Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Boston Org's Ideal org

186 views
Skip to first unread message

Patty Pieniadz

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 10:26:54 AM12/13/07
to
Android Cat posted a link to this site a while back, but I just
got a chance to look at it. Boston Org was the Org that
I was connected with when I was in. I see a lot of
familiar faces in the virtual tour link. It's sad to see
that so many of them are still in.

Per this site, they are purchasing a new building
on the corner of Mass Ave and Washington St.
in the South End. There's a lot more foot traffic
there, but somehow I doubt this new location will
help them very much.


http://idealorgboston.org

http://idealorgboston.org/contributors.html


Boston's Ideal Org

Revolutionary Honor Roll!

New Civilization Builder

Stephen & Cheryl Jonas

Silver Humanitarian

Bob & Lorraine Baritz
Lorna and Alan Crichton


Humanitarian with Honors

Art McAuley, Victoria Porras & Carlos Porras
Laura and Ric Poulin
Manuel and Katia and Phillip Vianna

Humanitarian

Chuck Prenner and Joanne Cali
Brian and Cindy Fandetti
Guy and Jamilia Grant


Sponsor with Honors

Dick Chisholm
Jim & Linda Doering
Carolyn Hamm
Mike & Gail Hoyt
Jay Koutavas
Joel & Karen Kurtzman
Boston OT Committee
Artists For A Better World

New Ideal Org Patron

Ray Bloom

Vanguard

Mitra & Richard Fitzgerald
Joe Stover & Jean Gordon
Scott & Jerri Menaul
Jim & Janice Plumb

Sponsor

Jessie Cuddy
Allen & Jane Grondin
Otan Logi & Komra Moriko
Edward & Pamela Maher
John Roberge
Curt & Anne Strickland

Key Contributor

Lee & Donna Alessandrini
Charles T. Angus
Carlo and Doreen Barbara
Larry & Jessica Byrnes
Doris Bell
John Coale
Andy & Liza Cowenhoven
Michele & David Drew
Frank DeSilva
Matthew & Kathy Feshbach
Joe Fougere
Scott & Rue Ann Furbish
Christopher & Peggy Harrison
Amy Hilliard & Frank O'Donnell
Craig & Sally Jensen
Duncan Lorien & Sallee Slagle
Craig & Fran Mackay
Don & Diana Marshall
Tom & Eileen Norton
Joe & Phyllis Nuccio
Fred & Stephanie Oxaal
Robert M. Ramer
Barbara Roy
Jonathan & Amie Saphire
Brian & Pat Smith


Contributing Member

Don Blackwell
Bob & Caroline Carter
John Carvalho
Robert & Ksenia Castagna
Thadd Comstock & Elaine Merkel
Julie Crane & Ben Little
Rebecca Crocker
Eileen Cummings
Scott & Holly D'Ambra
Jim & Sharen Forsyth
Jay Fernandes
Jonathan Freeman
Michael Harrison
Fred Hommel
Yury Kirichok
Mike LaRosee
Damon Lequin
John & Nancy Loomis
Alan & Sue Lubold
Jeff & Kyle Mahler
Rosemary Mangan
Ron McKenzie
Ed Moscaritolo & Betsy Bartlett
Bob Newey
Alberto Paralle
Fred & Corrine Perkins
Boris Podolsky
Randy Schaetzke
Joseph Scoglio & Jeanne Deva
Jill Sellenriek
John & Mary Smith
David Supple
Julian Webb
Austin Wei
David & Nancy Westgate
Igor Yatskar

Supporting Member

Alba Family
Alex & Connie Amore
Gary & Milagros Barcus
David & Mark Baritz
Donald Barrett
Ray & Pam Barton
Jamie Blackstone
Carl Borowski
Mark & Debbie Boucher
Jennifer Trusedale-Brogan
Barton Bruce
Cindy & George Bruce
Dr. Julie Burke
Charles Butler
Herb Cabral
Roderick Camelia
Kim and Seth Carbonneau
Mark Chiungos
Mary Collins
Bess Currier
Michael Darche
Tom Dewyngart
Brian & Jennifer Duffy
Alvaro Dias
Cliff & Liza Dufresne
Maria Di Liegro
Alan & Anne Dupre
Heather Emerson
Kurt & Kannon Feshbach
Tim & Nicole Fiorillo
Doug & Joanne Forsythe
Karen Foster
Chris Garrison
Marina Geller
Fred Hall
Greg & Darlene Hancock
Kerry & Emilie Hann
Rick & Nancy Hickey
Peter Hill
Bruce Hilliard
Tom Hughes
Lisa Hunt
Corey & Diana Jadin
Zack Jonas
Vahe & Lara Kantarjian
Steven Kieras
Cary Kilner
Andy Ladd & Heidi Buxton
Lois Mann
Lorine Matthews
David Mobed
John & Barbara Morris
Brian & Karen Oulighan
Michael O'Neill
Dan O'Shea
Michael & Devorah Phillips
Randy & Kay Plasch
Terry Raftery
Roger & Jill Reckis
Eric Rennie
Renee Rice
Kelly Riley
Jeff & Trish Rouelle
Ron & Pam Savelo
Michael Scaggs
Russ Seibert
Yury & Sharon Shenkar
Michael & Maureen St. Amand
James Watson
Paul Whitehead
Paul Whelan
Joe Urich
Mike Zawistowski

Patty


Dave Touretzky

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 11:12:16 AM12/13/07
to

The current Boston Org is in a beautiful old building that underwent
extensive restoration 10 years ago (with member labor). I thought it
already WAS an Ideal Org; lots of space, lots of rich wood paneling,
and it has a lovely view of the Charles River. The building must be
worth a fortune. And yet... no bodies in the shop.

Why does Scn think they need a new building in Boston? It still
won't put bodies in the shop. They'd have more luck setting up
crack house than trying to lure people into Scientology.

Nobody's buying their crap anymore.

-- Dave

Magoo

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 11:39:23 AM12/13/07
to

"Dave Touretzky" <d...@cs.cmu.edu> wrote in message
news:476159e0$1...@news2.lightlink.com...

Good point, Dave and Patty! This isn't their new buildings---but for people
lurking or who haven't seen what the Boston Org looks like (and it's
Staff)---
check out: Magoo: Dancing in Boston at www.xenutv.com
It truly shows the depth of their mind control.

They can buy new buildings, but as long as they and their organization (C of
S) continue to spread "Fair Game"...they
and any other "Org" have next to zero chance to truly expand.

Would *you* join with people like that?

Happy Holidays :)

Tory/Magoo~~~


Genesis

unread,
Dec 13, 2007, 12:21:38 PM12/13/07
to

"Dave Touretzky" <d...@cs.cmu.edu> wrote in message
news:476159e0$1...@news2.lightlink.com...
>

The cult knows it can't make money anymore with the members
buying courses.
So it invests in real-estate. And it milks it's members for as much
as possible to pay for the buildings and repairs. Look at Buffalo.
You can't lose with real estate. Plus
the cult gets the suckers to do most of the work, making these
building worth even more $$$.
The cult will be worth millions if not more for a long time to come
of course as you said Dave, they will remain mostly empty.

I think you already knew that Dave ;^P

Genesis


Ted

unread,
Dec 14, 2007, 1:22:48 AM12/14/07
to
Patty Pieniadz <ppie...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Android Cat posted a link to this site a while back, but I just
> got a chance to look at it. Boston Org was the Org that
> I was connected with when I was in. I see a lot of
> familiar faces in the virtual tour link. It's sad to see
> that so many of them are still in.
>
> Per this site, they are purchasing a new building
> on the corner of Mass Ave and Washington St.
> in the South End. There's a lot more foot traffic
> there, but somehow I doubt this new location will
> help them very much.


Foot traffic! LOL

A green grocer needs foot traffic, a liquor store needs foot traffic, a
hair salon needs foot traffic, a resturant needs foot traffic...

When your services cost an arm and a leg, you need something other than
foot traffic.


--
Ted

roger gonnet

unread,
Dec 14, 2007, 1:30:28 AM12/14/07
to
"Patty Pieniadz" <ppie...@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de
news:5sd1a4F...@mid.individual.net...

> Android Cat posted a link to this site a while back, but I just
> got a chance to look at it. Boston Org was the Org that
> I was connected with when I was in. I see a lot of
> familiar faces in the virtual tour link. It's sad to see
> that so many of them are still in.
>
> Per this site, they are purchasing a new building
> on the corner of Mass Ave and Washington St.
> in the South End. There's a lot more foot traffic
> there, but somehow I doubt this new location will
> help them very much.
>
>
> http://idealorgboston.org
>
> http://idealorgboston.org/contributors.html

Fine list. This should total much more than one million, since it's probable
that the very first donors were at $ 250000, the next at $ 100000, etc.
So...

Second figure: only 162 scientology members or member names (families
giving alltogether).
For Boston, a 550000 souls with a 5,5 million souls surroundings area?
That's a really high level of infiltration for some 300 members of the
fastest growing 'religion' in the world. After how many years there? Half a
century?

But the greedy cultic hardsellers called here "Fundraisers" (see
http://idealorgboston.org/donate.html) - paid to get more juice out of the
lemon-donors - should be sent before judges for this fraud added to the
other practiced by the cult.

They can't ignore that the crime cult uses hardsales and has more than
enough money to pay for perfectly unuseful embellishments, and that perhaps
such "embellishments" are only made to get more bankable offices when the
cult will be bankrupt!

r

Quaoar

unread,
Dec 14, 2007, 1:44:31 AM12/14/07
to

Kevin Trudeau?

Q

Android Cat

unread,
Dec 14, 2007, 1:57:24 AM12/14/07
to

Note that most of the activity on the site dates back to 2005. (Ahahaha!
They're blocking the Wayback archive from looking at previous versions of
the site.)

--
Ron of that ilk.


realpch

unread,
Dec 15, 2007, 2:19:26 AM12/15/07
to

Toaster give-aways.

Whoops! that might be considered "out exchange".

Peach
--
Extra! Extra! Read All About It!
Save some dough, save some grief:
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.scientology-lies.com

0 new messages