OT 3 results
Jeff Jacobsen
The ability gained from OT 3 is said to be "return of self-determinism, freedom
from overwhelm." Does this means that Clears, OT I's and OT II's are NOT
self-determined, and are NOT free from overwhelm?
arnie lerma - www.lermanet.com
wrote:
>
>The ability gained from OT 3 is said to be "return of self-determinism, freedom
>from overwhelm." Does this means that Clears, OT I's and OT II's are NOT
>self-determined, and are NOT free from overwhelm?
In Scientology you are trained to believe that you get what you pay
for.
If dont think you got what you paid for, you are free to pay for it
again.....
and again
but perhaps, after the NEXT expensive secret level you will get
"handled" what you thought you got into scientology to get handled in
the first place.....
Or perhaps the next....
Why is Scientology's bridge so expensive?
Ask Michael Pattinson, A "New OT 8"
This gentlemen has done the entire 'bridge to total freedom'
listen to his one page sworn as true-notarized statement.
The author wishes this to be reposted widely for the world to
know the true nature of Scientology.
Michael Pattinson
<address deleted>
Beverly Hills, Ca 90211
20 September 1997
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
I strongly feel that it is my civic duty to bring to the attention of
the competent authorities of the United States and other concerned
countries
a matter of severe abuses and destructive activities by the "Church"
of
Scientology. I am at their disposition for more information on all of
this.
I was shocked at the use of top celebrities by Scientology to try and
give an impression of it which, per my own experiences, is a false
impression.
When I compare the ridiculous charges made by Scientology against the
German government with what I know Scientology (underlined) has been
doing itself I find a very strong similarity indeed. I have decided to
speak out
about this publicly.
I was, until earlier this year, one of Scientology's "celebrities". I
am a professional artist, having a 25 year career internationally with
over
99% sales. I was in Scientology for 23 years, did very many courses,
and
reached the highest available level of "New O.T.8." My knowledge of
the inner
workings of Scientology is extensive. I have information about the
many
instances of abuses of current and former Scientology members and of
lies
Scientology has generated about itself to give a wrong public
impression.
Among the many things I can relate, here are just a few from recent
times:
1) From 1991 to 1996 I was the subject of viscous machinations by
several "churches" of Scientology to destroy my name and repute, and
to involve me in expensive "justice handling" within the organization.
Apart from the horrific emotional stress over five years it cost me
well over
$120,000 to clear my name of accusations of things I had never done
in the first place! I have full documentation of all these multiple
abuses.
2) In June of 1996 I was held against my will in the Scientology,
Clearwater,
Florida facility and "ordered" to pay $7,400 before they would let me
out
of the room. I did not want to pay for what the two staff members
insisted
I must have, and what ensued was a verbal battle, emotional trauma and
an attempt at financial extortion. After a time I managed to escape
the
physical detention, but two "Sea Org" members chased me right out into
the streets of Clearwater to try to recapture me. I did not pay the
money. This
incident is on file with the Clearwater Police Department.
3) In June of 1991 I was forced to pay, despite vehement
protestations, the
sum of $7,400 to Scientology on the "Freewinds" ship. The ruse used
on that Wednesday was that if I did not pay then they would withhold
my passport
from me until I did pay. They did so and I had to pay the money to get
it back.
4) At the end of 1996 I was subjected to [a] horrible kind of
"religious
deprogramming" in the Scientology "Fort Harrison Hotel". This was
done,
using an "E-meter", by a top official of the "Religious technology
Center" (RTC)
namely Mr. Marty Rathbun. I was interrogated for several hours on the
most
intimate personal religious beliefs (Christian) and his actions were
designed
clearly to get me to give up my Christian religious beliefs in
exchange
for RTC's "eligibility authorization" to read a confidential
publication
about a defective "OT level" I had previously completed (OT 7).
His utter contempt for my religious beliefs were all to apparent. He
felt
that all other religions apart from Scientology should be destroyed
and
probably would be in time by Scientology, using RTC's programs
of "eligibility's" as the means of forcing people to give up other
faiths.
I also had to undergo many hours of 'false data removal",,,to try to
"get me to realize" that the ONLY valid religion was Scientology.
It did not work.
My considered, personal opinion is that Scientology is definitely
NOT A RELIGION.
These are a few of the many things I can testify to.
I declare under penalty of perjury under California Laws that the
above
is true and correct per my own personal experiences.
20 September 1997 Sea Beach California
_________________________
signed - Michael P Pattinson
CALIFORNIA ALL PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT
State of California
County of Orange
On 9/20/97 before me, Dy Avalos, Notary Public
personally appeared MICHAEL P. PATTINSON
Proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be
the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument
and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his
authorized capacity and that by his signature on the instrument
the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted
executed this instrument
WITNESS my hand and seal
DY ANN MARIE AVALOS
Commission #1092805
Notary Public - California
Los Angeles County
My Commission Expires Mar 28, 2000
Description of Attached document
Title or Type of document ; Pattinson: To whom it may concern
Document Date September 20 1997
http://www.lermanet.com/persecution/pattinson.html
Ferengi + Borg = Scientology
I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speak.
The only thing that always works in scientology are its lawyers
The internet is the liberty tree of the new millennium
Secrets are the mortar binding lies as bricks together into prisons for the mind
http://www.lermanet.com - mentioned 4 January 2000 in
The Washington Post's - 'Reliable Source' column re "Scientologist with no HEAD"
Roland
news:vbodkcs...@corp.supernews.com...
Not enough, obviously. They still have money in their bank accounts.
BarbaraSchwarz
Here are some information, about Michael Pattinson:
He claimed himself, he was always a Christian, and apparently never a
Scientologist. He entered the orgs, to sell his boring paintings to
the many Scientologists that support their artists. Pattinson lied to
all of them that he would be a Scio, that is why they mainly bought
from him. He used them.
He paid service in, so that he can sue SCN for fraud. He never had the
wish to better himself, he never wanted to be a Scientologist. He
never worked himself honestly through auditing and seminars. He just
wanted to make money through selling his pictures and through suing
SCN for damages. It was a business deal from the beginning to the end
in the eyes of Pattinson. - I think that the orgs should have figured
that out much sooner, what kind of guy that is, and they should have
declared him suppressive right after he came in the orgs to infiltrate
and destroy. But the bad thing is, that Pattinson is not the only SP
and infiltrator. There are others in the orgs, that helped him and did
let him stay in the orgs.
He made the deprogramming attempt by Marty Rathbun (de
Rothschild)completely up. Pattinson probably even wants to extort de
Rothschild money by lying about Marty. Pattinson knows that Mark
Rathbun is wrongfully incarcerated and can't defend himself as a
person which is free and on his own. Marty never would "deprogram"
anybody from any "religion". That is out of character for him. Michael
Pattinson saw the official photo as published by SCN on their web
site. He knew very well, that the person that "tried to deprogam him"
was not Marty Rathbun, nevertheless Pattinson keeps the lies against
Marty up. He could not have done it, because was wrongfully
incarcerated in the time, in which Pattinson claimed, that the
"deprogramming" took place.
Pattinson is knowingly lying about Marty Rathbun, and also lies about
so many other things in his affidavits. Pattinson is such a crook.
That is the true nature about Pattinson, professonal liar.
Hey, Pattinson, sue me, I would love that. To expose you as a fraud is
a walk in the park.
Barbara Schwarz
roger gonnet
"Skipper" <skipsp...@earthlink.net> a écrit dans le message de
news:100520031855172067%skipsp...@earthlink.net...
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> In article <a6bc00a0.03051...@posting.google.com>,
> BarbaraSchwarz <BarbaraSc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > ale...@nospam.bellatlantic.net (arnie lerma - www.lermanet.com) wrote in
> > message news:<3ebc61a5....@news.verizon.net>...
> > > On Fri, 09 May 2003 23:15:24 -0000, "Jeff Jacobsen" <cul...@ev1.net>
> > > wrote:
> >
> > Here are some information, about Michael Pattinson:
> >
> > He claimed himself, he was always a Christian, and apparently never a
> > Scientologist. He entered the orgs, to sell his boring paintings to
> > the many Scientologists that support their artists. Pattinson lied to
> > all of them that he would be a Scio, that is why they mainly bought
> > from him. He used them.
>
>
> I own a painting by Michael Pattinson.
>
> It's worth every penny I paid.
Indeed, Mickael paintings are excellent and original. I owned two
reproductions of pictures of him (photos he was selling cheap while he was
in Paris).
roger
barb
> X-No-archive: yes
>
> In article <a6bc00a0.03051...@posting.google.com>,
> BarbaraSchwarz <BarbaraSc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>message news:<3ebc61a5....@news.verizon.net>...
>>
>>>On Fri, 09 May 2003 23:15:24 -0000, "Jeff Jacobsen" <cul...@ev1.net>
>>>wrote:
>>
>>Here are some information, about Michael Pattinson:
>>
>>He claimed himself, he was always a Christian, and apparently never a
>>Scientologist. He entered the orgs, to sell his boring paintings to
>>the many Scientologists that support their artists. Pattinson lied to
>>all of them that he would be a Scio, that is why they mainly bought
>>from him. He used them.
>
>
>
> I own a painting by Michael Pattinson.
>
> It's worth every penny I paid.
>
>
> I've met the man, and I learend how he paints using a very unique
> method that follows the flow of classical music. I would recommend his
> work to anyone.
>
> I'm a successful person in several fields of the arts.
>
> You, on the other hand, are a conspicuously crazy nutcase whose sole
> purpse in life seems to be posting on a newsgroup.
>
> Try getting a life some time, you might enjoy it.
Ida has a painting by Pattinson over her piano. I do know art, and I
also know what I like, and I do like it very much.
Barbara Schwarz has no choice but to slam Michael's talent. To say
anything positive about it would be out-tech. Of course, the fact that
she is a fruitcake with no sense of aesthetic style has nothing to do
with it, but I suspect she wouldn't know a good piece of artwork if it
bit her in the ass!
--
--
barb
Chaplain, ARS
"After over 50 years, what has Scientology given the world? Misery,
hopelessness, broken families, desolation, death."
-Shydavid
BarbaraSchwarz
You you remember one of his paintings, in which he painted lots of
numbers, hanging from trees?
Barbara Schwarz
barb
So? You remember Salvadore Dali, who painted melted clocks hanging all
over stuff like dirty laundry? What's your point?
--
--
barb
Chaplain, ARS
"After over 50 years, what has Scientology given the world? Misery,
hopelessness, broken families, desolation, death."
-Shydavid
"I remember when my son said "Every day should be Mother's Day." But
those were the days before L Ron Hubbard came into his life."
--Ida Camburn
BarbaraSchwarz
> BarbaraSchwarz wrote:
> > "roger gonnet" <gon...@antisectes.net> wrote in message news:<3ebdf7c3$0$23447$626a...@news.free.fr>...
> >
> >>"Skipper" <skipsp...@earthlink.net> a écrit dans le message de
> >>news:100520031855172067%skipsp...@earthlink.net...
> >>
> >>>X-No-archive: yes
> >>>
> >>>In article <a6bc00a0.03051...@posting.google.com>,
> >>>BarbaraSchwarz <BarbaraSc...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>ale...@nospam.bellatlantic.net (arnie lerma - www.lermanet.com) wrote in
> >>>>message news:<3ebc61a5....@news.verizon.net>...
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Fri, 09 May 2003 23:15:24 -0000, "Jeff Jacobsen" <cul...@ev1.net>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>Here are some information, about Michael Pattinson:
> >>>>
> >>>>He claimed himself, he was always a Christian, and apparently never a
> >>>>Scientologist. He entered the orgs, to sell his boring paintings to
> >>>>the many Scientologists that support their artists. Pattinson lied to
> >>>>all of them that he would be a Scio, that is why they mainly bought
> >>>>from him. He used them.
> >>>
> >>>Hey you IGNORANT TWIT, whoever you actually are -
> >>>
> >>>I own a painting by Michael Pattinson.
> >>>
> >>>It's worth every penny I paid.
> >>
> >>Indeed, Mickael paintings are excellent and original. I owned two
> >>reproductions of pictures of him (photos he was selling cheap while he was
> >>in Paris).
> >>
> >>roger
> >
> >
> > numbers, hanging from trees?
> >
> > Barbara Schwarz
>
> So? You remember Salvadore Dali, who painted melted clocks hanging all
> over stuff like dirty laundry? What's your point?
>
> --
> --
> barb
> Chaplain, ARS
>
> "After over 50 years, what has Scientology given the world? Misery,
> hopelessness, broken families, desolation, death."
> -Shy david
>
> "I remember when my son said "Every day should be Mother's Day." But
> those were the days before L Ron Hubbard came into his life."
>
> --Ida Camburn
Ask Pattinson why that is the only picture of him that interests me.
He knows it, we had some postings going back and forth on that.
I did not post that Michael Pattinson paints unaesthetical. I think he
has not much talent as a painter, and his pictures are boring. But
that is not what bothers me about him. He is lying and making things
up. It's also easy to claim that Quentin was homosexual, and to put a
lot in his mouth when he is not more around to defend himself. Worse
is even to claim that Marty Rathbun tried to deprogram him. Pattinson
made that all up.
He also is not much of a man. He posted that when he was new in the
orgs, a woman in the Paris org mistreated him to tears. If it would
have happened, I would have just walked out of the orgs and would have
never returned. So why didn't he? Too much paint in the eyes to see
the door? I believe that 99 % of Pattinson's claims are made up.
But you really don't want to hear that, because you are also a master
in making things up.
Barbara Schwarz