Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
In Just One Month, The NRA Has Torpedoed Its Reputation
3 views
Skip to first unread message
John Manning
Jan 31, 2013, 9:26:08 AM1/31/13
to
BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
light for the first time.
In separate polls conducted by Public Policy Polling and the
Washington Post/ABC News, the association's favorability ratings
sit underwater with the majority of Americans.
The PPP poll shows a big shift from before CEO
Wayne LaPierre's press conference, which cast blame on
the media, and violent video games and movies for the
elementary-school massacre in Newtown, Conn., last month.
Before the press conference, 48 percent of Americans
viewed the organization in a positive light, compared with
41 percent who viewed it unfavorably.
After the press conference and a subsequent appearance
on "Meet the Press," the NRA's favorability shifted to a
42-45 negative split — a 10-point swing in three weeks.
Meanwhile, the Washington Post and ABC found that
the NRA's favorability rating is underwater for the
first time ever in their limited polling of the question.
According to the poll, only 36 percent said they have
a favorable opinion of the NRA, compared with 44 percent
who view it in a negative light.
When the WaPo/ABC last polled on the subject in 1999,
the group's favorability rating stood comfortably positive
at a 48-39 split.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-approval-ratings-press-conference-gun-control-video-games-media-2013-1
Mitchell Holman
Jan 31, 2013, 9:42:36 AM1/31/13
to
John Manning <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in
news:MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com:
The Republican Party is backtracking on its
extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
their extremism, perhaps the NRA should wake up
to the fact this is the 21st century.
news:MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com:
extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
their extremism, perhaps the NRA should wake up
to the fact this is the 21st century.
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:07:38 AM1/31/13
to
In article <MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com>, John Manning
<jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
> light for the first time.
*** Opposing background checks was the straw that broke the camel's back.
> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
> light for the first time.
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 11:14:12 AM1/31/13
to
In article <XnsA15957A86F4A8...@216.196.121.131>, Mitchell
> their extremism, ...
• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>
>
>
• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>
>
>
Dakota
Jan 31, 2013, 12:45:29 PM1/31/13
to
does it make? Pedophiles should not be permitted to be scoutmasters
though.
Message has been deleted
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 2:53:52 PM1/31/13
to
and he initiated sexual contact with some of the boys.
>Pedophiles should not be permitted to be scoutmasters.
• In the above case the assistant scoutmaster was technically an ephebophile.
> though.
duke
Jan 31, 2013, 3:27:29 PM1/31/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:26:08 -0200, John Manning <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>light for the first time.
I'm a new member.
>BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>light for the first time.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra-is-winning/
The NRA is already in the midst of a membership boom, as the actions taken by
Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************
duke
Jan 31, 2013, 3:28:39 PM1/31/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:07:38 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>In article <MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com>, John Manning
><jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>> light for the first time.
>
>
>*** Opposing background checks was the straw that broke the camel's back.
>In article <MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com>, John Manning
><jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>
>> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>> light for the first time.
>
>
>*** Opposing background checks was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Hell Stomper
Jan 31, 2013, 3:31:31 PM1/31/13
to
On Jan 31, 3:27 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
with gun and ammo sales.
Disinformation is a favored tool of the left.
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:26:08 -0200, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
> >has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
> >light for the first time.
>
> I'm a new member.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra...
> >BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
> >has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
> >light for the first time.
>
> I'm a new member.
>
> The NRA is already in the midst of a membership boom, as the actions taken by
> Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
> threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
> because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
>
> The dukester, American - American
> ********************************************
> You can't fix stupid.
> ********************************************
They are full of shit as usual. NRA membership has skyrocketed along
> Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
> threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
> because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
>
> The dukester, American - American
> ********************************************
> You can't fix stupid.
> ********************************************
with gun and ammo sales.
Disinformation is a favored tool of the left.
Message has been deleted
Jeanne Douglas
Jan 31, 2013, 5:03:44 PM1/31/13
to
In article <r-3101130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
wrote:
Why?
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
wrote:
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
Mitchell Holman
Jan 31, 2013, 5:09:50 PM1/31/13
to
r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote in news:r-3101130...@10.0.1.3:
Homosexual Scoutmasters haven't been a problem for
Girl Scouts.
http://blogs.babycenter.com/mom_stories/boy-scouts-gay-ban-07182012-girl-
scouts-gay-policy/
Girl Scouts.
http://blogs.babycenter.com/mom_stories/boy-scouts-gay-ban-07182012-girl-
scouts-gay-policy/
plainolamerican
Jan 31, 2013, 5:14:22 PM1/31/13
to
keeping honest people from owning guns empowers criminals.
Dakota
Jan 31, 2013, 5:24:21 PM1/31/13
to
On 1/31/2013 1:53 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> In article <keeajn$aef$1...@dont-email.me>, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
> In article <keeajn$aef$1...@dont-email.me>, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 1/31/2013 10:14 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
>>> In article <XnsA15957A86F4A8...@216.196.121.131>, Mitchell
>>> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Manning <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in
>>>> news:MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>>>>> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>>>>> light for the first time.
>>>>>
>>>>> In separate polls conducted by Public Policy Polling and the
>>>>> Washington Post/ABC News, the association's favorability ratings
>>>>> sit underwater with the majority of Americans.
>>>>>
>>>>> The PPP poll shows a big shift from before CEO
>>>>> Wayne LaPierre's press conference, which cast blame on
>>>>> the media, and violent video games and movies for the
>>>>> elementary-school massacre in Newtown, Conn., last month.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before the press conference, 48 percent of Americans
>>>>> viewed the organization in a positive light, compared with
>>>>> 41 percent who viewed it unfavorably.
>>>>>
>>>>> After the press conference and a subsequent appearance
>>>>> on "Meet the Press," the NRA's favorability shifted to a
>>>>> 42-45 negative split — a 10-point swing in three weeks.
>>> In article <XnsA15957A86F4A8...@216.196.121.131>, Mitchell
>>> Holman <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Manning <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in
>>>> news:MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>>>>> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>>>>> light for the first time.
>>>>>
>>>>> In separate polls conducted by Public Policy Polling and the
>>>>> Washington Post/ABC News, the association's favorability ratings
>>>>> sit underwater with the majority of Americans.
>>>>>
>>>>> The PPP poll shows a big shift from before CEO
>>>>> Wayne LaPierre's press conference, which cast blame on
>>>>> the media, and violent video games and movies for the
>>>>> elementary-school massacre in Newtown, Conn., last month.
>>>>>
>>>>> Before the press conference, 48 percent of Americans
>>>>> viewed the organization in a positive light, compared with
>>>>> 41 percent who viewed it unfavorably.
>>>>>
>>>>> After the press conference and a subsequent appearance
>>>>> on "Meet the Press," the NRA's favorability shifted to a
>>>>>
>>>>> Meanwhile, the Washington Post and ABC found that
>>>>> the NRA's favorability rating is underwater for the
>>>>> first time ever in their limited polling of the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the poll, only 36 percent said they have
>>>>> a favorable opinion of the NRA, compared with 44 percent
>>>>> who view it in a negative light.
>>>>>
>>>>> When the WaPo/ABC last polled on the subject in 1999,
>>>>> the group's favorability rating stood comfortably positive
>>>>> at a 48-39 split.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-approval-ratings-press-conference-gu
>>>>> n-control-video-games-media-2013-1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>>>> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>>>> their extremism, ...
>>>
>>> • Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>>>>> Meanwhile, the Washington Post and ABC found that
>>>>> the NRA's favorability rating is underwater for the
>>>>> first time ever in their limited polling of the question.
>>>>>
>>>>> According to the poll, only 36 percent said they have
>>>>> a favorable opinion of the NRA, compared with 44 percent
>>>>> who view it in a negative light.
>>>>>
>>>>> When the WaPo/ABC last polled on the subject in 1999,
>>>>> the group's favorability rating stood comfortably positive
>>>>> at a 48-39 split.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-approval-ratings-press-conference-gu
>>>>> n-control-video-games-media-2013-1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>>>> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>>>> their extremism, ...
>>>
>>>
>> There would never be sexual contact between them so what difference
>> does it make?
>
> • Never? . . I was in a troop with a homosexual assistant scoutmaster
> and he initiated sexual contact with some of the boys.
>
>> Pedophiles should not be permitted to be scoutmasters.
>
> • In the above case the assistant scoutmaster was technically an ephebophile.
>> though.
Was the ephebophile also gay?
>> There would never be sexual contact between them so what difference
>> does it make?
>
> • Never? . . I was in a troop with a homosexual assistant scoutmaster
> and he initiated sexual contact with some of the boys.
>
>> Pedophiles should not be permitted to be scoutmasters.
>
> • In the above case the assistant scoutmaster was technically an ephebophile.
>> though.
plainolamerican
Jan 31, 2013, 5:28:49 PM1/31/13
to
Logan Sacket
Jan 31, 2013, 5:55:02 PM1/31/13
to
coaches, priests and boy scout leaders.
Logan Sacket
Jan 31, 2013, 5:56:32 PM1/31/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:53:18 -0700, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
>>> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>>> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>>> their extremism, ...
>>
>>• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>
>If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
It didn't when I was in Boy Scouts. Years later we found out one of
our friend in the scouts was gay. Who'd a thought?
>On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
>>> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>>> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>>> their extremism, ...
>>
>>• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>
It didn't when I was in Boy Scouts. Years later we found out one of
our friend in the scouts was gay. Who'd a thought?
Message has been deleted
Logan Sacket
Jan 31, 2013, 5:58:46 PM1/31/13
to
isn't because they like camping so much.
Dakota
Jan 31, 2013, 6:11:19 PM1/31/13
to
>
> Then see how they turn out.
>
The extremism in question has nothing to do with pedophiles - it's
about homosexuals. I suspect that the Boy Scouts of America will
continue to cover up for and move the pedophiles around so they can
continue their predation.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:45:17 PM1/31/13
to
In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> >> their extremism, ...
> >
> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>
> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> >> their extremism, ...
> >
> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>
> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
• yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:46:42 PM1/31/13
to
In article <buklg89bfjmpjut15...@4ax.com>, duke
<duckg...@cox.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:07:38 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> ><jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> >> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
> >> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
> >> light for the first time.
> >
> >
> >*** Opposing background checks was the straw that broke the camel's back.
>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra-is-winning/
> The NRA is already in the midst of a membership boom, as the actions taken by
> Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
> threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
> because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
>
• ?
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 07:07:38 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <MbKdnTLf9Jli45fM...@giganews.com>, John Manning
> ><jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote:
> >
> >> BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
> >> has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
> >> light for the first time.
> >
> >
> >*** Opposing background checks was the straw that broke the camel's back.
>
>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra-is-winning/
> The NRA is already in the midst of a membership boom, as the actions taken by
> Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
> threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
> because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
>
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:49:07 PM1/31/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-F8A536...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
• Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:50:13 PM1/31/13
to
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:51:30 PM1/31/13
to
•RLMeasures
Jan 31, 2013, 10:52:48 PM1/31/13
to
In article <nm0mg89qsvj1lf4hg...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:53:52 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> There would never be sexual contact between them so what difference
> >> does it make?
> >
> >• Never? . . I was in a troop with a homosexual assistant scoutmaster
> >and he initiated sexual contact with some of the boys.
>
> Ahh.....
• different strokes for different folks
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 11:53:52 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> There would never be sexual contact between them so what difference
> >> does it make?
> >
> >• Never? . . I was in a troop with a homosexual assistant scoutmaster
> >and he initiated sexual contact with some of the boys.
>
• different strokes for different folks
Message has been deleted
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 1, 2013, 12:19:45 AM2/1/13
to
In article <r-3101131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures)
And what does that have to do with homosexual Scoutmasters? Are the Boy
Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
irrelevant.
Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
irrelevant.
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 1, 2013, 12:20:09 AM2/1/13
to
Alan Ferris
Feb 1, 2013, 4:51:28 AM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:19:45 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
>> > Why?
>>
>> • Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
>
>And what does that have to do with homosexual Scoutmasters? Are the Boy
>Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
>experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
>irrelevant.
Which is what most of the rest of the scouting world thinks.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Atheist #1211
EAC(UK)#252 Ironic Torture Div.
SERV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWhXGhv-tTo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7bsUttGho8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60mZsohBr3Q
wrote:
>> > Why?
>>
>> • Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
>
>And what does that have to do with homosexual Scoutmasters? Are the Boy
>Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
>experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
>irrelevant.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Atheist #1211
EAC(UK)#252 Ironic Torture Div.
SERV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWhXGhv-tTo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7bsUttGho8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60mZsohBr3Q
thomas p.
Feb 1, 2013, 5:21:30 AM2/1/13
to
"•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
And normal adults, homosexual or heterosexual are programmed to have sex
with other adults.
--
thomas p
Ignorance is the mother of devotion.
David Hume
news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
with other adults.
--
thomas p
Ignorance is the mother of devotion.
David Hume
thomas p.
Feb 1, 2013, 5:23:55 AM2/1/13
to
Message has been deleted
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 9:56:58 AM2/1/13
to
In article <bufmg8551gqdddk3c...@4ax.com>,
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> Not all heterosexual men like to have sex with all females
• Abundantly true but heterosexual men do not have sex with other men,
but bisexual and homosexual men do.
>
> Why would homosexual men regard everyone that way and act that way?
• Beats me but maybe they are just born that way? Different strokes for
different folks.
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
• Abundantly true but heterosexual men do not have sex with other men,
but bisexual and homosexual men do.
>
> Why would homosexual men regard everyone that way and act that way?
• Beats me but maybe they are just born that way? Different strokes for
different folks.
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 9:57:55 AM2/1/13
to
In article <kefggo$2d8$1...@solani.org>, Spokane Social Club
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 8:49 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> >> Why?
> > • Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
>
>
> And the bi males?
��€ any port in a storm?
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 8:49 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> >> Why?
> > • Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
>
>
��€ any port in a storm?
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 10:01:52 AM2/1/13
to
In article <kefgl7$2d8$1...@solani.org>, Spokane Social Club
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 8:45 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
>
> Including young non-homosexual males?
*** apparently the complainants were hetero.
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
> On 1/31/2013 8:45 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
>
*** apparently the complainants were hetero.
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 10:07:48 AM2/1/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-4E5740...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
• the problem was that this assistant scoutmaster could not keep his male
member away from boy butts. Perhaps he would have been well advised to
only hit on gay boy scouts?
member away from boy butts. Perhaps he would have been well advised to
only hit on gay boy scouts?
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 10:13:06 AM2/1/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-C3DED7...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
hetero guys are pedos and not all biguys are pedos. Not all gay guys are
pedos.
Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <r-3101131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> wrote:
>
> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> > >
> > > >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> > > >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> > > >> their extremism, ...
> > > >
> > > >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> > >
> > > If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> >
> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
> What does that have to do with pedophilia?
• Nothing. There are three kinds of pedos, straight, gay, and bi. Not all
> In article <r-3101131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> wrote:
>
> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> > >
> > > >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> > > >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> > > >> their extremism, ...
> > > >
> > > >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> > >
> > > If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> >
> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
> What does that have to do with pedophilia?
hetero guys are pedos and not all biguys are pedos. Not all gay guys are
pedos.
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 10:14:27 AM2/1/13
to
In article <510b9727$0$56791$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
• Are you saying that bisexuality is normal?
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 10:20:16 AM2/1/13
to
In article <510b97b8$0$56783$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
homosexual guys.
<gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> >> >> their extremism, ...
> >> >
> >> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> >>
> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> >
> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
>
>
> Other male adults.
• Some do and others are into boys. In Islam the heavenly reward is
> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> >> >> their extremism, ...
> >> >
> >> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> >>
> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> >
> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
>
>
> Other male adults.
beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
homosexual guys.
Spokane Social Club
Feb 1, 2013, 11:38:05 AM2/1/13
to
On 2/1/2013 8:07 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
>> And what does that have to do with homosexual Scoutmasters? Are the Boy
>> >Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
>> >experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
>> >irrelevant.
> • the problem was that this assistant scoutmaster could not keep his male
> member away from boy butts. Perhaps he would have been well advised to
> only hit on gay boy scouts?
Do you think that's a sound thesis going forward?
>> And what does that have to do with homosexual Scoutmasters? Are the Boy
>> >Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
>> >experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
>> >irrelevant.
> • the problem was that this assistant scoutmaster could not keep his male
> member away from boy butts. Perhaps he would have been well advised to
> only hit on gay boy scouts?
Do you think there are enough self-professed "gay scouts" to keep his
needs met?
Spokane Social Club
Feb 1, 2013, 11:40:00 AM2/1/13
to
On 2/1/2013 8:13 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> Not all gay guys are pedos.
How many would it take to constitute a real peril to youngsters?
> Not all gay guys are pedos.
Spokane Social Club
Feb 1, 2013, 11:41:55 AM2/1/13
to
On 2/1/2013 8:20 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
>> Other male adults.
> • Some do and others are into boys. In Islam the heavenly reward is
> beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
> homosexual guys.
Isn't Islam accommodating...
>> Other male adults.
> • Some do and others are into boys. In Islam the heavenly reward is
> beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
> homosexual guys.
duke
Feb 1, 2013, 2:50:24 PM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:31:31 -0800 (PST), Hell Stomper <stardu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>On Jan 31, 3:27 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra...
>> ********************************************
>> You can't fix stupid.
>> ********************************************
>
>They are full of shit as usual. NRA membership has skyrocketed along
>with gun and ammo sales.
>Disinformation is a favored tool of the left.
That's for sure.
The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************
wrote:
>On Jan 31, 3:27 pm, duke <duckgumb...@cox.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:26:08 -0200, John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote:
>> >BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>> >has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>> >light for the first time.
>>
>> I'm a new member.
>> >BusinessInsider - The overall favorability rating of the NRA
>> >has plunged in the last month, putting its image in a negative
>> >light for the first time.
>>
>>
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/18/how-the-nra...
>> The NRA is already in the midst of a membership boom, as the actions taken by
>> Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
>> threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
>> because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
>>
>> The dukester, American - American
>> Obama — and, in particular, his executive orders — convince people that the
>> threat of the government seizing guns or limiting gun ownership is real and,
>> because it is, a counter-weight to that government is needed.
>>
>> ********************************************
>> You can't fix stupid.
>> ********************************************
>
>They are full of shit as usual. NRA membership has skyrocketed along
>with gun and ammo sales.
>Disinformation is a favored tool of the left.
That's for sure.
The dukester, American - American
********************************************
You can't fix stupid.
********************************************
thomas p.
Feb 1, 2013, 3:00:37 PM2/1/13
to
"•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0102130...@10.0.1.3...
attracted to adults. I said nothing, one way or the other about bisexuals.
I do not see why you thought I did. On the other hand, since you ask, the
same thing applies, an adult bisexual is attracted to adults of either sex.
In other words being homosexual, heterosexual or bisexuals does not make a
person a threat to children or to anyone for that matter. It is also hard
to understand why you would think so.
thomas p.
Feb 1, 2013, 3:01:51 PM2/1/13
to
What is the problem?
thomas p.
Feb 1, 2013, 3:06:14 PM2/1/13
to
"•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0102130...@10.0.1.3...
> In article <510b97b8$0$56783$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
> <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
>> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
>> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
>> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>> >> >> their extremism, ...
>> >> >
>> >> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>> >>
>> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
>> >
>> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>>
>>
>>
>> Other male adults.
>
> • Some do and others are into boys.
And some heterosexual males are "into boys" or children for that matter.
> <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
>> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
>> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
>> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>> >> >> their extremism, ...
>> >> >
>> >> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>> >>
>> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
>> >
>> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>>
>>
>>
>> Other male adults.
>
> • Some do and others are into boys.
Clearly the problem is not either homosexuality or heterosexuality.
In Islam the heavenly reward is
> beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
> homosexual guys.
John Manning
Feb 1, 2013, 4:46:06 PM2/1/13
to
each other.
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:01:44 PM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:57:48 -0800, Morgoth Bauglir
<Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:42:36 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>>>their extremism, perhaps the NRA should wake up
>>>to the fact this is the 21st century.
>>>
>>
>> It is not extremism to want to keep your boys away from pedophile
>> coaches, priests and boy scout leaders.
>
>So keep them locked up at home until they're 25.
>
>Then see how they turn out.
If they turn out not to be pedifiles, that would be the better choice
<Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:42:36 -0600, Mitchell Holman
>>>to the fact this is the 21st century.
>>>
>>
>> It is not extremism to want to keep your boys away from pedophile
>> coaches, priests and boy scout leaders.
>
>So keep them locked up at home until they're 25.
>
>Then see how they turn out.
If they turn out not to be pedifiles, that would be the better choice
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:02:33 PM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:11:19 -0600, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
wrote:
>The extremism in question has nothing to do with pedophiles - it's
>about homosexuals. I suspect that the Boy Scouts of America will
>continue to cover up for and move the pedophiles around so they can
>continue their predation.
What? You're sick.
wrote:
>about homosexuals. I suspect that the Boy Scouts of America will
>continue to cover up for and move the pedophiles around so they can
>continue their predation.
What? You're sick.
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:03:41 PM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 15:12:27 -0800, Morgoth Bauglir
<Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:03:44 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
>> isn't because they like camping so much.
>
>So you'll allow them in (they aren't likely to admit that they're
>pedophiles), but ban the openly homosexual ones.
Hell no, I wouldn't let Homosexual Scoutmasters in.
<Mel...@Mordor.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:03:44 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
>> <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <r-3101130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article <XnsA15957A86F4A8...@216.196.121.131>, Mitchell
>>
>>>In article <r-3101130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> > their extremism, ...
>>>>
>>>> • Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>>>
>>>
>>>Why?
>>
>> Many times there is a reason homosexuals become Scoutmasters, and it
>>>>
>>>> • Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>>>
>>>
>>>Why?
>>
>> isn't because they like camping so much.
>
>So you'll allow them in (they aren't likely to admit that they're
>pedophiles), but ban the openly homosexual ones.
Hell no, I wouldn't let Homosexual Scoutmasters in.
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:05:43 PM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:34:55 -0700, Spokane Social Club
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
>On 1/31/2013 8:45 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
>On 1/31/2013 8:45 PM, •RLMeasures wrote:
>>> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
>> • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>
>
>Including young non-homosexual males?
Of course, don't you keep up with things?
>
>
>Including young non-homosexual males?
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:06:48 PM2/1/13
to
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:19:45 -0800, Jeanne Douglas
That's the problem, some Boy Scouts get more education than their
merit badges show.
merit badges show.
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:09:41 PM2/1/13
to
Logan Sacket
Feb 1, 2013, 6:12:49 PM2/1/13
to
sully
Feb 1, 2013, 6:50:22 PM2/1/13
to
On Feb 1, 3:02 pm, logan.sac...@gmail.com (Logan Sacket) wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:11:19 -0600, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 1/31/2013 4:57 PM, Morgoth Bauglir wrote:
>
> >>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:42:36 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> >>> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
> >>>> John Manning <jrobe...@terra.com.br> wrote in
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 17:11:19 -0600, Dakota <ma...@NOSPAMmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On 1/31/2013 4:57 PM, Morgoth Bauglir wrote:
>
> >>> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:42:36 -0600, Mitchell Holman
> >>> <nomailverizon.net> wrote:
>
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57535352/boy-scout-files-show-sex-abuse-cover-ups/
Dakota is pointing out how the BSA maintain an anti-homosexuality
stance while simultaneously covering up actions of predators in the
BSA ranks.
Dakota
Feb 1, 2013, 8:19:59 PM2/1/13
to
�RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 8:37:52 PM2/1/13
to
In article <kegr6a$boh$5...@solani.org>, Spokane Social Club
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
> On 2/1/2013 8:14 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> >> And normal adults, homosexual or heterosexual are programmed to have sex
> >> >with other adults.
> > • Are you saying that bisexuality is normal?
>
> Are you saying it is not somewhere along the std. normal distribution curve?
�� Dog humpers are somewhere along the normal distribution curve.
<s...@kane.invalid> wrote:
> On 2/1/2013 8:14 AM, •RLMeasures wrote:
> >> And normal adults, homosexual or heterosexual are programmed to have sex
> >> >with other adults.
> > • Are you saying that bisexuality is normal?
>
�� Dog humpers are somewhere along the normal distribution curve.
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 1, 2013, 8:38:49 PM2/1/13
to
In article <m37og8dl2iq3d2i2j...@4ax.com>,
Increased NRA membership is irrelevant to the fact that 74% of NRA
members are in favor of mandatory background checks for all gun sales.
According to a poll done by a Republican.
<http://www.mayorsagainstillegalguns.org/html/media-center/pr006-12.shtml
>
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
members are in favor of mandatory background checks for all gun sales.
According to a poll done by a Republican.
<http://www.mayorsagainstillegalguns.org/html/media-center/pr006-12.shtml
>
--
JD
"Osama Bin Laden is dead and GM is alive."--VP Joseph Biden
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 8:40:30 PM2/1/13
to
In article <510c1f08$0$56796$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
• I don't. Pedophiles come in three varieties.
�RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 8:42:16 PM2/1/13
to
In article <510c1f51$0$56787$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
<gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
� The potential problem is that some homosexual adults are into boy butts.
<gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
•RLMeasures
Feb 1, 2013, 8:46:35 PM2/1/13
to
In article <510c2058$0$56775$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
• An adult male who is into boy butt is by definition not a heterosexual
no matter what he claims to be.
>or children for that matter.
> Clearly the problem is not either homosexuality or heterosexuality.
• correct.
<gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:r-0102130...@10.0.1.3...
> > In article <510b97b8$0$56783$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
> > <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
> >> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
> >> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> >> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> >> >> >> their extremism, ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> >> >>
> >> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> >> >
> >> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Other male adults.
> >
> > • Some do and others are into boys.
>
> And some heterosexual males are "into boys" ...
> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
> news:r-0102130...@10.0.1.3...
> > In article <510b97b8$0$56783$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
> > <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "•RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
> >> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
> >> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
> >> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> >> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> >> >> >> their extremism, ...
> >> >> >
> >> >> >• Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> >> >>
> >> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
> >> >
> >> > • yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Other male adults.
> >
> > • Some do and others are into boys.
>
• An adult male who is into boy butt is by definition not a heterosexual
no matter what he claims to be.
>or children for that matter.
> Clearly the problem is not either homosexuality or heterosexuality.
>
>
> In Islam the heavenly reward is
> > beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
> > homosexual guys.
>
>
> Irrelevant true or not.
• it is in the Quran in three places.
>
> In Islam the heavenly reward is
> > beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
> > homosexual guys.
>
>
> Irrelevant true or not.
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 2, 2013, 7:42:15 AM2/2/13
to
In article <r-0102131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
And so are just as many heterosexual adults.
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 2, 2013, 7:42:46 AM2/2/13
to
In article <r-0102130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-4E5740...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> > > Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <r-3101130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
wrote:
> In article <hlwdjsd2-4E5740...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
> Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <r-3101131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In article <hlwdjsd2-F8A536...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
>
> > In article <r-3101131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > In article <r-3101130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> > > > > > The Republican Party is backtracking on its
> > > > > > extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> > > > > > their extremism, ...
> > > > >
> > > > > • Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
> > > > > > their extremism, ...
> > > > >
> > > > > • Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Why?
> > >
> > > • Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
> >
> > >
> > > • Because hetero males are programmed to have sex with females. .
> >
> > And what does that have to do with homosexual Scoutmasters? Are the Boy
> > Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
> > experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
> > irrelevant.
>
> > Scouts teaching their boys about sex, completely with practical
> > experience? If they're not, the orientation of the Scoutmaster is
> > irrelevant.
>
> • the problem was that this assistant scoutmaster could not keep his male
> member away from boy butts. Perhaps he would have been well advised to
> only hit on gay boy scouts?
Because that would still be pedophilia.
> member away from boy butts. Perhaps he would have been well advised to
> only hit on gay boy scouts?
thomas p.
Feb 2, 2013, 8:57:44 AM2/2/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0102131...@10.0.1.3...
I wonder if you are trying to be amusing. Is that it?
news:r-0102131...@10.0.1.3...
thomas p.
Feb 2, 2013, 8:59:06 AM2/2/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0102131...@10.0.1.3...
thomas p.
Feb 2, 2013, 9:02:26 AM2/2/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0102131...@10.0.1.3...
a heterosexual. He can also can be a pedophile who enjoys sex with little
boys.
>
>>or children for that matter.
>> Clearly the problem is not either homosexuality or heterosexuality.
>
> � correct.
>>
>>
>> In Islam the heavenly reward is
>> > beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
>> > homosexual guys.
>>
>>
>> Irrelevant true or not.
>
> � it is in the Quran in three places.
I do not deny it. It has no relevance for this discussion, which is what I
said.
news:r-0102131...@10.0.1.3...
> In article <510c2058$0$56775$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
> <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
>> news:r-0102130...@10.0.1.3...
>> > In article <510b97b8$0$56783$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas
>> > p."
>> > <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
>> >> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
>> >> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
>> >> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures)
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>> >> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>> >> >> >> their extremism, ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >� Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
>> >> >
>> >> > � yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Other male adults.
>> >
>> > � Some do and others are into boys.
>>
>> And some heterosexual males are "into boys" ...
>
> � An adult male who is into boy butt is by definition not a heterosexual
> no matter what he claims to be.
An adult male who only has adult sexual relationships with adult females is
> <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> "�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
>> news:r-0102130...@10.0.1.3...
>> > In article <510b97b8$0$56783$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas
>> > p."
>> > <gud...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> "�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
>> >> news:r-3101131...@10.0.1.3...
>> >> > In article <nsilg81vn6ner1m3v...@4ax.com>,
>> >> > Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:14:12 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures)
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The Republican Party is backtracking on its
>> >> >> >> extremism, the Boy Scouts are backtracking on
>> >> >> >> their extremism, ...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >� Heterosexual Boy Scouts do not need homosexual Scoutmasters.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If no one said which they were---why would it matter?
>> >> >
>> >> > � yes because homosexual males like to have sex with other males.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Other male adults.
>> >
>> > � Some do and others are into boys.
>>
>> And some heterosexual males are "into boys" ...
>
> � An adult male who is into boy butt is by definition not a heterosexual
> no matter what he claims to be.
a heterosexual. He can also can be a pedophile who enjoys sex with little
boys.
>
>>or children for that matter.
>> Clearly the problem is not either homosexuality or heterosexuality.
>
> � correct.
>>
>>
>> In Islam the heavenly reward is
>> > beautiful virgin females for heterosexual guys and beautiful boys for
>> > homosexual guys.
>>
>>
>> Irrelevant true or not.
>
> � it is in the Quran in three places.
said.
•RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:17:21 AM2/2/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-F80C68...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
• Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys. The label of
heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual is not self-assigned, it is
determined by one's history. Thus there are no heterosexual male boy
fuckers.
heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual is not self-assigned, it is
determined by one's history. Thus there are no heterosexual male boy
fuckers.
�RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:19:59 AM2/2/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-D21CAA...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
� Boy Scouts are for the most part post-pubescent -- which makes the
adult a ephebophile, not a pedophile.
adult a ephebophile, not a pedophile.
•RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:21:23 AM2/2/13
to
�RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:26:25 AM2/2/13
to
In article <510d1ba6$0$56787$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
� Not so. By definition heterosexuals only have sex with the opposite
sex. A male that has sex with females and males is bisexual no matter
how he labels himself.
>Once again I ask what is
> the problem?
� The problem was that the assistant scoutmaster was homosexual and he
was messing with heterosexual boys.
sex. A male that has sex with females and males is bisexual no matter
how he labels himself.
>Once again I ask what is
> the problem?
was messing with heterosexual boys.
�RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:30:27 AM2/2/13
to
In article <510d1c6d$0$56787$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
� then he is bisexual no matter what he says.
>
... snip ...
>
... snip ...
Alan Ferris
Feb 2, 2013, 2:37:45 PM2/2/13
to
On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:42:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>> Then you have no rational reason to be against homosexual scout masters.
>> What is the problem?
>
>� The potential problem is that some homosexual adults are into boy butts.
And so are heterosexual men. So why not ban all men?
>> Then you have no rational reason to be against homosexual scout masters.
>> What is the problem?
>
>� The potential problem is that some homosexual adults are into boy butts.
--
Ferrit
()'.'.'()
( (T) )
( ) . ( )
(")_(")
Atheist #1211
EAC(UK)#252 Ironic Torture Div.
SERV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWhXGhv-tTo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7bsUttGho8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60mZsohBr3Q
Alan Ferris
Feb 2, 2013, 2:38:26 PM2/2/13
to
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:17:21 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>� Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys.
Are you really this dumb? Or do you need to convince yourself this so you can
sleep easy at night?
>� Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys.
Are you really this dumb? Or do you need to convince yourself this so you can
sleep easy at night?
•RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 3:13:16 PM2/2/13
to
In article <onqqg8l65cuq8fo69...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
sex. A man who has sex with women as well as with boys is bisexual, not
herterosexual.
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:42:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> Then you have no rational reason to be against homosexual scout masters.
> >> What is the problem?
> >
> >• The potential problem is that some homosexual adults are into boy butts.
>
> And so are heterosexual men. So why not ban all men?
> --
• By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
> On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:42:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >> Then you have no rational reason to be against homosexual scout masters.
> >> What is the problem?
> >
> >• The potential problem is that some homosexual adults are into boy butts.
>
> And so are heterosexual men. So why not ban all men?
> --
sex. A man who has sex with women as well as with boys is bisexual, not
herterosexual.
�RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 3:14:23 PM2/2/13
to
In article <koqqg8dmd362cngfc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:17:21 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >� Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys.
>
> Are you really this dumb? Or do you need to convince yourself this so
you can
> sleep easy at night?
> --
� So the OED means nothing?
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:17:21 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >� Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys.
>
> Are you really this dumb? Or do you need to convince yourself this so
you can
> sleep easy at night?
> --
duke
Feb 2, 2013, 3:23:07 PM2/2/13
to
On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:38:49 -0800, Jeanne Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com>
wrote:
I had one. It took about 20 minutes on the computer. What do you suppose a
background check is?
wrote:
background check is?
Alan Ferris
Feb 2, 2013, 5:30:17 PM2/2/13
to
preference to the OED? You daily are getting more and more like Earl.
Alan Ferris
Feb 2, 2013, 5:31:52 PM2/2/13
to
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>� By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
>sex
With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
>� By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
>sex
With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 2, 2013, 9:33:23 PM2/2/13
to
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 2, 2013, 9:34:16 PM2/2/13
to
In article <r-0202130...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
wrote:
Why do you think you're entitled to make up your definitions?
wrote:
�RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:00:19 PM2/2/13
to
In article <kp4rg8p9j80mul3ju...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
>Do you really ignore all medical studies in
> preference to the OED? You daily are getting more and more like Earl.
> --
� I'm nowheres close to 300lbs Alan.
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:14:23 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <koqqg8dmd362cngfc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> ><hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:17:21 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >� Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys.
> >>
> >> Are you really this dumb? Or do you need to convince yourself this so
> >you can
> >> sleep easy at night?
> >> --
> >� So the OED means nothing?
>
> What has the OED to do with this?
� it has definitions
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:14:23 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <koqqg8dmd362cngfc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> ><hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 07:17:21 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >� Heterosexual male means he is into girls, not boys.
> >>
> >> Are you really this dumb? Or do you need to convince yourself this so
> >you can
> >> sleep easy at night?
> >> --
> >� So the OED means nothing?
>
> What has the OED to do with this?
>Do you really ignore all medical studies in
> preference to the OED? You daily are getting more and more like Earl.
> --
�RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:03:19 PM2/2/13
to
In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >� By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
> >sex
>
> With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
>
> Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
> --
� heterosexuals do not have homosexual relations.
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (�RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >� By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
> >sex
>
> With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
>
> Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
> --
•RLMeasures
Feb 2, 2013, 10:05:49 PM2/2/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-7ADC1A...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
• I looked up heterosexual in the American Heritage Dictionary.
Jeanne Douglas
Feb 3, 2013, 12:49:39 AM2/3/13
to
Alan Ferris
Feb 3, 2013, 4:11:30 AM2/3/13
to
On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:03:19 -0800, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
><hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (�ｿｽRLMeasures) wrote:
>In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
><hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> >�ｿｽ By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
>> >sex
>>
>> With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
>>
>> Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
>> --
>�ｿｽ heterosexuals do not have homosexual relations.
>>
>> With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
>>
>> Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
>> --
Lovely Earlism.
Myth 4 �ｿｽ Most men who sexually abuse boys are gay.
Studies about this question suggest that men who have sexually abused a boy
most often identify as heterosexual and often are involved in adult
heterosexual relationships at the time of abusive interaction. There is no
indication that a gay man is more likely to engage in sexually abusive behavior
than a straight man and some studies even suggest it is less likely. But sexual
abuse is not a sexual �ｿｽrelationship,�ｿｽ �ｿｽ it�ｿｽs an assault. The sexual orientation
of the abusive person is not really relevant to the abusive interaction. A man
who sexually abuses or exploits boys is not engaging in a homosexual
interaction �ｿｽ any more than men who sexually abuse or exploit girls are
engaging in heterosexual behavior. He is a deeply confused individual who, for
various reasons, desires to sexually use or abuse a child, and has acted on
that desire.
http://1in6.org/men/myths/
Why Do People Sexually Use or Abuse Children?
http://1in6.org/men/get-information/online-readings/others-who-were-involved-or-not/why-do-people-sexually-use-or-abuse-children/
Alan Ferris
Feb 3, 2013, 4:12:15 AM2/3/13
to
thomas p.
Feb 3, 2013, 4:32:15 AM2/3/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0202130...@10.0.1.3...
Which, of course, was not what I was talking about. In any event it is
difficult for me to accept that you are actually being serious, but perhaps
you are.
news:r-0202130...@10.0.1.3...
difficult for me to accept that you are actually being serious, but perhaps
you are.
thomas p.
Feb 3, 2013, 4:36:29 AM2/3/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0202130...@10.0.1.3...
interested in sex with adults of the opposite sex are heterosexuals. A
number of pedophiles are heterosexuals who like sex with children male or
female. This is a fact that you continue to ignore.
>
>>Once again I ask what is
>> the problem?
>
> � The problem was that the assistant scoutmaster was homosexual and he
> was messing with heterosexual boys.
thomas p.
Feb 3, 2013, 4:40:27 AM2/3/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0202130...@10.0.1.3...
Furthermore you do not get to use your own definitions. There are books on
the subject, and you have referred to one of them yourself as support; yet
you ignore anything that disagrees with you.
thomas p.
Feb 3, 2013, 4:42:50 AM2/3/13
to
"�RLMeasures" <r...@somis.org> skrev i meddelelsen
news:r-0202131...@10.0.1.3...
Surely you are not dumb enough to think the above is a valid response.
news:r-0202131...@10.0.1.3...
•RLMeasures
Feb 3, 2013, 7:42:04 AM2/3/13
to
In article <hlwdjsd2-50694E...@news.giganews.com>, Jeanne
homosexual relations?
Douglas <hlwd...@NOSPAMgmail.com> wrote:
> In article <r-0202131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> wrote:
>
> > In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> > <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> > >
> > > >• By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
> > > >sex
> > >
> > > With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
> > >
> > > Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
> > > --
> > • heterosexuals do not have homosexual relations.
>
> Of course they do.
• So it does not matter that a self-declared "heterosexual" has
> In article <r-0202131...@10.0.1.3>, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures)
> wrote:
>
> > In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> > <hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> > >
> > > >• By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
> > > >sex
> > >
> > > With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
> > >
> > > Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
> > > --
> > • heterosexuals do not have homosexual relations.
>
> Of course they do.
homosexual relations?
•RLMeasures
Feb 3, 2013, 7:48:25 AM2/3/13
to
In article <bq9sg8h9qg194dhp1...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:03:19 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> ><hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:13:16 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
> >>
> >> >• By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
>
> Lovely Earlism.
>
>
> Myth 4 — Most men who sexually abuse boys are gay.
• Men who have sex with boys are either bisexual or homosexual. Men who
have sex only with women are neither.
Self-identification does not trump reality.
end
> Studies about this question suggest that men who have sexually abused a boy
> most often identify as heterosexual and often are involved in adult
> heterosexual relationships at the time of abusive interaction. There is no
> indication that a gay man is more likely to engage in sexually abusive
behavior
> than a straight man and some studies even suggest it is less likely. But
sexual
> abuse is not a sexual “relationship,” — it’s an assault. The sexual
<hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On Sat, 02 Feb 2013 19:03:19 -0800, r...@somis.org (•RLMeasures) wrote:
>
> >In article <8s4rg8tekor2flklc...@4ax.com>, Alan Ferris
> ><hairy....@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> >• By definition heterosexuals have sex exclusively with the opposite
> >> >sex
> >>
> >> With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
> >>
> >> Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
> >> --
> >• heterosexuals do not have homosexual relations.
> >>
> >> With consenting adults of the opposite sex.
> >>
> >> Hello Earl 2. Ignore all evidence to push your own bigotry.
> >> --
>
> Lovely Earlism.
>
>
> Myth 4 — Most men who sexually abuse boys are gay.
• Men who have sex with boys are either bisexual or homosexual. Men who
have sex only with women are neither.
Self-identification does not trump reality.
end
> Studies about this question suggest that men who have sexually abused a boy
> most often identify as heterosexual and often are involved in adult
> heterosexual relationships at the time of abusive interaction. There is no
> indication that a gay man is more likely to engage in sexually abusive
behavior
> than a straight man and some studies even suggest it is less likely. But
sexual
orientation
> of the abusive person is not really relevant to the abusive interaction. A man
> who sexually abuses or exploits boys is not engaging in a homosexual
> interaction – any more than men who sexually abuse or exploit girls are
> of the abusive person is not really relevant to the abusive interaction. A man
> who sexually abuses or exploits boys is not engaging in a homosexual
•RLMeasures
Feb 3, 2013, 7:49:55 AM2/3/13
to
•RLMeasures
Feb 3, 2013, 7:55:21 AM2/3/13
to
In article <510e2e9a$0$56794$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
• the 3 types of pedophiles and ephebophiles are hetero, homo, and bi. . .
A 26-yr old female bisexual friend told me that all women are bisexual
although some do not realize it yet.
A 26-yr old female bisexual friend told me that all women are bisexual
although some do not realize it yet.
•RLMeasures
Feb 3, 2013, 8:00:31 AM2/3/13
to
In article <510e2f98$0$56788$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
• The reality was that the homosexual assistant scoutmaster had a bad
effect on the troop because he going after hetero boys. As I see it he
would have done well as a leader in a gay Boy Scout troop.
effect on the troop because he going after hetero boys. As I see it he
would have done well as a leader in a gay Boy Scout troop.
•RLMeasures
Feb 3, 2013, 8:04:06 AM2/3/13
to
In article <510e3085$0$56795$edfa...@dtext02.news.tele.dk>, "thomas p."
• I usually use the American Heritage Dictionary. Hetero means with the
opposite sex, homo means with the same sex.
opposite sex, homo means with the same sex.
It is loading more messages.
0 new messages