Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: gravity and hollow earth

0 views
Skip to first unread message

dh

unread,
Jul 1, 2008, 9:24:20 AM7/1/08
to
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:45:07 +0100, "pearl" <t...@signguestbook.ie> wrote:

>'Einstein's General Theory was devised to explain gravity.

How is gravity supposed to work in your supposed inner Earth?
I've asked you that before, and you won't answer. Do things just
float around? Do they have some attraction to the outer walls
or whatever, but less so than on the surface? How do you think
it works in there?

Rupert

unread,
Jul 1, 2008, 2:48:49 PM7/1/08
to

Newton's laws would imply that there would be zero gravitational field
inside there, that's a result called the shell theorem.

Message has been deleted

Malik J.J. Jubilee

unread,
Jul 1, 2008, 6:15:49 PM7/1/08
to
On Jul 1, 4:26 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.not> wrote:
> Rupert wrote:
> > Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, fat pig-fucker and moronic cracker - lied and presented no challenge:
> But the fantasy-land "hollow earth" in which the stupid foot masseuse
> lesley believes isn't like that.

i could discuss some elements of the variability of the efficiacy of
physical laws under variant constraints in multiple universes co-
tangent with each other... but you'd probably either a) consider it
gobblygook and it would be pointless, or b) you'd misuse it...

Obviously you belong to Bro Ahriman, and I ain't gonna step on his
territory without permission.

Chances are you haven't experientially experimented with how your
consciousness affects your reality, probably out of fear of being
considered a kook (even though, mistakes though one may make, at least
one's trying to better life from the status quo).

Eat Bacon, Read Goethe.

duh

unread,
Jul 1, 2008, 9:44:51 PM7/1/08
to

"Malik J.J. Jubilee" <zevill...@yahoo.com> wrote in

i could discuss some elements of the variability of the efficiacy of
physical laws under variant constraints in multiple universes co-
tangent with each other... but you'd probably either a) consider it
gobblygook and it would be pointless, or b) you'd misuse it...

Obviously you belong to Bro Ahriman, and I ain't gonna step on his
territory without permission.

Chances are you haven't experientially experimented with how your
consciousness affects your reality, probably out of fear of being
considered a kook (even though, mistakes though one may make, at least
one's trying to better life from the status quo).

Eat Bacon, Read Goethe.


please don't spare the eggs.

Malik J.J. Jubilee

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 12:30:02 AM7/2/08
to
On Jul 1, 9:44 pm, "duh" <d...@huh.com> wrote:
> "Malik J.J. Jubilee" <zevillkaa...@yahoo.com> wrote in

Green eggs and strange matter, by Dr. Einsuess

D. Stussy

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 2:06:04 AM7/2/08
to
"Rupert" <rupertm...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5a67b41b-1713-456e...@z72g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

However, gravity is the least of your problems. There's alot of pressure in
there. After all, gravity may be effectively zero since every direction is
cancelled by its opposite, but everything from the surface down is being
pulled inward on top of you.


Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 10:48:29 AM7/2/08
to
Gravity is the same on the surface inside of the Earth as it is
on the outside Earth surface. Many of the inne-Earth people
have mastered the use of certain areas of their brain (that we
here on the surface outside have but don't know.) This give
them many abilities that we would consider as a trick or magic.

They can defy gravity and move from one place to another at
will by their advanced brain powers. There's so much more
they have advanced technology of I could write book on it.
But, I won't you'll have to go there to see it in order to believe.

Rupert

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 5:32:37 PM7/2/08
to
On Jul 2, 10:48 pm, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet

<tadap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gravity is the same on the surface inside of the Earth as it is
> on the outside Earth surface.  

So Newton was wrong?

Do the inner earth beings with their advanced technology have an
alternative mathematical model for gravity?

Prince Julianus Von Rosencrantz

unread,
Jul 2, 2008, 9:17:55 PM7/2/08
to

yes they do... by Eqyptian Mathematician Mostafa Abdelkader:
http://www.facstaff.bucknell.edu/dgriffin/Research/Griffin-HE_in_Science.pdf

and in fact the two worlds really are Land and Anti-Land because of
this very fact.

Hence a rupturing universe, and the recent dilbert cartoons.

Werewolfy

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 7:44:44 AM7/3/08
to
On 2 Jul, 15:48, Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet

POPE? Still enjoying the...benefits...of certain formulae?...;)

Werewolfy

dh

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 9:59:40 AM7/3/08
to
On Tue, 1 Jul 2008 15:15:49 -0700 (PDT), "Malik J.J. Jubilee" <zevill...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jul 1, 4:26 pm, Goo wrote:
>> Rupert wrote:
>> > dh asked:


>> >> On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:45:07 +0100, "pearl" <t...@signguestbook.ie> wrote:
>> >>> 'Einstein's General Theory was devised to explain gravity.
>> >>     How is gravity supposed to work in your supposed inner Earth?
>> >> I've asked you that before, and you won't answer. Do things just
>> >> float around? Do they have some attraction to the outer walls
>> >> or whatever, but less so than on the surface? How do you think
>> >> it works in there?
>>
>> > Newton's laws would imply that there would be zero gravitational field
>> > inside there, that's a result called the shell theorem.
>>
>> But the fantasy-land "hollow earth" in which the stupid foot masseuse
>> lesley believes isn't like that.
>
>i could discuss some elements of the variability of the efficiacy of
>physical laws under variant constraints in multiple universes co-
>tangent with each other... but you'd probably either a) consider it
>gobblygook and it would be pointless,

Unless you can account for how there could be enough matter to
produce all that, *and* how it can occupy the same space. Don't just
say it would be another dimension or something, because that
certainly doesn't account for it. Of course we don't know how the
matter we're aware of got here either, but that's a different thing (reality).

>or b) you'd misuse it...

Goo lies about pretty much everything. He is the most dishonest
person I've ever encountered, and by quite a bit. I've never known
anyone to lie more than Goo does, and I've never known anyone
to lie more blatantly than Goo does. He also has a few other
dishonest tricks he likes to pull, like misquoting people, and posting
as different people in an attempt to support himselves...

>Obviously you belong to Bro Ahriman, and I ain't gonna step on his
>territory without permission.
>
>Chances are you haven't experientially experimented with how your
>consciousness affects your reality, probably out of fear of being
>considered a kook

He is certainly considered a kook, among other things similar
and worse.

dh

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 9:59:59 AM7/3/08
to

At least someone would...probably several people.

dh

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 10:00:24 AM7/3/08
to

Have they done gravity tests in deep wells?

Werewolfy

unread,
Jul 3, 2008, 1:45:35 PM7/3/08
to
On 3 Jul, 15:00, dh@. wrote:

"Have they done gravity tests in deep wells?"

The Morlocks will.

Werewolfy

0 new messages