Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

I like BRENDA

0 views
Skip to first unread message

gurdjieff 0f gormorrah

unread,
Mar 6, 2003, 3:18:35 AM3/6/03
to
I TRUELY DO....
I happen to find her highly off the wall,
way off base....
and kinda all squeezable like a tube
of che3ze whiz. I invision working her legs like some
wealth hungry prospector during the "rush" days in Alaska [while on
dextroamphetamine] .....while I be panning for gold.
Sweets, if ya be a reading this, my words don't come no sweeter.
ya know, what Jack London said? buck rhymes with fu*k.
why don't we do it in the roa....... er er.... yellow snow?
I could make your world so peaceful and calm
make you cry uncle 'till the cows cum home
or homo

jusk think, you could call me all kind of nasty names
( except for Tyrone....)
and feel the vib vib vibrations of my violet wand
and honey, GG won't get too upset if he finds your
'lil thieving hands in the cookie jar.

**batts big brown eyes**

GG


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 6, 2003, 2:12:16 PM3/6/03
to
>
> I like BRENDA

***gosh!
Brenda

kate

unread,
Mar 7, 2003, 11:42:27 AM3/7/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

Oh gosh, golly gee!
Why not invite This one
Over for tea?


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 7, 2003, 1:59:08 PM3/7/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:42:27 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[7] news:3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "gurdjieff 0f gormorrah" <jamf...@comcast.net>
>> > Reply to: [1] "gurdjieff 0f gormorrah"
>> > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:18:35 -0600
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>

>Oh gosh, golly gee!


>Why not invite This one
>Over for tea?

***cuz he wants sex ..and I already have a boyfriend.
Do I have to invite every guy that comes on to me ...to have...uhm..tea?
heh.
Brenda

ren

unread,
Mar 7, 2003, 2:42:57 PM3/7/03
to

>Do I have to invite every guy that comes on to me
>heh.
>Brenda

I don't know. Do they need an invitation?

kate

unread,
Mar 7, 2003, 10:48:58 PM3/7/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e68...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

Only drunken poets and men wanting to start their own little cults. Other
than that, your will is yours. You've invited a few to tea and I've warned
you about that. See Brenda? This is what you get for your cunt magic and
shit. And no, I'm not 'unsexual' or against meeting ppl, I'm just very
selective who those ppl are. From all outward appearances, you aren't. I'm
sure this isn't the last offer you'll get for your stupidity and naiveté.

kate


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 12:23:00 AM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:48:58 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e68...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[7] news:3e68...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:42:27 -0800
>> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:
>> > [6] <3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> >
>> >
>> >"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>> >[7] [8] news:3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >> >
>> >> > I like BRENDA
>> >> >
>> >> > From: "gurdjieff 0f gormorrah" <jamf...@comcast.net>
>> >> > Reply to: [1] "gurdjieff 0f gormorrah"
>> >> > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:18:35 -0600
>> >> > Newsgroups:
>> >> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> >> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> >> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> >> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> >
>>
>> >Oh gosh, golly gee!
>> >Why not invite This one
>> >Over for tea?
>>
>> ***cuz he wants sex ..and I already have a boyfriend.
>> Do I have to invite every guy that comes on to me ...to have...uhm..tea?
>> heh.
>> Brenda
>
>Only drunken poets and men wanting to start their own little cults. Other
>than that, your will is yours. You've invited a few to tea and I've warned
>you about that. See Brenda? This is what you get for your cunt magic and
>shit. And no, I'm not 'unsexual' or against meeting ppl, I'm just very
>selective who those ppl are. From all outward appearances, you aren't. I'm
>sure this isn't the last offer you'll get for your stupidity and naiveté.
>
>kate

***see Brenda? what the hell are you talking about? Cunt magic was Will's
thread m'dearie...and I am as selective as I want to be about who I
want..whether it be for a boyfriend ..or just a fuck. Stupidity? naivete?
I don't care if I get offers...it makes me laugh. Men don't frighten me
sexually.

Brenda

headkase

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 3:26:45 AM3/8/03
to
wt...@victoria.tc.ca (Brenda G. Kent) wrote in
news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca:

Men don't
> frighten me sexually.
>
> Brenda
>

me neither but they scare the fuck out of me emotionally.


headkase

Jani

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 8:15:22 AM3/8/03
to
You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out of
you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?

Jani


"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 3:25:40 PM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:15:22 GMT
> Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
>drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out of
>you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
>
>Jani
>
>

****uh..first off...I never asked her to "help" me. Secondly I don't
consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially when
that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth. Does
it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers" and
that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken? Does it ever occur to you
that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?
Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same double
standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have. What ever cult you are
speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my little
finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body. I
think I am wonderful...not better but wonderful as I think everyone
is...and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be
proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the streets.
Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the streets
or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality police.
I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.
Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.

Brenda

Ironywaves

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 7:17:35 PM3/8/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e68...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

Sometimes tea is just tea. Why not have a guy for tea?


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 9:06:31 PM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: "Ironywaves" <irony...@knology.net>
> Reply to: [1] "Ironywaves"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:17:35 -0500
> Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e68...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>


>Sometimes tea is just tea. Why not have a guy for tea?

****how long does he steep in the pot before you drink him?
:)
Brenda.

kate

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 9:13:46 PM3/8/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:15:22 GMT
> > Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> >
> >You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> >drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out
of
> >you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
> >
> >Jani
> >
> >
>
> ****uh..first off...I never asked her to "help" me.

Nightwish told you she didn't need or want your 'help' either Brenda. What
did you do? Kept on and on until you were blue in the face. You're an
embarrassement.


Secondly I don't
> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially when
> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth. Does
> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers" and
> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken?


It's perfectly obvious you're no innocent. Just a slut.


Does it ever occur to you
> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?

Who's your boyfriend? Pashta? Or maybe one of your 'students'?


> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same double
> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have.

Fellow woman? You? *mwhahahahhahahahahahahaha!* Sounds like you're angry
here Miss Love and Light.


What ever cult you are
> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my little
> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body.

> I
> think I am wonderful...not better

Not better? Your above statement says otherwise. You keep doing this over
and over Brenda, you condescending slut.


but wonderful as I think everyone
> is...

Lying sack of shit.

and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be
> proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
> experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the streets.

No. Women on the streets have their reasons for being there. Sex is
something we keep mostly to ourselves, we don't advertise how great we are
at it. You do. Eh, it's simple Brenda, if you advertise, some day some
lurker's going to show up at your door. You ain't any harder to find than
anyone else.

> Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the streets
> or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality police.

Hmmm.......haven't worked with prostitutes, but have worked for battered
women and children. Who do you think is more important smart-ass, children
with bruises all over their bodies, or a woman that's made a choice to make
a living from her body? FWIW, I support legalized prostitution.

> I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.

See? That's the defining point in this whole post. "You need sex......and in
a hurry". *haha*

> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.

Your dark side is all I've seen. Learn from That, slut. Jani isn't learning
a blessed thing from you except contempt for such as yourself. Neither am I,
though I keep trying to help you grow up. I'm done with that, but hope I
don't end up reading about you in the newspapers. Go ahead and lord it over
all of us Brenda. Like I said, your day is coming. You feel much too secure
hiding behind that computer of yours. Have a drink, smoke a joint, calm
down. Maybe go for a walk. Gods, what a bitch you are.

kate

kate

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 9:16:23 PM3/8/03
to

"headkase" <psykoexg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254...

Well..........that's a whole other subject right there. I think Brenda would
agree with you. That's a serious subject headcase. *sigh*

kate
>


kate

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 9:18:13 PM3/8/03
to

"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...

> You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out
of
> you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?

She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her find
out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.

kate

kate

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 9:41:47 PM3/8/03
to

<Lilly> wrote in message news:2suh6v8d9eilip4ik...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:42:27 -0800, "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Oh gosh, golly gee!
> >Why not invite This one
> >Over for tea?
>
>
> Somehow I don't think they'd be having tea, though. Blanda's so elated
> about her privates, who knows what the hell would go on there?

Into the news more'n likely. ;p I don't care anymore. A little ditty sure
got the slut wound up, didn't it? *g

k~

> ~L
>
> I've watched you change
> I took you home
> Set you on the glass
> I pulled off your wings
> Then I laughed
>
> ~Deftones~


Nightwish

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 10:47:34 PM3/8/03
to

"kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b4e8ab$1uj0uq$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de...

>
> "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> > You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> > drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out
> of
> > you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
>
> She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her
find
> out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.

What I especially found amusing was how she was bitching about you
supposedly doing to her what she did to me. She bitched and complained that
you were trying to teach her something she didn't want to learn. What the
hell was she doing with me on my herbs thread?

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:24:46 PM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:13:46 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[6] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >

>> > From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
>> > Reply to: [1] "Jani"
>> > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:15:22 GMT
>> > Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:
>> > [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> >
>> >You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
>> >drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out
>of
>> >you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
>> >
>> >Jani
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ****uh..first off...I never asked her to "help" me.
>
>Nightwish told you she didn't need or want your 'help' either Brenda. What
>did you do? Kept on and on until you were blue in the face. You're an
>embarrassement.

***actually she asked everyone for help..then afterwards said that she did
not want mine particularly as befitting the schoolyard gang. Not an
embarrassment at all...I'm not embarrassed and if you are ...well then?

>
>
> Secondly I don't
>> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially when
>> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
>> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth. Does
>> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers" and
>> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken?
>
>
>It's perfectly obvious you're no innocent. Just a slut.
>
>

*****what's a slut katie?


> Does it ever occur to you
>> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?
>
>Who's your boyfriend? Pashta? Or maybe one of your 'students'?
>

***you need to get a life dearie....

>
>> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
>> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same double
>> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have.
>
>Fellow woman? You? *mwhahahahhahahahahahahaha!* Sounds like you're angry
>here Miss Love and Light.
>

***sounds like it..but actually I was giggling all the way through
it.


>
> What ever cult you are
>> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my little
>> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body.
>
>> I
>> think I am wonderful...not better
>
>Not better? Your above statement says otherwise. You keep doing this over
>and over Brenda, you condescending slut.
>
>

****No...it says possibly know or have...learn to read.


> but wonderful as I think everyone
>> is...
>
>Lying sack of shit.
>

***no not lying....not like you are doing calling me a slut.

>and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be
>> proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
>> experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the streets.
>
>No. Women on the streets have their reasons for being there. Sex is
>something we keep mostly to ourselves, we don't advertise how great we are
>at it. You do. Eh, it's simple Brenda, if you advertise, some day some
>lurker's going to show up at your door. You ain't any harder to find than
>anyone else.
>

****I never advertised how great I was at it either katie....you sure read
a lot into saying that I like my cunt. Katie..if you don't advertise a
person could show up at your door..what's your point?


>> Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the streets
>> or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality police.
>
>Hmmm.......haven't worked with prostitutes, but have worked for battered
>women and children. Who do you think is more important smart-ass, children
>with bruises all over their bodies, or a woman that's made a choice to make
>a living from her body? FWIW, I support legalized prostitution.
>

****the children and the woman argument does not have anything to do with
this conversation for one..and if you support legalized prostitution then
do you also believe in calling them sluts and judgementalizing all over
them too? Goodness you have one face for people who don't sell sex or have
sex with everyone they meet and then one for prostitutes.


>> I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.
>
>See? That's the defining point in this whole post. "You need sex......and in
>a hurry". *haha*
>

***yes it is defining.


>> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.
>
>Your dark side is all I've seen. Learn from That, slut. Jani isn't learning

****ah..no...not slut..follow Jani and call me a slitch or lie more about
my sexual habits or how I interact with people.
You have not in the least seen my dark side.


>a blessed thing from you except contempt for such as yourself. Neither am I,
>though I keep trying to help you grow up. I'm done with that, but hope I
>don't end up reading about you in the newspapers. Go ahead and lord it over
>all of us Brenda. Like I said, your day is coming. You feel much too secure
>hiding behind that computer of yours. Have a drink, smoke a joint, calm
>down. Maybe go for a walk. Gods, what a bitch you are.
>

****help me grow up? how amazingly condescending you are Katie...you don't
even see it yourself. Lord what over? that I like my parts? get a grip
woman you are an emotional basketcase. Hiding? no....I hide not at
all..this is me...not afraid to be loving..not afraid to learn..not hiding
behind insults or lies....just me. Drink? don't drink much...smoke a
joint? when boyfriend visits perhaps. Go for a walk? it's finally snowing
here and with all the exercise I do everyday I need a day off. Bitch? like
Diana the bitch goddess? or Cast Iron Bitchie? Nah....some times but not
often. Now I hope you have settled down and have an interesting evening.


>kate

with love,
Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:26:18 PM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:16:23 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [7] <Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254>

>
>
>"headkase" <psykoexg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>[8] news:Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254...

>> wt...@victoria.tc.ca (Brenda G. Kent) wrote in
>> [9] news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca:

>>
>> Men don't
>> > frighten me sexually.
>> >
>> > Brenda
>> >
>>
>> me neither but they scare the fuck out of me emotionally.
>>
>>
>> headkase
>
>Well..........that's a whole other subject right there. I think Brenda would
>agree with you. That's a serious subject headcase. *sigh*
>
>kate
>>

***They don't scare me emotionally...sometimes I feel let down or sad
...but not fear really.
Brenda

Nightwish

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:32:22 PM3/8/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

It had nothing to do with the 'schoolyard gang' as you call them. I didn't
want your help in particular because... IT WASN'T HELP. All you did was pose
more questions, offering no information whatsoever. You only further
confused the issue. That isn't helpful, that's hindering.

>
> >
> >
> > Secondly I don't
> >> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially
when
> >> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
> >> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth.
Does
> >> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers"
and
> >> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken?
> >
> >
> >It's perfectly obvious you're no innocent. Just a slut.
> >
> >
>
> *****what's a slut katie?
>

You, apparently.

>
> > Does it ever occur to you
> >> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?
> >
> >Who's your boyfriend? Pashta? Or maybe one of your 'students'?
> >
>
> ***you need to get a life dearie....

So do you.

>
> >
> >> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
> >> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same
double
> >> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have.
> >
> >Fellow woman? You? *mwhahahahhahahahahahahaha!* Sounds like you're angry
> >here Miss Love and Light.
> >
>
> ***sounds like it..but actually I was giggling all the way through
> it.

Ah yes... the laughter of the hysterical. Not surprising.

>
>
> >
> > What ever cult you are
> >> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my
little
> >> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body.
> >
> >> I
> >> think I am wonderful...not better
> >
> >Not better? Your above statement says otherwise. You keep doing this over
> >and over Brenda, you condescending slut.
> >
> >
> ****No...it says possibly know or have...learn to read.

Take your own advice.

>
>
> > but wonderful as I think everyone
> >> is...
> >
> >Lying sack of shit.
> >
> ***no not lying....not like you are doing calling me a slut.

You lie constantly. In fact, SAYING you don't lie is a lie in and of itself.
Good job.

That you are extremely condescending. That and what's the matter with
celebacy? It prevents unwanted pregnancy, as well as STDs. Why would you
encourage someone to do something they don't feel is right for them? Oh
that's right.... because you're Brenda. I find it harder and harder not to
give in to the urge to call you a 'slitch', because it really is QUITE
fitting, you know?

>
>
> >> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.
> >
> >Your dark side is all I've seen. Learn from That, slut. Jani isn't
learning
>
> ****ah..no...not slut..follow Jani and call me a slitch or lie more about
> my sexual habits or how I interact with people.
> You have not in the least seen my dark side.

So it only gets worse from here, then? That's almost a scary thought. I
sincerely hope you never procreate, because that would just be cruel to the
innocent child. Please don't procreate, Brenda, I would prefer to thin out
the herd, so to speak.

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:35:49 PM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:18:13 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net>

>
>
>"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>[7] news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>> You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
>> drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out
>of
>> you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
>
>She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her find
>out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.
>

****I have had lots of shit in my life katie and Jani and learned from
it..however..I don't prejudice myself against all men. I don't think
talking about sex is asking for rape (that is what some people say..you
asked for it). I have had lots of conversations with women and men both
straight and bent about sex. If a guy gets the wrong idea...he learns
quickly that he was wrong. I am not paranoid...or particularly worried
besides the normal worries of day to day living. I have met mostly nice
and wonderful men in my life and some dix. I don't believe that I have to
act the old school marm virgin to keep men off me nor do I blame other
women who show that they are sexual beings for anything that may happen to
them. There are a lot of female witches that have had past problems with
men and have gotten attitudes because of it. I hope to never get those
attitudes ..as protective as you may believe that attitudes are..they are
falsely protective. You can have a whole load of women covered from head
to toe in veils and not speaking at all to men, raped and stalked by
same men. You do what you have to do..you keep strong..you keep your wits
about you...you listen to your gut and you live your life. I'm not about
to have to change my whole personality on the *chance*that some guy might
get the wrong idea. You may want to live your life this way..and if you
have been hurt...I can empathize and understand where you are coming
from..but I will NOT join you. My dad was a good man...there are lots of
good men out there.

>kate
>>
>> Jani
>>
Brenda

Nightwish

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:36:56 PM3/8/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >

Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to discover that
they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:38:13 PM3/8/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:41:47 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [7] <b4ai7m$1sfu09$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de>
> [8] <2suh6v8d9eilip4ik...@4ax.com>
>
>
><Lilly> wrote in message [9] news:2suh6v8d9eilip4ik...@4ax.com...

>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:42:27 -0800, "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Oh gosh, golly gee!
>> >Why not invite This one
>> >Over for tea?
>>
>>
>> Somehow I don't think they'd be having tea, though. Blanda's so elated
>> about her privates, who knows what the hell would go on there?
>
>Into the news more'n likely. ;p I don't care anymore. A little ditty sure
>got the slut wound up, didn't it? *g
>
>k~


***now how could a slut be wound up? aren't we all loose katie?
what ditty?
Brenda

Nightwish

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:41:47 PM3/8/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >

Condescending AND presumptuous... what a lovely package that presents.
Brenda, you'd be a prize for any man. (One of those 'Participant' ribbons
you get because you didn't actually WIN, someone just felt bad for you...)

>
> >kate
> >>
> >> Jani
> >>
> Brenda


Nightwish

unread,
Mar 8, 2003, 11:42:52 PM3/8/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >

Sluts have feelings too, Brenda, you should know that. Just because they're
loose doesn't mean they can't get their noses all bent out of shape about
something.


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 12:39:51 AM3/9/03
to

"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:fCzaa.2423$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

Brenda, I was talking about the way you talk on Usenet *d'ur* Do what you
damned well please. I could give a shit if you get hit by a damned truck at
this point.
>
> >
> > >kate
> > >>
> > >> Jani
> > >>
> > Brenda
>
>


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 12:52:19 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >

You're telling the world how much you love sex and you don't know a slut
gets wound up???????? Dumb ass. *lol*


aren't we all loose katie?


At the right times, "bren". At the right times.

> what ditty?

I'm going to keep writing those, seein' as you like them so much. ;)

> Brenda


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 12:54:39 AM3/9/03
to

"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

Why is it that you rarely answer a man here then? Except for those adoring
posts to your drunken poet, you rarely do. Could it be....fear?

kate

> > Brenda
>
> Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to discover
that
> they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.

NW
>
>


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:13:42 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:39:51 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <fCzaa.2423$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>
>

>> Condescending AND presumptuous... what a lovely package that presents.
>> Brenda, you'd be a prize for any man. (One of those 'Participant' ribbons
>> you get because you didn't actually WIN, someone just felt bad for you...)
>

****yes...how odd...I presume that there is good men out there...how odd.

>Brenda, I was talking about the way you talk on Usenet *d'ur* Do what you
>damned well please. I could give a shit if you get hit by a damned truck at
>this point.

***nothing wrong with the way I talk on usenet.. and isn't it
judgemental the way you judge my way of talking?..'least I don't try to
hurt others and go about insulting constantly. I would care if you got hit
by a truck katie therein lies the difference twixt you and me I reckon.

Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:30:03 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:52:19 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[7] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:41:47 -0800
>> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:
>> > [6] <3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> > [7] <b4ai7m$1sfu09$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de>
>> > [8] <2suh6v8d9eilip4ik...@4ax.com>
>> >
>> >
>> ><Lilly> wrote in message [9]
>[8] news:2suh6v8d9eilip4ik...@4ax.com...

>> >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:42:27 -0800, "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> >Oh gosh, golly gee!
>> >> >Why not invite This one
>> >> >Over for tea?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Somehow I don't think they'd be having tea, though. Blanda's so elated
>> >> about her privates, who knows what the hell would go on there?
>> >
>> >Into the news more'n likely. ;p I don't care anymore. A little ditty sure
>> >got the slut wound up, didn't it? *g
>> >
>> >k~
>>
>>
>> ***now how could a slut be wound up?
>
>You're telling the world how much you love sex and you don't know a slut
>gets wound up???????? Dumb ass. *lol*

****no...not a slut...whatever that is... Do non-sluts hate sex katie?
tell me your experiences.
kisses ..
Brenda

>
>
>aren't we all loose katie?
>
>
>At the right times, "bren". At the right times.
>

*****alone?


>> what ditty?
>
>I'm going to keep writing those, seein' as you like them so much. ;)
>

***seeing as I don't see them....keep on m'dear.

>> Brenda

**Brenda who loves katie.

kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:29:10 AM3/9/03
to

"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:qtzaa.2419$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

I fully realize you aren't embarrassed by your behaviour. That's what amazes
me. You go on about the schoolyard gang and don't notice how many ppl feel
the same way I do about you? *sigh*


>
> It had nothing to do with the 'schoolyard gang' as you call them. I didn't
> want your help in particular because... IT WASN'T HELP. All you did was
pose
> more questions, offering no information whatsoever. You only further
> confused the issue. That isn't helpful, that's hindering.

You got that right Nightwish!


>
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Secondly I don't
> > >> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially
> when
> > >> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
> > >> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth.
> Does
> > >> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual
"takers"
> and
> > >> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken?
> > >
> > >
> > >It's perfectly obvious you're no innocent. Just a slut.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > *****what's a slut katie?
> >
>
> You, apparently.

Hel Nightwish, She doesn't understand. Just picks key words like google
does.


>
> >
> > > Does it ever occur to you
> > >> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?
> > >
> > >Who's your boyfriend? Pashta? Or maybe one of your 'students'?
> > >
> >
> > ***you need to get a life dearie....

Have one thanks. Glad it's not yours.
>
> So do you.

Yep, she needs to do something besides brag and 'sing at the well'.


>
> >
> > >
> > >> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
> > >> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same
> double
> > >> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have.
> > >
> > >Fellow woman? You? *mwhahahahhahahahahahahaha!* Sounds like you're
angry
> > >here Miss Love and Light.
> > >
> >
> > ***sounds like it..but actually I was giggling all the way through
> > it.

You seem to giggle a lot. Mad ppl do that ya know. You're one of those that
immediately writes what she feels. I can tell when you're angry or feel like
crying and you know it. *g


>
> Ah yes... the laughter of the hysterical. Not surprising.
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > > What ever cult you are
> > >> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my
> little
> > >> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body.
> > >
> > >> I
> > >> think I am wonderful...not better
> > >
> > >Not better? Your above statement says otherwise. You keep doing this
over
> > >and over Brenda, you condescending slut.
> > >
> > >
> > ****No...it says possibly know or have...learn to read.
>
> Take your own advice.

If she only would *lol* Not likely though. Her advice I have yet to see.
Orders maybe.Or "know or have". Maybe that's her stolen "opinion"? *spit


>
> >
> >
> > > but wonderful as I think everyone
> > >> is...
> > >
> > >Lying sack of shit.
> > >
> > ***no not lying....not like you are doing calling me a slut.
>
> You lie constantly. In fact, SAYING you don't lie is a lie in and of
itself.
> Good job.

Keeps proving it over and over again, doesn't she? She knows it. Enjoys it
even. It's the only thing she thinks she IS good at, and she's transparent
even at that.


>
> >
> >
> >
> > >and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be
> > >> proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
> > >> experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the
> streets.
> > >
> > >No. Women on the streets have their reasons for being there. Sex is
> > >something we keep mostly to ourselves, we don't advertise how great we
> are
> > >at it. You do. Eh, it's simple Brenda, if you advertise, some day some
> > >lurker's going to show up at your door. You ain't any harder to find
than
> > >anyone else.
> > >
> > ****I never advertised how great I was at it either katie....you sure
read
> > a lot into saying that I like my cunt.

>>Katie..if you don't advertise a
> > person could show up at your door..what's your point?

I said "..if you advertise" stupid. You may not like Who shows up. Get it
now? You probably don't care who shows up. Guess what? I don't either
anymore. More luck to ya.


> >
> >
> > >> Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the
> streets
> > >> or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality
police.
> > >
> > >Hmmm.......haven't worked with prostitutes, but have worked for
battered
> > >women and children. Who do you think is more important smart-ass,
> children
> > >with bruises all over their bodies, or a woman that's made a choice to
> make
> > >a living from her body? FWIW, I support legalized prostitution.
> > >
> >
> > ****the children and the woman argument does not have anything to do
with
> > this conversation for one..

Oh, but Brenda, it has everything to do with this conversation. You just
aren't capable of lucid conversation and linking subjects together.


>>and if you support legalized prostitution then
> > do you also believe in calling them sluts and judgementalizing all over
> > them too? Goodness you have one face for people who don't sell sex or
have
> > sex with everyone they meet and then one for prostitutes.

No, I'm calling You a slut Brenda, not some hard-working< maybe abused woman
on the street. Are you so insulated and spoiled you can't tell the
difference?


> >
> >
> > >> I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.
> > >
> > >See? That's the defining point in this whole post. "You need
sex......and
> in
> > >a hurry". *haha*
> > >
> >
> > ***yes it is defining.

It's all you seem to think about, so yes, it is defining. Also, it was a
Flame Brenda. So no more of the innocent eyes when you say you don't.


>
> That you are extremely condescending. That and what's the matter with
> celebacy? It prevents unwanted pregnancy, as well as STDs. Why would you
> encourage someone to do something they don't feel is right for them? Oh
> that's right.... because you're Brenda. I find it harder and harder not to
> give in to the urge to call you a 'slitch', because it really is QUITE
> fitting, you know?

Oh Nightwish, she thrives on being flamed. Use any word you like. Slitch is
a good one!


>
> >
> >
> > >> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.
> > >
> > >Your dark side is all I've seen. Learn from That, slut. Jani isn't
> learning
> >
> > ****ah..no...not slut..follow Jani and call me a slitch or lie more
about
> > my sexual habits or how I interact with people.
> > You have not in the least seen my dark side.

I see perfectly well how you 'interract with people'. Sadly, it's not a
pretty sight. I haven't in the least seen your dark side? Show me, I dare
you.


>
> So it only gets worse from here, then? That's almost a scary thought. I
> sincerely hope you never procreate, because that would just be cruel to
the
> innocent child. Please don't procreate, Brenda, I would prefer to thin out
> the herd, so to speak.

Good advice for the slitch..........oh.........in my opinion. *lol*


>
> >
> >
> > >a blessed thing from you except contempt for such as yourself. Neither
am
> I,
> > >though I keep trying to help you grow up. I'm done with that, but hope
I
> > >don't end up reading about you in the newspapers. Go ahead and lord it
> over
> > >all of us Brenda. Like I said, your day is coming. You feel much too
> secure
> > >hiding behind that computer of yours. Have a drink, smoke a joint, calm
> > >down. Maybe go for a walk. Gods, what a bitch you are.
> > >
> > ****help me grow up? how amazingly condescending you are Katie...you
don't
> > even see it yourself.

See what fer gawds sakes? I swear, please, make yourself a bit clearer
Blender. I can be condescending and a bitch. A slut too. But at least,
unlike you, I admit it once in awhile.

>> Lord what over? that I like my parts? get a grip
> > woman you are an emotional basketcase. Hiding? no....I hide not at
> > all..this is me...not afraid to be loving..not afraid to learn..not
hiding
> > behind insults or lies....just me.

Yep, just you. Like I said, I'm overjoyed I'm not you. You hide all the
time, especially behind that transparent veil of lies.

>> Drink? don't drink much...smoke a
> > joint? when boyfriend visits perhaps. Go for a walk? it's finally
snowing
> > here and with all the exercise I do everyday I need a day off. Bitch?
like
> > Diana the bitch goddess? or Cast Iron Bitchie? Nah....some times but not
> > often. Now I hope you have settled down and have an interesting evening.

Not nearly like Diana. Not like any Goddess you say you honour. You just
cover your insults and bitchyness with pretense is all. Rhy and I are at
least honest about the way we feel, unlike you. Did I already say you were a
liar and a deceitful slut?
>> >
> > with love,
Brenda


Keep it bitch.

kate


> > Brenda
>
>


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:30:52 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >

Must be a lonesome night for you. And it must be my night to satisfy that
need you have. hmm...


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:35:26 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:54:39 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [7] <Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>
>
>
>"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
>[8] news:Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

>>
>> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>> [9] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> > >
>> > > Re: I like BRENDA
>> > >
>> > > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:16:23 -0800
>> > > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > > Newsgroups:
>> > > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> > > References:
>> > > [6] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> > > [7] <Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >"headkase" <psykoexg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> > >[8] [10] news:Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254...

>> > >> wt...@victoria.tc.ca (Brenda G. Kent) wrote in
>> > >> [9] [11] news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca:

>> > >>
>> > >> Men don't
>> > >> > frighten me sexually.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Brenda
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >> me neither but they scare the fuck out of me emotionally.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> headkase
>> > >
>> > >Well..........that's a whole other subject right there. I think Brenda
>> would
>> > >agree with you. That's a serious subject headcase. *sigh*
>> > >
>> > >kate
>> > >>
>> >
>> > ***They don't scare me emotionally...sometimes I feel let down or sad
>> > ...but not fear really.
>
>Why is it that you rarely answer a man here then? Except for those adoring
>posts to your drunken poet, you rarely do. Could it be....fear?
>

***rarely answer a man? very few men post insults to me for one or lie
about me.....for another reason...more women then men post on this
newsgroup...another reason? I have yet to see a lot of interesting threads
period. I have answered a few men however...and insult very very very few
people over all.

Why do you continually post to me when I don't read every one? high hopes?


>kate
>
>> > Brenda
>>
>> Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to discover
>that
>> they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.
>

****Never had a guy leave me before I wake up so I don't know
what that is like actually...heh.....you just keep on lieing don't ya
sweetie. First
you say I am a
slut..then you say I don't answer men cuz I am a-feared of them...now you
say I sleep with everyone! heh...let me know when the pills wear off.
You need so much love katie.

>NW
>>
>>

Brenda

kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:37:07 AM3/9/03
to

"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:qPyaa.2409$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

>
> "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b4e8ab$1uj0uq$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de...
> >
> > "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> > > You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> > > drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect
out
> > of
> > > you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
> >
> > She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her
> find
> > out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.
>
> What I especially found amusing was how she was bitching about you
> supposedly doing to her what she did to me. She bitched and complained
that
> you were trying to teach her something she didn't want to learn. What the
> hell was she doing with me on my herbs thread?

I thought it was Our herbs thread? *pout*
She should have enough pride to back off when she's told to. Gads. This is
what she calls 'ravening' Nightwish. Just pushing her self and own values on
others. Not only is she lacking integrity and pride, she lacks what brains
she could've had if she'd only accepted them. Too late now *ha*

kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:47:33 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:39:51 -0800
> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> > [6] <fCzaa.2423$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>
> >
>
> >> Condescending AND presumptuous... what a lovely package that presents.
> >> Brenda, you'd be a prize for any man. (One of those 'Participant'
ribbons
> >> you get because you didn't actually WIN, someone just felt bad for
you...)
> >
>
> ****yes...how odd...I presume that there is good men out there...how odd.
>
> >Brenda, I was talking about the way you talk on Usenet *d'ur* Do what you
> >damned well please. I could give a shit if you get hit by a damned truck
at
> >this point.
>
> ***nothing wrong with the way I talk on usenet.. and isn't it
> judgemental the way you judge my way of talking?

No more judgemental than you telling a whole Culture how to behave. No more
judgemental than you are of all of us. Yes, I'm being judgemental. I gave
you more than a fair chance, you failed.

..'least I don't try to
> hurt others and go about insulting constantly. I would care if you got hit
> by a truck katie therein lies the difference twixt you and me I reckon.

I 'reckon' you could give a husky fuck about me getting hurt. You've hurt
others. Just because you can't hurt me, you put on with the love bit? Keep
it Brenda. I have almost too much love in my life already, don't need love
from someone like you. A long time ago, we could've had something of a
relationship, but the more I get to know you here, read your words, the less
likely that possibility is.

kate
>
> Brenda
>


Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 2:06:22 AM3/9/03
to
*chuckle* Another volley of bitching and spitting? You really should do
something about that anger, you know ... A little lesson for you, slitch.
The more you whore yourself out in public, and the more you show yourself up
telling everyone that you got laid, the more you demean yourself. You seem
to be totally ignorant of the idea that having self-respect, respect for
one's partner, and keeping private matters private is not repression. But
then, concepts like truth and integrity escape you completely, so it's
hardly surprising that you have no idea how to behave in public in other
respects.

Jani

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >

> > From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> > Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:15:22 GMT
> > Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)

> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:

> > [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>


> >
> >You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> >drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect out
of
> >you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
> >

> >Jani
> >
> >
>
> ****uh..first off...I never asked her to "help" me. Secondly I don't


> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially when
> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth. Does
> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers" and

> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken? Does it ever occur to you


> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?

> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same double

> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have. What ever cult you are


> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my little
> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body. I

> think I am wonderful...not better but wonderful as I think everyone
> is...and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be


> proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
> experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the streets.

> Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the streets
> or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality police.

> I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.

> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.
>

> Brenda
>


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 2:45:42 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

You're totally missing the msg here, as usual.


> tell me your experiences.

You go first. ;)3

> kisses ..
> Brenda

Givin' me kisses now? *har* I knew you liked me, but jeez!


>
> >
> >
> >aren't we all loose katie?
> >
> >
> >At the right times, "bren". At the right times.
> >
>
> *****alone?
>
>
> >> what ditty?
> >
> >I'm going to keep writing those, seein' as you like them so much. ;)
> >
>
> ***seeing as I don't see them....keep on m'dear.
>
> >> Brenda
>


*chuckle* You're sure some cheap entertainment sometimes.
>


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 2:50:41 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

You still just talk to the men that don't 'threaten' your precious ego in
some way. You Are an insult. It's amazing you're breathing.


>
> Why do you continually post to me when I don't read every one? high hopes?

Aww. You read my other post before this one. How sweet.


>
>
> >kate
> >
> >> > Brenda
> >>
> >> Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to discover
> >that
> >> they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.
> >
> ****Never had a guy leave me before I wake up so I don't know
> what that is like actually...heh.....you just keep on lieing don't ya
> sweetie. First
> you say I am a
> slut..then you say I don't answer men cuz I am a-feared of them...now you
> say I sleep with everyone! heh...let me know when the pills wear off.
> You need so much love katie.

*chuckle* You aren't answering me here dip. It's Nightwish too. Isn't this
fun NW?

kate
>
> >NW
> >>
> >>
>
> Brenda


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 2:59:53 AM3/9/03
to
Shhhhhhh Jani!! You don't seriously want her to LEARN anything, do ya? ;)

kate

"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message

news:OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 3:34:18 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:37:07 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net>
> [7] <b4e8ab$1uj0uq$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de>
> [8] <qPyaa.2409$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>

>
>
>"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
>[9] news:qPyaa.2409$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

>>
>> "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> [10] news:b4e8ab$1uj0uq$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de...

>> >
>> > "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > [11] news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>> > > You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
>> > > drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect
>out
>> > of
>> > > you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
>> >
>> > She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her
>> find
>> > out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.
>>
>> What I especially found amusing was how she was bitching about you
>> supposedly doing to her what she did to me. She bitched and complained
>that
>> you were trying to teach her something she didn't want to learn. What the
>> hell was she doing with me on my herbs thread?

**you asked all for help Nightwish..and I gave help..then you turned your
nose up at it (well the Socratic method anyway) and told me to stop
responding to *YOUR* posts..which I did. Ofcourse if someone else reposts
your stuff...well then...that's a different thing eh?

>
>I thought it was Our herbs thread? *pout*
>She should have enough pride to back off when she's told to. Gads. This is
>what she calls 'ravening' Nightwish. Just pushing her self and own values on
>others. Not only is she lacking integrity and pride, she lacks what brains
>she could've had if she'd only accepted them. Too late now *ha*
>>

***No this is not called ravening at all. She asked...I gave. If she
doesn't want me..she says so.
YOu say I don't have brains kate? well now that is troubling...
taken from you..that really means something.

>> >
>> > kate
>> > >

big old squishy hugs...
Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 3:44:34 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:47:33 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[6] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:39:51 -0800
>> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:


***never did katie....and if you understood you would realize that. I have
not once told any culture how to behave. I talk to people as
individual..not one mass as you tend to. A fair chance? you GAVE me?
giggle....
katie..you're scared...scared to like me because then you may have to try
and understand me and a few others may get angry at you. That about sums
it up. Anything or person that you don't understand...you are frightened
of.


>
>..'least I don't try to
>> hurt others and go about insulting constantly. I would care if you got hit
>> by a truck katie therein lies the difference twixt you and me I reckon.
>
>I 'reckon' you could give a husky fuck about me getting hurt. You've hurt
>others. Just because you can't hurt me, you put on with the love bit? Keep

***I have hurt no one. You are afraid of me and that is okay...but if
you'd let your ego go once in awhile you'd realize that I am a friend.


>it Brenda. I have almost too much love in my life already, don't need love
>from someone like you. A long time ago, we could've had something of a
>relationship, but the more I get to know you here, read your words, the less
>likely that possibility is.

****no one can have too much love. I would welcome love from you readily
and happily whether or not you let others know. I don't dream of it or
pain for it..but I know it is there and it will come of its own time.
We engage in one another for a time of learning...there is love there or
else there would be total avoidance.

>
>kate
>>
>> Brenda
>>

Blessings and love
Brenda

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 3:48:06 AM3/9/03
to

"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:qPyaa.2409$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

>
> "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b4e8ab$1uj0uq$1...@ID-140581.news.dfncis.de...
> >
> > "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> > > You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> > > drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect
out
> > of
> > > you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
> >
> > She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her
> find
> > out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.
>
> What I especially found amusing was how she was bitching about you
> supposedly doing to her what she did to me. She bitched and complained
that
> you were trying to teach her something she didn't want to learn. What the
> hell was she doing with me on my herbs thread?

Trouble is, slitch is so arrogant and condescending that she sees nothing
wrong with inflicting her misinformation on others, but flatly refuses to
acknowledge that *she* might benefit from advice from those who have more
experience and common sense, such as Kate.

Jani


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:01:49 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:45:42 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>
>
>> >You're telling the world how much you love sex and you don't know a slut
>> >gets wound up???????? Dumb ass. *lol*
>>
>> ****no...not a slut...whatever that is... Do non-sluts hate sex katie?
>
>You're totally missing the msg here, as usual.

***heh...you don't get it ..do you? LOL!

>
>> tell me your experiences.
>
>You go first. ;)3

***no I would not want to shock you too much.

>
>> kisses ..
>> Brenda
>
>Givin' me kisses now? *har* I knew you liked me, but jeez!
>>
>> >

****big wet ones...


>> >
>> >aren't we all loose katie?
>> >
>> >
>> >At the right times, "bren". At the right times.
>> >
>>
>> *****alone?
>>
>>
>> >> what ditty?
>> >
>> >I'm going to keep writing those, seein' as you like them so much. ;)
>> >
>>
>> ***seeing as I don't see them....keep on m'dear.
>>
>> >> Brenda
>>
>
>
>*chuckle* You're sure some cheap entertainment sometimes.
>>

****heh..and YOU think I don't get the msg! LOL!
well at least we entertain each other katie....the rest of the newsgroup
are probably retching...but we have fun...oh wait..you don't find me
hilarious as you said..but disgusting...or has that changed again?

Brenda

hy

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:03:35 AM3/9/03
to
Jani wrote:
>
> Trouble is, slitch is so arrogant and condescending that she sees nothing
> wrong with inflicting her misinformation on others, but flatly refuses to
> acknowledge that *she* might benefit from advice from those who have more
> experience and common sense, such as Kate.

Common sense that benefits one person, can hinder or hurt another.
Let her live her life, she seems to be doing fine.

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:11:15 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:50:41 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[7] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:54:39 -0800
>> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:
>> > [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> > [7] <Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>

>> >
>> >
>> >"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
>> >[8] [8] news:Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

>> >>
>> >> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>> >> [9] [9] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >> > >
>> >> > > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >> > >
>> >> > > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> >> > > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> >> > > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:16:23 -0800
>> >> > > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> >> > > Newsgroups:
>> >> > > [2] alt.pagan,
>> >> > > [3] alt.discordia,
>> >> > > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> >> > > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> >> > > References:
>> >> > > [6] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> >> > > [7] <Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254>
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >"headkase" <psykoexg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >> > >[8] [10] [10] news:Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254..

>.
>> >> > >> wt...@victoria.tc.ca (Brenda G. Kent) wrote in
>> >> > >> [9] [11] [11] news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca:

>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> Men don't
>> >> > >> > frighten me sexually.
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > Brenda
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> me neither but they scare the fuck out of me emotionally.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> headkase
>> >> > >
>> >> > >Well..........that's a whole other subject right there. I think
>Brenda
>> >> would
>> >> > >agree with you. That's a serious subject headcase. *sigh*
>> >> > >
>> >> > >kate
>> >> > >>
>> >> >
>> >> > ***They don't scare me emotionally...sometimes I feel let down or sad
>> >> > ...but not fear really.
>> >
>> >Why is it that you rarely answer a man here then? Except for those
>adoring
>> >posts to your drunken poet, you rarely do. Could it be....fear?
>> >
>>
>> ***rarely answer a man? very few men post insults to me for one or lie
>> about me.....for another reason...more women then men post on this
>> newsgroup...another reason? I have yet to see a lot of interesting threads
>> period. I have answered a few men however...and insult very very very few
>> people over all.
>
>You still just talk to the men that don't 'threaten' your precious ego in
>some way. You Are an insult. It's amazing you're breathing.


****?? what precious ego? I talk to whom I wish and whomever posts a topic
I am interested in. Now go and look and you will find the majority of the
posts are insults....rather boring for me really...so I wait for something
good...talk of Kabbalah....interesting but not my interests now. Speak of
quantum physics or time travel...worm holes and the like..speak of
shamanic travelling..speak of many things and I will talk. Now insult for
no reason...and I will probably wait till the person gets it out of their
system as insults and flames are a waste of energy but do have some
learning potential. I read Davids posts at times because I find him
interesting ...the wild man of the forest kind of thing...and Michael I
love as well. In Will I find a loyal friend and a talented poet. Take
Caliban...supposedly a guy..but he flames far too much...pompousity in
stick form up his ass. He may be a lovely man in reality but has too much
arrogance and ego for me to bother with right now. Parse makes me laugh!
Duane is fine and that new poster who has a bead on CIB I do like!

>>
>> Why do you continually post to me when I don't read every one? high hopes?
>
>Aww. You read my other post before this one. How sweet.
>>

***yes I did. Yes I am. :)

>>
>> >kate
>> >
>> >> > Brenda
>> >>
>> >> Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to discover
>> >that
>> >> they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.
>> >
>> ****Never had a guy leave me before I wake up so I don't know
>> what that is like actually...heh.....you just keep on lieing don't ya
>> sweetie. First
>> you say I am a
>> slut..then you say I don't answer men cuz I am a-feared of them...now you
>> say I sleep with everyone! heh...let me know when the pills wear off.
>> You need so much love katie.
>
>*chuckle* You aren't answering me here dip. It's Nightwish too. Isn't this
>fun NW?
>

***** well as long as we get the answers straight then I am fine.


>kate
>>

***huggles katie.
ps. take care with the young ones katie...you ARE an elder to Nightwish.

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:29:16 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> Reply to: [1] "kate"
> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:59:53 -0800
> Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net>

>
>Shhhhhhh Jani!! You don't seriously want her to LEARN anything, do ya? ;)
>
>kate

****no Jani would never teach anyone..that would be condescending.
Don't insult Jani, Kate.
With kate...the war is the thing..she tends to forget what she says one
minute to fight...kinda like a warrior forgetting where he puts his foot
only to find it in his ass later on.
Brenda

>
>
>
>"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>[7] news:OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...


>> *chuckle* Another volley of bitching and spitting? You really should do
>> something about that anger, you know ... A little lesson for you, slitch.
>> The more you whore yourself out in public, and the more you show yourself
>up
>

***my anger takes forever to come out actually. You have not seen my anger
really. Whore? slitch again? oh no....what judgementalism Jani sweets.


> telling everyone that you got laid, the more you demean yourself. You seem

****I think that at 41 if most people don't know that I have gotten laid
throughout my life ...then it would not come as a shock so much.


>> to be totally ignorant of the idea that having self-respect, respect for
>> one's partner, and keeping private matters private is not repression. But

***I respect myself immensely as I believe we all are God. I respect my
partner for the same reason. What partner did I talk about Jani? What do I
say about what I do besides one episode I talked about because it had to
do with Wills thread on cunt magick and using semen for magick? Did I
mention the person? did I give details about his penis or any tell-tale
tattoos? you're a hoot....


>> then, concepts like truth and integrity escape you completely, so it's
>> hardly surprising that you have no idea how to behave in public in other
>> respects.
>>

**** my dear....talking about sex is what many of us adults do sometimes.
There is nothing wrong with it and the fact that you have never talked
about sex to more than one person at a time is amazing to me. You HAVE had
sex right? you know how wonderful it is? then why without naming names is
it wrong to talk about it with other mainly adults? I have two friends who
are hmmmm what's the word? they don't have sex....anyone..one hates it and
does not want any mention (she is in her 30's and has not had sex ever)
and one is in her 50's (celebate! that's the word) and she loves talking
about sex. Most of the witches I know love talking about sex. A lot of the
lesbians don't for some reason but the Bisexuals and the heteros and the
'mos seem to..at least in my circles. I fit in perfectly....and we have
all had lovely conversations. So as far as not fitting in public or what
have you..you have a very narrow construct of what many people talk about.
Now as far as the judging me goes.....what you have said already does
nothing to me..so why do you think this will matter? I am learning some
things from you however...it is an interesting time. Perhaps I will get
into reading more of your posts in the future if I can wade through the
insults to find some learning and teaching.

Blessings dear Jani
Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:45:15 AM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: hy <hybi...@home.com>
> Reply to: [1] hybi...@shaw.ca
> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:03:35 GMT
> Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [9] <adDaa.19140$9d5.15...@news-text.cableinet.net>

>
>Jani wrote:
>>
>> Trouble is, slitch is so arrogant and condescending that she sees nothing
>> wrong with inflicting her misinformation on others, but flatly refuses to
>> acknowledge that *she* might benefit from advice from those who have more
>> experience and common sense, such as Kate.

****inflict? you have ears to here..you have buttons to press and you can
skip over posts dear Jani. Benefit from kate? ofcourse I do...as she does
me. What *more* experience does kate have?


>
>Common sense that benefits one person, can hinder or hurt another.
>Let her live her life, she seems to be doing fine.


***I figure that we engage in what we wish to to learn. Kate and Jani both
can just skip over my posts..but they need to try and teach..as I need to
teach and learn...it is just the way. No one forces anyone to look or
read...it is that trainwreck curiousity that snags us all I reckon. I have
at both times been called stupid,idiot,a bitch,a fluffy bunny,a non-pagan,
a non-Christian,slitch,loose,what-have-you and it rolls off my back and I
just keep on...posting and reading whom I wish and loving everyone. Adults
can even have tantrums...stamping their feet.. wondering why I don't leave
....and it is all about the ego...not magick..not energy..but the ego
bruised and battered. What will the others think of me? what will
the others say? how will I fit in with the pecking order? I created this
Brenda...oh excuse me..Bwenduh* construct in my head and I love it like
the child I created....please don't take my child away from me!
attachments to heavy heavy heavy weights...that pull you down....
Brenda has gone onwards..still loving..still caring and still learning and
teaching and you guys ...some of you...are stuck in a mire of your own
making ...yelling into a headwind.
Let's talk people..you got a topic? fire away...you got insults? leave'em
at the door for me to wipe my feet on.
Brenda the moron

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:56:13 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>

> >Nightwish told you she didn't need or want your 'help' either Brenda.
What
> >did you do? Kept on and on until you were blue in the face. You're an
> >embarrassement.
>
> ***actually she asked everyone for help..then afterwards said that she did
> not want mine particularly as befitting the schoolyard gang. Not an
> embarrassment at all...I'm not embarrassed and if you are ...well then?

You're a consistent embarrassment to Pagans who value integrity and
respect - namely, the ones you've lied about and insulted. However,
displaying your own ignorance and pretentiousness embarrasses no-one but
you. Nightwish told you to butt out because she wanted *practical advice,
not your futile attempts to present yourself as some sort of "teacher".

> > Secondly I don't
> >> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially
when
> >> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
> >> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth.
Does
> >> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers"
and
> >> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken?
> >
> >

> >It's perfectly obvious you're no innocent. Just a slut.
> >
> >
>
> *****what's a slut katie?
>
>

> > Does it ever occur to you
> >> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?
> >

> >Who's your boyfriend? Pashta? Or maybe one of your 'students'?
> >
>
> ***you need to get a life dearie....

She *has* a life, and a damn good one, too. Why she wastes her time trying
to help you out of the mire you've got yourself into is beyond me, except
that she's the kind of person who *does help, and *does teach, even if it's
obviously a lost cause.

> >
> >> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
> >> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same
double
> >> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have.
> >

> >Fellow woman? You? *mwhahahahhahahahahahahaha!* Sounds like you're angry
> >here Miss Love and Light.
> >
>
> ***sounds like it..but actually I was giggling all the way through
> it.

Really? There's something decidedly twisted about calling someone "bloody
repressed" and "sickening" while giggling like a vapid moron. To admit to
anger would at least have been honest - but then you don't do "honest", do
you, lying slitch?

> > What ever cult you are
> >> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my
little
> >> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body.
> >
> >> I
> >> think I am wonderful...not better
> >

> >Not better? Your above statement says otherwise. You keep doing this over
> >and over Brenda, you condescending slut.
> >
> >
> ****No...it says possibly know or have...learn to read.
>
>

> > but wonderful as I think everyone

> >> is...
> >
> >Lying sack of shit.
> >
> ***no not lying....not like you are doing calling me a slut.
>
>
>

> >and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be
> >> proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
> >> experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the
streets.
> >

> >No. Women on the streets have their reasons for being there. Sex is
> >something we keep mostly to ourselves, we don't advertise how great we
are
> >at it. You do. Eh, it's simple Brenda, if you advertise, some day some
> >lurker's going to show up at your door. You ain't any harder to find than
> >anyone else.
> >
> ****I never advertised how great I was at it either katie....you sure read
> a lot into saying that I like my cunt. Katie..if you don't advertise a
> person could show up at your door..what's your point?
>
>

> >> Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the
streets
> >> or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality police.
> >

> >Hmmm.......haven't worked with prostitutes, but have worked for battered
> >women and children. Who do you think is more important smart-ass,
children
> >with bruises all over their bodies, or a woman that's made a choice to
make
> >a living from her body? FWIW, I support legalized prostitution.
> >
>
> ****the children and the woman argument does not have anything to do with

> this conversation for one..and if you support legalized prostitution then


> do you also believe in calling them sluts and judgementalizing all over
> them too? Goodness you have one face for people who don't sell sex or have
> sex with everyone they meet and then one for prostitutes.

Prostitutes are professionals selling sex, advertise as such, and deserve
the same respect as anyone else in business. Amateurs who insist on
publicising private matters on Usenet merely display for all to see how
little they respect themselves, and their partners.

>
> >> I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.
> >

> >See? That's the defining point in this whole post. "You need sex......and
in
> >a hurry". *haha*
> >
>
> ***yes it is defining.

It shows that you consider that women who don't act like whores in public
are "repressed" and "need sex". What a strange and warped concept of
femininity and sexuality you have.
>

> >> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.
> >

> >Your dark side is all I've seen. Learn from That, slut. Jani isn't
learning
>
> ****ah..no...not slut..follow Jani and call me a slitch or lie more about
> my sexual habits or how I interact with people.
> You have not in the least seen my dark side.

Your sexual habits are displayed for all to see on the newsgroup, since you
insist on telling all and sundry about them.


>
>
> >a blessed thing from you except contempt for such as yourself. Neither am
I,
> >though I keep trying to help you grow up. I'm done with that, but hope I
> >don't end up reading about you in the newspapers. Go ahead and lord it
over
> >all of us Brenda. Like I said, your day is coming. You feel much too
secure
> >hiding behind that computer of yours. Have a drink, smoke a joint, calm
> >down. Maybe go for a walk. Gods, what a bitch you are.
> >

> ****help me grow up? how amazingly condescending you are Katie...you don't

> even see it yourself. Lord what over? that I like my parts? get a grip


> woman you are an emotional basketcase.

Kate has self-respect, common sense and integrity. Whereas your flailings
and mindless outpourings could well be described as the ramblings of an
"emotional basketcase".

Hiding? no....I hide not at
> all..this is me...not afraid to be loving..not afraid to learn..not hiding

> behind insults or lies....just me. Drink? don't drink much...smoke a


> joint? when boyfriend visits perhaps. Go for a walk? it's finally snowing
> here and with all the exercise I do everyday I need a day off. Bitch? like
> Diana the bitch goddess?

Diana was the goddess of the hunt, and also of chastity. A rather ironic
choice of deity for the likes of you, isn't it?

Jani

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 5:11:46 AM3/9/03
to
There's a HUGE middle ground between women who wear the bourkha and women
who shout about their genitalia on Usenet - a middle ground occupied by
sexually aware and fulfilled women with self-respect, self-esteem and
consideration for their partners. Not "school marm virgins", not people with
"attitudes", not "sickeningly repressed", just normal, healthy, emotionally
well-balanced women. A mindset which, unsurprisingly, seems to be totally
outside your comprehension.

Jani

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>

> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:18:13 -0800
> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org

> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [5] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> > [6] <K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net>
> >
> >

> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message

> >[7] news:K1maa.18500$f94.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...


> >> You idiot, Kate was trying to be helpful, and you respond with more
> >> drivellings about your whoring. Has the cult driven all self-respect
out
> >of
> >> you, as well as whatever integrity you might once have had?
> >
> >She doesn't recognise what kind of shit she's asking for Jani. Let her
find
> >out on her own. Maybe her 'god' or her 'priestess' will protect her.
> >
>

> ****I have had lots of shit in my life katie and Jani and learned from
> it..however..I don't prejudice myself against all men. I don't think
> talking about sex is asking for rape (that is what some people say..you
> asked for it). I have had lots of conversations with women and men both
> straight and bent about sex. If a guy gets the wrong idea...he learns
> quickly that he was wrong. I am not paranoid...or particularly worried
> besides the normal worries of day to day living. I have met mostly nice
> and wonderful men in my life and some dix. I don't believe that I have to
> act the old school marm virgin to keep men off me nor do I blame other
> women who show that they are sexual beings for anything that may happen to
> them. There are a lot of female witches that have had past problems with
> men and have gotten attitudes because of it. I hope to never get those
> attitudes ..as protective as you may believe that attitudes are..they are
> falsely protective. You can have a whole load of women covered from head
> to toe in veils and not speaking at all to men, raped and stalked by
> same men. You do what you have to do..you keep strong..you keep your wits
> about you...you listen to your gut and you live your life. I'm not about
> to have to change my whole personality on the *chance*that some guy might
> get the wrong idea. You may want to live your life this way..and if you
> have been hurt...I can empathize and understand where you are coming
> from..but I will NOT join you. My dad was a good man...there are lots of
> good men out there.
>

> >kate
> >>
> >> Jani
> >>
> Brenda


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 5:11:14 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:59:53 -0800
> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> > [6] <OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net>
> >
> >Shhhhhhh Jani!! You don't seriously want her to LEARN anything, do ya? ;)
> >
> >kate
>
> ****no Jani would never teach anyone..that would be condescending.
> Don't insult Jani, Kate.

You're the one that insults Jani's intelligence, not me. She teaches all the
time, you just don't take the time to read her posts, other than the ones to
you, Or.....you just find it incredibly difficult to learn yourself.


> With kate...the war is the thing..she tends to forget what she says one
> minute to fight...kinda like a warrior forgetting where he puts his foot
> only to find it in his ass later on.

I Never forget Brenda, and you're finding that out. The only one trippin'
here is you *lol* You asked for a 'war', well, now you have one. And I ~am~
willing to give you one. You and the rest of your kind.

> Brenda

Oh, there's more............read on............


>
> >
> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> >[7] news:OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> >> *chuckle* Another volley of bitching and spitting? You really should do
> >> something about that anger, you know ... A little lesson for you,
slitch.
> >> The more you whore yourself out in public, and the more you show
yourself
> >up
> >
>
> ***my anger takes forever to come out actually. You have not seen my anger
> really. Whore? slitch again? oh no....what judgementalism Jani sweets.

What darlin' names you have for us all. Mad Brenda? Showing part of that
'dark side' you keep telling me about? *chuckle*


>
>
> > telling everyone that you got laid, the more you demean yourself. You
seem

> > to be totally ignorant of the idea that having self-respect, respect for
> > one's partner, and keeping private matters private is not repression.
But

> > then, concepts like truth and integrity escape you completely, so it's
> > hardly surprising that you have no idea how to behave in public in other
> > respects.

Fixed that problem you have with posting so rudely Brenda. Splitting
sentences and those obnoxious headers, and you think We're rude! *pah*


> ****I think that at 41 if most people don't know that I have gotten laid
> throughout my life ...then it would not come as a shock so much.

Have you ever been laid Brenda? Is it story time yet? *g The 02:11 drunks
from the bar don't count. Anyone looks good to them.


>
> ***I respect myself immensely as I believe we all are God. I respect my
> partner for the same reason. What partner did I talk about Jani? What do I
> say about what I do besides one episode I talked about because it had to
> do with Wills thread on cunt magick and using semen for magick? Did I
> mention the person? did I give details about his penis or any tell-tale
> tattoos? you're a hoot....

If you really thought we were all god and you really did have any respect
for him, then you'd show a semblance of respect for yourself. Just more
hypocricy from Blenda. No big surprise there. You're a hoot.


>
>
> **** my dear....talking about sex is what many of us adults do sometimes.
> There is nothing wrong with it and the fact that you have never talked
> about sex to more than one person at a time is amazing to me.

This isn't even an issue stupid. Of course we all talk about sex. More of
that ribbon sticking out of your ass, better start pulling. You're amazed at
a lot of stuff, aren't ya? Like a deer in the headlights and about as smart
as a badger. {apologies to the deer and badgers here}


>You HAVE had
> sex right? you know how wonderful it is? then why without naming names is
> it wrong to talk about it with other mainly adults? I have two friends who
> are hmmmm what's the word? they don't have sex....anyone..one hates it and
> does not want any mention (she is in her 30's and has not had sex ever)
> and one is in her 50's (celebate! that's the word) and she loves talking
> about sex. Most of the witches I know love talking about sex. A lot of the
> lesbians don't for some reason but the Bisexuals and the heteros and the
> 'mos seem to..at least in my circles. I fit in perfectly....and we have
> all had lovely conversations. So as far as not fitting in public or what
> have you..you have a very narrow construct of what many people talk about.


Naw, in my case, I just hate listening to YOU talk about it. You have a very
nasty way about you, know that? Now you do.


> Now as far as the judging me goes.....what you have said already does
> nothing to me..so why do you think this will matter? I am learning some
> things from you however...it is an interesting time. Perhaps I will get
> into reading more of your posts in the future if I can wade through the
> insults to find some learning and teaching.


*bhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha* Learning from Anyone is apparently
waaaaaaaay beneath your 'dignity'. You bet it's an interesting time! You've
shown me that the people I've been warned about really Do exist!! There
really are people that aren't worth the time of day and are only worthy of
my derision. Should've listened to my old Dad.
>
> Blessings dear Jani
Screw thy self with thy phoney blessings Brenda

kate


> Brenda


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 6:50:02 AM3/9/03
to
Brenda will have to scroll through her annoying headers like everyone else
(yeah, I know, blame her):

> ***never did kate....

You insulted *individual* members of so many cultures, you cannot even
keep your lies about them straight. Thanks for helping you sort your lies
is not needed.

> and if you understood you would realize that.

Your compulsive lying isn't all that difficult to perceive. Four year
old average kids lie more proficiently than Blenda does. It's no great
thing.

> I have
> not once told any culture how to behave. I talk to people as
> individual..not one mass as you tend to.

Again, it is individuals who constitute being representive of their
various cultural backgrounds. When you insult an individual's culture, (as
you have, again and again), you insult that culture. Got it, cult-ural
thief?

> A fair chance? you GAVE me?
> giggle....

Tell the readers why a compulsive liar such as yourself deserves any
better than you've been given so far, Blenda. Some kind folks have even
given you the benefit of the doubt and then ... you post, removing all
doubt. If you need to fix the blame, cease pointing at others and look to
the source of your problems, Blenda. You.

> kate..you're scared...scared to like me because

You wish Kate were afraid of you or would *like* you but, looking at
you, Blenda - what is there to fear? What is there to like? You are
mundane. Without the faintest spark of magic or divinity. There is no
shadow to you, you are all fluff.

> then you may have to try
> and understand me and a few others may get angry at you. That about sums
> it up.

The trouble is, you are all too easily understood. There is nothing
complex about you and your simple agendas stand naked and shivering in the
light, Blenda. Others may or may not have become angry with Kate, (or any
posters), for what ever reasons. That "sums up" nothing. What it indicates
is a tendency for you to attempt to drag others in front of your own
short-comings in a feeble diversionary _human-shield_ tactic. That doesn't
work. What else have you got?

> Anything or person that you don't understand...you are frightened
> of.
>

By that _reasoning_, (and the term is used nearly as loosely as your
*cunt magic* bullshit), since she is obviously not in the least frightened
of the likes of Blenda, she must understand you. What is it that you hope,
Blenda? That others who can see right through you will help you to see that
which eludes you? Hmm ... the strategy might work but for two things; you
lack the ability to strategize or to learn. All you have is a defective
method of lying, jazzed-up with the label of "ravening", (and few, if any,
buy that nonsense).

> >
> >..'least I don't try to
> >> hurt others and go about insulting constantly. I would care if you got
hit

> >> by a truck kate therein lies the difference twixt you and me I reckon.


> >
> >I 'reckon' you could give a husky fuck about me getting hurt. You've hurt
> >others. Just because you can't hurt me, you put on with the love bit?
>

> ***I have hurt no one. You are afraid of me and that is okay...

It is your promotion of the cult of mindless monism that has the
potential to hurt others, Blenda. That is not something to fear, for those
who have minds, (which promptly leaves you at the door), but is something to
be mindfully-opposed.

> but if
> you'd let your ego go once in awhile you'd realize that I am a friend.
>

All you have is your own _ego_, Blanda. It is your only friend. Those
whom you believe are your "friends" in RL are merely using you for their own
purposes. You may believe that you are _teaching_ them; this is your
strongest ego-delusion.

>
> >Keep it Brenda. I have almost too much love in my life already, don't


need love
> >from someone like you. A long time ago, we could've had something of a
> >relationship, but the more I get to know you here, read your words, the
less
> >likely that possibility is.
>
> ****no one can have too much love. I would welcome love from you readily
> and happily whether or not you let others know.

That is the insidious nature of Brenda's cult of mindless
'white-lighter' love and fluff; it conceals the truly evil core within it.
With every disingenuous post where Blanda pretends to flee from her ego, she
runs toward it. Welcome that binding which you have forgotten. It has not
forgotten you.

> I don't dream of it or
> pain for it..but I know it is there and it will come of its own time.
> We engage in one another for a time of learning...there is love there or
> else there would be total avoidance.
>

Since you are incapable of learning, it is not "amazing" that you avoid
the uncomfortable posts such as you do. You have nothing to teach, Blenda.

> >
> >kate
Trevor
> >>
>
> falseBlessings and disingenuouslove
> Brenda


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 6:55:21 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent"

>***....the rest of the newsgroup
> are probably retching...oh wait..you do find me
> disgusting...
>
> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 6:58:49 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" wrote:

...pompousity


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:00:41 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" wrote:

> ...the war is the thing..

> B***da

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:03:42 AM3/9/03
to
You've got a weird idea of "fine" then, Hy.

Jani

"hy" <hybi...@home.com> wrote in message news:3E6B0531...@home.com...

t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:02:30 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da" wrote:
>
> ***No this is not called ravening at all.

> big old squishy hugs...
> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:03:50 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" wrote:

> > ...sometimes I feel let down or sad

> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:07:50 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" wrote:

> *****alone?
>
B***da's greatest fear of all.


>
> ***seeing as I don't see them....
>

There's a helluva lot you cannot see but, that's just you. Normal folk
can see you as you are, not as you wish to be seen.

>
> **Brenda who loves kate.

Cultist.


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:09:23 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" catches sight of herself:
> >
>
> ****yes...how odd...how odd.
>
>
> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:10:36 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" forgets what she's replying to:

> what ditty?

> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:12:38 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" expressed concern over her paranoia:
>
> **** I am not paranoid...or particularly worried
> >>
> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:14:17 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" recalls being laughed at by Catholic School-girls as a
child:

>
> ***They don't scare me emotionally...

> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:16:39 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent", proudly stupid, declares:

> ***...I'm not embarrassed
> ***yes it is defining.

> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:19:19 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" barely has time to do:

> *** a lot of Fundie Christian men .....and in a hurry.
>
> B***da


t_naismith

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:21:16 AM3/9/03
to
"B***da G. Kent" pickup techniques:

> *** Stupidity? naivete?
> I don't care as long as I get offers....

> B***da


Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:48:38 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> >[7] news:OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> >> *chuckle* Another volley of bitching and spitting? You really should do
> >> something about that anger, you know ... A little lesson for you,
slitch.
> >> The more you whore yourself out in public, and the more you show
yourself
> >up
> >
>
> ***my anger takes forever to come out actually. You have not seen my anger
> really. Whore? slitch again? oh no....what judgementalism Jani sweets.

Lying slitch is what you are, since lying is what you do. There's no other
'judgement' possible, since you ARE a liar. It's a simple enough concept to
grasp, after all.


>
> > telling everyone that you got laid, the more you demean yourself. You
seem
>
> ****I think that at 41 if most people don't know that I have gotten laid
> throughout my life ...then it would not come as a shock so much.

Exactly. At 40-odd years old, you find it necessary to act like a rather
foul-mouthed teenager after her first fumble. It's hardly the way grown
women behave.

> >> to be totally ignorant of the idea that having self-respect, respect
for
> >> one's partner, and keeping private matters private is not repression.
But
>
> ***I respect myself immensely as I believe we all are God. I respect my
> partner for the same reason. What partner did I talk about Jani? What do I
> say about what I do besides one episode I talked about because it had to
> do with Wills thread on cunt magick and using semen for magick? Did I
> mention the person? did I give details about his penis or any tell-tale
> tattoos? you're a hoot....

Do you not understand that your whorish behaviour *is insulting to anyone
who has the misfortune to be your partner? Or perhaps he has as little
self-respect as you, and doesn't care that his girlfriend blazons herself
across Usenet. I expect there *are men in the world who think so little of
themselves .....


>
> >> then, concepts like truth and integrity escape you completely, so it's
> >> hardly surprising that you have no idea how to behave in public in
other
> >> respects.
> >>
>
> **** my dear....talking about sex is what many of us adults do sometimes.
> There is nothing wrong with it and the fact that you have never talked
> about sex to more than one person at a time is amazing to me.

And where did I say that, moron? As I pointed out before, the whole of the
child pornography debate is *about sex*. And it's a *public* debate, which
I'm posting to.

You HAVE had
> sex right? you know how wonderful it is?

I have three children, so I think it would be safe to assume that I've had
sex. What I *haven't done is act like a whore on Usenet. See the difference,
slitch?

then why without naming names is
> it wrong to talk about it with other mainly adults? I have two friends who
> are hmmmm what's the word? they don't have sex....anyone..one hates it and
> does not want any mention (she is in her 30's and has not had sex ever)
> and one is in her 50's (celebate! that's the word) and she loves talking
> about sex. Most of the witches I know love talking about sex. A lot of the
> lesbians don't for some reason but the Bisexuals and the heteros and the
> 'mos seem to..at least in my circles. I fit in perfectly....and we have
> all had lovely conversations. So as far as not fitting in public or what
> have you..you have a very narrow construct of what many people talk about.

And all these people post eulogies to their genitals on newsgroups, do they?
How very sad. But a most appropriate social circle for you to be mixing
with.

> Now as far as the judging me goes.....what you have said already does
> nothing to me..so why do you think this will matter? I am learning some
> things from you however...it is an interesting time. Perhaps I will get
> into reading more of your posts in the future if I can wade through the
> insults to find some learning and teaching.

I don't particularly care whether you learn or not: doubtful, since you've
shown no evidence of it so far. However, do continue showing yourself up.
It's certainly a lesson for others.

Jani


Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 7:55:55 AM3/9/03
to
You planted yourself firmly and irrevocably in the mire with your lies about
the Families, and you know it, slitch. Tweet on about 'loving' and
'learning' as much as you like, pretend that everyone else is 'angry' or
'fearful', but that one FACT will not go away. You're a liar, however much
you backpedal and obfuscate and hope people will forget about it.

Jani

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:00:49 AM3/9/03
to
Kate is an elder to many. Unlike you, who merely pretended to be one in
order to flame a newbie who knew far more than you did. Lies and disrespect
again ..

Jani

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:12:53 AM3/9/03
to

"hy" <hybi...@home.com> wrote in message news:3E6B0531...@home.com...

Who? Brenda or me? I'm doing just fine, how about you Carrie? Common sense
never hurt anyone.

kate
>


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:09:14 AM3/9/03
to

"ren" <r...@bookofshadows.org> wrote in message
news:7hth6v41qiu8vq3ni...@4ax.com...
>
> >Do I have to invite every guy that comes on to me
> >heh.
> >Brenda
>
> I don't know. Do they need an invitation?

Lurkers don't. ::heh::


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:19:08 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:45:42 -0800
> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.discordia,
> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> >
> >
> >> >You're telling the world how much you love sex and you don't know a
slut
> >> >gets wound up???????? Dumb ass. *lol*
> >>
> >> ****no...not a slut...whatever that is... Do non-sluts hate sex katie?
> >
> >You're totally missing the msg here, as usual.
>
> ***heh...you don't get it ..do you? LOL!
>
> >
> >> tell me your experiences.
> >
> >You go first. ;)3
>
> ***no I would not want to shock you too much.

Afraid after talking about your cunt so much to tell a story? Not much
shocks me anymore. I knew you'd back out of this.
>
> >
> >> kisses ..
> >> Brenda
> >
> >Givin' me kisses now? *har* I knew you liked me, but jeez!
> >>
> >> >
>
> ****big wet ones...
>
>
> >> >
> >> >aren't we all loose katie?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >At the right times, "bren". At the right times.
> >> >
> >>
> >> *****alone?

Yes, you are.
> >>
> >>
> >> >> what ditty?
> >> >
> >> >I'm going to keep writing those, seein' as you like them so much. ;)
> >> >
> >>
> >> ***seeing as I don't see them....keep on m'dear.
> >>
> >> >> Brenda
> >>
> >
> >
> >*chuckle* You're sure some cheap entertainment sometimes.
> >>
>
> ****heh..and YOU think I don't get the msg! LOL!
> well at least we entertain each other katie....the rest of the newsgroup
> are probably retching...but we have fun...oh wait..you don't find me
> hilarious as you said..but disgusting...or has that changed again?

Did it ever occur to you that there are different ways to whore yourself
besides sex Brenda? Nothing's changed.

kate
>
> Brenda


kate

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:51:27 AM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:50:41 -0800
> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.discordia,
> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> >
> >
> >"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> >[7] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >> >
> >> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >> >
> >> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> >> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> >> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:54:39 -0800
> >> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> >> > Newsgroups:
> >> > [2] alt.pagan,
> >> > [3] alt.discordia,
> >> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
> >> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> >> > References:
> >> > [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> >> > [7] <Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
> >> >[8] [8] news:Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...
> >> >>
> >> >> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> >> >> [9] [9] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > Re: I like BRENDA
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
> >> >> > > Reply to: [1] "kate"
> >> >> > > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:16:23 -0800
> >> >> > > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
> >> >> > > Newsgroups:
> >> >> > > [2] alt.pagan,
> >> >> > > [3] alt.discordia,
> >> >> > > [4] alt.religion.wicca
> >> >> > > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> >> >> > > References:
> >> >> > > [6] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> >> >> > > [7]
<Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >"headkase" <psykoexg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >> >> > >[8] [10] [10]
news:Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254..
> >.
> >> >> > >> wt...@victoria.tc.ca (Brenda G. Kent) wrote in
> >> >> > >> [9] [11] [11] news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca:
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> Men don't
> >> >> > >> > frighten me sexually.

That's because that's how you manipulate the


> >> >> > >> >
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> me neither but they scare the fuck out of me emotionally.
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> > >> headkase
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >Well..........that's a whole other subject right there. I think
> >Brenda
> >> >> would
> >> >> > >agree with you. That's a serious subject headcase. *sigh*
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > >kate
> >> >> > >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > ***They don't scare me emotionally...sometimes I feel let down or
sad
> >> >> > ...but not fear really.
> >> >
> >> >Why is it that you rarely answer a man here then? Except for those
> >adoring
> >> >posts to your drunken poet, you rarely do. Could it be....fear?
> >> >
> >>
> >> ***rarely answer a man? very few men post insults to me for one or lie
> >> about me.....for another reason...more women then men post on this
> >> newsgroup...another reason? I have yet to see a lot of interesting
threads
> >> period. I have answered a few men however...and insult very very very
few
> >> people over all.

No, you don't enter in with any man that's really worth his salt around
here. Overall, you seem to insult everyone, in one way or another. If you
can't find many interesting threads here, go back to christnet, you seem to
have fun there. There are a Lot of men that post here, shows how much you
really pay attention to anything but flames directed at you.


> >
> >You still just talk to the men that don't 'threaten' your precious ego in
> >some way. You Are an insult. It's amazing you're breathing.
>
>
> ****?? what precious ego? I talk to whom I wish and whomever posts a topic
> I am interested in. Now go and look and you will find the majority of the
> posts are insults....rather boring for me really...so I wait for something
> good...talk of Kabbalah....interesting but not my interests now. Speak of
> quantum physics or time travel...worm holes and the like..speak of
> shamanic travelling..speak of many things and I will talk. Now insult for
> no reason...and I will probably wait till the person gets it out of their
> system as insults and flames are a waste of energy but do have some
> learning potential. I read Davids posts at times because I find him
> interesting ...the wild man of the forest kind of thing...and Michael I
> love as well. In Will I find a loyal friend and a talented poet. Take
> Caliban...supposedly a guy..but he flames far too much...pompousity in
> stick form up his ass. He may be a lovely man in reality but has too much
> arrogance and ego for me to bother with right now. Parse makes me laugh!
> Duane is fine and that new poster who has a bead on CIB I do like!

Lemme see. Will seems to kiss your ass and vice-versa, that's
understandable. David and I have straightened things out as far as you, I
think. He has a brain. Micheal is decent to me, and I like him much of the
time if You aren't involved. Parse is a dipshit like you are, that's also
understandable, altho he's had some good things to say lately. Too late for
me to answer him though, that's on principle. Cal just plain thinks you're
an ass. No wonder you can't talk to him. You don't stand up to anyone afaic
see. None of the men that don't kiss your ass. I get sick of your obvious
adoration of the men you Do talk to. Duane has his own take on things. Can't
say anything about him, we haven't interacted. We likely will though. Reply
to Romauld, reply to Trevor, reply to Tales, reply to root. Any of them, and
many more.


>
> >>
> >> Why do you continually post to me when I don't read every one? high hop
es?
> >
> >Aww. You read my other post before this one. How sweet.
> >>
>
> ***yes I did. Yes I am. :)

I would've thought my post "Specifics For Brenda" would've shown what I
think of your 'sweetness'. I posted honestly what I think of you there.
G'night Brenda.


>
> >>
> >> >kate
> >> >
> >> >> > Brenda
> >> >>
> >> >> Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to
discover
> >> >that
> >> >> they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.
> >> >
> >> ****Never had a guy leave me before I wake up so I don't know
> >> what that is like actually...heh.....you just keep on lieing don't ya
> >> sweetie. First
> >> you say I am a
> >> slut..then you say I don't answer men cuz I am a-feared of them...now
you
> >> say I sleep with everyone! heh...let me know when the pills wear off.
> >> You need so much love katie.
> >
> >*chuckle* You aren't answering me here dip. It's Nightwish too. Isn't
this
> >fun NW?
> >
>
> ***** well as long as we get the answers straight then I am fine.

I call you confused and in too much of a hurry. Actually, in another post,
you Again picked this paragraph, telling me that I said what she did. Also,
you said that I was the one that said what Jani said. All in the same
paragraph. No hon, I'd say that you're not fine. Can't answer me, unless you
can discern what I and I alone have said to you, now can you. Nope, not fine
at all.


>
>
> >kate
> >>
>
> ***huggles katie.
> ps. take care with the young ones katie...you ARE an elder to Nightwish.

Nightwish and I get along just fine, as she does with most people. I'm sure
we can actually share, unlike you Brenda. I have respect for the young ones,
I was young myself once. You still are, but in an entirely different way.
Childish 41 year old. I don't respect You at all. I'm Your elder also.


kate


NightMist

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 12:15:42 PM3/9/03
to
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:17:35 -0500, "Ironywaves"
<irony...@knology.net> wrote:

>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

>news:3e68...@news.victoria.tc.ca...


>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:42:27 -0800
>> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:

>> > [6] <3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca>


>> >
>> >
>> >"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

>> >[7] news:3e67...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
>> >> >
>> >> > I like BRENDA


>> >> >
>> >> > From: "gurdjieff 0f gormorrah" <jamf...@comcast.net>
>> >> > Reply to: [1] "gurdjieff 0f gormorrah"
>> >> > Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 02:18:35 -0600
>> >> > Newsgroups:
>> >> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> >> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> >> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> >> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> >
>>

>> >Oh gosh, golly gee!
>> >Why not invite This one
>> >Over for tea?
>>
>> ***cuz he wants sex ..and I already have a boyfriend.
>> Do I have to invite every guy that comes on to me ...to have...uhm..tea?
>> heh.
>> Brenda
>
>Sometimes tea is just tea. Why not have a guy for tea?
>
>
Because they take just bloody forever to infuse properly and you have
to keep reheating the water and the result isn't all that anyway.
Sort of funky skunky.

I much prefer a strong Lapsang Souchong.

NightMist
--

everybody is somebodys chew toy

NightMist

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 12:18:28 PM3/9/03
to
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 04:36:56 GMT, "Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net>
wrote:

>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

>news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...


>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>> > Reply to: [1] "kate"
>> > Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:16:23 -0800
>> > Organization: SilverPentagram.org
>> > Newsgroups:
>> > [2] alt.pagan,
>> > [3] alt.discordia,
>> > [4] alt.religion.wicca
>> > Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
>> > References:

>> > [6] <3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>> > [7] <Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254>
>> >
>> >
>> >"headkase" <psykoexg...@hotmail.com> wrote in message

>> >[8] news:Xns9338CEE53C1F9ps...@210.49.20.254...


>> >> wt...@victoria.tc.ca (Brenda G. Kent) wrote in

>> >> [9] news:3e69...@news.victoria.tc.ca:


>> >>
>> >> Men don't
>> >> > frighten me sexually.
>> >> >

>> >> > Brenda


>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> me neither but they scare the fuck out of me emotionally.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> headkase
>> >
>> >Well..........that's a whole other subject right there. I think Brenda
>would
>> >agree with you. That's a serious subject headcase. *sigh*
>> >
>> >kate
>> >>
>>
>> ***They don't scare me emotionally...sometimes I feel let down or sad
>> ...but not fear really.

>> Brenda
>
>Those are natural reactions to waking the next morning only to discover that
>they've already left. Oh well. Another day, another man.
>
>

Bah, worse is to find out they are still there.
True Muskrat Love.
Can I chew off the arm he is lying on and get out the door before his
pretty little eyes open.

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:19:59 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 09:56:13 GMT
> Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>

>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[6] news:3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "kate" <tyle...@yahoo.com>
>
>> >Nightwish told you she didn't need or want your 'help' either Brenda.
>What
>> >did you do? Kept on and on until you were blue in the face. You're an
>> >embarrassement.
>>
>> ***actually she asked everyone for help..then afterwards said that she did
>> not want mine particularly as befitting the schoolyard gang. Not an
>> embarrassment at all...I'm not embarrassed and if you are ...well then?
>
>You're a consistent embarrassment to Pagans who value integrity and
>respect - namely, the ones you've lied about and insulted. However,
>displaying your own ignorance and pretentiousness embarrasses no-one but
>you. Nightwish told you to butt out because she wanted *practical advice,
>not your futile attempts to present yourself as some sort of "teacher".

****No embarrassment at all. People come on here and they wonder at all
the insults and flames. They end up seeing many pagans are nit-picking
idiots instead of friends and allies. I have not lied about anyone and
only insulted a few in as gentle a way as possible when their insults and
lies to me got to a ridiculous degree. Nightwish told me to butt out
because she is following in the schoolyard gangs footsteps due to her
wanting to fit in with your lot. She asked for help period.....and then
turned her nose up at the Socratic method instead of just saying "no
thanks". She is just starting out and eighteen...so despite age not being
a good enough reason for being snotty...I acknowledge that she is young
and trying to find where she fits in.


>
>> > Secondly I don't
>> >> consider calling someone stupid....or easy...is helpful...specially
>when
>> >> that is a bunch of crap. Whoring? I don't charge m'lady. Try the same
>> >> attitude on men and you would be laughed off the face of the earth.
>Does
>> >> it ever occur to you that I don't think of men as just sexual "takers"
>and
>> >> that I am some poor innocent lamb being taken?
>> >
>> >
>> >It's perfectly obvious you're no innocent. Just a slut.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> *****what's a slut katie?
>>
>>
>> > Does it ever occur to you
>> >> that I *like* sex and have a great relationship with my boyfriend?
>> >
>> >Who's your boyfriend? Pashta? Or maybe one of your 'students'?
>> >
>>
>> ***you need to get a life dearie....
>
>She *has* a life, and a damn good one, too. Why she wastes her time trying
>to help you out of the mire you've got yourself into is beyond me, except
>that she's the kind of person who *does help, and *does teach, even if it's
>obviously a lost cause.
>
>> >

****help me out? now there is condescension. OUt of the mire? not in any
Jani. You obviously take all of this as more serious than I do...it is
newsgroup persona posing..nothing more. No one teaches by
insulting...except for what not to do. She and you ought to realize that
insulting people does not unite.


>> >> Gads...you two are so bloody repressed it is sickening..and what is
>> >> worse..instead of supporting your fellow "woman" you have the same
>double
>> >> standard that a lot of Fundie Christian men have.
>> >
>> >Fellow woman? You? *mwhahahahhahahahahahahaha!* Sounds like you're angry
>> >here Miss Love and Light.
>> >
>>
>> ***sounds like it..but actually I was giggling all the way through
>> it.
>
>Really? There's something decidedly twisted about calling someone "bloody
>repressed" and "sickening" while giggling like a vapid moron. To admit to
>anger would at least have been honest - but then you don't do "honest", do
>you, lying slitch?
>

****perhaps to you..but I think freaking out at everything another person
does...constantly taking them the wrong way..holding on to grudges for
years and lieing ad nauseum about them to others is far more twisted and
sickening.


>> > What ever cult you are
>> >> speaking of I would'nt know. I have more respect for myself in my
>little
>> >> finger than you would ever know and possibly have in your whole body.
>> >
>> >> I
>> >> think I am wonderful...not better
>> >
>> >Not better? Your above statement says otherwise. You keep doing this over
>> >and over Brenda, you condescending slut.
>> >
>> >
>> ****No...it says possibly know or have...learn to read.
>>
>>
>> > but wonderful as I think everyone
>> >> is...
>> >
>> >Lying sack of shit.
>> >
>> ***no not lying....not like you are doing calling me a slut.
>>
>>
>>
>> >and you believe that hiding talk of sex or bodies is something to be
>> >> proud of when it only shows how ashamed you are of the whole blessed
>> >> experience. I can just see you passing judgement on woman of the
>streets.
>> >
>> >No. Women on the streets have their reasons for being there. Sex is
>> >something we keep mostly to ourselves, we don't advertise how great we
>are
>> >at it. You do. Eh, it's simple Brenda, if you advertise, some day some
>> >lurker's going to show up at your door. You ain't any harder to find than
>> >anyone else.
>> >
>> ****I never advertised how great I was at it either katie....you sure read
>> a lot into saying that I like my cunt. Katie..if you don't advertise a
>> person could show up at your door..what's your point?
>>
>>
>> >> Instead of supporting them in either their choices to get off the
>streets
>> >> or stay....you would be judging them like some Aghani morality police.
>> >
>> >Hmmm.......haven't worked with prostitutes, but have worked for battered
>> >women and children. Who do you think is more important smart-ass,
>children
>> >with bruises all over their bodies, or a woman that's made a choice to
>make
>> >a living from her body? FWIW, I support legalized prostitution.
>> >
>>
>> ****the children and the woman argument does not have anything to do with
>> this conversation for one..and if you support legalized prostitution then
>> do you also believe in calling them sluts and judgementalizing all over
>> them too? Goodness you have one face for people who don't sell sex or have
>> sex with everyone they meet and then one for prostitutes.
>
>Prostitutes are professionals selling sex, advertise as such, and deserve
>the same respect as anyone else in business. Amateurs who insist on
>publicising private matters on Usenet merely display for all to see how
>little they respect themselves, and their partners.


****I respect myself totally Jani...you on the other hand show yourself to
be a hateful and hypocritical woman clinging desparately a'la drama Queen
to your own view of me which is so wrong it is laughable. My partners
don't get discussed on Usenet as far as you know...only nameless people.
No one gets discussed...except me if the story fits in the context.

>
>>
>> >> I think you need sex.....and in a hurry.
>> >
>> >See? That's the defining point in this whole post. "You need sex......and
>in
>> >a hurry". *haha*
>> >
>>
>> ***yes it is defining.
>
>It shows that you consider that women who don't act like whores in public
>are "repressed" and "need sex". What a strange and warped concept of
>femininity and sexuality you have.
>>

****No...I feel that people who go nuts on others for speaking my way are
repressed and need sex. I know few women who act like whores (standing on
street corners and charging for sex)...and I also don't say on one hand
that whores are professionals that are to be respected and then turn
around and use *whore* as an insult. What a laugh.

>
>> >> Your dark side is continuing to show....learn from it.
>> >
>> >Your dark side is all I've seen. Learn from That, slut. Jani isn't
>learning
>>
>> ****ah..no...not slut..follow Jani and call me a slitch or lie more about
>> my sexual habits or how I interact with people.
>> You have not in the least seen my dark side.
>
>Your sexual habits are displayed for all to see on the newsgroup, since you
>insist on telling all and sundry about them.
>>

****which sexual habits Jani? I have told all about all of my sexual
habits? news to me hon.

>>
>> >a blessed thing from you except contempt for such as yourself. Neither am
>I,
>> >though I keep trying to help you grow up. I'm done with that, but hope I
>> >don't end up reading about you in the newspapers. Go ahead and lord it
>over
>> >all of us Brenda. Like I said, your day is coming. You feel much too
>secure
>> >hiding behind that computer of yours. Have a drink, smoke a joint, calm
>> >down. Maybe go for a walk. Gods, what a bitch you are.
>> >
>
>> ****help me grow up? how amazingly condescending you are Katie...you don't
>> even see it yourself. Lord what over? that I like my parts? get a grip
>> woman you are an emotional basketcase.
>
>Kate has self-respect, common sense and integrity. Whereas your flailings
>and mindless outpourings could well be described as the ramblings of an
>"emotional basketcase".
>
***no kate does not have self-respect. She lies about me ....she flames
incredibly ...she says on one hand I am one way and then the other...can't
make her mind up etc. Common sense? perhaps...but I don't think so.
Integrity? I don't agree. Emotional basketcase? bwahhahahah and here you
are carrying on a grudge for years instead of letting it fall by the
wayside and I respond to your stuff once in a while.

>
>
>
>
>Hiding? no....I hide not at
>> all..this is me...not afraid to be loving..not afraid to learn..not hiding
>> behind insults or lies....just me. Drink? don't drink much...smoke a
>> joint? when boyfriend visits perhaps. Go for a walk? it's finally snowing
>> here and with all the exercise I do everyday I need a day off. Bitch? like
>> Diana the bitch goddess?
>
>Diana was the goddess of the hunt, and also of chastity. A rather ironic
>choice of deity for the likes of you, isn't it?
>

****chastity? I would not agree to that right off the bat. Diana could
easily have been a goddess for women lovers for all we know in the
esoterica of her story. It has been said that she killed a man for looking
at her and her sisters naked.....so we know that she does not like men.
Virgins of old mean basically that a woman was free and not owned by a
man...either her father,her brother, or her husband. It only later became
synonymous with a woman who had not had sex.
Perhaps I should have used the persona of Lilith....unless that Goddess
scares you too much....free,wild,Lilith on top.


>Jani

Brenda

Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:09:41 PM3/9/03
to
Is kate an elder to you? She's certainly to witless to be one to me.

"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message

news:5WGaa.19329$S07.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:25:43 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: nigh...@uir.zzn.com (NightMist)
> Reply to: [1] NightMist
> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 17:18:28 GMT
> Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.discordia,
> [4] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [5] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [6] <3e6a...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [7] <Ixzaa.2421$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>
>

**snip

>Bah, worse is to find out they are still there.
>True Muskrat Love.
>Can I chew off the arm he is lying on and get out the door before his
>pretty little eyes open.
>
>NightMist
>--
>
>everybody is somebodys chew toy

LOL!
Brenda

Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:12:42 PM3/9/03
to
"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GKGaa.19313$GV6.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>
> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> > >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> > >[7] news:OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> > > telling everyone that you got laid, the more you demean yourself. You
> seem
> >
> > ****I think that at 41 if most people don't know that I have gotten laid
> > throughout my life ...then it would not come as a shock so much.
>
> Exactly. At 40-odd years old, you find it necessary to act like a rather
> foul-mouthed teenager after her first fumble. It's hardly the way grown
> women behave.

Yes, grown women are repressive, and stupid. Unliberated, is a word used to
describe them.

> > >> to be totally ignorant of the idea that having self-respect, respect
> for
> > >> one's partner, and keeping private matters private is not repression.
> But
> >
> > ***I respect myself immensely as I believe we all are God. I respect my
> > partner for the same reason. What partner did I talk about Jani? What do
I
> > say about what I do besides one episode I talked about because it had to
> > do with Wills thread on cunt magick and using semen for magick? Did I
> > mention the person? did I give details about his penis or any tell-tale
> > tattoos? you're a hoot....
>
> Do you not understand that your whorish behaviour *is insulting to anyone
> who has the misfortune to be your partner? Or perhaps he has as little
> self-respect as you, and doesn't care that his girlfriend blazons herself
> across Usenet. I expect there *are men in the world who think so little of
> themselves .....

No, it's not. It's only an insult if they take it as an insult. Stop
trying to dictate morality for people that you don't know, and aren't even
here.


Nightwish

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 1:35:29 PM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

A little presumptuous, aren't you? Who are YOU to judge me? You have no
concept of what motivates me to do ANYTHING. I've told you time and time
again why I didn't want your help, and yet, it doesn't sink in. I'm
beginning to think I'm going to have to draw you a picture in crayon so
you'll understand. When I told you to 'butt out', as you put it, it was
because I wanted help, and you WEREN'T giving me any. I knew nothing you had
to say would ever be of any help to me, so I told you to SHUT UP. As for
what you think of me, Brenda, I couldn't give a shit less. I may be young in
body, but who's to say I don't have an old soul? I don't NEED to fit in.
I've been alone my entire life, and it suits me JUST FINE. Apparently you've
forgotten, Brenda, but I haven't, that not long ago you were trying to blame
my behavior on a poor upbringing. Changing your story, now? Not surprising
in the least. And another thing... if you think I'm trying so hard to 'fit
in' with the 'schoolyard gang', then why would I acknowledge the fact that
Parse has made some good responses to my serious posts? I mean, if I were
really trying to 'fit in', wouldn't I just flame Parse every time Parse
replied to me, since they don't like Parse? Your 'logic' is a bit flawed,
Brenda. Again, no surprise there.

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 2:43:56 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
> Reply to: [1] "Parse Tree"
> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 13:09:41 -0500
> Organization: Bell Sympatico
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <5WGaa.19329$S07.16...@news-text.cableinet.net>

>
>Is kate an elder to you? She's certainly to witless to be one to me.
>
**scuse the butting in Parse...but I take elder to mean..simply older...as
I am to Nightwish and as Kate is. Elderhood does not guarantee
intelligence or wisdom but knowing that SOME younger folks take elders as
examples is why I caution katie. Witless? perhaps.

Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 2:49:26 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
> Reply to: [1] "Parse Tree"
> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 13:12:42 -0500
> Organization: Bell Sympatico
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <GKGaa.19313$GV6.16...@news-text.cableinet.net>

>
>"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>[7] news:GKGaa.19313$GV6.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>>
>> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>> [8] news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> > >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > >[7] [9] news:OJBaa.19111$sz2.15...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>> > > telling everyone that you got laid, the more you demean yourself. You
>> seem
>> >
>> > ****I think that at 41 if most people don't know that I have gotten laid
>> > throughout my life ...then it would not come as a shock so much.
>>
>> Exactly. At 40-odd years old, you find it necessary to act like a rather
>> foul-mouthed teenager after her first fumble. It's hardly the way grown
>> women behave.

****foul-mouthed? heh...here she calls me slitch....giggle. More problems
with sexuality...amazing. Grown women all behave the same Jani? Grown
women call each other names like slitch and Bwenduh?
LOL!


>
>Yes, grown women are repressive, and stupid. Unliberated, is a word used to
>describe them.
>

*****they can be as anyone of any age can be.

>> > >> to be totally ignorant of the idea that having self-respect, respect
>> for
>> > >> one's partner, and keeping private matters private is not repression.
>> But
>> >
>> > ***I respect myself immensely as I believe we all are God. I respect my
>> > partner for the same reason. What partner did I talk about Jani? What do
>I
>> > say about what I do besides one episode I talked about because it had to
>> > do with Wills thread on cunt magick and using semen for magick? Did I
>> > mention the person? did I give details about his penis or any tell-tale
>> > tattoos? you're a hoot....
>>
>> Do you not understand that your whorish behaviour *is insulting to anyone
>> who has the misfortune to be your partner? Or perhaps he has as little
>> self-respect as you, and doesn't care that his girlfriend blazons herself
>> across Usenet. I expect there *are men in the world who think so little of
>> themselves .....

*****whorish? I don't charge lovely lady ..I keep telling you that.
Insulting? heh...misfortune? .....believe me...you should be so
lucky...giggle. Men don't own me dearie and have no problem with a strong
and sexual woman. Since I don't give names....they don't have a problem
with what little I say.


>
>No, it's not. It's only an insult if they take it as an insult. Stop
>trying to dictate morality for people that you don't know, and aren't even
>here.


****No kidding!
I keep hearing the church lady on SNL when I hear her.

Brenda

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 3:49:56 PM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
> >
> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message

> >> Exactly. At 40-odd years old, you find it necessary to act like a


rather
> >> foul-mouthed teenager after her first fumble. It's hardly the way grown
> >> women behave.
>
> ****foul-mouthed? heh...here she calls me slitch....giggle. More problems
> with sexuality...amazing. Grown women all behave the same Jani? Grown
> women call each other names like slitch and Bwenduh?

There's a reason why people don't address you by the name with which you
sign yourself. Why don't you gather your scattered wits long enough to work
out what it is?

You say rather a lot. You talk about your genitals and your sexual
experimentation, you mock previous partners you've had - given that there
are plenty of connections between pagan Usenet and the RL pagan community,
do you seriously think your current partner is happy to be associated with
someone who presents herself as the town bike? If he is, then, as I said,
evidently there are men sadly lacking in self-respect.


> >No, it's not. It's only an insult if they take it as an insult. Stop
> >trying to dictate morality for people that you don't know, and aren't
even
> >here.
>
>
> ****No kidding!
> I keep hearing the church lady on SNL when I hear her.

I wonder why you persist in equating privacy and self-respect with xtianity.
Out of all the Pagans I know, of various paths and orientations, not one
could be described as repressed (including those celibate by choice),
although there are several who prefer not to publicise their orientation in
the local community because of prejudice. What they *do have in common,
including the younger ones who might be expected to be more vocal and
exuberant, is an understanding of the difference between private and public
behaviour.

Your "morality" appears to consist solely of asserting that anyone who does
not care to flaunt themselves on the Net is not a "proper Pagan" ... which
also leads me to wonder if your cult is perhaps even more unpleasant than it
first appeared. Are all your seekers told that if they prefer to keep their
sexual activities private to themselves and their partner(s), they will be
publicly labelled as "church ladies" and accused of being repressed
christians? How ... interesting.

Jani


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:21:55 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 20:49:56 GMT
> Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[6] news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >
>> > Re: I like BRENDA
>> >
>> > From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
>> >
>> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>
>> >> Exactly. At 40-odd years old, you find it necessary to act like a
>rather
>> >> foul-mouthed teenager after her first fumble. It's hardly the way grown
>> >> women behave.
>>
>> ****foul-mouthed? heh...here she calls me slitch....giggle. More problems
>> with sexuality...amazing. Grown women all behave the same Jani? Grown
>> women call each other names like slitch and Bwenduh?
>
>There's a reason why people don't address you by the name with which you
>sign yourself. Why don't you gather your scattered wits long enough to work
>out what it is?
>

****I have Jani...it's called flaming and trolling.


***no..not mock...one person I talked about being afraid that I would use
his semen for magick...as Will talked about the same thing.


>are plenty of connections between pagan Usenet and the RL pagan community,
>do you seriously think your current partner is happy to be associated with
>someone who presents herself as the town bike? If he is, then, as I said,
>evidently there are men sadly lacking in self-respect.
>

***My sweetie knows I am not the town-bike nor does he care what you
think. You have obvious double expectations from me and everyone else. I
have seen lots of men state sexual things about themselves and you tend to
let it pass..whereas with me you lock in. I know what you are about Jani.


>
>> >No, it's not. It's only an insult if they take it as an insult. Stop
>> >trying to dictate morality for people that you don't know, and aren't
>even
>> >here.
>>
>>
>> ****No kidding!
>> I keep hearing the church lady on SNL when I hear her.
>
>I wonder why you persist in equating privacy and self-respect with xtianity.
>Out of all the Pagans I know, of various paths and orientations, not one
>could be described as repressed (including those celibate by choice),
>although there are several who prefer not to publicise their orientation in
>the local community because of prejudice. What they *do have in common,
>including the younger ones who might be expected to be more vocal and
>exuberant, is an understanding of the difference between private and public
>behaviour.
>

****your privacy and my privacy are two different things Jani. My
friends...the majority of them actually are quite free and courageous
about their orientation. They are also very happy with themselves and
their sexuality. Personally I consider public behaviour not calling
someone names and insulting left right and center...and you don't. We
differ...get over it.


> Your "morality" appears to consist solely of asserting that anyone who does
>not care to flaunt themselves on the Net is not a "proper Pagan" ... which
>also leads me to wonder if your cult is perhaps even more unpleasant than it
>first appeared. Are all your seekers told that if they prefer to keep their
>sexual activities private to themselves and their partner(s), they will be
>publicly labelled as "church ladies" and accused of being repressed
>christians? How ... interesting.
>

****once again..you enlarge. I don't flaunt myself...I speak about things
that interest me. You deem sexuality to be something hidden in the
closet...I don't agree with that extreme. I think many folks can talk
intelligently about sex without fear of their neighbour adult...going
"teehee" or extreme blushing". Since I don't mention names and have only
mentioned one person unnamed...your extreme reaction is another indication
of you having different standards for everyone else...and different ones
for Brenda. Your reaction is what I consider "church lady" attitude..not
what you may or may not do. A celibate and very anti-sexual person ...who
is a friend of mine...got angered once at me talking sexuality so openly.
She had a habit of putting down things of pleasure as disgusting..gross
etc. She asked me to stop. I then told her that if she wanted me to accept
her non-sexuality..then she had to accept my sexuality. She understood and
agreed. We are great friends because we respect each other as human beings
on the path.


>Jani

Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:25:55 PM3/9/03
to
besides all that Jani...I would not want a man who was worried about what
the neighbours think. I would want a man who is sure of himself and not a
coward..who cared about things that
matter...peace,love,tolerance,environment and spirit.
I have found such a man.

Brenda

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 4:41:30 PM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message

Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 6:24:10 PM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message

> >There's a reason why people don't address you by the name with which you


> >sign yourself. Why don't you gather your scattered wits long enough to
work
> >out what it is?
> >
>
> ****I have Jani...it's called flaming and trolling.

There you go again, assuming that everything is a silly Usenet game. Kate's
quite right, you just don't make the mental leap between what's real and
what isn't, do you?


> >> *****whorish? I don't charge lovely lady ..I keep telling you that.
> >> Insulting? heh...misfortune? .....believe me...you should be so
> >> lucky...giggle. Men don't own me dearie and have no problem with a
strong
> >> and sexual woman. Since I don't give names....they don't have a problem
> >> with what little I say.

> >You say rather a lot. You talk about your genitals and your sexual
> >experimentation, you mock previous partners you've had - given that there
>
>
> ***no..not mock...one person I talked about being afraid that I would use
> his semen for magick...as Will talked about the same thing.

Mocking his lack of understanding, and sniggering about his feeling that he
needed to protect himself. How very mature and womanly of you. Do you really
think that "not naming names" makes a difference? It's *your attitude which
is on display here, in your posts, and it's a singularly unpleasant one.

> >are plenty of connections between pagan Usenet and the RL pagan
community,
> >do you seriously think your current partner is happy to be associated
with
> >someone who presents herself as the town bike? If he is, then, as I said,
> >evidently there are men sadly lacking in self-respect.
> >
>
> ***My sweetie knows I am not the town-bike nor does he care what you
> think. You have obvious double expectations from me and everyone else. I
> have seen lots of men state sexual things about themselves and you tend to
> let it pass..whereas with me you lock in. I know what you are about Jani.

I very much doubt that you have the vaguest idea what I'm "about". And if
you want to start on double standards, perhaps you should look back at the
lies and hypocrisy you've posted, before trying to pull this wide-eyed
disingenuous nonsense that all you're doing is being "honest" about sex.


> >> ****No kidding!
> >> I keep hearing the church lady on SNL when I hear her.
> >
> >I wonder why you persist in equating privacy and self-respect with
xtianity.
> >Out of all the Pagans I know, of various paths and orientations, not one
> >could be described as repressed (including those celibate by choice),
> >although there are several who prefer not to publicise their orientation
in
> >the local community because of prejudice. What they *do have in common,
> >including the younger ones who might be expected to be more vocal and
> >exuberant, is an understanding of the difference between private and
public
> >behaviour.

> ****your privacy and my privacy are two different things Jani. My
> friends...the majority of them actually are quite free and courageous
> about their orientation. They are also very happy with themselves and
> their sexuality.

You're missing the point, as usual.


Personally I consider public behaviour not calling
> someone names and insulting left right and center...and you don't. We
> differ...get over it.

So, why did you find it perfectly acceptable to insult and lie about people
when it suited your agenda? And there's no point ducking out of it and
saying you didn't, since it's patently obvious that you did.


> > Your "morality" appears to consist solely of asserting that anyone who
does
> >not care to flaunt themselves on the Net is not a "proper Pagan" ...
which
> >also leads me to wonder if your cult is perhaps even more unpleasant than
it
> >first appeared. Are all your seekers told that if they prefer to keep
their
> >sexual activities private to themselves and their partner(s), they will
be
> >publicly labelled as "church ladies" and accused of being repressed
> >christians? How ... interesting.

>
> ****once again..you enlarge. I don't flaunt myself...I speak about things
> that interest me. You deem sexuality to be something hidden in the
> closet...I don't agree with that extreme.

Nope. Try reading what I post, rather than what you would like me to post. I
refer you, yet again, to the child pornography thread (and now the cultural
taboo thread, which I'll get back to in the morning since it's worth serious
consideration) in which it is fairly obvious to any but a rather nasty
little cultist that I have no problem discussing sexuality in a public
forum.

I think many folks can talk
> intelligently about sex without fear of their neighbour adult...going
> "teehee" or extreme blushing". Since I don't mention names and have only
> mentioned one person unnamed...your extreme reaction is another indication
> of you having different standards for everyone else...and different ones
> for Brenda. Your reaction is what I consider "church lady" attitude..not
> what you may or may not do.

Then that demonstrates both your inability to distinguish between a
"repressed xtain" and an adult pagan woman, and your *very suspect motives
in attempting to bully people into following your lead, as regards
publishing their sexual experiences on the Net, or risking castigation as
someone who, according to you, puts sexuality "in the closet". Again, is
this so-called "openness" something which is required of your seekers?

A celibate and very anti-sexual person ...who
> is a friend of mine...got angered once at me talking sexuality so openly.
> She had a habit of putting down things of pleasure as disgusting..gross
> etc. She asked me to stop. I then told her that if she wanted me to accept
> her non-sexuality..then she had to accept my sexuality.

I see. You "told" her. What happened when *she told *you to shut up, because
you were offending *her?


She understood and
> agreed. We are great friends because we respect each other as human beings
> on the path.

In other words, you bullied someone into accepting your way, and keeping
quiet about theirs. I hope your friend is celibate from choice, and not
because of some very hurtful experience in the past - because if it's the
latter, your attitude is even more vicious and unfeeling.

Jani


Jani

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 6:39:28 PM3/9/03
to
One who has no problem with his girlfriend lying in her teeth about her
affiliations, advertising herself all over Usenet, pretending to be a witch
to frighten men and then laughing about it in public, and screeling that
anyone who doesn't do the same is a closet xtain.

Poor bastard. Still, he won't mind when you put the wedding night pictures
up on your webpage, will he? Since you're both so "open" about your
sexuality and your public celebrations of your genitals?

Jani
(waiting for the usual panicky backpedal from slitch)


"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:22:44 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 23:24:10 GMT
> Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>
>
>"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>[6] news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

>> >> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>
>> >There's a reason why people don't address you by the name with which you
>> >sign yourself. Why don't you gather your scattered wits long enough to
>work
>> >out what it is?
>> >
>>
>> ****I have Jani...it's called flaming and trolling.
>
>There you go again, assuming that everything is a silly Usenet game. Kate's
>quite right, you just don't make the mental leap between what's real and
>what isn't, do you?
>

****heh...what is reality?


>
>> >> *****whorish? I don't charge lovely lady ..I keep telling you that.
>> >> Insulting? heh...misfortune? .....believe me...you should be so
>> >> lucky...giggle. Men don't own me dearie and have no problem with a
>strong
>> >> and sexual woman. Since I don't give names....they don't have a problem
>> >> with what little I say.
>
>> >You say rather a lot. You talk about your genitals and your sexual
>> >experimentation, you mock previous partners you've had - given that there
>>
>>
>> ***no..not mock...one person I talked about being afraid that I would use
>> his semen for magick...as Will talked about the same thing.
>
>Mocking his lack of understanding, and sniggering about his feeling that he
>needed to protect himself. How very mature and womanly of you. Do you really
>think that "not naming names" makes a difference? It's *your attitude which
>is on display here, in your posts, and it's a singularly unpleasant one.
>

*****why not mock the lack of understanding? it was ridiculous to assume
that a Hollywood movie is my life and he was a two night stand
anyway...not someone I wanted as a boyfriend. Do you
not mock others Jani? not even Brenda? not even Michael? you really think
your sh*t don't stink do you? YOUR attitude of calling names...lieing and
insulting others says far more about you than me talking about how I like
my genitals and one funny incident.


>> >are plenty of connections between pagan Usenet and the RL pagan
>community,
>> >do you seriously think your current partner is happy to be associated
>with
>> >someone who presents herself as the town bike? If he is, then, as I said,
>> >evidently there are men sadly lacking in self-respect.
>> >
>>
>> ***My sweetie knows I am not the town-bike nor does he care what you
>> think. You have obvious double expectations from me and everyone else. I
>> have seen lots of men state sexual things about themselves and you tend to
>> let it pass..whereas with me you lock in. I know what you are about Jani.
>
>I very much doubt that you have the vaguest idea what I'm "about". And if
>you want to start on double standards, perhaps you should look back at the
>lies and hypocrisy you've posted, before trying to pull this wide-eyed
>disingenuous nonsense that all you're doing is being "honest" about sex.
>

****no lies and no hypocrisy Jani. You will keep on with that until you
are rotting in the grave I suspect because you need it....it gives meaning
to your hours. I am being honest about sex....sorry if you have a hard
time with that one hon. Anyone can go back in the threads and see for
themselves...better yet...I can say something and have you scanning the
threads for hours looking for stuff. How to keep Jani busy?...heh.

>
>> >> ****No kidding!
>> >> I keep hearing the church lady on SNL when I hear her.
>> >
>> >I wonder why you persist in equating privacy and self-respect with
>xtianity.
>> >Out of all the Pagans I know, of various paths and orientations, not one
>> >could be described as repressed (including those celibate by choice),
>> >although there are several who prefer not to publicise their orientation
>in
>> >the local community because of prejudice. What they *do have in common,
>> >including the younger ones who might be expected to be more vocal and
>> >exuberant, is an understanding of the difference between private and
>public
>> >behaviour.
>
>> ****your privacy and my privacy are two different things Jani. My
>> friends...the majority of them actually are quite free and courageous
>> about their orientation. They are also very happy with themselves and
>> their sexuality.
>
>You're missing the point, as usual.
>

*****thank Gods..wouldn't want to get poked by it....I could also say the
same for you. Point being...I don't CARE what you say about my
morality ...and you don't get it.


>
> Personally I consider public behaviour not calling
>> someone names and insulting left right and center...and you don't. We
>> differ...get over it.
>
>So, why did you find it perfectly acceptable to insult and lie about people
>when it suited your agenda? And there's no point ducking out of it and
>saying you didn't, since it's patently obvious that you did.
>
>

****nope..it is not patently obvious. YOu have ignored what I have said in
regards to all my posts for eons Jani....and you know it. I already told
you what I did..and why. You choose to ignore it because you have no life
I would reckon and need to go on about the ravening.


>> > Your "morality" appears to consist solely of asserting that anyone who
>does
>> >not care to flaunt themselves on the Net is not a "proper Pagan" ...
>which
>> >also leads me to wonder if your cult is perhaps even more unpleasant than
>it
>> >first appeared. Are all your seekers told that if they prefer to keep
>their
>> >sexual activities private to themselves and their partner(s), they will
>be
>> >publicly labelled as "church ladies" and accused of being repressed
>> >christians? How ... interesting.
>
>>
>> ****once again..you enlarge. I don't flaunt myself...I speak about things
>> that interest me. You deem sexuality to be something hidden in the
>> closet...I don't agree with that extreme.
>
>Nope. Try reading what I post, rather than what you would like me to post. I
>refer you, yet again, to the child pornography thread (and now the cultural
>taboo thread, which I'll get back to in the morning since it's worth serious
>consideration) in which it is fairly obvious to any but a rather nasty
>little cultist that I have no problem discussing sexuality in a public
>forum.
>

****'scuse me but I never said anything about child pornography being a
good thing at all. I am 100% against it in fact. So whatever you are
lieing about me now...is really quite pathetic. And she ends the paragraph
with more insults...
What cult do I belong to Jani? you consider witchcraft and Christianity
cults? amazing.

>
>
> I think many folks can talk
>> intelligently about sex without fear of their neighbour adult...going
>> "teehee" or extreme blushing". Since I don't mention names and have only
>> mentioned one person unnamed...your extreme reaction is another indication
>> of you having different standards for everyone else...and different ones
>> for Brenda. Your reaction is what I consider "church lady" attitude..not
>> what you may or may not do.
>
>Then that demonstrates both your inability to distinguish between a
>"repressed xtain" and an adult pagan woman, and your *very suspect motives
>in attempting to bully people into following your lead, as regards
>publishing their sexual experiences on the Net, or risking castigation as
>someone who, according to you, puts sexuality "in the closet". Again, is
>this so-called "openness" something which is required of your seekers?
>

****Bully? bwwahahahahahah! I don't care if people post them or not..that
is their own business. If I don't want to read it...I will hop over the
post. Gods you really take little things and make them humungous don't
you? Please take that king-size bug out of your anus Jani! I doubt that
you are an adult pagan woman as you try to tell other adults how to live
their lives and what to talk about. Can we say meddling? Get a life and
work on yourself! I am an open (to a degree and it is relative anyway)
person and I don't require anyone else to be this way...but I also don't
ask of them to be judgemental and to tell others how to live or speak.

>
>
>A celibate and very anti-sexual person ...who
>> is a friend of mine...got angered once at me talking sexuality so openly.
>> She had a habit of putting down things of pleasure as disgusting..gross
>> etc. She asked me to stop. I then told her that if she wanted me to accept
>> her non-sexuality..then she had to accept my sexuality.
>
>I see. You "told" her. What happened when *she told *you to shut up, because
>you were offending *her?
>
>

****you don't read well do you? I already said it.
If her hatred of sexuality offended me and I was supposed to take it..then
she had to give me that same if we were to be friends.


> She understood and
>> agreed. We are great friends because we respect each other as human beings
>> on the path.
>
>In other words, you bullied someone into accepting your way, and keeping
>quiet about theirs. I hope your friend is celibate from choice, and not
>because of some very hurtful experience in the past - because if it's the
>latter, your attitude is even more vicious and unfeeling.

***Nope. My friend still talks down about touching and sex and that is
fine because she accepts me talking about it positively. I would not talk
about her reasons to you...and believe me..I know the reasons.


>
>Jani

*****wanted: one life.....contact Jani at ja...@blueyonder.co.uk
Until then she will continue to meddle in others'.

Brenda

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:29:08 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 23:39:28 GMT
> Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>
>One who has no problem with his girlfriend lying in her teeth about her
>affiliations, advertising herself all over Usenet, pretending to be a witch
>to frighten men and then laughing about it in public, and screeling that
>anyone who doesn't do the same is a closet xtain.
>
******oh do shut up dear....you're making yourself look worse with every
post.

>Poor bastard. Still, he won't mind when you put the wedding night pictures
>up on your webpage, will he? Since you're both so "open" about your
>sexuality and your public celebrations of your genitals?
>

****me get married again? bleah...binderedundat.
If I did get married again...I would not put a single wedding pic of my
wedding up on a webpage as I figure that's kinda .....erghhhhh...but then
that's my own opinion. No ...no wedding night sex pictures as that is
personal between me and him. I would however say to others..."I like the
sex"...and yes I know..this you consider terrible and disgraceful!
Tough noogies.


>Jani
>(waiting for the usual panicky backpedal from slitch)
>
>

****oh please....if you are waiting for me then that is SAD! again..please
get a life girlie.
Slitch is not very adult pagan woman Jani....you really should reconsider
your morality qualifiers.
Brenda

Nightwish

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 8:53:01 PM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk>
> > Reply to: [1] "Jani"
> > Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2003 23:39:28 GMT
> > Organization: blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> >
> >One who has no problem with his girlfriend lying in her teeth about her
> >affiliations, advertising herself all over Usenet, pretending to be a
witch
> >to frighten men and then laughing about it in public, and screeling that
> >anyone who doesn't do the same is a closet xtain.
> >
> ******oh do shut up dear....you're making yourself look worse with every
> post.
>

Don't EVER bitch about anyone else telling you to shut up, Brenda.

Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 9:23:09 PM3/9/03
to
"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

> >
> > Re: I like BRENDA
> >
> > From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
> > Reply to: [1] "Parse Tree"
> > Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 13:12:42 -0500
> > Organization: Bell Sympatico
> > Newsgroups:
> > [2] alt.pagan,
> > [3] alt.religion.wicca
> > Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> > References:
> > [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> > [6] <GKGaa.19313$GV6.16...@news-text.cableinet.net>
> >
> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
> >[7] news:GKGaa.19313$GV6.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...
> >>
> >> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> >> [8] news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> >Yes, grown women are repressive, and stupid. Unliberated, is a word used
to
> >describe them.
> >
>
> *****they can be as anyone of any age can be.

Brenda! I can't take the exact opposite side if you start interjecting with
sensible comments. If Jani disparages teenagers, I must disparage geezers.


Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 9:25:15 PM3/9/03
to
"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:UNNaa.19777$Av2.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>
> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> > >
> > > Re: I like BRENDA
> > >
> > > From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
> > >
> > >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message

Who cares what other people think? It's really none of their business. If
an ex of mine read that I was slutty or something, then I have no
responsibility for what their feelings about that matter are.


Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 9:27:21 PM3/9/03
to
"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
news:u2Qaa.19945$VH3.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>
> "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
> news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...
> > >> >"Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> A celibate and very anti-sexual person ...who
> > is a friend of mine...got angered once at me talking sexuality so
openly.
> > She had a habit of putting down things of pleasure as disgusting..gross
> > etc. She asked me to stop. I then told her that if she wanted me to
accept
> > her non-sexuality..then she had to accept my sexuality.
>
> I see. You "told" her. What happened when *she told *you to shut up,
because
> you were offending *her?
>
>
> She understood and
> > agreed. We are great friends because we respect each other as human
beings
> > on the path.
>
> In other words, you bullied someone into accepting your way, and keeping
> quiet about theirs. I hope your friend is celibate from choice, and not
> because of some very hurtful experience in the past - because if it's the
> latter, your attitude is even more vicious and unfeeling.

Jani, I find your anti-sexual behaviour to be quite offensive.


Nightwish

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 9:44:41 PM3/9/03
to

"Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension> wrote in message
news:XNSaa.1111$VT.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...
I don't think her behavior is anti-sexual. I think she was merely stressing
that there is a time and place for everything, and that a public forum is no
place to rant and rave about one's private parts. (Note: PRIVATE parts.)
There are just some things better kept to oneself.


Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 9:42:14 PM3/9/03
to
"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:t_Saa.2862$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

Nonsense. People talk about other people's genitals all the time.

For instance, I'm far more overtly sexual than Brenda, and yet Jani hasn't
commented against that.


Nightwish

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 10:01:16 PM3/9/03
to

"Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension> wrote in message
news:T%Saa.1146$VT.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...
That's because you don't advertise it.


Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 10:17:37 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA
>
> From: "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension>
> Reply to: [1] "Parse Tree"
> Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 21:23:09 -0500
> Organization: Bell Sympatico
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
>


>


>Brenda! I can't take the exact opposite side if you start interjecting with
>sensible comments. If Jani disparages teenagers, I must disparage geezers.

****hehe....understood Parse.

Brenda G. Kent

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 10:28:28 PM3/9/03
to
>
> Re: I like BRENDA

>
> From: "Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net>
> Reply to: [1] "Nightwish"
> Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 03:01:16 GMT
> Organization: TDS.NET Internet Services www.tds.net
> Newsgroups:
> [2] alt.pagan,
> [3] alt.religion.wicca
> Followup to: [4] newsgroup(s)
> References:
> [5] <3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca>
> [6] <u2Qaa.19945$VH3.16...@news-text.cableinet.net>
> [7] <XNSaa.1111$VT.1...@news20.bellglobal.com>
> [8] <t_Saa.2862$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net>
> [9] <T%Saa.1146$VT.1...@news20.bellglobal.com>

>
>
>"Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension> wrote in message
>[10] news:T%Saa.1146$VT.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

>> "Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
>> [11] news:t_Saa.2862$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

>> >
>> > "Parse Tree" <acc...@domain.extension> wrote in message
>> > [12] news:XNSaa.1111$VT.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...

>> > > "Jani" <ja...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message
>> > > [13] news:u2Qaa.19945$VH3.16...@news-text.cableinet.net...

>> > > >
>> > > > "Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
>> > > > [14] news:3e6b...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

*****beeeeep! I will comment on your posts when you lie about me
Nightwish. I don't *advertise* my sexual parts either. Saying you like
your parts..is not advertising. Now saying...I love my parts! you TOO can
have these parts by paying just 23.99 in four easy installments...go to
havemyparts.com and use your handy dandy credit card.....now THAT is
advertising your parts. Yes my private parts are just that MY private
parts meaning that I can do what I want with them....kinda like..my
private property. You don't like reading about anyone mentioning private
parts? then skip over the posts ...we have freedom of speech here and I
have not in the least bit gone overboard.
However....telling someone how to speak is going overboard. I told Jani to
shut up because I did not ask her for anything and she just spewed
insult.. You
told me to shut up after you asked for info...THAT was uncalled
for..especially when I was trying to help.
I don't know about you..but when I was 18, I didn't go around telling
41 year old women to shut up when they were trying to help.
Brenda

Parse Tree

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 11:34:21 PM3/9/03
to
"Nightwish" <nigh...@tds.net> wrote in message
news:0eTaa.2865$ES3.2...@kent.svc.tds.net...

OH?


Nightwish

unread,
Mar 9, 2003, 11:49:36 PM3/9/03
to

"Brenda G. Kent" <wt...@victoria.tc.ca> wrote in message
news:3e6c...@news.victoria.tc.ca...

Ah, condescending as ever. At least I know there are some things in life
that I can always count on. ANYWAY, I told you to shut up because (and this
has to be AT LEAST the 23rd time I've said this...) YOU WEREN'T HELPING. And
you only reply to me when it's convenient for you to do so. I see you
haven't addressed my posting of the 'proof' you've been asking everyone for
when they accuse you of being a liar and a hypocrite. How convenient... for
you.


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages