Donating to hatewatch.org = donating to Don Ellis
Mike Kalvatis
of money to acquire the domain of hatewatch.com.... However, it
appears that Goldman is now in financial trouble so please donate to
Hatewatch so that Don can recieve the rest of his money from Goldman.
The more you donate to hatewatch.org, the more you donate to Don
Ellis. Please help support hatewatch.org. Don needs the money
Mike
ex-Jew
Jeffrey G. Brown
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>As you all know, hatewatch.org paid Don Ellis a huge undisclosed sum
>of money to acquire the domain of hatewatch.com...
No, we don't all know that, Mikey. We see you saying so, but then we've
seen you say a lot of things that turned out to be a load of peanut
butter.
>However, it appears that Goldman is now in financial trouble...
_Why_ does it appear that way, Mikey?
>...so please donate to
>Hatewatch so that Don can recieve the rest of his money from Goldman.
Was Gutless Donnie really stupid enough to relinquish control of the
domain before he was paid in full? Doh!
>The more you donate to hatewatch.org, the more you donate to Don
>Ellis. Please help support hatewatch.org. Don needs the money
Well, on the basis that (a) you're a proven liar, (b) as a bigot, you're
highly motivated to keep money out of the hands of Hatewatch.org, and (c)
you're a miserable failure when it comes to reverse psychology, I think
I'll mail a donation to Hatewatch.org pronto dente.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Joel Rosenberg
"Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
news:flncdsgfdovk41mgf...@4ax.com...
> As you all know,
Trans.: "I, Don Ellis, am bluffing again..."
Sara Salzman
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>As you all know, hatewatch.org paid Don Ellis a huge undisclosed sum
>of money to acquire the domain of hatewatch.com....
We don't know any such thing. Please provide proof of this "huge" sum of money.
> However, it
>appears that Goldman is now in financial trouble so please donate to
>Hatewatch so that Don can recieve the rest of his money from Goldman.
>
>The more you donate to hatewatch.org, the more you donate to Don
>Ellis. Please help support hatewatch.org. Don needs the money
>
>Mike
>ex-Jew
--
In article <85ir3...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
Calling me a "nazi-boy" is as much of defamation as you can make.
As for FACTS- I have what I need. You can count on it "Fatbroad".
sjw
> appears that Goldman is now in financial trouble so please donate to
> Hatewatch so that Don can recieve the rest of his money from Goldman.
>
> The more you donate to hatewatch.org, the more you donate to Don
> Ellis. Please help support hatewatch.org. Don needs the money
>
> Mike
> ex-Jew
Donnie poop-eater needs money? Does he have to buy more shit? Post his
address, I'll send him some.
Steve
Doc Tavish
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.activism,
alt.politics.white-power
Subject: Re: Donating to hatewatch.org = donating to Don Ellis
Date: 20 Mar 2000 21:10:09 EST
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-200...@ts014d10.den-co.concentric.net>
On 20-Mar-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> In article <flncdsgfdovk41mgf...@4ax.com>, Mike Kalvatis
> <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>
> >As you all know, hatewatch.org paid Don Ellis a huge undisclosed sum
> >of money to acquire the domain of hatewatch.com....
> We don't know any such thing. Please provide proof of this "huge" sum of money.
> > However, it appears that Goldman is now in financial trouble so please donate
> > to Hatewatch so that Don can recieve the rest of his money from Goldman.
> >
> >The more you donate to hatewatch.org, the more you donate to Don
> >Ellis. Please help support hatewatch.org. Don needs the money
> >
> >Mike
> >ex-Jew
> In article <85ir3...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
>wrote:
>
> Calling me a "nazi-boy" is as much of defamation as you can make.
> As for FACTS- I have what I need. You can count on it "Fatbroad".
Just for the record now. I thought you said that you were going to stop using the
above as a sig line. I know I said you could BUT you said you wouldn't! Not good
at keeping your word are you? Is this a classic example of how Jews keep their
word or vows? Remember the Kol Nidre Didi?
Compare your sig line above to the exact words you said just some three or so
weeks ago!
http://x39.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=592704993&fmt=text
Subject: Re: Public Apology In Order to Sara Salzman and Concentric Net
aka Re: Sara Once Again Falsely Attributes Words to Me. Please Stop this
Abuse and Her Stalking
Date: 03/03/2000
Author: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
[...]
You did say concerning the above sig line did you not?:
>> Based on this apology from Scott Bradbury, I have removed the .sig line
>> that offends him.
I also said:
>You won fair and square and you answered my challenge. If you wish to
>keep using it then go ahead I will say nothing. I did afterall, as you proved, say
>the words you quoted me on. I never want anyone to think that I am so
>bullheaded that I won't admit that I was wrong. I did send the apology and retraction
>of complaint to your ISP. If you have any doubts that I did then feel free to FWD this
>message to them. I say again- you won fair and square.
>
> Scott Bradbury aka Doc Tavish
>
>> Sara
Abd you behaved, in this instance, appropriately. Therefore, I have absolutely
no problem in removing the offending .sig.
More flies with honey than vinegar, Mr. Bradbury. It always works.
Sara
~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
Folks just a classic living example of the Kol Nidre in practice.
This is the same attitude which contributes to Palestinian
distrust of Jews-- they say one thing and then do another!
I'll never ever trust Jews and their word means not one thing to me.
To see Sara's previous struggles with the Kol Nidre issues just visit these links:
http://x34.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=526920220&fmt=text
Subject: --Kol Nidre - Not Keeping Your Word--
http://x23.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=527293117&fmt=text
Prologue of the post:
"Many of you reading the following should make a copy of this post and show
it to all your neighbors, friends, and relatives. The following gives exact qualified
proof that Jews do in fact have teachings that non-Jews do not have a soul.
Sara Salzman completely deleted the material on non-Jews not having souls
from her reply but I restored it fully just below her feeble attempt to insult me. I
still maintain if Jews are taught they can break their word with their own God then
what worth is their word to mere man- especially those they view as not having
souls? You all should very carefully weigh the full import of this post."
Doc Tavish
sjw
>
> In article <flncdsgfdovk41mgf...@4ax.com>, Mike Kalvatis
> <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>
> >As you all know, hatewatch.org paid Don Ellis a huge undisclosed sum
> >of money to acquire the domain of hatewatch.com....
>
> We don't know any such thing. Please provide proof of this "huge" sum of money.
To titans of finance like Don 'Turd-sucker' Ellis, a twenty dollar bill
is a 'huge' sum of money.
Steve
Jeffrey G. Brown
you to a bloody pulp" Bradbury (sonn...@flash.net,
doc_t...@my-deja.com) wrote:
>Remember the Kol Nidre Didi?
Yup -- and we also remember that it doesn't mean what you've claimed it
means, Cockroach Boy.
That makes _you_ the liar.
David Gehrig
Even though he has to cross out the part that says "Play Money -- Not Negotiable."
@%<
Sara Salzman
When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back in. I
apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
Thank you for pointing this out, although your tone and manner leave
something to be desired.
I have deleted the sig again, and I hope it won't re-appear. As you
probably know, with Newswatcher you don't see the sig appear on a post, so
I didn't realise it had returned.
Sara
In article <8b6t7...@news1.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,alt.activism,
>alt.politics.white-power
>Subject: Re: Donating to hatewatch.org = donating to Don Ellis
>Date: 20 Mar 2000 21:10:09 EST
>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>Message-ID: <catamont-200...@ts014d10.den-co.concentric.net>
>
>On 20-Mar-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>> In article <flncdsgfdovk41mgf...@4ax.com>, Mike Kalvatis
>> <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>>
>> >As you all know, hatewatch.org paid Don Ellis a huge undisclosed sum
>> >of money to acquire the domain of hatewatch.com....
>
>> We don't know any such thing. Please provide proof of this "huge" sum
of money.
>
Doc Tavish
On 21-Mar-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> Mr. Bradbury:
>
> When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back in. I
> apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
>
> Thank you for pointing this out, although your tone and manner leave
> something to be desired.
I am sorry for acting like a sphincter and seeing how my arm was painfully twisted-
I accept your explanation and bear no malice. You wouldn't believe who came to
your defense and said "Tav I don't think that little Jewess meant you no harm. Cut
her some slack on this one." I couldn't turn him down. If you are wondering who
took up for you just scroll down.
> I have deleted the sig again, and I hope it won't re-appear. As you
> probably know, with Newswatcher you don't see the sig appear on a post, so
> I didn't realise it had returned.
>
> Sara
Bruno (The Beast of Bavaria) defended you!
Doc Tavish
Anti-Nazi
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-210...@ts011d05.den-co.concentric.net...
> Mr. Bradbury:
>
> When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back in. I
> apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
"apoligise"? It also fucked up your spell checker...or is that one of your
idiot's new words?
> Thank you for pointing this out, although your tone and manner leave
> something to be desired.
>
> I have deleted the sig again, and I hope it won't re-appear. As you
> probably know, with Newswatcher you don't see the sig appear on a post, so
> I didn't realise it had returned.
>
> Sara
>
sjw
>
> "Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> news:catamont-210...@ts011d05.den-co.concentric.net...
> > Mr. Bradbury:
> >
> > When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back in. I
> > apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
>
> "apoligise"? It also fucked up your spell checker...or is that one of your
> idiot's new words?
Donnie Turd-sucker is wrong again. No surprise there. Webster's 3rd
New International gives 'apologise' as an alternate spelling for
'apologize'. Is that egg on your face, Donnie? No, it's not egg. Eggs
aren't brown.
Steve
>
David E Michael
sjw wrote:
Ahem. Mr Wolk, the word you used was not 'apologise'. It was 'apoligise'. Mr
Ellis was correct. You were incorrect. As always.
David
On 5 February 2000 William Daffer wrote: 'total honesty isn't required'.
On 21 November 1998 Scot Murphy wrote: 'Yes, these are newsgroups I lurked
through--though never contributed to'.
On 30 January 2000 Michael Ragland wrote: 'I must admit I have at times done
revisionist postings to confuse others and help the anti-revisionist side. How
so, well I've stated the Nazis killed millions of Jews but Hitler didn't know
about it! I
realize that by acknowledging the Nazis killed millions of Jew, even if I have
demonstrated there is no proof Hitler knew about the extermination, I have
caused some damage to revisionists.'
On 8 February 2000 Michael Ragland wrote: 'Sometimes telling half-truths, white
lies, etc. is important for self-preservation and to achieve certain ends.'
Jeffrey G. Brown
>I am sorry for acting like a sphincter...
Well, Scottie, we really can't blame you for being true to your nature...
Anti-Nazi
"David E Michael" <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:38D8885A...@btinternet.com...
>
>
> sjw wrote:
>
> > Anti-Nazi wrote:
> > >
> > > "Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> > > news:catamont-210...@ts011d05.den-co.concentric.net...
> > > > Mr. Bradbury:
> > > >
> > > > When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back
in. I
> > > > apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
> > >
> > > "apoligise"? It also fucked up your spell checker...or is that one of
your
> > > idiot's new words?
> >
> > Donnie Turd-sucker is wrong again. No surprise there. Webster's 3rd
> > New International gives 'apologise' as an alternate spelling for
> > 'apologize'. Is that egg on your face, Donnie? No, it's not egg. Eggs
> > aren't brown.
> >
> > Steve
> > >
>
> Ahem. Mr Wolk, the word you used was not 'apologise'. It was 'apoligise'.
Mr
> Ellis was correct. You were incorrect. As always.
>
> David
>
Store bought eggs (commerical) are white with a yellow yoke, but fresh eggs
are several shades of brown with a orange yoke. This is because the
commerical hens are feed a liquid diet to promote egg laying. Farm hens are
feed corn (chops) plus they are allowed to feed on insects and worms. The
brown egg has a stronger flavor compared to the commerical egg. Steve is
incorrect again. As always.
Don
Fledgist
>Store bought eggs (commerical) are white with a yellow yoke, but fresh eggs
>are several shades of brown with a orange yoke. This is because the
>commerical hens are feed a liquid diet to promote egg laying. Farm hens are
>feed corn (chops) plus they are allowed to feed on insects and worms. The
>brown egg has a stronger flavor compared to the commerical egg. Steve is
>incorrect again. As always.
>
>Don
>
>
It is clear that Mr Ellis is from another planet.
Fragano Ledgister
(Fled...@aol.com)
Dawn over the dark sea brings on the sun;
She leans across the hilltop: see, the light!
Sara Salzman
>On 21-Mar-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>> Mr. Bradbury:
>>
>> When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back in. I
>> apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
>>
>> Thank you for pointing this out, although your tone and manner leave
>> something to be desired.
>
>I am sorry for acting like a sphincter and seeing how my arm was
painfully twisted-
>I accept your explanation and bear no malice. You wouldn't believe who came to
>your defense and said "Tav I don't think that little Jewess meant you no
harm. Cut
>her some slack on this one." I couldn't turn him down. If you are wondering who
>took up for you just scroll down.
>
>> I have deleted the sig again, and I hope it won't re-appear. As you
>> probably know, with Newswatcher you don't see the sig appear on a post, so
>> I didn't realise it had returned.
>>
>> Sara
>
>
>Bruno (The Beast of Bavaria) defended you!
>
> Doc Tavish
Interesting. Is that the same Bruno who was going to make a new holster
cover out of my skin? As in:
">Briuno eagerly awaits the day when he is able to peel your
>kind like onions with his lash. I could just see the sweat
>and blood spray when Bruno lays on the flay.
>
>In your case I wouldn't want him to damage your hide. I want a
>new shade for my floor lamp and a new holster for my Desert Eagle
>pistol.
>
>Bruno would, in your case, use electricity and the various
>exploitations of body cavities with large blunt objects. :-)
>
>Mazel Tob you witch."
What has caused this chage of heart?
Sara
--
-Sig currently on vacation
Sara Salzman
anonymously. Now show the parts you cut out.
Sara
In article <8bbno...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
>From: cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,
>alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
>Subject: Re: Sara Didi Salzman Illustrates the Kol Nidre
>aka Re: Donating to hatewatch.org = donating to Don Ellis
>Date: 22 Mar 2000 12:24:50 EST
>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>Message-ID: <catamont-220...@ts004d29.den-co.concentric.net>
>Sara, Sara, Sara-- you just informed on yourself when you said Bruno said
>all of the above toward YOU when you said (above): " Is that the same Bruno
>who was going to make a new holster cover out of my skin? As in..."
>
>Those words were in a reply to an anonymous post! So I guess YOU were
>the one that posted what Bruno responded to!!!
>
>Here is the original post and notice the words you quoted above above
>compared to what is below!
>
>http://x44.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=558390093&fmt=text
>Subject: Will Bruno Ever Have His Way and Day? Let Us All Hope So!
>aka Re: Tavish: Queen of Cut & Paste and Paranoid Moron?
>Date: 12/09/1999
>Author: Tavish <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com>
>
><anon...@cotse.com> wrote:
>
>> Anonymous post.
>>
>> Tavish: Queen of Cut & Paste and Paranoid Moron?
>>
>> It's quite humorous to see "Tavish" getting so worked up
>> about alleged forgery in his own name. After all Tavish
>> invented cut and paste forgery-all of these "Tavish"
>> forgeries could all be coming from him anyway. It's
>> especially hilarious to see Tavish's quick responses to any
>> of these alleged incidents of forgery. Kind of paranoid
>> Tav? By the way, none of your forgers are Jewish.
>
>That is a real big lie. In all my experiences with Jews I have found that
mainly
>it's Jews who behave in your lunatic manner.
>
>> Also, Tav's comment of "reporting this to the authorities"
>> is quite humorous.
>
>What would really be humorous is for American people to
>apply severe pressure to get foreign policy changed. It
>would only be the right thing to do for America to stop
>being Israel's bully-boy. America needs to stop defending
>Israel. If this were so then the Palestinians and others in
>the Mid East would be able to "settle their accounts" with you
>Zhids and America would no longer be known as the
>Great Satan in the world.
>
>I just wonder how long it would take for the Palestinians
>to crack the skulls of their former captors and tormentors.
>
>I would relish the thought of justice being exacted against
>the evil horde that G-d has even abandoned. The temple
>being in ruins for nearly two millenia is truthful fact that
>Zhids are no longer G-d's chosen but they are as scripture
>foretold "become the laughing stock of all nations.."
>
>> After all, don't the Jews control everything in the US, Tav?
>> Most TRUE patriots "know" that the Jews, when they're
>> not working on communist plots, are
>> even in on law enforcement. So just who are you turning to?
>>
>> At least he has Bruno, his "Beast of Munich"!
>
>Briuno eagerly awaits the day when he is able to peel your
>kind like onions with his lash. I could just see the sweat
>and blood spray when Bruno lays on the flay.
>
>In your case I wouldn't want him to damage your hide. I want a
>new shade for my floor lamp and a new holster for my Desert Eagle pistol.
>
>Bruno would, in your case, use electricity and the various
>exploitations of body cavities with large blunt objects. :-)
>
>Mazel Tob you witch.
>
> Doc Tavish
>
>> Posted Anonymously.
>
> ~~~End of DejaCom Archive~~~
>
>You have been very naughty Miss Sara. You have condemned others for
posting anonymously in the past and here you have "told on yourself" for
doing so.
>
>My Tavish cat is grinning, Bruno is laughing, I am rolling all over the
floor laughing
>and I just peed in my BVDs for laughing so hard! No hard feelings now! :-)
>
> Your pal forever,
> Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
Anti-Nazi
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-220...@ts012d01.den-co.concentric.net...
Doc Tavish
On 22-Mar-2000, David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> sjw wrote:
>
> > Anti-Nazi wrote:
> > > "Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> > > news:catamont-210...@ts011d05.den-co.concentric.net...
> > > > Mr. Bradbury:
> > > >
> > > > When my computer crashed, it seemed to have put the sig line back in. I
> > > > apoligise, I said I would delete it, and I thought I had.
> > > "apoligise"? It also fucked up your spell checker...or is that one of your
> > > idiot's new words?
> > Donnie Turd-sucker is wrong again. No surprise there. Webster's 3rd
> > New International gives 'apologise' as an alternate spelling for
> > 'apologize'. Is that egg on your face, Donnie? No, it's not egg. Eggs
> > aren't brown.
> >
> > Steve
> Ahem. Mr Wolk, the word you used was not 'apologise'. It was 'apoligise'. Mr
> Ellis was correct. You were incorrect. As always.
>
> David
Steve Wolk is a chronic troll without one single thing to contribute
to this newsgroup. That is why I have killfiled the little turd months
ago along with his homosexual pal Buck Turgidson.
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Date: 22 Mar 2000 21:02:53 EST
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-220...@ts012d01.den-co.concentric.net>
On 22-Mar-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> Nice trimming, Mr. Bradbury, but you know damned well I have never posted
> anonymously.
Why did you say what Bruno was going to do to YOU when I was responding to
anonymous post? Looks to me like you are confessing you DID make said
anonymous post!
> Now show the parts you cut out.
Parts I cut out? The link is there for you to verify! You even quoted the spelling
of Bruno as "Bruino"!
Your pal forever and three days,
Doc Tavish
Sara Salzman
<postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
>
That's what the Prosecutor said, right?
Sara Salzman
<postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
>news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
>> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
>> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>>
>> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
>> >
>>
>> That's what the Prosecutor said, right?
>>
>> Sara
>>
>What prosecutor?
Oh, come now, Mr. Ellis. The Prosecutor who sent you the "cease and
desist" order.
Joel Rosenberg
didn't work for his latest speeding ticket, either.
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-230...@ts007d27.den-co.concentric.net...
> In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>
> >"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
> >> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
> >> >
> >>
> >> That's what the Prosecutor said, right?
> >>
> >> Sara
> >>
> >What prosecutor?
>
> Oh, come now, Mr. Ellis. The Prosecutor who sent you the "cease and
> desist" order.
>
Anti-Nazi
> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
Brimstone
again she is not a nice person.
Brimstone
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Dave Michael
> In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>
> >> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Sara
> >>
> >What prosecutor?
>
> desist" order.
>
> Sara
>
I have no idea what you're talking about. Stop stalking me Sara.
Confused
Mike Kalvatis
him and confirm your statement.
Mike
On 23 Mar 2000 23:16:42 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
wrote:
>In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
><postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>
>>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
>>news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
>>> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
>>> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
>>> >
>>>
Joel Rosenberg
"Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
news:qp5nds8iaor4td7ud...@4ax.com...
> Name the prosector Sara and give his phone number so that I can call
> him and confirm your statement.
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 23 Mar 2000 23:16:42 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
> wrote:
>
> >In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> ><postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >
> >>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >>news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
> >>> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >>> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
> >>> >
> >>>
Sara Salzman
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>Name the prosector Sara and give his phone number so that I can call
>him and confirm your statement.
Why?
>
>Mike
>
Philip Green, Prosecuting Attorney, Lincoln County, Arkansas.
Call information yourself and get the phone number.
I don't advise you to harass him, though. On the other hand, please do.
I'm sure he'd be delighted to hear from an Ellis sock-puppet, especially
since he has all the e-mails in which you and Ellis discuss reporting me
to Child Welfare services.
Sara Salzman
<jo...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>Read the letter he sent you, Donnie.
>
Or just try and remember back a day or two to when you met with him.
Sara
>
>"Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
>news:qp5nds8iaor4td7ud...@4ax.com...
>> Name the prosector Sara and give his phone number so that I can call
>> him and confirm your statement.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>> On 23 Mar 2000 23:16:42 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
>> ><postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
>> >>news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
>> >>> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
>> >>> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>> >>> That's what the Prosecutor said, right?
>> >>>
>> >>> Sara
>> >>>
>> >>What prosecutor?
>> >
>> >Oh, come now, Mr. Ellis. The Prosecutor who sent you the "cease and
>> >desist" order.
>> >
Joel Rosenberg
Waldheimer's Disease: it's when you forget you're a nazi.
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-240...@ts003d10.den-co.concentric.net...
> In article <UOMC4.185$YJ1....@news.uswest.net>, "Joel Rosenberg"
> <jo...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >Read the letter he sent you, Donnie.
> >
>
> Or just try and remember back a day or two to when you met with him.
>
> Sara
>
> >
> >"Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> >news:qp5nds8iaor4td7ud...@4ax.com...
> >> Name the prosector Sara and give his phone number so that I can call
> >> him and confirm your statement.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23 Mar 2000 23:16:42 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >> ><postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >> >>news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
> >> >>> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >> >>> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That's what the Prosecutor said, right?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sara
> >> >>>
> >> >>What prosecutor?
> >> >
> >> >Oh, come now, Mr. Ellis. The Prosecutor who sent you the "cease and
> >> >desist" order.
> >> >
Sara Salzman
<jo...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>Vaguely related definition:
>
>Waldheimer's Disease: it's when you forget you're a nazi.
>
Nicely done!
Sara
trimmed to a.r
sjw
>
> In article <UOMC4.185$YJ1....@news.uswest.net>, "Joel Rosenberg"
> <jo...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
>
> >Read the letter he sent you, Donnie.
> >
>
> Or just try and remember back a day or two to when you met with him.
>
> Sara
Wasn't that just before he stopped harrassing Sara here? What a
coincidence!
Steve
>
> >
> >"Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> >news:qp5nds8iaor4td7ud...@4ax.com...
> >> Name the prosector Sara and give his phone number so that I can call
> >> him and confirm your statement.
> >>
> >> Mike
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23 Mar 2000 23:16:42 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <JyAC4.7198$6S3.1...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >> ><postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >> >>news:catamont-230...@ts013d32.den-co.concentric.net...
> >> >>> In article <fGgC4.4375$6S3.8...@tw11.nn.bcandid.com>, "Anti-Nazi"
> >> >>> <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >Hey Doc, Ignore the welfare hog.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That's what the Prosecutor said, right?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sara
> >> >>>
> >> >>What prosecutor?
> >> >
> >> >Oh, come now, Mr. Ellis. The Prosecutor who sent you the "cease and
> >> >desist" order.
> >> >
Mike Kalvatis
harassment at all, just fact finding.
Hey, why are you so silent about Michael Ragland and his conviction on
internet forgery, and his admission to downloading kiddie porn because
he thought it was legal at the time?
And yes, I do think you are a sub-mother still. Anyone who would leave
a child's father to run off with another man is a sub-mother.
Mike
Jeffrey G. Brown
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>Anyone who would leave a child's father to run off with another man
>is a sub-mother.
There are, of course, no facts to back up that claim -- but Mikey isn't
one to let an opportunity to commit libel slip past him.
Sara Salzman
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>oh, I might call just to find out some details. Nothing about
>harassment at all, just fact finding.
>
>Hey, why are you so silent about Michael Ragland and his conviction on
>internet forgery, and his admission to downloading kiddie porn because
>he thought it was legal at the time?
I haven't been silent at all. Mr. Ragland was soing exactly what Mr. Ellis
is still currently doing. If there's any justice in the world, Mr. Ellis
will suffer exactly the same fate.
Porn? You mean like the vile stuff Mr. Ellis' website is so full of?
>
>And yes, I do think you are a sub-mother still. Anyone who would leave
>a child's father to run off with another man is a sub-mother.
>
>Mike
It's amazing that not everyone else has your clear sense of right and
wrong, Mr. Kalvatis.
So, in other words, no matter WHAT happened, I should have stayed in my
first marriage.
How about if my husband was a drug addict? Or a child abuser? Or a
wife-beater? Or a lay-about who refused to work to support the family? Or
a cheater? Or a criminal? Or any one of a million other dysfucntional
things?
Since you know nothing about my personal life, and even less about my
ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
information.
sjw
>
> oh, I might call just to find out some details. Nothing about
> harassment at all, just fact finding.
>
> Hey, why are you so silent about Michael Ragland and his conviction on
> internet forgery, and his admission to downloading kiddie porn because
> he thought it was legal at the time?
>
> a child's father to run off with another man is a sub-mother.
>
> Mike
So says Mike Kalvatis, the sub-human.
Steve
Dave McVay
had any meetings. I have a deadline on this new web site and I'm very busy
building it. In fact, at this time I'm working on her Bio. She likes
stalking me.
eleven
"Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
news:2fundscfililqq8ub...@4ax.com...
Kenneth McVay OBC
Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>Since you know nothing about my personal life, and even less about my
>ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
>information.
The amazing part, my friend, is that Mr. Ellis can draw a conclusion
of any sort with virtually no brain.
--
The Nizkor Project | Remember: http://www.nizkor.org
-----------------------|
Kenneth McVay, OBC |--------------------------------------------
Director | Home: http://www.nizkor.org/~kmcvay
Dave McVay
> >harassment at all, just fact finding.
> >
> >Hey, why are you so silent about Michael Ragland and his conviction on
> >internet forgery, and his admission to downloading kiddie porn because
> >he thought it was legal at the time?
>
> is still currently doing. If there's any justice in the world, Mr. Ellis
> will suffer exactly the same fate.
>
Why don't you prove it? All talk and no action?
Mike Kalvatis
wrote:
>
>How about if my husband was a drug addict? Or a child abuser? Or a
>wife-beater? Or a lay-about who refused to work to support the family? Or
>a cheater? Or a criminal? Or any one of a million other dysfucntional
>things?
>
>Since you know nothing about my personal life, and even less about my
>ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
>information.
It don't matter. You work things out for the sake of the children.
It's called putting your children above yourself, something you seem
not to want to do. By your own admission, you ran off on your husband.
Also by your own admission, you are shacking up with another man "a
super Aryan" who is not the child's father. That is a horrible,
horrible example to set for your children. Only someone evil would
support that kind of lifestyle.
Mike Kalvatis
than anyone else on the web. If Sara dares tries to leave Nizkor,
McVay has an encyclopedia of information on Sara.
That is where your kids names came from Sara, so make sure you sue
McVay while you are suing Ellis, it McVay who provided the information
about your kids.
Mike
On 25 Mar 2000 05:18:31 GMT, kmc...@vex.net (Kenneth McVay OBC) wrote:
>In article <catamont-240...@ts014d11.den-co.concentric.net>,
>Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
>>Since you know nothing about my personal life, and even less about my
>>ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
>>information.
>
Fledgist
>On 24 Mar 2000 23:07:12 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>How about if my husband was a drug addict? Or a child abuser? Or a
>>wife-beater? Or a lay-about who refused to work to support the family? Or
>>a cheater? Or a criminal? Or any one of a million other dysfucntional
>>things?
>>
>>ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
>>information.
>
With a child abuser? With a wife beater? With a drug addict? With a lazy
layabout?
>It's called putting your children above yourself, something you seem
>not to want to do. By your own admission, you ran off on your husband.
Why are you concerned about this?
>
>Also by your own admission, you are shacking up with another man "a
>super Aryan" who is not the child's father. That is a horrible,
>horrible example to set for your children. Only someone evil would
>support that kind of lifestyle.
Living with a "super Aryan"?
>
Fragano Ledgister
(Fled...@aol.com)
Dawn over the dark sea brings on the sun;
She leans across the hilltop: see, the light!
Mike Kalvatis
On 25 Mar 2000 15:34:38 GMT, fled...@aol.comkillspam (Fledgist)
wrote:
Jeffrey G. Brown
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>Only someone evil would support that kind of lifestyle.
Only a gutless coward lies about other people on Usenet, Mikey.
Congratulations on achieving your dream of becoming subhuman.
Orac
OBC) wrote:
>In article <catamont-240...@ts014d11.den-co.concentric.net>,
>Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>Since you know nothing about my personal life, and even less about my
>>ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
>>information.
>
>The amazing part, my friend, is that Mr. Ellis can draw a conclusion
>of any sort with virtually no brain.
Remove the word "virtually," and you'll be closer to the truth.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Sara Salzman
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>On 24 Mar 2000 23:07:12 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
>wrote:
>
>
>>
>>How about if my husband was a drug addict? Or a child abuser? Or a
>>wife-beater? Or a lay-about who refused to work to support the family? Or
>>a cheater? Or a criminal? Or any one of a million other dysfucntional
>>things?
>>
>>Since you know nothing about my personal life, and even less about my
>>ex-husband, it's amazing the conclusions you can draw with virtually no
>>information.
>
>It don't matter. You work things out for the sake of the children.
>It's called putting your children above yourself, something you seem
>not to want to do. By your own admission, you ran off on your husband.
Mr. Kalvatis' sense of right and wrong: Stay and be abused. Show your
children that being abused is the right way to live. Stay married to a
drug abused and show your children that it's the right thing to do. And
THIS is the person who claims to judge ME?
>
>Also by your own admission, you are shacking up with another man "a
>super Aryan" who is not the child's father. That is a horrible,
>horrible example to set for your children. Only someone evil would
>support that kind of lifestyle.
Kalvatis lies again.
I am legally married to my husband. My children love and respect him.
You're right. That's really evil, isn't it?
Mike Kalvatis
seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
party 100 percent.
I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
How about owing up to your sins Sara? Or how about posting your
divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
myself?
I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
Mike
On 25 Mar 2000 19:44:03 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman)
Jeffrey G. Brown
<m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
> [...deletia: yada yada yada...]
Address the issue, Mikey. Why did you lie about Sara's marital status?
beldar_...@trial.freedom.net
Dear Saltzman, and other fucking stupid Yanks.
Will you first of all, learn how to use usenet. Second of all, will you
please be more considerate about your fucking crossposting, as most don't
give a flying fuck about you being stalked by some fuck-head, and you seem
to be a fat assed piece of American shit that want's to share it with the
world.
Please be put on notice, WE DON'T GIVE A FUCK ABOUT YOUR PEYTON PLACE
BULLSHIT. It's annoying, stupid, and typical of stupid, moronic fat assed
yanks.
Just fuck off and die, and please stop the crossposting, or you will be in
deeper shit than any of your shit headed lawyers can imagine.
please remember to FUCK OFF AND DIE.
Thank you, American Assholes.
______________________________________________________________________________
Total Internet privacy -- get your Freedom pseudonym at http://www.freedom.net
Devon Wagner
dudalb
to show you Aryan courage...you guys are truly beneath contempt....not that
Sara cannot wipe the floor with you any day of the week.....
beldar_...@trial.freedom.net
So, Saltzman, do you give head?
______________________________________________________________________________
Dave McVay
> and of course you never did drugs nor abused your husband. It always
> seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
> worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
> partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
> party 100 percent.
>
> I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
You have his address and phone number...call him up. Be sure to send me the
transcripts.
> How about owing up to your sins Sara? Or how about posting your
> divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
> myself?
>
> I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
>
> Mike
>
I feel sorry for her children.
11 to eleven
Doc Tavish
I feel sorry for her dog! :-)
Doc Tavish
> 11 to eleven
David E Michael
Doc Tavish wrote:
I just hope she doesn't have a hamster.
David
Dave McVay
"Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8bju4j$dl$1...@slb7.atl.mindspring.net...
>
> On 25-Mar-2000, Mike Kalvatis <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote:
>
> > and of course you never did drugs nor abused your husband. It always
> > seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
> > worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
> > partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
> > party 100 percent.
> >
> > I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
> >
> > divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
> > myself?
> >
> > I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
> >
> > Mike
>
violence with!
> These are her very own words unedited and in exact context. Tell me if she
didn't make
> an explicit threat of harm against me in this DejaCom archive:
> http://x32.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=574979429&fmt=text
> Subject: Re: Sara Salzman's Documented Internet Threat
> Date: 01/19/2000
> Author: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
>
> [...]
>
> >> Doc Tavish
>
> >Actually, Doc, I'm married to an Ayran Superman. He's 6'6" and will be
> >delighted to kick you ass anytime anywhere.
>
> [...]
>
> >Sara
> ~~~End of DejaCom Archival Snippet~~~
Yes, it looks like a threat. Her threats are empty.
11
Jeffery Mock
"Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>
> On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>
> > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
> > > seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
> > > worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
> > > partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
> > > party 100 percent.
> > >
> > > I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
>
the
> > transcripts.
>
> > > divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
> > > myself?
> > >
> > > I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
> > >
> > > Mike
>
>
> I feel sorry for her dog! :-)
>
> Doc Tavish
That was very funny... :)
Dylan is the dog's name. Is that a jewish name?
11
Doc Tavish
On 25-Mar-2000, David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote:
> Doc Tavish wrote:
>
> > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >
> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
> > > > and of course you never did drugs nor abused your husband. It always
> > > > seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
> > > > worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
> > > > partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
> > > > party 100 percent.
> > > >
> > > > I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
> >
> > > You have his address and phone number...call him up. Be sure to send me the
> > > transcripts.
> >
> > > > How about owing up to your sins Sara? Or how about posting your
> > > > divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
> > > > myself?
> > > >
> > > > I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> >
> > > I feel sorry for her children.
> >
> > I feel sorry for her dog! :-)
> >
> > Doc Tavish
> > > 11 to eleven
> I just hope she doesn't have a hamster.
>
> David
Rumour has it that her husband has a fancy for raising gerbils! :-)
Doc Tavish
Doc Tavish
On 25-Mar-2000, "Jeffery Mock" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:8bjth...@news2.newsguy.com...
> >
> > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >
> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
> > > > and of course you never did drugs nor abused your husband. It always
> > > > seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
> > > > worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
> > > > partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
> > > > party 100 percent.
> > > >
> > > > I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
> >
> > > You have his address and phone number...call him up. Be sure to send me
> the
> > > transcripts.
> >
> > > > How about owing up to your sins Sara? Or how about posting your
> > > > divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
> > > > myself?
> > > >
> > > > I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> >
> > > I feel sorry for her children.
> >
> > I feel sorry for her dog! :-)
> >
> > Doc Tavish
>
> That was very funny... :)
>
> Dylan is the dog's name. Is that a jewish name?
I don't know but I know Jew songster Bob Dylan is a Jew and that Bob Dylan isn't his real name either! Seems that these Jews like to adopt Gentile names.
Doc Tavish
> 11
Doc Tavish
On 24-Mar-2000, Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
[...]
> >You have been very naughty Miss Sara. You have condemned others
> >for posting anonymously in the past and here you have "told on
> > yourself" for doing so.
> >
> >My Tavish cat is grinning, Bruno is laughing, I am rolling all
> >over the floor laughing and I just peed in my BVDs for laughing so hard!
> >No hard feelings now! :-)
> >
> > Your pal forever,
> > Doc Tavish
> Is she really your pal? I think she really hates you, but then
> again she is not a nice person.
She'd most likely castrate me and make my niblets into a play toy for her
dog if it were within her power (such as another Bolshevist uprising) but
what the hey! I just can't be as hateful and vindictive as her and the rest of
her Kosher Kronies. They are the true haters (of all non-Jewish humanity).
Doc Tavish
> Brimstone
Michael Ragland
charities, causes, etc. But if I did have the money I would gladly
donate to hatewatch.org. And if it helped Mr. Ellis as well that would
be great.
Michael Ragland
Fledgist
>Dear Saltzman, and other fucking stupid Yanks.
>
Have you thought of suicide?
Fledgist
>I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
>
Kalvatis=cad.
Sara Salzman
>On 25-Mar-2000, "Jeffery Mock" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>
>> "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>> news:8bjth...@news2.newsguy.com...
>> >
>> > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
>> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
>> > > > and of course you never did drugs nor abused your husband. It always
>> > > > seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
>> > > > worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
>> > > > partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
>> > > > party 100 percent.
>> > > >
>> > > > I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
>> >
>> > > You have his address and phone number...call him up. Be sure to send me
>> the
>> > > transcripts.
>> >
>> > > > How about owing up to your sins Sara? Or how about posting your
>> > > > divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
>> > > > myself?
>> > > >
>> > > > I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
>> > > >
>> > > > Mike
>> >
>> > > I feel sorry for her children.
>> >
>> > I feel sorry for her dog! :-)
>> >
>> > Doc Tavish
>>
>> That was very funny... :)
>>
>> Dylan is the dog's name. Is that a jewish name?
>
>I don't know but I know Jew songster Bob Dylan is a Jew and that Bob
Dylan isn't his real name either! Seems that these Jews like to adopt
Gentile names.
>
> Doc Tavish
>
>> 11
I can't decide which one of you is more illiterate. My dog is a Welsh
Corgi. He is named after Dylan Thomas.
Now, which one of you illiterate slugs knows who Dylan Thomas is?
Sara
PS. Bob Zimmerman, aka Dylan, chose that name for Dylan Thomas as well.
Tom Canada
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:catamont-260...@ts015d24.den-co.concentric.net...
So, a pitiful reference to a poor poet, and a terrible musician makes you
some kind of what?
Brimstone
$Hq3.1...@news2.rdc1.on.home.com>, "Tom Canada"
Brimstone
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
Brimstone
Or have your mother do it for you.
Brimstone
<doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote:
>
>On 24-Mar-2000, Brimstone
<mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>> >You have been very naughty Miss Sara. You have condemned
others
>> >for posting anonymously in the past and here you have "told
on
>> > yourself" for doing so.
>> >
>> >My Tavish cat is grinning, Bruno is laughing, I am rolling
all
>> >over the floor laughing and I just peed in my BVDs for
laughing so hard!
>> >No hard feelings now! :-)
>> >
>> > Your pal forever,
>> > Doc Tavish
>
>> Is she really your pal? I think she really hates you, but then
>> again she is not a nice person.
>
>She'd most likely castrate me and make my niblets into a play
toy for her
>dog if it were within her power (such as another Bolshevist
uprising) but
>what the hey!
bullshit....she would stir-fry them for herself.
Brimstone
I just can't be as hateful and vindictive as her and the rest of
>her Kosher Kronies. They are the true haters (of all non-Jewish
humanity).
>
> Doc Tavish
>
no_one_of_...@trial.freedom.net
I find Doc Tavish, Sara Saltzman, and Ellis noting but a waste of resources.
You useless american cunts don't deserve to be sharing my air, let alone
posting.
You all are clearly imbeciles, who have a high opinon of your useless
american fat asses, and you should all fuck off and die.
you serve no purpose.
Orac
no_one_of_...@trial.freedom.net wrote:
>I find Doc Tavish, Sara Saltzman, and Ellis noting but a waste of
>resources. You useless american cunts don't deserve to be sharing my
>air, let alone posting.
>
>You all are clearly imbeciles, who have a high opinon of your useless
>american fat asses, and you should all fuck off and die.
>
>you serve no purpose.
LOL! And you think you do? That's funny.
David E Michael
Orac wrote:
Well, he made you laugh anyway!
David
On 5 February 2000 William Daffer wrote: 'total honesty isn't required'.
On 21 November 1998 Scot Murphy wrote: 'Yes, these are newsgroups I lurked
through--though never contributed to'.
On 30 January 2000 Michael Ragland wrote: 'I must admit I have at times
done revisionist postings to confuse others and help the anti-revisionist
side. How so, well I've stated the Nazis killed millions of Jews but
Hitler didn't know about it! I realize that by acknowledging the Nazis
killed millions of Jew, even if I have demonstrated there is no proof
Hitler knew about the extermination, I have caused some damage to
revisionists.'
On 8 February 2000 Michael Ragland wrote: 'Sometimes telling half-truths,
white lies, etc. is important for self-preservation and to achieve certain
ends.'
David E Michael
Doc Tavish wrote:
> On 25-Mar-2000, David E Michael <david.e...@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > Doc Tavish wrote:
> >
> > > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
> > > > > and of course you never did drugs nor abused your husband. It always
> > > > > seems to work both ways when the other is asked. My wife is a social
> > > > > worker and has never seen an abusive situation that was strictly one
> > > > > partys fault. But yet when you ask one party, they blame the other
> > > > > party 100 percent.
> > > > >
> > > > > I bet your ex-husband probably will say you abused him etc. etc. etc.
> > >
> > > > You have his address and phone number...call him up. Be sure to send me the
> > > > transcripts.
> > >
> > > > > How about owing up to your sins Sara? Or how about posting your
> > > > > divorce decree or should I legally spend the 19 bucks and get it
> > > > > myself?
> > > > >
> > > > > I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > >
> > > > I feel sorry for her children.
> > >
> > > I feel sorry for her dog! :-)
> > >
> > > Doc Tavish
> > > > 11 to eleven
>
> > I just hope she doesn't have a hamster.
> >
> > David
>
> Rumour has it that her husband has a fancy for raising gerbils! :-)
>
> Doc Tavish
I wonder what he does with them?
David
birk...@my-deja.com
not be able too)
What makes you think I need to be either voluntarily or involuntarily
committed? In order to be involuntarily committed today you generally have to
be a threat to yourself or others although exceptions are still made when
some family members want to get rid of their children or spouses because
they're tired of them. Also, the states really don't want to take care of
these people either; its "expensive" for them and in many cases they'd rather
have the mentally ill in local communities (without providing adequate
resources for them of course) or have the correctional system take up the
slack. One of the largest "mental hospitals" in the U.S. in the Los Angeles
jail. As far as voluntarily committing yourself you generally don't get into
a state mental facility this way. You have to be civilly and involuntarily
committed. If you want to voluntaraily commit yourself you'd check in to your
local hospital and you wouldn't stay there much longer than two weeks. You'd
like to see me in the "hospital" longer than just two weeks, wouldn't you Mr.
Ellis? Why don't you be honest. You'd like to see locked up in a cage until I
die or better yet, "Fuck the straitjacket, give him the gas." Right? I'm
just fine Mr. Ellis. An anti-revisionist, disability activist, social
activist of the "Gandhiesque type". Oh, I know you and your fellow ilk have
brought up my "horribly violent" criminal past, my extensive criminal record
dating back to when I was six years old, and my "sexually perverted" and
"totally deranged" postings on usenet which clearly demonstrate I'm a threat
to all decent law abiding people. Hogwash! You despise creativity and
originality and most importantly anything "different" from your preconceived
ideas which are a facsimile of others preconceptions. You have a historical
arsenal to rely upon. See, these great men told the truth about the blacks
and Jews! It's pathetic Mr. Ellis. Although you as an individual may be a
crackpot (some would say definitely) the ideas of others which you claim as
representative of your own really do have wide currency around the world. A
shame.
Michael Ragland
In article <0f0638e8...@usw-ex0104-031.remarq.com>,
Brimstone <mr_brimsto...@excite.com.invalid> wrote:
> Have you ever though about committing yourself?
>
> Or have your mother do it for you.
>
> Brimstone
>
> * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network *
> The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!
>
>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
sjw
>
> cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
> >In article <8bkbm...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com wrote:
> >
> >>On 25-Mar-2000, "Jeffery Mock" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
> >>> news:8bjth...@news2.newsguy.com...
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
> >>> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
>
> >>
> >>I don't know but I know Jew songster Bob Dylan is a Jew and that Bob
> >Dylan isn't his real name either! Seems that these Jews like to adopt
> >Gentile names.
> >>
> >> Doc Tavish
> >>
> >>> 11
> >
> >I can't decide which one of you is more illiterate. My dog is a Welsh
> >Corgi. He is named after Dylan Thomas.
> >
> >Now, which one of you illiterate slugs knows who Dylan Thomas is?
>
>
> (I have a script of *the* original 1947 radio play: "Under Milk Wood"
> I wonder what it's worth? The writer was a good friend of my father.
> Also in the cast, a Welsh narrator. Care to guess his name? :-) ).
Ummmmmm.....How about Richard Burton?
Steve
Gord McFee
2000 19:44:03 EST, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
> >Also by your own admission, you are shacking up with another man "a
> >super Aryan" who is not the child's father. That is a horrible,
> >horrible example to set for your children. Only someone evil would
> >support that kind of lifestyle.
>
> Kalvatis lies again.
>
> I am legally married to my husband. My children love and respect him.
> You're right. That's really evil, isn't it?
Well, it annoys Mikey, who I suspect is married to his right hand.
--
Gord McFee
I'll write no line before its time
Visit the Holocaust History Project
http://www.holocaust-history.org
Visit the Nizkor site
http://www.nizkor.org
Gord McFee
-0500, beldar_...@trial.freedom.net wrote:
> So, Saltzman, do you give head?
I hear you do.
Gord McFee
"dudalb" <dud...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I feel sorry for you two Neo Nazi morons who have to attack a mother of two
> to show you Aryan courage...you guys are truly beneath contempt....not that
> Sara cannot wipe the floor with you any day of the week.....
The last original idea Michael or Ellis had twirled down the toilet
bowl.
Sara Salzman
<re...@perdrix.demon.co.uk > wrote:
>cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>>In article <8bkbm...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
wrote:
>>
>>>On 25-Mar-2000, "Jeffery Mock" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:8bjth...@news2.newsguy.com...
>>>> >
>>>> > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
>>>> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
>
>>>> Dylan is the dog's name. Is that a jewish name?
>>>
>>>I don't know but I know Jew songster Bob Dylan is a Jew and that Bob
>>Dylan isn't his real name either! Seems that these Jews like to adopt
>>Gentile names.
>>>
>>> Doc Tavish
>>>
>>>> 11
>>
>>I can't decide which one of you is more illiterate. My dog is a Welsh
>>Corgi. He is named after Dylan Thomas.
>>
>>Now, which one of you illiterate slugs knows who Dylan Thomas is?
>
>"Do not go softly into that good night...."
>
>(I have a script of *the* original 1947 radio play: "Under Milk Wood"
>I wonder what it's worth? The writer was a good friend of my father.
>Also in the cast, a Welsh narrator. Care to guess his name? :-) ).
>
Hmm. Welsh... Burton perhaps?
I didn't have that recording, but my family did have a record of Dylan
Thomas reading "A Child's Christman in Wales." we used to listen to it
around the holidays every year. So much more pleasing than "The Night
Before Christmas....
Um, and I believe it's "Do not go GENTLE into that good night, rage, rage
against the dying of the light."
:)
Sara
trimmed to ar, since I sincerely doubt any of the clods in alt.politics.
nationalism.white or alt.politics.white-power could understand any of it.
Sara Salzman
<gmc...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>In <sdr33jc...@corp.supernews.com>, on Sat, 25 Mar 2000 19:54:21
>-0500, beldar_...@trial.freedom.net wrote:
>
>> So, Saltzman, do you give head?
>
>I hear you do.
>
well, he certainly doesn't give good spelling... :)
Favorite bit of theater graffiti:
Edith Head gives good costume.
Sara
Fledgist
>cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
>
>>In article <8bkbm...@news2.newsguy.com>, doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
>wrote:
>>
>>>On 25-Mar-2000, "Jeffery Mock" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:8bjth...@news2.newsguy.com...
>>>> >
>>>> > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in message
>>>> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
>
>>>> Dylan is the dog's name. Is that a jewish name?
>>>
>>>I don't know but I know Jew songster Bob Dylan is a Jew and that Bob
>>Dylan isn't his real name either! Seems that these Jews like to adopt
>>Gentile names.
>>>
>>> Doc Tavish
>>>
>>>> 11
>>
>>I can't decide which one of you is more illiterate. My dog is a Welsh
>>Corgi. He is named after Dylan Thomas.
>>
>>Now, which one of you illiterate slugs knows who Dylan Thomas is?
>
>"Do not go softly into that good night...."
"Do not go gently into that good night..."
>
>(I have a script of *the* original 1947 radio play: "Under Milk Wood"
>I wonder what it's worth? The writer was a good friend of my father.
>Also in the cast, a Welsh narrator. Care to guess his name? :-) ).
>
Burton?
>>
>>Sara
>>
>>PS. Bob Zimmerman, aka Dylan, chose that name for Dylan Thomas as well.
>
Fragano Ledgister
Buck Turgidson
> In article <a7pD4.74307
> $Hq3.1...@news2.rdc1.on.home.com>, "Tom Canada"
> <tomc...@nospamhotmail.invalid_mcmx> wrote:
> >
> >"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
> >news:catamont-260...@ts015d24.den-co.concentric.net...
> >> In article <8bkbm...@news2.newsguy.com>,
> doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 25-Mar-2000, "Jeffery Mock" <postm...@thundernet.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Doc Tavish" <doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com> wrote in
> message
> >> >> news:8bjth...@news2.newsguy.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On 25-Mar-2000, "Dave McVay" <postm...@thundernet.org>
> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > "Mike Kalvatis" <m...@administrator.usna.net> wrote in
> message
> >> >> > > news:u8pqdsosum1emooc5...@4ax.com...
> >> >> That was very funny... :)
> >> >>
> >> >> Dylan is the dog's name. Is that a jewish name?
> >> >
> >> >I don't know but I know Jew songster Bob Dylan is a Jew and
> that Bob
> >> Dylan isn't his real name either! Seems that these Jews like
> to adopt
> >> Gentile names.
> >> >
> >> > Doc Tavish
> >> >
> >> >> 11
> >>
> >> I can't decide which one of you is more illiterate. My dog is
> a Welsh
> >> Corgi. He is named after Dylan Thomas.
> >>
> >> Now, which one of you illiterate slugs knows who Dylan Thomas
> is?
> >>
> >> Sara
> >>
> >> PS. Bob Zimmerman, aka Dylan, chose that name for Dylan
> Thomas as well.
> >
> >
> >So, a pitiful reference to a poor poet, and a terrible musician
> makes you
> >some kind of what?
> >
> >
> >
> Maybe she likes the boy-lover Allen Ginsberg as well.
You know, Ellis, as repellent and disruptive as your posts are, I am in some way
a small bit thankful for them. We assert that you Revisionists are miniature
minds with bankrupt morals, unwilling to discuss in *any* way the subject you
seem to feel brought you here, and respond with undignified spew. You respond
with hate, filth, crap, and harassment of a woman and her children. Her
*children,* for the love of God. And somehow, you think involving them is fair.
All I can say is, thank you for proving us right every single day, post after
post after post. There is nothing about history that entertains your desiccated
little minds. All you have is hate.
-- --Dep
"Always tell the truth. It's the § "Truth is just...truth. You can't
easiest thing to remember." § have opinions about truth."
--David Mamet --Peter Schickele
Like short-haired women? Snotty comments? Penguins?
http://members.aol.com/deppitybob/shlu/PAGEONE.html
Buck Turgidson
> >
> > > I just hope she doesn't have a hamster.
> > >
> > > David
> >
> > Rumour has it that her husband has a fancy for raising gerbils! :-)
> >
> > Doc Tavish
>
> I wonder what he does with them?
Sells them to itinerant Brits with more lather than logic and more venality than
civility, would be my guess.
Buck Turgidson
> >
> >I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
> >
>
> Kalvatis=cad.
If I may be so bold, I rather think "Kalvatis" is a cur.
Henry Cotter
>Only a gutless coward lies about other people
> on Usenet,
Ah, so they do. You should know as you are the quintesential liar and
coward. The bottom of what Usenet has to offer. Not even a troll but a
poor soul who has decided to live his life as a shut-in posting every
hour on the hour to the Usenet. 35,000 posts in 4 years? Something
tells me you don't have a job.
Anyways folks as you can see this is a demented little coward, libeler,
and liar who's content to sit at his computer day and night not
exchanging ideas nor expanding his bigoted mind in the least. Instead
he spends his time growling at his monitor trying his very best to crush
the freedom of speech on Usenet newsgroups by soiling any rational
debate with worthless trash. He's both morally and intellectually
crippled.
Notice how he never advances a single thesis of his own and when asked
to provide proof that he has he claims he did but offers no proof. But
then notice that to him no proof will ever be good enough for him to be
proven wrong. Also notice how he posts the same spam from post to post
without any variety. The words "liar, coward, gutless, moron, idiot,
etc." have absolutely no meaning to him. He uses the words on the
misguided notion that somehow anyone with a brain cell would accept his
"arguments" as anything more than mindless garbage.
Even the ones who would agree with him on both a moral and intellectual
ground are silent at his defense because they too realize how much of a
boob he really is. Instead of him shooting his enemies down with a
thought provoking post he weakens his side with lame ad hominum attacks
and worthless smears. The only person I've ever seen to go so far as to
defend our resident chickenhawk would be "Ms." Sara
("Salzman/Tucker/whatever the poster wants their last name to be this
month- which is funny coming from one who thinks that calling others
anonymous cowards somehow weakens their arguments. It's the perfect
irony that most people project their own faults on others and then
attack. They're normally attacking a trait within themselves they're
too ashamed to admit they have and would like to change.)
I know it's been said a thousand times before on these groups but please
killfile or simply ignore the lame "Jeffrey G. Brown." As most on both
sides of the coin know, he's simply a smearer with nothing in his life
going for him other than imaginary battles on Usenet.
Henry Cotter
Voice of Sanity
Sara Salzman
mano...@webtv.net (Henry Cotter) wrote:
Please provide any evidence that I have posted under any other name than
Sara Salzman in ... oh... the last three years?
And while you're at it, you might consider providing some proof that JGB
is a "chickenhawk," like an arrest record?
sjw
invent a new nym just to attack him? Henry Cotter, my ass.
Steve
Henry Cotter wrote:
Fledgist
>Fledgist wrote:
>
>> >
>> >I bet you think your shit don't stink, do you?
>> >
>>
>> Kalvatis=cad.
>
>If I may be so bold, I rather think "Kalvatis" is a cur.
>
>
>
>-- --Dep
>
That's unfair to dogs.
Jeffrey G. Brown
>You should know as you are the quintesential liar and coward.
Do cite instances in which I have lied, little insect.
> [...deletia...]
>35,000 posts in 4 years? Something tells me you don't have a job.
Something tells me you don't know how to read those posts.
JGB
=======================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jg_b...@deja.com
For centuries, philosophers and theologians have debated what it means
to be human. Perhaps the answer has eluded us because it is so simple.
To be human is to choose. - "The Outer Limits: Feasibility Study", 1997
Mike Kalvatis OBC
will accuse you of stalking her, but in reality, she will stalk you.
Oh, she posted as schw...@infinet.com in 1997. Among many other
nicknames she used. Perrrfect is another one she used. Remember, she
is perfect according to herself. Sara will consider this to be
stalking I am sure.
Jeffrey G. Brown is Sara's parrot. All he can say after several
10,000s of postings is liar liar. Just do any search on him and that
is all you will see from that parrot. As for him being a chicken hawk,
again I urge you to do a deja archive on him. That will answer the
question about him being a chicken hawk.
Mike..
Orac
mano...@webtv.net (Henry Cotter) wrote:
>I know it's been said a thousand times before on these groups but please
>killfile or simply ignore the lame "Jeffrey G. Brown." As most on both
>sides of the coin know, he's simply a smearer with nothing in his life
>going for him other than imaginary battles on Usenet.
>
Obviously you haven't bothered to take your own advice, as you just replied to
one of Jeff's posts. So why should anyone else take it?
Doc Tavish
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Kalvatis still lying
Date: 28 Mar 2000 00:22:43 EST
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Message-ID: <catamont-270...@ts006d47.den-co.concentric.net>
On 27-Mar-2000, cata...@concentric.net (Sara Salzman) wrote:
[...]
> And while you're at it, you might consider providing some proof that JGB
> is a "chickenhawk," like an arrest record?
Can you prove that Jeffrey G. Brown is NOT a vicious and most virulent form
of predator aka a "chickenhawk?" :-)
Didn't he once comment about how he liked "pee pees" and a fellow Jew of
yours documented it as in:
http://www.deja.com/=dnc/getdoc.xp?AN=273582033&fmt=text
From: leibo...@hotmail.com (Joel Leibovitz)
Subject: NAMBLA ADVOCATE OUTS HIMSELF?
Date: 18 Sep 1997 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <3420ea09...@news.mathbox.com>
Organization: Science Fiction Writer
Reply-To: leibo...@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: alt.politics.white-power,alt.politics.nationalism.white,
alt.politics.homosexuality
From:
jeff_...@bigfoot.com (Jeffrey G. Brown)
Subject:
Re: Strom Lies
Date:
Fri, 06 Jun 1997 00:15:32 -0400
Organization:
None
Message-ID:
<jeff_brown-ya024080...@news.zippo.com>
References:
<1.5.4.16.1997052...@earthlink.net>
<3391CC...@earthlink.net>
<3394A3...@bcpl.lib.md.us>
<339502...@earthlink.net> <339691...@ix.netcom.com>
<339757...@earthlink.net>
X-Newsreader:
Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.4.0
Newsgroups:
triangle.politics, alt.politics.white-power, alt.revisionism,
alt.politics.nationalism.white, alt.politics.correct
References:
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9
NSWPP wrote:
>
> >
> > Jeffrey G. Brown wrote:
> >
> > I belong to NAMBLA and I am gay; I can butt fuck little boys all day.
> >
> > >
> > > JGB
> > >
> > > ================================================
> > > Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
> > > "What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
>
> Dear Mr. Brown,
>
> I thought the Church of the Creator was defunct?
>
> -WS
Harry, I love to nibble young boys pee pees also.
JGB
================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
~~~~End of Exact DejaCom Archive~~~~
Your fellow Jew Leibovitz even documented Jeffrey as a devourer
of young "pee pees"-- what other proof do you need? Would Joel
Leibovitz (a Jew) lie?
Your pal always,
Doc Tavish
> Sara
>
> --
Doc Tavish
Jeffrey is the most mentally twisted cock sucker you will ever encounter.
Notice that his whole life seems to revolve around targeted certain
USENETIZENS and his continual abuse against them as people. Once
he latches on to a victim he positively will not let up. This sort of behaviour
is indeed profiled by psychologists. Watch how he'll latch on to this very
post and see what he says concerning the truth!
What other than a sick and diseased mind will spend day after day stalking
and abusing total strangers? Jeffrey G. Brown!
Doc Tavish
> Mike..
Ed Kadach
Well stated!
Racialist regards,
Ed kadach
sjw
>
> sjw <sjw...@erols.com> wrote:> [...]
>
> >> >I can't decide which one of you is more illiterate. My dog is a Welsh
> >> >Corgi. He is named after Dylan Thomas.
> >> >
> >> >Now, which one of you illiterate slugs knows who Dylan Thomas is?
> >>
> >>
> >> I wonder what it's worth? The writer was a good friend of my father.
> >> Also in the cast, a Welsh narrator. Care to guess his name? :-) ).
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Steve
>
Sorry, but I lost your house in a poker game two weeks ago. Oh, well,
easy come, easy go. :>)
Steve
Jeffrey G. Brown
OBC <ex...@nospam.com> wrote:
>Jeffrey G. Brown is Sara's parrot. All he can say after several
>10,000s of postings is liar liar.
Actually, no. My posts on topics other than the liars that inhabit these
newsgroups have been pointed out before, Mikey. As usual, you haven't been
paying attention.
>Just do any search on him and that is all you will see from that parrot.
As already pointed out, you're wrong again, Mikey.
>As for him being a chicken hawk,
>again I urge you to do a deja archive on him. That will answer the
>question about him being a chicken hawk.
Really, Mikey? How will unfounded accusations made by anonymous cowards
"answer" any questions about me?
Mike Kalvatis OBC
postings.
Mike
On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:43:43 -0700, Ed Kadach <edd...@connect.ab.ca>
wrote:
>Doc Tavish wrote:
>>
>> On 28-Mar-2000, Mike Kalvatis OBC <ex...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Be careful, if you find proof, which is really easy on deja.com, she
>> > will accuse you of stalking her, but in reality, she will stalk you.
>> >
>> > Oh, she posted as schw...@infinet.com in 1997. Among many other
>> > nicknames she used. Perrrfect is another one she used. Remember, she
>> > is perfect according to herself. Sara will consider this to be
>> > stalking I am sure.
>> >
>> > Jeffrey G. Brown is Sara's parrot. All he can say after several
>> > 10,000s of postings is liar liar. Just do any search on him and that
>> > is all you will see from that parrot. As for him being a chicken hawk,
>> > again I urge you to do a deja archive on him. That will answer the
>> > question about him being a chicken hawk.
>>