>
> > My methods continue to be the same - quiet (sort of lol) & non-
> > confrontational yet effective. You ask why I am "protecting them".. I'm
> > not. I'm protecting my years worth of work because it has paid off for
> > me, and continues to pay off. Name calling, screeching usenet posts and
> > the posting of R/L info doesn't save children - quality information does.
>
> Thank you for putting it so eloquently; maybe because it's /you/ who is
> saying it, they'll be inclined to listen, for once.
I for one, don't agree so I wouldn't count on it.
> > What would be gained by posting TomBas name and address?
>
> Nothing, except they would have a real-life target upon which to vent their
> considerable spleen.
Actually it's not really important. Bob outed just about everybody
else.
> > Are you going to inform his neighbors?
>
> Not likely, because that might be considered as harassment;
1. Nothing will happen. Nobody cares what happens to Pedophiles.
2. It would be impossible to find the persons in question since the
UTB are perfectly cloaked
> they would also
> have to get off their rear ends and do something.
>
> > Considering where and how I got his information, I'm pretty sure they
> > already know.
>
> I think that's a safe bet.
I think it's a safe3 bet the UTB will find Tomba although it hasn't
been proven
conclusively that the Pedophile stinking up usenet as 'Tomba' isn't
Jeffery Perry
>
> > Would it help protect children? I don't see how it would? LE knows who
> > he is already - so what exactly would you do with that info that would be
> > beneficial to children in the long run?
>
> Absolutely nothing. Protecting children isn't what it's about for them,
> rather I think it's all about /schadenfreude/ -- it's all about their own
> amusement -- any purported benefits to children are just secondary.
You're frothing at the mouth again.
>
> > We have the same goals, just different methods.
>
> I think that the differences are more fundamental than that.
What you think is inconsequential.
>
> > I haven't always agreed with you and Bob just as I haven't always agreed
> > with rikijo - yet that doesn't mean we can't work towards the same end
> > in our own different ways. You say you "admire and respect" me for my
> > principles and what I stand for. If that is true than I also would hope
> > that you can see my lack of disclosure as a positive thing rather than a
> > "protect the predator" angle.. I want nothing more than to see everybody
> > who has ever touched a child to, at a minimum, be locked up forever.
> > Personally, I would prefer that they be skinned alive and rolled in a vat
> > of salt. But that isn't my call - all I can do is gather information and
> > turn my packages over to LE. My methods have a high success rate - why
> > fuck with what works? :)
>
> It will be interesting to see their responses.
See my response.
> Baal <B...@Usenet.org>
> PGP Key:http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1E92C0E8
> PGP Key Fingerprint: 40E4 E9BB D084 22D5 3DE9 66B8 08E3 638C 1E92 C0E8
> Retired Lecturer, Encryption and Data Security, Pedo U, Usenet Campus
> - --
>
> Name calling, screeching usenet posts and the posting of R/L info doesn't
> save children -- quality information [given to law-enforcement] does.
> -- Psyko
>
> Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?" -- "Who will watch the Watchmen?"
> -- Juvenal, Satires, VI, 347. circa 128 AD
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJK4MH2AAoJEAjjY4weksDo41wH/iBSIdKcl66wGCooomSKS7jG
> mlrH3S4DP+3XIinBuU9SOPrV+wrET2oYBglIp+toBsOpsX+OMdEm4yDEee0mn/vZ
> R4kUl/pm1VzzaKKIa3Nu9MNmiGEC7fmMHPGttDROKbcmJ9xc25HpPVXpobR3A4V7
> /1xDoHmk24U+SpJ5qHbMKnquSYUbTSZ1o2cQsykK8i6SnGU5Ph3hJ89HYuh8aHNV
> BNB/RrAALlGYVcsjUoCK6LkJGyxe5sxpzXx6qr4LlzHoq3EwjUwmlBW3JrGaK5hc
> 84uihTroId9qaQ+diE0AP9yDc3Jq0da62ll6Gryv4JWAiSA64f597LKRHXMVxFw=
> =lcZr
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
I see you finally found out that the silly tagline about Bob only made
you look like
the uneducated, uncouth Pedophile. you are.
DD
>Actually it's not really important. Bob outed just about everybody
>else.
Bob's being used for his idiocy.
>> Not likely, because that might be considered as harassment;
>1. Nothing will happen. Nobody cares what happens to Pedophiles.
Bob is just as much of a pedophile as the alleged pedophiles he's
claimed to have outed.
>2. It would be impossible to find the persons in question since the
> UTB are perfectly cloaked
Famous last words. LOL
The problem with going RL on anybody, is that when you cross that
line, you inadvertently expose yourself in the process. It is,
absolutely impossible to act on that level whilst retaining anonymity.
Anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot playing around with dynamite.
>I think it's a safe3 bet the UTB will find Tomba although it hasn't
>been proven
>conclusively that the Pedophile stinking up usenet as 'Tomba' isn't
>Jeffery Perry
Or anyone else for that matter. That's the fun thing about the
Internet, anyone can be anyone else, claim whatever they like...and
there's enough stupid ass n00bs like Bob and Carole that will blindly
believe anything thrown their way.
They're also stupid enough to believe that even if they had some
pedophile's dox that they would even be able to do anything...other
than make idiots out of themselves. Calling up their neighbors, LOL,
what are you 13 years old? I can just imagine how *THAT* conversation
would go:
: Neighbor: "Hello?"
: Bob: "Yes, hello, I'm from the Internet."
: Neighbor: "You're uh...yer what?"
: Bob: "I'm from the Internet! Geez, don't you know anything?"
: Neighbor: "Uh...okay...what the hell do you want?"
: Bob: "It's about your neighbor."
: Neighbor: "My neighbor?"
: Bob: "Yes, they're a pedophile!"
: Neighbor: "Uh...they are?"
: Bob: "Yes I read it on the Interwebs so it *MUST* be true."
: Neighbor: "...uh, right."
: Bob: "Well, what are you going to do about it?!"
: Neighbor: "...hang up?"
: Bob: "YOU BETTER TAKE THIS SERIOUSLY GAWD DAMMIT!!1!"
: Neighbor: "Geez man, you sound really upset. Did momma take the titty away too soon or what?"
: Bob: "So then you support your pedophile neighbor then! That means *YOUR* a pedophile too then!"
: Neighbor: "It does huh?"
: Bob: "You're going to go to JAIL you evil pedophile!"
: Neighbor: "Uh huh, well you let me know how that all works out for ya, mmmkay?"
: *hangs up*
: Neighbor: "Yeesh, crazy idiot, I don't even *HAVE* a neighbor."
>> Absolutely nothing. Protecting children isn't what it's about for them,
>> rather I think it's all about /schadenfreude/ -- it's all about their own
>> amusement -- any purported benefits to children are just secondary.
>You're frothing at the mouth again.
Oh what delicious irony.
>> I think that the differences are more fundamental than that.
>What I think is inconsequential.
I fixed yer typo! ^__^
See I'm all sorts of helpful like that.
>I see you finally found out that the silly tagline about Bob only made
>you look like
>the uneducated, uncouth Pedophile. you are.
Yeah *EVERYBODY* who doesn't slurp Bob's ass *MUST* be a pedophile.
*nods*
You know what they say about how it's always the person you *LEAST*
suspect...yeah...10 to 1 says Bob and Carole are both into kiddy
diddling and have quite the collection of child pornography on their
computer...of course I'd be willin to bet that if they ever got caught
they'd try and claim that it was for "research" to try and track down
the *REAL* pedophiles...*snicker*...yeah, right.
It really isn't that uncommon you know...for pedophiles to attack
their own kind in an effort to attempt to pass themselves off as
normal...Bob and Carole both fit pretty well into that category.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm � x �
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.uncensored-inter.net
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"Never do to anyone online what you wouldn't want done to yourself."
"Freedom, true freedom, is nothing more than intellectual advantage over others."
"When I listen to people I don't really listen to what it is they're
saying, so much as what they're saying it for."
"Don't ever fuck with someone who has more creativity than you do."
"Never use your own limitations as the basis of measuring a technology's worth."
"I don't make mistakes, I have other people to make mistakes for me."
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Usenet Filters/Blinders - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
Bob is a shrewd usenetizen. You should aspire to be as good.
>
> >> Not likely, because that might be considered as harassment;
> >1. Nothing will happen. Nobody cares what happens to Pedophiles.
>
> Bob is just as much of a pedophile as the alleged pedophiles he's
> claimed to have outed.
And how do you know this?
>
> >2. It would be impossible to find the persons in question since the
> > UTB are perfectly cloaked
>
> Famous last words. LOL
I have been doing this for over 12 years myself. If I had any last
words
as you foolishly put it, I would have typed them long ago.
Your ignorance is astounding. All that needs to be done is mail the
information
from the sex offender websites or whatever to neighbors, family or
anybody
you want to know.
>
> >> Absolutely nothing. Protecting children isn't what it's about for them,
> >> rather I think it's all about /schadenfreude/ -- it's all about their own
> >> amusement -- any purported benefits to children are just secondary.
> >You're frothing at the mouth again.
>
> Oh what delicious irony.
Again how do you know this?
>
> >> I think that the differences are more fundamental than that.
> >What I think is inconsequential.
>
> I fixed yer typo! ^__^
>
> See I'm all sorts of helpful like that.
>
> >I see you finally found out that the silly tagline about Bob only made
> >you look like
> >the uneducated, uncouth Pedophile. you are.
>
> Yeah *EVERYBODY* who doesn't slurp Bob's ass *MUST* be a pedophile.
> *nods*
You're the one slurping, you tell me.
>
> You know what they say about how it's always the person you *LEAST*
> suspect...yeah...10 to 1 says Bob and Carole are both into kiddy
> diddling and have quite the collection of child pornography on their
> computer...of course I'd be willin to bet that if they ever got caught
> they'd try and claim that it was for "research" to try and track down
> the *REAL* pedophiles...*snicker*...yeah, right.
Unsubstantiated hogwash.
>
> It really isn't that uncommon you know...for pedophiles to attack
> their own kind in an effort to attempt to pass themselves off as
> normal...Bob and Carole both fit pretty well into that category.
Why don't you just admit that you're jealous because you had
a fist shoved down your throat since you foolishly started trolling
here.
>> Bob's being used for his idiocy.
>Bob is a shrewd usenetizen. You should aspire to be as good.
Bob is a tool, and you're a nut (job) that's being worked on. Let us
all know how it works out for ya, Stumbles.
>> >> Not likely, because that might be considered as harassment;
>> >1. Nothing will happen. Nobody cares what happens to Pedophiles.
>> Bob is just as much of a pedophile as the alleged pedophiles he's
>> claimed to have outed.
>And how do you know this?
It makes sense, logically, I mean, if you were a pedophile...what
would be the best way of hiding that fact? Yup, by trying to mask
yourself as a "pedophile hunter". He's *SO* over the top about the
whole thing that it's so obviously bullshit. He's trying *WAY* too
hard.
>> >2. It would be impossible to find the persons in question since the
>> > UTB are perfectly cloaked
>> Famous last words. LOL
>I have been doing this for over 12 years myself. If I had any last
>words as you foolishly put it, I would have typed them long ago.
You've been doing *WHAT* exactly for over 12 years? Looking liak a
fumbling trainable and whining about ~evul~ pedophiles on teh
Interwebs? *snicker* Yer a cute kid...not really all that bright
though I'm afraid.
>Your ignorance is astounding.
Unfortunately for you your projection is not, it's all rather expected
I'm afraid.
>All that needs to be done is mail the information
>from the sex offender websites or whatever to neighbors, family or
>anybody you want to know.
...and why would they have any reason at all to believe that? You're
only 12 years old (and likely getting raped by Bob), so it's
understandable that you can't think like a grown up does. You see an
*ADULT* wouldn't turn on their family and friends at the drop of a
hat, nor would they believe any sort of bullshit you slopped together
and sent off in the mail. An *ADULT* knows just how easy it is to
pile together bullshit and make it look like it's real. Hells bells I
can make fauxpics look so fuckin real that people can't even tell
which is the original and which is the fake...
: http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Fauxpic_-_Is_This_Original.jpg
: http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Fauxpic_-_Or_Is_This_Original.jpg
Only children like yourself make such blind ASSumptions, an adult
would simply laugh off the letter, throw it away, and make a joke
about it to all their friends. They'd probably tease your target
about how they have an "Internet stalker" and crack jokes about how
you obviously don't have a life, obsessing over random strangers on
the fuckin Internet and trying to accuse them of being a pedophile.
An *ADULT* knows that if you actually had any *REAL*, *HARD EVIDENCE*
that they were a pedophile, that you would have contacted the FBI
about it...*NOT* them, ya fumbling idiot.
>> >You're frothing at the mouth again.
>> Oh what delicious irony.
>Again how do you know this?
Because I'm not a 12 year old like you.
>> Yeah *EVERYBODY* who doesn't slurp Bob's ass *MUST* be a pedophile.
>> *nods*
>You're the one slurping, you tell me.
You see the way that children respond to criticism and attacks with
IKY lames. This child is all liak, "NO, YOU!"
LOL
He really ought to post his home address so I can send his idiot
parents a bill for my online babysitting services...of course then Bob
would know his address too and he might run on over to try and rape
the poor kid, so I guess I shouldn't ask.
>> You know what they say about how it's always the person you *LEAST*
>> suspect...yeah...10 to 1 says Bob and Carole are both into kiddy
>> diddling and have quite the collection of child pornography on their
>> computer...of course I'd be willin to bet that if they ever got caught
>> they'd try and claim that it was for "research" to try and track down
>> the *REAL* pedophiles...*snicker*...yeah, right.
>Unsubstantiated hogwash.
Oh the irony. Not that a *CHILD* liak yourself could be expected to
see it. *snicker*
>> It really isn't that uncommon you know...for pedophiles to attack
>> their own kind in an effort to attempt to pass themselves off as
>> normal...Bob and Carole both fit pretty well into that category.
>Why don't you just admit that you're jealous because you had
>a fist shoved down your throat since you foolishly started trolling
> here.
Cry some moar for me, Fumbles. ^__^
>x-no-archive:
>On Oct 22, 9:19�pm, Onideus Mad Hatter <use...@backwater-
>productions.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:35:29 -0700 (PDT), "Ace*"
>>
>> <avlasvery...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Bob's being used for his idiocy.
>> >Bob is a shrewd usenetizen. You should aspire to be as good.
>>
>> Bob is a tool, and you're a nut (job) that's being worked on. �Let us
>> all know how it works out for ya, Stumbles.
>
>I've go<WHACK>
I wonder why this pedophile idiot is always trying to explain and
justify himself...and to *ME* of all people. LOL, I'm so the fuck far
up in his lil head space I could probably start sellin *REAL ESTATE*!
Better clarify that a bit before he visits the filling station men's
room
and buys you a rubber.
DD