A Photograph of Mokosh's Enormous Ass
olph...@freedom.net
"Ludvig Prinn" <ludvi...@aol.commonsense> wrote in message
news:20000719001744...@ng-cs1.aol.com...
> ...would take over an hour just to download.
>
> Lud
I have no urgent appointments....
Joe
Ludvig Prinn
tac/mokosh
Mokosh )O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000719001744...@ng-cs1.aol.com>...
Rhyanon
"tac/mokosh" <mok...@hyperaction.net> wrote in message
news:8l44i...@enews4.newsguy.com...
tac/mokosh
Mokosh )O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Rhyanon wrote in message ...
Ludvig Prinn
Did I lose?
I must have missed that, between you contradicting yourself and lying and me
laughing my ass off at you.
_____________________________________
"Trauma is the engine of Initiation" - Lud
"You are a sickening, twisted THING - NOT a person, NOT HUMAN!"--Metadromos
"You MONSTER! DIE! DIE!" -- Mina Pell
Ludvig Prinn
Worker of Miracles
http://embark.to/Ludvig
tac/mokosh
BTL
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000720012610...@ng-df1.aol.com>...
>>My, you ARE bitter over losing, aren't you?
>
>Did I lose?
Yes.
>
>I must have missed that, between you contradicting yourself and lying and
me
>laughing my ass off at you.
This from the biggest prevaricator (look it up) in ARW.
Oops...another reference to "ass"... given a guess I would have thought
you'd be the more oral type.
Rhyanon
"tac/mokosh" <mok...@hyperaction.net> wrote in message
news:8l4u9...@enews3.newsguy.com...
> He kinda reminds me of Talespin...all mouth and no sense.
> Mokosh )O(
> -- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
>
>
> Rhyanon wrote in message ...
> >Isn't he? He doesn't take it well at all. tsk. >:)
> >
> >"tac/mokosh" <mok...@hyperaction.net> wrote in message
> >news:8l44i...@enews4.newsguy.com...
> >> My, you ARE bitter over losing, aren't you?
> >> Mokosh )O(
> >> -- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
> >>
> >>
> >> Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
Ludvig Prinn
> <Snort>
Your genes are showing, and porcine is hard to disguise.
>>I must have missed that, between you contradicting yourself and lying and
>me
>>laughing my ass off at you.
>
>This from the biggest prevaricator (look it up) in ARW.
What's important is that I've kicked your ass in on THIS thread. You've lied
over half a dozen times, and contradicted yourself time and time again, as well
as always directly supporting everything I've said.
So far, the only thing you've managed to do on your own is bitch, and
apparently you're only bitching about nothing. DO you even have a standpoint
here, or is your enormous ass just here for my kicking pleasure?
I mean, if that's the case I'm fine with that, but if you actually have a real
opinion of your own, go ahead and present it along with some sort of reference
that checks out.
Ludvig Prinn
tac/mokosh
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721004356...@ng-cv1.aol.com>...
snip
>What's important is that I've kicked your ass in on THIS thread. You've
lied
>over half a dozen times, and contradicted yourself time and time again, as
well
>as always directly supporting everything I've said.
I spent some time reading some of your bullshit in other threads. Seems you
have the same stock answers, almost word for word, for anyone who disagrees
with you. What do you do, cut and paste? Must be tough to be so
unimaginative.
>
>So far, the only thing you've managed to do on your own is bitch, and
>apparently you're only bitching about nothing. DO you even have a
standpoint
>here, or is your enormous ass just here for my kicking pleasure?
>I mean, if that's the case I'm fine with that, but if you actually have a
real
>opinion of your own, go ahead and present it along with some sort of
reference
>that checks out.
Naah, I'm just here to watch you jump up and down like Donald Duck with a
hotfoot.
tac/mokosh
of three minutes.
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721004611...@ng-cv1.aol.com>...
>...would take fifty artists fifty years and over a square mile of canvas.
>
>
>
>
>> <Snort>
>
>Your genes are showing, and porcine is hard to disguise.
>
>>>I must have missed that, between you contradicting yourself and lying and
>>me
>>>laughing my ass off at you.
>>
>>This from the biggest prevaricator (look it up) in ARW.
>
>What's important is that I've kicked your ass in on THIS thread. You've
lied
>over half a dozen times, and contradicted yourself time and time again, as
well
>as always directly supporting everything I've said.
>
>So far, the only thing you've managed to do on your own is bitch, and
>apparently you're only bitching about nothing. DO you even have a
standpoint
>here, or is your enormous ass just here for my kicking pleasure?
>
>I mean, if that's the case I'm fine with that, but if you actually have a
real
>opinion of your own, go ahead and present it along with some sort of
reference
>that checks out.
>
tac/mokosh
determined to, dare I say it, show your ass.
Far be it from me to keep a man from his dream.
Mokosh )O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721004611...@ng-cv1.aol.com>...
>snip
>What's important is that I've kicked your ass in on THIS thread. You've....
snip blather
Ludvig Prinn
S'what I do, baby.
Actually, he was one of the first people I thumped on Usenet--naturally, we'd
run afoul of each other pretty quickly.
_____________________________________
tac/mokosh
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721143329...@ng-cs1.aol.com>...
>>Similar, but repellent in their own special ways......
>
>S'what I do, baby.
>
>Actually, he was one of the first people I humped on Usenet--naturally,
tac/mokosh
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721203744...@ng-cs1.aol.com>...
>>>What's important is that I've kicked your ass in on THIS thread. You've
>>lied over half a dozen times, and contradicted yourself time and time
again,
>>as well as always directly supporting everything I've said.
Bullshit.
>>
>>I spent some time reading some of your bullshit in other threads.
>
>As if any of it had any bearing on *this* topic, which it doesn't.
Yes it does. You showed that you can't discuss anything without lying and
the use of cheap evasive tactics. Ergo; your word's no good.
>>Seems you
>>have the same stock answers, almost word for word, for anyone who
disagrees
>>with you.
>
>This matters how, exactly? I see the same idiotic debate tactics used over
and
>over again by morons like yourself, so naturally you're going to get the
same
>answers over and over again. If you think that my consistency is somehow a
>detriment to any argument I might make, how about you check out your own
>INconsistency?
I have consistently opined that women are the mental and emotional equal of
men. You have replied with namecalling and irrelevant bullshit about
weightlifting.
>
>After all, you lost the debate over a week ago.
snip
That was a debate? Hmm...you broke every known rule of debate, you indulged
in personal attacks with no foundation to them, you lied, you edited posts,
so what debate?
tac/mokosh
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721205214...@ng-cs1.aol.com>...
>>You really are obsessed with my ass!
>
>Well, if you dared post a picture, I'm sure I could find lots of other
>substandard features about you.
You'd find a centerfold model substandard if she disagreed with you.
>Since the only thing you admitted about
>yourself was that you had an enormous ass, I'll go with that until you get
your
>courage up.
Oooops, you lied again. I never used the word "enormous".
>Go on, tubbaguts. Post your picture.
To what purpose? You'll swear that it it isn't really me because I don't
conform to your delusions.
<G>
tac/mokosh
I just casually lobbed your stupidities back to you. That's like claiming
you won the World Series after a bout of batting practice.
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000721205359...@ng-cs1.aol.com>...
>>In your obsession with me you have started a number of NEW threads
>
>Absolute lie. I may have changed the subject line, but I didn't start a new
>thread, nor did I dig through ancient history in an attempt to find dirt on
>you.
>
>Your assertion speaks loudly of your own obsession, because you *did* do
these
>things.
>
>I win.
Ludvig Prinn
>lied
>>over half a dozen times, and contradicted yourself time and time again,
>as
>well
>>as always directly supporting everything I've said.
>
As if any of it had any bearing on *this* topic, which it doesn't.
>Seems you
>have the same stock answers, almost word for word, for anyone who disagrees
>with you.
This matters how, exactly? I see the same idiotic debate tactics used over and
over again by morons like yourself, so naturally you're going to get the same
answers over and over again. If you think that my consistency is somehow a
detriment to any argument I might make, how about you check out your own
INconsistency?
>>So far, the only thing you've managed to do on your own is bitch, and
>>apparently you're only bitching about nothing. DO you even have a
>standpoint
>>here, or is your enormous ass just here for my kicking pleasure?
>>I mean, if that's the case I'm fine with that, but if you actually have
>a
>real
>>opinion of your own, go ahead and present it along with some sort of
>reference
>>that checks out.
>
>
>Naah,
Okay, so then you admit that you have absolutely no valid purpose for being in
this thread except to get your ass kicked in.
After all, you lost the debate over a week ago. What's going on now is nothing
more than me playing soccer with your fat bloated corpse.
Ludvig Prinn
Well, if you dared post a picture, I'm sure I could find lots of other
substandard features about you. Since the only thing you admitted about
yourself was that you had an enormous ass, I'll go with that until you get your
courage up.
Go on, tubbaguts. Post your picture.
_____________________________________
Ludvig Prinn
Absolute lie. I may have changed the subject line, but I didn't start a new
thread, nor did I dig through ancient history in an attempt to find dirt on
you.
Your assertion speaks loudly of your own obsession, because you *did* do these
things.
I win.
_____________________________________
Rhyanon
"Ludvig Prinn" <ludvi...@aol.commonsense> wrote in message
news:20000721143329...@ng-cs1.aol.com...
> >Similar, but repellent in their own special ways......
>
> S'what I do, baby.
>
> Actually, he was one of the first people I thumped on Usenet--naturally,
we'd
> run afoul of each other pretty quickly.
>
Wintershard
wrote:
>People who are similar either hate each other or get along famously.
Looking at the antics of some on the newsgroup . . . no comment ;).
Bright be thy day in the sun,
Wintershard
minterra.yahoo.com
Ludvig Prinn
>>>lied over half a dozen times, and contradicted yourself time and time
>again,
>>>as well as always directly supporting everything I've said.
>
Your assertion says nothing, but the record shows I'm right.
>>>I spent some time reading some of your bullshit in other threads.
>>
>>As if any of it had any bearing on *this* topic, which it doesn't.
>
>Yes it does.
Not in the least. You may wish to think it does, but it really doesn't. It has
nothing to do with my credibility, since everything I'm saying, you've already
agreed with.
>I have consistently opined that women are the mental and emotional equal
>of
>men.
Yet you acknowledge that women have been bullied into taking lower pay for the
same jobs, which shows that they are NOT the emotional and mental equal of men.
>Hmm...you broke every known rule of debate, you indulged
>in personal attacks with no foundation to them, you lied, you edited posts,
>so what debate?
You did all that yourself, just not as well as I did it. Ergo, I won.
Ludvig Prinn
>>substandard features about you.
>
Unlikely, although most of the women who make centerfolds are just a little
skinnier than I like women.
>>Since the only thing you admitted about
>>yourself was that you had an enormous ass, I'll go with that until you
>get
>your
>>courage up.
>
>Oooops, you lied again. I never used the word "enormous".
So? I didn't quote you.
>>Go on, tubbaguts. Post your picture.
>
>To what purpose?
To back up *someone's* viewpoint, either yours or mine. Post a picture of
yourself holding up a large cardboard sign with your name on it, since that's
something you're unlikely to download online. Naturally you might get some
attractive woman to do that, but it's still less likely.
There's your challenge, fatass. Go do it.
Ludvig Prinn
>>
>>Absolute lie. I may have changed the subject line, but I didn't start a
>new
>>thread, nor did I dig through ancient history in an attempt to find dirt
>on
>>you.
Since you don't address that, you admit defeat on it.
Ludvig Prinn
Well, to tell you the truth we did get along pretty well. We just enjoyed the
dog and pony show here too much to play nice.
tac/mokosh
portions of my posts to address, and still strut about as if you'd won
something, I thought I was permitted the same privilege with your posts.
)O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000722224428...@ng-cv1.aol.com>...
>>>>In your obsession with me you have started a number of NEW threads
>>>
>>>Absolute lie. I may have changed the subject line, but I didn't start a
>>new
>>>thread, nor did I dig through ancient history in an attempt to find dirt
>>on
>>>you.
>
>Since you don't address that, you admit defeat on it.
>
Ludvig Prinn
>portions of my posts to address, and still strut about as if you'd won
>something, I thought I was permitted the same privilege with your posts.
You can, but you can't sit and cry when it happens if you're not above doing it
yourself. Note that I also didn't do a Deja search on you to find other threads
in a pathetic attempt to dig up dirt the way *you* did.
Noinden
<mok...@hyperaction.net> wrote:
> Oh, excuse me, I thought since YOU were allowed to pick and choose which
> portions of my posts to address, and still strut about as if you'd won
> something, I thought I was permitted the same privilege with your posts.
> )O(
> -- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
You forget HE is luddy the PRIG you are simply a person he will claim
to have won against despite any evidence he has .....
tac/mokosh
I don't worry about this stuff to the extent some folks do.
Mokosh )O(
-- "Are we allowed to eat these men?"
Ludvig Prinn wrote in message
<20000724151905...@ng-cv1.aol.com>...
>>Oh, excuse me, I thought since YOU were allowed to pick and choose which
>>portions of my posts to address, and still strut about as if you'd won
>>something, I thought I was permitted the same privilege with your posts.
>
Ludvig Prinn
Well, the posts in question were in a thread which had been dead over a month,
so your above statement is a lie. If you were truly dealing with things "as
they came along", you'd have commented weeks ago. As it is, you dug up
long-dead posts in a fruitless attempt to find new moral ammunition.
And again, you failed miserably.
And you didn't deny your hypocrisy either, I noticed.
>>>Oh, excuse me, I thought since YOU were allowed to pick and choose which
>>>portions of my posts to address, and still strut about as if you'd won
>>>something, I thought I was permitted the same privilege with your posts.
>>
>>You can, but you can't sit and cry when it happens if you're not above
>doing it
>>yourself.
QED.
You are a hypocrite, a liar, a forger and an idiot. You are far inferior to
myself and I suspect to most women as well.
Which nicely proves the point of the original thread in regards to superiority.
Learn to use your own power instead of fighting it.
Dumbass.