DM and the Gang Bang Sec Check
Rene Descartes
sec check I thought, "How can somebody do something like that to people?".
What kind of person feels justified to force somebody to sit there and
go through that kind of abuse?
Has DM come to his senses since then?
Does he realize that that was just plain wrong?
Has he ever had to make testimony to a court regarding that?
Has he publicly apologized to the people he did this to?
Do they still do these things?
Just wondering
RD00
Phil Chitester
> When I first visited the Stacy Brooks site and read about the gang bang
> sec check I thought, "How can somebody do something like that to people?".
It sure sounds very bad in those apostate accounts. But one should
keep in mind that these 'victims' were misbehaving and badly and were
strongly under the influence of their cases. And that anything anyone
did to them would appear harmful to them later in retrospect
(conveniently), no matter how humanely they were actually treated.
And that often these people just distort events like crazy after the
fact to gain sympathy or accomplish revenge.
One should remember that a sec-check is confessional auditing and
serves the purpose of unburdening the individual of his/her misdeeds.
> What kind of person feels justified to force somebody to sit there and
> go through that kind of abuse?
What they attempt to accomplish in such things is not bad, therefore
no justification is mandatory. They are attempting to pull witholds,
not abuse people. The apostates, through multiple distortions and
innuendoes, have attempted to make it appear to have been quite
different than it actually was.
> Has DM come to his senses since then?
Only someone who has strayed would be expected to do so. There is no
evidence (except in deluded criminal minds) that he has.
> Does he realize that that was just plain wrong?
He can't be expected to realize such a thing when it never happened
the way they say it did.
> Has he ever had to make testimony to a court regarding that?
Regarding what? Things which never happened?
> Has he publicly apologized to the people he did this to?
What people did he 'do something to?' What did he 'do to them?'
Whose testimony are you believing when you ask that question? What is
the true nature of that testimony?
> Do they still do these things?
Do what things? Things critics make up in stories which imply things
that they did? Hardly likely as those are just
fabrications/distortions.
> Just wondering
No mystery really.
> RD00
Sec-checks are anti-brainwashing. This is the apostate brainwashing
newsgroup. Obviously they'd never be popular here.
Perhaps that is not yet a concept for you, that such a thing actually
exists, as a technique dedicated to penetrating through people's
multiple layers of anti-religious/anti-spiritual invader force
brainwashing and implanting to get to core witholds which are making
them or tending to cause them to act badly, before they (those who are
behaving badly) are offloaded (released into a defenseless
environment).
It's just another service wherein the Church attempts to make it a
better world for the rest of us. You should just be grateful.
Phil
Tanya Durni
Phil Chitester wrote:
Thanks for posting. You do make your point so perfectly clear!
Tommy
"Tanya Durni" <tdu...@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
news:3CF84A49...@rochester.rr.com...
Phil's the most effective critic on the board.
I'm glad he's here. He does my job so much better than I possibly could...
Tommy
--
Thank you for your very detailed letter regarding
Scientology. We haven't yet found a way to attack
these jackals who feed on children and young adults
who are too emotionally weak to stand by themselves
when they reach the age of consent.
Congressman Leo J. Ryan, shortly before being gunned down
by another cult in Jonestown
Phil Chitester
And you misinterpret it, assume there are no facts stated therein,
only lies, and assume that in fact what the apostates liars say is
true, is.
What more could an a.r.s. poster ask for in a reader, than complete
misduplication and disagreement, copious make-wrong, and blatant
stupidity?
It's just another 'service' wherein critics attempt to make it a
dreadfully horrible and lifeless world for the rest of us. I suppose
you would say I should just be grateful.
Phil
Rene Descartes
You should be grateful that someday the entire world will know about this
"wonderful" 'service' that the Co$ has to offer to public for the mere
price of thousands of dollars per intensive. I bet you can't wait to see
people fighting for a place in line, eager to be gang banged by the sec checkers.
You should be grateful that the smiling man on the stage will continue to
make this "wonderful" 'service' available to all the enthusiastic people
in the world, all looking forward to the abuse of being gang banged by
the sec checkers for the mere cost of about 5 years of their pension/401K
retirement benefits.
What a wonderful way to spend their hard earned dollars!
Oh wait a sec, if they join the sea org, they might be able to get this
"wonderful" 'service' for free!
RD00
Dave Bird
Chitester <dpchi...@yahoo.com> writes:
>renedes...@hotmail.com (Rene Descartes) wrote in message news:<b9e50dcd.020
>
>> When I first visited the Stacy Brooks site and read about the gang bang
>> sec check I thought, "How can somebody do something like that to people?".
>
>It sure sounds very bad in those apostate accounts.
Sure. So does locking up Lisa MacPherson for 17 days without proper
food and drink until she died consequent on dehydration, having lost
one third her body weight. The way those apostates tell it, it does.
Where as, the way some Church <spit> of Scientology members tell it,
you would think they were doing Lisa a favour by killing her.
--
' ' ' .:::. ' :: ' ' 'what do Scientologists say when ' http://www.
' (o\ /o) .::. ' you ask why their money-grubbing ' xemu.demon.
' \ " / XEMU ' killed a woman by starvation? ' co.uk '
' '-' :::: ' - - - -http://www.lisatrust.net - ' ' ' ' ' ' '
' :v: \'''| ' BIGOT BIGOT BIGOT '
' ;;\:::/;;\/ / ' OO / / \ ? '
' ;;;;;;;;;BEER ' (~~) .00 @@-._ \ '
' WithAKick\/ ' ( ) ( =) (O ) ( ") (" )
' 'LikeAnHBomb ' ' ' ' ^^^^ ' ' ^^ ^^ ' ' ' ' ^^ ^^ ' ' "" ' ""
see the famous frogs at http://members.home.net/bwarr1/Movie2.html