Part 77: Barbara Schwarz reveals shocking news!
BarbaraSchwarz
former Scientology attorney Deinlein, in August 1984, that Gauweiler
called me in the Munich Org, telling me that Helmuth Bloebaum and
Juerg Stettler signed something in favor for the
Kreisverwaltungsreferrat without my knowledge.
Fact is: I did not get such phonecall from Gauweiler. I also don't
believe that Helmuth Bloebaum and Juerg Stettler signed anything,
without my knowledge, while I was still in Munich. I assume they
signed something while I was in Los Angeles, and the by
non-Scientologists, yes, Wogs, infiltrated Special Unit, did not tell
me about it. CMO INT, another criminal infiltrator, who barely spoke
English, blamed me for that signature and other matters, without that
I ever would have given the possibility to respond to the allegations.
It was a very non-scientological action to kick me out, in violation
with all L. Ron Hubbard justice policies.
RB claimed that Scientology International "wanted to kill me."
Fact is: They did not. Scientology infiltrators wanted to get me out
of the org, because I was in the way for them taking more of
Scientology over. They kicked me out. After I was gone, they thought
they never have to deal with me again. The German still existing Nazi
secret service wants to have me dead. And that already before I
pointed my finger on them.
RB wrote that Scientologists threw me on December 5, 1987 in the sea
of manor "Schloss Nymphenburg" in Munich.
Fact is: They did not. The one who is said having been drowned by
psychs in that sea was King Ludwig. She mixed me up with the King.
RB mailed me a document that is signed by Pfarrer Friedrich Wilhelm
Haack. The page I received is not dated. He either was asked by the
district attorney or RB's judge Krautloher in the
kidnapping/deprogramming case of 1987/88 to state his opinion. RB is
understandable upset about that, because it was Haack himself who told
her first about the criminal deprogramming and dared her to do it.
Fact is: In this statement Haack still promoted deprogramming as not
criminal and also indicated that he had contact with me and received
information by me. He is lying, he did not. I saw him a few times on
offical events as SCN opponent, and I was disgusted by him. RB called
him a liar, she claimed that I never would have confided in Haack. She
is right on this. I never called or visited him, but I remember having
received two imprudent letters end of 1989 by him, that also confirmed
what a completely unreligious and scornful man that priest was. I
think, if he would have been a catholic priest without a wife, he
would have...
RB called him: "The Satan!"
RB apparently also filed since 1984 petitions and information to the
Human Rights Commission in Geneva, and so must have other people. The
petitions and statements, that I never saw, must all contain
deliberate falsehoods to frame innocent Scientologists, mostly Mark C.
Rathbun (de Rothschild), who never harmed me in any way.
RB mailed me a copy of an evaluation dated November 21, 1988, by psych
Otto Stummer in Munich. He wrote that he saw RB on November 11, 15, 18
and 21, 1988, that he studied the two positive evaluations of the
American psychiatrists and that he came also to the conclusion that RB
is absolutely sane.
Haack, Keltsch, but also the Munich university psychs indicated that
RB would be nuts. If half of the psychs she met say she is sane, and
half of the psychs that she met say, she is insane, what does this say
about Psychiatry?
It says about Psychiatry that it is junk-science, that it is nothing
worth, because it can be interpreted in any direction, just as it
seems convenient or ordered by the mindcontroller of the psychs for
their purposes. Psychiatry is used to make people give up their
critical thoughts, their freedom of speech and psychiatry kills
people's reputation. They are also concentration camps. People are
broken physically and emotionally in institutions and also often
enough killed. Really danerous people are not locked up, but those
that psychs consider dangerous, because of their critic of psychiatry,
are in danger to end up in them to be destroyed. Psychs often also
lock others up because somebody pays them to lock somebody else up and
to declare such a person mentally ill. In other words: Psychiatric
institutions are unconstitional and against human rights.
More to come in next sequel.
Barbara Schwarz,
March 27, 2003
BarbaraSchwarz
>
> It says about psychiatry that it is junk-science, that it is nothing
> worth, because it can be interpreted in any direction, just as it
> seems convenient or ordered by the mindcontroller of the psychs for
> their purposes. Psychiatry is used to make people give up their
> critical thoughts, their freedom of speech and psychiatry kills
> people's reputation. They are also concentration camps. People are
> broken physically and emotionally in institutions and also often
> that psychs consider dangerous, because of their critic of psychiatry,
> lock others up, because somebody pays them to lock somebody else up and
> to declare such a person mentally ill. In other words: Psychiatric
>
> More to come in next sequel.
>
> Barbara Schwarz,
> March 27, 2003
Just took two typos out, that I made in a hurry, before the computer closed down.