Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Remove Illegal Evidence...............................................Now . 7202

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Simon

unread,
Mar 18, 2001, 5:45:33 AM3/18/01
to
In a violent outburst <hKZs6.12024$KL5.39990@NewsReader>,
pgz...@safe4u.com shouted:

> When you access the Internet, your computer keeps permanent hidden records of
> your activities!
>
> Evidence Eliminator allowed me to see exactly whats on my PC's hard drive.
> Needless to say I was shocked at what I found.
> Files I shredded months earlier were clearly visible using this software.
>
> If you take your computer in for repair, what will they find?
> Think about it !
>
> You really do need.............Evidence Eliminator.
> http://www.evidence-eliminator.com/go.shtml?A653704
> elhmzlxggshigxkklpyibwcdegyrdorzcfnntsksqopfgbrpprqbisowkrznuugouuidzvnphzfngk
> lpqmqgklpelc
>

Stop crossposting, ya fucking fool.
That's the second time I've seen this message in five seconds.
Keep out of Alt.Shenanigans and Alt.Revenge, go back to
news:alt.idiot.aoler.crossposter.fools.

Or swing by news:alt.suicide.methods and try some of the stuff there.

Have a nice day

--
The statement below is true.
The statement above is false.

Simon

unread,
Mar 18, 2001, 12:59:31 PM3/18/01
to
In a violent outburst <MPG.151eba723...@news.alt.net>,
P.Dulles <*@*.com> shouted:

>
> 4. They upgrade it so it will work more effectively with the NTFS file
> system
>
> In the meantime, expect to see a massive xposted promotion at least
> twice a week. Everytime I see a xpost for it, I try to talk at least
> ONE person from purchasing it. My own revenge!
>
> So, for equal time, I will give you three reasons NOT to buy it!
>
> 1. Eliminating 'evidence' (i.e. cookies, registry entries, web history
> and temp files, regular temp files, .bak and other garbage files that
> Windows leaves all over the place and eliminating any chance of
> recovering these files from simple methods of "undelete" to magnetic
> underwriting of the drive (which involves electron microscopy and
> needn't concern 99.9999999999999% of us) is a time-consuming project.
> To do a DOD level disk wipe, which is 7x0 + 7x1 + 7xR (seven passes of
> writi

Yeah, I knew about the marketing and such. I just had to let off some
steam.

BTW, "I promise." :-)

The Revanchist

unread,
Mar 18, 2001, 3:43:06 PM3/18/01
to

"P.Dulles" <*@*.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.151eba723...@news.alt.net...

>
> 1. Eliminating 'evidence' (i.e. cookies, registry entries, web
history
> and temp files, regular temp files, .bak and other garbage files
that
> Windows leaves all over the place and eliminating any chance of
> recovering these files from simple methods of "undelete" to magnetic
> underwriting of the drive (which involves electron microscopy and
> needn't concern 99.9999999999999% of us) is a time-consuming
project.
> To do a DOD level disk wipe, which is 7x0 + 7x1 + 7xR (seven passes
of
> writing a zero, then 7 of writing a 1, then seven of a randomly
> generated character) on a 16Gb drive takes 16 hours, 37 minutes on a
PII
> 450 with 128 Mb RAM. Yes, I timed it on one of my machines. If you
are
> worried that someone will look for something "naughty" on your
machine,
> please ask them for at least a days notice.


If it's really a problem for people, they simply need to have two
portable hard disks. One is inserted for the really fun stuff, and
removed after use. The other is a dummy carrying all the innocent
information - links to disney.com, pictures of the ex in black
stockings and suspenders.

Why make life difficult?


--
The Revanchist
'Revenge is mine' saith the Lord, 'so, let's talk franchising.'
TLC (tinlc)(tm) #2002, a.f.i-c #1
revanchist [at] sternpost [.] de
revanchist [at] mdchoice [.] com
Tel: (+1) 888 460 8081 #214


MadMan

unread,
Mar 18, 2001, 5:19:07 PM3/18/01
to
In article <MPG.151eba723...@news.alt.net>, *@*.com says...
>
[evidence eliminator]
> Even though I own and use the product and have tested it thoroughly,

Har! And just what evidence do you need to eliminate?

0 new messages