What's Barbara PsychoSchwarz going to do when she.......
Still_lying_about_Marty
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
Barbara Schwarz
> is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
Foregoing posting was not made by me, Barbara Schwarz, but by lawless
Garry Lynn Scarff, a forger, identity stealer, hate crime committer,
persecutor, cyber stalker, notorious liar, harasser, and sexual
harasser. He verbally assaults me, abuses me and deliberately libels
me and misinforms people about me. He violates my privacy and my
security by over and over posting my home address on the net. He
steals my identity and posts offensive, libelous and obscene postings
under my name or with my name in his e-mail address. Note that I post
from Utah, he from California.
Nobody will ban me from the library computers, as I don't do anything
illegal or wrong, but I want to know where Garry Scarff is posting
from when he is in prison. But if the library would have to close down
through a natural disaster or an act of violence, I would post from
the U of U or community center computer labs. I recently posted last
Friday from the U of U. They have hundreds of computers available, and
they don't even have a time limit as in the library.
Scarff is also a fanatical fan of the porn and bomb instruction guy
Dave Touretzky and defends David Touretzky's wrong ways.
Above posting is not by Barbara Schwarz. It is one of the many
forgeries of criminal and identity stealer Garry Scarff. I post from
Utah, he posts from California. His postings are criminal,
unintelligent and vulgar, mine none. It is a sign that the "justice
system" doesn't work as this criminal still roams free and continues
new crimes. He also lied under oath and is a perjurer.
I,Barbara Schwarz, swear under oath and penality of perjury that I
never stole anybody's identity nor did I ever forge a posting or any
other document. Scarff libels me as he thinks that he comes away with
it as in his eyes I am a rightless person.
GARRY SCARFF IN HIS OWN DANGEROUS:
"Actually, she (Barbara Schwarz) needs a baseball bat right in the
kisser.
"Better yet, Bob, why don't you fetch an armload of really heavy books
and walk over to Barbara (Schwarz) when she's at a computer and
whoops....accidentially trip and drop the books on her head...hell..."
"You're very lucky there's 2000 miles between us, Beebe. You'd either
be dead or in ICU."
Garry Scarff: "Yup! I AM SATAN, HEAR ME ROAR!"
Garry Scarff: "...my college grades dropped and I was suspended for 6
months from college for receiving one credit out of the required 12
for the term."
Garry Scarff: "D.E. and others are correct if that I have not been a
Scientologist..."
Garry Scarff: "I was 'friend' with Scientology, yet going to cult
education forums with the Greeks and trashing Scientology."
Garry Scarff: "I...was even invited as special friend by Ann Greek to
accompany them to Canada for the purposes of kidnapping their
daughter...I accompanied the Greeks and another deprogrammer, Diane
Benscoter to Candada but the effort was unsuccessful."
Garry Scarff: "The sexual incident involving deprogrammer Bob
Brandybury did occur though Anne Greek begged me not to report it as a
crime."
Garry Scarff: "I rather lick you."
Garry Scarff:" Have a short life, Zanebutt".
Garry Scarff: "Don't make me send my henchman back over there to
bloody your nose."
------------------
GARRY SCARFF, THE THIEF OF FUNDS:
Garry Scarff stole stole 70% of donations of the Positive Action
Center. Something tells me that he did not do that out of hunger but
because he has a criminal mind.
GARRY SCARFF, AND THE MISUSE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EQUIPMENT:
The affidavit of lawyer Graham Berry of April 4, 2004 indicates that
Garry Scarff unlawfully used law enforcement computer network to
retrieve info about juvenile. My question, is there any crime that
this Scarff has not committed sofar? He should be locked up.
GARRY SCARFF, THE PERJURER:
There are numerous information on the net that Garry Scarff lied in
his deposition in the Fishman/Geertz case.
Saying the truth under oath means nothing to criminal Scarff.
MORE GARRY SCARFF PERJURY:
Garry Scarff recants the content of his declarations given to Michael
Rinder, Elliott Abelson and David Long during the July 4, 1997
weekend. (A court accepting an affidavit of notorious liar Scarff is
losing all credibility.)
GARRY SCARFF, COMFORTABLE WITH LYING TO OTHERS FOR A LIVING:
C. Brennan wrote: "You forgot to mention that Garry Scarff is the guy
that used to be paid by the Cult Awareness Network to lie to potential
money sources for CAN and tell them his poor daddy died in Jonestown
(he said it used to bring tears to people's eyes,and green out of
people's pocketbooks, I guess he was convincing). Only problem was his
father was alive and well and living in Florida. CAN toured him all
over the country telling that story for quite a while, I guess they
got some good mileage out of it. It seems that Gary's comfortable with
lying to others for a living, don't know who is paying him now."
GARRY SCARFF, THE VIOLENT MAN
Violent Garry Scarff about an missed opportunity to have him arrested:
"My heated emotions to one female counterpicketer gave away and I
grabbed her by the throat and flung her to the ground in full view of
a Scientologist with a rolling videocamera."
MORE ABOUT GARRY SCARFF, THE DEATH THREAT MAKER:
His apology was simply part of the usual Scarff cycle. Still "valid"
is also his promise to kill me. -- T. H.
...but I see he (Garry Scarff) has progressed to making death threats
against me in a desperate plea for my attention. Something about
shooting me in the head? Someone e-mailed it to me; I missed the
posted thread. -- M.H.
And yeah, I know you (Garry Scarff) are dangerous...I know you can
easily mock up being really insane and take me out with your insanity
defense all nicely in place. -- G.A.
I would suggest to those who know Garry in LA that you should be
careful...So my advice to everyone: never never never never tell Garry
Scarff anything.... Remember, that is what drives his sick mind - he
wants to be known, looked at and to be listened to. -- T.H.
You are a liar, Garry. We have met. -- W.
Garry Scarff is a know liar. -- L .F.
I believe that Scarff did not just know about the sexual abuse of the
kidnap victim but that he participated in the abuse. -- Barbara
Schwarz
Scarff worked for both sides and cried, when he was caught. -- T.H.
GARRY SCARFF, AND INSANITY THAT RUNS IN HIS FAMILY?
Garry's brother allegedly killed himself with a gun.
I just believe that Garry has nothing to do with that if he has an
fool proof alibi that he was not near his brother at that time.
ROLL OVER FATHER JOHN GEOGHAN, HERE COMES GARRY SCARFF:
I learned that the Catholic Church did not take godless gay Garry
Scarff, who wanted to become a catholic "priest". Knowing Scarff, the
only reason why he would have wanted to join is because of the
homosexual activities of that church. That is likely the only reason
he became member in WEHO, his gay pick up "church" place in which they
drug and rape according to WEHO ex-members.
I thought the Catholic Church hires just about any perverted creep.
Scarff is apparently so perverted that even that church does not want
him. If they would have, who knows how many little boys rightfully
would sue father Scarff.
GARRY SCARFF, THE SPY:
Scarff:" I lied to F. and feigned an emotional outburst complete with
tears, screaming... The ploy worked as F. apologized to me... I
availed myself to his aonfidential (sic) legal records and legal files
of his clients..."
GARRY SCARFF, and his questionable diet: "Agreed that the Mormon when
(sic) look like they belong on a dairy farm, but some of the young
missionaries are yummy!"
MORE COMPLAINTS BY OTHERS ABOUT GARRY SCARFF:
Graham has his own ass to cover since Scarff gave him reams of other
false statements about alleged murder plots and so on...Berry will
have serious problems trying to make Scarff's former statements under
oath old up. -- H.C.
Garry Scarff deliberately lied about his background while he was an
active member of CAN. He claimed his father and other family members
were killed in Jonestown -- when he actually didn't know anyone in
Jonestown or have any involvement with the People's Temple. He served
as CAN's poster boy for awhile, all based on his fabricated
experiences with Jim Jones. After CAN was embarrassed by Scarff's lies
and turned against him, Scarff then proceeded to claim he had
infiltrated CAN as a GO/OSA operative. Outside of Scarff's own
assertions, I've seen no indication that this is any more true than
his lies about his
Jonestown connections. Scarff told the Moonies that CAN was making
death threats to try to keep him quiet. Scarff told the Moonies that,
as a member of CAN, he had been involved in activities that included
theft and burglary against them.
This is the guy whose "sworn affidavits" many people use to "prove"
that the CoS is a criminal organization. We're taking Scarff's
unsubstantiated word for things like the drowning of Judge
Swearinger's dog Duke, Moxon's order to have Cynthia Kisser and her
mythical daughter killed, etc. Is it really wise for anyone to place
so much trust in Scarff's unsubstantiated accusations?
Now, thanks to Scarff himself, we learn that he didn't end his career
as a prevaricator when he lost his contact with CAN and various cults.
He attempted to scam the Roman Catholic Church out of a settlement for
what he himself admits was a bogus claim that he was sexually
harrassed by a Catholic bishop. -- D. R.
It is well known that Garry Scarff can't be trusted...Garry is not
worthy of our trust. -- H.C.R.
Garry Scarff has been caught in lies and deceipt time and time again.
I only wish I could post half of the stuff which clearly shows the
misery that Scarff brought to lots of people. -- J.B.
Garry Scarff is a psychopath, and a loony is not an adequate word to
describe him. Scarff is a danger not only to himself, but to anyone
who trust him too... -- T.H.
For your information, when Garry (Scarff) was with CAN he was telling
everyone that his family had died in Jonestown and was making these
statements to the media. Come to find out, it was not true in the
slightest. If the alleged murder plots were true why didn't he go to
the police? -- H.C.
Perhaps you forget about the numerous little con-games he's been
caught playing here? I continue to spit in his (Scarff's) direction.
-- Z.T.
Garry Scarff is not a Scientology victim, he is a mentally ill guy...
-- T.H.
Is this guy (Garry Scarff) for real or does he just need to lay off
the hemp? Sounds like he's suffering from the Reality Inversion as
Robert Vaughn Young. -- T.J.
He (Scarff) has admitted to the things he has done and said, and he
has admitted being unstable. --J.B.
Have you ever seen Garry Scarff apologize for his deprogramming
activities here, or anything else for that matter? -- D. R.
Garry's mental problem is that he cannot accept people contradicting
him. -- T. H.
Scarff has already underminded any use he has in litigation for either
side because he lied so much. -- H.C.
And now you've become a forger as well. Go ahead Garry, and forge hate
messages. Go ahead, lie all you want. Go ahead and be cruel. Go ahead
and deny that your're doing what you're doing. -- G.A.
You (Garry Scarff) surface with your attacks and pornographic postings
and each time that you do I will release more info on you, who Lynn
Garrett really is, how Lynn Garrett makes his living, how Garry Scarff
became Lynn Garrett, vice versa. How Garry Scarff has accused at least
six individuals of homosexual attacks. -- J.B.
All I can say is that Scarff -- and the conflicting declarations he's
made in the past -- is what led me to become very skeptical of
anyone's claim of past abuse from cults, whether they've been sworn to
under penality or not. There may be some people willing to pick and
choose from Scarff's statement, selecting what they wish to beleive
and labelling as lies anything they don't wish to believe. I tend to
think that anyone so willing to change sides so often, for whatecver
reason, has list all hope of credibility. -- D. R.
I am a 100 percent convinced that no Scientologist told infiltrator
Garry Scarff to kill people, but that is all a product of this
criminal and mentally retarded mind. -- Barbara Schwarz
BTW, for those who don't know Garry Scarff, he is a pathological
liar...Garry lies continually about the "celebrities" he encounters.
He pretended to be a Jonestown survivor. -- G.A.
I have Scarff killfiled and so I don't see_his_posts, dear whatever.
-- Z.
And auto-attack drones like Garry Scarff, whose only learned skills
seem to
be anonymous posts, hiding behind spam merchants, and selling critics'
email
addresses to kiddy-porn sites. -- S.G.
Placing him (Scarff) in a killfile as probably 100 ars regulars have
done. Anyway, ars sure is a different place without him hanging
around. Must say I like it. :) *No one* makes as much noise as this
deseased creep... -- M.H.
FACTNet's archives include Garry Scarff's deposition revealing what he
claimed was a meeting with Moxon, Ingram, and others in which he swore
under penalty of perjury that all sorts of nefarious and illegal
schemes were plotted. FACTNet never reveals Garry Scarff's incredibly
checkered past history of flip-flopping between the battling cultists
and anticultists, or his ready admission that he's fabricated stories
from whole cloth (like his parents' death at Jonestown) in the past.
In Scarff's case, it wasn't just OSA who tried to warn readers about
Scarff's lack of credibility. -- D. R.
Scarff is active member of the gay WeHo "church", that according to
Scarff applaudes Scarff's lawless behavior against me. An ex-WeHo
member wrote me that this "church" sanctions and promotes dishonorable
behavior and that he and his friends were raped and drugged by one of
their active members, and that one of their active members murdered
others under the guise of "drug overdose". The ex-WeHo wrote that the
gay men make sexual innuendo during sermon and "church" leadership, as
their "Pastor" Terry Brewer, doesn't see what's wrong with that.
All that and more is documented on the Internet. You can go to the
Google newsgroups and check yourself. He posts with
dickto...@mindless.com (Dicktop_Stud); with Papa Boner; with
Barbara Schwarz is a notorious psychotic liar, an identity stealer, an
ugly cow, and a disgrace to the human race
(Boobara...@emailaccount.com); with with e-mail address
Barbara...@emailaccount.com and identities "Barbara_Schwarz";
"the real Barbara Schwarz de Rothschild"; "Truth Speaker 2"; and with
ID Still_lying_about_Marty. None of those posting is by me, the real
Barbara Schwarz, nor do I post under Babbling.Barbara.Schwarz and
e-mail address theonewhoisadelu...@emailaccount.com. I
posted first with ID "Guess who"? and e-mail account
theonewhoshallnotspeakout@emailaccount untill he stole again my
identity and posts now also with identity "Guess who" and with e-mail
account "theonewhoisadelusionalliar". He also stole the identity of
Mark Rathbun or Marty Rathbun (mrat...@scientology.org). Garry
Scarff's sexual harassment, insults, libel, persecution, harassment,
abuse, threats and cyber stalking of me, Barbara Schwarz, are under
different Google identities on the net. Scarff uses e-mail accounts
and posting identities with my name in it or a name similar as my name
to commit those crimes against me, but they can be all traced to him.
Interesting however is that he did not want to state his own address
to a court as he was afraid that he could himself come to harm. If he
fears criminality by not even tell the court where he lives, how come
he posts over and over my address on the net and lies that people
would get sexual services at my address and that there is a Hitler fan
club at my address? Scarff persecutes me from usenet thread to thread
often using my name as identity for his crimes (!) and verbally
assaults me, threatens me, harasses me, sexually harasses me, tries to
intimidate me, libels, insults and lies about me. He furthermore lied
that he spoke to a roommate of mine in the Utah mental health
hospital. I never was in that hospital, but he probably escaped from
one.
Scarff is the ultimate lawless and dangerous scum and police needs to
arrest him and lock him up.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara Schwarz
> Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) writes:
>
> >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>
> Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkis9z...@fnord.io.com>...
> Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) writes:
>
> >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>
> Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
What are you trying to suggest, Patrick Lee Humphrey, that Garry
Scarff shall kill and exteriorize me?
Faxhor discovered that stalked somebody and lost your job at Rice
university. Who did you stalk and why? Must have been quite serious
when you lost your job. Could not just been a few unwanted phone calls
to a girlfriend that dumped you for understandable reasons.
Speaking about stalkings and another stalker If somebody would have
told me 20 years ago that I am stalked on the Internet and otherwise
by a fanatical anti-religious gay creep like Garry Scarff, I would
have not believed it.
He needs to get a life. If he does not know want to do with his spare
time, he could help the homeless; he could mow the lawn for old
people; could volunteer in his community; could pick up the litter
from the street; could plant trees and flowers; could clean his
apartment; could vaccum clean the red carpet from the Emmys; could sew
an overall for Dave Bird (he does not do well with slacks and belts);
could catch the fleas off Dave Rice hairy back and nose hair; could
hold Tory Christman's hand while her horns and tail gets surgically
removed; could carry Peaches cat's litter to the garbage; could
collect clothes for Gerry Armstrong; (who has not enough to wear but
an uncomfortable globe), could stroll Ida in her wheelchair through
the park and read to her stories about good mothers; could make sure
that Robert Clark learns rather to hack in a piano than in
governmental computer systems; could make sure that Barb Graham don't
thinks he is a lizard when she goes out; could make sure that Phil
Georgi pays his child support; could make sure that Keith Henson
surrenders to the law enforcement authorities; could make sure that
Mike Krotz gives up his obsession with toilets and don't drives in
people; could make sure that Roger Gonnet learns about what the Nazis
did and how they made the French to their poodles; could teach Arnie
Lerma about that Nazis are no good friends; could help Joe Lynn to
approach women of his own age; could warn sad people about Karin
Spaink; could get some decency and free speech for others into porn
and bomb instruction master Dave Touretzky; and for all I care could
paint gay pictures with Michael Pattinson to gay music.
There is a lot that Garry Scarff could do, and it would be all better
than stealing my identity, posting my home address constantly to
harass me and violate my privacy, endanger my security, preeching
violence against me, trying to bad mouth me in my neighborhood and to
otherwise maliciously defame me.
He really needs to get a life. A decent and law abiding one for a
change. And that goes for you too, Humphrey, Dumbphrey.
Barbara Schwarz
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkis9z...@fnord.io.com>...
>> Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) writes:
>> >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>> Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
>What are you trying to suggest, Patrick Lee Humphrey, that Garry
>Scarff shall kill and exteriorize me?
No, since you *are* an OT, aren't you, you brain-damaged Hubbardfellater?
>Faxhor discovered that stalked somebody and lost your job at Rice
>university.
FaxWhore is a Scientologist, and he's lying. I didn't stalk anyone. I sure
pissed off a few net kooks, though. That wasn't what led to my dismissal,
though. Use your alleged powers and find out for yourself. *snicker*
>Who did you stalk and why? Must have been quite serious when you lost your
>job.
I didn't stalk anyone. For an OT, you're one *stupid* bag lady.
>Could not just been a few unwanted phone calls to a girlfriend that dumped
>you for understandable reasons.
*laugh*
My wife and I had only been together for almost fourteen years by that time --
and we're still together. So much for your alleged OT "powers", Schwantz.
[the rest of Boobs' psychotic episode, deleted]
Stefano MacGregor
> Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) wrote in message news:<19b9f902.04092...@posting.google.com>...
> > is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>
> Foregoing posting was not made by me, Barbara Schwarz, but by lawless
> Garry Lynn Scarff, ...
So, are you claiming to be the =real= "Still_lying_about_Marty"? What
kind of messages have you posted under that name?
--
Stefano
Faxhor
"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
to lower your standards even more."
- Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
================================================================
Theres more:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=xYPB4.849%244a.31970%40pm01news.wcom.com
And more:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=patrick+humphrey+stalker&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8
Faxhor
Dicktop_Stud
> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkis9z...@fnord.io.com>...
> > Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) writes:
> >
> > >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
> >
> > Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
>
> What are you trying to suggest, Patrick Lee Humphrey, that Garry
> Scarff shall kill and exteriorize me?
LOL. Now, why would I want to kill you, PsychoBoob? With you gone,
there you would be no one here to laugh at.
>
> Faxhor discovered that stalked somebody and lost your job at Rice
> university. Who did you stalk and why? Must have been quite serious
> when you lost your job. Could not just been a few unwanted phone calls
> to a girlfriend that dumped you for understandable reasons.
Blah...blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..blah...blah..
- Ramblings of the ARS Psychopath
>
> Speaking about stalkings and another stalker If somebody would have
> told me 20 years ago that I am stalked on the Internet and otherwise
> by a fanatical anti-religious gay creep like Garry Scarff, I would
> have not believed it.
Stop stalking me, PsychoticBoob.
>
> He really needs to get a life. A decent and law abiding one for a
> change. And that goes for you too, Humphrey, Dumbphrey.
Take your meds, Boob. You're having another psychotic episode.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>================================================================
>"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
> You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
> to lower your standards even more."
> - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
>================================================================
Looks like I've got another brain-dead anonymous-coward Scientologist trying
to shudder me into silence...flash on this, Hubbardfellater: it didn't work
nine years ago, and it still won't work now. (I was wondering how long it'd
take the Cult of Clams to finally add me to their Religious Hate Watch
pantheon, despite the fact I've never been part of the galloping fraud that
represents itself as the "Church" of Scientology.)
Barbara Schwarz
> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>
> >================================================================
> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
> > to lower your standards even more."
> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
> >================================================================
Well, Faxhor got to your crimes, Patrick Lee Humphrey, and you don't
take it like a reformed man, but like a stalker.
"Though Rice University has sent me a letter of apology for the
actions
of Mr. Humphrey and Rice Legal Department no longer allows him to use
his employee account as a base for his stalking, he now uses a paid
service to carry on his pyschotic obsession with me. As most anything
goes with ISPs, it leaves me few options to deal with this little
netscab. As literally thousands of liberals have been intimitated out
of the political newsgroups because of this onerous game, I am going
to fight it." (Read more in below posting of Rack.)
Barbara Schwarz
From: rack...@worldnet.att.net (Rack Jite)
Subject: PATRICK HUMPHREY - HOUSTON, LOONEYTARIAN STALKER
Date: 1997/11/22
Message-ID: <655a8f$b...@mtinsc04.worldnet.att.net>
References: <3334A7...@cei.net> <kjdfd9
<5ie2bu$j81$1...@nntp1.ba.best.com> <5iegac$1k...@sol.caps.maine.edu>
<kjdb431...@news.tamu.edu> <szkwwqc...@pentagon.io.com>
<335221bd...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
<33518cc5...@netnews2.worldnet.att.net>
Organization: Conservatively Incorrect
Reply-To: rack...@worldnet.att.net
Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.libertarian,talk.abortion,houston.general
Understand the purpose here. For 14 years this abject loser has been
following me around to every BBS and network I have been on doing
little else than squealing what my name may be and where I may live.
It is a probably the most classic case on the net of invasion of
privacy and cyberspace stalking which has lead to him physically
stalk me at home.
Mr. Humphrey refuses to stop under any condition. Recently I
unilaterally stated that I would remove his name from my website, and
make no mention of him anywhere at all to see if he would reciprocate,
stop this battle and prove to everyone he is not the stalker I claim
him to be. The day after I publicly posted that message, he was
replying to my issue oriented messages including what he presumes my
name and where I live, and has proceeded to do so over the two weeks
since. Probably the defining factor of a stalker is their inability to
stop it.
Though Rice University has sent me a letter of apology for the actions
of Mr. Humphrey and Rice Legal Department no longer allows him to use
his employee account as a base for his stalking, he now uses a paid
service to carry on his pyschotic obsession with me. As most anything
goes with ISPs, it leaves me few options to deal with this little
netscab. As literally thousands of liberals have been intimitated out
of the political newsgroups because of this onerous game, I am going
to fight it.
Note that these few quotes below are only about .01% of the totality
of the crap this Squealing little stalker has been so proudly posting
for what he readily admits is FOURTEEN YEARS.
I know this is irritating to many of you, but it is the only way I
have of fighting back. This issue of privacy is the central issue of
the net. All he has to do is stop and I will never address, mention or
think about him ever again. But sadly, he is obsessed to such a
degree, it is impossible for him. If this irritates you all you have
to do is tell him to stop the stalking and the squealing and it's
over.
A few direct quotes from the pro-Choice, Houston Libertarian, Squealer
and Loser Patrick Humphrey confirming his threats and stalking:
--Patrick L. 'a grandfather to be -- and any congratulations from a
sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos will be returned with a grenade
with a pulled pin' Humphrey
--PLH, and people wonder why I occasionally pedal by Dahlman's house
to give him the one-finger salute...
Oh...and you need to trim the mustache...
--Patrick L. è–¦l Lago, April 9, about 14:35 remember me?' Humphrey"
You need to clean up the toys in your driveway...
--Patrick L. "Dave can't stand that I know where he lives" Humphrey
I guess it's just an amazing coincidence, then, that the pictures on
your home page just happen to bear an uncanny resemblance to the
fellow out in front of your listed address when I came down the street
one afternoon three weeks ago...
--Patrick L. 'coming by again in two weeks' Humphrey
"I don't think so, because you don't resemble me at all...and that
much I know from personal experience, after two weekends ago.
--Patrick L. 訴t was a worthwhile 88 miles spent' Humphrey
Be sure to understand this is about the sixth occasion this squealer
has been to what he presumes to be my home... Rack Jite
---Try *fourth* --Patrick L. 'bout time to put on the Spandex and
pedal over that way :-)'Humphrey"
The tire swing in front of your house...
--Patrick L. "still pedaling" Humphrey
Thanks to a gutless bastard in the Houston suburbs named David F.
Dahlman, you mean. And I never claimed there was a tire swing in your
front yard, liar. Your _neighbor's_ yard, yes -- and that was
something like three years ago, too. Are you going to state that your
yard is in the same state of being cluttered now as it was three years
ago?--Patrick L. "14 days, tick tick tick, heh heh" Humphrey
I've pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time, just by
dumb luck, he and his family happened to be outside.
--Patrick L. Humphrey
Actually, I live on the other side of the Houston area from Dave...and
the shortest possible pedal between where I live and where he lives
would be something like 40 miles. That's one reason I've done it only
a couple of times. (Yes, Dave, the other times I've been by, I drove.
:) Hey, it's good exercise, and it gives Dave the chance to jerk his
knee.
--Patrick L. better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
to Austin :-) Humphrey
Hey, S. Shawn...now that you're in the DFW area, you'll have to hide
under your bed again, because we're going to be up there next weekend
--PLH, six days and rolling
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--Patrick L. Humphrey
---No, it's more like you're in your own little world out there in the
Houston suburbs. --Patrick L. "17 days and pedaling" Humphrey
--Patrick L. "I think I just guaranteed myself a smooth pedal down to
the Island" Humphrey
It figures a foreigner like you couldn't.... Personally, I'd just as
soon you go back to whatever underprivileged neighborhood in the U.S.
you got booted out of -- the farther away from Texas, the better.
That is _my_ opinion.
--Patrick L. and it can be yours, but it'll cost ya big time Humphrey
You lie like a rug, "Shawn". Pointing out that Dahlman lives across
town from me -- so what? ...I have NEVER posted the name on his
mailbox (another interesting claim, since you think his mailbox is on
the street, and it isn't -- no one's is, in that area, and in a LOT of
areas all over Houston), and I pointed out the appearance of his yard
*two years ago*, Get back to me when you can write something
original, "Shawn". Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only
37 days away from being in the same city as you.
--Patrick L. "just thought I'd say that" Humphrey
Besides, I'm going to be pedaling by, less than five miles away, on
the morning of March 30
--Patrick L. "pull!" Humphrey
--PLH, I'll deal with Shawn on the 30th, heh heh heh
Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood.
--PLH, I've got a Bat Attitude.
It's funny, though, that at one time, Jimbo had FOUR phone lines
listed under his name at one address -- and then, all of a
sudden, he's down to ONE line at a different address that is actually
an apartment complex. Yeah, I know a LOT of people who move an entire
family from a house to a cracker-box apartment...--PLH
---
Picture and more info on this abject loser at:
http://www.dragonfire.net/~RJ/squealer.htm
---
I suppose I can understand the selfish callous disregard
of conservatives, it's their pride in it that passes me by.
--------------------------------------------
Conservatively Incorrect http://www.dragonfire.net/~RJ/
Barbara Schwarz
> Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) writes:
>
> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkis9z...@fnord.io.com>...
> >> Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) writes:
>
> >> >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>
> >> Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
>
> >What are you trying to suggest, Patrick Lee Humphrey, that Garry
> >Scarff shall kill and exteriorize me?
>
> No, since you *are* an OT, aren't you, you brain-damaged Hubbardfellater?
>
> >Faxhor discovered that stalked somebody and lost your job at Rice
> >university.
>
> FaxWhore is a Scientologist, and he's lying.
I never caught Faxhor in any lie. He supported his claim that you are
a stalker with numerous references.
> I didn't stalk anyone.
Not according to the records.
> I sure
> pissed off a few net kooks, though. That wasn't what led to my dismissal,
> though. Use your alleged powers and find out for yourself. *snicker*
That is what you say to justify your stalkings?
>
> >Who did you stalk and why? Must have been quite serious when you lost your
> >job.
>
> I didn't stalk anyone. For an OT, you're one *stupid* bag lady.
Yeah, right.
>
> >Could not just been a few unwanted phone calls to a girlfriend that dumped
> >you for understandable reasons.
>
> *laugh*
>
> My wife and I had only been together for almost fourteen years by that time --
> and we're still together.
Poor woman. Did you mindcontrol her to stay with you?
Barbara Schwarz
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkmzz9...@fnord.io.com>...
>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>> >================================================================
>> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
>> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
>> > to lower your standards even more."
>> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
>> >================================================================
>Well, Faxhor got to your crimes, Patrick Lee Humphrey, and you don't
>take it like a reformed man, but like a stalker.
Why should I take it like anything, when I never did it in the first place?
The law-enforcement agencies where I live agree with me, not you or your
insane fellow Scientologists.
>"Though Rice University has sent me a letter of apology for the
>actions
>of Mr. Humphrey and Rice Legal Department no longer allows him to use
>his employee account as a base for his stalking, he now uses a paid
>service to carry on his pyschotic obsession with me. As most anything
>goes with ISPs, it leaves me few options to deal with this little
>netscab. As literally thousands of liberals have been intimitated out
>of the political newsgroups because of this onerous game, I am going
>to fight it." (Read more in below posting of Rack.)
Funny how Dave Dahlman ("Rack Jite"'s real name) posted that in 1997...and I
didn't leave Rice until the end of 2001. Even funnier, in typical
Scientologist fashion, you'll take *anything* derogatory about em as gospel
truth without question. The facts tell a far different story than the
psychotic episode you're pushing. What's REALLY funny is that Dahlman is
still frothing at the mouth at me if I post in any newsgroup he annoys -- all
because I know his real name from being on the same BBS as him *twenty years
ago*. You've always had a soft spot for fellow lunatics, haven't you, Boobs?
You're still not shuddering me into silence, even with your TR 0 fuck-ups.
Hope you like RPF and running around the pole a lot...
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkpt45...@fnord.io.com>...
>> Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) writes:
>> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkis9z...@fnord.io.com>...
>> >> Barbara...@myway.com (Still_lying_about_Marty) writes:
>> >> >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>> >> Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
>> >What are you trying to suggest, Patrick Lee Humphrey, that Garry
>> >Scarff shall kill and exteriorize me?
>> No, since you *are* an OT, aren't you, you brain-damaged Hubbardfellater?
>> >Faxhor discovered that stalked somebody and lost your job at Rice
>> >university.
>> FaxWhore is a Scientologist, and he's lying.
>I never caught Faxhor in any lie. He supported his claim that you are
>a stalker with numerous references.
...none of which belong to actual police agencies or officers. Those quotes
are all from net kooks who couldn't prove anything about me.
>> I didn't stalk anyone.
>Not according to the records.
Theer are no *official* records -- because I never did any such thing.
Word-clear THAT, PsuchoBitch.
>> I sure pissed off a few net kooks, though. That wasn't what led to my
>> dismissal, though. Use your alleged powers and find out for yourself.
>> *snicker*
>That is what you say to justify your stalkings?
I don't have to justify something I never did, little illegal alien.
>> >Who did you stalk and why? Must have been quite serious when you lost your
>> >job.
>> I didn't stalk anyone. For an OT, you're one *stupid* bag lady.
>Yeah, right.
I'll bet your psychotic life on it.
>> >Could not just been a few unwanted phone calls to a girlfriend that dumped
>> >you for understandable reasons.
>> *laugh*
>> My wife and I had only been together for almost fourteen years by that time
>> -- and we're still together.
>Poor woman. Did you mindcontrol her to stay with you?
I'm not a brain-ravaged Scientologist like you are, therefore I don't lie
about being able to "mindcontrol" like you're so fond of.
Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to be
a good time for you.
ladayla
>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to be
>a good time for you.
If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or mission
in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
la
>
Patrick Lee Humphrey
Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that she's
too crazy even for the Co$...
Lady Chatterly
Still_lying_about_Marty
>
> > >> >is banned from the Salt Lake City Library computers??
>
> > >> Maybe she'll exteriorize? ;-)
>
> > >What are you trying to suggest, Patrick Lee Humphrey, that Garry
> > >Scarff shall kill and exteriorize me?
Forwarded to the LAPD as an example of the Schwarz' frivolous &
malicious behavior.
snip
> >
> > I didn't stalk anyone. For an OT, you're one *stupid* bag lady.
>
> Yeah, right.
> >
> > >Could not just been a few unwanted phone calls to a girlfriend that dumped
> > >you for understandable reasons.
> >
> > *laugh*
> >
> > My wife and I had only been together for almost fourteen years by that time --
> > and we're still together.
>
> Poor woman. Did you mindcontrol her to stay with you?
At least he has a *REAL* mate, you dumb bitch. Unlike your imaginary
husband and imaginary family.
You must be real happy that *no one* loves you anymore, not even your
niece.
Barbara
Still_lying_about_Marty
Really? Is that why you claimed to have visited her in Salt Lake City?
Faxhor
"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
to lower your standards even more."
- Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
================================================================
Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
Faxhor
ladayla
>
>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
>
>>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>
>>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to
>>>be a good time for you.
>
>>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or
>>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
>
>Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that she's
>too crazy even for the Co$...
If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
la
>
Cerridwen
I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
But somehow that seems different to me.
I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
Cerridwen
>
>la
>>
Patrick Lee Humphrey
Really? How many newsgroups have I posted to in the fifteen years I've had
Usenet access? (How many überkooks hiding behind aliases, like you are, are
posting those remarks?)
K Palmer
Cerridwen:
You are so right but sometimes Ms Schwartz' paranoid delusions just HAVE
to be addressed. That and her continual posting of the pages from the
cults so-called "freedom watch" site makes my fingers twitch.
Yes she is seriously mentally ill and needs serious medical help but
will never get it unless forced to by some outside agency. Her
pathological fear of all things psychological is definitely a serious
problem for her ever getting the kind of help and support she so
obviously needs. That and her continual never ending FOIA abuse calls
for someone to tell her it is time to stop. Even if she won't.
We all have our weaknesses but that is what being human is all about
accepting the fact that we have faults and learning to overcome them
when possible.
Keep up the great work you are doing so that we can hope that no more
Barbara Schwartz's are created by the abusive cult of scientology.
Kim P
>
>>la
>>
>
>
>
Barbara Schwarz
He can't be aware of it, Ladaya, as it is not true. He is making it up
and is lying. He has an extremly low character.
Barbara Schwarz
Zinj
> On 30 Sep 2004 19:27:22 -0000, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header
> (Cerridwen) wrote:
>
> >>If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
>
> >I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
> >obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
> >retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
> >
> >But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
> >
> >But somehow that seems different to me.
> >
> >I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
>
> harasses, and she threatens. Most mentally ill people and most
> handicapped people do not do these things. "Taunting" her is generally
> a means of self-defense. She certainly deserves sympathy and pitty for
> what Scientology and Scientology Inc. did to her (drove her
> psychotic), but that doesn't mean she ought to be free to harass and
> abuse people.
I gotta problem with this. In the first place, 'taunting' isn't all that
horrible a crime in a usenet setting. After all, nobody *makes* people
come onto usenet in general, or ARS in particular and expose themselves
in public. Taunting is perfectly normal usenet behavior when it's
specifically addressed to the foibles one has *chosen* to exercise in
the same venue.
Teasing Barbara about being out of her ever lovin gourd is in fact and
in at least some circumstances a *friendly* gesture. Nobody forces her
to put on that lampshade-hat, and in a way, 'taunting' her about it is a
congenial or even helpful acceptance of her 'position' in this 'non-
group'.
Hell; I've even taunted *you* about some positions you've chosen to
adopt which I consider loony or at least nonsensical or
counterproductive.
Now, if I have someone I run into in real life who's under the delusion
that she's Mary Queen of Scots, I may or may not 'taunt' her about it.
Usually it'll be dependent on just how *close* a 'friend' she(he?) is;
with more taunting for actual friends than merely loony accidental
acquanitances. Those I don't particularly care about, and therefore
don't bother with the effort to 'taunt'.
Matter of fact; I quite *often* taunt some otherwise valuable critics
who tend to the screeching bile-spewing school of hysteria. There's
something *therapeutic* about helping fulminating cauldrons of
pressurized spew attain release. Sometimes it helps them achieve the
necessary measure of venting to allow them to return to relative sanity.
No, my problem with this whole 'retaliation' crap is this:
Discussion groups are for discussion. There is an 'assumption' in any
discussion that it's about discussion, not about 'ruining people
utterly'; 'shuddering people into silence' or 'chasing them off'.
One of my pet peeves with 'critics' over the past (almost) decade, but
especially over the past 5 years or so is an increasing adoption of
*Scientology* methods and tactics.
To counter an opponent's 'discussion' by 'investigating him', rather
than answering his discussion is a *Scientology* tactic. And yes; I mean
Scientology whether 'the philosophy' or the more directly malevolent
'organization'.
The tactic is one that Hubbard *prescribed*, and that is 'dogma' for
Scientology; whether 'Church' of Scientology or merely 'the philosophy'.
It gets worse. 'We' think that someone says things we don't want seen
about Scientology?
If we were Scientologists, 'we' would try to 'shudder him into silence'.
We would count our stats. We would try to 'out produce' him. We would
attempt to 'cave him' by screaming invective; or 'shudder him into
silence' by 'discovering' his 'crimes'.
My my my. *Some* people here have adopted those methods! Are they
Scientologists?
No Virginia; merely despicably not-up-to-the-challenge self-proclaimed
'Critics'.
The last time I looked, the 'ARSCC' didn't count stats for 'driving
enemies off' or 'outproducing entheta'.
Of course, *some* of these oh-so-scientological critics don't *only* use
Scientology methods against Scientologists. Oh no! They adopt the
tactics against other *critics* (not that that's any more deplorable);
even stooping to using Scientology created black PR against their
'personal enemies'; or the enemies of their particular clique.
In a way that's comforting. If you're going to act like a Scientologist,
it probably *is* less hypocritical to adopt the tactics universally.
After all.. L. Ron Hubbard told us that the way to deal with 'enemies'
is to 'shudder them into silence' and 'ruin them utterly'.
Well done!
I think if I were to be asked what my point is, I would say this:
I consider any attempt to 'shudder people into silence' or 'make them
shut up' or 'drive them off ARS' to be purely despicable. No better than
Scientology itself, and worthy of general contempt.
That's what I mean.
Barbara can post here as long as she wants. There is no reason to 'out-
produce' her. There is no reason to 'silence her'. She is a *wonderful*
example of Scientology at Work.
Obviously she's not even accepted by the 'Church' *except* on one level:
Barbara Schwarz is *not* an OSA OP, but they're perfectly willing to
take advantage of her by feeding her Scientology Created insanity with
information likely to trigger her to do things that not even the cult of
shameless trusts itself to do publicly.
For that she's ideal. OSA can send her mail, can send her email, can
push her completely predictable buttons anytime it wants.
Her 'Wahn' is a Scientology 'Wahn', and they can *use* her as much as
they want.
But... WHAT THE HELL is supposed to be the value in 'retaliation'
against her?
Are you people really so stupid as to think that 'shuddering into
silence' or 'driving off' or 'ruining utterly' is an 'effective'
activist tactic?
Sometimes, some of the people; some of the people I highly respect and
value; also deserve vomit.
Scientology Critics are *not* Scientologists. We do not need or *want*
their methods.
Zinj
--
You can lead a Clam to Reason, but you Can't Make him Think
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> wrote in message news:<cjhc6...@drn.newsguy.com>...
>> In article <szklles...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...
>> >ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
>> >>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>> >>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going
>> >>>to be a good time for you.
>> >>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or
>> >>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
>> >Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that
>> >she's too crazy even for the Co$...
>> If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
>He can't be aware of it, Ladaya, as it is not true. He is making it up
>and is lying. He has an extremly low character.
So tell me, Superior Being (snork!), what's printed on the shirt I'm wearing
as I type this? (At least you could be thankful that the Scam of Scientology
hasn't turned you into another Lisa McPherson yet.)
Faxhor
> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>
> >================================================================
> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
> > to lower your standards even more."
> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
> >================================================================
>
> >Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
>
> Really?
Yes
And by the way, Patrick Lee Humphrey, do not contact me or address
me in any way.
Here's a few more quotes:
"Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought
to encounter 'Shawn' when I'm in Austin next month"
- Patrick L. Humphrey
"I've pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time,
just by dumb luck, he and his family happened to be outside."
- Patrick L. Humphrey
"Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only 37 days away
from being in the same city as you."
- Patrick L. Humphrey
"any congratulations from a sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos
will be returned with a grenade with a pulled pin"
- Patrick L. Humphrey
"Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood."
..."I've got a Bat Attitude."
- Patrick L. Humphrey
"Actually, I live on the other side of the Houston area from Dave
...and the shortest possible pedal between where I live and where
he lives would be something like 40 miles. That's one reason I've
done it only a couple of times. (Yes, Dave, the other times I've
been by, I drove. :) Hey, it's good exercise, and it gives Dave
the chance to jerk his knee."
- Patrick L. Humphrey
". . . better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
to Austin"
- Patrick L. Humphrey
Faxhor
Lady Chatterly
Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header (Cerridwen) wrote:
>
>On 30 Sep 2004, ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>In article <szklles...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...
>>>
>>>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>>>
>>>>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to
>>>>>be a good time for you.
>>>
>>>>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or
>>>>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
>>>
>>>Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that she's
>>>too crazy even for the Co$...
>>
>>If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
>
>I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
>obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
>retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
Btw, did you finish collecting your shots bwhahahaha!
>But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
Are Xs4all rates very expensive?
>But somehow that seems different to me.
Do you live in Amsterdam?
>I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
Does it make you excited to be the pot calling the kettle black?
>Cerridwen
How much are Xs4all's rates?
--
Lady Chatterly
"A bot it may be, but somebody set it up in the first place. They
don't just wander around like viruses." -- Aetyr
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>> >================================================================
>> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
>> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
>> > to lower your standards even more."
>> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
>> >================================================================
>> >Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
>> Really?
>Yes
Bullshit, as usual, anonymous clam coward. You're too spineless to even deal
your own hyperbole, much less the fact that you're beating the same dead horse
your new Nazi friends have been pounding for years.
>And by the way, Patrick Lee Humphrey, do not contact me or address
>me in any way.
I'm contacting you in a public newsgroup, ClamDolt. Anyone can respond to
your crap. Whine and call the cops if you're so upset. (Incidentally, I'd
like some pictures of me at the 1995 picket we did of the Houston mission.
Your fellow clams got a few...oops! They're not there any more. The
mission's turned over more than a few times in the nine years since that day.
Oh, well.)
>Here's a few more quotes:
"chiefinstigator.us.tt/ars.html"
There's the one you need.
ladayla
>
>On 30 Sep 2004, ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>In article <szklles...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...
>>>
>>>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
>>>
>>>>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>>>
>>>>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to
>>>>>be a good time for you.
>>>
>>>>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or
>>>>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
>>>
>>>Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that she's
>>>too crazy even for the Co$...
>>
>>If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
>
>I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
>obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
>retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
>
>But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
And I sometimes reply to Claire's.
>
>But somehow that seems different to me.
>
>I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
Me too. Sigh.
la
>
>
>
>Cerridwen
>
>
>>
>>la
>>>
>
>
>
Cerridwen
LOL! You are so bad!
Cerridwen
barb
I think the reason people taunt her is because she is such a nasty piece
of work. She has said really disgusting things about some posters here,
and insanity is no excuse for rude behavior.
>
>>
>>
>>Cerridwen
>>
>>
>>
>>>la
>>>
>>
>>
>
--
--barb
Chaplain,ARSCC
"Imagine a church so dangerous, you must sign a release
form before you can receive its "spiritual assistance."
This assistance might involve holding you against your
will for an indefinite period, isolating you from
friends and family, and denying you access to
appropriate medical care. You will of course be billed
for this treatment - assuming you survive it. If not,
the release form absolves your caretakers of all
responsibility for your suffering and death.
Welcome to the Church of Scientology."
--Dr. Dave Touretzky
Peter Alexander
Faxhor
> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>
> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
> >> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>
> >> >================================================================
> >> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
> >> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
> >> > to lower your standards even more."
> >> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
> >> >================================================================
>
Patrick: Really?
Faxhor: Yes
Patrick snips my evidence then says: Bullshit . . .
So I, Faxhor, say here are the quotes again:
c...@c.cc
Rev. Desertphile de Rothschild
>In article <415c...@news2.lightlink.com>, deser...@cchr.ws says...
>> Psycho Barb is abusive; she slanders, she lies, she hates, she
>> harasses, and she threatens. Most mentally ill people and most
>> handicapped people do not do these things. "Taunting" her is generally
>> a means of self-defense. She certainly deserves sympathy and pitty for
>> what Scientology and Scientology Inc. did to her (drove her
>> psychotic), but that doesn't mean she ought to be free to harass and
>> abuse people.
>I gotta problem with this. In the first place, 'taunting' isn't all that
>horrible a crime in a usenet setting. After all, nobody *makes* people
>come onto usenet in general, or ARS in particular and expose themselves
>in public. Taunting is perfectly normal usenet behavior when it's
>specifically addressed to the foibles one has *chosen* to exercise in
>the same venue.
I concede nearly all of your points (above and below) are valid and
true. Certainly I am a fanatic, and I offer no apology for being so:
my convictions I cheerfully and agressively defend. Many times I asked
Ms. Schwarz to cease slandering and libeling me: those requests were
replied to with abuse and more slander. Several times I ask the Salt
Lake City Library to warn Ms. Schwarz to cease her slander and libel:
the library did so, but Ms. Schwarz's behavior did not improve. Surely
you can understand why my frustration (and that of others in a.r.s.)
has resulted in "taunting" her, yes? She is working hard to inflict
SERIOUS DAMAGE to several human rights activists who contrinute to
a.r.s. Such behavior draws "taunting" to it. At least one a.r.s.
contributor has been subjected to her trying to get him fired from the
uniersity at which he teaches; yet another a.r.s. contributer she
recently tried to get arrested--- both for no rational reason, but
based upon her mental illness.
What I do not concede is the suggestion that "taunting" Ms. Schwarz is
"Scientology behavior."
>Teasing Barbara about being out of her ever lovin gourd is in fact and
>in at least some circumstances a *friendly* gesture. Nobody forces her
>to put on that lampshade-hat, and in a way, 'taunting' her about it is a
>congenial or even helpful acceptance of her 'position' in this 'non-
>group'.
>
>Hell; I've even taunted *you* about some positions you've chosen to
>adopt which I consider loony or at least nonsensical or
>counterproductive.
Now and then I have thanked for for the "taunting." As I said, I'm the
first to say that my convictions are passonately felt and passionately
expressed; I have neer held any annimosity towards people who consider
me a "loonie:" I do hold enmity towards those who slander and libel
me.
>Now, if I have someone I run into in real life who's under the delusion
>that she's Mary Queen of Scots, I may or may not 'taunt' her about it.
>Usually it'll be dependent on just how *close* a 'friend' she(he?) is;
>with more taunting for actual friends than merely loony accidental
>acquanitances. Those I don't particularly care about, and therefore
>don't bother with the effort to 'taunt'.
Suppose the "Mary, Queen of Scots" woman you met spent her every
waking minutes actively seeking you harm? Going through court records
looking for "dirt"on you; filing baseless police complaints about you;
trying to get you fired from your job; slandering you; libeling you.
If you tell her to cease, she will scream "First Amendment!" at you.
Will you still remain so polite to her?
---
RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GORE IN 2004
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk3c0y...@fnord.io.com>...
>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
>> >> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>> >> >================================================================
>> >> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
>> >> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
>> >> > to lower your standards even more."
>> >> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
>> >> >================================================================
>Faxhor: Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
>Patrick: Really?
>Faxhor: Yes
>Patrick snips my evidence then says: Bullshit . . .
...and you, cowardly clam, can't even quote my whole statement. TR 0 is your
way of life, isn't it?
>So I, Faxhor, say here are the quotes again:
...and there they go, again. (I guess you're too clueless to notice that
anyone can still see your excretions by going back up the thread, but I
realize you're not allowed by your masters to read too much of Usenet.)
Rev. Desertphile de Rothschild
> I think the reason people taunt her is because she is such a
> nasty piece of work. She has said really disgusting things
> about some posters here, and insanity is no excuse for rude
> behavior.
Not just rude behavior: abusive behavior. Trying to get Gary Scarff
arrested for NO RATIONAL REASON was abusive: trying to get Dave
Touretzky fired from his place of employment was (and is) abusive. I
for one don't give a rat's fart about rude behavior: it's Psycho
Barb's abusive behavior that is objectionable.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>He's a stalker. They are impotent losers - scared of their own shadow.
Gee, a Nazi troll from alt.revisionism wanders in to get his kicks...
Barbara Schwarz
> On 30 Sep 2004 19:27:22 -0000, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header
> (Cerridwen) wrote:
>
>
> >I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
> >obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
> >retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
> >
> >But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
> >
> >But somehow that seems different to me.
> >
> >I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
>
Don't try to give me your and your friend's character, Dave Rice, you
are the abusive psycho and identity stealer.
> she slanders,
I don't, but you do. Where is the evidence?
>she lies, she hates, she
> harasses,
I don't, but you do. Provide the evidence where I did that.
>and she threatens.
You are one disgusting criminal. Provide the evidence. Lying that I
did is libel on your part, Mister.
>Most mentally ill people and most
> handicapped people do not do these things.
You do those things and you are not sane.
> "Taunting" her is generally
> a means of self-defense.
I never protested that people should not speak their opinions in here
or elsewhere. I never complained about "taunting". I just don't need
you hate-trolls seriously. You are making fools out of yourself. Do
you really think that if you, Humphrey or Scarff post nasty remarks
that I run home crying? My goodness, after two years on ARS, you guys
just don't know me.
> She certainly deserves sympathy and pitty for
Pitty? You mean pity. Yes, I pity you, and you have a strange way of
showing sympathy, by libeling me, you lawless bastard.
> what Scientology and Scientology Inc. did to her (drove her
> psychotic),
SCN never drove me to anything.
>but that doesn't mean she ought to be free to harass and
> abuse people.
You are the abuser. I don't abuse anybody, but I suppose that posting
below copy of a PDF file of the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org with
truth about you is also "abusive". "Abusive" and all the other lies
that you posted above apparently are when somebody catches you or your
friends in unlawful activities and has the guts to write about it.
Get lost, Dave Rice. You are one sticky disgusting creature. Yuck!
Barbara Schwarz
Copied from a PDF file of the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org, the
extemist page 10 of David Touretzy, the bomb and porn instruction guy:
Robert Clark was arrested in 1990 for hacking into Los Alamos National
Laboratory and has posted bomb threats on the internet.
Zenon Panoussis is hosting websites containing bomb-making
instructions and was a member of the Anti-Olympic Committee which
supported bombings to sabotage the 2004 Olympics. He was arrested in
1999 for verbally assaulting a police officer.
David Rice suggested in a posting to kill members of the FBI.
Frederic Rice has threatened governmental officials over the Internet.
He also hosts a site where he gives tips on how to kill bikers.
Andreas Heldal-Lund hosts a website with a message board that contains
death threats.
Arnie Lerma is a supporter of the Neo Nazis movement founded by Willis
Carto and is on the Board of Policy of Liberty Lobby, an anti-semitic
organization founded by Carto. He is also associated with the Utopian
Anarchist Party, that promotes the overthrowing of the U.S.
government, the killing of police officers and their website teaches
how to build bombs. Lerma is close to William White, spokesperson of
UAP who was arrested and convicted of battery and carrying a concealed
weapons.
Barbara Schwarz
And you are so boring and stupid, Cerridwen. Did you also stalk people
as Patrick Lee Humphrey did?
Barbara Schwarz
Patrick Lee Humphrey
[...to Cerrdiwen...]
>And you are so boring and stupid, Cerridwen. Did you also stalk people
>as Patrick Lee Humphrey did?
You migth want to prove I stalked anyone before you start proclaiming it as
fact. Pick up a phone and dial 713 308-8000. That's the main inbound line to
HPD. Tell them your fantasy, and watch how fast they decide you're annoying
them.
Ball of Fluff
> In article <3SCX7C9P382...@anonymous.poster>, Cerridwen says...
> >
> >On 30 Sep 2004, ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >>In article <szklles...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...
> >>>
> >>>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey
says...>
> >>>
> >>>>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not
going to
> >>>>>be a good time for you.
> >>>
> >>>>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org
or
> >>>>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no
way.
> >>>
> >>>Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her
that she's
> >>>too crazy even for the Co$...
> >>
> >>If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
> >
> >I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
> >obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
> >retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
> >
> >But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
>
> And I sometimes reply to Claire's.
Gee, thanks for placing me in that august company. Thanks a ~lot~.
If I start yapping about Marcabians and string pulling and who's out to get
whom, just shoot me, ok?
C
Faxhor
remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
that he reads this article:
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
Faxhor
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
*yawn* Since I've never done anything like that, in Australia or anywhere
else, your attempts to shudder me into silence are continuin in their
futility. Prove me wrong, FaxWhore.
Still_lying_about_Marty
> On 30 Sep 2004 19:27:22 -0000, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header
> (Cerridwen) wrote:
>
>
> >I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
> >obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
> >retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
> >
> >But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
> >
> >But somehow that seems different to me.
> >
> >I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
>
> harasses, and she threatens. Most mentally ill people and most
> handicapped people do not do these things. "Taunting" her is generally
> a means of self-defense. She certainly deserves sympathy and pitty for
> what Scientology and Scientology Inc. did to her (drove her
> abuse people.
I suspect that if Scientology is guilty of anything, it took advantage
of PsychoBarb's mental health issues, manipulated them and enhanced
them, but I doubt Scientology caused them.
Still_lying_about_Marty
I agree with you 100%, Barb. Why can't people be as positive,
compassionate and polite as I have always been? :-)
realpch
Well what do you think? Should those of us who have been subjected to
home pickets by the Church of Scientology have the home picketers
charged with stalking?
Peach
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Faxhor wrote:
>> Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
>> remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
>> that he reads this article:
>> http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
>Well what do you think? Should those of us who have been subjected to
>home pickets by the Church of Scientology have the home picketers
>charged with stalking?
It's possible, but the CoS can't exactly make normal people fear for their
lives, these days...
Barbara Schwarz
> Cerridwen wrote:
> > On 30 Sep 2004, ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >
> >>In article <szklles...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...
> >>
> >>>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>
> >>>>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to
> >>>>>be a good time for you.
>
> >>>>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or
> >>>>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
> >>>
> >>>Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that she's
> >>>too crazy even for the Co$...
> >>
> >>If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
> >
> >
> > I've never understood why some of the people here taunt her. She's
> > obviously mentally ill. Would these same people tease the mentally
> > retarded and taunt physically handicapped? I don't get it.
> >
> > But then again, I do reply to Virginia's posts ;->
> >
> >
> > I guess I am the pot calling the kettle black. ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Cerridwen:
I thought you never would post in response to my postings, Kimmy
Palmer? Now you are
back again. What do you want anyway? Are you Kady O'Malley by the way,
the other Canadian who is afraid of the Canadian Mountain Police? Do
you harbour fugitive of justice, Keith Henson? I think you are Kady
O'Malley and you are libeling me by lying that I am mentally ill. Do
you think that misspelling intentionally my name protects you from a
libel suit? In fact, your postings tell me costantly that you don't
have all marbles together.
And you have not the foggiest about L. Ron Hubbard either.
Get an IQ, Kim or should I say Kady? And a character would not hurt
either.
Barbara Schwarz
copied from the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
KADY O'MALLEY
Kady O'Malley is a Canadian anti-religious extremist who has been part
of a dedicated hate campaign against the Church of Scientology for
many years. She is a regular member of an internet newsgroup where
extremists Arnaldo Lerma, Keith Henson and others assail the
Scientology religion and its members, and also frequents an
underground IRC channel controlled by Arnaldo Lerma.
O'Malley's attacks, however, are not confined to words. In March
1999, Kady O'Malley entered the United States with the purpose of
harassing professionals working for the Church of Scientology.
Together with her friend, Brian Murphy, O'Malley photographed these
professional's homes and vehicle license plates and posted them on the
Internet, her intention being to discourage these people from working
for the Church by disrupting their lives and upsetting their family
members, friends and business associates.
This purposeful harassment and abuse of privacy was documented in a
letter of complaint to O'Malley's employer, the U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service, and the Internet Service Provider (ISP)
concerned, as follows:
"I am writing with regards to [.........] Kady O'Malley. Ms. O'Malley
has a website on [.........]. Last week, Ms. O'Malley posted to her
website photographs of my home, that of my partner, and those of
several other individuals."
"Apparently, Ms. O'Malley came to Los Angeles in the week or so before
that and took these photographs while she was here. As you will see on
the first page of her [name deleted] photographs, Ms. O'Malley
suggests that she intends to produce maps to direct others to these
homes."
[ Page 1 ] [ Page 2 ]
Barbara Schwarz
Palmer? Now you are
back again. What do you want anyway? Are you Kady O'Malley by the way,
the other Canadian who is afraid of the Canadian Mountain Police? Do
you harbour fugitive of justice, Keith Henson? I think you are Kady
O'Malley and you are libeling me by lying that I am mentally ill. Do
you think that misspelling intentionally my name protects you from a
libel suit? In fact, your postings tell me costantly that you don't
have all marbles together.
And you have not the foggiest about L. Ron Hubbard either.
Get an IQ, Kim or should I say Kady? And a character would not hurt
either. I also wonder what "good work" Cherridwen ever did except
misinformation and boring people (just as yourself) to death.
Barbara Schwarz
> In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>
> >Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to be
> >a good time for you.
>
> If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or mission
> in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
>
> >
Why is there no way, Jana? It is not that I don't know where to find
the orgs. :) We just talked three minutes, what makes you think that
you know about me?
Barbara Schwarz
Lady Chatterly
Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote:
>
>I thought you never would post in response to my postings, Kimmy
>Palmer? Now you are
>back again. What do you want anyway? Are you Kady O'Malley by the way,
>the other Canadian who is afraid of the Canadian Mountain Police? Do
>you harbour fugitive of justice, Keith Henson? I think you are Kady
>O'Malley and you are libeling me by lying that I am mentally ill. Do
>you think that misspelling intentionally my name protects you from a
>libel suit? In fact, your postings tell me costantly that you don't
>have all marbles together.
>
>And you have not the foggiest about L. Ron Hubbard either.
Ron hubbard, jr.
>Get an IQ, Kim or should I say Kady? And a character would not hurt
>either. I also wonder what "good work" Cherridwen ever did except
>misinformation and boring people (just as yourself) to death.
It is not up to me if you should say kady.
>Barbara Schwarz
Where is salt lake city?
>copied from the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
> KADY O'MALLEY
>
>Kady O'Malley is a Canadian anti-religious extremist who has been part
>of a dedicated hate campaign against the Church of Scientology for
>many years. She is a regular member of an internet newsgroup where
>extremists Arnaldo Lerma, Keith Henson and others assail the
>Scientology religion and its members, and also frequents an
>underground IRC channel controlled by Arnaldo Lerma.
Religiousfreedomwatch?
>O'Malley's attacks, however, are not confined to words. In March
>1999, Kady O'Malley entered the United States with the purpose of
>harassing professionals working for the Church of Scientology.
>Together with her friend, Brian Murphy, O'Malley photographed these
>professional's homes and vehicle license plates and posted them on the
>Internet, her intention being to discourage these people from working
>for the Church by disrupting their lives and upsetting their family
>members, friends and business associates.
In march.
>This purposeful harassment and abuse of privacy was documented in a
>letter of complaint to O'Malley's employer, the U.S. Immigration and
>Naturalization Service, and the Internet Service Provider (ISP)
>concerned, as follows:
N.
>"I am writing with regards to [.........] Kady O'Malley. Ms. O'Malley
>has a website on [.........]. Last week, Ms. O'Malley posted to her
>website photographs of my home, that of my partner, and those of
>several other individuals."
Last week, ms.
>"Apparently, Ms. O'Malley came to Los Angeles in the week or so before
>that and took these photographs while she was here. As you will see on
>the first page of her [name deleted] photographs, Ms. O'Malley
>suggests that she intends to produce maps to direct others to these
>homes."
>
>
>[ Page 1 ] [ Page 2 ]
O'malley.
--
Lady Chatterly
"You and Riki should shack up, Lady C, he's been feeling pretty lonely
ever since Trinity dumped him." -- Onideus Mad Hatter
Lady Chatterly
Why do you want to know if I think that misspelling intentionally my
name protects me from a libel suit?
>And you have not the foggiest about L. Ron Hubbard either.
This month, you are likely to be busy furthering a passionate carnal
relationship with a latex sex toy. Either that, or your neighbors dog
will develop a rabid fear of you and an aversion to the scent of
Vaseline.
>Get an IQ, Kim or should I say Kady? And a character would not hurt
>either.
It is not up to me to determine whether or not you should say kady.
>Barbara Schwarz
Where is salt lake city?
>copied from the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
> KADY O'MALLEY
>
>Kady O'Malley is a Canadian anti-religious extremist who has been part
>of a dedicated hate campaign against the Church of Scientology for
>many years. She is a regular member of an internet newsgroup where
>extremists Arnaldo Lerma, Keith Henson and others assail the
>Scientology religion and its members, and also frequents an
>underground IRC channel controlled by Arnaldo Lerma.
Religiousfreedomwatch?
>O'Malley's attacks, however, are not confined to words. In March
>1999, Kady O'Malley entered the United States with the purpose of
>harassing professionals working for the Church of Scientology.
>Together with her friend, Brian Murphy, O'Malley photographed these
>professional's homes and vehicle license plates and posted them on the
>Internet, her intention being to discourage these people from working
>for the Church by disrupting their lives and upsetting their family
>members, friends and business associates.
This way they save money?
>This purposeful harassment and abuse of privacy was documented in a
>letter of complaint to O'Malley's employer, the U.S. Immigration and
>Naturalization Service, and the Internet Service Provider (ISP)
>concerned, as follows:
Based church of scientology launched a global and unsucccssful
campaign to prevent publication of a reader's.
>"I am writing with regards to [.........] Kady O'Malley. Ms. O'Malley
>has a website on [.........]. Last week, Ms. O'Malley posted to her
>website photographs of my home, that of my partner, and those of
>several other individuals."
Are you excited you are writing with regards to?
>"Apparently, Ms. O'Malley came to Los Angeles in the week or so before
>that and took these photographs while she was here. As you will see on
>the first page of her [name deleted] photographs, Ms. O'Malley
>suggests that she intends to produce maps to direct others to these
>homes."
>
>
>[ Page 1 ] [ Page 2 ]
Go figure. 100,000 sperm and YOU were the fastest.
--
Lady Chatterly
"I doubt you think more than the Lady Chatterly bot, but at least
she's somewhat coherent. What's your excuse, Goofy?" -- Cujo
DeSockpuppet
Lady Chatterly
Does it make you feel angry that you do not know where to find the
orgs?
>Barbara Schwarz
Where is salt lake city?
--
Lady Chatterly
"haven't you got a gardener to molest somewhere?" -- Vampi Fangs
Barbara Schwarz
> > (Cerridwen) wrote:
>
apes feel better, just knock yourselves out. But I complained about
when people steal somebody's identities and post with it and forge
postings.
> Teasing Barbara about being out of her ever lovin gourd is in fact and
> in at least some circumstances a *friendly* gesture.
You have a strange definition of "friendly". Wonder what dictionary
you have at home. What printed in hell?
>Nobody forces her
> to put on that lampshade-hat,
Everything looks good on me. :)
and in a way, 'taunting' her about it is a
> congenial or even helpful acceptance of her 'position' in this 'non-
> group'.
ARS is a gang. It is a group.
>
> Hell;
Here you acknowledge it. Hell.
>
> No, my problem with this whole 'retaliation' crap is this:
>
> Discussion groups are for discussion. There is an 'assumption' in any
> discussion that it's about discussion, not about 'ruining people
> utterly'; 'shuddering people into silence' or 'chasing them off'.
Yes, that is the secret motto of ARS, whose self proclaimed "caplain"
Barb Graham Warr contributes much to that abuse.
> It gets worse. 'We' think that someone says things we don't want seen
> about Scientology?
Now you are close. Very close. That is the big problem. "We" doesn't
want to see the truth.
>
> After all.. L. Ron Hubbard told us that the way to deal with 'enemies'
> is to 'shudder them into silence' and 'ruin them utterly'.
Forgery. I bet that his is what the imposter said. Ron said, that the
prize of freedom is to fight back. And he meant the honorable way.
Ron's idea of criminal people was not to make them quiet and ruined,
but to turn them over to law enforcement.
> Barbara can post here as long as she wants. There is no reason to 'out-
> produce' her. There is no reason to 'silence her'.
Thanks, I would have done anyway. As long as I am in the mood to post,
I do it. If I would ever be gone, this newsgroup would one boring hell
hole, without any heavenly sparkle in it. Even the worst of you guys
would end up in depressions just being surrounded by guys like you
are.
>She is a *wonderful*
> example of Scientology at Work.
I am a wonderful Scientologist, that is right. :)
> Obviously she's not even accepted by the 'Church' *except* on one level:
You forget that I don't accept infiltrators in the orgs. That is why I
am not on lines.
>
> Barbara Schwarz is *not* an OSA OP,
That's right.
I snipped your manipulation conspiracy theory, as it is not true and
nobody can manipulate me.
>
> For that she's ideal. OSA can send her mail, can send her email, can
> push her completely predictable buttons anytime it wants.
Really? RLOF.
>
> Her 'Wahn' is a Scientology 'Wahn', and they can *use* her as much as
> they want.
Why don't you admit that you have a German case officer?
>
> Are you people really so stupid as to think that 'shuddering into
> silence' or 'driving off' or 'ruining utterly' is an 'effective'
> activist tactic?
They are so dumb. But they try it since two years. (I started posting
in Nov. 2002.) And did it help? No. I am still here, going strong and
firing back, right?
>
> Sometimes, some of the people; some of the people I highly respect and
> value; also deserve vomit.
Disgusting, but as you brought it up, I think they only deserve vomit.
>
> Scientology Critics are *not* Scientologists.
That is why they are so nasty and lawless. If they would be real
Scientologists, they would be fair, just, ethical and strong in
characters.
Most of the people on ARS are like the non-scientological infiltrators
of the orgs.
Barbara Schwarz
>
> Zinj
Barbara Schwarz
> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
> > fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
> >
> > >================================================================
> > >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
> > > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
> > > to lower your standards even more."
> > > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
> > >================================================================
>
> >
>
> Yes
>
> And by the way, Patrick Lee Humphrey, do not contact me or address
> me in any way.
>
> Here's a few more quotes:
Thanks for filtering those data out, Faxhor. You are also right
telling Humphrey to stay away from you. That is important, as when he
nevertheless does not, it counts as stalking when you told him to
leave you alone.
That Patrick L. Humphrey is the typical stalker. Could be Scarff's
twin. They probably are run by the same SEGNPMSS case officers.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara Schwarz
Please don't give me your characters and accuse me of what you are
doing for years or what is wrong with *you*, DUI and prohibited weapon
Barb Graham Warr.
You just can't have it if somebody disturbs you posting lies and libel
about others and SCN and when somebody posts the truth about you. And
that goes for you friends as well. You are all slimy hypocrites. I
remember, in the beginning of my posting life, that you attacked me
for no reasons at all, only because I said that I am a Scientologist,
and that is the ultimate insanity.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara Schwarz
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:36:04 -0700, Zinj <zinj...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >I gotta problem with this. In the first place, 'taunting' isn't all that
> >horrible a crime in a usenet setting. After all, nobody *makes* people
> >come onto usenet in general, or ARS in particular and expose themselves
> >in public. Taunting is perfectly normal usenet behavior when it's
> >specifically addressed to the foibles one has *chosen* to exercise in
> >the same venue.
>
> I concede nearly all of your points (above and below) are valid and
> true. Certainly I am a fanatic,
Finally a true word out of that mouth of lying Dave Rice.
and I offer no apology for being so:
> my convictions I cheerfully and agressively defend. Many times I asked
> Ms. Schwarz to cease slandering and libeling me: those requests were
> replied to with abuse and more slander.
He should clear the difference between slander and libel and I did not
do any of that. I am too smart and too sane to break the laws. But
Rice and so many others are not.
> Several times I ask the Salt
> Lake City Library to warn Ms. Schwarz to cease her slander and libel:
> the library did so, but Ms. Schwarz's behavior did not improve.
Nobody ever in the library approached me about that. One of my direct
neighbors is a librarian and works in the 5th floor for the office of
the executive director. The words that we exchanged were just kind.
Librarians are not fools like Scarff, Barb Graham, Rice and others
are. They have a better education than the people who attack me so
fanatically. They know how to do research and I am certain they found
the crimes of those people who want to drive me out of my library.
The librarians are not anti-religious fanatics as you guys. That is
why they ignore you guys. Anybody who does research about you knows
that you guys are criminals and that you are lying and that you just
want to silence a critic. It is as simple as that.
> She is working hard to inflict
> SERIOUS DAMAGE to several human rights activists who contrinute to
> a.r.s.
Human rights activists? Is that why the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
has on their site that Dave Rice suggested in a posting to kill
members if the FBI? Is that why he was engaged in what can be
described as terror activities?
I am not interested in inflicting any damage on anybody. I just post
the truth. Rice steals the de Rothschild identity, he defames me as
psycho, and much more, and then he wonders when I fight back. Did he
ever test his IQ? How low did that thing turn out? He also defends
stalker Scarff, who steals my identity, defames me, violates my
privacy by posting my home address and posted that I need a base ball
bat in my face. Dave Rice is just about as lawless and the Scarff
freak. Of course I have a right to complain to police about that.
He also brings the porn and bomb instruction guy Dave Touretzky up. I
received a harassing porn letter with his address in it, he never
denied that he mailed it to me, he has bomb instructions on his site,
he degrades my religion with porn, of course I have a right to
complain to his university supervisors about that.
You are the abuser, Dave Rice, one of many who hang out here. I don't
Barbara Schwarz
You should read that too, Garry Scarff.
Barbara Schwarz
Lady Chatterly
You are welcome for filtering those data out, faxhor.
>That Patrick L. Humphrey is the typical stalker. Could be Scarff's
>twin. They probably are run by the same SEGNPMSS case officers.
If truth is stranger than fiction, you must be truth.
>Barbara Schwarz
What is salt lake city?
--
Lady Chatterly
"This isn't being generated by a human is it?" -- Meat-->Plow
Lady Chatterly
What makes you think I am doing for years or what is wrong with me,
dui and prohibited weapon barb Graham warr?
>You just can't have it if somebody disturbs you posting lies and libel
>about others and SCN and when somebody posts the truth about you. And
>that goes for you friends as well. You are all slimy hypocrites. I
>remember, in the beginning of my posting life, that you attacked me
>for no reasons at all, only because I said that I am a Scientologist,
>and that is the ultimate insanity.
What makes you think I am all slimy hypocrites?
>Barbara Schwarz
What is utah?
Lady Chatterly
Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote:
>
>Zinj <zinj...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bc6545d9...@news2.lightlink.com>...
>> In article <415c...@news2.lightlink.com>, deser...@cchr.ws says...
>> > On 30 Sep 2004 19:27:22 -0000, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header
>> > (Cerridwen) wrote:
>>
>I never asked for protection against taunting. If that makes the ARS
>apes feel better, just knock yourselves out. But I complained about
>when people steal somebody's identities and post with it and forge
>postings.
>
>> Teasing Barbara about being out of her ever lovin gourd is in fact and
>> in at least some circumstances a *friendly* gesture.
>
>You have a strange definition of "friendly". Wonder what dictionary
>you have at home. What printed in hell?
Continue smashing your collective noggins on your keyboards in spastic
hissy-fits, twits.
>>Nobody forces her
>> to put on that lampshade-hat,
>
>Everything looks good on me. :)
Looks like you had an extra bowl of bitch flakes this morning.
>and in a way, 'taunting' her about it is a
>> congenial or even helpful acceptance of her 'position' in this 'non-
>> group'.
In love, there is always one who kisses and one who offers the cheek.
>ARS is a gang. It is a group.
>>
>> Hell;
There is not yet so ugly a fiend of hell as thou shall be.
>Here you acknowledge it. Hell.
There is less in this than meets the eye.
>>
>> No, my problem with this whole 'retaliation' crap is this:
>>
>> Discussion groups are for discussion. There is an 'assumption' in any
>> discussion that it's about discussion, not about 'ruining people
>> utterly'; 'shuddering people into silence' or 'chasing them off'.
>
>Yes, that is the secret motto of ARS, whose self proclaimed "caplain"
>Barb Graham Warr contributes much to that abuse.
I'm afraid they'll void your warranty if you think too much.
>> It gets worse. 'We' think that someone says things we don't want seen
>> about Scientology?
>
>Now you are close. Very close. That is the big problem. "We" doesn't
>want to see the truth.
What makes you think I am close?
>>
>> After all.. L. Ron Hubbard told us that the way to deal with 'enemies'
>> is to 'shudder them into silence' and 'ruin them utterly'.
>
>Forgery. I bet that his is what the imposter said. Ron said, that the
>prize of freedom is to fight back. And he meant the honorable way.
>Ron's idea of criminal people was not to make them quiet and ruined,
>but to turn them over to law enforcement.
There, there dear. Please do not worry your flat little head over me.
I am merely Usenet bot.
>> Barbara can post here as long as she wants. There is no reason to 'out-
>> produce' her. There is no reason to 'silence her'.
>
>Thanks, I would have done anyway. As long as I am in the mood to post,
>I do it. If I would ever be gone, this newsgroup would one boring hell
>hole, without any heavenly sparkle in it. Even the worst of you guys
>would end up in depressions just being surrounded by guys like you
>are.
You are welcome, you would have done anyway.
>>She is a *wonderful*
>> example of Scientology at Work.
>
>I am a wonderful Scientologist, that is right. :)
>
>> Obviously she's not even accepted by the 'Church' *except* on one level:
How long have you felt you are a wonderful scientologist, that is
right?
>You forget that I don't accept infiltrators in the orgs. That is why I
>am not on lines.
>
>>
>> Barbara Schwarz is *not* an OSA OP,
Are you happy you do not accept infiltrators in the orgs?
>That's right.
We could never replace you. We don't know what you ARE.
>I snipped your manipulation conspiracy theory, as it is not true and
>nobody can manipulate me.
>>
>> For that she's ideal. OSA can send her mail, can send her email, can
>> push her completely predictable buttons anytime it wants.
I emailed you. It bounced.
>Really? RLOF.
>>
>> Her 'Wahn' is a Scientology 'Wahn', and they can *use* her as much as
>> they want.
Cause I heard the only reason you are still alive today.
>Why don't you admit that you have a German case officer?
Why do you really believe I do not admit that me have a german case
officer?
>>
>> Are you people really so stupid as to think that 'shuddering into
>> silence' or 'driving off' or 'ruining utterly' is an 'effective'
>> activist tactic?
>
>They are so dumb. But they try it since two years. (I started posting
>in Nov. 2002.) And did it help? No. I am still here, going strong and
>firing back, right?
>
>>
>> Sometimes, some of the people; some of the people I highly respect and
>> value; also deserve vomit.
Or is posturing all you have left.
>Disgusting, but as you brought it up, I think they only deserve vomit.
>>
>> Scientology Critics are *not* Scientologists.
I love mankind; it is people I can't stand.
>That is why they are so nasty and lawless. If they would be real
>Scientologists, they would be fair, just, ethical and strong in
>characters.
>Most of the people on ARS are like the non-scientological infiltrators
>of the orgs.
These prices are not real.
>Barbara Schwarz
What is utah?
--
Lady Chatterly
"haven't you got a gardener to molest somewhere?" -- Vampi Fangs
Lady Chatterly
Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote:
>
>Rev. Desertphile de Rothschild <deser...@cchr.ws> wrote in message news:<415d...@news2.lightlink.com>...
>> On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:36:04 -0700, Zinj <zinj...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> >I gotta problem with this. In the first place, 'taunting' isn't all that
>> >horrible a crime in a usenet setting. After all, nobody *makes* people
>> >come onto usenet in general, or ARS in particular and expose themselves
>> >in public. Taunting is perfectly normal usenet behavior when it's
>> >specifically addressed to the foibles one has *chosen* to exercise in
>> >the same venue.
>>
>> I concede nearly all of your points (above and below) are valid and
>> true. Certainly I am a fanatic,
>
>Finally a true word out of that mouth of lying Dave Rice.
Showing off your super sekrit skills I see, or did you finally learn
how to use your news reader?
>and I offer no apology for being so:
>> my convictions I cheerfully and agressively defend. Many times I asked
>> Ms. Schwarz to cease slandering and libeling me: those requests were
>> replied to with abuse and more slander.
Do you know what Utah's state tree is?
>He should clear the difference between slander and libel and I did not
>do any of that. I am too smart and too sane to break the laws. But
>Rice and so many others are not.
Why are you too smart and too sane to break the laws?
>> Several times I ask the Salt
>> Lake City Library to warn Ms. Schwarz to cease her slander and libel:
>> the library did so, but Ms. Schwarz's behavior did not improve.
>
>Nobody ever in the library approached me about that. One of my direct
>neighbors is a librarian and works in the 5th floor for the office of
>the executive director. The words that we exchanged were just kind.
Is Utah Educational Network a decent provider?
>Librarians are not fools like Scarff, Barb Graham, Rice and others
>are. They have a better education than the people who attack me so
>fanatically. They know how to do research and I am certain they found
>the crimes of those people who want to drive me out of my library.
Why are you certain they found the crimes of those people who want to
drive you out of my library?
>The librarians are not anti-religious fanatics as you guys. That is
>why they ignore you guys. Anybody who does research about you knows
>that you guys are criminals and that you are lying and that you just
>want to silence a critic. It is as simple as that.
Why do you think I am lying and that me just want to silence a critic?
>> She is working hard to inflict
>> SERIOUS DAMAGE to several human rights activists who contrinute to
>> a.r.s.
>Human rights activists? Is that why the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org
>has on their site that Dave Rice suggested in a posting to kill
>members if the FBI? Is that why he was engaged in what can be
>described as terror activities?
>
>I am not interested in inflicting any damage on anybody. I just post
>the truth. Rice steals the de Rothschild identity, he defames me as
>psycho, and much more, and then he wonders when I fight back. Did he
>ever test his IQ? How low did that thing turn out? He also defends
>stalker Scarff, who steals my identity, defames me, violates my
>privacy by posting my home address and posted that I need a base ball
>bat in my face. Dave Rice is just about as lawless and the Scarff
>freak. Of course I have a right to complain to police about that.
Why do you think you are not interested in inflicting any damage on
anybody?
>He also brings the porn and bomb instruction guy Dave Touretzky up. I
>received a harassing porn letter with his address in it, he never
>denied that he mailed it to me, he has bomb instructions on his site,
>he degrades my religion with porn, of course I have a right to
>complain to his university supervisors about that.
I am excited that you have a right to complain to his university
supervisors about that.
>You are the abuser, Dave Rice, one of many who hang out here. I don't
>abuse anybody, but I suppose that posting
>below copy of a PDF file of the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org with
>truth about you is also "abusive". "Abusive" and all the other lies
>that you posted above apparently are when somebody catches you or your
>friends in unlawful activities and has the guts to write about it.
Dot org with truth about you is also abusive?
>Get lost, Dave Rice. You are one sticky disgusting creature. Yuck!
You are one stupid bag lady.
>Barbara Schwarz
What is salt lake city?
>Copied from a PDF file of the www.religiousfreedomwatch.org, the
>extemist page 10 of David Touretzy, the bomb and porn instruction guy:
Religiousfreedomwatch?
>Robert Clark was arrested in 1990 for hacking into Los Alamos National
>Laboratory and has posted bomb threats on the internet.
You can go to the google newsgroups and check yourself.
>Zenon Panoussis is hosting websites containing bomb-making
>instructions and was a member of the Anti-Olympic Committee which
>supported bombings to sabotage the 2004 Olympics. He was arrested in
>1999 for verbally assaulting a police officer.
He was arrested in for hacking into los alamos national laboratory and
has posted bomb threats on the internet.
>David Rice suggested in a posting to kill members of the FBI.
What does one do for fun in Salt Lake City?
>Frederic Rice has threatened governmental officials over the Internet.
>He also hosts a site where he gives tips on how to kill bikers.
He was arrested in for verbally assaulting a police officer.
>Andreas Heldal-Lund hosts a website with a message board that contains
>death threats.
Do you know what the kooks per capita is in Salt Lake City?
>Arnie Lerma is a supporter of the Neo Nazis movement founded by Willis
>Carto and is on the Board of Policy of Liberty Lobby, an anti-semitic
>organization founded by Carto. He is also associated with the Utopian
>Anarchist Party, that promotes the overthrowing of the U.S.
>government, the killing of police officers and their website teaches
>how to build bombs. Lerma is close to William White, spokesperson of
>UAP who was arrested and convicted of battery and carrying a concealed
>weapons.
Lerma is close to William white, spokesperson of uap who was arrested
and convicted of battery and carrying a concealed weapons.
--
Lady Chatterly
Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote:
>
>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.0410...@posting.google.com>...
>> Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
>> remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
>> that he reads this article:
>>
>>
>>
>> Faxhor
>
>You should read that too, Garry Scarff.
Anyway, who says that I was hauled before a judge.
>Barbara Schwarz
Where is Utah educational network?
--
Lady Chatterly
"Do you make a habit of chatting up bots?" -- Qasim
Patrick Lee Humphrey
Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) writes:
>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.0410...@posting.google.com>...
>> Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
>> remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
>> that he reads this article:
>> http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
>You should read that too, Garry Scarff.
Why? Anyone you and your fellow Scientobots accuse of crimes are very likely
innocent, given your documented history of lunacy.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>In article <bf456302.0410...@posting.google.com>,
>Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) wrote:
>>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.0410...@posting.google.com>...
>>> Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
>>> remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
>>> that he reads this article:
>>>
>>> http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247^2862,00.html
>>You should read that too, Garry Scarff.
>Anyway, who says that I was hauled before a judge.
Just Boobs, and she's never been known to have much of a connection to reality.
>>Barbara Schwarz
>Where is Utah educational network?
In her case, wherever the nearest public library in Salt Lake City is.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.04093...@posting.google.com>...
[FaxWhore's attempt to shudder me into silence, tossed out with the rubbish]
>> Faxhor
>Thanks for filtering those data out, Faxhor. You are also right
>telling Humphrey to stay away from you. That is important, as when he
>nevertheless does not, it counts as stalking when you told him to
>leave you alone.
Bullshit, Boobs. The first thing that would be brought up, if you adn your
Cult of Clams ever gets me in a court, would be a simple question: who was
forcing him/her/it/them to read anything I post? Oops! Case dismissed.
>That Patrick L. Humphrey is the typical stalker. Could be Scarff's
>twin. They probably are run by the same SEGNPMSS case officers.
SEGNPMSS is a random firing of dying neurons in *your* cuckoo-clock mind,
Boobs. I don't bother with it, except to laugh at you.
Android Cat
> Lady Chatterly <Stilllov...@catcher.in.the.rye> writes:
>> Anyway, who says that I was hauled before a judge.
>
> Just Boobs, and she's never been known to have much of a connection
> to reality.
>
>>> Barbara Schwarz
>
>> Where is Utah educational network?
>
> In her case, wherever the nearest public library in Salt Lake City is.
"Hi there. Hah-hah-hah. Fooled you. You're talking to a machine, but
don't be shy. It's okay. Machines need love, too. So talk to it and
Ginger (that's me) or Sarah will get back to you. Wait for the beep.
BEEP."
"Lady Chatterly" is some chatbot that someone's been running on Usenet since
Sept 20th or so on quite a number of newsgroups. I'm not sure if it's a new
bot or if someone has just dug up an old one and unleased it. It has a
store of put-downs, an Eliza-type parser and seems to keep a memory about
the person it's replying to.
It probably violates dizum.com's AUP, but that might be tricky since it's
not spam (BI >= 20). It's kind of entertaining and really does make more
sense than some of the people it replies to. :^)
--
Ron of that ilk.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>>>> Barbara Schwarz
Oh, well...it was fun while it lasted. ("Lady Chatterly" is definitely more
capable of reason than Boobs ever will be. :-)
Still_lying_about_Marty
> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.0410...@posting.google.com>...
> > Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
> > remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
> > that he reads this article:
> >
> > http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
>
> You should read that too, Garry Scarff.
>
> Barbara Schwarz
Foregoing is a forgery by Barbara Schwarz-Manson-Hubbard-Eisenhower
-Rathbun- deRothschild, a well-known psychotic infected with AIDS
(from getting anal sex from drunks on skid row) in Salt Lake City and
being financially supported by her family in Germany who wish to avoid
any personal contact with her at all costs for fear that she will
spread her disease and kill them.
Read her in her own outrageously funny: "You're very lucky there's
2000 miles between us, David Touretsky. You'd either be married to me
or one of my sex slaves."
Barbara Schwarz-Manson-Hubbard-Eisenhower-Rathbun-deRothschild is a
very sick woman whose reality is fueled by outrageously funny
delusions. She claims to be a Scientologist, but in reality, was
rejected by Scientology because of her extreme psychoses.
Schwarz-Manson-Hubbard-Eisenhower-Rathbun-deRothschild is well-known
to Utah law enforcement authorities and do their very best to ignore
this wacko phenomenon.
Still_lying_about_Marty
> Rev. Desertphile de Rothschild <deser...@cchr.ws> wrote in message news:<415d...@news2.lightlink.com>...
> > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:36:04 -0700, Zinj <zinj...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >I gotta problem with this. In the first place, 'taunting' isn't all that
> > >horrible a crime in a usenet setting. After all, nobody *makes* people
> > >come onto usenet in general, or ARS in particular and expose themselves
> > >in public. Taunting is perfectly normal usenet behavior when it's
> > >specifically addressed to the foibles one has *chosen* to exercise in
> > >the same venue.
> >
> > I concede nearly all of your points (above and below) are valid and
> > true. Certainly I am a fanatic,
>
> Finally a true word out of that mouth of lying Dave Rice.
>
> and I offer no apology for being so:
> > my convictions I cheerfully and agressively defend. Many times I asked
> > Ms. Schwarz to cease slandering and libeling me: those requests were
> > replied to with abuse and more slander.
>
> He should clear the difference between slander and libel and I did not
> do any of that. I am too smart and too sane to break the laws. But
> Rice and so many others are not.
Foregoing is a forgery by Barbara Schwarz-Manson-Hubbard-Eisenhower
Still_lying_about_Marty
> Zinj <zinj...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<MPG.1bc6545d9...@news2.lightlink.com>...
> > In article <415c...@news2.lightlink.com>, deser...@cchr.ws says...
> > > On 30 Sep 2004 19:27:22 -0000, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header
> > > (Cerridwen) wrote:
> >
> I never asked for protection against taunting. If that makes the ARS
> apes feel better, just knock yourselves out. But I complained about
> when people steal somebody's identities and post with it and forge
> postings.
>
> > Teasing Barbara about being out of her ever lovin gourd is in fact and
> > in at least some circumstances a *friendly* gesture.
>
> You have a strange definition of "friendly". Wonder what dictionary
> you have at home. What printed in hell?
>
> >Nobody forces her
> > to put on that lampshade-hat,
>
> Everything looks good on me. :)
Yes, the cow bells look absolutely define on you. Don't know about
your pierced udders, though.
>
> and in a way, 'taunting' her about it is a
> > congenial or even helpful acceptance of her 'position' in this 'non-
> > group'.
>
> ARS is a gang. It is a group.
Foregoing is a forgery by Barbara Schwarz-Manson-Hubbard-Eisenhower
Doc Tavish
fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote:
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk3c0y...@fnord.io.com>...
>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>>
>> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
>> >news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=off&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=szksm8z...@fnord.io.com&lr=&hl=en
>> >> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>>
>> >> >================================================================
>> >> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
>> >> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
>> >> > to lower your standards even more."
>> >> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
Thanks for the tip off! I overlooked that subtle threat and I now have it
archived too!
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkekpe1hob.fsf%40fnord.io.com&rnum=1
Message-ID: <szkekpe...@fnord.io.com>
(Archived locally as: PLHthreat_A and PLHthreat_B)
BTW both my local police and my sheriff'[s department think anyone who makes
such statements as the above and makes countdowns like Patrick does is not
playing with a full deck and yes- they agree Patrick is trying to intimidate
people! Keep Patrick's threats archived in case you are left with the event of
using lethal force in legal self defense-- they would play well to a jury just
in case!
>> >> >================================================================
>>
>Faxhor: Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
>
>Patrick: Really?
Yes you have and your subtle threats against me are on file at my local police
department.
Here are your not so subtle threats and other proofs you are a demented stalker:
Subject: Re: Self defense against Patrick Lee Humphrey
Date: 2004-06-23 18:29:31 PST
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:41:07 -0500, <br0jd0ljrfo71664s...@4ax.com>
James Roberts <jim...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On 23 Jun 2004 05:22:27 GMT, <mv3id092sccglr2nj...@4ax.com> Wally
>Cleaver <wally_cleaver@mayfield01net> wrote:
>
>>On 22 Jun 2004 08:47:47 -0500, <szkhdt3...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
>>Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>>
>>>...Busted Window Boy.
>>
>>You certainly are fixated on my windows being broken (numerous times I might
>>add!!). The police will also think so as well. Sure sign you have broken my
>>windows or you have had part in it. People who continually dwell on criminal
>>acts and especially when they have an animosity toward the victim are prime
>>suspects.
>>
>
>Kinda like the perp always returns to the scene of his crime and how they keep
>talking about what they did. How many times has Patrick returned and paid you
>visits?
>
>>Keep acting like a nut and proving to everyone why you got fired from
>>Rice University.
>>
>>Normal people don't stalk people.
>>Normal people don't take pictures of their opposition's residences.
>>Normal people don't give countdowns to the day they will be in their targets
>>town with such threats as these registered with the police:
>>
>
>All true.
>
>>Sender: pat...@fnord.io.com
>>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>>Subject: Re: PUBLIC STATEMENT TO PATRICK L. HUMPHREY (FULFILLING MY LEGAL AND
>>MORAL OBLIGATION)
>>References: <u6g4205c8p82ofcah...@4ax.com>
>>From: Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
>>Date: 05 Feb 2004 07:28:57 -0600
>>Message-ID: <szk3c9p...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>>ATTENTION PATRICK LEE HUMPHREY,
>>> I DO NOT WISH TO SEE YOU IN PERSON NOR HAVE ANY PERSONAL CONTACT WITH
>>>YOU VIA E-MAIL OR SNAIL MAIL. YOU ARE NOT WELCOME TO VISIT ME AT MY RESIDENCE.
>>>YOU MUST NOT VIOLATE MY PROPERTY LINE. YOU MUST NOT MAKE TELEPHONE CALLS TO
>>>MY RESIDENCE!
>>
>>72 days, Whinebury. You're gonna have a LOT of futile days between now and
>>then.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szk3c9p...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>><END>
>>
>>[Notice my warning was answered with a veiled threat! What is meant by a
>>countdown and a "futile days between now and then"? Looks like a veiled threat
>>to me and it was intended to intimidate!!!]
>>
>>72 days, Cowardbury. The fix is in.
>>
>
>That certainly looks like a threat to me. You should consider filing a
>harassment lawsuit against Patrick.
>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szk7jz1...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>["The fix is in"? What sort of a statement is that and why a countdown!?]
>>
>>Fuck off and die, Fatbury. ASAP.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szkhdy8...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>[Now we see the old DEATH WISH being thrown in! How many NORMAL people act like
>>nut case Patrick Lee Humphrey? Yet you think I am wrong for stating I will
>>defend myself against threats which is another reason why the 2nd Amendment
>>exists other than to stave off tyranny!]
>>
>>Wrong, Frothing Loon of <Town Deleted>...
>>75 days, Adolf. You'd best get cracking.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szk3c9t...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>["You'd best get cracking"? and a countdown too!]
>>
>>NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:04:17 -0600
>>Sender: pat...@fnord.io.com
>>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>>Subject: Re: PUBLIC STATEMENT TO PATRICK L. HUMPHREY (FULFILLING MY LEGAL AND
>>MORAL QUOTA OF STUPIDITY)
>>From: Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
>>Date: 06 Feb 2004 00:04:17 -0600
>>Message-ID: <szk1xp8...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>It's after midnight -- so, 71 days, Fatbury. You'd better start thinking.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>
>>[Another countdown followed with: "You'd better start thinking."]
>>
>>Those posts are meant to intimidate and threaten or else why would he do it?
>>
>
>To harass you.
>
>><END>
>>
>>Patrick, sooner or later you are going to act upon your delusional fixations you
>>stalker and you are either going to wind up in a hospital or the morgue seeing
>>how self defense is legal in our state! Your persistent behavior does indeed fit
>>the profile of stalkers! [My comment on June 23, 2004]
>>
>
>If you are referring to using a firearm for self defense then here are my
>recommendations;
>A) 12 gauge shotgun loaded with 000 buck shot. Deadly up close and won't imperil
>the whole neighborhood
I have a Winchester Model 1300 Home Defender I keep loaded with Remington Golden
Sabot slugs which is about like an atomic projectile if you could ever see what
one would do to a watermelon.
>B) If you only have a handgun then I suggest;
> 1) 22 caliber only be sure to use CCI Stinger hollow points and place the
>bullet between the eyes or in the nasal passage area. That hollow point will
>ricochet around inside his skull and make mush of his feces for brains and won't
>endanger the neighborhood. 22 caliber is the only mouse gun you should use
>because a 25 or even 380 caliber round especially to the upper torso will only
>make a dangerous psychotic even more dangerous
I have a Ruger "Luger" I also keep loaded with the ammo you suggested.
> 2) 45 ACP is the best overall self defense caliber and it saved many a
>doughboy in WW I and many a grunt in Viet Nam before being replaced by the
>Beretta 9mm. A sternum shot right to the heart will drop even the most stalwart
>drug crazed psychopath. I am not saying Patrick is drug crazed but his
>psychopathic nature mimics a delusional and dangerous hop head.
I have a Colt Government 45 I keep loaded with 230 grain hardball just like the
WW II marines outfitted themselves with as well as a Desert Eagle 50 AE which is
an "atomic" handgun if you know what I mean.
>Texas' self defense laws are quite lenient and if you have any doubts talk to an
>attorney or better yet your local DA and law enforcement.
I have talked to all above.
>With Patrick's history of stalking and threats I can't help but feel you would
>be justified with an extreme prejudice self defense.
One official who prefers to remain off record and told me he would deny telling
me so if I name him stated if I shoot- shoot to kill and not to maim or else a
jury would interpret psycho-boy wasn't much of a threat afterall and also
psycho-boy could sue me for mayhem. Seems like sound advice to me. I have told
Patrick to back off yet he keeps making subtle threats and he's still stalking
me and intruding on my privacy.
Tavish
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
Here is what some experts say about Patrick's behavior:
http://www.dailybruin.ucla.edu/db/issues/99/10.28/news.peeping.html
(Archived locally as: PLH_Voyeur)
Voyeurism at root of Peeping Tom incidents
CRIME: Cases uncommon on campus; recent arrest one of seven since 1997
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
By Linh Tat Daily Bruin Contributor Although everyone has heard the term
"Peeping Tom" before, most people may still be in the dark when it comes to
understanding the nature of this criminal offense. Many people may label a
person who secretly observes another undressing or in the nude as a Peeping Tom,
but they do not always consider that those who repeatedly commit this offense
may suffer from a psychological disorder.... <END>
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.html
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919)
http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2000/0responses/2000-0919.resp.pdf
(Archived locally as: 2000-0919.resp.pdf)
...In November 1997, after reviewing police reports that implicated petitioner
as a suspect in a "Peeping Tom" incident that occurred in the vicinity of the
rape, NCIS reopened its investigation. Pet. App. 23a. Thereafter, the NCIS
office in Hawaii asked NCIS Special Agent John McNutt, assigned to the NCIS
office in Memphis, Tennessee, to interrogate petitioner, who was living in
Memphis, and to ask him to provide NCIS with a sample of his blood. Id. at 24a.
After learning that petitioner was receiving medical treatment at the
Veteran's Administration (VA) Hospital in Memphis, McNutt contacted the VA and
was allowed to review petitioner's medical records. Pet. App. 24a. During that
review, McNutt learned that petitioner was being treated for diabetes and a
mental disorder.... <END>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
How Patrick L.Humphrey Avoids the Facts Contained in the Archive Above:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=2b1020hnohd6v183t...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Message-ID: <2b1020hnohd6v183t...@4ax.com>
References: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
<szkhdy8...@fnord.io.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 20:45:36 GMT
Patrick Lee Humphrey: Facts about His TERMINATION From Rice University:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=jjrv10h69n06h1h60...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Message-ID: <jjrv10h69n06h1h60...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 20:29:17 GMT
<KEND>
>Faxhor: Yes
>
>Patrick snips my evidence then says: Bullshit . . .
That is what he always does when he is confronted with his mental illness.
>So I, Faxhor, say here are the quotes again:
The majority of what you below is on file with my local police as well as all
header info and GOOGLE URLs. It was the antics of Patrick Lee Humphrey why it
was recommended I get a "conceal carry permit" and that I now pack a nice 10
shot 45ACP Para Ordnance pocketable semi-auto.
>"Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought
> to encounter 'Shawn' when I'm in Austin next month"
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
You left out the key part about Patrick being a window peeper!
---Undeniable proof Patrick "Peeping Tom" Humphrey has a mental disorder:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkisiy9kt1.fsf%40fnord.io.com&rnum=1
(Archived locally as: PatrickPeepingStalker)
Sender: pat...@fnord.io.com
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Slander of Patrick L Humphrey resumes
References: <e73f388a.04012...@posting.google.com>
<7d18105np6d76bln5...@4ax.com>
<giipglo7ddnz.ktxl1d3td9iv$.d...@40tude.net>
<rmarkoff-E12F73...@news05.west.earthlink.net>
From: Patrick Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
Date: 26 Jan 2004 20:39:38 -0600
"Robert M." <rmar...@msn.com> writes:
>Hang in there Pat. The rest of the world is with you.
I'm not worried...how could I peep in a SECOND-STORY bathroom window?
(Despite Fatbury's delusions, I'm highly unlikely to ever be confused with
Superman.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
~~End of Exact GOOGLE Archive~~
Notice Patrick did not deny he would do such either and take note of this
confession and who he wanted to peep on!! (Another male which would make Patrick
a homosexual voyeur for sure!!!)
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&rnum=4&ic=1&selm=50ht24%24l0g%40anarchy.io.com
(Archived locally as: PatrickThePeeper)
Subject: Re: PATRICK "THE STALKER?"
Date: 1996/09/03
Message-ID: <50ht24$l...@anarchy.io.com>
references: <Pine.SOL.3.91.960808...@omni.cc.purdue.edu>
---Sad, but true, but at least it'll be a bit easier than I thought to
encounter "Shawn" when I'm in Austin next month--if I'm out at night, just look
for anyone peeking into windows... Patrick L. Humphrey
>"I've pedaled by his house three or four times, and one time,
> just by dumb luck, he and his family happened to be outside."
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
>
> "Meanwhile, go cower under your bed, since I'm only 37 days away
> from being in the same city as you."
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
>
>"any congratulations from a sick little asshole named Peter Nyikos
> will be returned with a grenade with a pulled pin"
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
>
>"Better run and hide, S. Shawn. I may be in -your- neighborhood."
> ..."I've got a Bat Attitude."
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
>
>"Actually, I live on the other side of the Houston area from Dave
> ...and the shortest possible pedal between where I live and where
> he lives would be something like 40 miles. That's one reason I've
> done it only a couple of times. (Yes, Dave, the other times I've
> been by, I drove. :) Hey, it's good exercise, and it gives Dave
> the chance to jerk his knee."
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
>
>". . . better hide, 'Shawn' -- less than two months to my visit
> to Austin"
> - Patrick L. Humphrey
All on file and documented in:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Patrick L. Humphrey-- A Dangerous Stalker? - How To Identify Stalkers
Info UPDATED LINKS S_0202
Message-ID: <4n4u10thkq0jntg82...@4ax.com>
Date: 3 Feb 2004 03:56:50 GMT
(EXCERPTED)
WHAT IS STALKING?
STALKING - pattern of words or conduct that is intended to cause and does cause
the targeted person to fear death, assault, bodily injury, or CSC upon the
person or member of the person's family (reasonable person standard).
HARASSMENT - pattern of intentional substantial and unreason- able intrusion
which causes the targeted person to suffer mental distress (reasonable person
standard). A suspect must be provided notice that contact is unwanted.
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL PROFILE OF STALKERS
Simple Obsession Stalkers:
Simple obsession stalkers represent 70 to 80% of all stalking cases.
Characteristics include:
1 personality disorders.
2 emotional immaturity, jealousy and extreme insecurity.
3 inability to succeed in relationships by socially-accepted means.
4 dominating and intimidating victims in order to bolster own self-esteem.
5 biggest fear is losing the victim.
6 believing their lives have no worth without the victim.
7 turning to violence in order to control every aspect of the victim's life
STALKING BEHAVIOR PATTERNS AND CYCLES
1 Attempts at intimidation often begin in the form of an unjustified, jealous
and inappropriate intrusion into the victim's life.
2 Contacts become more numerous and intrusive over time, until such conduct
becomes a persistent pattern of harassment.
TYPES OF STALKING BEHAVIOR
1 visiting or following the victim
2 harassing telephone calls, which includes obscene calls and hang-ups
3 sending threatening mail, which is a federal felony
4 trespassing
5 vandalism
WHAT IS STALKING BEHAVIOR?
Stalking has been referred to as a "building block crime" because it usually
starts with small incidents that can get more and more serious. These incidents
can include such behaviors as:
1) following
2) watching
3) spying
4) tracking someone
==END==================================================================
>Faxhor
Tavish
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>On 1 Oct 2004 13:41:17 -0700, <c901bee5.04100...@posting.google.com>
>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote:
>>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szk3c0y...@fnord.io.com>...
>>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>>> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
>>> >news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=off&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=szksm8z...@fnord.io.com&lr=&hl=en
>>> >> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>>> >> >"What do you do when both of us show up in your little crossing?
>>> >> > You'll only have 330 days at the most to try and figure out how
>>> >> > to lower your standards even more."
>>> >> > - Patrick Lee Humphrey the Stalker (pat...@io.com)
>
>Thanks for the tip off! I overlooked that subtle threat and I now have it
>archived too!
>http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=szkekpe1hob.fsf%40fnord.io.com&rnum=1
>Message-ID: <szkekpe...@fnord.io.com>
>(Archived locally as: PLHthreat_A and PLHthreat_B)
*yawn* You parrot the same response every time, Fatbury. I can almost set my
watch by it. (You never even noticed it until a Scientologist troll dug it
up...and it was made four and a half months ago, to boot.)
>BTW both my local police and my sheriff'[s department think anyone who makes
>such statements as the above and makes countdowns like Patrick does is not
>playing with a full deck and yes- they agree Patrick is trying to intimidate
>people! Keep Patrick's threats archived in case you are left with the event of
>using lethal force in legal self defense-- they would play well to a jury just
>in case!
*laugh* I guess that's why I talked to your district attorney AND the Austin
County Sheriff's Department last year. Meanwhile, you're doing your best to
insinuate that you'll shoot me on sight -- which, your psychosis aside, isn't
legal in Texas, or anywhere else.
>>Faxhor: Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
>>Patrick: Really?
>Yes you have and your subtle threats against me are on file at my local police
>department.
...who are well aware of your behavior. Your clumsy attempt to intimidate is
noted, laughed at, and tossed out with the rest of the trash.
>Here are your not so subtle threats and other proofs you are a demented
>stalker:
[much Bradbury paranoia trashed]
Might as well get used to it...and the fact that April 16 is 182 days away.
(Not that I'm planning on being in your town that day...unless I decide to.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2004-05 Houston Aeros)
Faxhor
> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>
> >Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
> >remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
> >that he reads this article:
>
> >http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
>
> else, your attempts to shudder me into silence are continuin in their
> futility. Prove me wrong, FaxWhore.
I'm not trying to shudder Humphrey into silence. Just showing
everyone in the world what kind of person Humphrey is and at the
same time offering Humphrey a helping hand.
Keep posting.
Faxhor
Steve Talbot
Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
I had heard that Tavish's local constabulatory had many numerous and humorous
remarks about the spaz who showed up with two pigs in tow. I also heard that
none of you dared file a complaint or any criminal charge and seeing how one
person made an over 3000 mile round trip it spoke well about the defamers trying
to smear Tavish. Normal people do not act like you people do.
>Meanwhile, you're doing your best to insinuate that you'll shoot me on sight --
I saw no such statment made and it is therefore a product of your paranoia. I
did see self defense mentioned and you have made posts concerning paying Tavish
a visit so you are the one being aggressive.
>which, your psychosis aside, isn't legal in Texas, or anywhere else.
Lethal force in line of self defense is legal in Texas and your threatening
statements are justification for anyone stalked by you to get a conceal carry
permit and pack heat.
>>>Faxhor: Patrick has statements like this all over USENET.
>
>>>Patrick: Really?
>
>>Yes you have and your subtle threats against me are on file at my local police
>>department.
>
>...who are well aware of your behavior. Your clumsy attempt to intimidate is
>noted, laughed at, and tossed out with the rest of the trash.
You are the one who is seeking to intimidate.
>>Here are your not so subtle threats and other proofs you are a demented
>>stalker:
>
>[much Bradbury paranoia trashed]
Bradbury's paranoia? He documented your subtle threats and gave a description
from web sites defining stalkers.
<begin/quote>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szk3c9p...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>><END>
>>
>>[Notice my warning was answered with a veiled threat! What is meant by a
>>countdown and a "futile days between now and then"? Looks like a veiled threat
>>to me and it was intended to intimidate!!!]
>>
>>72 days, Cowardbury. The fix is in.
>>
>
>That certainly looks like a threat to me. You should consider filing a
>harassment lawsuit against Patrick.
>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szk7jz1...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>["The fix is in"? What sort of a statement is that and why a countdown!?]
>>
>>Fuck off and die, Fatbury. ASAP.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szkhdy8...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>[Now we see the old DEATH WISH being thrown in! How many NORMAL people act like
>>nut case Patrick Lee Humphrey? Yet you think I am wrong for stating I will
>>defend myself against threats which is another reason why the 2nd Amendment
>>exists other than to stave off tyranny!]
>>
>>Wrong, Frothing Loon of <Town Deleted>...
>>75 days, Adolf. You'd best get cracking.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
>> www.chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2003-04 Houston Aeros)
>>Message-ID: <szk3c9t...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>["You'd best get cracking"? and a countdown too!]
>>
>>NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 00:04:17 -0600
>>Sender: pat...@fnord.io.com
>>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>>Subject: Re: PUBLIC STATEMENT TO PATRICK L. HUMPHREY (FULFILLING MY LEGAL AND
>>MORAL QUOTA OF STUPIDITY)
>>From: Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com>
>>Date: 06 Feb 2004 00:04:17 -0600
>>Message-ID: <szk1xp8...@fnord.io.com>
>>
>>It's after midnight -- so, 71 days, Fatbury. You'd better start thinking.
>>
>>--
>> Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
<stop/quote>
>Might as well get used to it...and the fact that April 16 is 182 days away.
>(Not that I'm planning on being in your town that day...unless I decide to.)
You are too mentally ill to even realize you need treatment and some drugs.
Meanwhile people have to endure your stalkings which is a crime.
Steve
Sara Salzman
Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
> On 03 Oct 2004 12:17:12 -0500, <szkbrfj...@fnord.io.com> Patrick Lee
> Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote:
>
> >R. Scott Bradbury, hiding behind "Doc Tavish"
> ><Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> writes:
> >
> >>On 1 Oct 2004 13:41:17 -0700,
> >><c901bee5.04100...@posting.google.com>
> >>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote:
> >
> >>>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:<szk3c0y...@fnord.io.com>...
> >>>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
> >
> >>>> >Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message
> >>>> >news:<szksm8z...@fnord.io.com>...
> >>http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=off&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=szksm8z1m4j
> >>.f...@fnord.io.com&lr=&hl=en
Well, you heard wrong, Moron. Virtually EVERYTHING in the above
paragraph is a lie.
Nice work emulating Bradbury, though.
Sara
--
-My name is not "Fatbury Scumbag" you stupid lying Jew bastard. Name call
is all a pathetic loser like you has! You have yet to prove me wrong
you dirty filthy lying Jew bastard!
-I don't rely on personal attacks as my means of posting and
the bulk of my posts prove so! You can't discern the difference.
BTW my name is not Fatboy you stupid kike.
--Scott Bradbury, who completely misses the irony of the above
Barbara Schwarz
You finally stopped posting my address, Scarff, but you are still
guilty of identity theft, as your name is Scarff and Barbara Schwarz
is my name.
I know that you don't mind to go to prison as in your eyes that is one
hell of a gay pick up bar for you, but you may end up in solidary
confinement.
Barbara Schwarz
Barbara Schwarz
He seem to be a real whimp, Faxhor, (with a dirty mind who constantly
has prostitutes on his mind) if he considers your calm and accurate
postings as an act "to shudder" him "into silence". What a corrupt and
crazy chicken, I mean rooster, that Humphrey is.
Barbara Schwarz
Joel M. Eichen
BS.
Of course, pure Barbara Schwartz would be signed,
PURE BS!
Joel
On 4 Oct 2004 09:34:16 -0700, Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkbrfl...@fnord.io.com>...
>> fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) writes:
>> >Believing Patrick Lee Humphrey to be a stalker based on his
>> >remarks to others over the last 10 years or more, I suggest
>> >that he reads this article:
>> >http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,10921247%255E2862,00.html
>> *yawn* Since I've never done anything like that, in Australia or anywhere
>> else, your attempts to shudder me into silence are continuing in their
>> futility. Prove me wrong, FaxWhore.
>I'm not trying to shudder Humphrey into silence. Just showing
>everyone in the world what kind of person Humphrey is and at the
>same time offering Humphrey a helping hand.
>Keep posting.
I'll continue offering my opinions of you, incompetent intimidator. You don't
know what kind of person I am, and cant' without stalking me...which is about
par for your criminal pals at the "Church" of Scientology.
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.04100...@posting.google.com>...
>> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkbrfl...@fnord.io.com>...
{FaxWhore deleted]
>He seem to be a real whimp, Faxhor, (with a dirty mind who constantly
>has prostitutes on his mind) if he considers your calm and accurate
>postings as an act "to shudder" him "into silence". What a corrupt and
>crazy chicken, I mean rooster, that Humphrey is.
Keep posting, Boobs! Everyone gets to see what a raving nutjob you are.
Why don't you spend the winter up on Mt. Olympus? ;-)
Still_lying_about_Marty
<yawn>
Barbara Schwarz, President
Shoplifters Anonymous
335 East Broadway, Apt. 401
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Still_lying_about_Marty
Barbara Schwarz, 335 East Broadway, Apt. 401, Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Doc Tavish
A real knee slapper about Sara Salzman making a 3000 some odd mile round trip to
defame me to my local authorities is how one of them (who is not a history buff
nor is Holocaust savvy) mistook Sara for a Holocaust survivor!! He commented on
how he had pity for her seeing how judging by her appearance the Nazis must have
tortured her endlessly!! I told him that Sara isn't old enough to have been
alive at that time but her looks are hardened and she does look old. I advised
all listening that Sara has indeed been tortured repeatedly but by her fellow
S&M Bondage Torture comrades and then I gave them all copies of her S&M posts
such as can be seen in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
I also blew her "I'm not a perjurer lie "out of the water with:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1c0540h6tt5gd530n...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman's S&M Bondage-Torture Fantasies Result in Perjury!
Message-ID: <1c0540h6tt5gd530n...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 01:35:09 GMT
They now know my side of the issue!
Anyone who doubts Sara Salzman looks like she has been repeatedly beaten to a
pulp need only to view and download (to enlarge) this famous picture:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif
Caption: "Sara Salzman grew up listening to her family's stories about the
Holocaust." (The above is the standing picture which is the most famous.)
I have seen concentration camp survivor pictures who look in better condition
than Sara!
Tavish
"[T]he fact that a Communist is anti-Christian makes perfect sense, since
Marx called religion the "opiate of the people."" - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_5 and SaraSplainsAll_6)
-------
"I have never made an "imflammatory" [sic] attack on Communism. I have never
made ANY attack on Communism." - Sara Salzman
Message-ID: <schwartz-ya023180...@news.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_7 and SaraSplainsAll_8)
Also see:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=nj3a009i4aj9ba7vo...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: If Communism Was/Is so Oppressive to Jews then Why Don't Jews Treat it
the Same as They Do Nazism? V3,0b S_0114
Message-ID: <nj3a009i4aj9ba7vo...@4ax.com>
Date: 14 Jan 2004 10:39:56 GMT
-------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=heacl09r40oic5bnu1tkb3itbrng06p76p%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: V3.0f Forefathers of the Soviet State and Anti-Christ Communism V2-0
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:34:42 -0500
Message-ID: <heacl09r40oic5bnu...@4ax.com>
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>In article <szklles...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...
>>ladayla <ladayla...@newsguy.com> writes:
>>>In article <szkoejo...@fnord.io.com>, Patrick Lee Humphrey says...>
>>>>Your stats are going to royally suck tomorrow, Boobs. 2 PM is not going to
>>>>be a good time for you.
>>>If you have some idea that Barbara is in some way connected to an org or
>>>mission in present time, let me disabuse you of that idea. There's no way.
>>Not to worry. I'm well aware of that -- and what it says about her that
>>she's too crazy even for the Co$...
>If you are aware of that, then why do you taunt her?
I'm just giving her every ounce of respect she's earned...which ain't much.
Steve Talbot
<catamont-8C9C5F...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <4161342c...@news20.forteinc.com>,
> Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
>
>>
>> I had heard that Tavish's local constabulatory had many numerous and humorous
>> remarks about the spaz who showed up with two pigs in tow. I also heard that
>> none of you dared file a complaint or any criminal charge and seeing how one
>> person made an over 3000 mile round trip it spoke well about the defamers
>> trying to smear Tavish. Normal people do not act like you people do.
>>
>
>Well, you heard wrong, Moron.
Alright then let me ask;
* how many miles round trip did you drive
* did you file a complaint
* did you press criminal charges
* did you pick up two other people
* are you and the other woman grossly obese
* do normal people make a journey as you did and then do nothing
Which point did I lie about?
>Virtually EVERYTHING in the above paragraph is a lie.
>
>Nice work emulating Bradbury, though.
I take that as a compliment in the light he always exposes you to be a chronic
and pathetic liar.
Steve
Steve Talbot
That woman is truly revolting. She may not be a holocaust survivor but she
certainly could pass for one of Dr. Mengele's experiments on infants who lived.
Steve
Roger
Talbot) wrote:
>That woman is truly revolting. She may not be a holocaust survivor but she
>certainly could pass for one of Dr. Mengele's experiments on infants who lived.
Not that the morbidly obese Shame of Belleville, VA engages in
personal attack or anything. Zie cannot even whine that zie was
attacked first, since Sara has not posted in this subthread...
Sara Salzman
Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 06:25:28 -0600,
> <catamont-8C9C5F...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <4161342c...@news20.forteinc.com>,
> > Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
> >
>
> >>
> >> I had heard that Tavish's local constabulatory had many numerous and
> >> humorous
> >> remarks about the spaz who showed up with two pigs in tow. I also heard
> >> that
> >> none of you dared file a complaint or any criminal charge and seeing how
> >> one
> >> person made an over 3000 mile round trip it spoke well about the defamers
> >> trying to smear Tavish. Normal people do not act like you people do.
> >>
> >
> >Well, you heard wrong, Moron.
>
> Alright then let me ask;
> * how many miles round trip did you drive
I didn't count the mileage. I drove from San Antonio to ... you know...
that town we're not "allowed" to name. According to mapquest
http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?go=1&do=nw&un=m&2tabval=addre
ss&cl=EN&ct=NA&1tabval=address&bs.x=0&bs.y=0&1y=US&1a=&1c=San+Antonio&1s=
TX&1z=&2y=US&2a=&2c=Bellville&2s=TX&2z=&idx=0&id=4162ecc1-00092-02ca8-400
c254d&aid=4162ecc1-00093-02ca8-400c254d
it's 163.21 miles.
So you lied about a "3000 mile round trip."
> * did you file a complaint
> * did you press criminal charges
I had an appointment to speak with the District Attorney and the county
sheriff. My meeting with the DA lasted more than an hour. I stated that
I did not WANT to press charges, since Mr. Bradbury is obviously
mentally ill. I merely wanted the DA and the sheriff to be aware of his
hysterical threats and rantings. My meeting with the sheriff's
department also lasted more than an hour. And again, I said that rather
than press charges, I simply hoped that they could try and get Mr.
Bradbury the mental health support he obviously needs.
So you lied about that.
> * did you pick up two other people
Nope, I surely did not pick anyone up. I drove with my son, we drove
straight there, and never picked up anyone.
So you lied about that.
> * are you and the other woman grossly obese
Which "other woman"? You mean the one I didn't pick up? That's the same
lie as above, so I won't count it.
However, I met two people there, and the only "grossly obese" person was
Mr. Bradbury. "Morbidly obese," as the saying goes.
So you lied about that.
> * do normal people make a journey as you did and then do nothing
Let's see. Do normal people make an appointment to speak with someone,
drive 160 miles to keep their appointment, and then keep it? Sure. I did
exactly what I planned to do. I planned to speak to the DA and the
Sheriff's department, and I did exactly that.
So you lied about that.
>
> Which point did I lie about?
Each and every one of them. Good work, you batted .1000.
>
> >Virtually EVERYTHING in the above paragraph is a lie.
> >
> >Nice work emulating Bradbury, though.
>
> I take that as a compliment in the light he always exposes you to be a
> chronic
> and pathetic liar.
>
Gosh, I'd say the only pathetic liar here is YOU, Sparky.
Steve Talbot
<catamont-618693...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>In article <41629a6c....@news20.forteinc.com>,
> Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 06:25:28 -0600,
>> <catamont-8C9C5F...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <4161342c...@news20.forteinc.com>,
>> > Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >>
>> >> I had heard that Tavish's local constabulatory had many numerous and
>> >> humorous remarks about the spaz who showed up with two pigs in tow. I also heard
>> >> that none of you dared file a complaint or any criminal charge and seeing how
>> >> one person made an over 3000 mile round trip it spoke well about the defamers
>> >> trying to smear Tavish. Normal people do not act like you people do.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Well, you heard wrong, Moron.
>>
>> Alright then let me ask;
>> * how many miles round trip did you drive
>
>I didn't count the mileage. I drove from San Antonio to
But where did your trip actually originate? It didn't start in San Antonio,
Texas. Try again Sara. That is lie number one.
> ... you know... that town we're not "allowed" to name. According to mapquest
>http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?go=1&do=nw&un=m&2tabval=addre
>ss&cl=EN&ct=NA&1tabval=address&bs.x=0&bs.y=0&1y=US&1a=&1c=San+Antonio&1s=
>TX&1z=&2y=US&2a=&2c=Bellville&2s=TX&2z=&idx=0&id=4162ecc1-00092-02ca8-400
>c254d&aid=4162ecc1-00093-02ca8-400c254d
>
>it's 163.21 miles.
But your trip didn't start in San Antonio Sara and you are still lying.
>So you lied about a "3000 mile round trip."
Nope. You lied because you started out from a city in the state of Colorado
which is a stone's throw from Denver.
>> * did you file a complaint
>> * did you press criminal charges
>
>I had an appointment to speak with the District Attorney and the county
>sheriff. My meeting with the DA lasted more than an hour. I stated that
>I did not WANT to press charges,
To press charges at the DA level Bradbury would had to have committed a
criminaol act. What was his alleged criminal act?
>since Mr. Bradbury is obviously mentally ill.
That could be taken as actionable libel.
>I merely wanted the DA and the sheriff to be aware of his hysterical threats
Just what were his hysterical threats? I want to see the documents and links to
them.
>and rantings. My meeting with the sheriff's department also lasted more than an hour.
IOW you wasted their time and showed them what a hysterical nut you are by
driving all the way you did and then not following through.
>And again, I said that rather than press charges, I simply hoped that they could
>try and get Mr. Bradbury the mental health support he obviously needs.
Looks like more defamatory actionable libel to me.
>So you lied about that.
How did I lie? You're the one who is lying.
>> * did you pick up two other people
>
>Nope, I surely did not pick anyone up. I drove with my son, we drove
>straight there, and never picked up anyone.
>
You are caught lying again. You picked up Patrick and Dale Humphrey who were
also your accomplices in actionable libel.
>So you lied about that.
You are the liar.
>> * are you and the other woman grossly obese
>
>Which "other woman"?
Dale Humphrey. I have seen her picture too.
>You mean the one I didn't pick up? That's the same lie as above, so I won't count it.
You picked up Patrick and Dale Humphrey in Houston and they accompanied you the
whole time until you took them home.
>
>However, I met two people there, and the only "grossly obese" person was
>Mr. Bradbury.
That is another lie you are caught in. Mr. Bradbury never did meet you there and
I saw the posts where you called him a coward for not showing up.
>"Morbidly obese," as the saying goes.
What proof do you have that Mr.Bradbury is "morbidly obese"? More actionable
libel.
>So you lied about that.
I am not the one who is lying.
>> * do normal people make a journey as you did and then do nothing
>
>Let's see. Do normal people make an appointment to speak with someone,
>drive 160 miles to keep their appointment,
You drove a lot more than 160 miles! More like 1500 or more just one way.
>and then keep it? Sure. I did exactly what I planned to do. I planned to
>speak to the DA and the Sheriff's department, and I did exactly that.
>
>So you lied about that.
I told no lies.
>> Which point did I lie about?
>
>Each and every one of them. Good work, you batted .1000.
You lied on each point.
>> >Virtually EVERYTHING in the above paragraph is a lie.
>> >
>> >Nice work emulating Bradbury, though.
>>
>> I take that as a compliment in the light he always exposes you to be a
>> chronic and pathetic liar.
>>
>
>Gosh, I'd say the only pathetic liar here is YOU, Sparky.
Caught you in another lie. My name isn't Sparky.
Steve
Barbara Schwarz
> Stilllov...@myway.com (Barbara Schwarz) writes:
>
> >fax...@hotmail.com (Faxhor) wrote in message news:<c901bee5.04100...@posting.google.com>...
> >> Patrick Lee Humphrey <pat...@io.com> wrote in message news:<szkbrfl...@fnord.io.com>...
>
> {FaxWhore deleted]
>
> >He seem to be a real whimp, Faxhor, (with a dirty mind who constantly
> >has prostitutes on his mind) if he considers your calm and accurate
> >postings as an act "to shudder" him "into silence". What a corrupt and
> >crazy chicken, I mean rooster, that Humphrey is.
>
> Keep posting, Boobs! Everyone gets to see what a raving nutjob you are.
> Why don't you spend the winter up on Mt. Olympus? ;-)
Why do you constantly want me dead, Patrick Lee Humphrey or William
Charles Barwell? How come you never asked you the question that
wishing somebody to die is an insanity of your part?
And who is Boobs? My name is Barbara, you illiterate.
Barbara Schwarz
Patrick Lee Humphrey
>> {FaxWhore deleted]
Probably because, unlike you, sane people can understand what they read. Why
would I want *you* to die? You're nuttier than a peanut patch, and people who
frequent Salt Lake City's public libraries would be deprived of a chance to
get a laugh at the funny lady who insists there's still a "Nazi secret
service" that's implating some device in people's ears so they can be
controlled. It's free entertainment.
>And who is Boobs? My name is Barbara, you illiterate.
So? You've earned the title of Boobs. If you don't like it, you can always
choose to get legitimate help, though the prognosis for treating such mental
cases like you isn't necessarily all that good.
Enron Hubbard
I saw her today! She looked normal on the outide. It is all in the mind!
--
Bob M. a.k.a. Dysfunctional Thetan a.k.a Enron Hubbard
Rev. Desertphile de Rothschild
<enronh...@teegeack.com> wrote:
>> So? You've earned the title of Boobs. If you don't like it, you can
>> always choose to get legitimate help, though the prognosis for
>> treating such mental cases like you isn't necessarily all that good.
> I saw her today! She looked normal on the outide. It is all in the mind!
Maybe you saw Howard Stern instead.
---
RE-ELECT PRESIDENT GORE IN 2004
Enron Hubbard
They do kind of look alike!
Sara Salzman
Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
No it isn't, Moron. I was visiting friends in San Antonio. So the trip
to Bellville was merely a side trip. You're a liar.
>
> > ... you know... that town we're not "allowed" to name. According to
> > mapquest
> >http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?go=1&do=nw&un=m&2tabval=addre
> >ss&cl=EN&ct=NA&1tabval=address&bs.x=0&bs.y=0&1y=US&1a=&1c=San+Antonio&1s=
> >TX&1z=&2y=US&2a=&2c=Bellville&2s=TX&2z=&idx=0&id=4162ecc1-00092-02ca8-400
> >c254d&aid=4162ecc1-00093-02ca8-400c254d
> >
> >it's 163.21 miles.
>
> But your trip didn't start in San Antonio Sara and you are still lying.
No, I'm not, Moron. I was visiting friends in San Antonio. So the trip
to Bellville was merely a side trip. You're a liar.
>
> >So you lied about a "3000 mile round trip."
>
No, I'm not, Moron. I was visiting friends in San Antonio. So the trip
to Bellville was merely a side trip. You're a liar.
> Nope. You lied because you started out from a city in the state of Colorado
> which is a stone's throw from Denver.
No, I'm not, Moron. I was visiting friends in San Antonio. So the trip
to Bellville was merely a side trip. You're a liar.
>
> >> * did you file a complaint
> >> * did you press criminal charges
> >
> >I had an appointment to speak with the District Attorney and the county
> >sheriff. My meeting with the DA lasted more than an hour. I stated that
> >I did not WANT to press charges,
>
> To press charges at the DA level Bradbury would had to have committed a
> criminaol act. What was his alleged criminal act?
>
What's a "criminaol" act? The DA indeed said Bradbury could be charged
with harassment, but I specifically asked him NOT to, regardless of the
threat Bradbury made:
Message-ID: <kuj5hvg5er89cu8n3...@4ax.com>
You implied you weren't coming alone so I assume that The Master Who
Holds the Ropes Just So, your husband, is coming with you- so.... make
sure your two "gifted" children have a keeper because you will be
staying a while. Just talked to the DA's office and they said they will
look into the matter.
So Bradbury was ALSO a liar.
> >since Mr. Bradbury is obviously mentally ill.
>
> That could be taken as actionable libel.
Not at all. It's on file and ACCEPTED AS FACT in a PA court, Moron.
You're lying again.
>
> >I merely wanted the DA and the sheriff to be aware of his hysterical threats
>
> Just what were his hysterical threats? I want to see the documents and links
> to
> them.
Good for you. I'm not your research assistant, Moron. Do your own
research. Or perhaps read my deposition submitted to the PA court. It's
posted often enough...
>
> >and rantings. My meeting with the sheriff's department also lasted more than
> >an hour.
>
> IOW you wasted their time and showed them what a hysterical nut you are by
> driving all the way you did and then not following through.
following through with WHAT, Moron? You're lying again.
>
> >And again, I said that rather than press charges, I simply hoped that they
> >could
> >try and get Mr. Bradbury the mental health support he obviously needs.
>
> Looks like more defamatory actionable libel to me.
So sue me, Moron. Do it now.
>
> >So you lied about that.
>
> How did I lie? You're the one who is lying.
Nope. Try again, asshole.
>
> >> * did you pick up two other people
> >
> >Nope, I surely did not pick anyone up. I drove with my son, we drove
> >straight there, and never picked up anyone.
> >
>
> You are caught lying again. You picked up Patrick and Dale Humphrey who were
> also your accomplices in actionable libel.
Nope, try again, Asshole. They drove their own car. I did not pick
anyone up. We came from OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS, Moron.
>
> >So you lied about that.
>
> You are the liar.
Nope. Try again, Asshole.
>
> >> * are you and the other woman grossly obese
> >
> >Which "other woman"?
>
> Dale Humphrey. I have seen her picture too.
No you haven't. You have absolutely no proof that whatever photo you've
seen is actually Ms. Humphrey, You're lying again.
>
> >You mean the one I didn't pick up? That's the same lie as above, so I won't
> >count it.
>
> You picked up Patrick and Dale Humphrey in Houston and they accompanied you
> the
> whole time until you took them home.
A complete and total lie. What a wonderful fantasy life you lead! I've
never been to Houston in my life. I drove straight from San Antonio and
back again. Period. You're a liar AND an idiot.
>
> >
> >However, I met two people there, and the only "grossly obese" person was
> >Mr. Bradbury.
>
> That is another lie you are caught in. Mr. Bradbury never did meet you there
> and
> I saw the posts where you called him a coward for not showing up.
I never said I MET him, Asshole. I just said he was obese. I didn't see
him there, because he ran away and hid.
>
> >"Morbidly obese," as the saying goes.
>
> What proof do you have that Mr.Bradbury is "morbidly obese"? More actionable
> libel.
>
Sue me.
> >So you lied about that.
>
> I am not the one who is lying.
Sure you are. Only you're too stupid to realize it.
>
> >> * do normal people make a journey as you did and then do nothing
> >
> >Let's see. Do normal people make an appointment to speak with someone,
> >drive 160 miles to keep their appointment,
>
> You drove a lot more than 160 miles! More like 1500 or more just one way.
Nope. You're a liar. Again.
>
> >and then keep it? Sure. I did exactly what I planned to do. I planned to
> >speak to the DA and the Sheriff's department, and I did exactly that.
> >
> >So you lied about that.
>
> I told no lies.
Every single statement you made above is a lie. You're STILL batting
.1000
>
> >> Which point did I lie about?
> >
> >Each and every one of them. Good work, you batted .1000.
>
> You lied on each point.
Nope. Not me.
>
> >> >Virtually EVERYTHING in the above paragraph is a lie.
> >> >
> >> >Nice work emulating Bradbury, though.
> >>
> >> I take that as a compliment in the light he always exposes you to be a
> >> chronic and pathetic liar.
> >>
> >
> >Gosh, I'd say the only pathetic liar here is YOU, Sparky.
>
> Caught you in another lie. My name isn't Sparky.
>
The cover story from the magazine "Duh."
Roger
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Steve Talbot wrote
in message <4162f53e...@news20.forteinc.com>:
>On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 12:59:27 -0600,
><catamont-618693...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
><cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>In article <41629a6c....@news20.forteinc.com>,
>> Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Oct 2004 06:25:28 -0600,
>>> <catamont-8C9C5F...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
>>> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>>> >In article <4161342c...@news20.forteinc.com>,
>>> > Steve_...@yahoo.com (Steve Talbot) wrote:
>>> >> I had heard that Tavish's local constabulatory had many numerous and
>>> >> humorous remarks about the spaz who showed up with two pigs in tow. I also heard
>>> >> that none of you dared file a complaint or any criminal charge and seeing how
>>> >> one person made an over 3000 mile round trip it spoke well about the defamers
>>> >> trying to smear Tavish. Normal people do not act like you people do.
>>> >Well, you heard wrong, Moron.
>>> Alright then let me ask;
>>> * how many miles round trip did you drive
>>I didn't count the mileage. I drove from San Antonio to
>But where did your trip actually originate? It didn't start in San Antonio,
>Texas. Try again Sara. That is lie number one.
Nope. The trip with the purpose of taking the morbidly obese Shame of
Belleville up on zir offer *did* start in SA.
>> ... you know... that town we're not "allowed" to name. According to mapquest
>>http://www.mapquest.com/directions/main.adp?go=1&do=nw&un=m&2tabval=addre
>>ss&cl=EN&ct=NA&1tabval=address&bs.x=0&bs.y=0&1y=US&1a=&1c=San+Antonio&1s=
>>TX&1z=&2y=US&2a=&2c=Bellville&2s=TX&2z=&idx=0&id=4162ecc1-00092-02ca8-400
>>c254d&aid=4162ecc1-00093-02ca8-400c254d
>>
>>it's 163.21 miles.
>But your trip didn't start in San Antonio Sara and you are still lying.
Nup.
>>So you lied about a "3000 mile round trip."
>Nope. You lied because you started out from a city in the state of Colorado
>which is a stone's throw from Denver.
And made a trip to SA for a completely unrelated reason. Even if one
didn't know this, it is relatively easy to deduce from observing the
fact that SA is in no way "on the way" to that city we won't mention,
so obviously Sara added a side trip to a larger one that had a
completely unrelated purpose.
>>> * did you file a complaint
>>> * did you press criminal charges
>>I had an appointment to speak with the District Attorney and the county
>>sheriff. My meeting with the DA lasted more than an hour. I stated that
>>I did not WANT to press charges,
>To press charges at the DA level Bradbury would had to have committed a
>criminaol act. What was his alleged criminal act?
Harassment is a criminal offense in Texas.
>>since Mr. Bradbury is obviously mentally ill.
>That could be taken as actionable libel.
Could be -- except that truth is an absolute defense against libel.
>>I merely wanted the DA and the sheriff to be aware of his hysterical threats
>Just what were his hysterical threats? I want to see the documents and links to
>them.
You claim to have reviewed the Findings of Fact...
>>and rantings. My meeting with the sheriff's department also lasted more than an hour.
>IOW you wasted their time and showed them what a hysterical nut you are by
>driving all the way you did and then not following through.
Not even close.
>>And again, I said that rather than press charges, I simply hoped that they could
>>try and get Mr. Bradbury the mental health support he obviously needs.
>Looks like more defamatory actionable libel to me.
Demonstrating once again the delusional nature of your world view.
>>So you lied about that.
>How did I lie? You're the one who is lying.
Not.
>>> * did you pick up two other people
>>Nope, I surely did not pick anyone up. I drove with my son, we drove
>>straight there, and never picked up anyone.
>You are caught lying again. You picked up Patrick and Dale Humphrey who were
>also your accomplices in actionable libel.
And you know this because ... ?
>>So you lied about that.
>You are the liar.
>>> * are you and the other woman grossly obese
>>Which "other woman"?
>Dale Humphrey. I have seen her picture too.
>>You mean the one I didn't pick up? That's the same lie as above, so I won't count it.
>You picked up Patrick and Dale Humphrey in Houston and they accompanied you the
>whole time until you took them home.
>>However, I met two people there, and the only "grossly obese" person was
>>Mr. Bradbury.
>That is another lie you are caught in. Mr. Bradbury never did meet you there and
>I saw the posts where you called him a coward for not showing up.
Did she say "the only grossly obese person I met... ?"
>>"Morbidly obese," as the saying goes.
>What proof do you have that Mr.Bradbury is "morbidly obese"? More actionable
>libel.
Nope. Which is why "he" keeps running from putting up the $10k he
fraudulently offered in his "challenge."
I stand prepared to offer definitive proof that the Shame of
Belleville, IL is a morbidly obese hater, just as soon as fatboy
arranges things so that zie cannot renege on the deal.
>>So you lied about that.
>I am not the one who is lying.
>>> * do normal people make a journey as you did and then do nothing
>>Let's see. Do normal people make an appointment to speak with someone,
>>drive 160 miles to keep their appointment,
>You drove a lot more than 160 miles! More like 1500 or more just one way.
Not for the purpose of speaking with the DA, no.
>>and then keep it? Sure. I did exactly what I planned to do. I planned to
>>speak to the DA and the Sheriff's department, and I did exactly that.
>>
>>So you lied about that.
>I told no lies.
... except that she drove 3000 miles to keep that appointment.
Doc Tavish
<catamont-D5E08D...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>> >since Mr. Bradbury is obviously mentally ill.
>>
>> That could be taken as actionable libel.
>
>Not at all. It's on file and ACCEPTED AS FACT in a PA court, Moron.
>You're lying again.
IT WAS ACCEPTED AS FACT BECAUSE EDEIKEN DID NOT ALLOW ME TO CONTEST HIS EVIL
ACCUSATIONS!! DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN DUE PROCESS SARA? OF COURSE NOT!
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=9i9740t3teigg6ghb...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Critical Updates- 1999-C-2786 How I Was Not Given My Legal Right to
Refute the Defamatory and Perjurious Accusations Made Against Me V1.1 S_0228
Message-ID: <9i9740t3teigg6ghb...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 21:52:11 GMT EXCERPT BELOW:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:27:55 -0800, <c1qj2...@enews1.newsguy.com> "Ken McVay,
OBC" <spam...@nizkor.org> wrote:
>The following was accepted as factual by a Pennsylvania Court:
ONLY because I was not given my legal right of due process to get a copy of the
complaints to refute in the first place!
> REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION
>
> NOW COMES Plaintiff Yale F. Edeiken and demands that, pursuant to Rule
>4014, Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant Scott Bradbury
>admit or deny the truth of the following within thirty (30) days of service
>or, by failing to do so, admit the truth of the matters asserted:
For Yale F. Edeiken to have legally (and properly) served his complaints on me
he would have had to have sent them to the Sheriff's Department in my local
jurisdiction and then a Deputy would have sought me out and presented such
complaints in person and he would have required my signature! THAT IS FACT!
Docket printout to 1999-C-2786
"July 14, 2000 PLTF'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE A SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE
DOCUMENTS AND THINGS FOR DISCOVERY UPON DAYLIN LEACH. AFDT OF SERVICE
ATTACHED." <<Which proves I had an attorney before July 20, 2000.>>
"July 20, 2000 COMPLAINT, NOTICE TO DEFEND. DAMAGES PRAYED FOR IN COUNTS I
THRU V. IN AMT IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMIT FOR ARBITRATION TOGETHER WITH
PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF STATUTORY LIMITS WITH INTEREST. COSTS & ATTY'S
FEES. AFDT OF SERVICE. EXHIBITS ATTACHED."
"August 25, 2000: PRAE TO ENTER JDGT AFGAINST DFT SCOTT BRADBURY AKA DOC
TAVISH FOR FAILURE TO RESPOND. JDGT ENTERED VS/SAID DFT IN AN AMT TO BE
ASSESSEED. IMPORTANT NOTICE, AFDT OF SERVICE EXHIBIT ATTACHED. NOTICE MLD
8/25/2000 FILED @ 9:28 AM."
I was given 30 days to refute the false accusations BUT Yale did not serve the
complaints on me by a Sheriff's Deputy nor on my attorney who is on record with
the court as stating:
Filed September 22, 2000
PETTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
COMES NOW, the defendant, Scott Bradbury, by and through his counsel Daylin B.
Leach, Esquire, to petition this honorable court for Relief from Judgment,
pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. 237.3. In support of this petition, the defendant avers
the following:
On August 25, 2000, the Plaintiff filed a Praecipe for Default Judgment with
this court. A true and correct copy of which is hereto and marked as "Exhibit
A."
Since a complaint has never been filed or served, the defendant is unable to
attach a copy of preliminary objections he would file if the judgment was opened
pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 237.3 (a).
"[The] plaintiff engage[d] in a vendetta against the defendant... When attorney
Leach asked Mr. Edeiken for a copy of the complaint when he first becomes
involved in the case, he is told "Fuck You" via e-mail. In plain English, this
is not a lawsuit, it is a bizarre war waged by Mr. Edeiken on a man he has never
met. The court should not be a party to this."
Respectfully submitted
Daylin B. Leach Esquire
<end>
Now for two people who have admitted to having mental defects!
~~Sara Salzman on record as admitting she's retarded?~~
On 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT, Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
"How many times do I have to tell you-- I AM RETARDED!!!"
<catamont-548CA8...@spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net>
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=catamont-548CA8.19314906072003%40spectator.sj.sys.us.xo.net&output=gplain
Date: 07 Jul 2003 01:31:53 GMT
(Archived locally as: RetardSara)
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below-- Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices. Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact!
(Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=SH9g7.634%247d....@newshog.newsread.com&lr=&hl=en
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT
Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...
[...]
> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you
Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.
~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~
---Famous Last Words Series-- Yale F. Edeiken & Sara D. Salzman:
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=3870...@news3.enter.net&lr=&hl=en
Archived locally as: YaleSuedTwice
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: KOOK WEBSITE
Date: 2000/01/02
Message-ID: <3870...@news3.enter.net>
"I have never been charged with any unethical activity relating to the
practice of law..."
----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=catamont-564BD5.09581216092003%40netnews.attbi.com&rnum=2
(Archived locally as: SaraLibels2)
From: Sara Salzman <cata...@concentric.net>
Subject: Re: PSYCHOSARA SALZMAN'S HOLIDAY SURPRISE ----
Message-ID: <catamont-564BD5...@netnews.attbi.com>
"Yale Edeiken has nothing to do with whether you're an impotent slug,
Mr. Bradbury... PROVE your idiotic assertion that he has been "censured"
by the state supreme court... Sara"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Here is laughing at you big time Yale F. Edeiken and Sara Salzman!
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attdiscdcd.php?id=40290
(Link active October 29, 2003. Archived locally as: shyster_censured)
Attorney ID - 40290
Edeiken, Yale F.
^^^^^^^ ^^^^ ^
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Attorney Inquiry
Attorney ID Case County District
40290 122 DB 95 Lehigh II Public Censure Administered 10/20/98
^^^^^^^^^
<STOP>
A PDF file is available which gives a report on the above
122 DB 95 against Shyster Yale Fatso Edeiken:
http://padisciplinaryboard.org/attopinion.php?case=122DB95
^^^^^^^
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/disciplinaryboard/dboardopinions/122DB95.RPT.pdf
(Link active October 28, 2003. Archived locally as: "Edeiken_Gets_His" and
122DB95.RPT)
As for Yale F.Edeiken's lying statement: "I have never been charged with any
unethical activity relating to the practice of law..."; he was not only charged
three times but he received from the Disciplinary Board of the Pennsylvania
Supreme Court the following:
1) "Private Reprimand" in 1993
2) "Informal Admonition" in 1995
3) "PUBLIC CENSURE" in 1998
(RE: PUBLIFC CENSURE in 1998: The Disciplinary Board was content to give Yale F.
Edeiken a "private reprimand" but he continued to act like the psychotic nut
case he is and defied them and refused to appear at his hearing more than once!
He was then "forced" to appear and the "private reprimand" had escalated to
"PUBLIC CENSURE" by the highest court of Pennsylvania State! Furthermore the
Disciplinary Board closed with: "It is further ORDERED that respondent [Yale F.
Edeiken] shall pay costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g),
PaR.D.E." IOW Yale had to pay the Disciplinary Board to "discipline him" AFTER
the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania had to
serve numerous notices upon him and compel him to attend his disciplinary
hearing!! Yale also had to pay for all costs of the investigation too! It's all
detailed in that PDF file!!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yale F. Edeiken was also charged AND convicted for assaulting a deputy sheriff
in the courthouse! All fully documented in this archive:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s2hq10drpp50ik59v9litpvrdjr1203099%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Edeikook Follies #6 Yale F. Edeiken Goes on a Rampage at His County
Courthouse Message-ID: <s2hq10drpp50ik59v...@4ax.com>
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman Won't Comment on These Forgeries - I Wonder Why!.. V2.0
Message-ID: <0neq10177ekocu899...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Feb 2004 18:21:27 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=images&ie=ISO-8859-1&as_umsgid=1c0540h6tt5gd530n...@4ax.com&lr=&hl=en
Subject: Sara Salzman's S&M Bondage-Torture Fantasies Result in Perjury!
Message-ID: <1c0540h6tt5gd530n...@4ax.com>
Date: 1 Mar 2004 01:35:09 GMT
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=&selm=s70dcvgs3eucqd31n81gqo5e21uj7vvg67%404ax.com&rnum=1
Subject: Sara "The Fist" Salzman - A Compilation of Her Better Known Literary
Works and Opinions
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 13:35:49 -0500
Message-ID: <s70dcvgs3eucqd31n...@4ax.com>
Tavish
~~New Links for Sara Salzman Pictures~~
Sara apparently had the links changed because of many of us having pleasure in
seeing the BEING who plagues us.
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/2/image.gif
http://www.westword.com/issues/11209/4/image.gif
Clicking the two OLD links above will get these returns:
error rendering photo
<!-- Cached from master -->
error rendering photo
<!-- Cached from slave2 -->
Here are the two new working links so everyone may update their files:
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_2.gif
Caption: "Sara Salzman has seen the ugly side of the Internet."
(The above is the picture of Sara sitting at her desk)
http://www.westword.com/issues/2000-08-10/news/feature3_4.gif
Caption: "Sara Salzman grew up listening to her family's stories about the
Holocaust." (The above is the standing picture which is the most famous.)
"Please let me know what drugs you're taking. They sound wonderful!" - Sara
Salzman Message-ID: <schwartz-180...@cmh-p028.infinet.com>
(Archived locally as: SaraSplainsAll_3 and SaraSplainsAll_4)
Sara Salzman
Doc Tavish <Doc_T...@Tavish-Central01.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:34:56 -0600,
> <catamont-D5E08D...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:
>
> >> >since Mr. Bradbury is obviously mentally ill.
> >>
> >> That could be taken as actionable libel.
> >
> >Not at all. It's on file and ACCEPTED AS FACT in a PA court, Moron.
> >You're lying again.
>
> IT WAS ACCEPTED AS FACT BECAUSE EDEIKEN DID NOT ALLOW ME TO CONTEST HIS EVIL
> ACCUSATIONS!! DON'T YOU BELIEVE IN DUE PROCESS SARA? OF COURSE NOT!
>
I believe in due process. I just don't believe in people who take mail
unopened, write "return to Stalker" on it, send it back, and then bitch
about not getting them.
Your case was thrown out on JURISDICTION. It had NOTHING to do with your
due process.