Dr Data Corruption - his wisdom

[mal...@sprynet.com]

In <317d0400...@news.gte.net> kin...@gte.net (Dr. Data Corruption) writes:
>
><CONTENT EDITED>

>God Bless!! You really know how to smear it on thick!! But you
>better watch out!! The fallout is horrible!! I am receiving TONS of
>hate male from the brainless animal rights groups condemning my
>"methods" of dealing with noisy dogs.... Who nows - their brainless
>chunder might just spill over and onto you!!
>
>Later Daz....
>Dr. Data Corruption

Alright - I have monitored this group for almost two years and I don't think I have yet had anyone piss me off like you just have!

I have seen some truely brainless stunts proposed on this group, and for some trueless brainless reasons. But one of the prime rules of this group is that THE ANIMAL IS NOT AT FAULT, IT IS THE OWNERS FAULT!
You proposed feeding a barking dog broken glass in hamburger and describing it's painful agonizing death with glee. And then you call those of us who objected to your sadistic and cruel "revenge" as "brainless"!

You fall into the same catagory of the pubescent idiots who want to nuke their school because they got themselves expelled; the girl who wants to trash her boyfriends car because he dumped her; the woman who wants to kill the woman whom her husband boinked; - a wannabe pHeAkEr (Dr Data Corruption my ass!) who has a chip on his shoulder (probably an 8088) but very little processing power! Sort of like that douchebag who wanted to hire someone to kill his step mother and broadcast his intent and his name all over the world!

As my friend David would put it - you are completely clueless, and couldn't attract a clue if immersed in clue-musk and put in a field with a thousand clues in mating season!

Do you yet have an idea as to my opinion of you, asshole?

I don't think you have made many friends on this group newbie, perhaps you should go back to 2600 where YoU CaN tYpE LiKe tHis aNd It iS CoOl!

(Dr Data Corruption my ass!)

Would you like to come over for a hamburger? My treat!

I would like to hear your most eloquent "fuck you" response. I would prefer you do it publically, so we all can enjoy your wonderful justification of feeding glass to dogs..come on ..... let us all in on your wisdom ... we brainless ones would really like to know! This is a public challenge to you. Show us you are not a complete jackass who thinks safe sex is trimmed fingernails! Nah, you haven't the balls to respond to this. Facing up to scrutiny by your peers and accepting judgement outside your realm of comprehension is far beyond you. After all, we are "brainless". Your idea of "balls" is a sneak attack to painfully kill an animal who is only doing what is instictive to his species.

If you want to respond to me personally, my netcom account is closed in a couple of days so reply to mal...@sprynet.com I will still post your messages in this forum so we call all share them!

David, Carolyn, Mark, Paul, Paal, Sandra .... we have a real winner with us now!

Have a nice day Doctor

Sincerely

Mike Lamb

[Dr. Data Corruption]

>
>If you want to respond to me personally, my netcom account is closed in a couple of days so reply to mal...@sprynet.com I will still post your messages in this forum so we call all share them!
>
>David, Carolyn, Mark, Paul, Paal, Sandra .... we have a real winner with us now!
>
>Have a nice day Doctor
>
>Sincerely
>
>Mike Lamb

A "F*CK YOU" Would be too nice.... Besides, I could care less of your
opinion of me. A "wannabe"? "Clueless"? Post to you personally?
Naw - I'll keep it right here in the public forum - your not dealing
with some kid that thinks he needs to run home to momma because
someone disagrees with him.

I will continue to post with glee just knowing that what I have to say
is enough to make you boil over. "Try to destroy you somehow"? Why?
I don't need to find some way to end your existence here in this
group. I can just go on hurting you with my words. This will be the
most fun I've had in a long time.

Oh - by the way - your USENET News reader isn't embedding
carriage-returns in the posted return quotes. You might want to fix
that before someone takes you to task over it.....

Oh, by the way, I thought the dog retaliation thing a little extreme
too, but what the h*ll - this area is for REVENGE, isn't it??? You
don't get revenge by being nice, you get it by striking hard the first
time..... All's fair in Love and War....

'Nough Said.
Dr. Data Corruption

[Michael Lamb]

kin...@gte.net (Dr. Data Corruption) wrote:
>
>>
>>If you want to respond to me personally, my netcom account is closed in a couple of days so reply to mal...@sprynet.com I will st=

ill post your messages in this forum so we call all share them!
>>
>>David, Carolyn, Mark, Paul, Paal, Sandra .... we have a real winner with us now!
>>
>>Have a nice day Doctor
>>
>>Sincerely
>>
>>Mike Lamb
>
>A "F*CK YOU" Would be too nice.... Besides, I could care less of your
>opinion of me. A "wannabe"? "Clueless"? Post to you personally?
>Naw - I'll keep it right here in the public forum - your not dealing
>with some kid that thinks he needs to run home to momma because
>someone disagrees with him.

Perhaps not, but I am certainly not dealing with a mature and rational
adult. Related to Charles Manson, perhaps?

>
>I will continue to post with glee just knowing that what I have to say
>is enough to make you boil over.

Don't get the satisfaction, I deal with people every day who would eat you
alive as soon as look at you and they don't make me "boil over".

"Try to destroy you somehow"? Why?
>I don't need to find some way to end your existence here in this
>group.

I don't remember saying anything of the sort. Are you sure you didn't
confuse another flame with mine?

I can just go on hurting you with my words. This will be the
>most fun I've had in a long time.

Have fun - but you aren't going to hurt me. You are just going to make an
ass of yourself.

>
>Oh - by the way - your USENET News reader isn't embedding
>carriage-returns in the posted return quotes. You might want to fix
>that before someone takes you to task over it.....

Quite true, and for that I apologize. I tried a different reader and it
didn't wordwrap. I have switched accounts now and I think this reader is
working correctly. At least I hope so, I will have to check my own reply
to be certain. Again, I apologize for that.

>
>Oh, by the way, I thought the dog retaliation thing a little extreme
>too, but what the h*ll - this area is for REVENGE, isn't it??? You
>don't get revenge by being nice, you get it by striking hard the first
>time..... All's fair in Love and War....
>
>'Nough Said.
>Dr. Data Corruption

If you thought it to be a little extreme, why the hell did you suggest it?
Don't you realize that a vast majority of the posters to this group are
teenagers who don't have the wisdom to differentiate between extreme and
not extreme? For chrissakes - some of these kids want to blow up cars or
kill their stepmothers! The stupid shits get themselves expelled from
school and want revenge! For what? Their own actions? There may well be
some impressionable idiot out there breaking up glass right now and asking
for a raise in his allowance so he can buy a pound of hamburger.

"Striking hard the first time"...."love and war" ....

You are talking to a warrior! Past Army Ranger, sniper, swat officer,
tactical ops, air assault, etc. Yes, you strike hard the first time, "one
shot, one kill" but make sure you have the correct target.

Mike

[Dr. Data Corruption]

<CONTENT DELETED>

>kill their stepmothers! The stupid shits get themselves expelled from
>school and want revenge! For what? Their own actions? There may well be
>some impressionable idiot out there breaking up glass right now and asking
>for a raise in his allowance so he can buy a pound of hamburger.
>
>"Striking hard the first time"...."love and war" ....
>
>You are talking to a warrior! Past Army Ranger, sniper, swat officer,
>tactical ops, air assault, etc. Yes, you strike hard the first time, "one
>shot, one kill" but make sure you have the correct target.
>
>Mike

About the news reader: Go out and get Forte's AGENT 99 (Versions are
available for 311, 95, and NT). It is the best reader that I have
found so far for these news groups. The Alt.Hackers group keeps up
with cracks for it, so when you get it, go visit the group and ask for
the crack..... (www.forteinc.com) (alt.cracks)

As for this area being a bunch of "idiot teens" -> I was 16 once, and
I had enough common sense to know that if I did something stupid and
went down for it - nobody was coming to get me out of the can. Give
these "idiot teens" some credit - they are "young adults", and more
often than not, are smarter than you give them credit for. On that
premise, I give the "young adult" the choice - they do something harsh
like this "dog killin'" in the real world, and they are going to have
to suffer any and all consequences that come out of it. When I post,
I expect that they know that. As for planting the idea - I am
exercising my freedom of speech as granted by the Constitution. If
your law-enforcement, you are fully aware of this.

As for people eating me alive, etc -> you don't know me, my line of
work, or the calibre of people I deal with every day. My hardness was
acquired from the crap I put up with day in and day out. My attitude
came from hard earned experience, and by applying it - I've kept my
ass. In some of the environments I have visited, you showed toughness
first, and people left you alone. Same when they came to test you -
you made a tough example first, and they left you alone. It's playing
with that common sense thing again - people won't mess with something
that they think can hurt them.

As for being a warrior - you might have fired a gun a few times, you
might have even killed, but so far, you have shown softness several
times in this posting - you need to loose that if you want to deal
with people around here with an "In your face" type posture. These
"young adults" WILL flame you alive if you give them so much as half a
chance.....

And another thing, the hacker circles I ran around in twelve years ago
sprouted this attitude that I have. The hackers that I knew had a
code, and as long as you lived inside that code, you enjoyed the FULL
benefits of it; but if you EVER defied it (ie: you ratted on another
hacker, you destroyed another hackers' gear, etc), you went down HARD.
I know - saw a friend thrown from the top of a third story stairwell
because he didn't have sense enough to keep his keyboard out of
someone else's machinery...... Fortunately, he only broke an arm....

Oh, and No - I am no relation to Charley and his bunch..... I agree -
they are a bunch of psychos..... And yes - I am digitally BAD - and I
do have an 8088 on my test bench, not on my shoulder.....

[Richard P. Schmied]

<snipped prior articles>

I have to agree with Mike, Dr. Data you are an asshole.

Anyone that would do something like you suggested would be one sick
motherfucker!

Incidentally, some years ago my neighbor was neglecting his dog. I
considered having a friend steal it. Finally, I simply asked him if I
could have his dog. After he got over the shock of that statement he
said "Sure. I don't have the time anyway"

Turned out to be a damn good dog.

[Mark G. Havener]

In article <31815d40...@news.gte.net>,

kin...@gte.net (Dr. Data Corruption) wrote:

>Oh, by the way, I thought the dog retaliation thing a little extreme
>too, but what the h*ll - this area is for REVENGE, isn't it??? You
>don't get revenge by being nice, you get it by striking hard the first
>time..... All's fair in Love and War....
>

>'Nough Said.
>Dr. Data Corruption

I have refrained from responding because I didn't like your style. I find
you to be as subtle as a sledgehammer.

Yes, this is the area for revenge, however you miss the whole idea. This
is more like Zen Pranksterism. Revenge is an art form of subtlety. The more
subtle you get, the more enjoyment you can have watching the mark squirm on
your pin.

If I just wanted to beat the shit out of somebody because they pissed me
off, I have a real nice PR-24 baton that I can massage their kidneys, head
and various joints with. However nice the immediate gratification, there
would be a downside of the matter by having to be processed thru the legal
system.

But like the lady not too far back that went to a garage sale of her mark
and added a couple of books like "The Joy of Lesbian Sex" to her book
table, that was a masterful touch that had me FOTFLOL! By quietly slipping
a book in, she ruined the reputation of the mark quicker and with more
effect than if she had taken out a full page ad in the local paper.

If I have to explain, you'll never understand.

+-----------------+--------------------------------+
| Mark G. Havener | http://www.netten.net/~havener |
+-----------------+--------------------------------+
"All men are created equal, up to the point of exertion."

[Ruth Rhoid]

In article <ADAA63A9...@b14.netten.net>, 74022...@compuserve.com
(Mark G. Havener) writes:

> But like the lady not too far back that went to a garage sale of her
mark
>and added a couple of books like "The Joy of Lesbian Sex" to her book
>table, that was a masterful touch that had me FOTFLOL! By quietly
slipping
>a book in, she ruined the reputation of the mark quicker and with more
>effect than if she had taken out a full page ad in the local paper.
>
>

I agree, the best target for revenge is the marks brain. A true revenge
leaves your mark in deep, knocking his (or her) head against the wall and
wondering what the hell happend. All this while everyone that looks in
your direction shakes their head and says no, she couldn't have anything
to do with that. She must just have a guardian angle that protects her.
He only got what he diserved.

Ruth (I'm so sweet and nice I make myself sick) Rhoid