(You can vote again.) Pass on to others.
Here's a poll you might want to get in on regarding whether you think
Scn is being treated fairly or not.
___________________________
As you would know by now, Senator Xenophon has used parliamentary
privilege (of being unaccountable for his actions) to support claims,
made by 7 disaffected ex-Scientologists, of criminal conduct by the
church. He condemned the whole church as a criminal organisation! As
you know, the church’s aim is:
Here is a link for you to vote in defence of the church and for our
rights. Please spare a few moments to click on it and go to “poll”
listed under the news items and vote “yes’. We need more votes. Ask
any of your friends who respect you to do the same. Anyone who knows
any truth about the gifts LRH has given to mankind would be happy to
support you.
> Urgently need more "Yes" votes on this poll/survey. ..
Thanks for finding us. Stick around. Lurk a little.
This is the Good News forum!
> (You can vote again.) ...
hmmmm - but what does a poll prove, if every one can click as many times as
his time allows?
> Here's a poll you might want to get in on regarding whether you think
> Scn is being treated fairly or not.
> ___________________________
>
> http://au.news.yahoo.com/polls/popup/-/poll_id/%2050033
I'm sure everyone here will click the "right" answer.
;-)
Is it being UNFAIRLY judged.
The answer should be "NO!"
D
When I voted yesterday, it was 80% NO and 20% yes. Now it is exactly
the opposite?
I wonder how that is possible......NOT!
I can see the culties franticly voting to support their scamcult.
Again, I might add.
Peter
"Remember one thing, we are not running a business, we are
running a government.
We are in direct control of people's lives.
But for the first time we are not making victims of them,
we are making them more able.
So bring order into these
people's lives."
- HCO Secretary WW2
© 1975 L. Ron Hubbard Library
that wasn't a troll - that was a churchie, first time here.
now you spoiled the game : ( - duh!
no offense! ;-)
I am not a churchie. Not my first time here. Check out my post
history. I don't post often, but I am not a churchie. I left Scn in
mid 2005 officially, 'bout mid 1997 silently.
well ... then Dennis is right
That's right.
>>> Very tricky troll. ...
>> "just asking" <j...@ski.ng> wrote:
>> well ... then Dennis is right
> "IslandGirl" <karl...@yahoo.com> schrieb
> That's right.
Happy trolling, TrollGirl!
Little Nicky's acceptance level is one of the acceptance
of criminals. This
stems from a desire to to be like or admired which has
degraded into a need
for attention and money. As a former laywer, he has a
mental
scarcity of law-abiding people to the point where they no
longer exist
for him. This consideration justifies any harm he may do
to
others by considering that they don't exist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
".Never discuss Scientology with the critic. Just discuss his or her
crimes, known and unknown. And act completely confident that those
crimes
exist...." [LRH Quote]
-Protesters confronting cultists and receiving LRon's prescribed
treatment for critics from them,
e.g."'What are your crimes?...You're a child molester...You beat your
wife",etc. might consider having a copy of Ron's above statement
handy, pulling it out at appropriate times, and reading it back to the
babbling cultist, proving effectively that the cultist is behaving
like a brain-dead, non-thinker, who refuses to engage in any real
conversation. Instead he or she simply regurgitates, parrot-like,
LRon's slanderous script he's told them to stick to, with minor
variations. It would make them look quite foolish, while they're
insisting on willful refusal, on the infallible guru's orders, of
engaging in any rational debate or thought whatsoever!
You're too funny.
The text was sent to me by a Scn friend who doesn't know that I'm no
longer in Scn. I simply copied and pasted the text to this newsgroup
and titled the thread "Poll circulating in the Scn community" so one
would know it was a communication from the inside, not to forward the
intention of the inside.
The question asked in the poll is whether you believe Scientology is
being treated unfairly. I answered "no", and therefore, Dennis was
right about the wording for critic purposes - not about calling me a
tricky troll.
For Pete's sake! Part of the reason I don't post in here all that
much is because of all the paranoia and accusations of people being
trolls or OSA.
> Dennis was
>right about the wording for critic purposes - not about calling me a
>tricky troll.
Yah, sorry. I've got it straight now. Thx.
D
> Dennis was
>right about the wording for critic purposes - not about calling me a
>tricky troll.
But you know, IG, I use the world "troll" as a verb or a noun
describing the action of trolling. I wasn't using it to describe an
ugly, stature-impaired person who lives under bridges, but rather the
~wording~ of the note was a tricky troll.
D
-----------------
"I was one of those." - Leonard Cohen
What is the purpose in continuing this? I understand your use of the
word - why do you insist on badgering me? I'm not a trolling troll
(there - a verb and noun both for you.)
When I voted yesterday, it was 80% NO and 20% yes. Now it is exactly
the opposite?
I wonder how that is possible......NOT!
I can see the culties franticly voting to support their scamcult.
Again, I might add.
<<<From MANY MANY mails, the; since the numbers are near 200000 scnists
voting or pro-sca voters, which is FAIRLY impossible!
Peter
"Remember one thing, we are not running a business, we are
running a government.
We are in direct control of people's lives.
But for the first time we are not making victims of them,
we are making them more able.
So bring order into these
people's lives."
- HCO Secretary WW2
�ソス 1975 L. Ron Hubbard Library
http://www.scamofscientology.nl
"IslandGirl" <karl...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e40edab8-1aa5-4ac1...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
Don't pretend to be so justified. You should have stated where the 'text'
came from in the beginning, instead of trolling. Did you crave attention or
something vapid?
>As you would know by now, Senator Xenophon has used parliamentary
>privilege (of being unaccountable for his actions) to support claims,
>made by 7 disaffected ex-Scientologists, of criminal conduct by the
>church. He condemned the whole church as a criminal organisation!
Who would have thought it?! :-)
Nick.