NY Times: deep brain stimulation treats depression
Dave Touretzky
From the Sunday New York Times (subscription required):
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/02/magazine/02depression.html
A Depression Switch?
By DAVID DOBBS
Published: April 2, 2006
Deanna Cole-Benjamin never figured to be a test case for a radical new
brain surgery for depression. Her youth contained no traumas; her
adult life, as she describes it, was blessed. At 22 she joined Gary
Benjamin, a career financial officer in the Canadian Army, in a
marriage that brought her happiness and, in the 1990's, three
children. They lived in a comfortable house in Kingston, a pleasant
university town on Lake Ontario's north shore, and Deanna, a
public-health nurse, loved her work. But in the last months of 2000,
apropos nothing of no life changes, losses no she slid into a
depression of extraordinary depth and duration.... [snip]
The operation borrowed a procedure called deep brain stimulation, or
D.B.S., which is used to treat Parkinson's. It involves planting
electrodes in a region near the center of the brain called Area 25 and
sending in a steady stream of low voltage from a pacemaker in the
chest. One of the study's leaders, Dr. Helen Mayberg, a neurologist,
had detected in depressed patients what she suspected was a crucial
dysfunction in Area 25's activity. She hypothesized that the
electrodes might modulate the area and ease the depression.... [snip]
As it turned out, 8 of the 12 patients he operated on, including
Deanna, felt their depressions lift while suffering minimal effects
side an incredible rate of effectiveness in patients so immovably
depressed. Nor did they just vaguely recover. Their scores on the
Hamilton depression scale, a standard used to measure the severity of
depression, fell from the soul-deadening high 20's to the digits
single essentially normal.... [snip]
-- Dave Touretzky: "Let's ask Tom Cruise for advice on this!"
http://PerkinsTragedy.org
wbarwell
Psychs! Electrodes! BAD!!
Someday, science will get this all figured out and
dealt with. Scientologists will still be stuck in
the 50's looking at few exeptional low spots and
painting the psychs with that one, broad brush.
--
Just when did the children of Cthulhu take
over our government anyway?
Cheerful Charlie
roger gonnet
"wbarwell" <wbar...@mylinuxisp.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
1230sn3...@corp.supernews.com...
well, perhaps they'll again say that their e-meter is of comparable use, since
it sends low voltage through the body, "light-ECTing" people to destress them!!
(Arnie explained that a 2,5 hours session on emeter was flowing more joules
through the body than a session of ECT)...
r
Asmodeus
Excerpt from:
"Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society"
Jose M. R. Delgado, M.D. (Harper & Row, NY, 1969)
Two-way Radio Communication with the Brain (Pgs. 89 - 96)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr Jose Delgado, a neurophsiologist at Yale University School, was
especially interested in Electronic Stimulation of the Brain. By
implanting a small probe into the brain, Delgado discovered that he
could wield enormous power over his subject. Using a device he called
the 'stimoceiver' which operated by FM radio waves, he was able to
electrically orchestrate a wide range of human emotions. These included
rage, lust and fatigue. (Note: Stimoceiver is a S.B.M.C.D. or/
Spherical Biological Monitoring and Control Device. This ultra
submicrominiaturized unit is the offspring of alien technology. Much of
this was continued on the MK-Ultra Sub-Project 95 by Dr.Jose Delgado
and Dr Louis Joylan West who mastered a technology called "RHIC-EDOM."
RHIC means "Radio Hypnotic Intracerebral Control", and EDOM means
"Electronic Dissolution Of Memory." These implants are stimulated to
induce a post-hypnotic suggestion. EDOM is nothing more than "Missing
Time" or/ the erasure of memory from the consciousness. The following
Projects still use advanced RHIC-EDOM technology by CIA Black Ops and
the military............Col.)
[ Under the auspices the fascist regime in Spain during WWII, Jose
Delgado began his research into the use of pain and pleasure for mind
control. Later, as Director of Neuropsychiatry at Yale University
Medical School, he refined the design of his "transdermal
stimulator"...a computer controlled, remote neurologic transceiver and
aversion stimulator. Since the 1970s, Delgado "has shifted his interest
from direct electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) to the broader
area of the biological effects of electromagnetic fields." (Cross
Currents - Dr. Robert Becker) ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This gap is now being filled, and as Figures 4 and 5 show, it is
already possible to equip animals or human beings with minute
instruments called "stimoceivers" for radio transmission and reception
of electrical messages to and from the brain in completely unrestrained
subjects. Microminiaturization of the instrument's electronic
components permits control of all parameters of excitation for radio
stimulation of three different points within the brain and also
telemetric recording of three channels of intracerebral electrical
activity.
It is reasonable to speculate that in the near future the stimoceiver
may provide the essential link from man to computer to man, with a
reciprocal feedback between neurons and instruments which represents a
new orientation for the medical control of neurophysiological
functions. For example, it is conceivable that the localized abnormal
electrical activity which announces the imminence of an epileptic
attack could be picked up by implanted electrodes, telemetered to a
distant instrument room, tape-recorded, and analyzed by a computer
capable of recognizing abnormal electrical patterns. Identification of
the specific electrical disturbance could trigger the emission of radio
signals to activate the patient's stimoceiver and apply an electrical
stimulation to a determined inhibitory area of the brain, thus blocking
the onset of the convulsive episode.
One of the limiting factors in these studies was the existence of wires
leading from the brain to the stimoceiver outside of the scalp. The
wires represented a possible portal of entry for infection and could be
a hindrance to hair grooming in spite of their small size. It would
obviously be far more desirable to employ minute instruments which
could be implanted completely beneath the skin. For this purpose we
have developed in our laboratory a small three-channel stimulator which
can be placed subcutaneously and which has terminal leads to be
implanted within the brain (Figure 6). The instrument is solid state,
has no batteries, and can work indefinitely. Necessary electrical
energy, remote control of parameters of stimulation, and choice of
channels are provided by transdermal coupling, using a small coil which
is activated by frequency-modulated radio signals.
The technology for nonsensory communication between brains and
computers through the intact skin is already at our fingertips, and its
consequences are difficult to predict. In the past the progress of
civilization has tremendously magnified the power of our senses,
muscles, and skills. Now we are adding a new dimension: the direct
interface between brains and machines. Although true, this statement is
perhaps too spectacular and it requires cautious clarification. Our
present knowledge regarding the coding of information, mechanisms of
perception, and neuronal bases of behavior is so elemental that it is
highly improbable that electrical correlates of thoughts or emotions
could be picked up, transmitted, and electrically applied to the
suitable structure of a different subject in order to be recognized and
to trigger related thoughts or emotions. It is, however, already
possible to induce a large variety of responses, from motor effects to
emotional reactions and intellectual manifestations, by direct
electrical stimulation of the brain. Also, several investigators have
learned to identify patterns of electrical activity (which a computer
could also recognize) localized in specific areas of the brain and
related to determined phenomena such as perception of smells or visual
perception of edges and movements. We are advancing rapidly in the
pattern recognition of electrical correlates of behavior and in the
methodology for two-way radio communication between brain and
computers.
Fears have been expressed that this new technology brings with it the
threat of possible unwanted and unethical remote control of the
cerebral activities of man by other men, but as will be discussed
later, this danger is quite improbable and is outweighed by the
expected clinical and scientific benefits. Electronic knowledge and
microminiaturization have progressed so much that the limits appear
biological rather than technological. Our greatest need is for more
experimental information about the neuronal mechanisms related to
behavioral and mental processes, and research in unrestricted subjects
promises to reveal new understanding of normal minds and more efficient
therapy of disturbed brains.
Figure 6
Both sides of a three-channel transdermal stimulator.
This instrument has no batteries, is activated by radio,
and can be used for life, so that the brain can be stimulated
indefinitely.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gee, I think it's a great idea if you want to be a robot.
Quaoar
Flunk! You failed to read the text. Try again, more slowly this time.
Q
Asmodeus
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/8e62fa31554e3c4e?&hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/28cd3f4fa733e3a5?&hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/b71708936202fb01?&hl=en
Actually, I read the article over a year ago when it was published in
CNN.ESB is ESB which as you can see is part of the Mind Control agenda.
Maybe you should reread the article I posted and also listen to
Huxley's lecture The Ultimate Revolution:
John Marks' book The Search of the Manchurian Candidate:
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/LSD/marks.htm
A few declassified documents pertaining to "Non" Lethal, Less than
Lethal or soft kill technology:
http://www.angelfire.com/or/mctrl/nonlethal.html
https://www.jnlwp.com/mission.asp
Unless you choose to remain ignorant of the subject, which obviously
you are.
Rev. Norle Enturbulata
"ultrasubmicrominiturized unit" which is "the offspring of alien
technology." Then it turns into wacko-matic black helicoptersville with a
lot of quasi-scientific and psychological terminology thrown in. Is that
material copyrighted? The last figure describes something very similar to
the "interocitor" from "This Island Earth" (1955). See
http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/interocitor/about.html for an illustration of
a device one can make using the interocitor. In some respects it is Science
Fiction's and practicing science's Holy Grail, because it outputs more power
than it is given.
(The interocitor is not to be confused with the "oscillator overthruster"
from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai", whose form was stolen without even
changing the way it looks for "Back to the Future".) But it is all quite
still Science Fiction, and much better stuff than L. Ron Hubbard ever dreamt
of writing.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/9363363/inside_scientology
http://BuffaloScientologyInfo.com - http://www.xenu.net
http://PerkinsTragedy.org - http://www.xenutv.net
http://www.whyaretheydead.net
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.xenutv.com
http://www.scientology-lies.com
http://www.whyaretheydead.net
http://www.scientology-kills.org
Rev. Norle Enturbulata
"Church" of Cartoonism
*
* " You can write that down in your book in great big letters. The only way
you can control anybody is to lie to them."
* -- L. Ron Hubbard, "Technique 88"
*
* "...Never discuss Scientology with the critic. Just discuss his or her
crimes, known and unknown. And act completely confident that those crimes
exist...."
* L. Ron Hubbard, "Critics of Scientology", November 5, 1967
*
* "All men shall be my slaves! All women shall succumb to my charms! All
mankind shall grovel at my feet and not know why!"
- L. Ron Hubbard, "Personal Affirmations"
"Quaoar" <qua...@tenthplanet.net> wrote in message
news:HdCdnReWeqbf-azZ...@comcast.com...
> Asmodeus wrote:
>> Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado
>>
>> Excerpt from:
>> "Physical Control of the Mind, Toward a Psychocivilized Society"
>> Jose M. R. Delgado, M.D. (Harper & Row, NY, 1969)
>> Two-way Radio Communication with the Brain (Pgs. 89 - 96)
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Dr Jose Delgado, a neurophsiologist at Yale University School, was
>> especially interested in Electronic Stimulation of the Brain. By
>> implanting a small probe into the brain, Delgado discovered that he
>> could wield enormous power over his subject. Using a device he called
>> the 'stimoceiver' which operated by FM radio waves, he was able to
>> electrically orchestrate a wide range of human emotions. These included
>> rage, lust and fatigue. (Note: Stimoceiver is a S.B.M.C.D. or/
>> Spherical Biological Monitoring and Control Device. This ultra
>> submicrominiaturized unit is the offspring of alien technology.
<snip>
Asmodeus
> Pretty interesting all the way up to the cheesy "Stimoceiver", an
> "ultrasubmicrominiturized unit" which is "the offspring of alien
> technology."
Obviously, you're tin foil cap must have fallen over your eyes.
Either that or you should cut back on the micro grams as your
hallucinations are verging on delusional.
There is no mention in any article I've cited of "alien technology".
Then it turns into wacko-matic black helicoptersville with a
> lot of quasi-scientific and psychological terminology thrown in. Is that
> material copyrighted? The last figure describes something very similar to
> the "interocitor" from "This Island Earth" (1955). See
> http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/interocitor/about.html for an illustration of
> a device one can make using the interocitor. In some respects it is Science
> Fiction's and practicing science's Holy Grail, because it outputs more power
> than it is given.
Uh huh.
Its amazing that you can actually use a computer.
>
> (The interocitor is not to be confused with the "oscillator overthruster"
> from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai", whose form was stolen without even
> changing the way it looks for "Back to the Future".) But it is all quite
> still Science Fiction, and much better stuff than L. Ron Hubbard ever dreamt
> of writing.
Do you get out of your cave occasionally?
Rev. Norle Enturbulata
"Asmodeus" <sca...@spiesonline.zzn.com> wrote in message
news:1144113183....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Rev. Norle Enturbulata wrote:
>> Pretty interesting all the way up to the cheesy "Stimoceiver", an
>> "ultrasubmicrominiturized unit" which is "the offspring of alien
>> technology."
>
> Obviously, you're tin foil cap must have fallen over your eyes.
>
> Either that or you should cut back on the micro grams as your
> hallucinations are verging on delusional.
>
> There is no mention in any article I've cited of "alien technology".
Try your earlier post? ADHD? See the bottom of the post, with your article
in it.
There. Remember?
> Then it turns into wacko-matic black helicoptersville with a
>> lot of quasi-scientific and psychological terminology thrown in. Is that
>> material copyrighted? The last figure describes something very similar
>> to
>> the "interocitor" from "This Island Earth" (1955). See
>> http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/interocitor/about.html for an illustration
>> of
>> a device one can make using the interocitor. In some respects it is
>> Science
>> Fiction's and practicing science's Holy Grail, because it outputs more
>> power
>> than it is given.
>
> Uh huh.
>
> Its amazing that you can actually use a computer.
That's not an addressing of anything I said. Scientology "communications
skills" are like that: Attack the messenger, not the message. Why did you
snip the bits you couldn't deal with then? Go back to a real school next
time.
>> (The interocitor is not to be confused with the "oscillator overthruster"
>> from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai", whose form was stolen without
>> even
>> changing the way it looks for "Back to the Future".) But it is all quite
>> still Science Fiction, and much better stuff than L. Ron Hubbard ever
>> dreamt
>> of writing.
>
> Do you get out of your cave occasionally?
Again, another non-confront, pal. Have you ever known anyone else who
couldn't communicate with others?
Asmodeus
> "Asmodeus" <sca...@spiesonline.zzn.com> wrote in message
> news:1144113183....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Rev. Norle Enturbulata wrote:
> >> Pretty interesting all the way up to the cheesy "Stimoceiver", an
> >> "ultrasubmicrominiturized unit" which is "the offspring of alien
> >> technology."
> >
> > Obviously, you're tin foil cap must have fallen over your eyes.
> >
> > Either that or you should cut back on the micro grams as your
> > hallucinations are verging on delusional.
> >
> > There is no mention in any article I've cited of "alien technology".
>
> Try your earlier post? ADHD? See the bottom of the post, with your article
> in it.
I was dealing with the actual except from here:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061319147/002-6079638-0648827?v=glance&n=283155
Not the Cliff Note's speculations in the margin.
Though you seem to be hung up on this point and not the actual article
itself.
>
> There. Remember?
Remember what?
That you lack discernment.
>
> > Then it turns into wacko-matic black helicoptersville with a
> >> lot of quasi-scientific and psychological terminology thrown in. Is that
> >> material copyrighted? The last figure describes something very similar
> >> to
> >> the "interocitor" from "This Island Earth" (1955). See
> >> http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/interocitor/about.html for an illustration
> >> of
> >> a device one can make using the interocitor. In some respects it is
> >> Science
> >> Fiction's and practicing science's Holy Grail, because it outputs more
> >> power
> >> than it is given.
> >
> > Uh huh.
> >
> > Its amazing that you can actually use a computer.
>
> That's not an addressing of anything I said.
A mutual error, because I did cite references that were quite reliable
yet you seem obsessed on one minor point which wasn't even part of the
main text an actual excerpt about a technology that does in fact exist.
Whether it is of alien origin is purely speculative on the poster's
part and is not part of the discussion.
>Scientology "communications
> skills" are like that: Attack the messenger, not the message.
Seems to me that it is you who are using similar tactics as well
creating a straw man by evading the actual issue and ignoring the other
citations.
>Why did you
> snip the bits you couldn't deal with then?
I've already answered that.
>Go back to a real school next
> time.
Why?
So I can become a brain dead moron like most of those "graduating" from
state run schools, who are functionally illiterate.
>
> >> (The interocitor is not to be confused with the "oscillator overthruster"
> >> from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai", whose form was stolen without
> >> even
> >> changing the way it looks for "Back to the Future".) But it is all quite
> >> still Science Fiction, and much better stuff than L. Ron Hubbard ever
> >> dreamt
> >> of writing.
> >
> > Do you get out of your cave occasionally?
>
> Again, another non-confront, pal. Have you ever known anyone else who
> couldn't communicate with others?
That is such an absurd question.
Is this your idiotic effort to "process" me by using the "tech" you so
much despise ?
Rev. Norle Enturbulata
> Rev. Norle Enturbulata wrote:
>> "Asmodeus" <sca...@spiesonline.zzn.com> wrote in message
>> news:1144113183....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > Rev. Norle Enturbulata wrote:
>> >> Pretty interesting all the way up to the cheesy "Stimoceiver", an
>> >> "ultrasubmicrominiturized unit" which is "the offspring of alien
>> >> technology."
>> >
>> > Obviously, you're tin foil cap must have fallen over your eyes.
>> >
>> > Either that or you should cut back on the micro grams as your
>> > hallucinations are verging on delusional.
>> >
>> > There is no mention in any article I've cited of "alien technology".
>>
>> Try your earlier post? ADHD? See the bottom of the post, with your
>> article
>> in it.
>
> I was dealing with the actual except from here:
>
> http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061319147/002-6079638-0648827?v=glance&n=283155
>
> Not the Cliff Note's speculations in the margin.
>
> Though you seem to be hung up on this point and not the actual article
> itself.
Claiming something is of "alien origin" is a pretty big point, bub. It
pretty much scuppers the entire thing on the reliability scale.
>>
>> There. Remember?
>
> Remember what?
>
> That you lack discernment.
Non-confront, FLUNK!
Why do you keep wanting to cross-post this?
>>
>> > Then it turns into wacko-matic black helicoptersville with a
>> >> lot of quasi-scientific and psychological terminology thrown in. Is
>> >> that
>> >> material copyrighted? The last figure describes something very
>> >> similar
>> >> to
>> >> the "interocitor" from "This Island Earth" (1955). See
>> >> http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/interocitor/about.html for an
>> >> illustration
>> >> of
>> >> a device one can make using the interocitor. In some respects it is
>> >> Science
>> >> Fiction's and practicing science's Holy Grail, because it outputs more
>> >> power
>> >> than it is given.
>> >
>> > Uh huh.
>> >
>> > Its amazing that you can actually use a computer.
>>
>> That's not an addressing of anything I said.
>
> A mutual error, because I did cite references that were quite reliable
About alien technology, riiiight.
> yet you seem obsessed on one minor point which wasn't even part of the
> main text an actual excerpt about a technology that does in fact exist.
> Whether it is of alien origin is purely speculative on the poster's
> part and is not part of the discussion.
It's part of the text, which you now try to distance yourself from. It's a
red flag for kookery, and you know it.
>
>>Scientology "communications
>> skills" are like that: Attack the messenger, not the message.
>
> Seems to me that it is you who are using similar tactics as well
> creating a straw man by evading the actual issue and ignoring the other
> citations.
>
>>Why did you
>> snip the bits you couldn't deal with then?
>
> I've already answered that.
>
>>Go back to a real school next
>> time.
>
> Why?
>
> So I can become a brain dead moron like most of those "graduating" from
> state run schools, who are functionally illiterate.
As opposed to a Delphi school, huh? Hmm. Get a grip on your use of
punctuation, fella. The spittle is showing.
>> >> (The interocitor is not to be confused with the "oscillator
>> >> overthruster"
>> >> from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai", whose form was stolen
>> >> without
>> >> even
>> >> changing the way it looks for "Back to the Future".) But it is all
>> >> quite
>> >> still Science Fiction, and much better stuff than L. Ron Hubbard ever
>> >> dreamt
>> >> of writing.
>> >
>> > Do you get out of your cave occasionally?
>>
>> Again, another non-confront, pal. Have you ever known anyone else who
>> couldn't communicate with others?
>
> That is such an absurd question.
And just the kind of thing you should be used to in applying the "tech".
> Is this your idiotic effort to "process" me by using the "tech" you so
> much despise ?
The "tech" is rubbish, and worthy of ridicule. You don't seem to be able to
"process" or "cog" that.
Asmodeus
> "Asmodeus" <sca...@spiesonline.zzn.com> wrote in message
> news:1144117952....@e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > Rev. Norle Enturbulata wrote:
> >> "Asmodeus" <sca...@spiesonline.zzn.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1144113183....@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >> > Rev. Norle Enturbulata wrote:
> >> >> Pretty interesting all the way up to the cheesy "Stimoceiver", an
> >> >> "ultrasubmicrominiturized unit" which is "the offspring of alien
> >> >> technology."
> >> >
> >> > Obviously, you're tin foil cap must have fallen over your eyes.
> >> >
> >> > Either that or you should cut back on the micro grams as your
> >> > hallucinations are verging on delusional.
> >> >
> >> > There is no mention in any article I've cited of "alien technology".
> >>
> >> Try your earlier post? ADHD? See the bottom of the post, with your
> >> article
> >> in it.
> >
> > I was dealing with the actual except from here:
> >
> > http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061319147/002-6079638-0648827?v=glance&n=283155
> >
> > Not the Cliff Note's speculations in the margin.
> >
> > Though you seem to be hung up on this point and not the actual article
> > itself.
>
> Claiming something is of "alien origin" is a pretty big point, bub. It
> pretty much scuppers the entire thing on the reliability scale.
As I said the person who posted the excerpt made the claim
However, the exerpt is an actual quote from Delgado on the subject of
psychotronics.
Something you are obviously unable to distinguish.
Here is the full article:
http://www.wireheading.com/delgado/index.html
Now do you see anything about "alien technology" or "black
helicopters"?
>
> >>
> >> There. Remember?
> >
> > Remember what?
> >
> > That you lack discernment.
>
> Non-confront, FLUNK!
>
> Why do you keep wanting to cross-post this?
Why not?
The crossposts were to relevant NGs.
You got a problem with the First Amendment?
>
> >>
> >> > Then it turns into wacko-matic black helicoptersville with a
> >> >> lot of quasi-scientific and psychological terminology thrown in. Is
> >> >> that
> >> >> material copyrighted? The last figure describes something very
> >> >> similar
> >> >> to
> >> >> the "interocitor" from "This Island Earth" (1955). See
> >> >> http://www.shipbrook.com/jeff/interocitor/about.html for an
> >> >> illustration
> >> >> of
> >> >> a device one can make using the interocitor. In some respects it is
> >> >> Science
> >> >> Fiction's and practicing science's Holy Grail, because it outputs more
> >> >> power
> >> >> than it is given.
> >> >
> >> > Uh huh.
> >> >
> >> > Its amazing that you can actually use a computer.
> >>
> >> That's not an addressing of anything I said.
> >
> > A mutual error, because I did cite references that were quite reliable
>
> About alien technology, riiiight.
No.
About ESB which is what this post is about.
You're the one making the case about alien technology.
I am not.
>
> > yet you seem obsessed on one minor point which wasn't even part of the
> > main text an actual excerpt about a technology that does in fact exist.
> > Whether it is of alien origin is purely speculative on the poster's
> > part and is not part of the discussion.
>
> It's part of the text, which you now try to distance yourself from. It's a
> red flag for kookery, and you know it.
>
> >
> >>Scientology "communications
> >> skills" are like that: Attack the messenger, not the message.
> >
> > Seems to me that it is you who are using similar tactics as well
> > creating a straw man by evading the actual issue and ignoring the other
> > citations.
> >
> >>Why did you
> >> snip the bits you couldn't deal with then?
> >
> > I've already answered that.
> >
> >>Go back to a real school next
> >> time.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > So I can become a brain dead moron like most of those "graduating" from
> > state run schools, who are functionally illiterate.
>
> As opposed to a Delphi school, huh?
Never went to Delphi school.
>Hmm. Get a grip on your use of
> punctuation, fella. The spittle is showing.
While you're drolling on the key board?
>
> >> >> (The interocitor is not to be confused with the "oscillator
> >> >> overthruster"
> >> >> from "The Adventures of Buckaroo Banzai", whose form was stolen
> >> >> without
> >> >> even
> >> >> changing the way it looks for "Back to the Future".) But it is all
> >> >> quite
> >> >> still Science Fiction, and much better stuff than L. Ron Hubbard ever
> >> >> dreamt
> >> >> of writing.
> >> >
> >> > Do you get out of your cave occasionally?
> >>
> >> Again, another non-confront, pal. Have you ever known anyone else who
> >> couldn't communicate with others?
> >
> > That is such an absurd question.
>
> And just the kind of thing you should be used to in applying the "tech".
I see, so asking absurd questions is "applying the tech".
So you must be "applying the tech" with your absurd responses that are
intellectually dishonest and disingenuous which are based solely on
some straw man, as well.
>
> > Is this your idiotic effort to "process" me by using the "tech" you so
> > much despise ?
>
> The "tech" is rubbish, and worthy of ridicule.
So you enjoy playing with "rubbish" and being ridiculed?
>You don't seem to be able to
> "process" or "cog" that.
Nor do you seem to have a grasp of the English language.
I'll stick with my bad punctuation.
>This explains why you "apply" it at every opportunity.
I see so any one who disagrees with your ravings is "applying the
tech".