== Litigation list ==
Should the list of litigation Barbara has started be included some
place, maybe as supporting a sub-page?
"The following is a non-exhaustive list of litigation Ms. Schwarz has
initiated."
[[User:Super7|Super 7 - Everything else is just transport]] 20:54, 24
August 2006 (UTC)
SUPER 7 IS A SOCK PUPPET OF THE ANTI-RELIGIOUS EXTREMISTS WHO POST
HATRED ON USENET. HE IS TOO STUPID TO UNDERSTAND PLEADINGS. HE HAS NO
CLUE WHAT THE CASES ARE ABOUT.
:Of course it should be included; it was in the deleted version. It
might still be on the web; if not, I downloaded a google cache version
a after the delete. The best would be to take it from the deleted
version. --[[User:Tilman|Tilman]] 06:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
WHY DID WIKIPEDIA DELIETE THE FIRST ARTICLE WHEN THE NEW ONE IS JUST AS
STUPID AND HATEFUL. YOU DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE CONTENT OF THE CASES
IS. NONE OF YOU EVER STUDIED THE CASES. WHAT A SHAME. YOU GUYS ARE
NON-PROFESSIONALS.
::The list goes something like -
::*Supreme
:: - to name just a few. [[User:Orsini|Orsini]] 09:12, 25 August 2006
(UTC)
"SOMETHING" LIKE THIS. HOW UNPROFESSIONAL.
Well, there is some duplication in the list, and it does need a
clean-up, but it seems that the list is rather long and distracts from
the article itself. That is why I was thinking in terms of a sub-page
rather than in the main line.
NOBODY UNDERSTOOD THE CONTENT OF THE CASES AND NOBODY UNDERSTAND THAT
THE UNITED STATES HAS A PROBLEM OF CORRUPT JUDGES NOT GRANTING RIGHTS
TO ESP. PRO SE ATTORNEYS. WIKIPEDIA SHOULD WRITE ABOUT THIS.
Also, many of the entries were added just before the great war started,
and do not have links to the source documents, something that should be
fixed if there are on-line versions available. (Not all courts have
their documents available via the internet.)
I'm not sure if the list should be alphabetic, or ordered by date of
initial action (if known.) [[User:Super7|Super 7 - Everything else is
just transport]] 21:06, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
YOU KNOW NOTHING, I NOTICED THAT. AREN'T YOU AFRAID THAT A REAL
RESEARCHER LOOKS AS THE CASES AND COMES TO THE CONCLUSION THAT I WAS
RIGHT? NAH, YOU CAN'T PREDICT WHAT IS AHEAD.
::Sorting the list by dates may be confusing, as could sorting the
cases in alphabetical order as some of the cases inter-relate. For
example, a case may go from the trial court, to the appeals court, to
the circuit court, then finally to the [[SCOTUS]], which is also why
some entries appear to be duplicated. A combination of alphabetical
and cases might be appropriate, but listing the cases strictly in
chronological order overlooks how a particular case may have run
through several courts over a period of years. Please also note the
Utah courts don't have an internet lookup system for dockets as yet.
[[User:Orsini|Orsini]] 22:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
WHICH IS NOT TRUE EITHER. IT JUST SHOWS THAT ORSINI DOESN'T KNOW HER
WAY AROUND IN COURTS.
:WP:NOT. Why clutter up the place with a big list of cases that only
support editors who have already shown they intend to spread the
''rumor'' that Barbara only loses case? I'd also like to see the
case(s) she won against the german government in the late 80's.
--[[User:HResearcher|HResearcher]] 12:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I WON THE CASES THAT THE ANTI-RELIGIOUS EXTREMISTS, INCLUDING tILMAN'S
FRIEND HEINEMANN FILED AGAINST ME IN GERMANY IN THE 80s TO HARASS ME.
THERE WERE MANY. HOWEVER, I WOULD HAVE ALSO WON THE CASES IN THE USA,
IF JUDGES WOULD NOT HAVE IMMUNITY AGAINST CORRUPT RULINGS, WHICH THEY
RENDER.
THERE ARE GROUPS WITH LAW PROFESSIONALS, WHO WANT TO JAIL JUDGES.WHY
DON'T YOU WRITE ABOUT THAT?
::I thought it was you who had complained that there weren't enough
sources, especially for the "more than 80" allegation.
::Feel free to ask Barbara to mail you copies of the cases she "won".
--[[User:Tilman|Tilman]] 14:47, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
WHY WOULD I ANSWER ANYBODY WHO IS SENT MY ABUSER AND PRO EUGENICS MAN
TILMAN JOERG HAUSHERR?
::It would be more accurate to state that Schwarz has lost every case
she has filed in the United States; go through that list, look at the
case summaries. ''She claims'' she's won cases in Germany. ''She
claims'' also to have lived in a submarine base under Great Salt Lake
as a child. Sorry HResearcher, but until photographic or substantial
evidence of either claim are forthcoming, I consider them to be
''Chatanooga.'' [[User:Orsini|Orsini]] 22:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
ORSINI AND WIKIPEDIA WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR YOUR LIES AND LIBEL.
PEOPLE, WHO ATTACK ME HAVE MOST OF THE TIME A SIGNIFICANT CRIMINAL
HISTORY. I AM SURE THAT ORSINI IS NO EXCEPTION.
BARBARA SCHWARZ
Nothing worse than people that refuse to quite telling the truth about you.
>STOP HARASSING ME, WIKIPEDIA CULT. THIS CULT STLL DEFAMES AND LIBELS ME
>AS YOU CAN SEE HERE AND STILL CUT MY RIGHT FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEFEND
>MYSELF. I REALLY WANT WIKIPEDIA SUED. I HOPE THAT CLASS ACTION AGAINST
>WIKIPEDIA WILL GET OF THE GROUND SOON.
The heat death of the universe will occur before any court in this country
takes you seriously, Babbles.
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
RIP Irene Aldridge Compton
December 2, 1909, Keokee, Va.
August 24, 2006, Benham, Ky.
> STOP HARASSING ME, WIKIPEDIA CULT. THIS CULT STLL DEFAMES AND LIBELS ME
> AS YOU CAN SEE HERE AND STILL CUT MY RIGHT FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEFEND
> MYSELF. I REALLY WANT WIKIPEDIA SUED. I HOPE THAT CLASS ACTION AGAINST
> WIKIPEDIA WILL GET OF THE GROUND SOON.
Simple problem you have here - you put ALL of the information out into the
public domain. It can never be libel if it's the truth. So unless you're
saying that what you put out in the 92 part "epic" was all crap, you
haven't got a leg to stand on.
In the words of the man himself - "Prove it or lose it"
--
"ist du meine Mutter?" - der leerkinde
Tell me about it.
--
Barbara Schwarz (Looking for the original Mark [Marty] Rathbun. No
impostor, please!)
http://www.thunderstar.net/~schwarz/lrh/fbidocs.html
--
(I am concerned about Dave Touretzky's activities.)
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/
Read the pages on terrorist-friendly Andreas Heldal-Lund (arrested for
harassment):
http://www.religiousfreedomwatch.org/extremists/lund/Lund04.html
Wikipedia defamation scribbler and pro eugenics Tilman Joerg Hausherr,
linked to the fanatical German secret service OPC, enemy of the USA
wants to hurt American tourism.
http://www.parishioners.org/extremists/hauser1.html
http://www.alarmgermany.org/tilman.htm
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.religion.scientology/msg/8962a9830812112f?hl=en&
Wikipedia defames and denies constitutional rights. The anti-free
speech leadership of Wikipedia banned me from correcting lies and
defamation around their article on me! Wikipedia is a destructive cult.
> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>
> > STOP HARASSING ME, WIKIPEDIA CULT. THIS CULT STLL DEFAMES AND LIBELS ME
> > AS YOU CAN SEE HERE AND STILL CUT MY RIGHT FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEFEND
> > MYSELF. I REALLY WANT WIKIPEDIA SUED. I HOPE THAT CLASS ACTION AGAINST
> > WIKIPEDIA WILL GET OF THE GROUND SOON.
>
> Simple problem you have here - you put ALL of the information out into the
> public domain. It can never be libel if it's the truth.
There is so much lies and libel on the Wikipiggi pages about me that I
could win a multi billion libel and defamation case against that
destructive scribbler cult.
>Paul F. Johnson schrieb:
>> Barbara Schwarz wrote:
>> > STOP HARASSING ME, WIKIPEDIA CULT. THIS CULT STLL DEFAMES AND LIBELS ME
>> > AS YOU CAN SEE HERE AND STILL CUT MY RIGHT FOR FREE SPEECH AND DEFEND
>> > MYSELF. I REALLY WANT WIKIPEDIA SUED. I HOPE THAT CLASS ACTION AGAINST
>> > WIKIPEDIA WILL GET OF THE GROUND SOON.
>> Simple problem you have here - you put ALL of the information out into the
>> public domain. It can never be libel if it's the truth.
>There is so much lies and libel on the Wikipiggi pages about me that I
>could win a multi billion libel and defamation case against that
>destructive scribbler cult.
I guess that's why you never won a single case you dumped on FOIA...
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros)
LAST GAME: Milwaukee 4, Houston 2 (May 9)
NEXT GAME: Saturday, October 7 vs. Grand Rapids, 7:35
>I guess that's why you never won a single case you dumped on FOIA...
Has she ever won even one case of any type? I know of none.
>There is so much lies and libel on the Wikipiggi pages about me
Where? Last time I looked everything was factual and backed up
with references. You just don't like the truth being told.
Isn't it time for you to dry the tears and move on, Barbara?
Indeed...her record makes the Houston Texans look like the last four Super
Bowl winners.