RPF: historical data and present info
Kevin Brady
stories about the RPF, and links to more information. I encourage anyone
who has not written to me yet concerning this to do so, as I believe the
document I am putting together will be better, depending on the number of
viewpoints and stories I can be quoting from.
--
Kevin G. Brady
tabula_...@hotmail.com
Michael Gebert
<tabula_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to thank all of you who have been writing to me with your
> stories about the RPF, and links to more information. I encourage anyone
> who has not written to me yet concerning this to do so, as I believe the
> document I am putting together will be better, depending on the number of
> viewpoints and stories I can be quoting from.
Despite the fact that you have no right to do that.
___________________________________________________
Michael Gebert, Writer | www.michaelgebert.com
"Look where you will, in every high place there sits an Ass, settled
beyond the reach of all the greatest intellects in this world to pull him
down. Over our whole social system, complacent Imbecility rules
supreme -- snuffs out the searching light of Intelligence with total
impunity -- and hoots, owl-like, in answer to every form of protest,
See how well we all do in the dark! One of these days that audacious
assertion will be practically contradicted, and the whole rotten system
of modern society will come down with a crash."
--Wilkie Collins, on the Bush energy policy, in No Name (pub. 1862)
Kevin Brady
news:3b6a44cc...@nntp.lightlink.com...
> "Kevin Brady" <tabula_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >I would like to thank all of you who have been writing to me with your
> >stories about the RPF, and links to more information. I encourage anyone
> >who has not written to me yet concerning this to do so, as I believe the
> >document I am putting together will be better, depending on the number of
> >viewpoints and stories I can be quoting from.
>
I will, then! Thanks!
> She describes how
> your great leader El Blubbard
whose great leader?
> personally locked her up in the bilge.
I will certainly need to include that in my paper, if it was connected to
the RPF, although I am hoping for really recent data, too.
> What a great humanitarian and benefactor of mankind, eh?
Umm... sure, if you say so.
kgb
Kevin Brady
news:mike-31070...@user-33qt9fq.dialup.mindspring.com...
> In article <llH97.61010$d26.5...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com>, "Kevin Brady"
> <tabula_...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to thank all of you who have been writing to me with your
> > stories about the RPF, and links to more information. I encourage
anyone
> > who has not written to me yet concerning this to do so, as I believe the
> > document I am putting together will be better, depending on the number
of
> > viewpoints and stories I can be quoting from.
>
> Despite the fact that you have no right to do that.
Right. In spite of the restrictions place on me by Phil Chitester, I will
investigate whatever I wish.
kgb
Phil Chitester
> I would like to thank all of you who have been writing to me with your
> stories about the RPF, and links to more information. I encourage anyone
> who has not written to me yet concerning this to do so, as I believe the
> document I am putting together will be better, depending on the number of
> viewpoints and stories I can be quoting from.
Yeah, thanks to all you traitors and deserters of mankind for contributing to
yet another smear campaign aborning (at least in Kevin's teenie little
psychotic mind) against my altruistic-in-the-extreme Church. You know which
one it is. Not the one you belong to. At least anymore.
Big flunk. This will go on all your records. But you KNOW *that*!
Phil
Kevin Brady
news:3B6758A6...@yahoo.com...
> Kevin Brady wrote:
>
> > I would like to thank all of you who have been writing to me with your
> > stories about the RPF, and links to more information. I encourage
anyone
> > who has not written to me yet concerning this to do so, as I believe the
> > document I am putting together will be better, depending on the number
of
> > viewpoints and stories I can be quoting from.
>
> Yeah, thanks to all you traitors and deserters of mankind for contributing
to
> yet another smear campaign aborning (at least in Kevin's teenie little
> psychotic mind) against my altruistic-in-the-extreme Church.
Extreme is right.
> You know which
> one it is. Not the one you belong to. At least anymore.
And that is why they are free today!
> Big flunk. This will go on all your records. But you KNOW *that*!
Yeah, if you say so.
kgb
Neil
Neil
Neil
Neil
Kevin Brady
news:svnemtkmdl8s5feg5...@4ax.com...
> Why in the world would he not have the right to gather information?
It was a joke. Phil Chitester insists that noone has a right to investigate
the RPF. Mike was just busting his balls.
kgb
Magoo
Hi...
Although I was never put in the RPF>>>>having been in Scientology for 30
years, I saw and heard of it often.
Here are a few things that stick in my mind:
In the early days, 1980's, I heard quiet rumors of the RPF and the RPF's
RPF.
It was sort of a torture chamber, from what I heard....based on "standard
tech" if you will.
Often in the "old days' you would see the "RPFers" out cleaning, chipping
paint, painting etc.
They wore black uniforms and arm bands and had to run all the time. It was
almost a "don't ask, don't tell" sort of atmosphere.
Of course it was promoted that these were people who had committed SO many
"overts" or bad deeds that they had to be removed from post, and corrected.
Since they didn't have a ship (*where Hubbard supposedly designed the RPF)
they were made to do handy work on the buidings around the Complex.
I had heard they got very little sleep, and ate rice and beans, if that.
At Flag I saw them working out in the parking lot and there is where I heard
of the RPF's RPF where supposedly people had been chained up. I didn't
believe it....but of course have since learned it was true.
It is amazing to me to even write this and think I walked by these people
daily and just figured it WAS what they needed. How brain washed is that???
In the late 80's they had a whole different PR line. They told us the RPF
had been fully revised and was now TRULY to help staff.
I was told by Sharon Runyon (Exec in RPR==Ron's Public Relations office)
that people were sent to the RPF to co=audit and handle their cases. They
had to do some "mest" work (physical) but the rest was co=auditing. Soon
after she was ordered to the RPF.
So that's my little story about the RPF.
I am happy you are getting lots of good imput. Stephen Kent wrote a whole
book on the RPF which has very detailed info in it.
My best to you :)
Tory/Magoo~
"Kevin Brady" <tabula_...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:llH97.61010$d26.5...@news1.wwck1.ri.home.com...
Richard Gozinya
Question: Are you a complete troll, or do you actually believe the shit you
write?
Phil Chitester
Can you spice that up and make it sound about 10 times more cruel/horrible and
inhumane and stuff? It's much too nice sounding for anyone to buy that the RPF
is *really bad*, which is what we're after here.
Kevin needs that you know. He's obsessing right now and drooling with
anticipation.
Hey, it doesn't matter if you lie or distort facts or fabricate. That's
*allowed* you know. That's part of our training here. Oh, and forget about
direct observation. We don't need to stop there. We can just fantasize too.
I'm getting a sexual thrill just thinking about it.
Isn't this great? We get to slander a Church and stuff.
Phil
Michael Gebert
<dpchi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Hey, it doesn't matter if you lie or distort facts or fabricate. That's
> *allowed* you know. That's part of our training here. Oh, and forget about
> direct observation.
All people do is throw direct observations at you and you dismiss them as
lies because they're inconvenient for your simplistic worldview. Why
should anyone even bother talking to you?
Why are you here?
Bo
<dpchi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Magoo wrote:
>
>> Kevin,
>> Hi...
>>
[snipped - Kevin's story about the RPF]
>
[snipped - Phil's story about Kevin's story]
>
>Isn't this great? We get to slander a Church and stuff.
>
Whaddayamean?
Which church?
--
Bo
Phil Chitester
> In article <3B680F6D...@yahoo.com>, Phil Chitester
> <dpchi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey, it doesn't matter if you lie or distort facts or fabricate. That's
> > *allowed* you know. That's part of our training here. Oh, and forget about
> > direct observation.
>
> All people do is throw direct observations at you and you dismiss them as
> lies because they're inconvenient for your simplistic worldview.
That's simplistic, dogmatic, low-life, scummy, self-right, know-best worldview to
you.
They can appear to be accurate reports of direct observations, but I see that due
apparently to the sources' motives involved, they have left out the good aspects
of the scene they are reporting about. I come to that conclusion because I've
seen some of the things reported on and it strikes me as unusual that I saw it
completely differently and so have my friends, not just because we're different
people than the reporter. In other words, me and my friends can detect untruth
and slander in the reports and are not interested in letting that pass unreported
itself, if it presents an opportunity to disrupt, disturb and confuse the
readership on a.r.s. at all. I guess, what I'm saying is, we don't particularly
like you people messing with our religion. Hehe.
> Why should anyone even bother talking to you?
It may interest some to know observations from a possibly less biased viewpoint,
one which has less of an axe to grind. Or, perhaps, even just someone who has had
a different set of experiences from the others. Or it may interest some to hear
from someone who appears to be a brain-washed low-life, mind-controlled vegetable
(for contrast with the professional types on here) who never had any success,
really, in Scientology or in life, who resents highly the actions of a few
Scientologists (who would be dead, but for The Way to Happiness precept, good
going Ron), but who thinks he knows a lot about it (knows-best) and doesn't know
any better than to try and controvert everyone else's data here on a.r.s. (it
doesn't matter who's) in direct violation of his Church's policies re
parishioners' actions.
Besides I'm one of the only Scientologists who's an El Queso fan. From way back
on the track, too. Paging Dr. Paloma. Will you confront?
Bwahahahhahahaahahahaha!
> Why are you here?
To screw with the dark forces of evil and hopeful buy off the Scientology
management personnel who are on my back, who have at times (not many) wanted me
dead, in the hopes that someday I could maybe get some confessional auditing so
that I would stop killing little animals (joke), upsetting everyone who comes into
contact with me (practically), and maybe get off this planet, too, someday (for
real).
I'm going for that serene state of beingness.
Phil
quentin hubbard
I'd put you at 1.1 on the tone scale.
Sorry to evaluate but hey THIS IS THE REAL WORLD.
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 08:17:17 -0600, Phil Chitester
<dpchi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I.S.Rennie
have ever seen.
lame.
Magoo
Magoo
You know Phil...you are one sick puppie.
I honestly told what I observed. I could have told one hell of a lot more. I
have security checked some people who had some ****Really**** juicy
tales.....but I don't believe in going into that.
Even by my own observation, yes.,,,,sure,,,,,I can make it sound a HELL of a
lot worse than I did. I left out all the adjectives like "starving to death"
..."slave camps" ....and
"spirtual rape"....
Would you like me to continue/????
I think YOU should do a stint on the RPF>>>>
and THEN come tell us about it.
MEantime...you're just one more OSA bot,,,too scared to look at the truth.
Be careful.....we *might* get to ya.
Tory/Magoo~dancin in the moonlight~
>
Magoo
"Bo" <nob...@online.com> wrote in message
news:3b68643...@news.online.no...
And which guy?
:0
T
>
>
> --
> Bo
>
Magoo
T
"I.S.Rennie" <LIP0...@sheffield.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:3B695082...@sheffield.ac.uk...