Hey Sid, come and be our chum!
Sizzle Flambé
That Sidney had developed a devoted fan --
No, not just one.... not just two, three, or four,
But a dozen, my God, there's a boatload or more!
He's got a Fishin' Crew, up there in Washington State,
Who all groove on his posts, they stay up so late,
And they cheer him on, they're so much on his side,
They want to bring him beers and take him for a ride!
Hey, it's a *wild* ride, it's *shark* fishin', dude;
But they know from your gonzo posts that you're in the mood;
You're the right kinda guy and they hope you'll come,
And if you do... they're gonna make you their chum!
Wild ride, on through the night!
Over waves, screaming through the darkness!
Through the wind, beyond the furthest beacon!
Where only the whale song can reach us....
Hey, it's a *dark* ride, it's lonely out here;
You came without old friends, now is it strangers you fear?
The water is cold, oooh, the water is deep,
Is it worse than your warm bed for a place to sleep?
Oh now Sid, don't you forget now,
How brave you told everyone you felt now,
And that is just why we so wanted you to come,
And now we will make you, dear Sidney, our chum.
Damaeus
Sizzle Flambé <sizzle...@gmail.com> posted the following message
on Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:27:44 -0700 (PDT):
> Who knew with all this fightin' 'bout the Lambkin man
> That Sidney had developed a devoted fan --
> No, not just one.... not just two, three, or four,
> But a dozen, my God, there's a boatload or more!
Even I recognize this one as a sockpuppet, even if it's around someone
else's hand.
Damaeus
Ren
> else's hand.
>
> Damaeus
Who's?
Sizzle Flambé
> I am not interested in being "chums"
And right there he shows his lack of reading comprehension.
It's "chum". Not "chums". http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/chum#Noun_2
"(uncountable)" means it has no plural form.
Liddle Siddly wiggler is so caught up in himself that he actually
thought that song was posted for *his* amusement, instead of everyone
else's, and that my poor old heart would be broken clean in twain if
he didn't read it. Sob, sob.
Meanwhile, everyone else enjoys a nice bit of schadenfreude at
Sidney's vicarious expense (that is, his song-persona's), and nobody
gets hurt. Now, isn't that *nice*?
Too bad, so sad, Sidney;
Blub blub, blub blub, Sidney....
Damaeus
Sizzle Flambé <sizzle...@gmail.com> posted the following message
> On Apr 29, 8:12 am, Damaeus <no-m...@damaeus.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
> > Even I recognize this one as a sockpuppet...
>
> "Alan Connor" / "Tom Newton" / "Sidney Lambe", you mean?
>
> Naah, he's more a 'nymshifter. Like Standard Oil / Esso / Exxon.
>
> Or d'ye mean "Sizzle Flambe"? (Was the 'nym not *blatant* enough???!)
>
> Except "sockpuppets" are concurrent multiple IDs of one person. So
> whose?
>
> And "even if it's around someone else's hand"?
>
> Damaeus, if it's someone *else*, then by definition it's not a
> "sockpuppet" at all.
>
> This is like that "asteroid"/"meteorite" bollix.
I just think it'd be interesting if sock puppets from two different people
got into an argument not realizing they were arguing with other
sockpuppets.
I never thought of sockpuppeting until now, but it looks kind of funny to
think about it with real sockpuppet imagery.
Damaeus
zayton
"Ren" <ren...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:946eab02-2ae3-43d5...@n7g2000prc.googlegroups.com...
I isn't.
zayton
"Damaeus" <no-...@damaeus.yahoo.invalid> wrote in message
news:tl0iv4tqaci4dq33d...@4ax.com...
> Reading from news:alt.religion.wicca,
> Sizzle Flamb� <sizzle...@gmail.com> posted the following message
I'm pretty sure that ARW has actually had two sock puppets of the same
poster in a sstaged "argument".
Ren
Pete (aka: Farts In Circles)
Sock? SOCK! Heeeeeereeeee socky-socky-socky! :P:P
Pete (aka: Farts In Circles)
> "Damaeus" <no-m...@damaeus.yahoo.invalid> wrote in message
>
> news:tl0iv4tqaci4dq33d...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > Reading from news:alt.religion.wicca,
> > on Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:32:27 -0700 (PDT):
>
> >> On Apr 29, 8:12 am, Damaeus <no-m...@damaeus.yahoo.invalid> wrote:
>
> >> > Even I recognize this one as a sockpuppet...
>
> >> "Alan Connor" / "Tom Newton" / "Sidney Lambe", you mean?
>
> >> Naah, he's more a 'nymshifter. Like Standard Oil / Esso / Exxon.
>
> >> Or d'ye mean "Sizzle Flambe"? (Was the 'nym not *blatant* enough???!)
>
> >> Except "sockpuppets" are concurrent multiple IDs of one person. So
> >> whose?
>
> >> And "even if it's around someone else's hand"?
>
> >> Damaeus, if it's someone *else*, then by definition it's not a
> >> "sockpuppet" at all.
>
> >> This is like that "asteroid"/"meteorite" bollix.
>
> > I just think it'd be interesting if sock puppets from two different people
> > got into an argument not realizing they were arguing with other
> > sockpuppets.
>
> > I never thought of sockpuppeting until now, but it looks kind of funny to
> > think about it with real sockpuppet imagery.
>
> > Damaeus
>
> I'm pretty sure that ARW has actually had two sock puppets of the same
> poster in a sstaged "argument".
Sid doesn't NEED sockpuppets, he answers and contraadicts his own
postings already!
But that doesn't mean he either isn't or doesn't have a sock puppet..