Former drug addicts, now addicted to Scientology and the chosen internet commentpeople.
Astrid
addicts who have been through Narconon, because no one else is
brainwashed deeply enough, addicted deeply enough to Sciloontology?
They need the addictive personality to write stupid comments over and
over, like Terryeo, without waking up to the facts of abuses and
contradictions in Scientology from something they read?
If OTVIIIs are so powerful, why don't they assign them to address
issues or questions people have about Scientology, or to comment on
news articles like those in the SP Times? Don't the super powerz
allow these people to stand up to a little entheta, for the sake of
Xenu and the cult and all that is Scientological? Could it be that
these people, can't survive the exposure of truth, and they might wake
up and leave, if they realize that David Miscavige beats people?. Why
do they assign former drug addicts to this?
I'm not saying all drug addicts are stupid. They can be very bright
people who just get addicted, still, they have addictive
personalities, and a percentage of people with this type of
personality, do get easily addicted to Scientology. But the ones who
work for Scientology seem pretty lame.
I can see how Scientology might want to feature former drug addicts in
a Narconon commercial, and former addicts frequently work at drug
treatment facilities, (even non-Scientology ones) but to have them
running flak on message boards, and obviously for the OSA?
I'm not talking about ARS so much, because as we know, this is not
considered something the public views.
xenufrance
"Astrid" <Astrid...@yahoo.com> a �crit dans le message de news:
3b4d9711-d3cd-40df...@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
Like we were shouting a lot both of us ( Arnie and me, roger) before the
Fort Arson Flag's building in Clearwater in december 1999, neither then,
neither now, neither in any future will the cult be able to prove
scientifically its theories and promises of power or ability.
The main and only real advances it can give to people are to be found either
in confrontation drills (that pertains to behavioural psychology) and its
"study tech" (also behavioral, and essentially language lessons). To that,
lessons of supposed "honesty" that one could find in most societies and
religion since eons. None of this has been invented by Hubbard.
Besides, the cultic other theories are putting people in false explanations
, false memories, illusions et deceptions all along. This is very very
detrimental to their real sanity.
r