sarchasm
Sidiot
Isn't that too bad?
I'm here and I post what I want
and I don't read your garbage
and anyone who takes you seriously
is no one I care to talk to.
I win. You lose.
One would think you would get tired
of kissing my ass.
But then, expecting you to behave like
a sane person is obviously a waste of time.
I'm here, loser. Laughing at you.
Sid
--
Sidney Lambe
Wiccan Priest and Apprentice Magician
http://tinyurl.com/7vs9zb
usenet4444 (at) gmail (dot) com
Sizzle Flambé
appear genuine:
> Newsgroups: alt.religion.wicca
> From: Sidiot <sidne...@nospam.invalid>
> Subject: sarchasm
> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: $$-gwhjl$non2s.news.x-privat.org
> Message-ID: <49fa...@news.x-privat.org>
> Date: 1 May 2009 02:14:01 +0100
> Organization: X-Privat.Org NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org
> Lines: 25
> X-Authenticated-User: $$y711z5apkf73od7n$mxc
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@x-privat.org
> Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!x-privat.org!not-for-mail
Here for comparison is a previous post from "Evergreen":
> Newsgroups: alt.religion.wicca
> From: Evergreen <sidne...@nospam.invalid>
> Subject: Re: My View of the Goddess
> References: <7739d001-2162-4ca2...@i28g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1c4e6447-3327-40e8...@t36g2000prt.googlegroups.com>
> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux)
> NNTP-Posting-Host: $$-gwhjl$non2s.news.x-privat.org
> Message-ID: <49f9...@news.x-privat.org>
> Date: 30 Apr 2009 20:18:03 +0100
> Organization: X-Privat.Org NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org
> Lines: 44
> X-Authenticated-User: $$y711z5apkf73od7n$mxc
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@x-privat.org
> Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!x-privat.org!not-for-mail
Ren
> I win. You lose.
But you can't seem to win Kook of the Month.
sarchasm
>
>I guess you don't like me.
>
It's more unlikely that I don't know who sidiot is and therefore, dislike or
like is irrelevant.
>
> Isn't that too bad?
>
Not even if it were relevant.
>
> I'm here and I post what I want
> and I don't read your garbage
>
Sure thing; that's why sidiot posted as "Sidiot" to start this thread.
Next, it'll be disbeliefs as spells.
>
> and anyone who takes you seriously
> is no one I care to talk to.
>
And yet, sidiot posts a thread entitled, "sarchasm" thus providing even more
evidence to support the conclusion that sidiot is a liar.
>
> I win. You lose.
>
No. Declaring some sort of hollow pyrrhic does not constitute a "win",
especially since sidiot constantly refuses to defend his weak positions.
>
> One would think you would get tired
> of kissing my ass.
>
Much to sidiot's apparent disappointment in regards to his sexual fantasies,
the only lips touching asses are sidiot's and his alleged "teacher".
>
> But then, expecting you to behave like
> a sane person is obviously a waste of time.
>
It remains a matter of speculation as to what sidiot fears; it may be that
he fears for his own sanity - and rightly so.
>
> I'm here, loser. Laughing at you.
> Sid
>
As sidiot pointed out to himself, "I don't read your garbage" and while he
begs to be outflanked and decimated by posting this thread as authored by
"Sidiot".
sarchasm
dishonor. I wonder who came up with it? ;-]
Pete (aka: Farts In Circles)
Oh, don't you worry. Sid is WELL on his way to total loss of coherence
as evidenced by his own responses to his own posts! SCHIZOID PARANOIA,
here we GO!
I wonder how it will end? Will he be institutionalized, or will he off
himself before he can be committed and thus prevented fromn harming
himself?
Let's just hope when his weak little mind goes "boom-boom" he won't
take out anyone else with him.
sarchasm
> > "Sidiot" <sidneyla...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
> >I guess
>
>
>I wonder how it will end?
>
Not well, for sidiot and mostly by his own doing.
>
>Will he be institutionalized, or will he off
>himself before he can be committed and thus prevented fromn harming
>himself?
>
He has already posted about being able to get internet access from prison
but, sidiot hasn't mentioned access from mental institutions yet.
>
>Let's just hope when his weak little mind goes "boom-boom" he won't
>take out anyone else with him.
>
Maybe sidiot can click his ruby slippers together while chanting his
'there's no place like the home' affirmational belief three times.
Sizzle Flambé
Sid chose, and I emphasize *chose*,
the persona of "Sidney Lambe",
and now he has freely chosen
to adopt the 'nym bestowed upon him
of "Sidiot".
Anagram for Sidney Lambe!
Anagram for Sidney Lambe!
and the envelope when opened
contains the terse and sinister:
"Ye Sin, Bedlam"!
Yet the glass door marked "SIDIOT"
is no more comforting, for once through,
you see that it was marked "TOI DIS",
or "Thou City of Sin and Chaos in Hell".
If name is character and destiny,
here is an unpleasant road map.
sarchasm
>
> Odd thing about names...
>
> Sid chose, and I emphasize *chose*,
> the persona of "Sidney Lambe",
> and now he has freely chosen
> to adopt the 'nym bestowed upon him
> of "Sidiot".
>
Although "sidney" will no doubt claim the choice was free,
with a compulsive jerk of his knee,
sidiot reveals to me,
what will be,
will be,
see?
Pete (aka: Farts In Circles)
sarchasm
> > "Sizzle Flamb�" <sizzle.fla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Odd thing about names...
>
> > Sid chose, and I emphasize *chose*,
> > the persona of "Sidney Lambe",
> > and now he has freely chosen
> > to adopt the 'nym bestowed upon him
> > of "Sidiot".
>
> Although "sidney" will no doubt claim the choice was free,
> with a compulsive jerk of his knee,
> sidiot reveals to me,
> what will be,
> will be,
> see?
>
>So Mote It Be!
>
In the instance of sidiot, you spelled "moat" incorrectly. ;>
Pete (aka: Farts In Circles)
> "Pete (aka: Farts In Circles)" <lordtrac...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "sarchasm" <sar.ch...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Odd thing about names...
>
> > > Sid chose, and I emphasize *chose*,
> > > the persona of "Sidney Lambe",
> > > and now he has freely chosen
> > > to adopt the 'nym bestowed upon him
> > > of "Sidiot".
>
> > Although "sidney" will no doubt claim the choice was free,
> > with a compulsive jerk of his knee,
> > sidiot reveals to me,
> > what will be,
> > will be,
> > see?
>
> >So Mote It Be!
>
> In the instance of sidiot, you spelled "moat" incorrectly. ;>
LOL!
RrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrIGHT!