Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Jewish conquest of the Slavs (Jewish Bolshevism) Prytulak Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine -25May98 REPOST..

1 view
Skip to first unread message

<Doc Tavish>

unread,
Mar 30, 2001, 6:05:35 AM3/30/01
to
--
LESSONS IN HISTORY -- MORE PROOF BOLSHEVISM WAS JEWISH!

http://www.ukar.org/shapov01.shtml
(Link active February 10, 2001)

EXCERPTED

<FAIR USE INTENDED -- NON-PROFIT>

Terms of a truce: Were I authorized to represent the Ukrainian position in
negotiating with Jews a cessation of verbal hostilities, I might open with
"If you stop fabricating lies about us, we will stop disclosing the truth
about you."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prytulak Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine 25May98 Jewish conquest of the
Slavs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Shapoval volume, then, provides us with one such reason why some
Ukrainian anti-Semitism might exist. The reason is that Ukrainians have
been aware of the Jewish domination of the experiment in government
through mass murder which went under the name of "Communism," and in which
experiment Ukrainians more than any other peoples have been conscripted
into playing the role of guinea pigs.

Jewish Conquest of the Slavs

The Shapoval volume. The analyses that I present below are based on
information in the following book written in Ukrainian, with some of its
documentation presented in Russian:

Yuri Shapoval, Volodymyr Prystaiko, and Vadym Zolotariov, Cheka-GPU-NKVD
in Ukraine: People, Facts, Documents, Abris, Kyiv, 1997.

For the sake of brevity, I will refer to the above book as "the Shapoval
volume."

Sponsorship. It is possibly highly significant that this book was
sponsored by the following:

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
M. S. Hrushevsky Institute
of Ukrainian Archaeography and Fontology
Security Service of Ukraine

----------------------------

Nationalities in the Cheka-GPU-NKVD. One may summarize my chief finding
with this succinct approximation:

Out of every 10 senior members
of the Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine:
6 were Jewish,
2 were Russian,
1 was Ukrainian, and
1 was other.

Latvians. Latvians led in the "other" category. More specifically:
NATIONALITY NUMBER INVOLVED PERCENTAGE
Jewish=92 + Father Jewish=1 93 58.1
Russian 34 21.3
Ukrainian 15 9.4
Latvian (M)=6 + (F)=1 7 4.4
Belarusian 3 1.9
Polish 2 1.3
Polish/German 1 .6
Armenian 1 .6
Georgian 1 .6
German 1 .6
Lithuanian 1 .6
Moldovan 1 .6

Total known nationality 160 100
Unknown nationality 23
Total 183

Almost no mixed parentage. Given that the authors noted the instance in
which only the father was Jewish, it would appear that there are no other
instances of known mixed parentage in this sample.

Almost no females. In Ukrainian, the word for "a Latvian person" comes in
masculine and feminine versions, and thus it was possible to note upon no
more than seeing their nationality stated that six of the Latvians were
male and one female. But as all the other nationality names also come in
two versions, then it would also have been possible to note the presence
of a female in them as well, which however I failed to do. Thus, in the
sample of 160 for which nationalities were specified, there appears to be
only a single female. The Cheka-GPU-NKVD in Ukraine, then, appears to
have been a male-dominated occupation.

Possible under-estimate of Jewish participation. The "Polish/German"
above refers to a single official who was inconsistent in identifying his
nationality on various documents, sometimes stating Polish and sometimes
German. Two possibilities come to mind: first, that neither of these is
his true nationality; second, that other officials may have misrepresented
their nationality more consistently and thus avoided detection. More
specifically, as Jews commonly assumed non-Jewish names and concealed
their Jewish identity, it is possible that the above statistics constitute
an under-estimate of Jewish presence in the Cheka-GPU-NKVD.

The Shapoval volume offers some evidence in confirmation of this
hypothesis. That is, in listing the names of the 183 Cheka-GPU-NKVD
officials, when the official used more than one name or changed his name,
Shapoval included the aliases in parentheses. The number of names
containing parentheses was 20. Of these, 14 were Jewish, 3 Latvian, 1
Russian, 1 German, and 1 unknown. Thus, it would appear that the changing
of names was overwhelmingly a Jewish phenomenon. Furthermore, my
impression is that the name changes tended to be in the direction of
making the names less Jewish and more Slavic, though as this conclusion
requires the exercise of judgment, and as in several cases I did not trust
my judgment, I do not here quantify the direction of the name changes.
Four examples of names that seemed to go from Jewish to Slavic were:

EARLIER JEWISH NAME LATER SLAVIC NAME
Holovanivskyi Bernard Volfovych Kozelskyi Borys Volodymyrovych
Podolsky Davyd Vulfovych Orlov Danylo Volodymyrovych
Izrail Moiseiovych Radzivilovskyi Oleksandr Pavlovych
Rosenbardt Abram Borysovych Rozanov Oleksandr Borysovych

Declining to guess nationality from name? Among the 23 for whom
nationality was not specified, I noticed a few cases in which nationality
might be inferred from the name alone. For example, although no
nationality was specified for Solomon Isaakovych Goldman, one might
venture to guess that he is more likely Jewish than Russian or Ukrainian.
I conclude that either the authors had independent evidence concerning
Goldman's nationality but failed to specify it as an oversight, or else
that they had insufficient biographical data to infer nationality, and
followed the general rule of declining to do so from name only. Of course
if the Shapoval authors declined to guess that Solomon Isaakovych Goldman
was Jewish, then I decline to do so as well, leaving him uncategorized
with respect to nationality.

[...]

A minor paradox resolved. It should go without saying that even if the
Communist Revolution was controlled mostly by Jews, it does not follow
that most Jews were either Communists or revolutionaries. Rather, many
writers go out of their way to comment that only a minority of Jews
supported Bolshevism, most were indifferent, and some opposed it. Thus,
although in the first of the pair of quotations below, we see Hilaire
Belloc unequivocally placing responsibility for the Russian Revolution at
the feet of the Jews, yet in the second of the pair of quotations we find
him unequivocally exonerating Jews in general from blame — a seeming
paradox which a little thought demonstrates contains no contradiction:

It was the pure despotism of a clique, the leaders of which had been
specially launched upon Russia under German direction in order to break
down any chance of a revival of Russian military power, and all those
leaders, without exception, were Jews, or held by the Jews through their
domestic relations, and all that followed was done directly under the
orders of Jews, the most prominent of whom was one Braunstein, who
disguised himself under the assumed name of Trotsky. A terror was set up,
under which were massacred innumerable Russians of the governing classes,
so that the whole framework of the Russian State disappeared. Among
these, of course, must specially be noted great numbers of the clergy,
against whom the Jewish revolutionaries had a particular grudge. A clean
sweep was made of all the old social organization, and under the despotism
of this Jewish clique the old economic order was reversed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1937, p. 58)

For the Bolshevist movement, or rather explosion, was Jewish.

That truth may be so easily confused with a falsehood that I must, at the
outset, make it exact and clear.

The Bolshevist Movement was a Jewish movement, but not a movement of the
Jewish race as a whole. Most Jews were quite extraneous to it; very many
indeed, and those of the most typical, abhor it; many actively combat it.
The imputation of its evils to the Jews as a whole is a grave injustice
and proceeds from a confusion of thought whereof I, at any rate, am free.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, 1937, p. 55)

Jews present obstacle to the rule of law in Ukraine. One of Ukraine's
most pressing needs today is to demonstrate the rule of law by punishing
the most egregious violations of the law — namely torture, murder,
genocide. To the degree that the number of the guilty and the weakness of
the law make this unfeasible, Ukraine then needs more than anything else
to at least implement a Truth and Reconciliation Commission paralleling
the Truth and Reconciliation Commission so wisely instituted in South
Africa. However, there is one huge obstacle standing in the way either of
the punishment of the guilty or of inducing them to confess. That
obstacle is that a disproportionate number of the accused, or of those
revealed to have committed crimes, might turn out to be Jews, with the
result that Ukraine would be portrayed by a mindless world press as having
gone on an anti-Semitic rampage. Thus, one way that Jews continue to harm
Ukraine today is by standing in the way of Ukraine demonstrating the power
of its law to bring its torturers and its butchers to account, or the
power of its righteousness to command its torturers and its butchers to at
least confess....

.... The Shapoval volume provides us with one such reason why some
Ukrainian anti-Semitism might exist. The reason is that Ukrainians have
been aware of the Jewish domination of the experiment in government
through mass murder which went under the name of "Communism," and in which
experiment Ukrainians more than any other peoples have been conscripted
into playing the role of guinea pigs.

Terms of a truce. Were I authorized to represent the Ukrainian position
in negotiating with Jews a cessation of verbal hostilities, I might open
with "If you stop fabricating lies about us, we will stop disclosing the
truth about you."

<END>

Need I say anything?
Doc Tavish

---
>I ask-- why do we never see Jews criticize the communism
>which existed before Stalin took control?

"Because there was very little to criticize."
Susan Cohen - January 24, 2001

--digsig
Authentic Doc Tavish
Chyeer+xvAMg6mRtq2niuMN+bMnEkGsy0ShVPm2xATn
hLVaNOrlZMYincbX1Cvw9UKL1scB/QZxgpjhGkUc
4uSo+7l2V9m7r0D2C6sG37BZqG2uYTVYS9c/adWTy

0 new messages