Re: Racial slurs in Canada
Lermanet.com
Scientology had to pay the largest libel settlement in Canadian
History!
That was a GOOD start!
http://www.lermanet.com/scientologynews/canada/toronto-manning-072195.htm
July 21, 1995
OTTAWA- The largest libel award in Canadian history – more than $1.6
million against the Church of Scientology and Toronto lawyer Morris
Manning – has been upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada.
The unanimous judgment means former crown attorney Casey Hill, now an
Ontario Court judge, can collect more than $1.45 million from the
church and $150,000 from Manning.
--------------
And if there were just ONE OT in Scientology the
"cleanshools" nick would not have to post LIES...
think about it..
And why didn't Doc Wong learn to fly?
He was 'OT'
what if OT is a LIE????
then you would realize you were CONNED.
Arnaldo Lerma
Lermanet.com Exposing the CON
WE COME BACK FOR OUR FRIENDS and FAMILY
to get them out while they are still alive!
I'd prefer to die speaking my mind than live fearing to speake
If the Borg were to breed with the Ferengi you'd get Scientology!
http://theunfunnytruth.ytmnd.com
http://ocmb.lermanet.us/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=381
Electronarcosis:
http://www.lermanet.com/emeter/hypnotism-today-1947/index.htm
"it's incredible how much money the hypnotized disciples of a clever and ruthless operator will plead and beg of him to accept from them"
http://www.lermanet.com/exit/hubbard-the-hypnotist4.htm
"Scientologists believe that most human problems
can be traced to lingering spirits of an extraterrestrial
people massacred by their ruler, Xenu, over 75 million
years ago. These spirits attach themselves by "clusters"
to individuals in the contemporary world, causing
spiritual harm and negatively influencing the lives
of their hosts"
[Judge Leonie Brinkema 4 Oct 96 Memorandum Opinion]
29 November 1995
Memorandum Opinion Judge Leonie Brinkema
"the Court is now convinced that the primary motivation..
in suing Lerma, ...is to stifle criticism of
Scientology in general and to harass its critics. "
What do we get from getting people out of scientology?
We create an individual who has become a Houdini of
all mind traps.. folks who won't be fooled again.
People who can DE-program, People who can spring mental
traps..
We create, by freeing someone of scientology, a being
who has the ability to break the strongest slave chains
of all.
Those forged of lies. (c) Arnaldo Lerma
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities
Voltaire (1694 - 1778)
"He exuded evil, malice, and stupidity"
Gore Vidal on meeting L Ron Hubbard
Skipper
BBICON
[cult crap]
^{critic crap}
Skipper
BBICON <BBI...@gmail.com> wrote:
^{idiot crap}
Barbara Schwarz
> In article <1180472310.436112.91...@x35g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> BBICON <BBI...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On May 29, 2:00 pm, Skipper <skipspaml...@charter.invalid> wrote:
> > [cult crap]
>
> > ^{critic crap}
>
> ^{idiot crap}
Skipper Babbles, you post:
{crappiest crapple crap-crap}
Exposing p$ychiatric agents and trolls:
if you are intelligent and think for yourself, they defame, libel, and
abuse you as being mentally ill. If you are not intelligent and don't
think for yourself but adopt their mentally retarded, narrow, false,
insecure, and hate filled opinions, they call you sane. - Thanks, I
rather be my own thinking person. -- Barbara Schwarz
And by the way: Wikipedia (Wikipiggi) lies.
antisectes
> Scientology had to pay the largest libel settlement in Canadian
> History!
>
> That was a GOOD start!
>
>
> http://www.lermanet.com/scientologynews/canada/toronto-manning-072195.htm
>
> July 21, 1995
>
> million against the Church of Scientology and Toronto lawyer Morris
>
> The unanimous judgment means former crown attorney Casey Hill, now an
> Ontario Court judge, can collect more than $1.45 million from the
> church and $150,000 from Manning.
>
well, since the crime cult leader obtained a record by Guiness this
year, perhaps we could obtain scientology another Guiness , due since
quite a long time?
roger
Android Cat
The decision by Supreme Court of Canada is extremely clear, to the point and
damning:
http://www3.sympatico.ca/jdorsay/hill_vs_cos/
Supreme Court of Canada, July 20, 1995, Hill v Church of Scientology.
http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/1995/1995rcs2-1130/1995rcs2-1130.html
"There seems to have been a continuing conscious effort on Scientology's
part to intensify and perpetuate its attack on Casey Hill without any regard
for the truth of its allegations."
"In summary, every aspect of this case demonstrates the very real and
persistent malice of Scientology. Their actions preceding the publication of
the libel, the circumstances of its publication and their subsequent actions
in relation to both the search warrant proceedings and this action amply
confirm and emphasize the insidious malice of Scientology."
"Scientology's behaviour throughout can only be characterized as recklessly
high-handed, supremely arrogant and contumacious. There seems to have been a
continuing conscious effort on Scientology's part to intensify and
perpetuate its attack on Casey Hill without any regard for the truth of its
allegations."
"Punitive damages may be awarded in situations where the defendant's
misconduct is so malicious, oppressive and high-handed that it offends the
court's sense of decency. Punitive damages bear no relation to what the
plaintiff should receive by way of compensation. Their aim is not to
compensate the plaintiff, but rather to punish the defendant. It is the
means by which the jury or judge expresses its outrage at the egregious
conduct of the defendant."
"There can be no doubt that the conduct of Scientology in the publication of
the injurious false statement pertaining to its "enemy" was malicious. Its
publication was carefully planned and carried out in a manner which ensured
its widest possible dissemination in the most damaging manner imaginable."
"Scientology's actions from the time of publication, throughout the trial,
and after the trial decision was rendered constituted a continuing attempt
at character assassination by means of a statement which it knew to be
false. It was such outrageous conduct that it cried out for the imposition
of punitive damages."
"In his reasons for granting the injunction, Carruthers J. stated that he
was forced to take that action because "no amount awarded on account of
punitive damages would have prevented or will prevent the Church of
Scientology from publishing defamatory statements about the plaintiff". Even
the injunction did not deter Scientology which moved to set it aside."
"However any lingering doubt on that score is resolved when Scientology's
persistent misconduct subsequent to the trial is considered."
"Further, the circumstances presented in this exceptional case demonstrate
that there was such insidious, pernicious and persistent malice that the
award for punitive damages cannot be said to be excessive."
Ontario Court of Appeal:
"Moreover, the conduct of Scientology after the verdict demonstrates that
the jury was right when it decided it ought to award punitive damages. That
conduct also demonstrates that the amount of the award was not too high."
--
Ron of that ilk.