Updated Nazihunter Page on Yoderanium
NAZIHUNTER
Orac
MAR...@NETCOM.COM (NAZIHUNTER) wrote:
>http://members.yoderanium.com/nazihunter
>
Odd how at the very bottom of the page there is a very revealing line,
which I now cut and paste here for your edification:
copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
LOL! Scotty must not have read the contract very closely or checked out
the webpage after he made it.
--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"
Patrick L. Humphrey
>In article <j4Na6.139695$f36.5...@news20.bellglobal.com>,
>MAR...@NETCOM.COM (NAZIHUNTER) wrote:
>>http://members.yoderanium.com/nazihunter
>Odd how at the very bottom of the page there is a very revealing line,
>which I now cut and paste here for your edification:
>copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
>LOL! Scotty must not have read the contract very closely or checked out
>the webpage after he made it.
You have to remember: he doesn't need to proofread his HTML coding, since
he has SoOpEr SeKrIt PoWeRz...
--PLH, so secret, that no one else has ever seen them
Hilary Ostrov
<Orac-2E9842.2...@news.earthlink.net>, Orac
<Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>In article <j4Na6.139695$f36.5...@news20.bellglobal.com>,
>MAR...@NETCOM.COM (NAZIHUNTER) wrote:
>
>>http://members.yoderanium.com/nazihunter
>>
>
>Odd how at the very bottom of the page there is a very revealing line,
>which I now cut and paste here for your edification:
>
>copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
>
>LOL! Scotty must not have read the contract very closely or checked out
>the webpage after he made it.
Not very clever, is he?! Of course this would certainly go a long way
towards providing the explanation Bradbury never could as to how
"nazihunter" managed to accomplish the remarkable feat of (according
to Bradbury) "countering" Bradbury's "public announcement" post a full
hour and forty minutes *before* Bradbury actually made his
"announcement".
http://x69.deja.com/=dnc/getdoc.xp?AN=685522841
hro
=====================
Hilary Ostrov
E-mail: hos...@telus.net
WWW: http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/
The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Doktor Tavische
>On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 01:11:42 GMT, in
><Orac-2E9842.2...@news.earthlink.net>, Orac
><Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <j4Na6.139695$f36.5...@news20.bellglobal.com>,
>>MAR...@NETCOM.COM (NAZIHUNTER) wrote:
>>
>>>http://members.yoderanium.com/nazihunter
The above web page should be activated too within 24 hours.
>>Odd how at the very bottom of the page there is a very revealing line,
>>which I now cut and paste here for your edification:
>>
>>copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
>>
>>LOL! Scotty must not have read the contract very closely or checked out
>>the webpage after he made it.
You are really a dunce! I did not make a web page to harass myself. Your
pal Nazihunter has making web pages all over the place and they all say
the same thing! I just got this from a web page provider in reply to a
complaint I made. Hardly seems like I would be creating web pages and then
asking the same providers to can them does it BUT in your ignorant
reasoning mind rational thought has no room!
<START>
Received: from vmd-ext.prodigy.net (vmd-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.89])
by ogopogo.flash.net (8.9.3/Pro-8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA02620
for <xxx...@flash.net>; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:49:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lfcity.townsqr.com (mail.lfcity.com [207.18.224.150])
by vmd-ext.prodigy.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0N0kUm252244
for <xxx...@flash.net>; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 19:46:30 -0500
Received: from ww1 (unverified [63.160.71.103]) by lfcity.townsqr.com
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 3.4.5) with SMTP id <B0000...@lfcity.townsqr.com>
for <xxx...@flash.net>;
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:38:54 -0600
Message-ID: <B0000...@lfcity.townsqr.com>
From: "Webconsultants" <webcons...@mail2.webspawner.com>
To: "Scott Bradbury" <xxx...@flash.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:48:48 -0500
Reply-To: "Webconsultants" <webcons...@mail2.webspawner.com>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222)
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.2001011...@pop.flash.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Your FREE WEBPAGE Service is STILL Being Used to Make
Criminal Death Threats Against Me!
X-UIDL: 9c583e393f7bbaf21d8414d7b606cee5
The webpage has been terminated..
Thank you.
Regards,
Edith
WebSpawner Staff.
>To whom it may concern,
> This is the second time I have complained and the criminal web page is
>still active! I did not make the page and it is meant to harass and incite
>violence against me.
>
>Here is the offending web page and its contents:
>
>http://www.webspawner.com/users/tavishhunter/
>
>WELCOME TO NAZIHUNTER'S PAGE
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>WELCOME TO THE NAZI-SCUMBAG PAGE
>
>HERE WE WILL PROVIDE AS MUCH INFORMATION AS POSSIBLE ABOUT THE VARIOUS
>NET-NAZIS WHO INHABIT ALT.REVISIONISM.
>
>AMONG THEM:
>
>SCOTT BRADBURY, AKA DOC TAVISH
>DAVID E. MICHAEL, AKA "DR." DAVID MICHAEL
>DON ELLIS, AKA TOO MANY SOCK-PUPPETS TO LIST.
>
>SUCH NAZI PIGS AS MATT GIWER, SABATINI, LIPPAI, BARON, ETC. HAVE BEEN
>NEUTRALIZED AND ARE THEREFORE NOT WORTHY OF ANY MORE ATTENTION.HERE'S A
>TASTE:
(Don Ellis' address deleted)
<deleted now 01/22/2001 for this specific post>
>AND NOW FOR THE MORBIDLY OBESE SCOTTIE:
>
>WHY NOT VISIT HIM?
>WITH A BASEBALL BAT
>
<telephone number deleted now 01/22/2001 for this specific post>
>
>Scott Bradbury
<address deleted now 01/22/2001 for this specific post>
>From: the HOLOCAUST MUSEUM100 Raoul WallenbergPlace, Washington, DC 20024
>Map To <address deleted now 01/22/2001 for this specific post>
>copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WebSpawner Page Machine
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Send E-Mail to: KAS...@hotmail.com
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This page created using the webpage creation facilities of Webspawner.
>Copyright 2000 scott bradbury. All Rights Reserved
>
><END>
>Once again I did not create the page above and I expect to see it
>deactivated within 36 hours! This is the last time I intend to make a request!
>
> Scott Bradbury
<STOP>
>Not very clever, is he?! Of course this would certainly go a long way
>towards providing the explanation Bradbury never could as to how
>"nazihunter" managed to accomplish the remarkable feat of (according
>to Bradbury) "countering" Bradbury's "public announcement" post a full
>hour and forty minutes *before* Bradbury actually made his
>"announcement".
>
>http://x69.deja.com/=dnc/getdoc.xp?AN=685522841
John Morris also exposed your idiot logic too Inquisitor in what follows.
My but you're one stupid woman! You need to increase your Estrogen because
you are starting to become irrational.
You do remember what John Morris told you about your idiotic logic and
reasoning don't you?
LOOK and be ashamed of your idiocy!
http://x58.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=657417008
Subject: Re: Hey, Scottie, I hear ya . . .
Date: 08/12/2000
Author: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
In <djm7ps40b69ldg3p4...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism, on
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 19:51:17 -0700, Hilary Ostrov
<hos...@uniserve.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 11 Aug 2000 08:25:31 GMT, in
><p6d7psk3culvvngev...@4ax.com>, John Morris
><John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
>>In <3bc7pskmt485ie82t...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism,
>>on Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:55:58 -0700, Hilary Ostrov
>><hos...@uniserve.com> wrote:
>>>On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:20:08 -0400, in
>>><FdLk5.47984$qS3....@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>, "NAZIHUNTER"
>>><MAR...@NETCOM.CA> wrote:
>>>>John Morris wrote in message ...
>>>[...]
>>>>>If it weren't for you providing the pretext, Sara Salzman would
>>>>>not be fearful for her children today.
>>>>>You think you are safe behind a "firewall of anonymity." You
>>>>>are in for a big surprise.
>>>>WANNA BET?
>>>I'm not a betting woman...
Here is the original version:
http://x58.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=657075159
I'm not a betting woman. But I have found the timing and target(s) of
your posts pretty damn suspect. I know that John Morris - and perhaps
others - are convinced that you are the nazi-hunter/finder persona.
My e-mail address is no secret. PROVE to me that you are who TGIJM is
convinced you are by e-mailing me (without disclosing your *real* identity
because I've never known it and could never confirm it, anyway) the
date(s) and amount(s) of your alleged donation(s) to Nizkor.
If you will not do this - or if your answer is incorrect - then you will
have confirmed that you are nothing more than a figment (albeit perhaps a
cyber-copy-cat) of a collective "revisionist" imagination.
And, yes, John, if I do hear from this persona, I shall indicate on the ng
whether or not this individual provides me with any *probative* (if not
conclusive) evidence that marduk98-00=marduk96. And if/when s/he does
provide such evidence, I shall apologize for doubting your superior
intuitive and/or detective skills.
Posted/e-mailed to "Nazihunter" <mar...@netcom.ca>
hro
=====================
Hilary Ostrov
E-mail: hos...@uniserve.com
WWW: http://users.uniserve.com/~hostrov/
The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
(Click this link <http://x58.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=657387902>
to see what sort of response Hilary's e-mail got her!)
>>Of course, it would never occur to you that, if he were the real
>>Nazihunter, it would be in his interest for good people like you
>>to believe that the Nazis are harassing themselves while he goes on
>>harassing them without opposition from good people like you.
>John, I have never considered myself to be any better - or any worse
>- a person than you are. So why should the interest of the "real"
>nazihunter be more likely to lie in behaving in a way that would be
>more consistent with my expectations than yours?
Let me put it this way: for just plain goodness, it's been my
experience with some retarded people are overflowing with goodness.
>When the first of these address postings appeared (Sabatini's, May
>98), I did voice my opposition. And I had my doubts about the
>source of that posting. Doubts which I made no bones about voicing
>privately to a small group - amongst whom you were included. But
>perhaps you have forgotten that. That post - and particularly those that have
>appeared subsequently - could have been from anyone, could they not?
It could have been. And I'm going to cut this short right here.
I've been overwhelmed by your reasoning and your mastery of the
evidence, and I am now 100% convinced that the so-called Nazi is just a
Nazi sockpuppet.
But you have to hand it to them. It was a cunning plan to harass
themselves for four years so that they would have a pretext to go after
Sara. But you found them out. Kudos.
- --
John Morris
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
Here's one more where John does give Hilary a nice sound rebuke!
http://x58.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=657082182
Subject: Re: Hey, Scottie, I hear ya . . .
Date: 08/11/2000
Author: John Morris <John....@UAlberta.CA>
In <3bc7pskmt485ie82t...@4ax.com> in alt.revisionism, on
Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:55:58 -0700, Hilary Ostrov
<hos...@uniserve.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Aug 2000 12:20:08 -0400, in
><FdLk5.47984$qS3....@tor-nn1.netcom.ca>, "NAZIHUNTER"
><MAR...@NETCOM.CA> wrote:
>>John Morris wrote in message ...
>[...]
>>>If it weren't for you providing the pretext, Sara Salzman would
>>>not be fearful for her children today.
>>>You think you are safe behind a "firewall of anonymity." You are
>>>in for a big surprise.
>>WANNA BET?
>I'm not a betting woman. But I have found the timing and target(s)
>of your posts pretty damn suspect. I know that John Morris - and
>perhaps others - are convinced that you are the nazi-hunter/finder
>persona.
>My e-mail address is no secret. PROVE to me that you are who TGIJM
>is convinced you are by e-mailing me (without disclosing your *real*
>identity because I've never known it and could never confirm it,
>anyway) the date(s) and amount(s) of your alleged donation(s) to
>Nizkor.
>If you will not do this - or if your answer is incorrect - then you
>will have confirmed that you are nothing more than a figment (albeit
>perhaps a cyber-copy-cat) of a collective "revisionist" imagination.
Of course, it would never occur to you that, if he were the real
Nazihunter, it would be in his interest for good people like you to
believe that the Nazis are harassing themselves while he goes on harassing
them without opposition from good people like you. In fact, it would be
very helpful to him if you were join in abusing his victims on the grounds
that they were lying about being harassed.
BTW, have you heard the expression "absence of proof is not proof of
absence"? You should stitch it into a sampler and hang it over your
computer, because the logic of your request is precisely "the absence of
proof *is* proof of absence." Logically, you might just as well argue
that the absence of large quantities of human remains is proof of the
absence of the Holocaust. Logically, mind: I'm not saying that is what
you actually arguing. It's simply the same logic.
- --
John Morris
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
I have to add this too! This all of course is for the archives!
http://x53.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=647175128
Subject: Re: The Bradbury is Nazihunter Smear (Re: For The Record -
Bradbury is Protesting Too Much)
Date: 07/17/2000
Author: John Morris <john....@ualberta.ca>
Hilary Ostrov <hos...@uniserve.com> called her next witness before the
Inquisition:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000 22:04:34 GMT, in
> <7langi...@localhost.localdomain>, John Morris
> <john....@ualberta.ca> wrote:
> >Hilary Ostrov <hos...@uniserve.com> writes:
> >> On Sat, 15 Jul 2000 07:43:22 GMT, in
> >> <3h50ns4u1s5p7k678...@4ax.com>, John Morris
> >> <John....@UAlberta.CA> wrote:
> >[snip]
> >> >But more importantly, there is a complicating factor against
> >> >Hilary's evidence. The NNTP-Posting-Host: on the Nazihunter
> >> >message traces to cable modem account in Toronto. While there is
> >> >nothing to say that Bradbury could not open an account with a
> >> >Toronto ISP and obtain telnet access to it, it would take a mighty
> >> >long cable to access a cable server in Toronto.
> >> I quite agree. But is there anything to say that Bradbury couldn't
> >> have a friend (or "associate" as he likes to call the nh/nf persona)
> >> in Toronto to whom he might have given his new unlisted phone
> >> number?
> >You mean like maybe the confession was coerced and the corroborating
> >photograph is a fake?
> No, I don't actually. If you had read my post instead of snipping all
> but one paragraph, you would realize that I had noted a number of
> factual discrepancies, inconsistencies (which I had documented) and
> unanswered questions.
Please allow me to go through these one at a time Inquisitor Ostrov.
You asked me to speculate on how "someone who was not a friend" obtained
an unlisted number. If I can't explain that, then obviously Bradbury
arranged to have his own unlisted number posted.
Your "proof" that this is suspicious is that you were "frankly skeptical"
that Nazihunter would have joined an IRC chat room and then have been able
to post a map to Bradbury's house "within a few short hours." It seems to
me that any "hours" would be far more time than was necessary to read a
road atlas and describe the route from Washington to Bellville, Texas.
In addition, you felt it was "funny" that Bradbury had not never hit on
the idea of forge-cancelling Nazihunter's articles before now.
Then you asked me how the forge-cancels prove "that the original postings
were made by someone who had not *legitimately* acquired his "brand new
just received" unlisted phone number from Bradbury himself?" Of course, I
don't say that they do. I only say that the show the independent
existence of someone in Toronto calling himself Nazihunter.
Then we go on to equivalent of the myth of the efficient German.
Nazihunter would be stupid to risk changing from anonymous accounts back
to identifiable accounts. But he has been operating quite freely for four
years without being caught and stopped and for most of that time from
identifiable accounts.
Then of course there's the fact that Scott's inadvertent post under a
Nazihunter userid does not rule out the possibility of collusion with the
conjectured "Toronto accomplice." But *all* of Scott's posts are being
cancelled by an entity whose existence you haven't proved but conjectured
to fill a glaring gap in your own evidence.
Next in your chain of evidence is Bradbury's inability to explain how his
announcement of a new phone number could have been anticipated by
Nazihunter. By the same token, I can't explain how the sun apparently
violates the laws of thermodynamics by having a corona hotter than its
surface, yet plainly it does have a hotter corona. You merely assume that
Scott is capable of explaining anomalies because he is the source of the
anomalies.
The we come to the "Toronto accomplice" conjecture itself which you will
no doubt disown on the grounds that question wasn't really a rhetorical
question. But then, what happens to your theory when it has come to
*depend* on the conjectured accomplice.
And lastly, Officer Hubert did not return my calls. That's true. He
didn't. But when I first called the Bellville police, I didn't know the
name of the investigating officer. They were only able to tell that it
was Hubert when I identified the case and they looked up the complaint.
At the very lest, there is a complaint on file. (Thanks for verifying that
I have filed a complaint BUT I, in fact, have filed multiple complaints.
Doc Tavish comment 01/22/2001) So I don't know whether Hubert didn't
return my calls because he thinks Bradbury is a nut or whether he didn't
return my calls because Nazihunter he had already been advised by the FBI
that Nazihunter couldn't be extradited from Canada for what in law is a
misdemeanour offence. (Doc Tavish comment January 22, 2001: Officer Hubert
does not think I am a nut. He didn't respond to you because he prefers
working with the feds. Strange you have to smear a victim at the same time
you're defending him!)
And that last point is a fact, too. Under the Canada Criminal Code, the
harassing telephone calls in themselves are punishable on summary
conviction. That is the equivalent of a misdemeanour in the United States
and it is simply the case that under Canada-US extradition treaty
Nazihunter can't be extradited to face trial in the United States.
(Doc Tavish comment January 22, 2001: There is a marked difference between
plain harassment telephone calls and actual death threats! Nazihunter has
made death threat calls and I have posted one example and the police have
the other example which I didn't think to make a copy of at the time
figuring they would have him cornered within a month.)
Nazihunter has been skating a very fine line between misdemeanour
harassment and criminal threats, a finer line than a lunkhead like
Bradbury is capable of skating. You might want to consider that when
speculating upon why Nazihunter has emerged from anonymous remailers: so
long as his victims are in the United States, he's untouchable.
> Not the least of which was the reasonableness
> of the assumptions that have been made regarding the acquisition, use
> and posting of a "brand new unlisted phone number" by an individual
> who is supposedly not a friend of the "victim". In light of this, I
> considered it to be a not unreasonable question. Your mileage
> apparently varied.
Apparently it did.
> But I must congratulate you on the adulation you are currently
> receiving from Bradbury. I suppose it is a much more comfortable
> perch than finding yourself at the end of his blackmail barrel - when
> you couldn't find the post to substantiate what we both knew to be the
> historical truth, i.e. that he had, in fact, reposted Yale's
> relatives' addresses.
Now the smears start. The innuendo is that I'm not really interested in
putting a stop to Nazihunter as I am in placating Bradbury.
> And now that you are his hero
And of course, now I'm a hero to a racist. How long before you label me
an ally of racists, Inquisitor? Perhaps I'm more than an ally, eh,
Inquisitor?
> for "helping identify" this persona,
> perhaps he will even retract his parenthetical claim of July 4 - when
> he was waving his blackmail-striped flag. It was one of his patented
> lengthy ... er ... compilations:
> From: doc_t...@NOSPAMmy-deja.com (Doc Tavish)
> Subject: I Demand A Public Apology from John Morris for Lies and
> Defamation! You Have Five Days!
> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2000 21:23:44 GMT
> Organization: McTavish Informational Services (Non-Profit)
> Message-ID: <39624c60....@news.newsguy.com>
> <quote>
> [an excerpt -hro]
> >Now we have John Morris admitting that Nazihunter has committed
> >crimes such as "harassing telephone calls."
> What admitting? I'm merely taking you and several of his other
> victims at your word. Didn't you say publicly he had telephoned you?
> [here Bradbury had inserted your response to him re the Dec. 15 cotse
> *address* posting; then he continued:]
> John you said this about Nazihunter's threatening telephone call in
> your words above:
> [...hro]
> 3) ... if you lay a criminal charge, I will give a responsible police
> authority evidence which may help identify your attacker. Please
> advise the FBI...
> (For the record I don't need help in identifying this felonious
> criminal--I know who he is and I have all of his spew on tape too!)
> </quote>
> 10 days ago, I thought this was rather ungracious of him, considering
> your earlier efforts to contact the detective who supposedly was
> already in possession of a complaint from Bradbury regarding the
> earlier alleged incident(s). But I suppose it served his smokescreen
> purposes of the hour. Today, I find it outrageously inconsistent with
> his current claims.
But somehow making these contradictions explicit seems unnecessary.
> Oh, well ... what's another glaring inconsistency in the
> Bradbury/Nazihunter saga. In your mind, it seems they will always be
> trumped by one little post to alt.test in which someone posting as "A"
> - via an ISP "A" was known to have used two years earlier - called
> himself "B". And, of course, whatever "B"'s alleged victims have
> claimed.
Actually, no. We're talking about a userid that was used on several
occassions to post home phone numbers and addresses and that was used to
announce on at least two occasions that people had been harassed by
telephone. That userid was in current use when the alt.test posts were
made to set up the Nazihunter persona from the same ISP. That same userid
was used to send me an e-mail asking me not to criticize his harassment of
Matt Giwer because he was a good guy who gave money to good causes.
Finally, subsequent harassing posts came from the same ISP and always from
Toronto or Barrie.
Rather clever of your "Toronto accomplice" to set himself up four years
before he was needed.
> [follow-ups set]
> P.S. In another thread, Bradbury claims to have addressed the one
> hour and 40 minutes "back to the future" discrepancy I identified on
> Jul. 6, "five times". I have not been able to find one such response
> from him.
Well, if the witness refuses to speak, that must be proof of his guilt.
Since it is proof of his guilt, we can discount whether he is ignorant of
the fact that you can change the timestamp on a post by resetting your PC
clock.
> Since I found the post you couldn't find re the names reposting, if
> you recall seeing one of his responses to this, maybe you could
> return the favour. Thanks.
Perhaps I was not clear, Inquisitor. I couldn't find it on my hard drive
only. I didn't check deja.com.
- --
John Morris
~~End of DejaCom Archive~~
Now for some facts concerning the above post:
I have been accused of making the original post which was made posting
Yale F. Edeiken's relatives names, addresses, and telephone numbers BUT
the facts plainly show I am innocent 100%. Just as John said above about
cable modems and subscribers with these words: "While there is nothing to
say that Bradbury could not open an account with a Toronto ISP and obtain
telnet access to it, it would take a mighty long cable to access a cable
server in Toronto."
Hey John I would have had to have a long cable modem hookup to Cincinnati,
Ohio to have made the original posting of Yale's relatives names etc.
Yes folks this is the post which resulted in me getting an obscene
telephone call from Yale and harassment and false accusations made against
me by all of Yale's friends!
LOOK!
<I deleted the DejaCom URL for this posting>
From: Jeffrey G Brown <jeffreygbr...@hotmail.com.invalid>
Subject: Give Yale Edeiken's relatives a call.
Date: 01 Jul 2000 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <146d0240...@usw-ex0102-014.remarq.com>
Bytes: 609
X-Originating-Host: 24.27.186.114
X-Complaints-To: wren...@remarq.com
X-Trace: WReNphoon4 962515052 10.0.2.14 (Sat, 01 Jul 2000 22:17:32 PDT)
Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start
Here
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2000 22:17:32 PDT
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
X-Wren-Trace:
eD8aMjMqbSdsdS4xPG07LyouPTUtNV8hNSc9PT8naHw/ND9sZTF4Zn1vY2x/Ln18
<All names, addresses, and telephone numbers deleted for they are not
relevant>
-----------------------------------------------------------
Got questions? Get answers over the phone at Keen.com.
Up to 100 minutes free!
http://www.keen.com
~~End of CLEANED DejaCom Archive~~
Notice in the headers above the field:
"X-Originating-Host: 24.27.186.114"
What does the origin show when rendered using a WHO IS server?
I used this WHO IS agent <http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi>
and it rendered "24.27.186.114" as:
ServiceCo LLC - Road Runner (NET-ROAD-RUNNER-1)
13241 Woodland Park Road
Herndon, VA 20171 US
Netname: ROAD-RUNNER-1
Netblock: 24.24.0.0 - 24.31.255.255
Maintainer: SCRR
Coordinator:
ServiceCo LLC (ZS30-ARIN) ab...@rr.com
1-703-345-3416
Domain System inverse mapping provided by:
DNS1.RR.COM 24.30.200.3
DNS2.RR.COM 24.30.201.3
Record last updated on 11-Jul-2000.
Database last updated on 15-Jan-2001 18:30:16 EDT.
<END>
I am sorry to say that I do not have an internet provider based in
Virginia! The above internet provider is also a cable modem type provider
too! I guess Edeiken will next accuse me of having over a 1000 mile cable
from Texas! See how he makes false accusations when he has not
considered the evidence!?
Here is what Road Runner or RR.COM says of their service:
http://www.rr.com/rdrun/
"Road Runner LLC, headquartered in Herndon, VA is the parent company of
Road Runner, the nation's pre-eminent broadband service provider. The Road
Runner service delivers high-speed Internet access and compelling
broadband applications and services to the PC over the Road Runner all
optical broadband IP data network combined with an affiliated cable
operator's local hybrid fiber-coaxial (HFC) infrastructure."
(We don't have digital fiber optic cable in Bellville, Texas and my cable
company is Charter Communications which still uses the old analog cable
without any sort of internet connection-- FACT!)
Here is Road Runner's availability:
http://rrcorp.central.rr.com/hso/avail.asp
I entered my zip code (77418) in the search for areas served and this is
what I got: "Thank you very much for your interest in Road Runner. At this
time we do not have definitive plans to launch Road Runner in your area."
NEWS FLASH! Guess what a DNS search rendered on
"24.27.186.114"? It gives the "dialup's" real name and guess what?
LOOK!
(NOTE: Sam Spade is an internet diagnosis and research tool used to fight
spam and search out the identities of spammers and other miscreants! Sam
Spade is FreeWare and is available at: <http://samspade.org/ssw/>)
nslookup 24.27.186.114
Canonical name: cvg-27-186-114.cinci.rr.com
Addresses: 24.27.186.114
Sam Spade also revealed:
Trying 24.27.186 at ARIN
ServiceCo LLC - Road Runner (NET-ROAD-RUNNER-1)
13241 Woodland Park Road
Herndon, VA 20171 US
Netname: ROAD-RUNNER-1
Netblock: 24.24.0.0 - 24.31.255.255
WHO IS <http://www.geektools.com/cgi-bin/proxy.cgi> showed
"cvg-27-186-114.cinci.rr.com" as:
Registrant:
EXCALIBUR Group, A Time Warner Company (RR6-DOM)
13241 Woodland Park Rd
Herndon, VA 20171 US
Domain Name: RR.COM
Whose posts originate from Cincinnati? Who has a Road Runner account in
Cincinnati? Isn't it ironic that I get blamed for what a person in
Cincinnati did!? The headers are here for all to see and the appropriate
internet tools are available for verification of what I now post!
NOW I ASK- Do I have a very long cable to Cincinnati with which I use to
access a cable modem in that city?
BTW Hilary you are the next cndidate for the kill file. You are not
rational and even those on your side know so. I have better things to do
than to squabble with a person who can't see the light! Hilary is one of
those "damn the facts; I'll believe what I want."
Doc Tavish
>hro
---
"I do not deny that Jews were involved in establishing the Communist
regime... Jews are taught to uphold the downtrodden, and that's how
communism came about." Susan Cohen 01/19/2001
http://x70.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=717872510
Doktor Tavische
>On Tue, 23 Jan 2001 01:11:42 GMT, in
><Orac-2E9842.2...@news.earthlink.net>, Orac
><Or...@wlsfanmail.com> wrote:
>
>>In article <j4Na6.139695$f36.5...@news20.bellglobal.com>,
>>MAR...@NETCOM.COM (NAZIHUNTER) wrote:
>>
>>>http://members.yoderanium.com/nazihunter
The above web page should be activated too within 24 hours.
>>Odd how at the very bottom of the page there is a very revealing line,
>>which I now cut and paste here for your edification:
>>
>>copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
>>
>>LOL! Scotty must not have read the contract very closely or checked out
>>the webpage after he made it.
You are really a dunce! I did not make a web page to harass myself. Your
pal Nazihunter has been making web pages all over the place and they all
<START>
Thank you.
Regards,
Edith
WebSpawner Staff.
(Don Ellis' address deleted)
>copyright @ scott bradbury 2001
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WebSpawner Page Machine
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Send E-Mail to: KAS...@hotmail.com
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This page created using the webpage creation facilities of Webspawner.
>Copyright 2000 scott bradbury. All Rights Reserved
>
><END>
>Once again I did not create the page above and I expect to see it
>deactivated within 36 hours! This is the last time I intend to make a request!
>
> Scott Bradbury
<STOP>
>Not very clever, is he?! Of course this would certainly go a long way
>towards providing the explanation Bradbury never could as to how
>"nazihunter" managed to accomplish the remarkable feat of (according
>to Bradbury) "countering" Bradbury's "public announcement" post a full
>hour and forty minutes *before* Bradbury actually made his
>"announcement".
>
>http://x69.deja.com/=dnc/getdoc.xp?AN=685522841
John Morris also exposed your idiot logic too Inquisitor in what follows.
hro
=====================
Hilary Ostrov
E-mail: hos...@uniserve.com
WWW: http://users.uniserve.com/~hostrov/
The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
(Click this link <http://x58.deja.com/getdoc.xp?AN=657387902>