L Ron Hubbard's Sacred Stinker Scale
Feisty
Hubbard's "scientific research" at it's finest - One would have to
wonder where he came up with this research....
The body is normally sweet-smelling down to 2.0 [the lowest
non-abberated (sane) point on the Tone Scale] but begins to exude
chronically certain unpleasant effluvia from 2.0 down. Individuals
from 2.0 down commonly have bad breath. Their feet may have a
considerable odour. The musk glands are very active. The sweat has a
peculiar smell. Sexual organs emit a repelling odour. And various body
exhaust
functions are not under very good control. The person may have to
urinate or defecate under slight stresses or may weep easily for no
apparent cause. This column has not been added to this chart because
it has not been thoroughly explored but is only known in a general
way. Any slightly or greatly repulsive physical odour from an
individual does, however, indicate a tone scale position below 2.0. It
is amusing to note that in the Orient wives are commonly selected by
the sweetness of their perspiration. This is a very reliable test for
position on the tone scale. People who have bad breath as they are
processed lose it when the are above 2.0 on the tone scale. People who
are temporarily suppressed below 2.0 commonly have bad breath.
-- L. Ron Hubbard
Science of Survival
Steve Whitlatch
"Feisty" <su...@skytoday.com> writes:
>People who have bad breath as they are
>processed lose it when the are above 2.0 on the tone scale. People who
>are temporarily suppressed below 2.0 commonly have bad breath.
hubbard had bad teeth, no? I think I remember some pictures
of hubbard with bad teeth.
Who here smelled hubbards breath?
How bad was it?
--
"The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who
in times of great moral crisis maintain their neutrality."
from the "Divine Comedy" by Dante Alighieri
roger gonnet
"Feisty" <su...@skytoday.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:sTYRc.1985$FV3....@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com...
Oh yes, I reread this passage some weeks ago and was aghast by this passage.
One can't believe it.
Following the logic here, people are lower toned in summer, or in hot
countries, or when they are physically active than when they aren't?
One could also try that one: red haired people like Hubbie could be said
lower on the tone scale because they have very often an more acid odour than
others?
What about black people, whose body odour is different and seems stronger
for us than caucasians?
Or what about caucasians, whose body odours are reputedly bad for yellow
people?
r
>
RolandRB
I remember seeing pictures of Hubbo on the Apollo when the British
documentary was made "The Shrinking World of L. Ron Hubbard". The
upper parts of his front teeth were black. I wonder if he had
sweet-smelling breath then, him being a sooper-dooper OT and way high
up on the Tone Scale.
Zorrosblade........Z
>
>Hubbard's "scientific research" at it's finest - One would have to
>wonder where he came up with this research....
>
>The body is normally sweet-smelling down to 2.0 [the lowest
>non-abberated (sane) point on the Tone Scale] but begins to exude
>chronically certain unpleasant effluvia from 2.0 down. Individuals
>from 2.0 down commonly have bad breath.
With one antiseptic wave of "bad breath" 'tech', LRH sized up half the
population of Great Britain as "commonly" being "2.0 down" on the 'tone
scale':
More people than pets have dogs' breath
October 16, 2003
http://www.altcorp.com/AffinityLaboratory/halitosis.htm
London - More than half the people living in Briton have breath that
smells worse than their pet's.
And women are the worst offenders, with three out of five failing a
sulphur emissions test, according to research by toothpaste manufacturer
Aquafresh.
"Some mouths may be dirtier than cat litter," dentist Brian Grieveson
said in a statement that accompanied the research, which was released
today.
"Most people in the UK don't realise that cleaning your tongue is as
important as cleaning your teeth."
Scots had the best oral hygiene, with only 10% suffering from bad breath,
compared to 27% in London. Throughout Britain, 52% were rated at a level
that could be worse than that of a pet.
"We are one of the last countries to understand the need to clean our
tongue, with people in America and parts of Europe practicing
tongue-cleaning routinely," Grieveson said. - Reuters
(end)
I hope that Dave and Norle along with other critics from Albion are
paying attention, at least from London to Birmingham, with Leeds thrown
in because of "The Who" having recorded live there. Did you ever smell
Keith Moon's breath? Believe me, you didn't want to, unless you wanted to
pass out.
I always make sure before going on a date that the woman who's lucky to
be asked take a "sulfur emissions test", as outlined by researchers at
Aquafresh, because, if they refuse to take that test, I might just think
they were "2.0 down" on the tone scale, and worried that the 'date' might
eat a salad topped with garlic vinaigrette, where that synergy might
create an oral conflagration worthy of "the fires of Dresden".
Bad Breath Research Dump (for archives)
Bad Breath 1
Listen to Karl talk about Bad Breath 1
http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/sound/sss02102003.ram
From Dr. Karl, ABC Online
http://www.altcorp.com/AffinityLaboratory/halitosis.htm
Most of us know at least one person with bad breath, and have had the
embarrassing problem of trying to find an easy way to tell them that
their breath stinks. But it's only recently that we have found that bad
breath comes from that moist bacterial jungle in your mouth.
Some of these mouth bacteria make truly nasty chemicals, some with
disgusting names. There's "putrescine" which gives decaying meat its
special fragrance, "cadaverine" which is usually given off by corpses,
"skatole" and "methyl mercaptan" which smell like faeces, "isovaleric
acid" which smells like sweaty feet, and "hydrogen sulphide" which smells
like rotten eggs. The bacteria also emit "indole", which smells lovely at
low concentrations and is used sparingly in perfumes, but strangely
smells foul in large quantities."
The author writes like Robert Fripp pining for his home town of Wimborne
near the end of an exhausting world tour with King Crimson:
http://www.newforestonline.co.uk/scrapbook/wimborne/wimb31.jpg
Back to the dump:
"Back in the old days, people wrongly believed that rotten food in your
gut gave off bad smells which came up your oesophagus, into your mouth,
and inevitably into somebody's face. But thanks to the work of Breath
Scientists like Professor Mel Rosenberg, we now know better.
Mel Rosenberg is a Professor of Microbiology at Tel-Aviv University's of
School of Dental Medicine (http://www.tau.ac.il/~melros/). Alice Shirrell
Kaswell and Stephen Drew honoured him with their article in the Annals of
Improbable Research. They write of his many university and hospital
positions around the world. They also quote some of his research papers
that "tell the exciting story of how one man helped a tiny field of
research blossom, grow, and finally attain recognition as a distinct
branch of science" - and remember, we are talking about the Science of
Bad Breath. (Fripp! Fripp!)
It didn't come easy - he had to work hard to get to his present pinnacle
of fame. He says, "Over the past 15 years I have had the opportunity to
smell the mouths of thousands of individuals in clinics and in research
studies, not to mention the hundreds I have smelled surreptitiously in
supermarkets, in airplanes, and in synagogue during the fast day of Yom
Kippur".
First, he had to do lots of groundwork, before he was even ready to write
his first paper. Then, in the early years, after much sniffing around, he
wrote Bad Breath: Diagnosis And Treatment (1990) which was then followed
in 1992 by Measurement of Oral Malodor: Current Methods and Future
Prospects.
After much hard word and technical achievements, he then demonstrated
enough mastery in his field to be able to treat the whole patient. He
began thinking deeply both about the condition and its psychological
effects.
In 2001, his field of expertise blossomed. The growing International
Society for Breath Odor Research (ISBOR) had some 350 delegates attending
its fifth international meeting in Tokyo.
International Society for Breath Odor Research:
http://www.tau.ac.il/~melros/Society.html
Fifth international meeting in Tokyo:
http://www.eastman.ucl.ac.uk/oralmalodor2004/
And it was only 300+ pounds per attendee! What a bad breath bargain!
cont. dump:
In 2002, he finally achieved his deserved recognition for having helped
create a mature, free-standing branch of science with his article in the
Scientific American called The Science of Bad Breath.
Mel Rosenberg says that the people who are most at risk of bad breath
(once all the other causes have been excluded) are people who talk a lot.
This group includes teachers, lawyers, politicians and (of course) radio
announcers. He also lists the causes of bad breath. We now know that most
bad breath happens in the mouth, and hardly any comes from below the
tonsils.
There are a few dozen obscure causes that make up about 1% of the cases
of bad breath.
An interesting and rare condition is Trimethylaminuria. It's also called
"Fish-Odour Syndrome", and there are well over 200 cases on record.
Probably the first mention of it is in the Indian Mahabharata, which is
one of the two major Sanskrit epics (the other is the Ramayana). They are
great literary and religious works, and deal with the evolution of
Hinduism between 400 BC and 200 AD. The Mahabharata is huge - about seven
times longer than the Odyssey and the Iliad combined. A small part of it
tells the story of a young woman, Satyavata, who stank of "rotting fish".
She was expelled from society because of her smell, but a demi-god took
pity on her and bestowed a miracle cure on her.
The first modern medical report on trimethylaminuria was in 1970. It's
not confined to humans. A certain breed of Rhode Island Red chicken
produces eggs which smell "fishy", if the diet is rich in chemicals which
lead to trimethylamines (formula N(CH3)3).
We all produce trimethylamine (which smells like bad fish) from the food
we eat. Luckily, practically all of us make the enzyme that gets rid of
trimethylamine. But rarely, a person has low levels of this enzyme. So
these people have high levels of trimethylamine throughout their body.
These molecules get picked up by the blood stream, travel into the lungs,
jump into the airstream, and finally come out through the mouth - giving
these poor unfortunates the persistent odour of rotting fish. The
trimethylamine also comes out in the sweat and the urine (hence the name,
trimethylaminuria). This condition can in extreme cases have a very
severe impact on the sufferers - such as deep mental depression and
rarely, attempted suicide.
So next time, I'll talk about the causes of 99% of bad breath:
Bad Breath 2
Listen to Karl talk about Bad Breath 2
http://www.abc.net.au/science/k2/sound/sss09102003.ram
Last time, I talked about Bad Breath, and how Professor Mel Rosenberg
(http://www.tau.ac.il/~melros/) helped turn the study of Bad Breath from
a Swamp of Ignorance into a mature, free-standing branch of Science.
Thanks to his shoving his nose into the line of fire of thousands of
blasts of bad breath, we now know what causes it.
The tonsils cause about 3% of bad breath.
The tonsils are actually part of your immune system. They have tiny
little holes on their surface. Occasionally, bacteria live in these
holes, and then get killed by your immune system. These conglomerations
of dead bacteria and dead immune system cells are usually squirted out of
the little holes, and then you swallow and eat them.
But sometimes, instead of being squirted out, they stay and calcify. They
get turned into tonsilloliths (meaning "tonsil stones") that are about
half the size of a head of a match - and smell quite nasty. They cause no
other medical problems, (besides bad breath) and so many doctors and
dentists have not heard of them.
In 5-10% of cases, bad breath happens in the nose - from sinusitis, or a
reduced mucus flow, or rarely, a foreign body.
There was the curious case of a 28-year-old woman who went to her doctor
complaining of persistent bad breath. When he looked up her nose, he
found a small bead that she put up there as a young child. When he
removed the foreign body, the bad breath vanished - after quarter of a
century.
But in the vast majority of cases, 85-90%, bad breath is generated in the
mouth - and practically all of it comes from the back of your tongue. (A
small percentage of mouth-generated bad breath does come from diseased
teeth or gums. A famous encyclopaedia wrongly claims that bad breath "…
is due to the rotting debris in the pockets under the gum margins").
The tongue is triply famous. First, it’s the only muscle in your body
that gets stronger with age. Second, it’s probably the muscle that’s the
most fun to exercise. And third, the tongue is like a shag pile carpet.
The bacteria responsible for bad breath live in tiny holes on the
shag-pile surface of your tongue.
But how can you tell if your breath stinks?
Luckily, in 1995, Mel Rosenberg looked at (and solved) this problem when
he ran an "Oral Malodor Clinic" in Tel-Aviv. He set up a study to see if
people were "able to smell their own malodor". Mel worked with 52 Israeli
citizens, 43 of whom claimed that they had bad breath.
He had them run through the "well-tried-and-maybe-true" techniques for
inhaling and checking your own bad breath. He got them to cup their hands
over their mouth and nose, and then breathe out through the mouth and in
through the nose. He also got them to do the breathe-rebreathe thing
under the blankets, as well as smelling their freshly-used telephone
mouth piece and their freshly-used piece of dental floss. He even got
them licking their wrist "in a perpendicular fashion", and then sniffing
it.
He then added his own brand-new technique. They were to spit into a
laboratory dish that was then closed and cooked at 37°C for 5 minutes,
and finally "presented for odour assessment" to the spitter.
Of course, Dr. Rosenberg would be the impartial "odour judge". This meant
that he had to sniff 52 mouths breathing upon him, 52 saliva-covered
wrists, 52 telephone mouth pieces, 52 strands of dental floss, and 52
warmed-up samples of saliva in a laboratory dish. To make sure that his
nose didn’t get overloaded and stop functioning normally, he would
regularly sniff his control solution - "chicken-dung based fertiliser in
aqueous suspension ... in an opaque sniff bottle."
He found that there is no simple way to accurately know if you have bad
breath. There was absolutely no relationship between how the volunteers,
and Rosenberg, rated people’s breath odour.
The only case where there was any reliability was with his special
"incubated spit technique". It’s not simple, but you can monitor your own
breath status. Unfortunately, you have to go to the trouble of carrying
around a sealable laboratory dish, and "cooking it" in your armpit or
next to your body for 5 minutes.
But Mel Rosenberg also offered seven tips for good breath in his
Scientific American article of April, 2002.
Clean the back of your tongue with a scraper or a toothbrush;
Eat breakfast - it gets the saliva flowing and cleans the mouth;
Stop your mouth from drying out by chewing gum or drinking water;
Rinse and gargle with a mouthwash just before sleep. This slows the
growth of bacteria overnight;
Clean your mouth after you eat/drink smelly foods/drinks such as garlic,
curry or coffee. If you eat or drink foods high in proteins, clean
between your teeth;
Of course, always floss and brush;
The most reliable way to check for bad breath is ask a family member to
smell you.
That, or any of the above, is vastly preferable to spending the day
anxiously spitting in a dish, or licking your wrist.
Monday, May 21, 2001
Bad Breath
Before you open your mouth, read this
By Stephanie Allmon
Cox News Service
http://tinyurl.com/564ur
Someone alert the Environmental Protection Agency — 60 million Americans
are emitting pungent fumes from their mouths.
Better call in Ann and Abby, Dr. Ruth and the labor department, too,
because public opinion surveys show people with malodorous mouths suffer
impaired social, sexual and occupational interactions. Wouldn’t hurt to
let Alan Greenspan know that Americans spend $10 billion a year to
disguise their stinky exhales with minty flavors.
Trouble is, no matter how close your upper lip is to your nose’s tip,
you’re still “olfactorarily” impaired when it comes to smelling your own
breath.
“You get immune to your own fragrance, so of course you don’t know you
have bad breath,” said Janna Beatty, a Waco image consultant and owner of
Image Enhancers.
Beatty, who has actually been called by businesses to help with odorous
oral situations, said your inability to smell your own breath is like the
inability to smell your overdoused perfume. You may not know you offend,
but you’d better believe your co-workers do.
Before you sniff around for a solution, you should know what causes
chronic bad breath — what experts call halitosis. Contrary to some
beliefs, the problem doesn’t start in your stomach, on the roof of your
mouth or on the top of the tongue.
Jon Richter, founding director of the Pennsylvania Center for Breath
Disorders, said most bad breath originates in certain bacteria deposits
at the back of the tongue, where it starts to plunge into the throat.
Some people have more of it than other people, so their breath smells
worse, he said. Bad breath-producing bacteria contain sulfur compounds
many people associate with a “rotten egg smell,” the American Breath
Specialists report.
To further complicate things, Richter says, bad-breath-producing bacteria
hide under heaps of other types of bacteria, so mouthwashes, gum and
mints can’t touch it.
“(Gum and mints) will mask odor for a period of time with another odor,”
said Richter, a practicing dentist who started whiffing bad breath as a
hobby. “They will also give the user a sense of confidence because they
feel a strong, minty, tingly feel in their mouth.”
So-called “morning breath” is particularly pungent because when the mouth
is closed, and there’s no saliva flow while you sleep, there’s less
oxygen in the mouth.
“Bacteria that produce bad breath do better in those kinds of
environments,” Richter said.
To “cure” yourself of bad breath, Richter said, you have to have to kill
the bacteria, and you have to fight in their turf — the back of the
tongue.
Some people use a spoon to manually scrape bacteria from their tongues.
Richter developed his own system, called ProFresh, which he sells on the
Internet. His system uses a tongue scraper to scratch off top layers of
bacteria and a chlorine dioxide rinse to kill the underneath bacteria.
Before you wage an all-out battle with the little tongue-dwellers,
consider another cause of bad breath — your gums.
Steven Little, a general dentist, said a dirty mouth leads to plaque
development, which leads to tartar, which cakes on teeth, which
deteriorates gums and leads to infection, odor and disease. This calls
for not only daily brushing and flossing, he said, but a regular,
thorough periodontal cleaning of teeth and gums by qualified dentists.
Just because you have bad breath in the past doesn’t mean you have bad
health now, Richter said. But there are more serious health problems that
contribute to bad breath, according to his Web site, ProFresh.com.
In “systematic disorders,” such as diabetes or liver disease, sulfur
chemicals build up in the bloodstream and get exhaled through the lungs,
the site says. If the onset of the breath odor has been sudden, is
growing noticeably worse or has been accompanied by fever, cough or other
symptoms, you should consult a health provider, he advises.
If, by now, you think you need a breath diagnosis, some dentists have
machines called Halimeters, which measure gasses coming from bacteria in
the mouth. The American Breath Specialists also recommend trying the
following self-evaluation methods: smelling a piece of unwaxed,
unflavored floss 45 seconds after you floss your upper and lower back
molars; rubbing your tongue with a wash cloth and smelling it; licking
and smelling your own wrist. But to get the best breath analysis, swallow
your pride and ask a trusted friend, colleague or family member if you’ve
got a smelly mouth, Richter said.
If you’re on the receiving end of the odorous particles, Beatty said, be
nice but be direct. Try using humor to tell people they’re foul-mouthed
offenders, she said.
Of course, not everyone with bad breath suffers from halitosis. For
temporary cases like post-coffee odor and pre-date preparation, mints,
gum, mouthwash or spray are a good fix, Beatty said.
“I think the Boy Scouts got it right with their motto — Be Prepared,” she
said.
Oral malodor: philosophical and practical aspects.
Bosy A.
J Can Dent Assoc. 1997 Mar;63(3):196-201.
http://tinyurl.com/43btp
Although oral malodor or bad breath is an unpleasant condition
experienced by most individuals, it typically results in transient
discomfort. At least 50 per cent of the population suffer from chronic
oral malodor, however, and approximately half of these individuals
experience a severe problem that creates personal discomfort and social
embarrassment. The mouth air of chronic malodor sufferers is tainted with
compounds such as hydrogen sulphide, methyl mercaptan and organic acids,
which produce a stream of foul air that is gravely offensive to the
people in their vicinity. Sufferers often make desperate attempts to mask
their oral malodor with mints and chewing gum, compulsive brushing, and
repeatedly rinsing with commercial mouthwashes. While dental diseases
have been strongly associated with this condition, there is considerable
evidence that dentally healthy individuals can exhibit significant levels
of mouth odor. Proteolytic activity by microorganisms residing on the
tongue and teeth results in foul-smelling compounds, and is the most
common cause of oral malodor. A specialized device called the halimeter
is available to measure the volatile sulphur compounds in mouth air. Many
of the manufacturers of bad breath remedies claim that their products
contain antibacterial mechanisms with sufficient strength to control oral
malodor over long periods of time. None, however, effectively eliminate
the problem. Interest in oral malodor research and clinical treatment has
increased in the last few years, and this distressing problem is finally
getting the attention it deserves.
(end)
If that garlic heavy dump doesn't 'harvest' nntp activity via bad breath
phobias or researchers looking into bad breath 'tech' by LRH-- nothing
else will. I think the above pretty much covers Bad Breath "tech" with
it's causes&manifestations, which has nothing to do with 'the tone scale'
causing bad breath in people. I have a completist fetish, with archives
in mind. I now understand why dumping is an ARS way of life. Next time
I'll make the files even bigger and maybe even go for a 'counted line'
record....roflmfao
Z-blade
(Said with serrated gravelly voice stronger than 40 acres of crushed
garlic, signifying "2.0 and below" on the 'tone scale')
To England!!--- and Ye Olde Cheshire Cheese Pub on Fleet Street, known to
pint totting Tory's as "Barristers Barrelhaus". Thanks to Peter for the
tour, even though he refused to show me 221 Baker Street because of
calling it; "a bloody tourist trap for idiots who think Sherlock Holmes
lived there". But he was more than willing to give me the 'Strip Bar'
tour of London when pleading to see the Elgin Marbles instead:
http://www.geocities.com/mikvs_britman/01/BM3.jpg
--
--
"Tadpoles keep screaming in my ear, "Hey there! Rotter's Club!"
--Hatfield and the North
Feisty
"Steve Whitlatch" <st...@swhitlat3.com> wrote in message
news:41187771$0$44246$4c5e...@news.getnet.net...
> In article <sTYRc.1985$FV3....@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Feisty" <su...@skytoday.com> writes:
>
> >People who have bad breath as they are
> >processed lose it when the are above 2.0 on the tone scale. People
who
> >are temporarily suppressed below 2.0 commonly have bad breath.
>
>
> hubbard had bad teeth, no? I think I remember some pictures
> of hubbard with bad teeth.
As I understand, he was at the dentist having them pulled with the use
of nitrous oxide. Must have had some problems in that case. He wrote
some bizarre tech at that time. Legend has it that his teeth were
casted in order to perfectly reinact his appropriate return (by the
thousands) on October 31!
(Still in prototype for alternate return is "100 uses for Hubbards
Skull" - less a few teeth of course.)
>
> Who here smelled hubbards breath?
>
> How bad was it?
Enough for him to write about it? One guess!
A PIECE OF BLUE SKY
Scientology, Dianetics
and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed
by Jon Atack
A LYLE STUART BOOK
Published by Carol Publishing Group
Copyright c 1990 by Jon Atack
A Lyle Stuart Book
Published by Carol Publishing Group
40 INSIDE SCIENTOLOGY 1974 - 1983
For months, I was inundated with calls and visits by frightened
and confused Scientologists. I devoted all of my time to helping
them escape the clutches and some of the conditioning of the
Church. During this time in November 1983, a friend left me
700 pages of material relating to Hubbard and the Church.
In that mass of documents were affidavits by former members
of Hubbard's personal staff; affidavits by ex-Guardian's Office
staff about their criminal activities while working for the
Church; and 100 pages about Hubbard's past, including his college
reports, an abstract of his naval record and letters answering
enquiries about his supposed achievements. Each and every Hubbard
claim about his past seemed to have been false.
One of the affidavits was by Anne Rosenblum, who joined the
Sea Org in June, 1973. By the end of 1976, she was in the "Commodore's
Messenger Organization." The following spring she was finally
assigned to Hubbard's personal retinue at his California hide-out.
This is Rosenblum's description of Hubbard (she calls him "LRH"):
He had long reddish-grayish hair down past his shoulders, rotting
teeth, a really fat gut...He didn't look anything like his
pictures....
Feisty
Feisty
"roger gonnet" <r...@antisectes.net[OTER-L-ANTISPAM]> wrote in message
news:41187e27$0$23873$626a...@news.free.fr...
I think color may figure in, but in a different way...
Maybe Hubbard did find a way to enact a sale with such creepy ideas -
The body is normally sweet-smelling down to 2.0 [the lowest
non-abberated (sane) point on the Tone Scale] but begins to exude
chronically certain unpleasant effluvia from 2.0 down
Ex`ude´
v. t. 1. To discharge through pores or incisions, as moisture or other
liquid matter; to give out.
[imp. & p. p. Exuded; p. pr. & vb. n. exuding.]
Our forests exude turpentine in . . . abundance.
- Dr. T. Dwight.
v. i. 1. To flow from a body through the pores, or by a natural
discharge, as juice.
WordNet Dictionary
Verb 1. exude - release (a liquid) in drops or small quantities;
"exude sweat through the pores"
Synonyms: exudate, ooze out, transude, ooze
2. exude - make apparent by one's mood or behaviour; "She exude great
confidence"
Ooze -- not from tone - but toxins!
But if you don't have a tone to accompany oozing, you could use a
Color to describe the ooze to be a toxin!
Throw in a couple baseless altered, fraudulent reports and stories and
bingo - Colored towels
Color too, like sunburn trickery from niacin burn to show bad toxins.
Just a thought,
Feisty
>
> r
>
>
> >
>
>
Feisty
"RolandRB" <rolan...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:52970945.04081...@posting.google.com...
I'd bet that most of his research team was a group of one. That just
begs for a new cereal
beginning with "Capn."
Feisty
roger gonnet
"RolandRB" <rolan...@hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:52970945.04081...@posting.google.com...
I fear that his breath was mostly alcohol stinky.
r
Steve Whitlatch
"Feisty" <su...@skytoday.com> writes:
>> Who here smelled hubbard's breath?
>>
>> How bad was it?
>
>Enough for him to write about it? One guess!
>
> A PIECE OF BLUE SKY
>
> Scientology, Dianetics
> and L. Ron Hubbard Exposed
> by Jon Atack
>
> A LYLE STUART BOOK
> Published by Carol Publishing Group
>
>Copyright c 1990 by Jon Atack
>A Lyle Stuart Book
>Published by Carol Publishing Group
>
>40 INSIDE SCIENTOLOGY 1974 - 1983
>
>This is Rosenblum's description of Hubbard (she calls him "LRH"):
>
> He had long reddish-grayish hair down past his shoulders, rotting
> teeth, a really fat gut...He didn't look anything like his
> pictures....
Rotting teeth. His breath must of been putrid, like dead things,
a million sewers. Real uptone. Let's all send ron our power while
we stand here clapping at his picture. Shit, put him out of his
misery.
Feisty
"Zorrosblade........Z" <zorro...@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:o91hh099g6ubncl6p...@4ax.com...
> tongue.
>
> Some people use a spoon to manually scrape bacteria from their
tongues.
> Richter developed his own system, called ProFresh, which he sells on
the
> Internet. His system uses a tongue scraper to scratch off top layers
of
> bacteria and a chlorine dioxide rinse to kill the underneath
bacteria.
>
> Before you wage an all-out battle with the little tongue-dwellers,
Nice!
Well, in the spirit of completism, and without adding any further
articles, I acknowledge
you're scraping up of all bacteria-laced facts and numbers. (The
garlic was a refreshing addition.)
There is no doubt that numbers were perpetually coming out out of
Hubbards mouth. He was always devising so many schemes that included
stats, HCOPL numbers, percentages. Hubbard used numbers to sell; to
inflict ruin on dupes who have no arsonal of garlic to fend off the
overpowering assuage of encircling numbers.- give'em a number and
they'll give us a hefty number of dollars!
There are no gift horses in $cientology, and those with 20/20
hindsight are now of a definite advantage to be able to see the real
connection between Hubbards ill-rambling and his rotten flora for
numbers.
While his barking stinky numbers at people may have worked in a pinch
to readers minds, the findings just seem to have a way of ending up on
the junk food for thought science list. I couldn't imagine checksheets
for this sort of junk, but no doubt he could not find resources to
plagiarize.
Feisty
Barbara Schwarz
It's true, downtone people don't smell good. I noticed when people are
afraid, have fear, they stink especially. As the Scientology attacker
are all so low tone, it must be a terrible psych stench. What a luck
their smell can't be attached to the postings, otherwise ARS would
smell like a garbage can from hell.
But there is more to bad smells. Ron also said that psychs breed pus
infected germs and distribute those all over the planet. Those don't
smell good and everybody, lowtone or uptone can catch those and
infections.
However, it are the very lowtone and suppressive who breed them. A
person high on the tonescale would not even think of such a thing nor
would he breed the critters nor would he inject it in our water, air,
food, clothes, funitures, medicine, whatsoever.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara Schwarz
> In article <sTYRc.1985$FV3....@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com>,
> "Feisty" <su...@skytoday.com> writes:
>
> >People who have bad breath as they are
> >processed lose it when the are above 2.0 on the tone scale. People who
> >are temporarily suppressed below 2.0 commonly have bad breath.
>
>
> hubbard had bad teeth, no? I think I remember some pictures
> of hubbard with bad teeth.
>
> Who here smelled hubbards breath?
>
> How bad was it?
Ron's breath was very clean and good.
You saw pictures of Jack Marshall, the imposter. I bet he stank like a psych.
Barbara Schwarz