Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

(KNT To You) They want "Free Speech for Goebbels," and "Hitler is Democratically chosen," Criminality the society can not handle - Also: "l. ron hubbard 'pulling in' attacks on 'Scientology'" - (not for Demonic creatures)

2 views
Skip to first unread message

To You

unread,
Jan 25, 2008, 2:32:17 AM1/25/08
to
('Firewall' for alt.religion.scientology,
allowing readers as follows:)

(For those with Intelligence Quotient above hundred -
that means, ability to correlate and differentiate
data of life, in a manner that could be measured as
being at least the usual or common ability to do so,
amongst the average of people)

(Not for those who want OTHERS to be "seen" and treated,
yes, who even want others to "see" themselves and let
themselves be treated, as genetically modified baboons
- baboons in this case regarded as such fictitious
animals as the first mentioned individuals want
also animals to be "seen" and treated,
as conglomerated chemical compounds similar to,
but only vastly more complex than, a steam engine)

(Not for Demonic creatures)

(Not for those who wish to be in the 'Safe Space' of
possibly the biggest Criminal Mind in the Universe,
nor for those wanting to establish 'Safe Points'
for this individual, known last as l. ron hubbard)

'

Criminality the society can not handle - "Free Speech for Goebbels,"
"Hitler is Democratically chosen"

25 January 2008

'The Critics' would want "Free Speech for Goebbels," they would
empower "a Hitler who is Democratically chosen."

'

'The Critics' are only PRETENDING to handle Criminality,

a type of Criminality ('Scientology') that the society
currently can not handle.

'

Now let's have a look at the 'Scientology' side:

According to the Criminal 'Scientology' doctrines "about Life,"

when someone is strongly attacked, then "that means 'he pulled
it in'."

And in this case, when 'Scientology' is very severely
attacked, then that means IN 'SCIENTOLOGY,'

in the fascistic, Criminal Mind of l. ron hubbard,
about the group that is attacked, it means, that

"they THEMSELVES pulled it in."

You see how such theories "benefit" the Criminal
Mind:

He beats someone up, or tricks someone to
lose all money,

and "the victim just 'pulled it in'."


Their technical term for that is "Motivator," which
is hard to grasp, as a word to choose for that
concept, but that's what they - the Criminal Mind
of l. ron hubbard, that is, and thus what they -
call it.

They are very serious about this - it is very widely and very
commonly used within 'Scientology,'

in order to deny the existence of Criminals
and Crime,

If you know only three words, "1.1" (adjective), "2D"
(noun) and "Motivator" (noun), and you use these
occasionally in your sentences, then you may have
a lively conversation going with a 'Scientologist.'

'

'

So what they do, the 'Scientologists,' now, is they start some "own"
soul searching - in the group, that is, so that means not searching
one's own soul, at all, but

'to find other souls (persons) WITHIN THE GROUP, in order to
blame these,'

(excluding the actual and main Criminal, of course,

- because THAT would solve all their problems, and
according to l. ron hubbard himself, Man needs
problems in order to do well -

so they do not locate l. ron hubbard as the one
'pulling in the attacks on them,'

but they find OTHERS within the group, and punish
those)

'for "pulling in" the severe attack on Scientology,'

or on 'Chanology' as the attackers call it, now.

_______________
I wrote earlier:

'

'

l. ron hubbard is Source of Evil - only by PRETENDING TO HELP, can he
hide that

24 January 2008

(Version 1.0.1)

'

This is pretty simple, anyone can understand and feel that:

l. ron hubbard is the Source of Evil,

and he can only hide that, by PRETENDING TO HELP.

'

It is not so difficult to see, that his statements are all pretense,
either.

'

'

By the way, many "Critics of Scientology" are ALSO sources of Evil,
who hide that equally, by PRETENDING TO HELP.

'

What they have in common with l. ron hubbard more practically, is,
that both

PRETEND to be interested in truth,

both proclaiming, that "they are the ones who deliver truth."

'

Yet most "critics" HATE truth, other than very selectively,
bits and pieces that won't expose themselves as being actually
sources of evil. I have mentioned names very specifically,
before.

'

Who HATES TRUTH most, is l. ron hubbard himself - and he will, like
his current 'Scientology' organization too - go to the utmost length
to

SUPPRESS truth and REPLACE truth with lies (including his
'Scientology' "Axioms" and including his '"Fundamentals" of
thought, and his "Doctorate" Course Lectures)

of course also about his ACTUAL history, about his ACTUAL
goals for you:

Total complete control of everybody he can lay his
nauseating hands on, and that forever if possible,

which of course INCLUDES TOTAL MIND CONTROL of his
followers, with the examples Tom Cruise and David
Miscavige being wholly Mind Controlled by l. ron
hubbard,

and of course his followers who HAVE BEEN
MADE - by means of 'Scientology "Study Tech",'

to swallow all the completely FALSE data
"about life," that is 'Scientology,'

indeed, hiding it by PRETENDING TO
UNCOVER truth.

'

And you know about the sociopathic personality, or about
Criminal Minds, that 'they have everything in reverse,'

- of course 'The Critics of Scientology' won't tell
you THAT either, just as the 'Scientologists'
will not divulge the truth

because THEY HATE TO EXPOSE Criminal Minds -

so Criminal Minds ACCUSE OTHERS OF EXERTING MIND CONTROL
(really!)

- especially when THEY are looked at by others -

and, they PRETEND 'TO UNDO MIND CONTROL' - really...

'

'

Indeed all the 'Scientologists', by promoting l. ron hubbard secretly
or openly, are Sources of Evil, too.

'

These characters all - 'Scientologists' AND their 'Critics,' do hate
truth - and they hide that hate for truth,

by PRETENDING to expose truth:

A PRETENSE that they of course HATE TO HAVE EXPOSED,

so you can guess how much they like me,

and you can know, thereby, how intense or deep their PRETENSE IS,
you can detect them, very easily,

by the level of true support that they give me.


'

________________
I wrote recently about 'The Critics' and the 'Scientologists:'


How Do I Make Someone Leave Scientology

20 January 2008

(Version 1.1.2)

'

Admit to yourself,

that you are desiring - or are made to desire - to be too lazy
or too stupid or plainly too evil (whichever applies to you)

to read the Human Rights Issues.

'

'

Explain to Scientologists (them), that truth is absolute,

as 'what actually happened, caused by whom and with what
intentions,'

and is NOT "whatever you make of it."

'

Tell the Scientologist, to keep that in mind, while asking:

Is there an EARLIER time [meaning, earlier than 'Scientology'
- earlier than their present life time, of course] that the
individual, currently known as l.ron hubbard, deceived you?

'

'

Explain to them again, that truth is absolute, and NOT "whatever you
make of it."

Tell them to keep that in mind, while asking:

'

(Do a 'past life remedy' like this)

1. 'Recall a time when the individual now known as l. ron hubbard, did
Implant

[did forcefully hypnotize you with the infliction of Pain and
Unconsciousness (-Energies) PLUS an intention to dominate,
to alter and to destroy you, and to make you dominate others
for him - a time that he Implanted]

you or another.'

2. 'Recall a person who has NOT Implanted you or others.'

Repeat 1. and then 2., etc. till they can face something essential of
the nature and activities of l. ron hubbard.

'

'

If all else fails, admit to (admit the actuality of) your own desire
(or, as inflicted on you 'as if it is your own' desire) for your own
stupidity or for bringing stupidity about in others,

admit it so as to then be able to remedy

- first the desire for yourself to be stupid, or admit
the desire 'to have others more stupid than yourself,'

- to then, after the desire for it has diminished, remedy
the stupidity itself.

'

I remind the reader again, that the Trinity of Science is demonstrably
composed of Love, Beauty and Truth.

KNT hrp&p

Copyright 2008 by KNT hrp&p
Copyright conditions as usual

Ron's Inspector's Inspector

unread,
Jan 25, 2008, 9:12:03 AM1/25/08
to
"To You" <ro...@local.host> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.01.25....@local.host...

> I remind the reader again, that the Trinity of Science is demonstrably
> composed of Love, Beauty and Truth.

No, it's not. It's composed of ham, egg and cheese.

0 new messages