Koos "telepathically audits" Jutta, mother of his three children

[John Dorsay]

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.spiritual.enhancement/msg/c93df3953dca2fd4?hl=en-GB&dmode=source&output=gplain

Insane formatting removed.


21 December 1997

RI-984i 'The Criminal Mind - Cowards Don't Dare Create Life - VITAL
DATA'

from Ambassador for Mankind

Message # RI-984i for Internet

(Shareware-value 10 US$)

(Also appearing in the RDS-series, the "Resolving Domination Series.")

'You have to rise above the idea of "not deserving" and of
"punishment", and get used to the idea, in all situations, that good
is creating survival and that destroying survival IS evil.'

'And the truth of it is only: PEOPLE ARE GOOD WHEN - AND AS SOON AS
- THEY CREATE GOOD EFFECTS. THEY ARE BAD WHEN THEY CREATE - AND AS
SOON AS THEY CREATE - BAD EFFECTS.'

'He and others had, and have the idea that once one had been very
evil, one can't be called a good person anymore.

'And therefore one had an excuse 1. To say it is no USE to make any
effort to be good, "because one never will be called good by others
anymore." 2. To destroy - in order to create a good image of oneself
- the awareness of others (and self) about times of having been
evil, or destroy their or own ability to be aware of it.'

'Ambassador for Mankind'

The vital data is spread over this RI-Bulletin, especially inside
the Notes.

Vital, vital data, that will get you to understand and handle
criminals or those whom you never suspected but are heavy criminals
of the blackest kind, who dominate others with a glance.

Solo-Confessional(*) of Jutta Nolst Trenite, on 3 September 1997,
07:40 GMT, ordered by Ambassador for Mankind.

[Solo-Auditor(**):] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "It would make Koos wrong for keeping his position, LFBD
facing non-survival intentions, facing intentions to destroy him,
facing intentions to destroy life, LFBD =A0 facing the evil
intentions to destroy life of anyone whom Koos detects as having
these evil intentions." F(***)

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "'To run away' would make Koos wrong for facing F evil
intentions of others to destroy life, for facing these intentions
and disagreeing with them." LF

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "'To run away' would make Koos wrong for disagreeing with
evil intentions LFBD(***) to destroy life and for devising means to
survive and for helping others to survive." LFBD

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "'To run away' would make Koos wrong - for keeping his
position, - for keeping his viewpoint, - for disagreeing with the
destructive intentions of L. Ron Hubbard, F Richard Reiss, F me,
Jutta, F Koos' father, F Koos' mother, F Noel, Freya, (...), (...).

"It would make Koos wrong for wanting to help anyone - who has evil
intentions - not to have evil intentions on life, but to contribute
to life. LF

"My 'me running away' would make Koos wrong for HELPING anyone
[including me, Jutta] when he has evil intentions [when he feels
compelled to destroy the aliveness and awareness of others]."

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "I would [and do] blame others who [as anyone does] have
suppressive intentions, that THEY are running away from life. (I
accuse them, instead of to indicate to them their true intention and
to disagree with their execution of it.)

"That's what they are actually doing. LFBD

"They ARE running away from life: - they are refusing to duplicate
the Realities [viewpoints, problems, ideas, likes and dislikes] of
others, - they are refusing to solve problems in such a way that
there is survival [for all concerned], - they want to have nothing
to do with others, - they want to destroy others, - they want to
destroy life." LFBD [As do I, Jutta, by running away myself from
facing what is actually there.]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "It would make me right for 'Being a Victim to' [WANTING my
life destroyed by] those who [also] run away from life, who [also]
refuse to contribute, who [also] have decided to destroy life." LF

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "It would make me right for blaming such other Suppressive
Persons (see Footnote), who want to run away from life and who
refuse to contribute, [blaming THEM - NOT admitting that it was
ENTIRELY my own decision to be a coward, even though I can face life
very well and enjoy doing so when I decide to do so - I blame
OTHERS] for MY running away, LF - with the justification that there
must be places in the world where there are no Suppressives [who
remind me of my OWN intentions to destroy and punish others and who
WANT me to not control my evil], LF or where there are ALSO people
who like to contribute LF's [WITHOUT looking at the fact that I HAVE
BEEN very evil and without looking at the fact that I still destroy
the awareness of others by 'zapping' them with bursts of my
spiritual energy].

[Jutta:] "'To run away', means, to find a place in the world where I
do NOT need to disagree, disagree, disagree with suppression, LF but
where from the very beginning [immediately and always] I get
agreement on contribution to survival. LF

[That others immediately and always do what SHE wants of them,
regardless of what THEY want, and they should immediately do what
SHE wants, because 'THAT is survival for everybody', even though she
flatly refuses to look at what others ARE doing that is survival and
even though she flatly refuses to care and take responsibility for
others. In other words: Where she is allowed to be a 'powerful'
tyrant dominating all others into facing all non-survival FOR her,
so she 'can live'. (Note by Koos)]

[Jutta:] "What did I get when I ran away in 1790 [at my death as
Benjamin Franklin]?

"I ran to a place [the Implant Station on Mars] where there was and
is the BIGGEST disagreement with survival and with contribution,
where there was and is no agreement AT ALL about survival and about
contribution. (see RI-833i 'Between-lives Implanter on Mars' of 22
Apr 1997 http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-833i.htm)

[Note by Koos: In actual fact, as we know now (on 21 December 1997),
he then wanted to be completely unaware of the fact that he, in
earlier lifetimes, had been extremely evil, as described for
instance in RI-983i 'Jutta Blackmailed for Eternity by Reiss...' 17
Dec 97 (http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-983i.htm).
In actual fact, Benjamin Franklin was reminded by the opponent in
his life, - a Mr. Arthur Lee, whom Franklin did not face very well -
that he also had slumbering, dormant intentions to be very, very
evil to himself and to others.

Jutta says now that the reason they remained slumbering, during
almost all of her lifetime as Benjamin Franklin, was that she kept
her friendship with her father, the father of Benjamin Franklin, who
taught her to be decent and caring, whom she says was (or reminds
her) of Koos.

The truth is that Jutta does control her destructive intentions to
the degree that and how strongly she decides to be a friend of Koos,
to let Koos be a friend to her, that is.

And when she runs away from Koos, she is entirely evil and destroys
life and wants to destroy others and drive them insane "to punish
them" for whatever reason suits her.

In 1788, Benjamin Franklin decided "to not care for people anymore"
and to seek ways to make himself "stay 'good'."

He and others had, and have the idea that once one had been very
evil, one can't be called a good person anymore.

And therefore one had an excuse 1. To say it is no USE to make any
effort to be good, "because one never will be called good by others
anymore." 2. To destroy - in order to create a good image of oneself
- the awareness of others (and self) about times of having been
evil, or destroy their or own ability to be aware of it.

Very "logical." But when one decides to be not evil, like Benjamin
Franklin did most of his life, one IS good. Good is defined as
creating survival.

But these guys make it into some personal thing. And they encourage
each other to think that - because they have been criminal, very
criminal at one time - they "can't be decent." This is utter
nonsense. They DID WANT TO BE CRIMINAL, and were. They then WANTED
TO STOP BEING CRIMINAL and did.

But they don't like to admit that they WERE criminal, because
"people would not want to be with them, would consider them
dangerous", and so they invent all these crazy concepts that "they
can only be good if they hide the evil that they had done", or "only
if others don't know about it" OR ONLY IF THEY MAKE THEMSELVES
UNAWARE OF THE EVIL THEY HAD DONE IN THE PAST AND IF THEY AVOID, RUN
AWAY FROM AND/OR SPIRITUALLY 'ZAP' INTO NOT LOOKING AT THEM, ANYBODY
WHO REMINDS THEM OF, OR LOOKS AT THEIR PAST EVIL.

Well, that's again being evil "in order to stay good." The whole
concept of good is completely lost on them.

They have been so evil and destructive to others that they feel the
whole of life can better be seen as a personal game, where others
exist mainly in one's thoughts and one can create or destroy others
(their aliveness, their awareness) without that it really affects them.

And they 'zap' people and that gives them a feeling of "power": They
CAN make themselves "good" by preventing others from seeing their
evil. The trick - which they manage - is of course to spiritually
'zap' another without him noticing WHO did it. And they are VERY
GOOD at 'zapping' another and make him believe that he 'zapped'
himself, or that his best friend did it. Those are the most vital
tricks of their trade. (see also RI-107i '...Ultimate Third Party
Reiss' 13 Mar 95
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-107i.htm)

They get to define 'good' as "having a good opinion of themselves",
as "others confirming their good opinion of themselves." They get to
define 'good' as "being aware only of their own good intentions, and
not of the evil they did or still feel compelled to do." Only then
CAN they be good, they like to say.

But 'good' is creating survival effects, mainly survival effects for
self AND for others.

And that's all there is to it.

IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO, AT ALL, WITH HOW EVIL ONE WAS BEFORE.

But as described above, people who have been evil want to introduce
all kinds of concepts which have nothing to do with being good:

Like 'punishment for evil', like 'punishment for being aware of
evil', like 'having the OPINION of oneself of "being a good person"
IS being good', like 'nobody knowing about their past - past lives
included - is necessary in order to be good.'

And the truth of it is only: PEOPLE ARE GOOD WHEN - AND AS SOON AS -
THEY CREATE GOOD EFFECTS. THEY ARE BAD WHEN THEY CREATE - AND AS
SOON AS THEY CREATE - BAD EFFECTS.

All the rest is just mechanisms to MAKE others evil, to MAKE others
decide that "They can't be good, because...".

It is the ideas that criminals use, to try and MAKE you, me and
others follow our impulses to hate others, to hate ourselves, to
destroy others, to destroy ourselves, to stop being alive and active.

And WE HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE THAN TO STAND UP TO THESE ATTACKS ON US.

There is and will always be a continuous bombardment of these ideas
on us, with greater or lesser spiritual force of energy depending on
the spiritual force of the criminal who spreads them.

The more of us stand up to them, the easier it gets for all of us to
stand up to them.

Jutta has decided, once again, on 17 October 1997, NOT to stand up
to these mechanisms that enforce evil, but to fully give into them,
those mechanisms as generated by her and others and bombarded onto
her and others in particular by Richard Reiss (see RI-983i 'Jutta
Blackmailed for Eternity by Reiss...'
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-983i.htm) and then
also to not control anymore her own ideas about why she should and
wants to destroy her own awareness, and that of others.

To get back to the subject of Benjamin Franklin, he, in 1788,
decided that he had caused himself to be entirely in control of his
evil impulses, and he - VERY INSANELY wanting himself to have all
the very unbecoming glory - denied that it was his father who had
essentially and substantially helped him to control his evil side.

And so his evil side came up again: Franklin decided HE was "great",
so "great" that NOW he did not have to care for others, for Mankind,
anymore.

You see, according to the definition of good, he, with that
decision, which he executed also since 1788, IMMEDIATELY WAS A BAD
PERSON.

But NOT according to the criminal's definition of "good."

And so Benjamin Franklin, in 1790, shortly after his death, EXECUTED
his intention to be made completely unaware of his bad side, as if
it would not exist, for all eternity, AND to never be reminded of
all his previous lives' decisions to be forcefully and intelligently
evil to others and to confuse them and destroy others' awareness -
the main reminder of him having enjoyed to be very evil in the past,
was the person of Richard Reiss.

Franklin executed this intention to destroy his own awareness of
himself and of others, by going to the Implanters with their
"zapping-machines", and letting himself be totally overwhelmed till
he decided he would be "a nothing forever" with no awareness of his
friends, no awareness of his decency, of his bad side, awareness of
nothing.

This took a few days in that Implant machine which 'zaps' energy to
a spirit in a similar way as he has 'zapped' others by direct
SPIRITUAL energy (not mechanical at all), as HE had 'zapped' others
into unawareness and into confusion and as he, now called Jutta, and
other criminals are still doing it to others also at present.

And he did not - CANNOT WIN THAT GAME - because spirits of this
caliber can not make themselves "dead forever", or "unaware forever."

Actually they are by their decision to stop all life for themselves,
also creating the intention to stop their friends.

But they exactly try not to be aware of their friends, so, their
friends "better not tell them" that they feel badly affected, feel
stopped by them.

The only response or reply is big 'zaps' of spiritual energy on
their friends: "Don't bother me, I am trying to destroy you!! So
that I am not aware of your existence! So that I can say to myself
you don't exist!"

And Benjamin Franklin did all these things, in 1790 in the Implant
station, after his death. (see RI-133i 'Benjamin Franklin's right to
NOT be' of 31 Mar 1995
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-133i.htm)

And Jutta is trying to do it right now, especially since her running
away on 17 October 1997, for a whole month we, her family-members,
got lighting storms of spiritual 'zapping' from her: "You don't
exist!! I am 'great'! I can be as evil to others and to myself as I
please, and feel 'powerful and great' for making you destroy your
awareness of what I actually am doing to you and to others and to
myself!"

And on 3 December 1997 I got her, by one and a half month of
telepathically Auditing her, to see the fact that we actually DO
exist no matter how hard she attempts to destroy our existences both
in the physical universe and in the spiritual universe.

And I got her to let go of Richard Reiss for a short while, and she
told someone that she HAS a family and that she wants to sell him a
painting in order to care for Koos and her children, and this person
then bought for a decent price of which the next day Jutta, still
wanting to continue to not be faced in any way, still wanting to go
back to criminality or "Serenity" without restraint, sent the money
- in order that she could stay hidden - to our Electricity Company
who then transferred it to us.

I have never managed, this lifetime, to get Jutta to stop her game
of wanting to be made evil by Richard Reiss (so evil that she mixes
up what are her own evil intentions and what are those of Richard
Reiss and of course she can't control them then) for longer than a
day - in which she then creates a lot of survival, and is a good person.

After she is good, she wants to "feel good", have herself have the
opinion that she is now 'a good being' (which she defines wrongly
and impossibly) WITHOUT BEING GOOD, WITHOUT CREATING SURVIVAL,
WITHOUT CONTROLLING HER BAD SIDE.

She has two solutions

1. To be a "powerful" Tyrant who can spiritually 'zap' anyone into
unawareness or inactivity or into doing what she wants. That is, she
is too cowardly to be decent (this is her 'going to' Richard Reiss
and definitely her running away from Koos).

2. To neither find anything wrong with her own evil side, nor with
the evil side of others, and to remain in a sort of cloudy state of,
by consequence, having no responsibility for what she does in the
physical universe to others or for what others do to her or to
others. That is, she is too cowardly to take any survival action or
to evaluate any action of self or others towards survival. This is
too cowardly to live. It is near suicide. This is her present state
(21 December 1997). (This is her 'going to' L. Ron Hubbard and his
"Serenity" attitude.)

But she still has an unbelievably ugly, unbelievably evil, hidden
game going on right now, which is underlying this, as you will see
further below.]

[Jutta:] "When I am running away from Koos, I am running away from
where there is a huge agreement on contribution (on giving and
receiving contribution) and a huge agreement on creating survival
LFBD and a huge agreement that there CAN be and SHOULD be survival."

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "For refusing to face any evil intentions [because they
remind me of my own evil intentions, and they force me to either
control my own evil intentions, or to decide to follow my own evil
intentions completely, as I do not want to admit that I mostly do
operate by making others less aware or less active and want to
punish them with spiritual force unless they do what I want them to
do or not do (and that is WITHOUT looking at what they want and
need). (Note by Koos)].

"FOR REFUSING TO STAY STABLE when there is any - pressure, - 'make
wrong', - invalidating, - intention to kick me out of spaces. LFBDBD

"'To run away' would make me right for considering that 'SOMEWHERE
THERE IS A PLACE where all this pressure, invalidating, kicking out
does not exist.'

"Oh yeah?

"That must be the 'Serenity' space [viewpoint]! LFBD

[L. Ron Hubbard's (most cowardly, viciously and arrogantly "being
above" all aliveness and "being above" all desires to defend life
and decency and "being above" and "greater than" all people who DO
defend aliveness and decency, AND accusing and blaming and lying
about people who DO try to be decent and alive and caring for
others) his "Serenity"-doctrine of "You are and feel 'Invulnerable'
and 'Great' and 'All is fine', when you DON'T create aliveness and
when you DON'T protect your own life nor the life of others AND when
you demand to be admired by others for your state of 'Being Senior
to Life'."

He is just a complete COWARD, but represents it as "Being above life"!

Jutta is suffering very heavily and frequently from attacks of this
particular mental disease in which one does not "need to face life
nor opposition to life", but where one is - in one's own
imagination, that is - "invulnerable", and in fact destroys all life.

This "Serenity"-doctrine is described in RI-847i 'Diana Ross: The
Poison of Admiration' of 30 Apr 1997
(http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-847i.htm) and in
many other RI-Bulletins
(http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html).]

[Jutta:] "Where there is a strong agreement on 'NO disagreement
allowed here' [which is complete APATHY and total COWARDICE, and
calling it making everybody feel great, but it is EXTREMELY UGLY,
AND VERY DEAD].

LFBD's-F/Nind [=3D a truth found out]

"'Serenity'-'think': 'No disagreement allowed here.' 'We must always
work towards agreement!' 'Disagreement does NOT bring about survival.'

"Now, I [happen to] know it DOES bring about survival to disagree
[to disagree with someone's destruction and treachery and lies]!"

F/Nind

[Koos:] This is not a Floating (E-meter-)Needle(***) that indicates
'Release of Charge completed'. This, instead, is an A-R-C-Break F/N
(which occurs when one disconnects from a part of life).

[Your mentally] 'running away' as the "result" for the Session, is
not the E.P. [the End Phenomenon, Good Result] of the Process [of
the Questions used in the Session]. Your "I found an explanation
[for my condition]" is NOT the E.P. [not a Good Result].

[Solo-Auditor:] Assessment of the A-R-C-Break [about the false
'Serenity'-doctrine that] 'Disagreement does not [would not] bring
about survival':

[Jutta:] "I was recently, when I did this with a Suppressive Person
[whom I met and whom I did decide NOT to disagree with]:

Was it a Break in my Affinity? sF IND[icated to myself] Reality? sF
IND Communication? F IND Understanding? LF IND

It was inhibited Understanding sF IND enforced Affinity sF IND LFBD
enforced Reality sF IND enforced Communication sF IND

[Koos:] The A-R-C-Break [upset] is "running away from the Session
with the excuse of having a Cognition [a realization]."

[Jutta:] Was it a Break in my Affinity? sF IND Reality? sF IND
Communication? F IND Understanding? sF F LFBD IND

It was inhibited Understanding F IND

[Jutta:] "Inhibited Understanding of the Item 'To run away' [to run
away into a fixed coward-state of L. Ron Hubbard's 'Serenity']."

It was refused Affinity F IND

[Jutta:] "Refused Affinity for the Item." [Refusing to stay with the
subject and look at it. (Note by Koos)]

It was no Reality sF IND

[Jutta:] "No Reality about the Item."

It was refused Communication F IND

[Jutta:] "Refused Communication with the Item." LFBD

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "For my refusing to contribute to life.

"For my HAVING run away many times from Koos, this lifetime. [I just
do it again - that shows how right the earlier times were!]

"For having destroyed myself-as-a-spirit, in 1788 [at my retirement
in my lifetime as Benjamin Franklin]. LFBDBD

"It makes me right for REFUSING TO KNOW ABOUT THE PROBLEMS OTHERS
HAVE REGARDING SURVIVING. LFBD

"It makes me right for refusing to duplicate their Reality.

"It makes me right for refusing to help them when they have adopted
evil [destructive of life] intentions LFBD as [fixed, safe]
solutions to survival. F's

"It [running away from life] would make me right LFBD for wanting to
destroy people by LEAVING them in the grip [compulsion] of their
evil intentions." F's

[Note by Koos: This is very basically the evil compulsion of Jutta:
To destroy others by keeping them destroying each other's awareness,
decency and aliveness, and pushing them into it further.

This is due to her entirely false concept of 'being good'. She wants
to make herself believe and others want to make her believe, that
the more evil others are, the better she is by comparison. That's
why she WANTS to let others be evil to each other!

I told you the definition of 'being good': It is creating survival.

Nothing whatsoever to do with how good or evil others are, or how
good or evil one was in the past. Nothing to do with it at all!

This is a very strong evil intention of Jutta, as described in the
Resolving Domination Series (RDS-series) with her session of 12
August 1997, 07:17 GMT, in which she describes how she treats a
criminal.]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "It would make me right for deserting my friend, Koos, and
it would make me right for continuing to destroy what Koos had built up.

"It would make me right [for] having ruined Koos' credit standing
while I was Blown [had run away irresponsibly], and Koos found me
only a few months later [in Trier, Germany, showing my paintings in
the street, being 'on the run', hiding from life, destroying life]."

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "For REFUSING to confront what IS there.

"'I don't HAVE to face it, I just can go somewhere else where the
conditions are different.'

"(I did this when I refused to confront the evil intentions of (a
person next to whom we were living).)" LFBD

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "I am duplicating LFBD Koos' stability with which he
confronts what is there. LFBD

"I am duplicating how Koos makes it possible for Noel and Freya to
be here. LFBD

"I [faintly] am contributing to Koos now: By [faintly] having my own
viewpoint about Koos and about Koos' survival intentions, by
[faintly] seeing Koos' good intentions, by [faintly] disagreeing
with those who want to destroy Koos and who want to kick him out. F LFBD

"I [faintly] disagree with Koos' father LFBDBD and I [faintly]
disagree WITH MYSELF [with my own intentions to destroy Koos'
viewpoint], that's why I CONTINUE the Session [now, instead of
ending it by mentally 'running away']."

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "For refusing to ADMIT that I do NOT WANT to create any
future - for Koos, for Freya, for Noel, for myself." LF

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right? LFBD

[Jutta:] "For REFUSING to let another look at me and at my evil
intentions.

"For wanting to survive without me looking at another's evil intentions.

"'When I have run away, I can create myself as I want, LFBD give
myself any [false] image I want'."

[Note by Koos: Criminals do all these things, All criminals are
cowards. L. Ron Hubbard does precisely and exactly the same - with
precisely the same intentions.]

All criminals are also psychopaths and vicious liars, who in order
to create themselves with an image of 'being good, great,
responsible, etc.', destroy, without any conscience whatsoever, the
truth about people who ACTUALLY are being good, great and
responsible.] (see also RI-980i 'Character of any heavy Suppressive
- Jutta...' http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-980i.htm)

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "'When I am [running away to] somewhere WHERE NOBODY KNOWS
ME [hiding from friends and acquaintances], it is an attempt [to
DENY my crimes against life, which is also, technically, called:] to
'Not-Is' my 'Overts' [my Anti-Survival Acts].'

"I RUN AWAY from myself: I have created financial problems of
magnitude [large in size]. To RUN AWAY from looking at the
conditions now, is supposed to make me right: 'I never wanted to
have financial problems.'

"So I am [actually] very wrong now and not right at all, as I HAVE
financial problems. LFBD

"IT IS CRAZY WHAT I AM DOING.

"I just could, and do now to some extent, 'settle down' and NOT 'run
away' but LOOK at the financial conditions.

"The financial conditions ARE there.

"Running away doesn't change [anything even] a [little] bit, but
makes it worse, and leaves all the problems to Koos, LF dumps all on
him."

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right? LF

[Jutta:] "The thought 'I have no right to be here [with Koos]
because I have been so evil!' is a JUSTIFICATION for running away,
LFBD and doesn't contribute the least bit to repairing anything.

[Note by Koos: Again, the definition of 'being good' IS to create
survival. So one INSTANTLY can 'be good', regardless of how evil one
has been earlier.]

[Jutta:] "[I better say] 'I have created a lot of havoc, I am here
now to repair what I have done!' - THAT is helping.

"Running away doesn't help, I HAVE done what I have done. LFBD

"I do not want to make it less now by discussing that 'I never
wanted to' - because WHEN I DID IT, I DID WANT TO [be evil and
destructive]."

[Note by Koos: Please, all psychologists and criminologists, hear!]

[Koos to Jutta:] The truth is [also] that you have done some repair,
something good, and THEN you say "you have the RIGHT to run away."
After a sale when the conditions are good and things are going fine
and are affluent and we are enjoying life, you say [think secretly
and act out]: "I have been good, now I have the RIGHT to run away."

[Note by Koos: Again due to her false definition of 'being good'.

A good part of Jutta's black magic 'zapping' consists of enforcing
on others pictures and feelings of times she WAS good, in order that
they do NOT see that NOW she is entirely destructive and entirely
evil and insane to them.

And she runs and stays away to leave you with the memory of her
'being good', while she is NOW doing nothing but 'zapping' you, and
others, and herself into unawareness and false awareness and into
stopping others' and her own aliveness.
L. Ron Hubbard does precisely the same, even with huge PR-campaigns.]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Now, below, we get some right answers! (Note by Koos)]

[Jutta:]
"It DOESN'T make me right for not caring for Koos and Freya and Noel!

"If I run away, AS I run away - because that's what I am doing - I
try to 'Not-Is' [deny] LFBD that I DO want to have money. LFBD

"I make MYSELF dull and dumb and half unconscious in order NOT to
admit to myself that I DO want to have money. LF

"I try to 'Not-Is' [DENY] that I HAVE a thirst for life: LF - that I
DO want friends visiting us, - that I DO want to travel with Koos
and Freya and Noel, - that I DO want to have possessions, - that I
DO want to have a beautiful house, LFBD - that I DO want to buy
things for Koos and Freya and Noel.
"I am doing something very insane with my desire to have [things in
life]: I destroyed my desire to have [things in life], in 1788 [at
my retirement during my lifetime as Benjamin Franklin].

"And in 1810 [during my lifetime as Marie Louise of Austria when I
married Napoleon]: 'I shouldn't have anything [that] I MYSELF want
to have, I should be satisfied [with] what I get (what I am given by
the Suppressive Person Napoleon Bonaparte)'." LFBD

[Note by Koos: This is Jutta's very, very insane and extremely ugly
game that she mainly has with the being Richard Reiss:

To INTENTIONALLY destroy herself so that she will NOT CARE FOR THE
SANITY OF OTHERS, especially not of others who would 'NEVER, EVER
DESERVE TO BE HELPED', like Richard Reiss or Napoleon Bonaparte.

Especially not care for the extremely insane, extremely ugly being
Richard Reiss - because she wants rather to PUNISH him for being so
extremely insane and so extremely destructive of others, punish him
by ENCOURAGING HIM TO BE MORE EVIL, instead of stopping his evil,
because that would be helping him, and NOT punishing him.

In order to let HIM destroy her: "He deserves to do it anyway, AND
he does it best! And it punishes HIM at the same time by making HIM
more evil." "So there is no better solution than to ask Richard
Reiss to destroy me. He willingly complies AND it makes him more
insane as well."

Do you get the idea, now, of this kind of punishment that ONLY
creates more and more and more evil?

This idea is also propagated by L. Ron Hubbard who classifies people
in those who 'deserve to be helped' and those who 'do not deserve to
be helped'. He does not even know what help IS. And he also promotes
the idea that 'life is a game of overwhelming'! Really! (see RI-732i
'The Evil in Hubbard's Scientology Philosophy' 10 Nov 96
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-732i.htm)

YOU HAVE TO RISE ABOVE THE IDEA OF 'NOT DESERVING' AND OF
'PUNISHMENT', AND GET USED TO THE IDEA, IN ALL SITUATIONS, THAT
'GOOD' IS CREATING SURVIVAL AND THAT DESTROYING SURVIVAL IS EVIL.

On top of this, Jutta ALSO has the game of 'being entirely without
bother by the being Richard Reiss' - NOT by helping him to stop, BUT
by destroying him till utter extinction - which cannot happen to a
spirit - AND by making herself so completely unaware and extinct
that she cannot notice Richard Reiss.

And that's what she did then, in 1790 in the Implant station:
WANTING TO BE HELPED TO DECIDE, WANTING TO HAVE A 'GOOD REASON GIVEN
TO HER' TO MAKE HERSELF ENTIRELY UNAWARE 'FOREVER'.

You see, she could blame the Implanters and their machines for that:
"It wasn't her own decision, she could and did loudly claim, now:
She was forced 'by them' to incapacitate herself."

("THEY ruined her capability to help others, her care for Mankind."
Jutta kept up this lie till this summer, when she started to admit
that two years before her death, in 1788, she HAD already decided to
not care for people anymore.) (see RI-941i 'Benjamin Franklin's
fatal decision of 1788' 24 Oct97
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-941i.htm)

Jutta's "forever"-decisions nowadays don't take longer than a few
months, or sometimes a few weeks.

Then, in 1790, she appeared again shortly afterwards on Earth,
smelling the grass, 'not knowing' anything of her past or of her
decisions. And shortly thereafter the crying of baby Marie-Louise of
Austria was heard - NOT far away from Metternich, who is now the
being Richard Reiss.

And indeed, she AGAIN REFUSED to say "No!" to his evil and
degrading, most significantly when he demanded that she marry the
most vicious, evil, ugly and destructive Napoleon Bonaparte, the
only one Marie-Louise NEVER would want to have as a husband.

But RICHARD REISS DID NOT "DESERVE" TO BE STOPPED BY HER, DID NOT
"DESERVE" TO BE MADE LESS EVIL BY HER.

Do you understand the idea now, of 'not deserving', of 'punishing',
and what consequences it has in REAL life?

Because Metternich was "too evil and too ugly to deserve to be
stopped in his evil", Marie-Louise made herself ugly, indecent and
entirely without responsibility for the evil of Napoleon which she
very well saw, and made herself 'enjoy' sex with him. And in the
process, she let her only son with Napoleon destroy himself. (see
RI-559Ri 'Napoleon and Metternich - Two Suppressives' 11 May96
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-559ri.htm)

These are the real facts of life, things that are being done ALL THE
TIME by many people.]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "'Right' for not owning anything LFBD [with a very real,
strong intention to deny herself and others any possessions or joy
of them. (Note by Koos)]

"For destroying even what I got by heritage [inheritance] (two
pieces of land, which altogether were worth one million Deutsch Mark
[US $600K]).

"But I could NOT even 'have' [take responsibility for owning and
caring for] that potential possession: I [really, intentionally,
evilly] REFUSED to turn it wisely into something survival for my
family and for our activity." LFBD

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "It would make me right for having NOTHING: LF I
[intentionally] have nothing. I [intentionally] own practically
nothing: A few clothes, crayons - my paintings belong to Koos.

[Jutta ran away, on 17 October, in the clothes and jacket of her
daughter, and without a purse, without money, without a watch,
without anything. And so she must have decided to 'be the great
dominating tyrant' and stole a wallet of someone and got out of town
and kept hiding from everyone. Very, very ugly. Intentionally
criminal, intentionally unaware of her decent impulses.]

[Jutta:] "And why is all that [having nothing]? I REFUSE to be
responsible for the house and for what's in it, so I say 'I don't
own it'. I REFUSE to be responsible for Koos' work, so I say 'I
don't own the computers and the telephones'. LFBD

"I would own two cars - which need repair and a new one needs to be
bought - I would own them, IF I said I want to be responsible for it.

"BUT I - WANT TO - RUN AWAY.

[Note by Koos: That is, she wants to enforce how right it is NOT TO
HELP PEOPLE "because they should HAVE no problems." They should
create life FOR her, so she can be a dominating tyrant and feel
"great."]

[Jutta:] "What IS needed [for survival, for having possessions]?

"Finding people in the society who like to buy my paintings!

"That would reduce my problems to zero!" LFBDBD

[Note by Koos: That's of course a total nonsense-statement from
Jutta. She intentionally refuses to go to people who do, very much,
like to buy her paintings - IN ORDER THAT SHE WILL NOT HAVE MONEY OR
POSSESSIONS, and in order not to look at her own evil, and because
she does NOT WANT to help people, and she says "People don't buy art."]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "With my running away, I ACCUSE others of wanting to have
beautiful things, wanting to have practical things, wanting to have
things in working order, wanting to buy new things and pay old
bills, wanting to enjoy life, wanting to meet other people, wanting
to work with excellent equipment.

"I make Koos, Freya and Noel WRONG for wanting to have things which
I COMPULSIVELY deny myself." LFBDBD

[Note by Koos: A few hours before she ran away (again) on 17 October
1997, I was in another town buying myself some loudspeakers. Jutta
gave me a JOLT of spiritual energy, thrown at me by her, of how
"evil" I was for enjoying to have some proper loudspeakers for my
music. I phoned her on my son's cellular phone - he was with her in
town - that she was being pushed down by Richard Reiss, and that she
better keep her own viewpoint.

But she had ALREADY - secretly, of course, that's how tremendously a
big coward she is - decided to "live", to run away, to hide, to 'be
with Richard Reiss', to forget all her decency, to steal someone's
wallet so she could buy a train ticket, and to be 'great' and
'destroy all signs of' her family and friends by staying away from
them totally, and now 'having things' ONLY by being criminal.

This lasted one and a half month, and then she settled down into
ugly, apathetic cowardice and still a lot of spiritual 'zapping' at
us for us still existing and thereby reminding her how criminal and
insane she wants to be and is now, and for us continuing to look at
her and find out the real truth about her insanity so as to make it
vanish.]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make others wrong?

[Jutta:] "It would make Koos wrong for confronting the evil
intentions of others: Those of his father, those of his mother,
those of the rest of his family - where most of the members of Koos'
family agree NOT to see it and to run away from [looking at] it, and
call it [this refusal to look at each other] 'being friends to each
other'. So they are ruining each other [by not helping each other
and by pretending that evil is not evil]."

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "For using my [mental, spiritual] force FOR RUNNING AWAY.

"For using my spiritual force [to make others UNAWARE], to escape
[from facing life] AND to help others escape [from facing life, as
well]." LFBD

[Instead of - exactly same action, generating spiritual force, but -
directed to make them AWARE!]

[Solo-Auditor:] How would "me running away" make you right?

[Jutta:] "If I am running away, I could PRETEND to myself that 'I
HAVE good intentions towards our survival, only "I can't execute
them" because the counter-force [of others against me] is too strong'.

[Note by Koos: While in fact she gets tremendous, tremendous
SUPPORT, not counter-force, but SUPPORT almost 24 hours a day, from
her husband AND children, who create almost all life, and things to
work with, and keep it in order, and handle the havoc she
continuously creates by herself, FOR HER. It is NOT counter-force of
others, at all!

It is solely and only her OWN intention: Very forcefully to destroy
and oppose life, including her own life, by creating spiritual
energy to KEEP OR BASH AWARENESS DOWN, to KEEP OR BASH DOWN
INTENTIONS TO BE ALIVE AND ENJOY LIFE. In us, in others, in herself.
Very, very insane, very, very psychopathic, (as does Richard Reiss,
as well, to himself and to others).

SHE creates tremendous counter-force, and WE are, indeed, subjected
to it.

(We will see her hidden, very ugly, unbelievably insane game
underlying it, in the next RI-Bulletin.)

But, criminal as she is, she would and does not refrain from blaming
us and others for 'causing her counter-intention', for 'us not
caring ENOUGH for her'. She terrorizes us and our lives almost 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, but we 'did not help her enough to face
Richard Reiss' and we were so evil to her as to not prevent her from
running away - when SHE forced her son not to look at her for two
minutes. How evil of us!]

[Jutta:] "But if I AM facing counter-force [of suppressive
intentions], I might sometimes be successful in changing something
for the better, sometimes I might mess it up by my own evil intentions.

"To run away AFTER I had done something good, LFBDBD SHOULD prevent
me LFBDBD from messing things up again. LFBD

"[But] that never worked."

LFBD-F/Nind [=3D a truth established]

'Jutta Nolst Trenite'

Total session time: 4 hrs 38 min

As Jutta wrote, her "I do not want to mess things up again" is her
JUSTIFICATION for running away, to make it SEEM somewhat 'righter'
to be evil and destructive and to be a complete coward who does not
dare to face her own evil.

The truth is that she simply wants to be evil, criminal, destructive
to herself and others, and leave the impression with others of how
good she WAS.

It has all nothing whatsoever to do with BEING good or BEING bad,
but only with what good opinion she can manage to 'black magic' onto
others, and onto herself.

NO INTEREST TO ACTUALLY MAKE THINGS GOOD AND KEEP THEM RUNNING WELL.
It is all a personal game of others or herself 'having a good
opinion of her'.

And that's her only, but extremely false definition of 'being good'
that she wants to work with.

Note that L. Ron Hubbard did precisely and exactly the same, first
after he had achieved his goal of Clearing, in 1965, then in 1982,
and then, by suicide, in 1986. (see also RI-288i 'The Main Evil
Purpose' of 15 Oct 1995
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-288i.htm)

The "reasons" and motives and justifications of L. Ron Hubbard are
precisely and exactly the same as those of Jutta.

Both have false definitions of 'being good' and 'being evil'.

Both solve it by driving themselves into UNAWARENESS AND COWARDICE,
and calling that 'being better than others' or 'being above life',
in order to have a good opinion of themselves. And they demand of
others to also see it that way.

I never did, and I never will. That's why I am me, always was me,
and always will be me.

Motto of the 'Resolving Domination Series' (RDS):

"Koos is giving much more life than all other beings I know. I want
to be in communication with Koos."

(Jutta's own viewpoint in 1977 for joining Koos)

Footnote:
See the 'Understanding Suppression Series', at
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm

* (see RI-541i 'Correct and Joyful Confessional Procedure - I' 20
Apr 199=
6
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-541i.htm
and following parts II, III, IV)

** [Definition of 'Solo-Auditor':
Someone who writes down his own confession
in response to given questions,
with the purpose to release emotional charge and aberrations.=
]

*** (The abbreviations sF(small Fall), F(Fall), LF(Long Fall), LFBD(Long
Fall Blow Down) and F/N(Floating Needle) describe reactions on the
E-meter, indicating mental charge (sF, F, LF, LFBD), and release of
charge completed (F/N).
"LFBD-F/N" =3D truth found out. "ind" =3D indicated to the person.)

(see RI-610i 'Understanding the E-meter, correctly' of 26 June 1996
RI-648i 'Simplicity of E-meter use, by UNDERSTANDING it' 1 Aug 9=
6
RI-687i 'Notes on E-meter use and Solo-Auditing' of 4 Sept 1996
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/ri-687i.htm)

Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind

Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite

Editors: Freya Nolst Trenite and Blair Wiley
Final Editor: Koos Nolst Trenite
Supervision and publication requested by Jutta Nolst Trenite
Actions and Publication ordered by Ambassador for Mankind

Personal Web-page:
http://ArtOrg.com

Personal Web-Library:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/

Library Search Engine:
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/search.html

References (available also at the Library "http://Art-Org.com/"):

- About Sanity, Care, Understanding and Responsibility

RI-449i 'A Rule For Freedom' of 14 Jan 1996
RI-714i 'State of Sanity, Definition of' of 24 Oct 1996
RI-537i 'The Right to Demand Awareness' of 15 Apr 1996

RI-929i 'Simple Detection: "Sane or Insane?"' of 11 Sept 1997
RI-962i 'The Master Path to Life - Platonism understood' of 1 Nov 97

RI-974i 'Truth about "Not putting attention on evil of others"' 27 Nov=
97
RI-908i 'The Ostrich-factor - on facing evil or criminality' 16 Jul 97

RI-781BPI 'Raising Children - or Keeping Them Small?' of 16 Jan 1997
RI-631i 'Definition of "Woman"' of 12 July 1996

RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996

- About Richard Reiss

RI-900i 'The Spiritual Killer Reiss (FLAG - "Church of Scientology")'
RI-890i 'Flag's Richard Reiss - Why to remove him' of 4 Aug 96
RI-891i 'Flag's Richard Reiss - his intention to hide from Koos' 11 Au=
g 96

RI-892i 'Flag's Reiss - million times worse than Adolf Hitler' 19 June=
97
RI-893i 'FLAG's Reiss - How he dominated a planetary population' 20 Ju=
ne 97

RI-889i 'Richard Reiss is "Safe" at Flag (in Florida)' of 17 June 1997
RI-889i-A 'More Black Scientology of Richard Reiss' of 18 June 1997

RI-746i 'Biggest Present Enemy of Mankind - Richard Reiss' of 26 Nov 9=
6
RI-745i 'FLAG and Richard Reiss equals Black Scientology' of 14 Sept 9=
6

RI-792i 'Destroying destroyer Reiss of Flag is MORE destruction' 16 Fe=
b 97
RI-780i 'Removing FLAG's Richard Reiss the wrong way' of 12 Jan 1997

RI-761i 'Slaves of FLAG's Richard Reiss - VERY IMPORTANT' of 26 Nov 19=
96
RI-757i 'Making a violent psychotic saner' of 11 Dec 1996
RI-754i 'Bitter truth about L. Ron Hubbard and Richard Reiss' 4 Dec 96

(and many more)

- About Benjamin Franklin

RI-941i 'Benjamin Franklin's fatal decision of 1788' of 24 Oct 1997
RI-133i 'Benjamin Franklin's right to NOT be' of 31 Mar 1995

RI-647i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part I' of 30 July =
1996
RI-656i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part II' of 30 July=
96
RI-674i 'Benjamin Franklin returning from France - Part III' of 30 Jul=
y 96

- About Jutta

RI-983i 'Jutta Blackmailed for Eternity by Reiss, Also on Christmas?'
RI-982Pi 'Wanting To Be Punished In Order Not To Face Own Acts (Jutta)'
RI-981i 'Jutta RUNNING AWAY - from facing Reiss driving her insane'
RI-980i 'Character of any heavy Suppressive Person - Jutta seen by Fre=
ya'

RI-979i 'Deserting Their Own Hero - Why (Jutta, Michael Jackson, etc.)=
Do'
RI-978i 'The Wall of Shame - Remedy of Hell, Jutta, Socrates, Black Ma=
gic'
RI-976Di 'Psychose - am Beispiel der Malerin Jutta - ins Auge gefasst'

RI-972i 'Jutta: "How I want to destroy LIFE, since 1788"' of 4 Sept 19=
97
RI-972Si 'Hidden but Executed Intentions of the paintress Jutta' 23 Nov=
97
RI-969i 'Jutta: "See me Great, or I kill you" - The main evil' 3 Sept =
97

RI-967i 'Jutta: "Communicating with Koos is knowing myself"' of 26 Aug=
97
RI-966i 'Jutta: "Being Unaware is NOT 'Keeping my Viewpoint Clean'"'
RI-964i 'Jutta: With Koos, care for people - Without Koos, dominating.=
..'

RI-961i 'Jutta: "I am praised for helping Mankind, but now destroying =
it"'
RI-960i 'Jutta: Why I destroyed Koos' Castle Project (1980) - Dominati=
on'
RI-959i 'Jutta: "I just don't WANT to handle L. Ron Hubbard's insanity=
"'

(and more)

- About RI-Bulletins

RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996

These references and other RI-Bulletins can be obtained

at the Library of Koos' writings on
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
http://AmbassadorForMankind.org/ri-bulletins/telepathy.htm

or at the Archives at
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI
ftp://thetics.europa.com/outgoing/adams/RI/USP

[Leonardo Been]

Studying Sociopaths here: Falsely Titling to aid Criminal Libel
- Violation of Copyright in order to pervert and corrupt original,
VITAL data
- Adds Evidence and Motive to their Severe Criminal Libel
- recorded for legal process

'

On Tue, 21 May 2013 15:08:36 -0400, John Dorsay wrote:

> Cancel-Lock: sha1:ankg+/61Hs7Jr+kN/jIYsx9/9WA=
> Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 15:08:36 -0400
> From: John Dorsay <restim...@gmail.com>
> Injection-Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 19:04:25 +0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: arscc.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9fb020521ef9f0692ad0a93922379503"; logging-data="3325"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+wJzTXFUExgTHQIIE783DL"
> Lines: 1142
> Message-ID: <knggfo$37t$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org>
> Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
> Organization: Arscc Canada, Southwestern Ontario Division
> Path: news.kpn.nl!spool-B-59.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder-2.ams.xsnews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-2.de.xennanews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!arscc.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
> Reply-To: restim...@gmail.com
> Subject: Koos "telepathically audits" Jutta, mother of his three children
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5
> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
> Xref: news.kpn.nl alt.religion.scientology:116863
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

[rogergonnet]

Wow, did you read the insanities? Wow, it needs a lot of persistence.

How come he does not audit telepathetically the daughter he killed himself?

r


"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> a �crit dans le message de news:
knggfo$37t$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...

[Leonardo Been]

Severely Criminal Libelers project THEIR OWN NATURE and past...
'Rancor non compos mentis'

{note 20130520-A}
(Addition on
22 May 2013)

'

Severely Criminal Libelers project THEIR OWN NATURE - as they no doubt
DO remember their "Holocaust-denier"-past...

...else there would be no point in their DENYING any PAST as
vehemently as they do so Criminally DENY and Libel the true past of the
very decent and very caring and very ethical.

'

The Criminal Libelers are merely projecting THEIR OWN NATURE, they
"must be talking about themselves," what THEY would have done - and no
doubt did as present life "Holocaust-deniers," in their "non- existent"
past:

Their condition, they have ALREADY made THAT obvious, that one wonders,
why they keep on "fighting tooth and claw" and with all Criminal Energy
they can muster,

to "defend themselves" from the most decent and the most caring.

'

What is written below, of course also applies to them, who are more
obvious and less "well-adjusted" Sociopaths:

Again: the more obvious ones, do shine their soul's condition, by means
of the libel that really reflects ONLY

- seeing also their detailed and motivated murder threats
that they posted -

their own murderous and irreparable mental illness of

'Rancor non compos mentis.'


'

'

I wrote earlier:

'

Naturally, the more "Well-Adjusted" Sociopaths are ALSO blocking to
actually look at l. ron hubbard

{note 20130520}

(layout in
monofont,
including
'white space')

'

l. ron hubbard - like all Sociopaths* - is TERRIFIED of being actually
looked at as he is.

And all Sociopaths, also the more "Well-Adjusted" Sociopaths
- naturally, by their nature - are blocking others and themselves from
looking at l. ron hubbard.

'

Such more "Well-Adjusted" Sociopaths, include, for instance:

Mark Bunker,
Andreas Heldal-Lundt,
Toni Ortega,
Tori Christman,
Jon Atack,
Arnie Lerma,
etc., etc.

as is very obvious from their actions and public statements already, and
even more obvious, from what they do NOT act upon and do NOT publicly
state at all, DESPITE their stated "purposes."

'

Those could be counted amongst Well-Adjusted" Sociopaths,

who all are characterized most easily by what of Life they do NOT
support, by what they to NOT protect, by what Crimes they REFUSE to
expose and oppose.

'

They REFUSE to accept people as they are, and they HEAVILY DENY the
nature of people: (They forcefully violate ARTICLE ONE of the Natural
Human Rights Declaration - [HRD-01].)

'

They - deliberately, actively, intentionally - refuse to understand
people, they refuse to understand the intentions of people, they refuse
to understand the activities of people.

Their most famous example and idol, is the public Sociopath and
charlatan and fraud called James Randi, the 'Anti-"scientist";'

or "skeptic" as he calls himself, without ever being skeptic of himself
- and Sociopaths can of course not afford that, at all.

Instead, they create and promote a FALSE "understanding" of people,
and of themselves;

and they bring about - or forcefully try to bring about - a FALSE
"understanding" and statement of the intentions of people, and of their
own intentions;

and they bring about - or forcefully try to bring about - a FALSE
"understanding" of the activities of people, and of their own activities
as well.

'

This they have in common with ALL Sociopaths - which does include
l. ron hubbard, who does THE SAME.

Like l. ron hubbard too, the "Well-Adjusted" Sociopaths do create and
maintain and promote an elaborate system of FALSE "understanding" of
people's nature, and of people's intentions and people's activities - and
they maintain and promote a false "understanding" of their OWN nature,
their OWN intentions, and their OWN activities,

by which they REPLACE reality. [CSTC]

'

They have everything IN REVERSE, and they want everything - and most
of all everyone - seen as THE REVERSE of what they actually are:

"THEY are the good ones," or at least the ones "who do face and
handle life."

On the other hand, actually decent and caring and truthful people

- so Sociopaths do experience it,

even if they, being "Well-Adjusted," do not dare to express it publicly,
for fear of damaging their image, nevertheless,

what they do feel (with tremendous Hate and Envy) about the most
decent, the most caring and the most truthful -

about those, the Sociopaths feel or "know," that such "boastful
individuals, 'pretending to be good and able'"

"are in fact the most evil individuals, are pretentious show-offs, who
must be 'cut down to size' and who should, if possible, really be gotten
rid of or exterminated forever."

As you can in read your history books, or in the public rhetoric of
Venezuela's Chavez' or Russia's Putin.

Or in this particular case, their intentions towards decent people, have
been recorded in the Usenet archives of
groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology

'

Wholly their opposite, I do remain, etc., etc.,

KNT hrp&p

'

________
Footnote:

(*) See the Selected References, below.

___________________
Selected References:

Take your pick from these twenty chapters - they can be read separately.
It is far more compelling reading, than fiction.

But exactly that, that it IS REAL LIFE - makes it loathed by Sociopaths,
also loathed by the "Well-Adjusted" Sociopaths,

who want people, and real life (and thus also the HRI's), to be ridiculed
and stamped on, or "not existing."

'

I did and do look at Sociopaths, and I wrote and published also the
following series about them, which is obligatory educational material for
studying Human Rights:

'

'
_________________________________________________ The '"Insane" "Defined"
By Criminal Minds' series:


'

[IDBCM-p20] ' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Twenty:
(Conclusion)
"Others destroying people, is 'none of your business' " ' {HRI
20040422-V2.7.1-pi20-V1.0.1} [IDBCM-p20]
(28 February 2008 - Version 1.0.1 on 28 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/9c07433a14f01422

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Nineteen: 'There IS NO
"reason" behind or for Evil' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi19-V1.1}
(27 February 2008 - Version 1.1 on 28 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/02135213792e0215

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Eighteen: 'Criminal Minds
"are clever" - and normal people "are just stupid" ' ' {HRI
20040422-V2.7.1-pi18-V1.2}
(26 February 2008 - Version 1.2 on 27 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/02c9bba9ec172029

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Seventeen: 'Criminal Minds
suck your vital Energies away from you,
to destroy your awareness and abilities' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi17-V1.1}
(25 February 2008 - Version 1.1 on 25 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/2a05b497a74a411b

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Sixteen: 'Criminal Minds
inflict Harmful Energies into your body, to make
it sick' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi16-V1.1}
(14 February 2008 - Version 1.1 on 14 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/2923afcc1235acc4

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Fifteen: 'How they teach an
Illusion, instead of LIFE' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi15-V1.0.1}
(13 February 2008 - Version 1.0.1 on 13 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/cb7e39017101f204

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Fourteen: ' "Peace" is "DO
NOT SEE Criminal Minds" ' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi14-V1.0.1}
(12 February 2008 - Version 1.0.1 on 12 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/42265f097935edb7

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Thirteen: 'Using what THEY
consider "insane," in order to detect them' ' {HRI
20040422-V2.7.1-pi13-V2.1}
(8 February 2008 - Version 2.1 on 11 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/0dc9b542bc42ab57

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Twelve: 'Criminal Minds
PROJECT unreality as "reality" ' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi12-V1.1.1}
(6 February 2008 - Version 1.1.1 on 7 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/01a66139883eae1a

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Eleven: 'Respecting any
person, with correct definition of respect' ' {HRI
20040422-V2.7.1-pi11-V1.2}
(5 February 2008 - Version 1.2 on 6 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/nl.politiek/msg/9a1663a7c714c583
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/1a5fbbd04d09f1f0

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Ten: 'Seeing Criminal Minds
"Is An Illusion" ' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi10-V1.1}
(4 February 2008 - Version 1.1 on 4 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/18975308fcb07398

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Nine: 'The Criminal Mind
"who cares so much about you" ' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi09-V1.1}
(1 February 2008 - Version 1.1 on 1 Feb 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/9165383142b6bf39

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Eight: 'Identification:
Friend or Foe, also in Diplomacy' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi08-V1.2}
(30 January 2008 - Version 1.2 on 31 Jan 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/38e269eda74cb380

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Seven: ' "Surviving" by
inventing and promoting any institution, philosophy, religion or science,
that hides Criminal Minds' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi07-V3.0.1}
(15 January 2008 - Version 3.0.1 on 16 Jan 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/d0d68297aa7c7b8c

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Six: 'Blinding others, in
order for themselves to "survive" ' ' {HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi06-V2.3} (10
January 2008 - Version 2.3 on 14 Jan 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/487196131cb8046c

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Five: 'THEY can only
PRETEND to be sane' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi05-V2.2.4}
(20 December 2007 - Version 2.2.4 on 24 Dec 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/57f28a9138e89852

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Four: 'Not facing Criminal
Minds is the CAUSE of Insanity' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi04-V1.0.1}
(19 December 2007 - Version 1.0.1 on 19 Dec 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/1f304ef936494f22

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Three: 'Violently Denying
Correct Perception' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi03-V1.1}
(18 December 2007 - Version 1.1 on 18 Dec 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/us.military.army/msg/b8417eb1e2a7ed39

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part Two: 'Sane is, sensing how
people - their souls - actually are' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi02-V1.1}
(14 December 2007 - Version 1.1 on 17 Dec 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/96f5e029d607a66f

' "Insane" "Defined" By Criminal Minds - Part One: 'NOT seeing them, is
"being sane"' '
{HRI 20040422-V2.7.1-pi01-V1.1}
(14 December 2007 - Version 1.1 on 14 Dec 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/29965cff0dae4a54

'

'

Copyright 2013 by KNT hrp&p - Conditions as usual

On Wed, 22 May 2013 08:51:39 +0200, rogergonnet wrote:

> Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 08:51:39 +0200
> From: "rogergonnet" <roger...@free.fr>
> Lines: 1153
> Message-ID: <519c6af8$0$2541$426a...@news.free.fr>
> NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 May 2013 08:51:37 CEST
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.249.75.216
> Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
> Organization: Guest of ProXad - France
> Path: news.kpn.nl!spool-B-54.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder-2.ams.xsnews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!feeder1-1.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!cleanfeed1-b.proxad.net!nnrp2-1.free.fr!not-for-mail
> References: <knggfo$37t$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org>
> Reply-To: "rogergonnet" <roger...@free.fr>
> Subject: Re: Koos "telepathically audits" Jutta, mother of his three children
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@proxad.net
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
> X-Priority: 3
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
> X-Trace: 1369205497 news-1.free.fr 2541 82.249.75.216:2059
> Xref: news.kpn.nl alt.religion.scientology:116894
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain

>
> Wow, did you read the insanities? Wow, it needs a lot of persistence.
>
> How come he does not audit telepathetically the daughter he killed
> himself?
>
> r
>
>

> "John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:

[John Dorsay]

On 5/22/2013 2:51 AM, rogergonnet wrote:
> Wow, did you read the insanities? Wow, it needs a lot of persistence.
>
> How come he does not audit telepathetically the daughter he killed himself?

He did, Roger, he did. Although he did not provide us with a
transcript of the session, he told us of the Big Win Freya gained as
a result.

Here's what he said about it:

> It looks like I got Freya out of her extreme Hate of Life, that
> she was put into* by her extremely Ugly and Hateful raven-mother
> Jutta Joos and her "friends" Richard Reiss and L. Ron Hubbard by
> which she wanted to and managed to commit suicide, on
> Christmas Day.
>
> That I got her out of her extreme Hate of Life now, apparently
> happened (slightly before 02:30 UTC (GMT) 16 Oct 2002) today as a
> direct result of the Mozart Effect and with the help of Michael who
> connected to that music and to Civilization which it stands for.
>
> Upon his request, I suggested to Michael yesterday, to listen to the
> fragment of Mozart Piano Concerto Eleven - Third Movement, played by
> Derek Han, that is indicated in - 'Mozart - Remembering Heaven Or
> Civilization' (16 Sept 2002)
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=c26a56d.0209160201.65828d6%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain
> and in - 'True Leadership of Johann Sebastian Bach Through His
> Music' (22 Sept 2002)
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3b6f518d.0209220319.55453ee0%40posting.google.com&oe=utf-8&output=gplain
>
> His connecting to Civilization, made it easy enough for me to hold
> a viewpoint on Freya's extreme Hate of Life, and for me to caringly
> confront her with her being in that condition, and to confront her,
> equally caringly, with the fact that I am going to inform everyone
> about it so that they know what and whom she is not standing up to
> but giving in to.
>
> I am talking of course about the person, the soul, of Freya.
>
> And whether she is born again or not yet, is really immaterial.

Isn't that amazing? Koos rescued Freya from her "extreme Hate of
Life". He just needed to kill her before he could caringly confront
her about it. What a father!

The original is here:
https://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/34217f0ff3c1964e?dmode=source&output=gplain

I removed the kook-formatting here:

https://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/cf66c7b48274eaf6?hl=en-GB&dmode=source&output=gplain


John

[rogergonnet]

"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
knijkb$8f8$1...@arscc.eternal-september.org...

yes, the guy is ansolute exemple of a crazy puppet working to become worse
than his own best guru Hubbard!

It's horrible. And when one looks after those having fabricated new
dangerous cults like EST, Avatar or else, or inspired à number of
would-be-new gurus of new cults, one can indeed imagine the crimes against
humanity committed by such a fool egotist.