In article <t17srm$2s1n4$
5...@news.freedyn.de>
<
governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Bad move FBI.  Really bad move.
>
A few weeks ago, liberals in the media and politics were loudly 
complaining that the Justice Department was being way too 
passive in its investigation of Donald Trump.
Why can’t Merrick Garland be more aggressive, they demanded, and 
put the former president behind bars? In doing so, they echoed 
the tactics they vehemently decried when Trump was president and 
openly pressured two attorneys general to go after his political 
enemies.
Well, that has changed.
Now the liberals are thrilled that a team of FBI agents raided 
Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home. And it is conservatives in the media 
and politics who are outraged that, in a move undoubtedly 
approved by Garland, the bureau took this unprecedented step 
against a former president.
But keep in mind that the FBI had to get a judge to approve a 
search warrant with a detailed list of what is being sought and 
why it is justified by the probe. We haven’t seen that yet, but 
that is how the criminal justice system works.
Still, I think this was a major misstep by Garland, but not for 
the reason you might think. More on that in a moment.
When the story broke on Tuesday night, Donald Trump was the sole 
source of information. Justice doesn’t disclose how it conducts 
criminal probes that are supposed to be secret, although 
department officials knew this would be the mother of all 
bombshells and will have to address it.
When Trump defenders say such a raid has never been aimed at a 
former president, look at the flip side. No former president has 
played at least some role in a riot rooted in the notion – which 
Trump continues to proclaim to this day – that the election was 
"stolen" from him, despite a lack of evidence in all those 
lawsuits and a probe by his own DOJ, led by Bill Barr, which led 
to the AG’s departure.
The major papers quoted a couple of lines from Trump’s Truth 
Social statement, such as "after working and cooperating with 
the relevant Government agencies, this unannounced raid on my 
home was not necessary or appropriate," and that "Such an 
assault could only take place in broken, Third-World Countries."
But they chose not to mention his more inflammatory attacks, 
which are worth examining.
"It is Prosecutorial Misconduct, the Weaponization of the 
Justice System, and an attack by Radical Left Democrats who 
desperately don’t want me to run for President in 2024."
First, rather than a case of prosecutorial misconduct, it was a 
lawful search warrant approved by a judge, which Trump never 
gets around to mentioning. Second, the now-demonized FBI happens 
to be run by Trump’s own appointee, Chris Wray.
"They even broke into my safe!... What is the difference between 
this and Watergate…"
Okay, Watergate was carried out against DNC headquarters in a 
Washington hotel by Cuban burglars who turned out to have been 
hired by Richard Nixon’s reelection committee. This was a duly 
authorized raid by government agents.
There has been a strange role reversal between the parties. For 
decades, the Republicans were the law-and-order party, backing 
cops, prosecutors, sheriffs and G-men, while the Democrats, 
fairly or unfairly, were painted as soft on crime. Now you have 
top Republicans ripping federal law enforcement, with Marjorie 
Taylor Greene calling to "defund the FBI."
And here comes the hypocrisy watch: Everyone would change their 
positions in a heartbeat if this had been a raid on, say, Barack 
Obama’s home, with Democrats denouncing an out-of-control FBI 
and Republicans saying justice was finally being done. In fact, 
we saw this during the FBI probe of Hillary Clinton’s private 
email server, when Democrats attacked Jim Comey and the GOP went 
ballistic about her actions.
But Trump, while providing no evidence that "Radical Left 
Democrats" have taken over Justice, and Biden has doggedly taken 
a hands-off approach – has a point in bringing up Hillary. For 
we know from Trump’s account, and the media quoting DOJ 
"sources," that the bureau ended up seizing multiple boxes and 
documents.
That means the focus of the raid was limited to Trump taking 
documents, especially classified documents, to Florida rather 
than turning them over to the National Archives.
That has the makings of a criminal offense. But others in the 
past have gotten off with a wrist slap. Sandy Berger, Obama’s 
former national security adviser, pleaded guilty to a 
misdemeanor seven years ago for smuggling out classified papers 
from a government archive. Former CIA chief John Deutch had his 
security clearance suspended in 1999 after his agency concluded 
he had improperly handled classified documents on his home 
computer.
And that’s my issue with Garland. This is small ball. It’s 
getting Al Capone on tax evasion. I don’t think it was worth the 
political uproar and the attacks he must have known were 
inevitable. I can’t imagine Garland bringing a case based solely 
on some classified documents. It’s a sideshow.
So what’s he doing? Maybe signaling he’s conducting an 
aggressive probe while in the end declining to bring criminal 
charges against Trump. Unless Garland has an extremely strong 
case involving the former president and the Capitol riot, he 
would have to conclude that it’s not worth filing charges, 
plunging the country into turmoil and convincing his supporters 
that he is indeed a political victim – which would play out as 
Trump declares his candidacy against Garland’s boss.
Then, of course, media liberals and Democrats would be back to 
denouncing Merrick Garland for wimping out against the president 
they have wanted for six years to see indicted and convicted.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/trump-denounces-fbi-court-approved-
mar-lago-raid-garlands-major-mistake