OCMB "ROC" (or FAQ) is a crock
Nec_V20
E-Mail:
QUOTE
Andreas,
OK you banned ARC_Triangle from OCMB, but with regard to the reason why
I came back under a new nic, what have you done with regard to the
violations of your so exalted "Rules of Conduct" with regard to Terril?
If you take a look at the thread, "Tech outside the CoS" and you want
to uphold what you said on XenuTV when you were in the USA, then excuse
me if I find that there is a slight discrepancy.
If you do not want to redress it, then I can invent a lot of different
personas to hold a mirror up to your statements, until you do.
Terril is an honourable person. We asked him about four years ago to
not post "wins" all over the place, but to confine it to his own
thread(s).
He did and has done so.
Condoning the abuse that Terril has had to endure on "Tech outside the
COS", makes you (with regard to your spouting of the "FAQ") an
hypocrite.
With no regard to you whatsoever
UNQUOTE
Nec_V20
QUOTE
Lord Xenu hopes that you can quit being a whiny douche bag and get on
with
your life.
UNQUOTE
Like most "nobility" and the inbred "quality" of their heritage, you do
have that retarded thirteen-year-old sound to your arguments.
If your conception of yourself is as, "a whiny douche bag", and you
project this onto others, then you really are more to be pitied than
scolded.
Your ego obviously far outstrips your intellectual potential (I would
have said intellectual ability, but obviously you have very little of
that).
Just retreat into your little tin-foil hat, and feel secure in the
fallacies of your own making.
Fred Durks
Nec_V20
It should be:
We can post on and you cannot
Doo Dah Doo Dah
(and repeat)
Shit you need to learn to slag some time along the way sonny-boy.
Ball of Fluff
"Lord Xenu" <xenu.o...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%4%bg.1608$Fc1....@fe07.lga...
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "Nec_V20" <ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1148198929.6...@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> *Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!*
Maybe so, but Nec has a valid point in that the standards on that site are
not equally applied or enforced.
But, as I said before, this kind of thing is subject to interpretation and
subjective impression (as are all things in life) and it's never gonna be
perfect.
C
Ball of Fluff
"Fred Durks" <fred...@stopscientology.com> wrote in message
news:1148275807....@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> Nec- we can post on OCMB and you can't lallalalalalalala
Oh, ouch.
I think Nec must be feeling a little prick there.
A ~very~ little prick...
C
Nec_V20
QUOTE
Maybe so, but Nec has a valid point in that the standards on that site
are not equally applied or enforced.
UNQUOTE
You are not seeing the larger picture here (and "Lord Xenu" most
certainly is not).
If you look into my past posts on OCMB (well over 2000 of them) then
you will see that any time the banning of a poster has come up, I have
completely opposed it.
As I argued then and have continued to argue, it is a slippery slope,
and once the precedent has been set, then you will get the next poster
trying to shift the goalposts to an even more trivial reason for
banning another poster until the self-immolation of an MB as a viable
vehicle for not only expressing critical opinion, but also as a meeting
place where views can be openly exchanged will have been subverted.
When you start using the same methods as those you oppose, then you
become the same filth, no matter how "high" you ideals or convictions
are, that you are "fighting for the right cause".
You see how "Lord Xenu" tries to use exactly the same tactics of black
PR which he decries in OSA. That makes him the same kind of filth as
OSA. He pulls it out of his ass, and then tries to use a sympathetic
audience to marginalise. The only thing is that I have been playing
this game far too long. By acting like filth "Lord Xenu" and Fred Durks
become filth.
OSA's work does not have to be done on ARS or OCMB, the partisan
posters are creating exactly the same environment of intimidation and
discrimination that enhances and advances the "moral" position of Co$
who can point to ARS and OCMB and beat their chest in faux dismay.
My position has always been that critical debate ends where censorship
begins. Disconnection is the ultimate resort of this censorship and
diminishes those who have not yet been purged in that environment where
they have condoned such censorship.
The question which then has to be asked is, "Who is next?"
Who will be the next person to fall victim to the "Not one of us"
mentality?
Who will be the curator(s) of the gallery (or tribunal) with regard to
determining the legitimacy of "Being one of us"?
When this kind of environment is allowed to flourish then no matter how
high the initial ideals, only filth remains.
realpch
Private message boards are different from usenet. Someone owns the darn
thing and has to put up with the heat. Since you, the user, aren't the
one running it, and having to moderate it, you needn't expect that the
actions taken will conform with how you would prefer things to be.
Peach
--
Extra! Extra! Read All About It!
Save some dough, save some grief:
http://www.xenu.net
http://www.scientology-lies.com
Nec_V20
Any MB is an open MB - that is the nature of the beast.
With regard to a "private MB", well that all depends on how willing one
is to either draw the garrotte around the throat of an individual
poster as the "owner" or how willing that "owner" is to turning a blind
eye when the garrotte is applied.
Andreas tries to uphold the pretence of "open debate" whilst it is
being stifled in his name.
I told Andreas publicly and privately to fuck off on a matter of
principle, which I have documented above. You are correct inasmuch as
you say that it is his ball, and he can go home with it any time he
wants. However if he put the ball into play, then he cannot complain
when the other players kick the ball and it doesn't roll the way he
dictates.
If you know anything about soccer then you will know that there is a
big difference between a "foul" and taking a "dive".
All I would need to do to get back into Andreas's good graces is by
apologising and "realising" my "mistakes". Well that is not going to
happen any time, "real soon now".
Why is that?
Simply because the main accuser, namely Don_Carlo, had to publicly
retract his drivel, before Andreas (having been nudged in the direction
via E-Mail) picked up on an already done and dusted theme.
The rest, as the saying goes, is history.
realpch
>
> Realpch,
>
> Any MB is an open MB - that is the nature of the beast.
I don't follow. You have to register for that board, there's a TOS, and
your participation can be suspended.
> With regard to a "private MB", well that all depends on how willing one
> is to either draw the garrotte around the throat of an individual
> poster as the "owner" or how willing that "owner" is to turning a blind
> eye when the garrotte is applied.
>
> Andreas tries to uphold the pretence of "open debate" whilst it is
> being stifled in his name.
Uh huh. Well, if what I've seen on my few visits over there is par for
the course, and I were the owner, I'd shut the whole thing down. I can't
imagine how irritating it must be to put up that forum, and have people
misbehaving in it. It would be like a rowdy party in your own living
room. I doubt Andreas reads all the posts there. I suspect that he
responds on the basis of the annoying emails he must receive daily about
matters on the board.
> I told Andreas publicly and privately to fuck off on a matter of
> principle, which I have documented above. You are correct inasmuch as
> you say that it is his ball, and he can go home with it any time he
> wants. However if he put the ball into play, then he cannot complain
> when the other players kick the ball and it doesn't roll the way he
> dictates.
Well, as I've pointed out before, that's an excellent way to get your
butt tossed. If you go to a party in someone's home and someone is
behaving like a jerk, is that how you deal with your host when
addressing the problem?
> If you know anything about soccer then you will know that there is a
> big difference between a "foul" and taking a "dive".
>
> All I would need to do to get back into Andreas's good graces is by
> apologising and "realising" my "mistakes". Well that is not going to
> happen any time, "real soon now".
You don't have to "realize your mistakes". Probably all you'd have to do
is to is to apologize for the way you handled it. Or you know, there's
always the classic "vote with your hat" move...put it on and leave. You
could start your own forum.
> Why is that?
>
> Simply because the main accuser, namely Don_Carlo, had to publicly
> retract his drivel, before Andreas (having been nudged in the direction
> via E-Mail) picked up on an already done and dusted theme.
>
> The rest, as the saying goes, is history.
Peach
Nec_V20
that you "don't know" is pretty obvious.
You have never been a NetAdmin, let alone a moderator of a little MB.
You have the, "confidence of ignorance" because you essentially have no
idea of what you are talking about.
When I criticise Andreas, I do so out of personal experience, and when
I say that he is doing a piss-poor job then it is again based on
experience that far exceeds Andreas's limited IT perspective.
Where you make the mistake is that you think that my criticisms are
motivated by the banning of myself as a poster on OCMB.
I stuck it out there for a lot longer than Merlin for example (who I
know personally). Not to betray confidences but Merlin threw his role
as moderator down in disgust. With him gone, OCMB has become a
quagmire.
I know more of the internal workings of OCMB than you can imagine, and
I am also qualified to comment upon the failings within that MB.
So please try to refrain from telling me anything - though I would not
be averse to answering any questions if you asked.
realpch
Uh huh. I see that you don't know how useful it is on usenet to quote
the message you're replying to.
As a matter of fact, I didn't think your criticisms were motivated by
being banned. I'm sure you had lots before that.
Ah, I just can't stop myself: Remember to Floss!
Nec_V20
QUOTE
I see that you don't know how useful it is on usenet to quote
the message you're replying to.
UNQUOTE
That was my bad. I will say though that I thought it was pretty obvious
what I was replying to because it was directly above in the same branch
of the same thread. Having said that however, ok, fair(ish) comment on
your part.
I remember reading an article from Paul Krugman, where he said
something interesting which I think is not only applicable to the
military.
To quote Klugman:
... was subject to what military types call "incestuous amplification"
defined by Jane's Defence Weekly as "a condition in warfare where one
only listens to those who are already in lockstep agreement,
reinforcing set beliefs and creating a situation ripe for
miscalculation"
New York Times (Op-Ed) 03/28/2003
UNQUOTE
This is one of the reasons why I actively seek out people of different
opinions to my own, and discuss not only our differences but perchance
also to find common ground. If you read my past posts (going back over
twenty years or so on varying topics) you will find that I can be
intransigent or even downright abusive, I am however willing to back
off if there is a sign that the other person is reciprocating.
It is also a reason why I post contrary opinions to the "established
wisdom". Not necessarily because I hold those opinions, but because
they should be held up to the light to be examined and lessons, if
possible, learned instead of being shouted down and effectively swept
under the carpet in the name of "incestuous amplification".
Lord Xenu is a prime example of the dangers of the, "not one of us"
paradigm in the quote above.
If I did not have my own reason for being critical of Scientology, then
I do not think that any arguments Lord Xenu or Fred Durks could muster
would ever impress me.
I think that the danger is great that many of the people one would want
to warn of the dangers of Scientology will be alienated because they
will not agree to an undifferentiated and polarised anti-cult cult,
which uses the same methodology of debate (or rather lack thereof) as
the very thing they seek to criticise - namely Scientology.
thorazin...@gmail.com
Nec_V20
QUOTE
Get over it, wierdo. We don't care.
UNQUOTE
This is what you would wish to associate, or be associated with?
realpch
Hey, I didn't write that. What are you telling me? Since you and I are
now writing on the same newsgroup I'm responsible for you're saying too?
realpch
>
> realpch,
>
> QUOTE
> I see that you don't know how useful it is on usenet to quote
> the message you're replying to.
> UNQUOTE
>
> That was my bad. I will say though that I thought it was pretty obvious
> what I was replying to because it was directly above in the same branch
> of the same thread. Having said that however, ok, fair(ish) comment on
> your part.
Yeah. I don't read ars on Google, and I'm reading through Lightlink
which now has a very short retention span, and I read the articles by
date rather than thread, and I mark as "show unread" for my preferences.
> I remember reading an article from Paul Krugman, where he said
> something interesting which I think is not only applicable to the
> military.
>
> To quote Klugman:
>
> ... was subject to what military types call "incestuous amplification"
> defined by Jane's Defence Weekly as "a condition in warfare where one
> only listens to those who are already in lockstep agreement,
> reinforcing set beliefs and creating a situation ripe for
> miscalculation"
>
> New York Times (Op-Ed) 03/28/2003
> UNQUOTE
Ha ha ha.
> This is one of the reasons why I actively seek out people of different
> opinions to my own, and discuss not only our differences but perchance
> also to find common ground. If you read my past posts (going back over
> twenty years or so on varying topics) you will find that I can be
> intransigent or even downright abusive, I am however willing to back
> off if there is a sign that the other person is reciprocating.
>
> It is also a reason why I post contrary opinions to the "established
> wisdom". Not necessarily because I hold those opinions, but because
> they should be held up to the light to be examined and lessons, if
> possible, learned instead of being shouted down and effectively swept
> under the carpet in the name of "incestuous amplification".
> Lord Xenu is a prime example of the dangers of the, "not one of us"
> paradigm in the quote above.
>
> If I did not have my own reason for being critical of Scientology, then
> I do not think that any arguments Lord Xenu or Fred Durks could muster
> would ever impress me.
>
> I think that the danger is great that many of the people one would want
> to warn of the dangers of Scientology will be alienated because they
> will not agree to an undifferentiated and polarised anti-cult cult,
> which uses the same methodology of debate (or rather lack thereof) as
> the very thing they seek to criticise - namely Scientology.
Well, put your mind at ease. I'm always out of step. It's my style.
Nec_V20
Realpch,
As reducto ad adsurdum as it might appear, at least you and I have a
basis for (if not of) contention.
We agree on the rules at least.
The rest is either karma or screwing up big-style.
Or else we could agree - which would stunt your growth and completely
shatter my world view.
OR
We could exchange views with no prerequisites - but no, that's never
going to happen on ARS.
realpch
<snip>
>
> Realpch,
>
> As reducto ad adsurdum as it might appear, at least you and I have a
> basis for (if not of) contention.
>
> We agree on the rules at least.
Refresh my memory, what did we agree on? I have a very fluid notion of conversation.
> The rest is either karma or screwing up big-style.
>
> Or else we could agree - which would stunt your growth and completely
> shatter my world view.
Uh huh? You've moved onto my growth and your world view. How'd we get there?
> OR
>
> We could exchange views with no prerequisites - but no, that's never
> going to happen on ARS.
Prerequisites, huh? Ok, that's nothing I think about. Go ahead and lay
it out for me.
Nec_V20
QUOTE
Prerequisites, huh? Ok, that's nothing I think about. Go ahead and lay
it out for me.
UNQUOTE
That's the thing, with no prerequisites there is nothing to "lay out"
for you.
Fred Durks
drawing of scientology and post it on OCMB. Good times.
Crude Scientology Cartoon contest- If you can draw a stickman, you're
in.
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=18427
---------------------------------------
Myspace.com closing critic sites of Scientology
http://www.scientomogy.com/myspace.php
realpch
Whew! That was a close one. What was I thinking?
Simkatu
> Who will be the next person to fall victim to the "Not one of us"
> mentality?
>
> Who will be the curator(s) of the gallery (or tribunal) with regard to
> determining the legitimacy of "Being one of us"?
>
> When this kind of environment is allowed to flourish then no matter how
> high the initial ideals, only filth remains.
My goodness. All this drama over a message board?
Courage....honor.....puffy chested proclamations.
Wake up!
What specific actions do you want Andreas to take? Please specify the
things you want Andreas to do.
Do you want him to ban people that harass bb?
What will make you happy?
You told me that I spent a lot of time writing without saying much, but
so far you haven't said what your specific demands are.
Would you care to stop all the drama for a while and make a list of
your specific complaints and make a list of proposed solutions?
Like I told you a while ago, the current way in which you are
addressing this problem will prove to be ineffectual and hopefully
you'll figure out a more effective means of communication than your
dramatic whining and complaining. It is just a damn message board and
one that you do not own. Whining that you or someone else is a victim
of poor moderation on a messageboard is pathetic. It isn't honorable
or courageous. And thankfully Terrill himself hasn't taken this whiny
approach.
--
Simkatu
realpch
>
> Nec_V20 wrote:
>
> > Who will be the next person to fall victim to the "Not one of us"
> > mentality?
> >
> > Who will be the curator(s) of the gallery (or tribunal) with regard to
> > determining the legitimacy of "Being one of us"?
> >
> > When this kind of environment is allowed to flourish then no matter how
> > high the initial ideals, only filth remains.
>
> My goodness. All this drama over a message board?
>
> Courage....honor.....puffy chested proclamations.
>
> Wake up!
>
> What specific actions do you want Andreas to take? Please specify the
> things you want Andreas to do.
>
> Do you want him to ban people that harass bb?
>
> What will make you happy?
>
> You told me that I spent a lot of time writing without saying much, but
> so far you haven't said what your specific demands are.
I asked him that awhile back, but it seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle!
> Would you care to stop all the drama for a while and make a list of
> your specific complaints and make a list of proposed solutions?
>
> Like I told you a while ago, the current way in which you are
> addressing this problem will prove to be ineffectual and hopefully
> you'll figure out a more effective means of communication than your
> dramatic whining and complaining. It is just a damn message board and
> one that you do not own. Whining that you or someone else is a victim
> of poor moderation on a messageboard is pathetic. It isn't honorable
> or courageous. And thankfully Terrill himself hasn't taken this whiny
> approach.
>
> --
> Simkatu
I like BB. He's nice.
Nec_V20
you try to survive on the fringe of the ineffectual. You admit your own
uselessness and try to elevate it to a virtue.
If you have no social courage, then I would suggest you get some, and
try to escape from being the maggot on the borders of a postulated
"propriety" you claim to be a champion of.
You have nothing. Terril at least has honour.
Nec_V20
QUOTE
Sort of like Nec's mother's genital herpes.
UNQOTE
My mother died in 1995 - care to take another shot?
Nec_V20
right enough it could be my wife's genital herpes, but she died three
months pregnant on the 23rd of August 1997.
So I don't think that that is going to work either.
Nec_V20
QUOTE
Everyone here (except Nec, because he can't hehehehe) should make a
drawing of scientology and post it on OCMB. Good times.
Crude Scientology Cartoon contest- If you can draw a stickman, you're
in.
UNQUOTE
I cannot draw anything except conclusions about yourself - and they are
not flattering.
Zinj
<snip>
> I asked him that awhile back, but it seems to have gotten lost in the shuffle!
I think I'm beyond caring what his answer might be.
Maybe we could get Teddy to start an online petition to let him back into
OCMB, or get him to join Scientology or something else constructive.
Zinj
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Cult
realpch
He he. Yeah, but remember Teddy was gonna killfile anyone who posted
more than 16 posts a week. I think he's probably got us both killfiled!
: )
Simkatu
Nec_V20 wrote:
> Simkatu,
>
> you try to survive on the fringe of the ineffectual. You admit your own
> uselessness and try to elevate it to a virtue.
What are babbling about?
Just because I can admit that whining about how Andreas runs his
message board on ARS is likely to be a fruitless endeavor doesn't mean
that I "admit my own uselessness". I'm not sure what you are going on
about here with "virtue", but words like honor, courage, and virtue
seem phony and misplaced on an anonymous discussion board on usenet.
> If you have no social courage, then I would suggest you get some, and
> try to escape from being the maggot on the borders of a postulated
> "propriety" you claim to be a champion of.
"Social courage"? You mean like the immense amount of courage it
takes for an anonymous asswipe to post defamatory information on
usenet?
I am so in awe at your virtue, honor, and courage. You are so brave,
NEC. You stand up to fight against the horrible evil of poor
moderation of a message board by sacrificing your anonymous username of
NEC to the slings and arrows of condemnation on ARS. With such
tremendous personal sacrifice as this, I don't know how you can keep
surviving!
Your bravery is outstanding. I am sure if your friends and family
could see you now, they would be arranging for a ticker-tape parade in
your hometown.
> You have nothing. Terril at least has honour.
I'll grant you this, Terril was at least decent enough not to whine
about his treatment on a messageboard. And he told you that he didn't
need you to speak for him or defend him -- so I certainly have some
respect for him. I'm not sure how "honourable" Terril is, because to
me, he (or she) is just a bunch of random letters with no face or
voice. I save words like "virtue", "honor", and "courage" for people
that operate outside the world of messageboards.
"Brave" messageboard posts? -- "Virtuous" acts on a messageboard? --
"Courageous" replies on a messageboard?
You sully the word "honour" when you write about it like you do.
"a postulated propriety that I claim to champion"? I like the
assonance of "postulated propriety" and the rhythm of the words, but
again you write much and say very little. It's all fluff.
You've written many posts but you have said nothing of value. So can
you please concentrate and focus next time and answer these simple
questions:
1) WHAT IS YOUR SPECIFIC PROBLEM WITH HOW ANDREAS RUNS HIS MESSAGE
BOARD ?
2) WHAT ARE YOUR SPECIFIC DEMANDS OF ANDREAS?
3) HOW CAN WE HELP YOU TO RESOLVE YOUR PROBLEMS?
--
Simkatu
Nec_V20
Ach, der getroffene Hund bellt.
I'm sorry Alert you lost any reason to be taken seriously quite a few
posts ago.
When you eventually get that charisma bypass transplant you have been
waiting for then perhaps, but until then you are like balls on the Pope.
Nec_V20
no actually spinal cancer.
I spent all night injecting her with morphine (because she wanted to
die at home - she was stubborn that way) until she died with about a
liter of water in her lungs at around 4 AM.
But thanks for asking, I'm sure she'd appreciate your concern.
You take care now
barbz
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> "Nec_V20" <ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1148709904....@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Was it from the herpes?
>
> Yours in Enturbulating Entheta,
>
> Lord Xenu
> Your Friendly Galactic Overseer
> ===
> http://www.xenu.net
> http://www.whyaretheydead.net
> http://www.lermanet.com
> http://www.torymagoo.org
> http://www.xenutv.com
> ======================
> ¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·-> Lord Xenu © <-·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯
>
>
No! No! You're SUPPOSED to get all apologetic and embarrassed, and say
"Sorry about your mother, dude, I didn't know!"
Geez, Xenu, haven't you read your ARSCCwdne manual on debate yet?
--
--
Barb
Chaplain, ARSCC
xenu...@netscape.net
"Every week, every month, every year, every decade and now
every century, Scientology does weird and stupid things
to damage its own reputation."
-Steve Zadarnowski
"Comparing Scientology to a motorcycle gang is a gross, unpardonable
insult to bikers everywhere. Even at our worst, we are never as bad as
Scientology."
-ex-member, Thunderclouds motorcycle "club"
"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign:
terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business
opportunity.
$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide."
-Chris Leithiser
barbz
Invoking pathos is cheesy. Really, really cheesy way to count coup.
So far, you're not doing real well on ARS.
I like the polysyllabic word tumbler software that lets you spew out
meaningless lines of crap that almost sound like something.
But, Hubbard did it first and better in his seminal work, 'Dianetics.'
Simkatu
You've written much and said little. Your attacks on me and others are
not virtuous, honorable, or courageous.
Would you explain in clear and direct language the answers to these
questions?
1) What is your specific problem with Andreas and how he runs his
messageboard?
2) What are your specific demands of Andreas?
3) How can the readers of ARS help resolve your problems?
--
Simkatu
Zinj
Sim...@gmail.com says...
<snip>
> 3) How can the readers of ARS help resolve your problems?
>
> Simkatu
Probably we should consider a 1,000 mile fence along our border with OCMB,
maybe with motion sensors and dogs.
Don't get me wrong. OCMB has some wonderful people, and, I'm sure we can
afford a liberal visa policy and amnesty for those who show themselves
capable of speaking ARSian without drooling on the thesaurus.
But, contrary to popular rumor, ARS has no shortage of people willing to carp
and whine and just because someone can wield an intellectual leaf-blower with
minimal payoff isn't much of a justification for existence.
Naturally, OCMB has legitimate aspirations to deport some of its own, but
maybe they could just create a 'safe haven' compound internally; maybe assign
fred and nec as 'balanced' moderators who could spend their time deleting
each other's messages.
Zinj
--
Scientology is an 'Applied Religious Philosophy'
It's the 'application' that's objectionable.
Nec_V20
I know this vipers nest pretty well, so no, don't think that I was
surprised at either of your responses.
Unlike both of you, I have never tried to cultivate a lack of
compassion.
Death isn't so cosy when it is up close and personal. When the time
comes for you, I am sure that you will be reminded of your words, and
they will not seem so "smart" or "witty".
Even if no-one else reminds you, you will still remember what you have
said, and you will have that added burden to something, which at that
time, will already be unbearable.
You already take my pity into that future which awaits you.
It's behind me, and if any of you thought that it could be a "button",
then think again.
Nec_V20
you do not know your ARS from your ElRon.
Zinj
ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com says...
> Zinj,
>
> you do not know your ARS from your ElRon.
'Nec', if you disappear in the next 3 minutes, there is a very small group of
people who will either notice or care.
They are those who actually *enjoy* taunting dingleberries like you into
'expressing themselves' more succinctly.
It's a nasty habit, but, at worst it reflects on their taste.
Hopefully you will find a better venue for whining about your dead mother,
wife and your wheelchair, but, I suspect alt.fustule.pompous is already well
served.
Zinj
--
'Think For Yourself!' says Scientology; and then adds: 'Don't forget to
pick up your copy of 'What I Think' from the table by the door, before
you leave.'
barbz
> In article <1148765013.7...@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com says...
>
>>Zinj,
>>
>>you do not know your ARS from your ElRon.
>
>
> 'Nec', if you disappear in the next 3 minutes, there is a very small group of
> people who will either notice or care.
>
> They are those who actually *enjoy* taunting dingleberries like you into
> 'expressing themselves' more succinctly.
>
> It's a nasty habit, but, at worst it reflects on their taste.
>
> Hopefully you will find a better venue for whining about your dead mother,
> wife and your wheelchair, but, I suspect alt.fustule.pompous is already well
> served.
>
> Zinj
Okay, so I have lousy taste in entertainment. Still, it beats being
passively entertained...:P
Alert
first..then I pondered.... Was it because of the 'uber secret
materials' I have recently been 'sharing' with readers of OCMB? Was it
because I have reduced TParks' ability to recruit for the SQUIRRELZONE?
After happening upon ARS and seeing Nec_V20 cry like a baby about how
he WHAH WHAH WAH..Ive decided to come aboard.
YOU Nec are a bitch...in the sense you ARE given purpose by others..you
have nothing to offer than reflection upon your own EGO and self
conglatulatory statements. Putting shite on Andreas has got YOU what
YOU deserve..I have been 'put on notice' by OCMB Admin..and I skate the
THINNEST of ice. You can send as many minnions/alternate usernames as
you like Nec..it wont change the FACT I make you dance like the puppet
you are. I SLAMMED the trolls trying to 'wind me up' and have exposed
THAT fact alone, So you can piss and moan like the big BABY that you
are because someone else has come along and derailed you 'little red
wagon'. Your complaining to people who have NOT ONE IOTA who you are
CRYING LIKE A BABY about. I dont 'usually' read much ARS..due to the
amount of SPAM that this group gets..maybe I'll get a 'reader' to
'filter' out the dribblers..but be sure Nec, I WILL make sure I get to
see that ABSOLUTE SHITE that flows from your mouth.
Do you wear a bib?
P.S. Nec_V20...type my email address in caps, look at it with a
'glance'..then you'll see what I do to those just like YOU
P.P.S How do you know if Nec_V20 farts in the bath? SPERM FLOATS TO THE
SURFACE!
Ball of Fluff
Simkatu wrote:
> Nec_V20 wrote:
>
> > Who will be the next person to fall victim to the "Not one of us"
> > mentality?
> >
> > Who will be the curator(s) of the gallery (or tribunal) with regard to
> > determining the legitimacy of "Being one of us"?
> >
> > When this kind of environment is allowed to flourish then no matter how
> > high the initial ideals, only filth remains.
>
> My goodness. All this drama over a message board?
Why not?
Didn't I see you enter in some "drama" over the Fred Durks thing?
Sometimes people feel passionately about some things.
You know the old saying...walk a mile in his shoes, etc.
C
Ball of Fluff
Oh, gawd, Nec, wrong again.
The transplant needed is a ~sanity~ transplant.
C
Ball of Fluff
Nec_V20 wrote:
> Zinj,
>
> you do not know your ARS from your ElRon.
No shit.
Simkatu
I'm not sane because I find it odd that someone would come here and
whine about a messageboard?
So far NEC has not provided us with answers to these questions:
1. What are the specific complaints against Andreas
2. What specific demands do you make upon Andreas.
3. What can the people of ARS do to help resolve your problem with
Andreas
If you think that what NEC is doing is helping him to win friends and
influence people to take up for his point of view....then it is you
that has a problem with sanity.
--
Simkatu
Simkatu
Ball of Fluff wrote:
> Simkatu wrote:
> > Nec_V20 wrote:
> >
> > > Who will be the next person to fall victim to the "Not one of us"
> > > mentality?
> > >
> > > Who will be the curator(s) of the gallery (or tribunal) with regard to
> > > determining the legitimacy of "Being one of us"?
> > >
> > > When this kind of environment is allowed to flourish then no matter how
> > > high the initial ideals, only filth remains.
> >
> > My goodness. All this drama over a message board?
>
> Why not?
>
> Didn't I see you enter in some "drama" over the Fred Durks thing?
No. That isn't even close to this situation.
I entered into a long debate with Durks about his own statements,
because the evidence showed his statements and reality were not in
tune. My discussion was 99% involved with responding to the statements
that Durks made.
NEC on the other hand has come here to whine about Andreas. He is not
debating Andreas -- or responding to the comments of Andreas here -- he
is whining about how some guy moderates his own messageboard and he's
being a complete dick in the process -- by being a pompous asshole.
> Sometimes people feel passionately about some things.
So what?
When people feel passionate about ridiculous things and then become
pompous assholes and act like total dicks -- then they deserve to be
criticized.
Some people feel passionately that they should do all sorts of weird,
immoral, or dangerous things -- passion is no excuse for being a
pompous asshole.
> You know the old saying...walk a mile in his shoes, etc.
It is most difficult to "walk a mile in his shoes" when the asshole
won't even tell us what the fuck his specific problem with Andreas is.
He as written many posts now, probably over 20 -- and still hasn't even
said:
1. What is NEC's specific problem with Andreas.
2. What is NEC's specific remedy for the problem he has with Andreas.
3. What can the people of ARS do to help NEC resolve his problem.
Now supposedly, NEC has some problem with Andreas and wants us to help
him get Andreas to do something to appease NEC, right?
That is what this is about right?
--
Simkatu
Ball of Fluff
"Simkatu" <Sim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148837241....@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Ball of Fluff wrote:
>> Nec_V20 wrote:
>> > Simkatu,
>> >
>> > Ach, der getroffene Hund bellt.
>> >
>> > I'm sorry Alert you lost any reason to be taken seriously quite a few
>> > posts ago.
>> >
>> > When you eventually get that charisma bypass transplant you have been
>> > waiting for then perhaps, but until then you are like balls on the
>> > Pope.
>>
>> Oh, gawd, Nec, wrong again.
>>
>> The transplant needed is a ~sanity~ transplant.
>
> I'm not sane because I find it odd that someone would come here and
> whine about a messageboard?
Wasn't talking about you in that set of replies. Nor was Nec.
>
> So far NEC has not provided us with answers to these questions:
>
> 1. What are the specific complaints against Andreas
>
> 2. What specific demands do you make upon Andreas.
>
> 3. What can the people of ARS do to help resolve your problem with
> Andreas
>
True. He hasn't. And I think he should.
> If you think that what NEC is doing is helping him to win friends and
> influence people to take up for his point of view....then it is you
> that has a problem with sanity.
Naughty naughty.
See above.
Nec_V20
there is nothing about your posts to OCMB or here that a little bsod
couldn't improve - I'll see what I can do for you.
It seems that you and Kusinagi's Ghost are actually trying to implement
RFC 2795.
I still can't see any works of Shakespeare though (unless you count
your own left hand mousing of course).
I would have quoted the post I am replying to, but it was so inferior,
that even my clipboard refused to accept it.
BTW, ElRon's "tech" is about your limit (now that's sad) as has been
witnessed by your bumbling attempts at being a wannabe techie on OCMB
where you showed yourself up as the true zbeba
Before I forget, MissDorfl has posted a link on OCMB that might go a
ways to clear up your obvious lack of erudition.
For anyone else who might be interested in knowing just what a
lightweight Alert is, even as a wannabe techie:
http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
Apart from the URL above Alert, my only other advice to you would be
that you take the meds - you obviously need them.
Nec_V20
the very fact that you even think that you know what you are talking
about is frightening, in and of, itself; basically because it would be
even more frightening to me, if I knew what it was.
BTW if Alert mentions MILF to you, believe me when I say, he might have
found it on the Internet, but it has very little to do with DNS -
seriously, you can believe me on this one.
Oh and another thing, if Alert talks to you about IP, I'm not kidding
you here, it really doesn't have anything to do with putting the toilet
seat back down afterwards.
barbz
Okay, got it. You're a computer nerd. And worse, one who flaunts his
knowledge, oh, AS IF nobody without his massive intellect could possibly
figure out which wires go where. Please. Quit embarrassing yourself.
So you have arcane knowledge of puters most people lack.
That doesn't mean we couldn't if we chose to learn, believe me.
And that IP crack? Pathetic, lame, double plus ungood. Anyone with
internet access knows what IP is. Quit overestimating your own
brilliance and underestimating everyone else.
So, ya got kicked out of the club. Nobody here gives a rats ass. Get
over it.
--
I. P. Freely
Rev. Norle Enturbulata
"barbz" <xenu...@netscape.net> wrote in message
news:7VAgg.1448$sP1.80@fed1read07...
Nec_V20
don't try to make me responsible for your own feelings of inferiority
or inadequacy regarding tech that actually works.
You're starting to rack up more foot bullets than RTC.
On the good side however, I see that you have mastered the art of the
single entendre.
barbz
> Barbz,
>
> don't try to make me responsible for your own feelings of inferiority
> or inadequacy regarding tech that actually works.
I have none. Microskills is always running ads. But I don't care. I
don't want to work with computers. It looks REALLY BORING from here.
>
> You're starting to rack up more foot bullets than RTC.
Says the whiny little baby.
>
> On the good side however, I see that you have mastered the art of the
> single entendre.
>
Ptthh...you're probably sitting back right now, rubbing your hands
gleefully over your astonishingly brilliant bon mots.
Alas, your only a legend in your own mind. And an asshole in everyone
else's.
--
Barb
Nec_V20
Barbz,
you could do with a little diversity with regard to your invective.
Unless of course you find that your posts to date have been the
pinnacle of your literary ambition and/or prowess.
You sound as if you have been watching way too much Fox News (which
would explain a lot).
barbz
Yeah, yeah, Fox News, got it, ouch. Yawn.
K, jump in now so you can get the Last Word In. I'm done with this
thread, besides, you sound like your ego could use the Last Word boost.
Don't forget, I'll be watching for that Last Word!
Ta ta, now.
Toodles!
Nec_V20
BoF,
because you are interested I'll give you my replies.
QUOTE
1. What are the specific complaints against Andreas
UNQUOTE
In one word hypocrisy.
As you know I warned long ago of what would happen on OCMB, and I think
you will agree that everything I said then (over two years ago) has
come to pass.
In recent times (since he assumed the position of moderator as dictated
by the "Peter Principle") he has made a mockery of his own ROC or FAQ
as he likes to call it.
I know Merlin personally and without saying too much, he gave up the
position as moderator on OCMB in disgust, and it was not disgust with
regard to myself - 'nuff said?
As you well know, Merlin kept me to a higher standard of posting than
he did others, simply because we did and do know each other privately.
QUOTE
2. What specific demands do you make upon Andreas.
UNQUOTE
It's his ball and he can pick it up in a cream puff any time he wants,
so that question warrants no answer from me except (and I'm sorry for
doing this to you BoF) of pointing you to my answer to your previous
question.
QUOTE
3. What can the people of ARS do to help resolve your problem with
Andreas.
UNQUOTE
You're kidding me - right?
So far most of the monochrome facilitators of RTC who I have had the
misfortune of meeting here can't even find their own ARS with both
hands, a torch and a map.
Perhaps if I had publicly disconnected from you and Terril, and did not
consider you to be my friends, then I might still be posting on OCMB.
Or if I did so now, then the fickle morons who call themselves
"critics" would turn around and "support" me.
Fat chance then and fat chance now of my ever doing that. You know that
I still consider Scientology to be a political anathema (upon which you
and I disagree), and RTC to be a criminal organization (upon which we
are, I think, in accord).
The only people I feel sorry for on OCMB are those, who although they
do, or might in future, want to reject RTC, but still wish to hold on
to some validity of Scientology for themselves (after all many have
spent not only years, but also decades immersed in that environment)
will be mercilessly hounded to renounce and repent any and all
connection to their past or else be hounded off the critical board back
into the arms of the waiting RTC.
John Dorsay
> Nec_V20 wrote:
>
>> LX,
>>
>> the very fact that you even think that you know what you are talking
>> about is frightening, in and of, itself; basically because it would be
>> even more frightening to me, if I knew what it was.
>>
>> BTW if Alert mentions MILF to you, believe me when I say, he might have
>> found it on the Internet, but it has very little to do with DNS -
>> seriously, you can believe me on this one.
>>
>> Oh and another thing, if Alert talks to you about IP, I'm not kidding
>> you here, it really doesn't have anything to do with putting the toilet
>> seat back down afterwards.
>>
> Okay, got it. You're a computer nerd. And worse, one who flaunts his
Noooooo....., it's a computer nerd wannabe. A "lamer".
Computer nerds do not need to be reminded to quote from the messages
they reply to.
John
Nec_V20
barbz wrote:
TTFN
Nec_V20
John,
why not try to catch me out?
Simkatu
Nec_V20 wrote:
> QUOTE
> 1. What are the specific complaints against Andreas
> UNQUOTE
>
> In one word hypocrisy.
>
> As you know I warned long ago of what would happen on OCMB, and I think
> you will agree that everything I said then (over two years ago) has
> come to pass.
>
> In recent times (since he assumed the position of moderator as dictated
> by the "Peter Principle") he has made a mockery of his own ROC or FAQ
> as he likes to call it.
>
> I know Merlin personally and without saying too much, he gave up the
> position as moderator on OCMB in disgust, and it was not disgust with
> regard to myself - 'nuff said?
>
> As you well know, Merlin kept me to a higher standard of posting than
> he did others, simply because we did and do know each other privately.
Hypocrisy isn't a specific complaint. What specific actions by
Andreas do you consider hypocrisy?
> QUOTE
> 2. What specific demands do you make upon Andreas.
> UNQUOTE
>
> It's his ball and he can pick it up in a cream puff any time he wants,
> so that question warrants no answer from me except (and I'm sorry for
> doing this to you BoF) of pointing you to my answer to your previous
> question.
Do you wish Andreas to make any specific changes at all?
> QUOTE
> 3. What can the people of ARS do to help resolve your problem with
> Andreas.
> UNQUOTE
>
> You're kidding me - right?
>
> So far most of the monochrome facilitators of RTC who I have had the
> misfortune of meeting here can't even find their own ARS with both
> hands, a torch and a map.
>
> Perhaps if I had publicly disconnected from you and Terril, and did not
> consider you to be my friends, then I might still be posting on OCMB.
> Or if I did so now, then the fickle morons who call themselves
> "critics" would turn around and "support" me.
>
> Fat chance then and fat chance now of my ever doing that. You know that
> I still consider Scientology to be a political anathema (upon which you
> and I disagree), and RTC to be a criminal organization (upon which we
> are, I think, in accord).
>
> The only people I feel sorry for on OCMB are those, who although they
> do, or might in future, want to reject RTC, but still wish to hold on
> to some validity of Scientology for themselves (after all many have
> spent not only years, but also decades immersed in that environment)
> will be mercilessly hounded to renounce and repent any and all
> connection to their past or else be hounded off the critical board back
> into the arms of the waiting RTC.
>From your long-winded reply, we get no answer.
What can the people reading your complaints here on A.R.S. specifically
do to help you resolve your differences with Andreas? Do you intend
for us to help you? Are you just looking for ideas? Do you want us
to pressure Andreas to do something?
What exactly is the purpose of your complaint?
What is the result you intend?
--
Simkatu
Ball of Fluff
"John Dorsay" <restim...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hLDgg.152$Wy.1...@news20.bellglobal.com...
Could be lack of familiarity with the new google format. I saw a lot of
people struggle with that.
C
Nec_V20
Simkatu wrote:
Simkatu,
you have it ass-backwards. The result is what is going to continue
tearing OCMB apart as a forum for critics. I am not complaining, I am
commenting.
As long as I was on OCMB I kicked enough ass into shape - including
BoF's, and she will not post any different. I am hard but fair.
So what do I intend?
Well when OCMB finally becomes a mini-RTC with sec-checks, figurative
R2-45, fair game and disconnection as "business as usual", then there
can't be a Dubya or a Condi or a Rummy or an Andreas saying, "Well no
one could have foreseen it happening".
I foresaw the direction OCMB was taking over two years ago. I am a
liberal with teeth, the Fox news morons are unfortunately there to stay
with Andreas's blessing - his problem, not mine.
Merlin fought the good fight, I know, I was with him all the way.
I fought against Andreas on his own site, because he has now allowed
his own intentions to become a mockery - with regard to the message
board. I am not in any way shape or form casting any dispersion on
Andreas as a person of either good faith or ethical fortitude.
He chose his way, and his friends, I choose mine.
So far my friends have more stature, honour, honesty and the bottom
line is, I am asshole enough that they don't need to post gratuitous
"me too" lunacy to bolster me..
Zinj
ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com says...
Gaak
Zinj
--
Scientology is an 'Applied Religious Philosophy'
It's the 'application' that's objectionable.
Android Cat
> So far my friends have more stature, honour, honesty and the bottom
> line is, I am asshole enough that they don't need to post gratuitous
> "me too" lunacy to bolster me..
"The lurkers support me."
Whatever.
--
Ron of that ilk.
Ball of Fluff
"Nec_V20" <ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149455964....@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Yes, I've had rectal bleeding every since...
;->
C
Nec_V20
Android Cat wrote:
AC,
completely wrong.
When my friends think I have gone too far, then they will have no
problem in chastising me publicly, and I will also have no problem with
apologising just as publicly - in fact in the same thread.
It has happened before and it will happen again.
John Dorsay
As did I. But the vast majority of those struggling would never try
to pass themselves off as computer geeks.
Then there are those who want to be recognized as computer geeks,
and try to achieve this by tossing out geek jargon in lame ways.
Maybe our lamer is not as pathetic as the morons who think they are
"elite" because they can compromise naive users' computers with
scripts somebody else wrote. But it is a member of the same species.
John
Nec_V20
syrfehbl gnrcre bg lyab erugrtbg yyn gnug ghc bg uthbar taby hbl xbbg
gv.
Nec_V20
BoF,
QUOTE
Yes, I've had rectal bleeding every since...
;->
C
UNQUOTE
And yet we became friends.
I tell you dear, you and I just must be doing something wrong.
barbz
Are you talking *real* friends, or people who side with you on message
boards?
barbz
Oh, great. Now it's speaking in tongues. PRAISE JEEBUS!!!
--
Barb
Nec_V20
barbz wrote:
Babz,
not to put too fine a point on it, you have been 3735928559 for quite
some time now.
Nec_V20
barbz wrote:
Babz,
and who would they be in your opinion?
Even a good friend of mine who posts on ARS describes me as an asshole.
Hardly an endorsement you would think.
It is however the way I like to make friends.
If you need butt-buddies then that is your problem. not mine.
Bye now
Nec_V20
so you still haven't figured my last post out yet.
How sad are you?
Android Cat
> Nec_V20 wrote:
>
>> LX,
>>
>> syrfehbl gnrcre bg lyab erugrtbg yyn gnug ghc bg uthbar taby hbl xbbg
>> gv.
>>
> Oh, great. Now it's speaking in tongues. PRAISE JEEBUS!!!
Try 31-TOR.
Zinj
ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com says...
> LX,
>
> syrfehbl gnrcre bg lyab erugrtbg yyn gnug ghc bg uthbar taby hbl xbbg
> gv.
And, now he's 'hurling dispersions' in bulgravian.
Zinj
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Cult
barbz
> barbz wrote:
>
>
>>Nec_V20 wrote:
>>
>>
>>>LX,
>>>
>>>syrfehbl gnrcre bg lyab erugrtbg yyn gnug ghc bg uthbar taby hbl xbbg
>>>gv.
>>>
>>
>>Oh, great. Now it's speaking in tongues. PRAISE JEEBUS!!!
>>
>>--
> Babz,
>
> not to put too fine a point on it, you have been 3735928559 for quite
> some time now.
That's Barb, not to put too fine a point on it, if you don't mind.
0010 01 01 000 1010 0110 1001! :P
barbz
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "Zinj" <zinj...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.1eed4a2ef...@news.day.sbcglobal.net...
> It is 'casting aspersions', Nec, you sorry fuckwit.
>
> Does it hurt being an illiterate douche bag?
>
> Tell us if it does so that we might all mock your 5We3T pain.
>
> Yours in Enturbulating Entheta,
>
> Lord Xenu
> Your Friendly Galactic Overseer
> ===
> http://www.xenu.net
> http://www.whyaretheydead.net
> http://www.lermanet.com
> http://www.torymagoo.org
> http://www.xenutv.com
> ======================
> ¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·-> Lord Xenu © <-·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBRIOHNQfIkDIChKGyEQK0uACdHGUpZN05Q1L9uXYf47/RkxNGxsEAn3hv
> C+AbTORIO0cz9E9c/fZq4V8O
> =pIDz
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
Oh, sweet Jeebus.
Don't EVER correct Zinj. He was just playing around with words. Believe
me, he knows better...if he says 'dispersions' it's because he wanted
to, not because he's some nerk from the Bozarks.
Correcting Zinj's English is like correcting mine. Whatever we say is
entirely intentional. Just a friendly headzup, yo.
barbz
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> "barbz" <xenu...@netscape.net> wrote in message
> news:uKLgg.1475$sP1.1474@fed1read07...
> I was mocking Nec, not Zinj.
>
> Nec had used that phrase earlier and I was joining Zinj in cutting on
> 'Nec the Nad-less'. :-)
>
>
>
>>--
>>Barb
>>Chaplain, ARSCC
>>xenu...@netscape.net
>>
>>"Every week, every month, every year, every decade and now
>>every century, Scientology does weird and stupid things
>>to damage its own reputation."
>>-Steve Zadarnowski
>>
>>"Comparing Scientology to a motorcycle gang is a gross,
>>unpardonable insult to bikers everywhere. Even at our worst, we are
>>never as bad as Scientology."
>>-ex-member, Thunderclouds motorcycle "club"
>>
>>"$cientology sees the world this way: One man with a picket sign:
>>terrorism. Five thousand people dead in a deliberate inferno: business
>>opportunity.
>>
>>$cientology oozes _under_ terrorists to hide."
>> -Chris Leithiser
>>
>
>
> Yours in Enturbulating Entheta,
>
> Lord Xenu
> Your Friendly Galactic Overseer
> ===
> http://www.xenu.net
> http://www.whyaretheydead.net
> http://www.lermanet.com
> http://www.torymagoo.org
> http://www.xenutv.com
> ======================
> ¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·-> Lord Xenu © <-·´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
>
> iQA/AwUBRIOI8wfIkDIChKGyEQI0IQCdGk3AskpB9SftB5R3+eMILJmLkBAAoJJ4
> +GyqPTwEDjmeVRGv3xU4jIh9
> =iX7P
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
Oh, whew. I've been skipping every other NEC post to see if they were
stylistically progressing. Nup, he ain't goin' anywhere real soon, it
seems. But reading them one at a time gives me this deep, icky sense of
pity for this poor fellow, who is desperately trying to convince
someone, anyone, of his superiority. Reading every other one reduces the
pity by half. Heh, you should try it. Now I'll go back and read the
other half of them so as to better understand your poking him with stix.
Again, WHEW. Coulda been ugly!
cheese,
Ball of Fluff
Contrary to what a few old biddies may be sayin' round these
parts...sometimes I ~really~ love being wrong...
C
Michael Reuss
> that you [realpch] "don't know" is pretty obvious.
> You have never been a NetAdmin, let alone a moderator of a little MB.
> You have the, "confidence of ignorance" because you essentially have no
> idea of what you are talking about.
I'll bet yore wun of them durn mind-reading MENSA GENIUSES, ain't you?
Michael Reuss
Honorary Kid
Nec_V20
QUOTE
I was mocking Nec, not Zinj.
Nec had used that phrase earlier and I was joining Zinj in cutting on
'Nec the Nad-less'. :-)
UNQUOTE
I take it you can actually point to the post where I used that phrase.
No?
I thought not.
A search only turns up Zinj's use of the phrase.
What was that you were saying about me?
Andreas Heldal-Lund - www.xenu.net
[Nec_V20 has] never applied to have the ban lifted so it never
was. On the contrary, he has in writing repeatedly denied to do
so or to accept the rules of OCMB. He also refused to accept
that he had done anything wrong and he's been e-mailing me to
the extent (and with a language) that I refuse to reply to him
anymore. Those who want to make their own rules can also make
their own message board.
I've communicated with thousands and thousands of people since I
started OC 10 years ago. Without doubt the person behind Nec_V20
is in a class all by himself in my book. I lack words. Based on
how he has been acting he will not be allowed on OCMB until
something dramatically changes. He is currently the only person
of all the thousands who have been here who have managed to
create such a position for himself.
For now that is all I want to comment on this character and his
case. I'm fed up.
From:
http://ocmb.xenu.net/ocmb/viewtopic.php?t=18405&postorder=asc&start=210
I'll add on ARS: I'LL HAPPILY SHARE WITH YOU OUR E-MAIL
COMMUNICATION SINCE HIS BAN ON OCMB IF HE ALLOWS ME. Then you
guys can judge me/him/it yourself. But who cares??? There are
more important things than this loose cannon.
On 21 May 2006 01:08:49 -0700, "Nec_V20"
<ARC_Tr...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Here is a an open letter which I have sent to Andreas Heildal Lund per
>E-Mail:
>
>
>QUOTE
>Andreas,
>
>OK you banned ARC_Triangle from OCMB, but with regard to the reason why
>
>I came back under a new nic, what have you done with regard to the
>violations of your so exalted "Rules of Conduct" with regard to Terril?
>
>
>If you take a look at the thread, "Tech outside the CoS" and you want
>to uphold what you said on XenuTV when you were in the USA, then excuse
>
>me if I find that there is a slight discrepancy.
>
>If you do not want to redress it, then I can invent a lot of different
>personas to hold a mirror up to your statements, until you do.
>
>Terril is an honourable person. We asked him about four years ago to
>not post "wins" all over the place, but to confine it to his own
>thread(s).
>
>He did and has done so.
>
>Condoning the abuse that Terril has had to endure on "Tech outside the
>COS", makes you (with regard to your spouting of the "FAQ") an
>hypocrite.
>
>With no regard to you whatsoever
>UNQUOTE
Best wishes,
Andreas Heldal-Lund # home.online.no/~heldal # www.xenu.net
Ph: +47 8800 6666 # Addr: Postboks 131, N-4098 Tananger, Norway
---------------------------------------------------------------
Each of us does what we can do. Our obligation is to do it as
well as we can, with as much grace, dignity, integrity and
honor our egos can tolerate.
-------------------------------------[Robert Vaughn Young]-----
Nec_V20
QUOTE
I'll bet yore wun of them durn mind-reading MENSA GENIUSES, ain't you?
Michael Reuss
Honorary Kid
UNQUOTE
Exactly how and why would that be a bad thing?
I don't see anything wonderful in being as thick as a plank - unless of
course you want to become President of the United States.
barbz
> Michael Reuss,
>
> QUOTE
> I'll bet yore wun of them durn mind-reading MENSA GENIUSES, ain't you?
>
> Michael Reuss
> Honorary Kid
> UNQUOTE
>
> Exactly how and why would that be a bad thing?
Paying money to join a klub full of "people of our caliber"...I can see
how self satisfied minkeys like yourself would be impressed by it and
think it a good investment.
>
> I don't see anything wonderful in being as thick as a plank - unless of
> course you want to become President of the United States.
>
I notice you did not say yea or nay as to membership in this
self-esteemed body, leaving us to draw our own conclusions.
Alert
Nec_V20 wrote:
> Alert,
>
> there is nothing about your posts to OCMB or here that a little bsod
> couldn't improve - I'll see what I can do for you.
>
> It seems that you and Kusinagi's Ghost are actually trying to implement
> RFC 2795.
>
> I still can't see any works of Shakespeare though (unless you count
> your own left hand mousing of course).
>
> I would have quoted the post I am replying to, but it was so inferior,
> that even my clipboard refused to accept it.
>
> BTW, ElRon's "tech" is about your limit (now that's sad) as has been
> witnessed by your bumbling attempts at being a wannabe techie on OCMB
> where you showed yourself up as the true zbeba
>
> Before I forget, MissDorfl has posted a link on OCMB that might go a
> ways to clear up your obvious lack of erudition.
>
> For anyone else who might be interested in knowing just what a
> lightweight Alert is, even as a wannabe techie:
>
> http://www.3com.com/other/pdfs/infra/corpinfo/en_US/501302.pdf
>
> Apart from the URL above Alert, my only other advice to you would be
> that you take the meds - you obviously need them.
@|-||-||-| |\|3(, \X/|-|@+ @ +|2@61( \X/@|\||\|@|}3 `/0|_| |23@||`/
@|23. 1 |\/|@`/ |}3 |\|3\X/ +0 1+, |}|_|+ 1 (3|2+@1|\||`/ |<|\|0\X/
3|\|0|_|6|-| +0 (|-|0|* `/0|_| |_||* 1|\|+0 |}1+$, 1|\| @ |}`/+3$
$3|\|$3 +|-|@+ 1$. $+1|| |*1$$1|\|6 @|\|[) |\/|0@|\|1|\|6 |1|<3 +|-|3
|}@|}`/ `/0|_| @|23. |<33|* $3|\|[)1|\|6 `/0|_| |++|3 |\/|1|\||\|10|\|$
|\|3(, `/0|_| |-|@\/3 |\|0+|-|1|\|6 @+ @||. \X/|-|3|23@$, 1 |-|@\/3
j|_|$+ $@+ |}@(|< @|\|[) 0|}$3|2\/3[) @|\|[) @|}$0|2|}3[) |23|3\/3|\|+
[)@+@. `/0|_| |-|@\/3 +|-|3 1|\/||*|23$$10|\| `/0|_||2 $0|\/|3 $0|2+
0|= '60[)' 0|\| +|-|3 |\|3|2+, \X/|-|3|23@$ `/0|_||2 |\|0+|-|1|\|6
|\/|0|23 +|-|@|\| @ |<3`/|}0@|2[) |\|@z1. `/0|_| |-|1[)3 |}3|-|1|\|[)
\/@|210|_|$ |_|$3|2|\|@|\/|3$ |}3|_|@$3 `/0|_||23 @ (|-|1(|<3|\|
$|-|1+. +|-|@+$ |=1|\|3, 1 |3@\/3 +|-|3 |-|1[)1|\|6 |=0|2 $0|=+(0(|<$
@$ `/0|_||2$3||=. `/0|_| |\/|@`/ |=00| $0|\/|3 |*30|*|3 1|\|+0
+|-|1|\||<1|\|6 `/0|_||23 @|| +|-|@+..|}|_|+ `/0|_| [)0|\|+ |=00|
|\/|3, |\|0+ 1|\| +|-|3 |3@$+. 1|\|$|_||+1|\|6 |\/|3 [)03$
|\|0+|-|1|\|6 |\/|0|23 +|-|@|\| [)3|\/|0|\|$+|2@+3 `/0|_||23 @ (|@$$1(
|=|_|(|<|}@6. |\/||_|$+ |23@|| |*1$$ `/0|_| 0|=|= +|-|@+ 1 |\|3\X/
$+|2@16|-|+ @\X/@`/ \X/|-|3|\| `/0|_| |}00|<3[) 1|\|+0 (|@|\/||}@|<3 @$
$0|\/|30|\|3 3|$3. |=|_||\||\|`/ +|-|1|\|6 1$ |\|3(, 1 |<|\|0\X/
\X/|-|3|\| 3\/3|2 `/0|_||23 +|-|3|23, `/0|_| |-|0|\|3$+|`/ |}313\/3
`/0|_||23 +|-|@+ 600[)? `/0|_||23 @ |=|_|(|<1|\| |*|_|$$`/ |*@|. $0 63+
|}@(|< 0|\| `/0|_||2 $0@|*|}0>< @|\|[) (0|\|+1|\||_|\X/ \X/|-|1|\|1|\|6
|1|<3 @ |}1+(|-|.1|\| (|0$1|\|6 1'[) |1|<3 +0 $@`/ ..$|_|(|< $|-|1+!
**|20||$ |\|3(_\/20 +|-|3 |\/|@61(8|}@||**