidation
against revisionists), has now killfiled pretty much all the revisionists in
alt.revisionism and has joined the campaign to wreck alt.revisionism by
posting large numbers of inane messages thereby drowning out those who wish
to discuss revisionism.
Such are the tactics of the anti-revisionists.
David
Kenneth McVay, OBC <kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org> wrote in message
news:95o746$cqj$1...@news.tht.net...
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
steve wolk
david_michael wrote:
>
> Mr McVay, he who advocates arguing against revisionism rather than
> oppressing it (but who then employs a campaign of smears and intimidation
> against revisionists), has now killfiled pretty much all the revisionists in
> alt.revisionism and has joined the campaign to wreck alt.revisionism by
> posting large numbers of inane messages thereby drowning out those who wish
> to discuss revisionism.
>
> Such are the tactics of the anti-revisionists.
>
> David
Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, etc. So it goes from the Nazi
sympathizer and apologist who is not in Lincolnshire.
Steve
Derek Bell
: Here is evidence my original CORRECT link was changed in the thread and
: making the appearance I posted the wrong link as witnessed: "Our thanks to
: Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject Tubbiness."
I thought they had sarcasm in Bellville? Oh well, you live and learn.
Derek Bell
: We are always happy to serve ZOG. Unfortunately, this assignment was so
: simple, any baboon with a keyboard could have made the target look silly.
Surely it's most unfair to baboons to compare them with Tavish?
Derek Bell
: In article <95otv6$1kvo$1...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>,
: Derek Bell <db...@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> wrote:
:> Unfortunately, I have an important meeting tomorrow, which precludes
:>me from visiting the court to see Bradburys' non-attendance.
: Perhaps it will be available in Real Video format on one of the comedy
: websites...
Hopefully accompanied by a Real Video of Bradbury in Bellville
not attending court in Pennsylvania.
Derek Bell
: Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what you
: Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
: sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then again
: you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer Aryan
: beauties over the pigs (like Sara).
Laugh while you can, Nazi boy!!
Derek - he'll be laughing on the other side of his face
heyf...@my-deja.com
Poor Ol' Gutless Scottie "BOOGERMAN" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net) wrote:
> The facts are:
> 1) I originally posted the correct link.
> 2) My report to the FTC had in it the correct link.
> 3) My report to the local BBB had the correct link.
> 4) My report to the local consumer action group had the correct link. I
> don't know why these clowns are behaving in the manner they do!
Because...
5) After the first mention of it, you posted the wrong link repeatedly and
started crowing about how the pages had been 'removed', fat boy. They were never
removed -- you were just too jaw-droppingly stoooooopid to find them a second
time.
You're an idiot, pure and simple, lardbutt. Shut up and stop making a fool of
yourself.
JGB
================================================================== =====
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@my-deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Gord McFee
Gord McFee
david_michael wrote:
>
> Mr McVay, he who advocates arguing against revisionism rather than
> oppressing it (but who then employs a campaign of smears and intimidation
> against revisionists), has now killfiled pretty much all the revisionists in
> alt.revisionism and has joined the campaign to wreck alt.revisionism by
> posting large numbers of inane messages thereby drowning out those who wish
> to discuss revisionism.
David, take a Valium - you are starting to mumble again.
--
Gord McFee
[gord....@sympatico.ca]
Gord McFee
Sara wrote:
>
> In article <Orac-336FCE.1...@spamkiller.sucknews.com>, Orac
> <Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <catamont-9B1F1B...@news.concentric.net>, Sara
> > <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
> > > simple, any baboon with a keyboard could have made the target look
> > > silly.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed. Such a task is unworthy of even one full ZOG agent. Mere ZOG
> > lackeys
> > could certainly have handled it quite easily, preventing the need for ZOG
> > agents
> > to dirty their hands with such lowly tasks.
>
> This one could even have been done by one of the ZOG boy-toys. :)
You called? Goy boy-toy Gord reporting for duty.
--
Gord McFee
[gord....@sympatico.ca]
Paul Kneisel
trial, listen to evidence and argument, and then return a verdict.
Michael's usual rant about things only he seems to see is rather business
as usual from the same crowd who stresses their desire for academic
discourse.
Sara
<gord....@sympatico.ca> wrote:
There you are!! :)
Sara
--
"It's always nice to see a prejudice overruled by a deeper prejudice."
John Sayles, _Lone Star_
Derek Bell
: Indeed. Such a task is unworthy of even one full ZOG agent. Mere ZOG lackeys
: agents to dirty their hands with such lowly tasks.
Did I ever tell you about the time the ZOG Orbital mind control
lasers were focused on Bradbury by mistake? The feedback was so terrible
that it took weeks to recalibrate them. That's why I wrote the upgraded
targetting system - to prevent them being used against lifeforms that
don't have minds.
Oh, as a side effect, Bradbury had a thought - mainly that he
was a goldfish, but it was a first!
Derek - ZOG Orbital Mind Control Director
Derek Bell
: BTW what is funny about this whole link thing whether it is COM or NET
: is how the thread went from my original NET to COM! Here is my original
: post and it did specifically say NET!
Sara really knows how to get your goat, doesn't she?
Derek
Doc Tavish
<NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 07:09:24 -0000, "david_michael"
><david_...@onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>
>>Mr McVay, he who advocates arguing against revisionism rather than
>>oppressing it (but who then employs a campaign of smears and intimidation
>>against revisionists), has now killfiled pretty much all the revisionists in
>>alt.revisionism and has joined the campaign to wreck alt.revisionism by
>>posting large numbers of inane messages thereby drowning out those who wish
>>to discuss revisionism.
>>
>>Such are the tactics of the anti-revisionists.
>>
>>David
>Even stranger I posted the correct link to begin with and I have proven it
>yet they continue the same campaign. Now that is pathetic. I think one of
>them changed my original link from my original, as documented at DejaCom,
>in the thread with the sole purpose of creating this current diversion.
>
>Here is evidence my original CORRECT link was changed in the thread and
>making the appearance I posted the wrong link as witnessed: "Our thanks to
>Agent Salzman for her brilliant manipulation of Subject Tubbiness." I left
>all of McVay's assinine attempts to belittle me intact below. Strange he
>used the term "manipulation" because that is exactly what happened to the
>link from my original post! Shows the depths these serpents will go to in
>order to discredit me! The DejaCom Archive and URL below prove beyond any
>doubt that I posted the correct link! No IFS, ANDS, or BUTS!
>
> The facts are:
>1) I originally posted the correct link.
>2) My report to the FTC had in it the correct link.
>3) My report to the local BBB had the correct link.
>4) My report to the local consumer action group had the correct link. I
>don't know why these clowns are behaving in the manner they do!
>
>Here are my undeniable proofs:
>
>http://x66.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=721815119
>From: Doc Tavish <NOSPAMdo...@my-deja.com>
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Subject: Looks Like Yale "Tubby" Edeiken Isn't Making it as an Attorney!
>Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:44:23 GMT
>NNTP-Posting-Host: 199.174.7.66
>
>Just in to Tavish Dispatch:
>
>http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken
>
>Tubby, you gave out your phone number! Isn't this why you sued me because
>I allegedly did so? My Tubby but you are a very FUNNY person!
>
>Is that you wife in the picture Tubby?
>Lurkers see: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme>
>Can't be because it looks like she's wearing a cross and we know what you
>Jews do when you see crosses. Just like Count Dracula (a fellow blood
>sucker your kind is likened to) you should recoil in horror BUT then again
>you probably love those blond haired shiksas! Most Jews do prefer Aryan
>beauties over the pigs (like Sara)....
>
><END>
>
>My report to FTC:
>MS has at their web site on alternative cures etc. and this appears to be
>offering desperate people in dire straits a "miracle cure." Everything
>I've read about MS shows it to be insidious and not reversible.
>
><Note I "X" out some of the info above to maintain privacy.>
>
>My report to an Allentown consumer watchdog group:
>
>X-Sender: xx...@pop.flash.net
>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:12:52 -0600
>To: sbi...@quackwatch.com
>From: Scott Bradbury <xxx...@flash.net>
>Subject: Apparent Consumer Fraud in Allentown, Pennsylvania
>
>To whom it may concern,
> The following is a web page advertised a "miracle cure" as I will
>call it. I have strong suspicions Wendy Edeiken is not who she claims to
>be. This "company" is in Allentown, Pennsylvania and the address is:
>
>Yale F. Edeiken
><Address deleted for this post>
>
>If Wendy Edeiken is not afflicted with MS would not the following be
>definite consumer fraud and this is a web based business too!
>
>http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutme
>Edeiken Associates
>Wendy & Yale Edeiken
>
>You can change your life because I did!
>
>Let me tell you how I got involved with Shaklee.
>
>In 1984 I was debilitated with multiple sclerosis. I had little hope for
>the future and when friends from college told me about Shaklee, I was
>desperate enough to listen even though my doctor said that it would be a
>waste of money.
>
>With the help of a pharmacist in Shaklee, I began a well-balanced program
>of Shaklee supplements, exercise, positive visualization and healthy
>eating.
>
>I was amazed at the change! I had energy and the desire to take control of
>my prognosis. Now, sixteen years later, I have a thriving Shaklee
>business, I am teaching four days a week, and I look forward to every new
>day! <BLAH BLAH -- Rest deleted for this post>
Notice the claim above and see what Shaklee says at the web page linked by
Edeiken: <http://www.shaklee.net/edeiken/aboutshaklee>
Click the link and scroll down and see at the bottom: "These statements
have not been evaluated by the Food & Drug Administration. This product is
not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease." Note: The
aforementioned statement is not made in reference to Edeiken's spectacular
claims. (Read the link and you all will see!)
Read what Shaklee says at their web site and you all will see they do not
come even close to making such claims!
http://www.shaklee.com/shakleebasics/
They even have a PDF file for download:
http://www.shaklee.com/pdfs/basics_brief.pdf
No where at their site have I found any claims made for easing MS
symptoms! See <http://www.shaklee.com/products/briefs/basics/studies.html>
I even looked at other member pages and not one I looked at made the same
bold claims. Mainly all is mentioned is how great of a vitamin supplement
it is! Here is how to find memebers in your area:
http://www.shaklee.net/public/advSearch
I even found a distributor in Bellville!
><END>
>
>The point being-- I had the correct link from day one and what the clowns
>are trying to pull off below looks like another diversion. Also regardless
>of how my ignoramus adversaries act the reports were filed with the
>correct information and are in hands of people who investigate FRAUD!
>
>Also BTW I've talked to numerous arm chair lawyers and in their humble
>opinion (100% agreement) if that picture on Tubby's web page is NOT Wendy
>then that alone is consumer fraud because the text reads as a first person
>account and the picture is presented without identifying who she is SO
>most people would assume that is Wendy Edeiken. The Edeiken family is
>allegedly Observant Jews so why would Wendy be wearing a CROSS necklace?
>Here is the link to the purported picture of Wendy Edeiken:
>http://www.shaklee.net/pws/pictures/SA24013.jpg
>
>Somehow that link tells me that is just a public domain image!
><END>
>For the archives here is Sara "Sow" Salzman responding to McVay's childish
>antics. Don't these people realize they only bring dishonor to themselves?
><START>
>
>In article <95o746$cqj$1...@news.tht.net>, kmc...@nizkor.org wrote:
>
>We are always happy to serve ZOG. Unfortunately, this assignment was so
>simple, any baboon with a keyboard could have made the target look silly.
>
>ZOG Agent Sara
>
><END>
>So is Sara admitting that she deliberately "manipulated" my original
>CORRECT URL all in order to have made me; "the target look silly."? How is
>falsifying what I originally posted making me look silly Sara? And to
>think you still are clueless as to why I call you a lying filthy pig whore
>bitch. Remember I can call you worse and that I have exercised much
>restraint! More evidence that you lie, bear false witness, and are
>perjurious!
>
>Look! Here is more dishonesty by my adversaries:
><START>
>
>In article <Orac-336FCE.1...@spamkiller.sucknews.com>, Orac
><Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <catamont-9B1F1B...@news.concentric.net>, Sara
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> > We are always happy to serve ZOG. Unfortunately, this assignment was so
>> > simple, any baboon with a keyboard could have made the target look
>> > silly.
>> >
>> > ZOG Agent Sara
>> Indeed. Such a task is unworthy of even one full ZOG agent. Mere ZOG
>> lackeys could certainly have handled it quite easily, preventing the need for ZOG
>> agents to dirty their hands with such lowly tasks.
>This one could even have been done by one of the ZOG boy-toys. :)
>
>Sara
>
><END>
>Whose boy-toy Sow Salzman? Ken's or Orac's?
>
>Can you all believe the documented dishonesty by these swine? They are
>really getting brazen too!
>
> Doc Tavish