The Truth About Silvia Kusada

[Mister Fabian]

This is a very informative Blog about Silvia Kusada.

http://truthaboutskusada.wordpress.com/

[Mister Fabian]

[Hartley Patterson]

tobef...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> This is a very informative Blog about Silvia Kusada.
>
> http://truthaboutskusada.wordpress.com/

Hi OSA!

Yes this is OSA - Silvia's personal stalker (doncha love 'em?) also wrote
to 'Freezone Survivors', an OSA Dead Agent website, 'recommending' his
Blog. He also claims to be 'old guard' and a 'critic', as if anyone but
OSA would do that. Heh.

--
FREEDOM is a trademark owned by
Religious Technology Center
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm

[Hartley Patterson]

hpt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
>
> tobef...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > This is a very informative Blog about Silvia Kusada.
> >
> > http://truthaboutskusada.wordpress.com/
>
> Hi OSA!
>
> Yes this is OSA - Silvia's personal stalker (doncha love 'em?) also wrote
> to 'Freezone Survivors', an OSA Dead Agent website, 'recommending' his
> Blog. He also claims to be 'old guard' and a 'critic', as if anyone but
> OSA would do that. Heh.

Word in the blogs is that this is our old friend Truthseeker! If so,
welcome back slimeball.

--
Patterson's Law: all public Internet discussions
about Scientology will include a post claiming that
all religions are equally bad
http://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm

[diana...@yahoo.com]

He IS trueseeker, aka Mrfabian, etc,etc,etc

Here is my response to his blog; here is the real truth about Silvia
Kusada:

http://aidathomas.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/the-truth-about-silvia-kusada/

On Mar 22, 8:22 am, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:
> hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk wrote:

[Peter Schilte]

On 25 mrt, 09:43, dianacla...@yahoo.com wrote:
> He IS trueseeker, aka Mrfabian, etc,etc,etc
>
> Here is my response to his blog; here is the real truth about Silvia
> Kusada:
>

> http://aidathomas.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/the-truth-about-silvia-kus...

>
> On Mar 22, 8:22 am, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
>
> > > tobefab...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > This is a very informative Blog about Silvia Kusada.
>
> > > >http://truthaboutskusada.wordpress.com/
>
> > > Hi OSA!
>
> > > Yes this is OSA -  Silvia's personal stalker (doncha love 'em?) also wrote
> > > to 'Freezone Survivors', an OSA Dead Agent website, 'recommending' his
> > > Blog. He also claims to be 'old guard' and a 'critic', as if anyone but
> > > OSA would do that. Heh.
>
> > Word in the blogs is that this is our old friend Truthseeker! If so,
> > welcome back slimeball.
>
> > --
> > Patterson's Law: all public Internet discussions
> > about Scientology will include a post claiming that
> > all religions are equally badhttp://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm

Quote:

Neil R. Woods, Senerna, MD

Profession:
Dentist;

Lic. No. 029608;

Cal. No. 21396

Regents Action Date:
May 18, 2004

Action:
Application for consent order granted; Penalty agreed upon: 1 year
suspension, execution of suspension stayed, probation 1 year, $1,000
fine.
Summary: Licensee did not contest the charge of being found guilty by
the Maryland State Board of Dental Examiners of professional
misconduct (submitting a claim for work not completed, overcharging a
patient, performing work not authorized, and over-billing insurers).

End of quote.

So this idiot Truthseeker is in fact a conman. Then The Impossible to
handle .Lily FireRed is his wife, Barbara (Bobbi) Ann Woods.

[Hartley Patterson]

peters...@gmail.com wrote:

>
> So this idiot Truthseeker is in fact a conman. Then The Impossible to
> handle .Lily FireRed is his wife, Barbara (Bobbi) Ann Woods.

IIRC Lily appeared to be posting from Austria.

[Peter Schilte]

On 26 mrt, 11:30, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
wrote:

Your memory works better than my memory: You are right.
O well, no harm done. :-)

Sir Peter

[Andrew Robertson]

On 26/03/2012 10:30 p.m., Hartley Patterson wrote:
> peters...@gmail.com wrote:

>> So this idiot Truthseeker is in fact a conman. Then The Impossible to
>> handle .Lily FireRed is his wife, Barbara (Bobbi) Ann Woods.

> IIRC Lily appeared to be posting from Austria.

That's quite correct Hartley, 195.3.113.255 originates from Vienna, via
Telekom Austria.

When .Lily occasionally went 'off message' and wrote from the heart
about what really mattered to her, which was not an amends program to
get back into favour with the Vienna Org's DSA, she showed a
considerable knowledge of domestic Austrian politics and also a fondness
for Schokolade Weihnachtsbäckerei that would be unusual for someone
living in Salisbury, Maryland.

Of course senior people in RTC and OSA when the operation was at its
height would have full knowledge about the earlier 'Dorian' scripts and
the later 'Truth Seeker' addendum and no doubt will tell that story at
the appropriate time when they perceive a reason for the truth to emerge.

But I must say there's a certain disingenuousness about that episode
being displayed at present by those who know the real facts!


Andrew

[Kat]

On Thursday, March 22, 2012 11:22:04 AM UTC-4, Hartley Patterson wrote:

>
> Word in the blogs is that this is our old friend Truthseeker! If so,
> welcome back slimeball.

You mean the good ol OT from Maryland that DC anonymous members tracked and outed? Or do they have some new sap working that gig after the last one's abysmal failure.

[Truth Seeker]

On Mar 19, 9:36 pm, Mister Fabian <tobefab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a very informative Blog about SilviaKusada.
>
> http://truthaboutskusada.wordpress.com/

Here's the new link with her Silvia's full name in the address:

http://truthsilviakusada.wordpress.com/


Tim H.

http://atcause.wordpress.com/

[Truth Seeker]

Hey, if you want to keep thinking I'm some guy named "Neil Woods" go
right on ahead. :-)


Tim H.

http://atcause.wordpress.com/
http://truthsilviakusada.wordpress.com/

[Truth Seeker]

On Mar 25, 3:43 am, dianacla...@yahoo.com wrote:
> He IS trueseeker, aka Mrfabian, etc,etc,etc
>
> Here is my response to his blog; here is the real truth about Silvia
> Kusada:
>

> http://aidathomas.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/the-truth-about-silvia-kus...

>
> On Mar 22, 8:22 am, Hartley Patterson <hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > hptt...@daisy.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
>
> > > tobefab...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > This is a very informative Blog about Silvia Kusada.
>
> > > >http://truthaboutskusada.wordpress.com/
>
> > > Hi OSA!
>
> > > Yes this is OSA -  Silvia's personal stalker (doncha love 'em?) also wrote
> > > to 'Freezone Survivors', an OSA Dead Agent website, 'recommending' his
> > > Blog. He also claims to be 'old guard' and a 'critic', as if anyone but
> > > OSA would do that. Heh.
>
> > Word in the blogs is that this is our old friend Truthseeker! If so,
> > welcome back slimeball.
>
> > --
> > Patterson's Law: all public Internet discussions
> > about Scientology will include a post claiming that
> > all religions are equally badhttp://www.newsfrombree.co.uk/stolgy_0.htm

You blog post is full of false data.

By the way Aida, who's "Diana"?

One of your aliases?

[Kat]

On Sunday, April 22, 2012 6:41:44 PM UTC-4, Truth Seeker wrote:

> Hey, if you want to keep thinking I'm some guy named "Neil Woods" go
> right on ahead. :-)
>
>
> Tim H.
>

Sunshine, you fucked up when you went after Sparrow.

We have dox.

Crawl back under your rock now, snake, before DC anon exposes you for what you are once again.

[Timothy Higgs]

"Sparrow"?

Do you mean Brian Mandigo?

The same guy that couldn't keep a job as a janitor?

The same guy with the drinking problem?

Brian is doing a great job in fucking up his own life all by himself.

While your at it, ask Brian how much money Moxon paid him to stop
protesting on the east coast.

At least I have the courage to post under my own name.

What your name "Kat"?

I know, too gutless and chicken shit to say.

[Kat]

On Friday, May 18, 2012 1:27:09 AM UTC-4, Timothy Higgs wrote:

You aren't very smart, are you? A smart man would have walked away.

>
> "Sparrow"?
>
> Do you mean Brian Mandigo?

Yes. The man you called repeatedly and harassed on your cell phone while posing as a "critic" of scientology.

>
> The same guy that couldn't keep a job as a janitor?

HAH! Thank you for showing your eagerness to attack someone on a personal level to invalidate them. The job he did years ago when he was young is no indication of his intellect, personality or work ethic.

Yes, if he were a "REAL" man like you, he would spend years posting to usenet, personally attacking anyone who disagreed with him. He would commit illegal acts like what you did to Tori. He would harass people by phone and attack any other critic of scientology as OSA so that he could fuck with people's heads. Oh wait! Those are all things a little bitch would do, not a man.

>
> The same guy with the drinking problem?

Really? MORE personal attacks and black PR? You DO realize that you are only validating my point, right?

I spent several years around him and never witnessed him take a sip, even when the rest of the DC anons were partying at dinner.

>
> Brian is doing a great job in fucking up his own life all by himself.

He got out of scientology and has encouraged a lot of other people to do so. I'd say he's done "fucking up his life" (as if anything that comes out of YOUR mouth has any ounce of credibility) and has made some drastic improvements... like getting away from the cult you have worked for so tirelessly for all these years.

>
> While your at it, ask Brian how much money Moxon paid him to stop
> protesting on the east coast.

Like I care! If they paid him off, good for him. He gave a lot of time and energy to scientology, if they gave him a pay out to disappear I consider that karma for the hell they put him through.

>
> At least I have the courage to post under my own name.

As opposed to the years you posted under "truth seeker"? HAHA Give me a break!

>
> What your name "Kat"?

What a shocker :) OSA asking for an anonymous critics name. Yes, let me give a member of a litigious cult my full name so his buddies can harass me for exercising free speech. HAH!

>
> I know, too gutless and chicken shit to say.

Nope. I just don't want you and the rest of OSA calling me up and harassing me like you did Sparrow.

Our founding fathers understood the importance of anonymous protest. In fact, it's one of our fundamental rights as US citizens. It doesn't make anyone chicken shit.

Thank you, Truthsucker, for showing your willingness to fall back on personal attack and blatant lies to try and invalidate critics.

Your OSA stripes are showing.

[Timothy Higgs]

> > "Sparrow"?
>
> > Do you mean Brian Mandigo?
>
> Yes. The man you called repeatedly and harassed on your cell phone while posing as a "critic" of scientology.

First off, I called him because he gave his phone number with the
purpose that I did call him. We were getting along just fine until OSA
3rd partied my by passing lies to DC Anonymous and then he pulled back
from me.

I only spoke to him once or twice and I was not "posing" as a critic,
I am a critic.

> > The same guy that couldn't keep a job as a janitor?
>
> HAH! Thank you for showing your eagerness to attack someone on a personal level to invalidate them. The job he did years ago when he was young is no indication of his intellect, personality or work ethic.

It wasn't "years ago" it was around the time he started protesting. It
shows the type of person that he is that he couldn't keep a job as a
janitor.

And in addition to posting on ARS I made an income from running my
computer business.

What's Brian ever done with his life?

>
> > The same guy with the drinking problem?
>
> Really? MORE personal attacks and black PR? You DO realize that you are only validating my point, right?
>

It's true, Brian has turned to alcohol in order to cope with stressful
things in his life.

> I spent several years around him and never witnessed him take a sip, even when the rest of the DC anons were >partying at dinner.

Look, there's video of his own were he shows up at a protest drunk.

>
> > Brian is doing a great job in fucking up his own life all by himself.
>
> He got out of scientology and has encouraged a lot of other people to do so. I'd say he's done "fucking up his life" (as >if anything that comes out of YOUR mouth has any ounce of credibility) and has made some drastic improvements... >like getting away from the cult you have worked for so tirelessly for all these years.

What improvements has he made in his personal life.

Brian left the church of scientology 15 years ago. What's he done in
those 15 years since?

> > While your at it, ask Brian how much money Moxon paid him to stop
> > protesting on the east coast.
>
> Like I care! If they paid him off, good for him.

Of course you don't, because you have no confront on the truth.

The truth his he caved in. I don't respect cavers.

He was supposed to be fighting for principle and he gave up.

>
> > At least I have the courage to post under my own name.
>
> As opposed to the years you posted under "truth seeker"? HAHA Give me a break!
>

But I'm not doing it anymore, why don't you stop and tell us YOUR
name?

Afraid?

>
> > What your name "Kat"?
>
> What a shocker :) OSA asking for an anonymous critics name. Yes, let me give a member of a litigious cult my full name so his buddies can harass me for exercising free speech. HAH!

That's not the real reason and you know it. OSA is so spread thin
right now that they are not what they use to be.

The reason you don't do is because your scared, plain and simple.

>
> > I know, too gutless and chicken shit to say.
>
> Nope. I just don't want you and the rest of OSA calling me up and harassing me like you did Sparrow.

Again, I never harassed Brain. you have your facts wrong.

You don't want to give your real name because you are not strong
enough to deal with the consequences.

There's alot of people that are against the church of scientology that
have been open about their true names and they are still alive to tell
about it.

>
> Our founding fathers understood the importance of anonymous protest. In fact, it's one of our fundamental rights as US citizens. It doesn't make anyone chicken shit.
>
> Thank you, Truthsucker,

"Truthsucker".

First of all, my name is Tim Higgs, "Truth Seeker" is from the past.
I've let it go like you need to get some guts let go of "Kat".

Plus, alter that name the way you did is the same thing OSA did years
ago.

[Kat]

On Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:29:07 AM UTC-4, Timothy Higgs wrote:

>
> First off, I called him because he gave his phone number with the
> purpose that I did call him.

Which is fine and dandy, except that you became increasingly erratic, insulting and hostile as time went on. He didn't mind talking to you till you demonstrated your true personality.

> We were getting along just fine until OSA
> 3rd partied my by passing lies to DC Anonymous and then he pulled back
> from me.

*Yawn* It wasn't OSA, little man. It was me. I saw what you were up to over there. Your IP on the DC forums was the same that was used to "prank" Tori. It was also the same as one of the IP's you used under "Truthseeker" over the years. So I gave that info to HT who discovered your dirty little secret by tracing the IP to it's source.

I also linked years of your posts to demonstrate your behavior. They came to their own conclusions about you.. ironically the same ones that I did. But please, continue your paranoid bullshit rant about how EVERYONE who says anything against you is OSA. It flushes any chance of credibility for you down the toilet.

>
> I only spoke to him once or twice

Liar. You spoke to him far more than that and you also harassed him on Youtube.

> and I was not "posing" as a critic,
> I am a critic.

You are a liar.

>
> It wasn't "years ago" it was around the time he started protesting.

Doesn't matter when he did it. Honest work is nothing to judge others for, neither is them losing a job in this economy without knowing the reasons.

You can try and twist it any way you want to but you are still using ad homs to make your point... which makes you an idiot.

> It
> shows the type of person that he is that he couldn't keep a job as a
> janitor.

No, not really. You are still trying to use an ad hom as the foundation of your argument.

>
> And in addition to posting on ARS I made an income from running my
> computer business.

I highly doubt anything you have to say considering you have lied several times in this thread already. Making a living from running a computer business also does not make you a better person than Sparrow, nor does it make you a good person in general.

>
> What's Brian ever done with his life?

He's encouraged and helped dozens of people to leave a dangerous cult. I consider that pretty significant.

> It's true, Brian has turned to alcohol in order to cope with stressful
> things in his life.

Provided that is true (and I don't believe a word you have to say), that still does not make him less of a person.

Someone who posted Tori's phone number to a sex line also doesn't get to insult others for their morality.

>
> > I spent several years around him and never witnessed him take a sip, even when the rest of the DC anons were >partying at dinner.
>
> Look, there's video of his own were he shows up at a protest drunk.

An adult being drunk isn't a crime, sunshine. Again, attacking him for doing what millions if not billions of people do every once in a while when stressed does not make him less of a person.

>
> What improvements has he made in his personal life.

He's not in a cult. That's a pretty big one. :)

>
> Brian left the church of scientology 15 years ago. What's he done in
> those 15 years since?

Live freely. Good for him. The measure of a man isn't how much money they make or what job they have. If you think that, you are a fool. After all, the most successful people in the world statistically are sociopaths.

>
> Of course you don't, because you have no confront on the truth.

No, I just don't give a shit what you have to say.

Ever hear the saying "consider the source"? Every time I interacted with Sparrow, he was kind to a fault. He was helpful, respectful and funny. Every time I interact with you, you are a paranoid, insulting asshole. Which person do you think I would pay attention to? Which opinion would I deem garbage?

>
> The truth his he caved in. I don't respect cavers.

I don't respect liars. :)

>
> He was supposed to be fighting for principle and he gave up.

One cannot feed themselves on principal, sunshine. If he felt he did all he could and wanted to move on with his life I cannot blame him. It can be incredibly exhausting for some people to talk to closed minded assholes who want to attack and manipulate you simply for saying "I disagree".

Thankfully, I find it hilarious.

>
> >
> > > At least I have the courage to post under my own name.
> >
> > As opposed to the years you posted under "truth seeker"? HAHA Give me a break!
> >
>
> But I'm not doing it anymore, why don't you stop and tell us YOUR
> name?

Because it's funnier this way. :)

>
> Afraid?

Nope :) I just have fun watching slime like you try this exact tactic. It reveals you for what you truly are- an asshole who is more than likely working for OSA.

By the way, several ARS critics know who I am. Many of them even know my life story and why I speak out against $cientology. I only told people who are worth telling. You do not fit into that category.

>
>
> >
> > > What your name "Kat"?
> >
> > What a shocker :) OSA asking for an anonymous critics name. Yes, let me give a member of a litigious cult my full name so his buddies can harass me for exercising free speech. HAH!
>
> That's not the real reason and you know it.

Oh so you know what I think now? Must be your OT stupor powers in action!

> OSA is so spread thin
> right now that they are not what they use to be.

Doesn't matter. I remain anonymous for the people I know who are "in".

>
> The reason you don't do is because your scared, plain and simple.

Again with the assumptions and personal attacks! Yep, you did a good job "leaving" the cult sunshine hahaha

>
>
> Again, I never harassed Brain. you have your facts wrong.

Nope. You are just a liar but you and I both know that already.

>
> You don't want to give your real name because you are not strong
> enough to deal with the consequences.
>
> There's alot of people that are against the church of scientology that
> have been open about their true names and they are still alive to tell
> about it.

Again with the assumptions and personal attacks. Yeeep you took my bait hook line and sinker!

>
> >
> > Our founding fathers understood the importance of anonymous protest. In fact, it's one of our fundamental rights as US citizens. It doesn't make anyone chicken shit.

No comment here? None? What a shocker.

> >
> > Thank you, Truthsucker,
>
> "Truthsucker".
>
> First of all, my name is Tim Higgs, "Truth Seeker" is from the past.

Just because it's "from the past" doesn't change the fact that it is linked to your past and identity. You do not cease to be the person that you were simply because you chose to use your real name over an online handle.

> I've let it go like you need to get some guts let go of "Kat".

Sorry sunshine, but I rather enjoy watching you bend over backwards to find something to attack someone for. It's all I've ever seen you do. Attack attack attack. Since you don't know me and can't attempt to invalidate my opinion by calling me a drunk or a janitor, you have to either lie or find silly things to insult me over.. like me not using my real name.

Do you understand now, sunshine? If not I can try and make it simpler for you. :)

>
> Plus, alter that name the way you did is the same thing OSA did years
> ago.

Except that people know I'm not OSA. I'm just a nerdy lady who stays up waaay too late on saturday nights playing Diablo III and laughing at internet idiots.

Speaking of which, I have cow level runs to give. Tata, Truthsucker!

[Timothy Higgs]

> Which is fine and dandy, except that you became increasingly erratic, insulting and hostile as time went on. He didn't >mind talking to you till you demonstrated your true personality.

I didn't become erratic, Brian started withdrawing and becoming
paranoid based on the fact that someone had 3rd partied my by lying
and telling him that I was OSA.

That's what started things.

We were getting along just fine until OSA
3rd partied my by passing lies to DC Anonymous and then he pulled back
from me.

> Liar. You spoke to him far more than that and you also harassed him on Youtube.

I spoke to him only a few times on the phone and a few emails.

Commenting on his Youtube videos is not speaking to him.

> Doesn't matter when he did it. Honest work is nothing to judge others for, neither is them losing a job in this economy without knowing the reasons.

Brian Mandigo couldn't keep a job as a janitor, fact.

> No, not really. You are still trying to use an ad hom as the foundation of your argument.
>


>

> Ever hear the saying "consider the source"? Every time I interacted with Sparrow, he was kind to a fault. He was >helpful, respectful and funny. Every time I interact with you, you are a paranoid, insulting asshole. Which person do >you think I would pay attention to? Which opinion would I deem garbage?

Yes, the Brian I first became friends with was an ok guy, until 3rd
partying trouble makers like you filled his head full of lies and
shit.

>
> One cannot feed themselves on principal, sunshine.
>

If he can't fight a battle to the end conclusion, he should have never
started the battle.

He was too weak.

> Nope :) I just have fun watching slime like you try this exact tactic. It reveals you for what you truly are- an asshole who is more than likely working for OSA.

Kat, you are a chicken shit coward too gutless and yellow to give your
real name.

No guts or balls.

> What a shocker :) OSA asking for an anonymous critics name. Yes, let me give a member of a litigious cult my full name so his buddies can harass me for exercising free speech. HAH!

Your anonymous because you are too afraid to show yourself. Grow up
and grow a pair. Don't give me that OSA bullshit, your just too damm
chicken and you know it.

>
> > OSA is so spread thin
> > right now that they are not what they use to be.
>
> Doesn't matter. I remain anonymous for the people I know who are "in".

Does matter, what are you so afraid of?

[John Dorsay]

On 7/6/2012 5:09 PM, Timothy Higgs wrote:

> I didn't become erratic, Brian started withdrawing and becoming
> paranoid based on the fact that someone had 3rd partied my by lying
> and telling him that I was OSA.

So you were freelancing when you forged multiple articles in
Tory/Magoo's name, and posted *her* phone number in bondage
newsgroups? OSA had nothing to do with that? You must be quite the guy.


With all due respect,


John

[Kat]

On Friday, July 6, 2012 5:09:54 PM UTC-4, Timothy Higgs wrote

What a glorious day! I bought some new shoes, ate thai for dinner and now I get to bat you around like a ball of string until you unravel. My life truly is blessed.

>
> I didn't become erratic, Brian started withdrawing and becoming
> paranoid based on the fact that someone had 3rd partied my by lying
> and telling him that I was OSA.

Actually no, that's not what happened. I've told you what happened but as you seem incapable of registering when you are in the wrong, you persist with this OSA lie.

>
> That's what started things.
>
> We were getting along just fine until OSA
> 3rd partied my by passing lies to DC Anonymous and then he pulled back
> from me.

As I said before, it was *me* that warned DC anons of your history on usenet and I am not OSA. Several old guard know my real name and know I was never in.

I recognized your posting name on the DC forums and after mentioning it, HT researched your IP. She found all sorts of nuggets like your "pranks" on Tori.

Ultimately, you have only yourself to blame for his distrust as you were dumb enough to use the same IP to troll Tori and register for the DC Anon forums.

>
> > Liar. You spoke to him far more than that and you also harassed him on Youtube.
>
> I spoke to him only a few times on the phone and a few emails.

Oh so now it wasn't just a few phone calls, but was emails and youtube comments as well? Would you like to revise your story any further or are you going to wait till I confront you on your next lie?

>
> Commenting on his Youtube videos is not speaking to him.

So leaving posts on his youtube channel directed at/to him specifically is not speaking "to him"? How very... passive- aggressive of you. I'd suggest seeking therapy but as you are still "in" the cult, I doubt you would seek professional help.

>
> > Doesn't matter when he did it. Honest work is nothing to judge others for, neither is them losing a job in this economy without knowing the reasons.
>
> Brian Mandigo couldn't keep a job as a janitor, fact.

Losing a job doesn't mean bo diddly squat about who he is as a person without knowing the "why". Even if he lost his job for some horrible reason that was his own fault, it would also not change the fact that you have lied throughout this conversation.

>
> Yes, the Brian I first became friends with was an ok guy, until 3rd
> partying trouble makers like you filled his head full of lies and
> shit.

What lies? I pointed to your old posts. The IP used both by truthseeker on usenet and to troll Tori matched the one you registered with on DC anon forums. They traced your IP to a scientologist owned medical practice in a little Maryland strip mall. All I did was tell the truth and let them come to their own conclusions after examining the evidence.

Again, you have only yourself to blame.

>
> If he can't fight a battle to the end conclusion, he should have never
> started the battle.
>
> He was too weak.

More personal attacks to draw attention away from YOUR behavior? Tsk tsk, you haven't left the cult yet sunshine.

>
> Kat, you are a chicken shit coward too gutless and yellow to give your
> real name.

*Yawn* Whatever you need to tell yourself to sleep at night, little man.

>
> No guts or balls.

At least I have brains, which is more than you have sunshine. By the way, telling a woman she doesn't have balls is hilaaaaaarious!

>
>
> > What a shocker :) OSA asking for an anonymous critics name. Yes, let me give a member of a litigious cult my full name so his buddies can harass me for exercising free speech. HAH!
>
> Your anonymous because you are too afraid to show yourself. Grow up
> and grow a pair. Don't give me that OSA bullshit, your just too damm
> chicken and you know it.

LOL! You are seriously going to continue with this? Let me spell it out for ya sunshine. I don't give my personal information because I do not want the cult to harass the people I know who are still in. I do not want their families or friends to be lost, harassed, abused, manipulated or their safety compromised.

Your continued insistence that I reveal my personal information after I have expressed my concern tells me something very important: you don't care one iota about the well being of those people. All you want is to find something to personally attack ME for so you can try and invalidate me with character assassination like you do Sparrow.

***~-> You care more about sating your ego and your destructive purpose than the well being of innocent people who will be hurt by a dangerous cult should my identity be known. <-~***

>
> Does matter, what are you so afraid of?

I'm afraid for them being harassed or forced to disconnect with their families as a result of being friends with a known critic. A supposed "critic" such as yourself should be aware of that being a problem within the organization.

In fact, you spend so much time talking about how OSA supposedly ruined your friendship with Sparrow that I wonder why you would persist in this line of attack. If they have enough resources and willpower to supposedly follow you around and interfere with your image, to "frame" you as OSA, that would give them the time and energy to do the same to me or others.

All I have seen you act as a critic for are critics of $cientology. You insult, attack and lie - going right for low blows and trying to discredit anything they have to say by using ad hom attacks. You have repeated this behavior through our discussion, aimed at both myself and at Brian. You just have very little to insult me over (because you don't know me) besides my anonymity so you stick with that.

Bottom line - Brian stopped talking to you because you are a terrible person.