What Does the ADL Think?
Dan Parker
see what is being said about Jews and who is saying it. That's a bit of an
understatement, in fact. You could safely bet the ranch that they spy on
those of us with even a little knowledge of how the Jewish Talmudic Tyranny
works and are willing to discuss it in public fora.
The only thing that is interesting about this is that we are largely
accurate in our understanding and description of how the Khazars work--their
genocidal ambitions to destroy the Aryan race; how they control the media
and the bounds of what is permissable to think and question and say; the
fact that the Holohoax is just that, a hoax; and so forth. While many Whites
and not a few Jews are largely ignorant of it all, believing that it's as
black and white as they argue it to be--Jews are innocent, neo-Nazis are
evil racists and antisemites, Jews are unjustly persecuted--the ADL knows
the score and when they lurk on these newsgroups and other fora, they can
certainly see that we are telling the truth.
In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception, as
soon as I saw that a number of people knew what I was up to, that would be
the end of the game. I couldn't carry on the ruse any longer. Of course the
Jew is playing for keeps. This is not a game for him, and stakes are not
only very much real, but for the Jew, represents everything. Zionism is a
dangerous gambit, and it is made all the more so by it being in a sense an
all or nothing game. There is very little room for compromise.
The assassinations that Jews have committed since Isnotreal became a Jewish
state in '48 are just one indication of how important that little patch of
desert in the Middle East is to them. The extent to which they are
willing--eager it could be said--to manipulate American foreign policy and
the sedition in which they have been and still are engaged, are yet more
evidence of how desperate they are to realize the ambitions of Zionism.
While Jews keep a close watch on us in cyberspace, and no doubt in the 3D
world as well, we are obviously not a serious threat to them, or we would
have found it out the hard way some time ago. Still, they know they are
engaged in a massive fraud--I should say frauds--and they can see that we
know it. While I have zero interest in playing chicken with these
bloodthirsty Mongols, I do find this somewhat intriguing. I'd like to watch
them as much as they are watching me.
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown
Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
would not have admitted to lying.
JGB
=====================================================================
Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
"What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>In article <ETJc2.159$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
>Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
>>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
>
>That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
>would not have admitted to lying.
>
>JGB
Brown, you are a liar. I never admitted to lying anywhere, anytime. I have
not admitted to lying because I have not lied.
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown
Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>>In article <ETJc2.159$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
>>Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>>
>>>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
>>
>>That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
>>would not have admitted to lying.
>>
>>JGB
>
>Brown, you are a liar. I never admitted to lying anywhere, anytime. I have
>not admitted to lying because I have not lied.
Absolutely false.
In a message entitled "Re: Thanksgiving Proclamation"
<http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=415364087>, Dan Parker stated:
'The "Native Americans" were invited to the first Pilgram's Thanksgiving
dinner also, Dribbledy. The Pilgrams thought it would be a nice change
in their diet. The "Native Americans" were accustomed to eating each
other and the odd Pilgram they could single out from time to time.'
When challenged to back this up with factual evidence, Parker stated
<http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=416209357>:
"I was not making a factual statement."
Parker is, by his own admission, a liar.
JGB
Yale F. Edeiken
> Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
> >In article <ETJc2.159$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
> >Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
> >>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
> >That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
> >would not have admitted to lying.
> Brown, you are a liar. I never admitted to lying anywhere, anytime. I have
> not admitted to lying because I have not lied.
Then will you explain this post of yours?
From: Dan Parker <dpa...@intrstar.net>
Subject: Kristalnacht Clear
Date: Thursday, November 19, 1998 3:48 AM
>It's wailing time again!
And this miserable excuse for a scholar decided to wail a
bit.
>The reason malarkey flourishes is simply because most people are
>simply too damned lazy to check up on anything -- and the manure
>spreaders and gossip peddlers know that.
And, in apparent belief in this canard, the author spreads
enough malarkey to fertilize every rose garden in New York State.
Apparently he hopes no one will check up on him.
He was wrong.
>I wrote the following about 6 years ago, when FAEM was a paper,
>and it is still timely -- as most everything I write is:
Only for connoisseurs of intellectual dishonesty -- as most
everything you write is. The discerning reader will note that
this author did not provide a single place where his "facts" can
be checked. There is a good reason for this, to most people the
imagination of a bigot is hardly an authoritative source.
CRYSTAL NUTS or the
NIGHT OF THE BROKEN BEER BOTTLES
>November 10, 1938 was a day that will go down in infamy, Jewish
>infamy, that is. What was a few hours of vandalism in Nazi
>Germany became kosherized into an event which surpassed Watts,
>Los Angeles, Detroit
Which, as anyone familiar with the facts knows, is correct.
The discerning reader will note the interesting propaganda
technique employed by the author. He states conclusions based
upon his bigoted assumptions first. The hope here is that after
his version of Kristalnacht is dismissed as the nonsense it is,
the impression he attempted to create will linger.
>look up the New York Times for November 11-14, 1938. You'll find
>out what the reporters said happened which is very much
>different from what the Jews said happened decades after the
>fact.
Note that the author fails to point out that a secret
investigation was held by the Nazis on November 12, 1938. The
explicit findings by Goering and others is accurately reflected
by the accounts which this author disparages.
>Contrary to what you've been told, Nazi Germany was open to
>American reporters and the Germans were fond of showing off to
>the world the depression they weren't in.
Now we encounter the first outright lie. Note that the
author does not cite a single source which makes such a claim.
Perhaps he has never heard of "Berlin Diary" by William Shirer.
> Even Col. Charles Lindberg travelled extensively
>throughout the country, happily reporting about the miracle of
>Nazi Germany.
Don't you just love the word "even" which begins this. The
author uses it to imply that there was some reason Lindberg would
not be welcome. Lindberg was a sympathizer with Nazi doctrine
who accepted a medal from Hitler personally. His wife was a
convinced Nazi.
>A world famous reporter, Louis Lochner, was on hand to see all
>of the whoopee which commenced about 2:00 AM on that Thursday
>morning.
The author left out, for some reason, the manner in which it
commenced. On November 9, Goebbels was addressing a meeting of
gaulieters where he announced that the time for "revenge" against
Jews had arrived. With his explicit approval the gaulieters
rushed to phones and started the SA on the road to Kristallnacht.
For some reason the author fails to note the direct participation
of the Nazi hierarchy with Kristallnacht. [report from Walter
Buch, chief judge of the Nazi party, to Goering, February 13,
1939] This failure totally demolishes his comparison of
Kristallnacht with urban riots. The former was initiated by the
government; the latter were not.
>Until the New York Times was subverted into being a salesman for
>the bagel industry,
The author is apparently unaware that the ownership of the
New York Times has never changed. It has been owed by the same
family since that time.
> it was a decent paper which reported the following:
Note that no references to where these "facts" appear. Nor
is there one bit of reference to later reporting which makes hash
of these statements.
>(1) When the news of the outbreak of vandalism reached the
>proper authorities, police were immediately dispatched to put an
>end to it. By 10:00 AM that morning, about 8 hours after it
>began, the police had everything under control and the violence
>was stopped.
Rubbish. First, it was the "proper authorities" who
initiated the violence. On November 10, 1939, Goebbels later
wrote, "He [Hitler] decides demonstrations should be allowed to
continue. The police should be withdrawn." [quoted in
Friedlander "Nazi Germany and the Jews" 1997; page 272]
Second, Heydrich's orders to the police was not to end the
violence. It's primary objective was to prevent the violence
spreading to German businesses. [Heydrich's order can be found at
IMT, Vol 31; Exhibit PS-3051]. The explicit orders were that no
arrests were to be made for destroying Jewish property; arrests
were to be made only for looting. Further an order was issues at
the same time to round up Jews-- "especially rich ones."
>(2) There were no uniforms observed except those worn by the
>arresting police.
Garbage. Many of the S.A. wore their uniforms. [Report of
David Buffam, American Counsel General in Leipzig, who witnessed
the violence, November 21, 1938] Likewise there are eyewitness
accounts cited in Martin Gilbert's "The Holocaust" indicating
that uniforms were worn.
>(3) No one was killed. The only person who died from violence
>that morning was a Pole, living in Berlin, who got into a tangle
>with a burglar.
Baloney. According to Goering's report on November 12, 91
Jews were murdered during the violence [IMT Vol 28; Exhibit PS-1816]. Hedrich's initial
report on November 11, gave the death
toll as 36. This was later corrected in the report cited above.
The death of a Polish Jew was reported directly to Goebbels
at 2:00 a.m. His response was, according to Buch in terms of
"not getting upset because of a dead Jew."
This death toll does not count the 2,000 Jews who died in
Dachau after being kidnapped and held for ransom after
Krystallnachtl.
>(4) Many Germans were arrested along with a handful of Jews.
Horse manure. Not once but twice.
The arrests were only for looting. By letter of the
Ministry of Justice only cases of looting or where the damage or
violence was done for "selfish" reasons. [Buch report]
The "handful" of Jews arrested was 30,000. The arrests
continued until, at least November 23. Why 30,000? Heydrich's
instructions [cited above] was that as many Jews were to be
arrested as could be held in existing facilities. 2,000 of those
Jews were never released. They died in the two months it took to
raise their ransom.
>(5) At least 8 Germans were convicted and sentenced to 2 years
>in jail and others were sentenced to 6 months in a concentration
>labor camp.
Bat guano. All prosecutions were for looting. The Ministry
of Justice [cited above] states that unless there was a motive
other than personal gain, destruction of Jewish property or
violence against Jews was not to be prosecuted. [Buch Report]
Further it should be noted that during the violence 7,500
businesses were vandalized and 267 synagogues destroyed [Buch
Report]. Considering this scale of destruction, EIGHT
convictions of looters is hardly evidence of a serious
prosecution.
>(6) Of the Jews who were arrested, none were convicted of
>anything and all were released shortly after Hanukkah (before
>Christmas).
Drivel. Start with the obvious. Why the hell should any
have been arrested at all? They were the VICTIMS of the
violence. Not all were released. 2,000 died while under
"arrest."
The real lie, however, is in the purpose of the brutal
incarceration. It was extortion. A meeting was held on November
12, where the financial matters were discussed in light of
Hitler's direct order that the Jews were to bear all costs. At
the meeting it was decided that the 30,000 Jews held hostage
would be released on the payment of 1,000,000,000 marks. They
were released only upon the payment of this ransom. [the full
text of this meeting can be found at IMT vol. 28, page 499 ff.]
>(7) All damaged Jewish property was HEAVILY insured.
At last the author gets something right. The German
businessmen followed normal business practices. It seems to come
as a surprise to this author. Nevertheless, after a string of
fraudulent misrepresentations, it is heartening to see that he
got SOMETHING right.
Unfortunately the something is a lie by omission. The
majority of those insured were "Aryans."
>(8) ALL insurance companies paid off the beneficiaries FAR IN
>EXCESS of the actual value.
An outright lie. As decided at the November 12 meeting, the
insurance companies were required to pay losses. They did not,
however, pay the beneficiaries per Hitler's direct order that the
Jews were to bear all costs of the damage. The money was paid
directly to the Nazi party. [source cited above] Thus now
damages were paid to Jewish insureds. The only ones who could
have received this alleged overpayments were "Aryans."
>Like the proverbial fish that got away, Krystallnacht stories
>get longer by the decade.
Since the facts the author ignores, almost without
exception, cited from Nazi party documents prepared within a year
of the event and established at the Nuremberg trial in 1946, it
is significant that the damage done by this officially sanctioned
violence has remained constant over the year. The fact that the
author can cite no examples, is a sure indication that the only
thing that is growing is his nose.
> The lesson to be learned, from the above, is that when business
>is bad, why depend upon Jewish-lightning when you could have a
>Krystallnacht?
The real lesson to be learned is the paucity of honesty and
lack of competence as a researcher of the author. He makes eight
statements about Kristallnacht. Of them, seven are demonstrably
false and the remaining one a commonplace assertion that
businessmen buy insurance.
Other than the observations that this bigoted author has no
credibility and that his account was created out of whole cloth,
it reflects the utter lack of rational basis for his anti-Semitism. He does not rely on fact or
history, preferring to
base his hatred on misrepresentations, distortions, and outright
lies.
It is risible that he expects his venom to be taken
seriously.
--YFE
The Holocaust History Project is at http://www.holocaust-history.org/
The Nizkor Project is at http://www.nizkor.org/
The Einsatzgruppen page is at http://www.pgonline.com/electriczen/
The Cybrary of the Holocaust is at http://www.remember.org/
Dan Parker
Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
>>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>>>In article <ETJc2.159$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
>>>Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
>>>
>>>That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
>>>would not have admitted to lying.
>>>
>>
>>Brown, you are a liar. I never admitted to lying anywhere, anytime. I have
>>not admitted to lying because I have not lied.
>
>
>In a message entitled "Re: Thanksgiving Proclamation"
><http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=415364087>, Dan Parker stated:
>
> 'The "Native Americans" were invited to the first Pilgram's Thanksgiving
> dinner also, Dribbledy. The Pilgrams thought it would be a nice change
> in their diet. The "Native Americans" were accustomed to eating each
> other and the odd Pilgram they could single out from time to time.'
>
>When challenged to back this up with factual evidence, Parker stated
><http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=416209357>:
>
> "I was not making a factual statement."
>
>Parker is, by his own admission, a liar.
>
No, Brown, you dumbass Bolshevik, that is not an admission of a lie. I did
not tell a lie, I did not admit that I told a lie.
For the last time: I wrote something that was obviously a joke. It was so
obvious that I should never have had to have explained that it was a
sarcastic joke. You are just plain stupid Brown. You've been trying to claim
that the joke was a lie and that my explanation that it was a joke was an
admission that I lied.
I don't know what sort of massive head injury you suffered long ago, Brown.
Nor do I care. A horse kicked you in the head, or something, evidently. But
that is not my concern. I only care that your scrambled brains cause you to
accuse everyone of being a liar.
You really need to seek help and work on controlling your urge to call
everyone a liar. Richard Phillips has pointed out that you don't work, so
you're not at risk of calling someone at work a liar and have them give you
yet another massive head injury. But, if you don't try to correct this
problem you have, you might call the wrong person a liar.
Dan Parker
Joel Rosenberg
Dan Parker wrote in message ...
At least two more lies, Porker. Your father must be so proud.
Go peddle your mother.
Jeffrey G. Brown
Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
> [...deletia...]
>>In a message entitled "Re: Thanksgiving Proclamation"
>><http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=415364087>, Dan Parker stated:
>>
>> 'The "Native Americans" were invited to the first Pilgram's Thanksgiving
>> dinner also, Dribbledy. The Pilgrams thought it would be a nice change
>> in their diet. The "Native Americans" were accustomed to eating each
>> other and the odd Pilgram they could single out from time to time.'
>>
>>When challenged to back this up with factual evidence, Parker stated
>><http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=416209357>:
>>
>> "I was not making a factual statement."
>>
>>Parker is, by his own admission, a liar.
>
>No, Brown, you dumbass Bolshevik, that is not an admission of a lie. I did
>not tell a lie, I did not admit that I told a lie.
Parker lied when he claimed that Native Americans ate Pilgrims. He then
admitted that his claim was "not... a factual statement" -- i.e., a lie.
>For the last time: I wrote something that was obviously a joke.
Nope. You backpedalled and claimed it was a joke _after_ you were
challenged to provide evidence to support your claim. _That_ is obvious.
Brian Blank
<dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>
>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>>In article <GJfd2.1249$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
>>Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
>>>>In article <ETJc2.159$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
>>>>Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
>>>>
>>>>That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
>>>>would not have admitted to lying.
>>>>
>>>>JGB
>>>
>>>Brown, you are a liar. I never admitted to lying anywhere, anytime. I have
>>>not admitted to lying because I have not lied.
>>
>>Absolutely false.
>>
>>In a message entitled "Re: Thanksgiving Proclamation"
>><http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=415364087>, Dan Parker stated:
>>
>> 'The "Native Americans" were invited to the first Pilgram's Thanksgiving
>> dinner also, Dribbledy. The Pilgrams thought it would be a nice change
>> in their diet. The "Native Americans" were accustomed to eating each
>> other and the odd Pilgram they could single out from time to time.'
>>
>>When challenged to back this up with factual evidence, Parker stated
>><http://x1.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=416209357>:
>>
>> "I was not making a factual statement."
>>
>>Parker is, by his own admission, a liar.
>>
>
>
>No, Brown, you dumbass Bolshevik, that is not an admission of a lie. I did
>not tell a lie, I did not admit that I told a lie.
>
>For the last time: I wrote something that was obviously a joke. It was so
>obvious that I should never have had to have explained that it was a
>sarcastic joke. You are just plain stupid Brown. You've been trying to claim
>that the joke was a lie and that my explanation that it was a joke was an
>admission that I lied.
>
>I don't know what sort of massive head injury you suffered long ago, Brown.
>Nor do I care. A horse kicked you in the head, or something, evidently. But
>that is not my concern. I only care that your scrambled brains cause you to
>accuse everyone of being a liar.
>
>You really need to seek help and work on controlling your urge to call
>everyone a liar. Richard Phillips has pointed out that you don't work, so
>you're not at risk of calling someone at work a liar and have them give you
>yet another massive head injury. But, if you don't try to correct this
>problem you have, you might call the wrong person a liar.
>
>Dan Parker
>
>
>>JGB
>>
>>=====================================================================
>>Jeffrey G. Brown jeff_...@bigfoot.com
>> "What's going to happen?" "Something wonderful..." -- '2010'
>
Funny isn't it, that you still refuse to answer this which amply
demonstrates that you are a liar?
Of course, Mr. Parker is both a liar and afraid to answer questions
viz:
Let's see an example of your posting evidence shall we, Mr. Parker?
On Mon, 07 Dec 1998 15:10:12 GMT, nota...@earthlinkspamblocker.net
(Brian Blank) wrote:
>>>Mr. Parker,
>>>
>>>I have never made threats to you or to anybody else either on this
>>>newsgroup or in other kind of media.
>>>
>>>I have never made any reference to your family either on this or in
>>>any other media.
>>>
>>
>>Yes you did, you liar. The following is the threat I made to you which you
>>excerpted from the post in which you made filthy remarks about the women in
>>my family:
>>
>>* * *
>>>> On Thu,10 Sept 1998 19:59:15 -0400, Dan Parker <dpa...@intrstar.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >Don't respond with some quip inviting me to try it. I'm not going to go
>>anywhere to commit any
>>>> >crimes and you're too much of a chickenshit to come here to me, where I
>>most certainly would
>>>> >slam my fist into your black heart so hard that it would stop beating
>>yesterday. Try me you
>>>> >weasel; otherwise, don't even bother to take up this matter."
>>>>
>>
>>
>>* * *
>>
>>Now, I have the same message in my archive and I can post the whole thing,
>>but you need to prove that you are not a liar. You post the whole message
>>and you and everyone else will see. I do have the whole message here, and
>>I'll check to see if you alter it.
>>
>>Post the whole message, you lying bastard.
>>
>>Dan Parker
>>
>I have never made any remarks about your family. I notice that you are
>unable to produce any such remarks. They do not exist.
>Unlike you I do not make such remarks.
>Your threats came about because I called you an idiot.
>You certainly are.
>
>>>I suggest you get your facts right, look back at how your remark came
>>>out (you objected to being called an idiot, for which I actually
>>>apologized). Perhaps in retrospect I should not have.
>>>
>>>I think that an apology from you at the very least is forthcoming,
>>>otherwise you are just demonstrating to one and all that you are
>>>hardly worthy to be a member of the human race.
>>>
So now it seems that Mr. Dan Parker finds himself unable to find any
kind of insult or indeed any kind of reference from myself about his
family.
It is amazing how when caught out in a mistake, Mr. Parker simply runs
away.
He is totally unable to type words to the effect of "I am sorry, I was
wrong."
Either that, or he is simply (amongst other things) a liar, was aware
of the fact that he was lying and therefore cannot apologize.
The word "hypocrite" is the one that most readily springs to mind when
thinking about "Dan Parker."
Brian Blank
(remove the spamblocker to reply)
Yale F. Edeiken
> Jeffrey G. Brown wrote in message ...
> >In article <GJfd2.1249$LA1...@news6.ispnews.com>, "Dan Parker, Admitted
> >Liar" <dpa...@intrstar.net> wrote:
> >>>>In my way of thinking, as I am not particularly skilled at deception...
> >>>That's for damn sure, Danny, since if you were skilled at deception, you
> >>>would not have admitted to lying.
> >>Brown, you are a liar. I never admitted to lying anywhere, anytime. I have
> >Absolutely false.
Then, perhaps, you will deal with your various misstatements about
Kristallnacht:
Jeffrey G. Brown
>NBC,
>CBS, MSNBC, CNN, ESPN, Hollywood
Washington Post - owned by Buffet
Times - public company
CNN - Founded by Turner, merged with Times - a public company
ABC - Capitol Cities - a public company
NBC - Public company
CBS - public companies
MSNBC - Microsoft/NBC - both public companies.
More big lies from small minds. These companies have millions of shareholders
and GE/Microsoft are certainly not owned or run by "the Jews" (TM) whoever the
fuck that is.
>Then, ask yourself, why are the Jews suing these companies that saved so many
>Jews during the so-called Auschwitz Event?
The answer is simple - "the Jews" are not suing anybody. Certain Jews are
however. The difference is simple - but complex for those of little
intelligence. Whenever one Jew does something, nazi parasites asert that all
Jews have done it. When a white christian like Hitler or Stalin does something,
simply let them off the hook or blame and scapegoat. More lies and denying from
nazi cockroaches.
Dan Parker
Dan Parker
* * *
Dan Parker wrote in message <17129819...@rhyssa.net>...
Dan Parker
Dan Parker
* * *
Dan Parker wrote in message <17129817...@plerotic.com>...