On Monday, April 18, 2022 at 11:55:19 AM UTC-7, Michael wrote:
You are " ludicrous " ! And let me proof it to you in the 2 following points will make :
1. Am charged with PC 243 (e) ( 1)
Which spells :
"243 (e) (1) When a battery is committed against a spouse, a person with whom the defendant is cohabiting, a person who is the parent of the defendant’s child, former spouse, fiancé, or fiancée, or a person with whom the defendant currently has, or has previously had, a dating or engagement relationship, the battery is punishable by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars ($2,000), or by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. If probation is granted, or the execution or imposition of the sentence is suspended, it shall be a condition thereof that the defendant participate in, for no less than one year, and successfully complete, a batterer’s treatment program, as described in Section 1203.097, or if none is available, another appropriate counseling program designated by the court. However, this provision shall not be construed as requiring a city, a county, or a city and county to provide a new program or higher level of service as contemplated by Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution."
Correct?
In top of that ? VERY V. IMPORTANT is the fact that the charge of the above was done based on ''victim's " CITIZEN ARREST!!!
REGARDLESS OF THE FACT THAT LAW SPELLS THAT IN THE SIDE OF THE LAW NAMED SPECIAL PROVISIONS WHICH NOBODY PRETTY MUCH READS ( UNLESS YOU ARE A LAWYER , A COO, OR STUDENT OF LAW OR ACADEMY ) AND , V. IMPORTANT COURT RECORDS DO NOT EXPRESS THE FACT THAT ARREST WAS DONE BASED ON A CITIZEN ARREST !!! WHY ????
LET'S SEE WHAT SPECIAL PROVISIONS SAY :
b) Anytime a peace officer is called out on a domestic violence call, it shall be mandatory that the officer make a good faith effort to inform the victim of his or her right to make a citizen's arrest , unless the peace officer makes an arrest for a violation of paragraph (1)of subdivision (e) of Section 243 or 273.5. This information shall include advising the victim how to safely execute the arrest.
The most important part of the above paragraph is the word "UNLESS" !
SO WE DEDUCT FROM ABOVE CITED PC THE FACT THAT FOR THE CRIME PC 243(e) (1) and 273.5 YOU CANT ARREST ANYONE ON A CITIZENS ARREST WARRANT !
QUESTIONS ??? WITH REGARD TI MY STATEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT THE LAW SPELLS ??????
HUH? ANYONE CONTRADICTS ME ON THAT ?
COME UP ! ASK ME QUESTIONS ! WILL SMACK YOU OVER THE FACE WITH MY ANSWERS !
COME UP ! TELL ME I DONT UNDERSTAND F ENGLISH ! DARE YOU !
Let's go further :
We also know that an officer can not arrest for the crime of misdemeanor unless he witnessed the crime !
Show me what officer saw me commiting the f crime ? Which is not what am accused of anyway . So is irrelevant !
Am accused of 243e1 in a citizen arrest made by the "victim " which said as I posted in a recent post that he was high and asked me to have my lawyer calling him .
Now :
You are a foul a highly ludicrously one or a criminal ! ! Why?
For two reasons :
a) or you don't know the law ? Which makes you a total incompetent in order to occupy the position you hold , prosecuting others
Or
b) you know what the law spells and choose to be a criminal murderer rather than a prosecutor
Regardless which one you pick : a) or b) ? Both are equally bad and demands you to sit up and free the chair you occupy for the sake of the people and in the name of the sake of the people for God's sakes !
I WI REFRAIN FROM POSTING HERE WHAT LAW SPELLS WITH REGARD TO CRIMINAL RO TOLD I WAS ISSUED WHEN THE CHARGE PC 243 (e)(1) IS MISSING FROM THE FORM . IS IUSSUED FOR THE PC 273.5 WHICH IS NOT THE CASE HERE ! YET I WAS THROWING OUT OF MY HOME AND ARRESTED MILLION TIMES FOR BREAKING THAT PHONY INEXISTENT RO THAT I NEVER AHD A HEARING FOR IR WAS GIVEN A COPY OF , OR EVER SHOWNED TO ME BY ANY OF THE OFFICERS THAT ARRESTED ME MULTIPLE TIMES !!!!
NO2. DO YOU SEE MY CHARGE ???
THEN WTF YOU TALK ABOUT DRUGS FOR ? HUH?
NO3. YOU SAY AM A "KNOWN DRUG ADDICT ? "
THEN WHY THE FUCK YOU WANT TO SEAT WITH ME AT THE TABLE FOR ?
LET ME PROVIDE YOU WITH AN ANSWER...ANSWER THAT FULLY JUSTIFIES WHY AM CALLING YOU AM IDIOT! I TOLD YOU I DONT CALL PEOPLE NAMES BUT PROVIDE ACCURATE FEEDBACK!
HERE IS THE ANSWER :
BECAUSE AM INNOCENT !
YOU ALL KNOW IT !
THAT'S WHY YOU WANT TO SEAT AT THE TABLE WITH ME FOR !!!!
YOU WANT A MORE COMPLEX ANSWER ?
THERE YOU HAVE IT :
BECAUSE YOU NOT ONLY KNOW AM INNOCENT BUT YOU ALSO KNOW YOU ARE ALL CRIMINALS DISGUISED IN ROBES , UNIFORMS AND SUITS ! AND YOU FACE JAIL ! ALL OF YOU WITH ALL F IMMUNITY YOU DONT HAVE AS IS NOT PART OF YOUR JOB TO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST US, THE PEOPLE !!!
IF IT IS ?
I demand the job description that tells you to say so !
I will inquire with the board !
I don't need your answer on that !
And you continue make threats ?
Fuck you all criminals !
This is not name calling or slander but ACCURATE FEEDBACK !
YOU GOT THAT ?????
TAKE YOUR F. PHONY ACCUSATIONS OFF THAT POST WHERE YOU PUBLICLY DARE CONTINUE SLANDER !
You got that ????
YOU BETTER :
ALL OF YOU !