Art Bulla
John Manning
You're too stupid to bother replying to any
more, Bulla. It's a waste of time talking to
someone who lives entirely in his own
imaginary world, disconnected from reality.
At this point there's hardly anyone who
doesn't know that you're crackers.
DumberThanSnot
"John Manning" <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:7IWdnT4uY-q...@giganews.com...
John,
I've been gone from ARM for awhile... what ever happened to the Kim bro's?
are they still idiotically following the Bulla crack pot?
John Manning
I don't know for sure. Aaron hasn't been
around for a while. Jong has, but Bulla
recently 'rebuked' him. There's likely a
soap opera going on behind the scenes kinda
like Larry, Curly and Moe.
Art Bulla
FAITH: THE DOGS OF HATE
The Dogs of Hate have been tearing at people of faith since the cultural '
revolution of the 1960s. They've torn apart our courts and schools and are
now ripping apart the military and police. Snarling with utter viciousness
against our houses of worship, the Dogs of Hate have been unleashed by the
radical Left. And like the rabid canines that they are, this angry pack
won't back down until they've sunk their teeth into every believing person
to make them distrust the teachings of God. The anti-religious radical
left-wingers have ratcheted up their attacks s upon the moral underpinnings
of American society-our religious institutions and sacred symbols. At no
time in our history has their hatred for people of faith been more vicious
or more blatant. Do you think I'm making this up? I'll prove it to you in
this chapter. But first you should know that, from my perspective, I really
don't care if you choose to worship God, Buddha, Allah, the moon, or nothing
at all. That's your business. But hear this: Your constitutionally protected
right to worship as you wish, especially if you are Jewish
or Christian, is in jeopardy. If the intolerant Dogs of Hate have their way,
you will lose your right to speak about your faith in any meaningful
way-unless, of course, you're a Muslim. I'll explain why Muslims get a pass
in the next chapter. What's even more outrageous is how the irreligious Left
has tricked you into paying for their attack on your faith. Yes, religion is
under siege, and thanks to the cohopting of tax dollars, you're funding your
own crucifixion. As you'll see, the self-righteous phony high priests of
ultra-liberalism are relentless in their efforts to drive the Church out of
public life once and for all. How? By altering or eliminating religion from
history textbooks. By censoring the public display of the Ten Commandments.
By inflaming hostilities toward people of faith. By invading the leadership
of faith-based groups. By seeking to remove God from the Pledge of
Allegiance. By insulting, smearing, and desecrating religion and religious
symbols in the name of art. By rewriting religious restrictions on
homosexual activity. I can only pray that the American sheeple wake up to
that reality before it's too late. Whether or not you are a religious
person, any rational thinker will recognize that the free exercise of
religion is both a necessary and valuable institution for maintaining the
health of this nation. Our Founding Fathers understood this, contrary to
what the irreligious Left would have you believe. ENTER THE GAY BISHOP The
most insidious attack by these mad dogs has been their ambush of the clergy.
How? By rewriting religious restrictions on homosexual activity and by
convincing the sheeple that God has recently changed His mind on the
subject. FAITH: THE DOGS OF HATE On August 6, 2003, the irreligious Left
within the Episcopal Church voted to make "Reverend" Gene Robinson, a loud
and proud gay clergyman, the next bishop of New Hampshire. As news of the
vote surfaced, Episcopal churches across the country-and around the
world-braced themselves for the worst-and got it. The vote sent shockwaves
from Chicago to Canterbury. Within minutes of the final tally, the Anglican
community watched helplessly as their denomination headed for a split. The
conservative leadership, at least those who didn't resign in disgust,
immediately called upon the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, to
intervene. No other decision in recent history has caused such a schism
amongst the faithful. It's not just that Gene Robinson's sexuality is a
violation of all the teachings of the Bible. That's the least of the
problem. It's the man's egomania, which approaches that of a psychopath. To
selfishly elevate himself above the Church, to risk the split of his own
denomination, and to say that his sexuality is something that God is doing
as "a new thing;" is indicative of a pathological personality. Listen to
what this egomaniac said after his confirmation:
The whole notion of sexual orientation is quite a new one. It's only about a
hundred years old, and we can't take a modern day concept and plug it back
into an ancient text and pretend that's what those people knew and meant
when they wrote it. At the time of the writing of those scriptures, everyone
was presumed to be heterosexual, so to act in any other way was against
their nature. So what I would say is that Scripture simply does not address
what we're addressing today, which is faithful, monogamous, lifelong
intentioned relationships between people of the same gender.'
Let's look at his credibility as a student of history and of the Bible.
First, to suggest that the "concept" of sexual orientation is only a hundred
years old is nuts. Where did he get that? What about the rampant
homosexuality in Greece? In Rome? Or back in the days of Sodom and Gomorrah?
Second, to say "those people" presumed everyone to be heterosexual' doesn't
jibe with reality. Where did he get his theology degree? What Bible is he
talking about? While he's at it, why doesn't he just get a bottle of
white-out and change other parts of the sacred text he doesn't think are
contemporary enough? Do you see what's happening? This egomaniac is actually
saying he is greater than God and Abraham. This lost soul, and those who
defend him, have pushed God aside and inserted themselves in the role of the
Almighty. Third, I believe he's delusional. Robinson claims he was chosen
for this roll. He said, "It's been a long time in coming, it's not so much a
dream as a calling from God."2 He actually thinks God felt it necessary for
him to reinterpret the scriptures. This crackpot sees himself as a new
Luther of the sexual organ. He's attempting to create a new sexual
reformation of the Church. That's why he went on to say, "I believe God is
doing a new thing in terms of its [sic] inclusion of gay and lesbian people
in the church:' Which makes perfect sense if your "god" is located three
inches below your belt buckle. What's Gene's ultimate goal? He told Diane
Sawyer, "I suspect that before too very long, other denominations will
follow and welcome openly gay and lesbian people into leadership positions.
That's certainly my prayer."' In other words, he's the pioneer. He's the
Anointed One designated to stimulate gay leadership worldwide. This goes to
show you how demented he is. He suffers from a mental disease. As I've said,
extreme liberalism is not a philosophy; it is a mental disorder. At any
other time in history, this man would have been put into a mental
institution for these statements. Of course, instead of locking him up, the
leftist-run media puts him on the silver screen to gain a few pieces of
gold. America's favorite liberal Archbishop, Dezi Tutu, can't understand
what "all the fuss" is about. This fake thinks the gay bishop debate is no
big deal. Dezi said, "For us that doesn't make a difference, the sexual ori
entation:" Could that be why he's named Tutu? Or does his name describe his
garment? BEHIND CLOSED DOORS While Tutu and others like him can't understand
what the fuss over the gay bishop is, let me explain it this way. I host The
Savage Nation from a studio in a high-rise building overlooking the San
Fransicko Bay. It's got three elevators. A lot of old people live in the
same building. Here's my problem. The elevators have no ventilation. None
whatsoever. Why is that an issue, you ask? Because the old folks pass gas in
the elevator. They get out, you get in. I've got to go up twenty-five
stories, and some days my eyes are smarting so bad I've got to put a scarf
on my face. Here's the connection to the gay bishop story. Gene Robinson and
his ilk would argue that what happens "behind closed doors" is none of our
business. Out of sight, out of mind. What's the big deal if the Church
welcomes gays into leadership positions with open arms? After all, gay sex
done out of view doesn't affect us, so why should we care what two
consenting people want to do? That's where they're wrong. Bowel gas released
behind closed doors lingers in the air, poisoning those who come along
later. In the same way, the reckless "private" sexual practices of
homosexuals behind closed doors ultimately affects every one of us. You
think this illustration is a stretch? I don't know how else to help you
understand the nature of the lie that's at work here. I ask you, how many
billions of our tax dollars have been spent to deal with the AIDS mess over
the last decade? How many millions of our tax dollars are being spent right
now for supposed AIDS awareness and prevention? Don't tell me that sexual
activity of a certain kind doesn't affect all of us. It does. On April 18,
2003, the Washington Blade, a radical homosexual newspaper, ran a full-page
ad promoting what was supposed to be about prevention
but was nothing more than a gay dating service. The ad
asked, "Tired of the bar scene? Tired of phonies? Want to go beyond type?
COME AND MEET REAL MEN." Do you know who paid for the ad? You did. That's
your tax dollars at work. The Washington DC Department of Health used tax
dollars to run and promote the seminar which was billed as a "social
workshop" for bisexual and gay men to learn how to "deepen intimacy with fun
exercises:"' That's nothing more than a payoff to the lobby of the suicidal
militant pro-promiscuity crowd. Period. And we're surprised that the number
of gay and bisexual men diagnosed with HIV has risen three years in a row?
According to the Centers for Disease Control, this "private activity" has
created a 17.7 percent jump in new HIV cases since 1999 among gay/bi/tri
men.' As cases of infection go up, so will your taxes, in order to deal with
the fallout. That's a fact. That's not being homophobic. That's the
scientific reality. I don't care if the culture of death wants to "get it
on" behind closed doors. Their stench, like a black fog, is lingering in the
air, and we, as a nation, are gagging on the fumes. Now, Gene Robinson, this
psychopathic clergyman hiding behind his holy robes, wants the Church to add
its blessing. I'm telling you, the Dogs of Hate are using every trick in the
book to paganize our churches and rewrite our history. FROM PLYMOUTH ROCK TO
PLYMOUTH CROCK One of the favorite ploys, of the irreligious Left is to
write God out of the history books. They, with the aid of their
co-conspirators in education, seek to eliminate any and all references to
our religious heritage. Even though historical evidences of our
Judeo-Christian heritage, and the celebration of the Bible as a basis for
American law, abound. Here's one your history teacher left out of class.
Back when Rhode Island was a colony, instead of the inbreeding
ground for liberalism as it is today, their
citizenry crafted the Charter of 1683, which defined the worship of God as
one of their core values. Imagine trying to teach kids that God is a part of
American history in a public school where transgender studies in "Your Mommy
Used To Be a Daddy" are the rave. The liberal education establishment
doesn't want your kids to know that the "absolute laws" found in Scripture
as referred to in the Charter of 1683 became the basis for our Declaration
of Independence. I'll give you another one. Eighteen years after the
Pilgrims set foot on Plymouth Rock, they saw a need to train pastors for
future generations and decided to found the first American college. Harvard
College to be exact. I'm sure the idea of training God's teachers would give
fits to the trusthfund babies running Harvard today. Harvard's "Rules and
Precepts" adopted in 1646 required that "Every one shall so exercise himself
in reading the Scriptures twice a day that they be ready to give an account
of their proficiency therein." These days, any student openly reading a
Bible on Harvard's campus would be ridiculed and ostracized. As I said, the
signs of our Judeo-Christian national heritage are etched in concrete-for
now. Next time you visit the nation's capital, see for yourself. Stop by the
Washington Monument, the Jefferson Memorial, the Lincoln Memorial. Read the
inscriptions. They're replete with references to God and the Bible. Or stop
and see the Supremes in the Supreme Court building. There you'll find a copy
of the Ten Commandments hanging above the head of the chief justice and a
statue of Moses on the east front section. I'd suggest you plan that trip to
Washington DC before the Dogs of Hate have these national symbols expunged.
Does this seem redundant? I must counter the years of leftist brainwashing
that has programmed you to believe America does not have deep religious
roots. But the clipped-haired, hardhLeft czarinas of the National Education
Association suppress such knowledge in favor of sensitiiiivity training for
gender-obsessed adolescents. If Abraham Lincoln, John Quincy Adams, and
Calvin Coolidge were alive today, the Christophobic NEA would ram Ritalin
down their throats and march them off to reeducation camp. Just a few short
decades after the founding of America," Daniel Webster, a real statesman and
America's foremost advocate of nationalism during his day, felt compelled to
remind his contemporaries, "Our ancestors established their system of
government on morality and religious sentiment. Moral habits, they believed,
cannot safely be trusted on any other foundation than religious principle,
nor any government be secure which is not supported by moral habits."
Webster refused to lose sight of our moral bearings. He was a far better man
than the hollow statesmen of today, like Sen. John Kerry. Kerry, bursting
with all the charisma of a mortician, is a very liberal Catholic. Kerry had
the nerve to lecture Pope John Paul II over the Church's stance on gay
marriage, arguing the pontiff "crossed the line"8 when the Vatican called on
American politicians to thwart the legalization of homosexual marriage.
Rather than stand with Webster on the side of God and country and our
religious heritage, Kerry failed to exercise the good sense to support the
views of his own church. Kerry chafed, "It is important not to have the
church instructing politicians."9 Why not offer the same caution, Mr. Kerry,
about not having radical homosexual and lesbian groups instructing
politicians? Let's not get sidetracked by the arguments from the lefties who
like to muddy the waters by suggesting the Founders were not truly pious.
That's not the point. What matters is this: Our Founders placed a premium on
preserving the right for Americans to practice their own faith. Freely,
publicly, and without apology. They believed so much in the Ten Commandments
(of God) that they made them the cornerstone of our constitutional rights!
Try teaching this to the phony proponents of tolerance who crafted the
Pennsylvania Public School Code in such a way as to restrict a teacher's
right to religious self expression. The code prohibits teachers from wearing
personal religious symbols (such as a cross or a Star of David) unless
hidden from the view of the morally numb student body. On May 6, 2003,
Brenda Nichol, a teacher's aid at Penns Manor Area Elementary School,
learned her lesson the hard way. She dared to wear a one-inch cross and was
suspended for one year. A second violation would bring permanent expulsion
from teaching at that school. Thankfully, a federal judge had enough sense
to reverse the school's action." Make no mistake. First, the Dogs of Hate
snap the crosses from off of your necklaces. Then they snap off the crosses
from the war memorials of the men and women who died to preserve the freedom
of religion. What's next? Maybe these unhappy pagans will decide that the
Torah is too "exclusionist" and outlaw the core of Judaism. Benjamin
Franklin hit the nail on the head when he asked, "If men are so wicked with
religion, what would they be without it?"" I'll answer that one: They'd be
exactly like what we're seeing in the bathhouses of San Fransicko. A lost
and hedonistic people undistracted by a moral compass. A people who
routinely engage in high risk, indiscriminate sexual practices with
multiple, and often HIV-infected, anonymous partners even when they know
such insane behavior is suicidal. A people so confused and so militant, they
not only want the freedom to act recklessly, they demand silence from any
and all who would dare question the morality or health consequences of such
activity. If you hold personal convictions about faith, these players in a
real-life "satyricon" and their RDDB compadres believe it's you or them.
Your very existence is a threat to their way of life. They've abandoned
their sixties credo: Live and let live. Instead, they've twisted it to be:
We live, and your beliefs die. Die to the notion of right and wrong, good
and evil, the high road and the low road. That's why today's anarchists of
the soul have spent the better part of forty years vilifying, undermining,
discrediting, marginalizing, and silencing the voices of faith. These
Christophobes are rewriting American history.
The last thing they want you to know is the truth about our Founding
Fathers-excuse me, our "Forepersons."
For those readers who may have skipped history class to score a joint in the
back of the parking lot, I'll show you why and how these Dogs of Hate are
working overtime to systematically silence religion. ' RELIGION-FREE ZONES
When I was a kid in religious school, I was more inclined to sit with my
friends in the back of the classroom than in the front paying attention to
the Bible. To me, at the time, religion wasn't important. It was all mumbo
jumbo. I didn't take it seriously. I have since come to understand the true
presence of God and the meaning of His teachings. However, I'm afraid there
are tens of millions of people in our country who are still like that kid in
the back of the religious school, thinking religious studies are all a big
joke. One winter day, we were especially bored as the teacher droned on and
on and on. The room was stuffy from the piped-in heat. His hot air wasn't
helping matters, either. I remember we were rapidly approaching narcolepsy
from the boredom. You couldn't pay me to stay awake in that class. I should
mention that my best friend Joe was another jokester. He and I were always
getting summoned to the front of the classroom because we wouldn't pay
attention. This particular afternoon, Jokester Joe secretly tore up tissue
paper into hundreds of little pieces. As I glanced over in his direction, I
couldn't figure out what he was trying to do. His hands worked like crazy
under the desk, ripping the paper, while his eyes looked straight ahead.
Throughout the room there were vents with forced hot air blasting heat up
from the floor. There was also one strategically located at the front of the
class, just under the blackboard and beside the teacher. All of a sudden, as
the teacher turned his back to write on the chalkboard, Jokester Joe took
this shredded mountain of tissue paper and threw them over the hot air vent.
He shouted out, "Look teacher, it's snowing in here:'
We thought it was a hysterically funny scene. The truth is, it made a
mockery of the teacher. It made a mockery of authority, of structure, and of
the religion class. Everything the school was holding up as sacred was
dismissed in a moment of anarchy. For those few seconds, we thought we had
tasted freedom.
I realize it was just a mild prank that didn't really hurt anybody. But I'm
afraid we have millions of people who, like Jokester Joe, are throwing r t
torn up sheets of tissue paper trying to obscure the Word of God. While the
innocent jokesters like Joe are not a real threat, there are others today ka
who are far more dangerous, far more malicious, far more militant. t; These
empty souls have a clear agenda to destroy the meaning of the `word "God,"
our houses of worship, and the practice of true religion. For
these people, it's not sufficient to obscure the Word of God with mere
,`pranks, their goal is to obliterate it altogether. f. Take Patsy Ireland,
the former head of the National Organization for
Women. Patsy was appointed CEO of the Young Woman's Christian }"Association.
This bisexual, pro-abortion feminist, who managed to pene trate the YWCA,
likes to pretend she's pure and holy, but in reality she's
making a mockery of everything that this religious institution represented
;for 145 years.
for starters, today's crop of impressionable young girls might have ,,yen
led to believe that bisexuality is a good thing. Why not? Top-dog
Patsy Ireland has both a husband and a girlfriend. I'm sure in time she
might have offered'a new class on the joys of the bi-polar life. Who knows,
)naybe she would have ordered new YWCA stationary without the "C" and
;;;tell those who don't like it to just "get over it"-a favorite phrase she
uses to deflect criticism of her bulldozer policies.
This dangerous radical was working from within to co-opt the 'YWCA's
policies and values and, in turn, shape them with her perverted ;'worldview.
I say she "was working" because after just six months at the .` helm, she
was asked to resign. The board of directors saw the light (or per
haps the heat) and felt the YWCA "proved to be the wrong platform for her to
advocate on these issues?"12 Patsy refused. That's when they dismissed her
before she could further tarnish the YWCA's once stellar legacy. Or take the
case of Teresa Becker. In 2000, Teresa enrolled in Ave Maria College, a
Catholic liberal arts college in Michigan. Her freshman year she received
$1,200 in state scholarship funds. Her sophomore year, the state provided
$2,750 in aid and was promised the same for her junior year. That is, until
she declared her major: theology. Once the mad Dogs of Hate noticed her
choice of studies, they dashed off this note to her: "Students enrolled in a
course of study leading to a degree in theology, divinity or religious
education are not eligible to receive an award. Your award has changed from
$2,750.00 to $0.00:'13 She's not alone. To date, eleven other states have
eliminated scholarships for students whose major of choice is theology. You
can study to be a porn star.
You can study to be an eco-terrorist.
You can study to be an illegal alien activist. But God forbid you chose to
study theology. Why do you think the agents of liberalism, who for the most
part are aligned with the Demoncat party, view the Judeo-Christian faith as
public enemy number one? Why do they ban traditional Christmas carols,
which, admittedly, have a Christian message, during the "Winter Holiday"
choral performance in public schools? Contrary to the biblical notion of one
God, in the worldview of ultraliberalism each person is his or her own God!
Plain and simple. You might want to read that again. Look at it this way.
Divide the country into the red and the blue, the Republicans and the
Democrats. By and large you will find that Republicans come from a stronger
relationship to the Judeo-Christian doctrine of monotheism, or one God. I'm
not saying this holds across the board. But for the most part they believe
in a Supreme Being to whom they are accountable. The Dems, especially the
more vocal ones like the Hollywood Idiots, are more Hellenistic. These
modern day Hellenists are deluded by their popularity, by their red carpet
treatment, by their reserved seating, and by virtue of the fact that they
actually believe they are more enlightened than the American sheeple. They
are God, and there can be none other before them. In other words,
ultra-liberalism is based upon a belief system steeped in self-worship, or
idolatry. Which is why most actors are Democrats. Because they're
Hellenists; they think they're God. That also explains why I don't know of
one Red Diaper Doper Baby in the ACLU who is a registered Republican. To
them, the idea of absolute truth and being accountable to a Supreme
Authority is laughable. Occasionally you'll see an actor or lawyer with a
tinge of humility, who understands his or her place in the, world. Against
the odds, they understand that this is one nation under God-unlike the vast
majority of chronic rehab cases who think America is one nation under them.
They're demi-gods. In true demi-god fashion, these egomaniacs proclaim that
we must save the "environment" by driving a "hybrid" car while they are
chauffeured in a limo. Anybody who doesn't bow down at the altar of their
ego gets a thousand tongue-lashings. While we run around trying to placate
the demi-gods among us, they're busy mocking people of true faith, ripping
the Ten Commandments off the wall and censoring religious symbolism. THE BIG
TEN In spite of the aggressive efforts by the secular humanists to de-God
public schools and society at large, I believe God and religion are
absolutely necessary for a child's development. At the very minimum, you've
got to teach a child the Ten Commandments. You've got to show them right
from wrong. You've got to instill in them a standard of civility and
appropriate behavior. This is what the Ten Commandments offer.
A standard to live by. A moral compass to guide each generation. This seems
so obvious, yet our educational system refuses to acknowledge the need for
such a standard. Instead, they argue that to teach right and wrong is
"moralizing"-which it is. What's wrong with that? We could use a little
moralizing. As you well know, not all choices are equal. Some choices are
better than other choices. A moral compass would help students stay on the
straight and narrow. But the teachers' union and liberal establishment
reject that. What have decades of such negligence brought us? Look no
further than the brutal hazing incident at an affluent suburban Chicago high
school, May 4, 2003. Remember that one? A dozen girls and three boys, all
seniors who should have known better, smeared feces, garbage, and paint on
each other. They smeared feces while the cameras rolled. The whole nasty
business was like a scene from Lord of the Flies. Several students were
captured on videotape repeatedly beating a group of junior class girls. Five
kids ended up in the hospital as a result of the horrible acts of brutality.
Why are we surprised? During their entire school experience, the device of
the Left was to de-vice evil while turning the saints into sinners. But
that's not the worst of it. The school officials suspended their leftist
tendencies long enough to suspend the students who were responsible for the
torture they inflicted on fellow students. But then, amazingly, several of
the parents of the students involved filed a lawsuit to get the charges
dropped. Why? They didn't want there to be a black mark on their kids'
records when they applied for college. First, the negligent parents failed
to teach their kids basic decency or moral constraints at home. And they
didn't insist at minimum that the school instruct students to maintain a
sense of morality. Then, when their kids got caught smearing feces on their
friends and pummeling them, they've got the nerve to sue for damages. Only
in Hellenistic America.
To be perfectly redundant, liberalism is a mental disorder. This is a
classic example of what intolerance for the Ten Commandments brings. This
crop of delinquents were caught on tape committing a crime. They ought to
take the punishment. End of story. Now, I realize there are those of you who
don't believe in God. What if we took out the first commandment which says,
"I am the Lord your God ... you shall have no other gods before me" (Exodus
20:2-3). Tell me, which of the other nine commandments do you find
unacceptable? "Honor your father and your mother"? How about "You shall not
murder," "You shall not steal,' or "You shall not give false testimony
against your neighbor"? Which one of them do you think would not be a good
guideline for a child? I don't know which one it is. Let's say for the sake
of argument that you want to throw the whole thing out. Answer this. What
gives you, your children, and our society a basis for the concepts of right
and wrong? The law? Wake up, my friend. American law is based on the
principles of the Ten Commandments. That's why a copy hangs over the heads
of the Supreme Court justicesnot that they've noticed recently. And another
thing.
As I've studied the teachings in the Bible, I've come up with only one
conclusion: God is a conservative. Think about it. This is why liberals tend
t' to deny His existence. Don't you understand the logic of what I just said
to you? God is a conservative by definition because everything that is of a
conservative nature or value emanates fundamentally from God's laws as
presented in the Bible. The radical irreligious Left not only dismisses
God's laws as unworthy of mankind; they claim God doesn't exist. Their
egocentric position suggests the Bible is a collection of myths, and so, in
turn, they embrace the religion of secular humanism where man replaces God
and the State replaces the Church. Which is actually nothing more than the
rebirth of Marxism, communism, or Leninism, depending on the likes of the
leftist. Are you beginning to understand how they operate?
SO HELP ME, GOD Of course, once the libs toss the Big Ten out the window,
they've effectively canned truth as the basis for law and order. Which
creates a problem for the courts. Truth, as we learned from eight torturous
years under Bill Clinton, is in the eye of the beholder. How else could that
egomaniac place his hand on a Bible and swear to tell the truth? That's what
you get after the Dogs of Hate have gnawed away the very foundation of
justice. A man's testimony can no longer be trusted. Yes, the time is
rapidly approaching when our courts may have to resort to an old tribal
custom in order to validate the testimony of a witness. Now, you should know
that I'm a man who loves to study the genesis of words. This will astonish
you. Take the origin of the word "testimony." If you break it down,
"testimony" goes back to the word "testify" which, in turn, has at its Latin
root the word "testis." What other English word derives its meaning from
testis? Testicle. The reproductive gland of a male. Here's where it gets
fascinating. When I was collecting medicinal plants in the South Pacific
(1969-1989), I met a professor who went into the mountains of New Guinea in
1948 to do anti-malaria research. When he arrived, he learned about a
peculiar custom that the primitive tribe embraced. When you approached them
to speak, their leader would cup your testicles in his hand! That's just the
way the men greeted each other. When they talked, they would put their hands
on the other guy's testicles. This is not a lewd tale. The fact of the
matter is they did this to see if the man was lying or not. Because,
apparently, if a man lies, something happens down there. Know what I'm
saying? I guess the family jewels would shrink up if he was being
untruthful. I don't know exactly how it worked. But it worked. Naturally, my
friend didn't want anyone touching his privates. When he first experienced
this treatment, he wondered if they were nuts. But he had to go along with
the program. So that's where the word "testimony" comes from. I say that's
where we are headed if the libs succeed in killing the Commandments. Come to
think of it in this era of secular humanism, maybe we'd be better off if, in
a court of law, instead of putting your hand on the Bible, we did it the old
fashioned way.
These days, we'd probably get more truth out of people. INSIDE JOB While the
public schools hang leper bells around the neck of religion, there's an
enemy lurking within our houses of worship co-opting the very core of faith.
I'll give you two prominent examples. Take the sad state of liberal Judaism.
I'm just calling it as I see it. What else would you say when a leftist
rabbi goes and joins a lawsuit to ban the public display of the Ten
Commandments? This so-called rabbi, a phony in holy robes who will remain
nameless, joined the rabid mad dogs of the ACLU and five demented,
antireligious "Christian" slime bags to knock off the Ten Commandments from
the state capitol grounds in Frankfort, Kentucky. They claimed that the
display of the decades-old granite monument was unconstitutional.
4
I say shame on you, Rabbi Pinhead. " Why on earth would you fight for the
removal of a piece of your own history? Thanks in part to the coercive
efforts by this enemy of the faith, a federal judge prohibited the placement
of the Ten Commandments. On appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the
request to hear the case to reverse the lower court's decision."
Big surprise there. In other words, the U.S. Supreme Court has now said,
"Drop dead, Ten Commandments." And a rabbi, playing the part of Judas,
wasted no time betraying his own religious text. This rabbi should be
defrocked. While we're at it, the Supremes who ruled against the Big Ten
should be exposed for the judicial tyrants they are.
I ask you, why is it permissible for a copy of the Commandments to hang in
the halls of the high court in Washington DC but barred from the state
capitol of Kentucky? Whoever said "Justice is blind" sure got it right. The
Supremes are so blind, I must remind them that the author of the First
Amendment, James Madison, argued vigorously on behalf of the Commandments.
Madison said, "We have staked the whole future of all of our political
institutions ... upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern
ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves, according to the Ten
Commandments of God :'15 Did you get that? The Establishment and Free
Exercise Clause does not require the obliteration of all our religious
traditions. It's a sad day in America when a rabbi betrays his high calling
and tramples on the Ten Commandments in his race to be perceived as tolerant
by the neo-pagan Left. The other outrageous heartbreaker comes from
Georgetown University, once a great Jesuit school of higher learning.
Leftists of the middle order of deceit have invaded those once sacred halls
and unleashed the mad Dogs of Hate. Case in point. Cardinal Francis Arinze
is a well-respected Catholic cleric from Nigeria. Some suggest he's a
possible successor to the pope. He was invited by this Catholic institution
to address the seniors at their spring 2003 graduation ceremony. I'm sure
the dean of students figured having an African-African would show
sensitivity to cross-cultural, international solidarity. He's a good man.
Now, had the Right Reverend Jessie Hi-Jackson been invited to speak, you'd
expect a tirade about rape-R-nations, affirmative racism, and
multi-culti-transgender equality. Maybe they figured Cardinal Arinze would
deliver the same kind of canned speech. Within minutes of his opening
comments, the faculty found out how mistaken they had been. I can only
imagine the looks of shock, embarrassment, and rage on the faces of the
faculty members responsible for giving him the platform as he barbequed more
than a few of their sacred cows. It's amazing they didn't unplug his
microphone. His message? Cardinal Arinze, a devout conservative Catholic who
isn't trying to score points with the liberal establishment, gave them the
ultimate tongue-lashing. He said, "In many parts of the world, the family is
under siege. It is scorned and banalized by pornography, desecrated by
fornication and adultery, mocked by homosexuality, sabotaged by irregular
unions, and cut in two by divorce?"16 At that point in his passionate
address, a female theology prof, who has no business teaching at a Catholic
university, stomped off stage. Her radical secularist feathers were ruffled
by a dose of genuine Catholic doctrine. This snake wasn't alone. A cadre of
other equally offended dunces slithered out. In the aftermath, Jane
McAuliffe, dean of the College of Arts and Sciences, dashed off a letter of
apology to placate the school's sizable gay contingent known as GU Pride.
Let me get this straight. A Catholic priest states the fundamental truths
found in any Catholic catechism and the Enemy Within a Catholic university
walks out? And the dimwitted dean apologizes? At the beginning of this
chapter I told you that the high priests of ultra-liberalism are relentless
in their efforts to drive the Church out of the public square. The truth is,
I didn't go far enough. They're driving God out of the Church. Do you see
what's happening? If this trend keeps up at so-called religious
institutions, watch out. One day you'll send your daughter (that little
darling you used to put into snow pajamas) off to Georgetown U., and a year
later she'll come home with a nipple ring and a butch cut. Perhaps, to
experience her inner-self, she'll have slept with the entire sorority!
This just shows you what we're facing in America. The mental disease of
liberalism is invading our churches', our liberal synagogues', and, to a
large extent, our faith-based colleges. Priests and pastors are afraid to
mention the word "God:' How often do you hear God's name anymore in liberal
religious colleges and houses of worship? They're afraid to mention His
name. It's like a pornographic phrase to speak the name of God. Why? Thanks
to the relentless attack of the Dogs of Hate, our houses of worship are no
longer about God. They're about saving chickens-not babies-and they're about
social work, gay rights, antihwar movements, and sending SUVs to the
crusher. WHERE THE SHROUD OF TURIN MEETS THE ROAD Do you remember the "What
Would Jesus Drive?" ad campaign cohsponsored by the ultra-farhLeft National
Council of Churches? This socialist front group launched a misguided attempt
to steer you away from owning a SUV Talk about a bogus non-issue. Get this.
The NCC opposed the liberation of Iraqis from torture chambers and mass
rape, but they sure got up in arms over the gas consumption of SUVs! The
anti-SUV drive revved into high gear when these liberal phonies tried to
link your choice of vehicle to world terrorism." t In the late 1990s, a move
by liberals within the religious publishing industry worked to create a
"gender neutral" edition of the popular New International Version of the
Bible-arguably the most widely used version of Scripture in churches today.
After an overwhelming backlash by religious leaders in 1997, the
International Bible Society and Zondervan Publishers inked an agreement with
leading evangelicals to placate the concerns about a politically corrected
edition. However, Zondervan disregarded their commitment and, in the spring
of 2002, released a politically sensitive, gender inclusive New Testament
called Today's NIV. The complete alteration of the Old Testament is expected
in 2005. The move triggered alarms by conservatives in the Church who
contend this is nothing more than a bow to the agenda of feminism.
In Orthodox synagogues, religious Jews continue to read the Torah without
alteration. How long will it be until the radical Left seeks to alter Torah
scrolls?
Forget about Saddam's slaughter of innocent men, women, and children. Forget
about the torture chambers. The Rev. Dr. Robert Edgar, general secretary of
the National Council of Churches wants you to believe it's your SUV that's
really killing people and, by God, the leftist loonies at the Council want
you stopped. This insanity is what happens when God takes a backseat to
fashionable liberal causes. Instead of addressing the poor, the needy, the
homeless, the widows, and the orphans, the Council spends its time and vast
sums of money to ban SUVs. .The ignorance of this misguided campaign is
astounding. Jesus was a carpenter, right? It stands to reason if Jesus were
living in America today, he'd drive a 4x4 Chevy Avalanche pickup truck. Then
again, with twelve disciples to cart around, he'd need two Suburbans-or two
Hummers. In the wake of this idiotic effort by the NCC, and in the interest
of being multi-cultural, a cartoonist in Florida raised the question which
the NCC failed to ask: "What Would Mohammed Drive?" His answer? A Ryder
truck. "The Enemy Within"; Michael Savage.
"John Manning" <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:7IWdnT4uY-q...@giganews.com...
>
>
Art Bulla
more elegant way of putting it is:
33 Wo unto the uncircumcised of heart, for a knowledge of their iniquities
shall smite them at the last day.
34 Wo unto the liar, for he shall be thrust down to hell.
(2 Ne 9:33-34)
Call me stupid to my face you pagan queer and I'll knock you o on your ass.
--
"I just tell em the truth, and they think it's hell." Harry Truman
Concerning quotes (out of context): these are distortions, taken out of the
context of
the blasphemies and insults placed upon me by the vilest of traitors and
foul wretches
imagineable. Jesus kicked their asses out of the Temple and I do the same to
all god damned liars and hypocrites. I make no apology. God is my judge. If
this fellow (Manning) were honest he would include these, and all would see
that I am
justified by the Lord in my responses. The word of the Lord is given on
the matter in the following:
Verily, if a man be called of my Father, as was Aaron, by mine own voice,
and by the voice of him that sent me, and I have endowed him with the keys
of the power of this priesthood, if he do anything in my name, and according
to my law and by my word, he will not commit sin, and I will justify him.
Let no one, therefore, set on my servant for I will justify him. saith the
Lord your God.
THE GOLDEN RULE OF DISINFORMERS:
Always accuse your adversary of whatever is true about yourself.
"Nothing has more retarded the advancement of learning than the disposition
of vulgar minds to ridicule and vilify what they do not understand."
Dr.Samuel Johnson.
The Revelations of Jesus Christ:
<http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?isbn=0-595-28287-3>
Discourses of Brigham Young, Pg.68
As it has always been, and will be yet for some time, when the sons
of God assemble together Satan will be on hand as an accuser of the
brethren, to find fault with those who are trying to do good.
"But we ask, does it remain for a people who never had faith enough to call
down one scrap of revelation from heaven, and for all they have now are
indebted
to the faith of another people...does it remain for them to say how much God
has
spoken and how much He has not spoken?" Joseph Smith
"Every generation has flattered itself that it is a little better than the
one that preceded it. Every generation has prided itself in its knowledge
and great advancement in the arts and sciences and its superiority over
preceding generations; yet the power of the adversary and his hatred of
righteousness and truth are as great to-day as they ever were since the
creation of the earth." Journal of Discourses, Vol.11, Pg.228 - Pg.229,
George Q. Cannon, May 6, 1866
"Some men are natural born saints; whenever a principle is advanced they
understand it, and drink it in; * * * while there are others who do not
understand and oppose every principle that is not clear to their mind. This
can be accounted for, that we are not all pure blooded, for Ephraim became
foolish and mixed up with the gentiles. When we find the pure blood of
Ephraim, we find a natural born child of God and there is nothing in the
gospel that is objectionable to them, but the others have to exercise faith
in God and humble themselves before Him and live for it." (Deseret Weekly,
50:250-251)
35 And the rebellious shall be cut off out of the land of Zion, and shall
be sent away, and shall not inherit the land.
36 For, verily I say that the rebellious are not of the blood of Ephraim,
wherefore they shall be plucked out.
(Doctrine and Covenants | Section 64:35 - 36)
"John Manning" <jrob...@terra.com.br> wrote in message
news:7IWdnT4uY-q...@giganews.com...
>
>
William Kimbler
"Art Bulla" <a...@artbulla.com> wrote in message
news:3uupvdF...@individual.net...
> You're too stupid to realize where you stand, you pagan bastard, but the
> more elegant way of putting it is:
>
> 33 Wo unto the uncircumcised of heart, for a knowledge of their iniquities
> shall smite them at the last day.
> 34 Wo unto the liar, for he shall be thrust down to hell.
>
> (2 Ne 9:33-34)
>
>
> Call me stupid to my face you pagan queer and I'll knock you o on your
> ass.
>
That's funny! If I remember correctly, I already have called you a queer,
and a liar both, and you ran away crying like the little bitch boy you are.
In fact, you my little bitch from this day forward, you got that bitch-boy.
I think you need to tell everyone why you threaten people and back down like
a bitch when someone stands up to.
Are you going to let your followers see what a coward you really are, if I
were one of your followers I would hide my head in shame. So tell us
bitch-boy did you ever find the verse in the bible where Moses personally
killed any homosexuals, or are you willing to admit that this is just a mere
speculation based on one verse. I agree that homosexuals were put to death,
but it didn't say who were the ones that carried out this job.
Until next time bitch boy have a good day.
Art Bulla
Piss ant distraction be gone
An army not stop its charge,
because of a barking dog.
A race horse does not bolt through the in field,
because of a flea.
A eagle does not change its path,
because a fly is buzzing in his ear.
Go bother someone else.
Not unlike the fly,
you seem to be irresistibly
attracted to sh*t.
SHOO FLY!!
"William Kimbler" <w.ki...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:qfxif.802$to5.620@trnddc04...
William Kimbler
> Not unlike the fly,
> you seem to be irresistibly
> attracted to sh*t.
> SHOO FLY!!
>
>
Well you said it best, must be why I am attracted to you because you are
shit, no go change you panties bitch boy.
William Kimbler
> Call me a liar to my face you ankle-biting arrogant asshole and I'll
> knock you on your ass.
Very well, I now say to your face you're a LIAR, A FAKE and a HYPOCRIT OF
THE WORST SORT.
Now come on and kick my ass, and you will see what this ex military man will
do to a sissy boy like you. You can email me you phone number and I will
personally call you and tell you where I live so you can come out here. I
doubt you will because you have already backed down to one challenge, and
people like you come a dime a dozen, the real problem is I am looking for
the person that's supplying the dimes. Therefore, you can curse me or
whatever you want, as I said I doubt you will even attempt it, simply
because you're all talk, hell it wouldn't surprise me that you are a
bitch-boy to some blow up doll. Provided you could even get one to date you.
So what do say Art you want to back up your threat? No cops, just you and I
one on one, till the first one cries mercy. BRING IT ON BITCH-BOY. I'll
even let you have the first two hits because you're going to need them.
You have talked then talk, now can you walk the walk? I'm eagerly awaiting
your reply.
DumberThanSnot
last week in the desert. But, just like every Bulla I've ever known (I've
only known of Art)... my dog "Bulla" got the poop kicked out of him.
BTW: funny story about that... someone asked me about my dog's name.
they said they've never heard of a "Bulla" before and wanted to know what it
was or what it meant. I said, Bulla as a noun is something akin to a bag
full of hot stinking air that has a nasty condition of expelling said gas at
the most inappropriate of times... like when someone is having a
comprehensive conversation between two intelligent people when all of a
sudden a Bulla enters the room and forces an evacuation resulting from the
stench of noxious gases. Bulla as and verb is akin to a nasty action such
as, "oops... sorry... I just Bulla'd". They asked why I named my dog after
something so foul... I said, "Have you ever seen how Bulla likes to pick
fights with incredible amounts of barking and snarling to support his
obviously yellow spine, then runs away just as the other dog turns around...
well, there ya have it... besides... have you ever smelled my dog after
expelling some gas? It makes me want to wrap my arms around a toilet and
Bulla"
"Art Bulla" <a...@artbulla.com> wrote in message
news:3uup1tF...@individual.net...
Art Bulla
facts and the truth. I am sorry that offends the wicked, but it is not my
fault, but yours.
2 Ne 33:5
5 And it speaketh harshly against sin, according to the plainness of the
truth; wherefore, no man will be angry at the words which I have written
save he shall be of the spirit of the devil.
"Men who have no principle of . truth, do not understand the word of truth
when they hear it. The devil taketh away the word of truth out of their
hearts, BECAUSE THERE IS NO DESIRE FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS IN THEM" (Teachings of
the Prophet Joseph Smith, sel. Joseph Fielding Smith [1976], 96).
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should
believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had
pleasure in unrighteousness.
(2 Thes 2:11-12)
news:XIPif.718$TI4.534@trnddc02...
Art Bulla
tasted freedom.
;for 145 years.
in Hellenistic America.
thing.
fashioned way.
4
scrolls?
news:WcQif.6765$6e5.1972@trnddc09...
William Kimbler
bigger ego than Jesus.
"Come on! ye prosecutors! ye false swearers! All hell, boil over! Ye burning
mountains, roll down your lava! for I will come out on top at last. I have
more to boast of than ever any man had. I am the only man that has ever been
able to keep a whole church together since the days of Adam. A large
majority of the whole have stood by me. Neither Paul, John, Peter, nor Jesus
ever did it. I boast that no man ever did such a work as I. The followers of
Jesus ran away from Him; but the Latter-day Saints never ran away from me
yet...When they can get rid of me, the devil will also go." (History of the
Church, Vol. 6, p. 408, 409)
- Joseph Smith: founder, prophet, seer, and revelator of The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
William Kimbler
that aren't afraid to stand up to you. Are you afraid that your followers
might start thinking "hey Art has no power; we should ditch him and find the
real truth". Afraid of being exposed for the Liar and hypocrite you really
are.
You know what I think; I think you don't like it when a person who has real
power can see right through your charades. So deal with it Art, Curse me,
send your demons after me. I am here to expose you, and make your life a
living hell on here.
So when do you think you'll come kick my ass, I will personally make sure I
am off work just for you.
See below how this (giggle)so-called man of false gods threatens people and
then runs away like a coward when challenged. So don't be afraid of Art,
just remember he has mistaken his medicine for some crack cocaine.