On Thursday, April 4, 2013 6:40:01 AM UTC-4, Steve Layton wrote:
> In my estimation she is probably an X - Alcohol
It takes me 3 months to finish off a case of beer, Timmy. That's with my husband's help, too. Sorry to deflate your black PR campaign, but the occasional beer to enhance a meal does not make someone an alcohol abuser :P
> or drug abuser
Nope! Drugs would be a nono with my medical problems- too many complications with my cardiac meds. That and after years of surgery and other medical procedures, I really dislike needles :P
> or a troll for OSA and is deliberately acting the way she does.
You tried that one already, sunshine. People who know I am. I just don't tell you because, well.. you are a stalking nutjob. :)
> One of the effects of Alcohol and/or drug abuse is stunted emotional growth.
Funny that you should mention "stunted emotional growth" after 42 lines of "Fuck You", Tim.
X-Received: by 10.224.207.2 with SMTP id fw2mr2249959qab.6.1364677219691;
Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.37.39 with SMTP id v7mr442195qej.27.1364677219674; Sat,
30 Mar 2013 14:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Path: v17ni6816qad.0!
nntp.google.com!ca1no18066259qab.0!
postnews.google.com!
glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 14:00:19 -0700 (PDT)
Complaints-To:
groups...@google.com
Injection-Info:
glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=71.200.70.12; posting-account=8C6UjgoAAABxMXtx5pxu9UvG0kgS3j2K
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.200.70.12
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <
ce0348b7-9aee-4bd2...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: A message for the crazy woman from Harrisburg PA.
From: Steve Layton <
stevelayton2...@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 21:00:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you,
Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you, Fuck you,
<snip of **40** more lines just like the above two>
> The evidence of her immaturity can be found in her constant name calling
How funny that you would mention immaturity when you send me emails like these:
Return-Path:
stevela...@gmail.com
Received: from
imta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (LHLO
imta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.30.39) by
sz0132.wc.mail.comcast.net with LMTP; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from
mail-ia0-x23c.google.com ([IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::23c])
by
imta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id Hlj01l01x0525BX0Nlj0sV; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:43:01 +0000
X-CAA-SPAM: 00000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fdwVfCgF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=nDghuxUhq_wA:10
a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=4RBUngkUAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=C_IRinGWAAAA:8
a=66Hr37DlxNkA:10 a=kzPeJ2-zoxYjZSuindoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
Received: by
mail-ia0-f188.google.com with SMTP id k25so411874iah.5
for <
lady...@comcast.net>; Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.85.35 with SMTP id e3mr378596qez.7.1364636580421;
Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2013 02:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Steve Layton <
stevela...@gmail.com>
To:
lady...@comcast.net
Message-Id: <
34207d25-6341-453a...@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <
7044ac27-7cb6-41d4...@googlegroups.com>
References: <
7044ac27-7cb6-41d4...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Hey Kat, go fuck yourself
MIME-Version: 1.0
Eat shit and die.
> and references to video games.
I only occasionally mention those, Tim. You mention my gaming more than I do- as if it is some great and evil sin and not the popular, accepted media with serious cognition benefits that it is.
Funny enough, you know why I mentioned them at all (or anything else about myself for that matter)? Because I knew bullies would stupidly attack it and look like morons in the process. I waved the little red cape and you charged after assuming you will gore me for my supposed slip. Toro, Toro!
> She obviously has a low self esteem because of her constant stalking of me
1) I have rather high SELF esteem. I have LOW esteem for you because of how you treat people, which has been my primary objection to your behavior. Note that when you aren't attacking me or other critics, I don't respond to your posts.
2) This is a public usegroup that I have posted on for years and lurked on since before I even became involved with chanology. The only reason I know who you are is because you have attacked me, attacked other critics and stalked my friends in the DC anon cell by phone and youtube using nasty, illegal tactics.
http://www.forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?26826-Setting-the-Record-Straight&p=677888&viewfull=1#post677888
3) You have dedicated dozens of threads to attacking me, Tim. You have sent me harassing emails. You have demanded my name and identity so that you could harass me further. If anyone is stalking here, it's YOU.
> and Greg on this newsgroup.
I haven't spoken to Greg in months, Tim. I haven't even read his posts since I last kill-filed him. How could I "stalk" Greg when I haven't spoken to him?
> She appears to be obsessed with getting attention from men, even negative attention.
That would be a faulty assumption on your part, probably based in your deeply rooted misogyny and resentment of women. That and your need to discredit everything I say because you are resentful over your outing as an OSA op.
> This could be because she has "daddy issues".
No, but keep guessing. Bullies are notorious for projecting their problems unto others... like your assumption that I have a legal history when that is YOUR problem. Or how you accuse me of being OSA when it is you who are OSA.
> She's stated that she's married but I highly doubt it.
That's because you want something to attack me over, Tim. :) You can't counter my arguments because you aren't smart enough so you go right for the ad homs and the victim act. Pathetic!