Has Tom Cruise been declared? It could be, here is why.
xenufrance
million. By instance, he was a founding platinium meritorious (not to be
confused with the Platinium excalibur, which are very new). He had paid $
2.5 million for the "title". Then on Impact 114 and 115, he was Diamond
Meritorious, that means he gave $ 5 million. Now he disappeared from the
lists.
There is no longer a mention of Cruise in IAS Mags 121 and 122, 2009.
Was he reimbursed? Is he the SP guy right now?
r
nonym
i think, hes keeping a low profile, with his UA production company
lost, to get his Knight and a Day into the cinemas w/o the scn-stigma.
a
Hartley Patterson
> There is no longer a mention of Cruise in IAS Mags 121 and 122, 2009.
The gossip mags said John Travolta told them he was sending a plane to
Haiti, but the daily CoS Press Releases have never mentioned him. Also odd.
--
"and the best part is that when they make it into
a movie, all of the stars can play themselves."
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm
"Rev" Norle Enturbulata DTS, PLC, OD, SPG
"Hartley Patterson" <hpt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.25c77ad69...@news.thundernews.com...
> xenuf...@free.fr wrote:
>
>> There is no longer a mention of Cruise in IAS Mags 121 and 122, 2009.
>
> The gossip mags said John Travolta told them he was sending a plane to
> Haiti, but the daily CoS Press Releases have never mentioned him. Also
> odd.
Never fails: It's always so much less work to tell the truth - One has so
much less to 'remember'. It may be a sign of the disintegration of
Scientology that such disorganized information handling is actually showing
these days. Frantic still-hardcore Scientologists trying to keep their own
version of stats up?
Richard Ford
earthligh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Hartley Patterson" <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:MPG.25c77ad69...@news.thundernews.com...
>
> > xenufra...@free.fr wrote:
>
> >> There is no longer a mention of Cruise in IAS Mags 121 and 122, 2009.
>
> > The gossip mags said John Travolta told them he was sending a plane to
> > Haiti, but the daily CoS Press Releases have never mentioned him. Also
> > odd.
>
> Never fails: It's always so much less work to tell the truth - One has so
> much less to 'remember'. It may be a sign of the disintegration of
> Scientology that such disorganized information handling is actually showing
> these days. Frantic still-hardcore Scientologists trying to keep their own
> version of stats up?
>
>
>
> > --
> > "and the best part is that when they make it into
> > a movie, all of the stars can play themselves."
>
> - Show quoted text -
Maybe it is an example of 'slappy' paranoia. DM wants to be the face
of scientology and does not want to build up any potential rival in
the event of a power struggle.
We must also remember that both celebrities are loose cannon. TC lost
interest in the cult for some time while JT made freezone like
comments in the past. The defection of either could destroy the cult
so DM is probably easing them out in advance. The position of DM is
more important to him than the future of scientology.
I cannot see the cult making a public declare however.
Hartley Patterson
> We must also remember that both celebrities are loose cannon. TC lost
> interest in the cult for some time while JT made freezone like
> comments in the past.
Breaking news: Travolta is flying his 707 across to Haiti with doctors and
VMs, according to news reports. He can't stay - nothing odd about that,
there is no parking space at the airport. The VM blog has this news.
See
http://www.artistsforpeaceandjustice.com/news.html
for a Jan 23 report from Paul Haggis.
--
FREEDOM is a trademark owned by
Religious Technology Center
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm
DamOTclese
>There is no longer a mention of Cruise in IAS Mags 121 and 122, 2009.
>Was he reimbursed? Is he the SP guy right now?
No, Mapother wasn't thrown out of the company since he was tagged
for millions of dollars to send Scientology sales crooks to Haiti.
Had he been thrown out, it's unlikely that Miscaviage or any of the
other crime bosses would order him to pony up whatever money he's
got left to fund PR and sales efforts in Haiti.
---
Does belief in astrology cause insanity? http://www.skeptictank.org/edm.htm
First thing I do before starting any project is whack my thumb with a
sledge hammer and just get it out? of the way. -- Mobiltec
"Rev" Norle Enturbulata DTS, PLC, OD, SPG
"Hartley Patterson" <hpt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:MPG.25c88839f...@news.thundernews.com...
> doorma...@googlemail.com wrote:
>
>> We must also remember that both celebrities are loose cannon. TC lost
>> interest in the cult for some time while JT made freezone like
>> comments in the past.
>
> Breaking news: Travolta is flying his 707 across to Haiti with doctors and
> VMs, according to news reports. He can't stay - nothing odd about that,
> there is no parking space at the airport. The VM blog has this news.
Alas, Sky News last night showed a still photo of JT and his wife sticking
their heads out the window of the cockpit, and stock footage of JT while the
voiceover says something about "several tons of supplies", "doctors" and
"Scientology Ministers", last night in the Headlines section, but not this
morning.
Out_Of_The_Dark
He has a new publicist, lol. Probably told him that all Scn related
news must go.
Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman Now Have Same Publicist | The Hollywood
Reporter | Showbiz 411 | Entertainment News
Tom Cruise, Nicole Kidman Now Have Same Publicist
By: Roger Friedman // Friday January 29, 2010
Ex spouses Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman now, oddly, have the same
publicist: 42 West, formerly the Dart Group. It’s a company started by
Leslee Dart, the dynamic ex-partner of Lois Smith and Pat Kingsley of
PMK fame.
If only the bloggers who huff and puff on subjects about which they
know very little had stopped to think about Cruise’s defection to 42
West from Rogers & Cowan they would have realized this. Kidman moved
to 42 West from PMK-HBH over a year ago. She is personally repped by
Leslee Dart.
Cruise will be handled by the firm’s Amanda Lundberg, who handled the
press for the god-awful “Valkyrie” and was the head of PR for Miramax
in its heyday. Lundberg and her team are great but she’s not a miracle
worker. “Valkyrie” remains a cinematic embarrassment.
Cruise was not handled for some time at Rogers & Cowan by Arnold
Robinson or Paul Bloch, contrary to blog reports. Robinson let go of
the account a long time ago to work on other clients. Bloch, a wise
and gentle man who is beloved, also focuses on John Travolta and
others. I am told that everyone at R&C was surprised to learn of
Cruise’s defection. I was, too. I’ll tell you why. [..]
see link for Friedman's reasons
http://showbiz411.blogs.thr.com/2010/01/29/tom-cruise-nicole-kidman-now-have-same-publicist/