Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

law of witnesses

3 views
Skip to first unread message

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 22, 2013, 7:13:18 PM5/22/13
to

http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of

The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of two or
three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15; 2 Cor.
13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one another
(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multiple
witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The law of
witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the reality
of, an event. To "witness" in the scriptural sense is much the same as
in the legal sense: to give personal testimony based on firsthand
evidence or experience. To bear false witness is a very serious
offense (Deut. 5:20;19:16-21). When prophets have an experience with
the Lord, often he commands them to "bear record" of him and of the
truths that have been revealed (1 Ne. 10:10;11:7; D&C
58:59;112:4;138:60). In legal affairs, testimony is usually related to
what a person knows by the physical senses. In spiritual matters there
is additional knowledge or information received through the Holy
Spirit.

The Bible illustrates that God often works with mankind through two or
more witnesses (Num. 35:30; Deut. 17:6;19:15; Matt. 18:15-16).
Likewise, latter-day scripture teaches the need for witnesses (D&C
6:28;42:80-81;128:3). One person's word alone, even though it may be
true, may not be sufficient to establish and bind the hearer to the
truth. Witnesses provide the means of establishing faith in the minds
of people, for faith comes by hearing the word of God through the
power of human testimony accompanied by the Holy Ghost (Rom. 10:17;
TPJS, p. 148; Lectures on Faith, 2)

ON JUDGMENT DAY. In the final judgment that God will render to all
mankind, the fact of the gospel having been taught on the earth by
multiple witnesses will be important

Good Morning

unread,
May 23, 2013, 9:11:04 AM5/23/13
to
In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
A Really Really Large Number says...
>
>
>http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>
>The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of two or
>three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15; 2 Cor.
>13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
>relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one another
>(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multiple
>witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The law of
>witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Church of
>Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>
>A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the reality
>of, an event. ...

So, who was the second witness
of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 23, 2013, 10:09:45 AM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 9:11 am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups.com>,
Nonessential.
He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming to at
that point.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 23, 2013, 10:12:08 AM5/23/13
to
On May 22, 7:13 pm, A Really Really Large Number <quarke...@gmail.com>
wrote:
https://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/introduction?lang=eng#

The Book of Mormon is a volume of holy scripture comparable to the
Bible. It is a record of God’s dealings with ancient inhabitants of
the Americas and contains the fulness of the everlasting gospel.

The book was written by many ancient prophets by the spirit of
prophecy and revelation. Their words, written on gold plates, were
quoted and abridged by a prophet-historian named Mormon

The crowning event recorded in the Book of Mormon is the personal
ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ among the Nephites soon after His
resurrection.

In due course the plates were delivered to Joseph Smith, who
translated them by the gift and power of God. The record is now
published in many languages as a new and additional witness that Jesus
Christ is the Son of the living God

Good Morning

unread,
May 23, 2013, 1:33:36 PM5/23/13
to
In article <c6230d88-cd35-49a3...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
A Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 23, 9:11=A0am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>>
>> >The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of two or
>> >three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15; 2 Cor.
>> >13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
>> >relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one another
>> >(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multiple
>> >witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The law of
>> >witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Church of
>> >Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>>
>> >A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the reality
>> >of, an event. ...
>>
>> So, who was the second witness
>> of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?
>
>Nonessential.
>He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming to at
>that point.

The "event" in this case is Smith giving them back
in the manner he claimed, and there are no witnesses
to that event.

That he didn't have them was not only *not* obvious
(he could have hidden them, for instance), but is also
irrelevent to the question of whether they had been
given back in the manner he claimed.

Face it. Mormons ignore the "Law of Witnesses" in this case.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 23, 2013, 2:21:58 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 1:33 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <c6230d88-cd35-49a3-91b6-9bb8f4157...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
> A Really Really Large Number says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 23, 9:11=A0am, Good Morning  <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.googlegroups=
> >.com>,
> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>
> >> >http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>
> >> >The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of two or
> >> >three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15; 2 Cor.
> >> >13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
> >> >relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one another
> >> >(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multiple
> >> >witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The law of
> >> >witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Church of
> >> >Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>
> >> >A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the reality
> >> >of, an event. ...
>
> >> So, who was the second witness
> >> of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?
>
> >Nonessential.
> >He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming to at
> >that point.
>
> The "event" in this case is Smith giving them back
> in the manner he claimed

The angel in charge of the plates is the witness, and GOD viewing it.

Sufficient on judgment day for GOD.

Don't you know all the people who can tell you that smith didn't have
them later?

Are you some world class drooling bumbling moronic imbecile?

Good Morning

unread,
May 23, 2013, 2:40:27 PM5/23/13
to
In article <fb403872-4847-49dd...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 23, 1:33=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <c6230d88-cd35-49a3-91b6-9bb8f4157...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 23, 9:11=3DA0am, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>>
>> >> >The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of two or
>> >> >three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15; 2 Cor=
>.
>> >> >13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
>> >> >relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one another
>> >> >(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multiple
>> >> >witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The law of
>> >> >witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Church of
>> >> >Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>>
>> >> >A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the reality
>> >> >of, an event. ...
>>
>> >> So, who was the second witness
>> >> of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?
>>
>> >Nonessential.
>> >He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming to at
>> >that point.
>>
>> The "event" in this case is Smith giving them back
>> in the manner he claimed
>
>The angel in charge of the plates is the witness, and GOD viewing it.
>
>Sufficient on judgment day for GOD.
>

So, faced with being called on the obvious dodging bull
you served up, you have taken it upon yourself to re-write
the Law of Witnesses so that angels and deities count.

Nice example of why Mormonism is nothing but
white boys making shit up.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 23, 2013, 2:42:56 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 2:40 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <fb403872-4847-49dd-8522-26dda29dc...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, A
No, it still holds.
Those witnesses of your irrelevancy will be there on your judgment day
you blathering moron.

Plus all the witnesses who know that he no longer had them YOU STUPID
RETARD!

Good Morning

unread,
May 23, 2013, 3:27:06 PM5/23/13
to
In article <7687d90a-3d78-4a95...@z10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
A Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 23, 2:40=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <fb403872-4847-49dd-8522-26dda29dc...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 23, 1:33=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <c6230d88-cd35-49a3-91b6-9bb8f4157...@h13g2000yqe.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 23, 9:11=3D3DA0am, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.google=
>gro=3D
>> >ups=3D3D
>> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>>
>> >> >> >The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of two =
>or
>> >> >> >three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15; 2 =
>Cor=3D
>> >.
>> >> >> >13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
>> >> >> >relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one another
>> >> >> >(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multiple
>> >> >> >witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The law o=
>f
>> >> >> >witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Church o=
>f
>> >> >> >Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>>
>> >> >> >A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the realit=
>y
>> >> >> >of, an event. ...
>>
>> >> >> So, who was the second witness
>> >> >> of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?
>>
>> >> >Nonessential.
>> >> >He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming to at
>> >> >that point.
>>
>> >> The "event" in this case is Smith giving them back
>> >> in the manner he claimed
>>
>> >The angel in charge of the plates is the witness, and GOD viewing it.
>>
>> >Sufficient on judgment day for GOD.
>>
>> So, faced with being called on the obvious dodging bull
>> you served up, you have taken it upon yourself to re-write
>> the Law of Witnesses
>
>No, it still holds.

Care to back up that bald assertion?

>Those witnesses of your irrelevancy will be there on your judgment day
>you blathering moron.
>

I mean, with more than a "menacing curse."

>Plus all the witnesses who know that he no longer had them YOU STUPID
>RETARD!

So, if I show you a dollar bill, and the next day I tell you
that I gave it to an angel, you will be convinced by the fact
that I am no longer showing you the dollar bill that I must
have given it to an angel?

You're a great purveyor of that peculiar form of illogical bluster
I've heard disparagingly referred to as "Mormon Logic."

It looks like dumb-as-rocks stupidity to those outside your cult.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 23, 2013, 3:29:37 PM5/23/13
to
On May 23, 3:27 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <7687d90a-3d78-4a95-95c8-46bc21d0a...@z10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
If I thought you were honest, which I don't.

If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me?

Good Morning

unread,
May 23, 2013, 3:36:43 PM5/23/13
to
In article <4a3cf785-c69e-462e...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 23, 3:27=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <7687d90a-3d78-4a95-95c8-46bc21d0a...@z10g2000yqd.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >On May 23, 2:40=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <fb403872-4847-49dd-8522-26dda29dc...@k6g2000yqh.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 23, 1:33=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <c6230d88-cd35-49a3-91b6-9bb8f4157...@h13g2000yqe.google=
>gro=3D
>> >ups=3D3D
>> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 23, 9:11=3D3D3DA0am, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.goo=
>gle=3D
>> >gro=3D3D
>> >> >ups=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>>
>> >> >> >> >The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth of t=
>wo =3D
>> >or
>> >> >> >> >three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:15;=
> 2 =3D
>> >Cor=3D3D
>> >> >.
>> >> >> >> >13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as human
>> >> >> >> >relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one anoth=
>er
>> >> >> >> >(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give multip=
>le
>> >> >> >> >witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The la=
>w o=3D
>> >f
>> >> >> >> >witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Churc=
>h o=3D
>> >f
>> >> >> >> >Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>>
>> >> >> >> >A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the rea=
>lit=3D
>> >y
>> >> >> >> >of, an event. ...
>>
>> >> >> >> So, who was the second witness
>> >> >> >> of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?
>>
>> >> >> >Nonessential.
>> >> >> >He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming to a=
>t
>> >> >> >that point.
>>
>> >> >> The "event" in this case is Smith giving them back
>> >> >> in the manner he claimed
>>
>> >> >The angel in charge of the plates is the witness, and GOD viewing it.
>>
>> >> >Sufficient on judgment day for GOD.
>>
>> >> So, faced with being called on the obvious dodging bull
>> >> you served up, you have taken it upon yourself to re-write
>> >> the Law of Witnesses
>>
>> >No, it still holds.
>>
>> Care to back up that bald assertion?
>>
>> >Those witnesses of your irrelevancy will be there on your judgment day
>> >you blathering moron.
>>
>> I mean, with more than a "menacing curse."
>>
>> >Plus all the witnesses who know that he no longer had them YOU STUPID
>> >RETARD!
>>
>> So, if I show you a dollar bill, and the next day I tell you
>> that I gave it to an angel, you will be convinced by the fact
>> that I am no longer showing you the dollar bill that I must
>> have given it to an angel?
>
>If I thought you were honest, which I don't.
>

Proof that you're a gullible Mormon.

>If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me?

Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 24, 2013, 2:45:19 PM5/24/13
to
On May 23, 3:36 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <4a3cf785-c69e-462e-bb59-777817267...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
Me not accepting your word makes me gullible?

>
> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me?
>
> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.- Hide quoted text -

Yes there are.
Who gave me the money in kansas city?

Good Morning

unread,
May 24, 2013, 2:56:52 PM5/24/13
to
In article <5596a006-843c-43ec...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 23, 3:36=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <4a3cf785-c69e-462e-bb59-777817267...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 23, 3:27=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <7687d90a-3d78-4a95-95c8-46bc21d0a...@z10g2000yqd.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 23, 2:40=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <fb403872-4847-49dd-8522-26dda29dc...@k6g2000yqh.googleg=
>rou=3D
>> >ps.=3D3D
>> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 23, 1:33=3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <c6230d88-cd35-49a3-91b6-9bb8f4157...@h13g2000yqe.goo=
>gle=3D
>> >gro=3D3D
>> >> >ups=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >On May 23, 9:11=3D3D3D3DA0am, Good Morning =3D3D3DA0<Good_mem..=
>.@newsg=3D
>> >uy.com>=3D3D
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In article <3b113ec0-0b1f-45c7-90e1-19cb236ba...@e14g2000yqp.=
>goo=3D
>> >gle=3D3D
>> >> >gro=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >ups=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >http://eom.byu.edu/index.php/Witnesses,_Law_of
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >The scriptural law of witnesses requires that in the mouth o=
>f t=3D
>> >wo =3D3D
>> >> >or
>> >> >> >> >> >three individuals shall every word be established (Deut. 19:=
>15;=3D
>> > 2 =3D3D
>> >> >Cor=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >.
>> >> >> >> >> >13:1; 1 Tim. 5:19). This law applies in divine as well as hu=
>man
>> >> >> >> >> >relations, for members of the Godhead bear witness of one an=
>oth=3D
>> >er
>> >> >> >> >> >(John 5:31-37; 3 Ne. 11:32), and books of holy writ give mul=
>tip=3D
>> >le
>> >> >> >> >> >witness to the work of God in the earth (2 Ne. 29:8-13). The=
> la=3D
>> >w o=3D3D
>> >> >f
>> >> >> >> >> >witnesses is prominent in the history and practice of The Ch=
>urc=3D
>> >h o=3D3D
>> >> >f
>> >> >> >> >> >Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >A witness gives personal verification of, or attests to the =
>rea=3D
>> >lit=3D3D
>> >> >y
>> >> >> >> >> >of, an event. ...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> So, who was the second witness
>> >> >> >> >> of Smith's returning of the "Golden Plates"?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Nonessential.
>> >> >> >> >He obviously didn't have them anymore, and he wasn't claiming t=
>o a=3D
>> >t
>> >> >> >> >that point.
>>
>> >> >> >> The "event" in this case is Smith giving them back
>> >> >> >> in the manner he claimed
>>
>> >> >> >The angel in charge of the plates is the witness, and GOD viewing =
>it.
>>
>> >> >> >Sufficient on judgment day for GOD.
>>
>> >> >> So, faced with being called on the obvious dodging bull
>> >> >> you served up, you have taken it upon yourself to re-write
>> >> >> the Law of Witnesses
>>
>> >> >No, it still holds.
>>
>> >> Care to back up that bald assertion?
>>
>> >> >Those witnesses of your irrelevancy will be there on your judgment da=
>y
>> >> >you blathering moron.
>>
>> >> I mean, with more than a "menacing curse."
>>
>> >> >Plus all the witnesses who know that he no longer had them YOU STUPID
>> >> >RETARD!
>>
>> >> So, if I show you a dollar bill, and the next day I tell you
>> >> that I gave it to an angel, you will be convinced by the fact
>> >> that I am no longer showing you the dollar bill that I must
>> >> have given it to an angel?
>>
>> >If I thought you were honest, which I don't.
>>
>> Proof that you're a gullible Mormon.
>
>Me not accepting your word makes me gullible?
>

You thinking there are angels makes you gullible.


>>
>> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me?
>>
>> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>
>Yes there are.
>Who gave me the money in kansas city?

Where do angels get money?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 24, 2013, 2:58:16 PM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 2:56 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>, A
> Where do angels get money?- Hide quoted text -

Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.

Good Morning

unread,
May 24, 2013, 3:06:56 PM5/24/13
to
In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
A Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 24, 2:56=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me?
>>
>> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >Yes there are.
>> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> Where do angels get money?
>
>Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.

Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 24, 2013, 3:09:29 PM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 3:06 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.- Hide quoted text -

What do you think angels are?

Good Morning

unread,
May 24, 2013, 3:56:08 PM5/24/13
to
In article <7a58ae03-24cf-414a...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 24, 3:06=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >On May 24, 2:56=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me=
>?
>>
>> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>
>What do you think angels are?

Non-existent, except if you are using the term colloquially
to refer to the backer of a theatrical production, or a person
you like very much. Why don't you simply state what you
mean by "angel" and why you think you encountered one?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 24, 2013, 4:01:08 PM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 3:56 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <7a58ae03-24cf-414a-ae50-b5b9a9962...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, A
> Really Really Large Number says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On May 24, 3:06=A0pm, Good Morning  <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups=
> >.com>,
> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>
> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googlegrou=
> >ps.=3D
> >> >com>, A
> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>
> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me=
> >?
>
> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>
> >> >> >Yes there are.
> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>
> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>
> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>
> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>
> >What do you think angels are?
>
> Non-existent

Then who gave me money in kansas city?

Good Morning

unread,
May 24, 2013, 4:22:52 PM5/24/13
to
In article <1621499c-d001-4865...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 24, 3:56=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <7a58ae03-24cf-414a-ae50-b5b9a9962...@d6g2000yqi.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 24, 3:06=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googleg=
>rou=3D
>> >ps.=3D3D
>> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe=
> me=3D
>> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >What do you think angels are?
>>
>> Non-existent
>
>Then who gave me money in kansas city?

You don't have the hang of the concept that
the burden of proof lies with the claimant, do you?
You made a fool of yourself at a similar point in a recent thread
by demanding proof of a negative. Why not relive that
glorious moment of triumph by demanding that I prove
that an angel didn't give you money in kansas city?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 24, 2013, 4:24:08 PM5/24/13
to
On May 24, 4:22 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <1621499c-d001-4865-8900-b5c662a85...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
gag order.

Good Morning

unread,
May 24, 2013, 5:10:07 PM5/24/13
to
In article <6033b5b9-6d06-49d8...@20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 24, 4:22=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <1621499c-d001-4865-8900-b5c662a85...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >On May 24, 3:56=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <7a58ae03-24cf-414a-ae50-b5b9a9962...@d6g2000yqi.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 24, 3:06=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.google=
>gro=3D
>> >ups=3D3D
>> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.goog=
>leg=3D
>> >rou=3D3D
>> >> >ps.=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you beli=
>eve=3D
>> > me=3D3D
>> >> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >> >What do you think angels are?
>>
>> >> Non-existent
>>
>> >Then who gave me money in kansas city?
>>
>> You don't have the hang of the concept that
>> the burden of proof lies with the claimant, do you?
>
>gag order.

Huh?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 28, 2013, 2:20:55 PM5/28/13
to
On May 24, 3:06 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned something?
I would be impressed.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 28, 2013, 2:28:30 PM5/28/13
to
On May 24, 4:22 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <1621499c-d001-4865-8900-b5c662a85...@r3g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
http://www.bartleby.com/108/01/19.html

1 And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate
of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them

2 turn in, I pray you, into your servant's house, and tarry all night,
and wash your feet

5 and they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men
which came in to thee this night?

10 But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to
them, and shut to the door.

11 And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with
blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to
find the door

13 for we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen
great before the face of the LORD; and the LORD hath sent us to
destroy it.

15 ¶ And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot,
saying, Arise, take thy wife, and thy two daughters, which are here;
lest thou be consumed in the iniquity of the city.

16 And while he lingered, the men laid hold upon his hand, and upon
the hand of his wife

Good Morning

unread,
May 29, 2013, 2:41:59 AM5/29/13
to
In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 24, 3:06=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegroups=
>.com>,
>> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 24, 2:56=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe me=
>?
>>
>> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>
>Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned something?
>I would be impressed.

I already knew that there were deluded people like you
who imagine that some of the humans they meet are "angels."

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 29, 2013, 12:15:56 PM5/29/13
to
On May 29, 2:41 am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e-841b-acd120267...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, A
Delusion is a departure from reality.
Since angels exist, you are the one deluded.

Good Morning

unread,
May 29, 2013, 1:27:08 PM5/29/13
to
In article <fdc63158-02ae-4f2a...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 29, 2:41=A0am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e-841b-acd120267...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 24, 3:06=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.googlegro=
>ups=3D
>> >.com>,
>> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.googleg=
>rou=3D
>> >ps.=3D3D
>> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you believe=
> me=3D
>> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned something?
>> >I would be impressed.
>>
>> I already knew that there were deluded people
>
>Delusion is a departure from reality.
>Since angels exist, you are the one deluded.

Angels only exist in literature and graphic art.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 29, 2013, 1:31:28 PM5/29/13
to
On May 29, 1:27 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <fdc63158-02ae-4f2a-96e6-1ae8075fb...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, A
> Angels only exist in literature and graphic art.- Hide quoted text -

No, they exist on camera of when I was under surveillance and one
pulled up to me in kansas city.
They also exist on camera when one came down to visit me while I slept
in the boston shelter.

Good Morning

unread,
May 29, 2013, 3:29:37 PM5/29/13
to
In article <409f5961-5c8d-47b4...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 29, 1:27=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <fdc63158-02ae-4f2a-96e6-1ae8075fb...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 29, 2:41=3DA0am, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e-841b-acd120267...@k4g2000yqb.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 24, 3:06=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.google=
>gro=3D
>> >ups=3D3D
>> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.goog=
>leg=3D
>> >rou=3D3D
>> >> >ps.=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you beli=
>eve=3D
>> > me=3D3D
>> >> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >> >Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned something?
>> >> >I would be impressed.
>>
>> >> I already knew that there were deluded people
>>
>> >Delusion is a departure from reality.
>> >Since angels exist, you are the one deluded.
>>
>> Angels only exist in literature and graphic art.
>
>No, they exist on camera of when I was under surveillance and one
>pulled up to me in kansas city.
>They also exist on camera when one came down to visit me while I slept
>in the boston shelter.

I'm guessing that these angels in the footage
you're referring to would look like ordinary people.
What makes them angels, as opposed to merely people?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 29, 2013, 7:11:19 PM5/29/13
to
On May 29, 3:29 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <409f5961-5c8d-47b4-8dd6-3ffbfb257...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, A
> What makes them angels, as opposed to merely people?- Hide quoted text -

After I left him, he mentioned Jesus, so i turned around and walked
back over to him.
He then showed me his eyes, they became something else, letting me
know what he was.

Did you catch him?

Good Morning

unread,
May 30, 2013, 12:21:51 PM5/30/13
to
In article <a7d98864-301a-4733...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 29, 3:29=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <409f5961-5c8d-47b4-8dd6-3ffbfb257...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >On May 29, 1:27=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <fdc63158-02ae-4f2a-96e6-1ae8075fb...@v2g2000yqa.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 29, 2:41=3D3DA0am, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e-841b-acd120267...@k4g2000yqb.googleg=
>rou=3D
>> >ps.=3D3D
>> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 24, 3:06=3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.goo=
>gle=3D
>> >gro=3D3D
>> >> >ups=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3D3DA0<Good_mem..=
>.@newsg=3D
>> >uy.com>=3D3D
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yqh.g=
>oog=3D
>> >leg=3D3D
>> >> >rou=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would you b=
>eli=3D
>> >eve=3D3D
>> >> > me=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> >> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >> >> >Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned somethin=
>g?
>> >> >> >I would be impressed.
>>
>> >> >> I already knew that there were deluded people
>>
>> >> >Delusion is a departure from reality.
>> >> >Since angels exist, you are the one deluded.
>>
>> >> Angels only exist in literature and graphic art.
>>
>> >No, they exist on camera of when I was under surveillance and one
>> >pulled up to me in kansas city.
>> >They also exist on camera when one came down to visit me while I slept
>> >in the boston shelter.
>>
>> I'm guessing that these angels in the footage
>> you're referring to would look like ordinary people.
>> What makes them angels, as opposed to merely people?- Hide quoted text -
>
>After I left him, he mentioned Jesus, so i turned around and walked
>back over to him.
>He then showed me his eyes, they became something else, letting me
>know what he was.
>
>Did you catch him?

Some people have amazing eyes.
Why would you think that such a person
was a supernatural being in human form?

What difference would it make to this discussion
if we did catch him? I'd inform you that he was obviously
human and you would make up some white boy religious
bullshit about how he cleverly didn't reveal his angelity
to me because I'm evil, or because I am evil I don't have
the ability to detect angels.

Of course, we caught him.
Why don't you contact him and verify that with him?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 30, 2013, 1:41:58 PM5/30/13
to
On May 30, 12:21 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <a7d98864-301a-4733-bacb-eafe4b8de...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, A
Immaterial to the issue.

> What difference would it make to this discussion
> if we did catch him?

You didn't catch him because he went back up.

Good Morning

unread,
May 31, 2013, 4:30:22 AM5/31/13
to
In article <afcb0bcb-9bb0-4b01...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 30, 12:21=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <a7d98864-301a-4733-bacb-eafe4b8de...@v2g2000yqa.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 29, 3:29=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> >> In article <409f5961-5c8d-47b4-8dd6-3ffbfb257...@v2g2000yqa.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 29, 1:27=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <fdc63158-02ae-4f2a-96e6-1ae8075fb...@v2g2000yqa.googleg=
>rou=3D
>> >ps.=3D3D
>> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 29, 2:41=3D3D3DA0am, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e-841b-acd120267...@k4g2000yqb.goog=
>leg=3D
>> >rou=3D3D
>> >> >ps.=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >On May 24, 3:06=3D3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3D3DA0<Good_mem..=
>.@newsg=3D
>> >uy.com>=3D3D
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000yqe.=
>goo=3D
>> >gle=3D3D
>> >> >gro=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >ups=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3D3D3DA0<Goo=
>d_mem..=3D
>> >.@newsg=3D3D
>> >> >uy.com>=3D3D3D
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g2000yq=
>h.g=3D
>> >oog=3D3D
>> >> >leg=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >rou=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would yo=
>u b=3D
>> >eli=3D3D
>> >> >eve=3D3D3D
>> >> >> > me=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >> >> >> >Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned somet=
>hin=3D
>> >g?
>> >> >> >> >I would be impressed.
>>
>> >> >> >> I already knew that there were deluded people
>>
>> >> >> >Delusion is a departure from reality.
>> >> >> >Since angels exist, you are the one deluded.
>>
>> >> >> Angels only exist in literature and graphic art.
>>
>> >> >No, they exist on camera of when I was under surveillance and one
>> >> >pulled up to me in kansas city.
>> >> >They also exist on camera when one came down to visit me while I slep=
>t
>> >> >in the boston shelter.
>>
>> >> I'm guessing that these angels in the footage
>> >> you're referring to would look like ordinary people.
>> >> What makes them angels, as opposed to merely people?- Hide quoted text=
> -
>>
>> >After I left him, he mentioned Jesus, so i turned around and walked
>> >back over to him.
>> >He then showed me his eyes, they became something else, letting me
>> >know what he was.
>>
>> >Did you catch him?
>>
>> Some people have amazing eyes.
>
>Immaterial to the issue.

Only if you truncate my comment and pretend you didn't.

The issue is that you are just another religion-infected loon
who offers nothing but unsupported claims but expects
others to take their imaginary friends seriously.


>
>> What difference would it make to this discussion
>> if we did catch him?
>
>You didn't catch him because he went back up.

You're just addicted to unsupported claims.

Have you considered the possibility that God is
totally pissed at you? I mean, you've been ranting
on usenet for years about how you're getting some kind
of raw deal from the government, persecuted unmercifully,
and while you've been spreading His Word and teachings
tirelessly damn near every day.

And God sends you an angel
... who gives you a few measly bucks and then leaves?

Dude, you are being seriously dissed.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 31, 2013, 10:17:11 AM5/31/13
to
On May 31, 4:30 am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <afcb0bcb-9bb0-4b01-ab72-d0b3d6d5a...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>, A
You don't determine what the only thinking allowed is.

> The issue is that you are just another religion-infected loon
> who offers nothing but unsupported claims but expects
> others to take their imaginary friends seriously.
>
>
>
> >> What difference would it make to this discussion
> >> if we did catch him?
>
> >You didn't catch him because he went back up.
>
> You're just addicted to unsupported claims.

Gag order.

>
> Have you considered the possibility that God is
> totally pissed at you?

You are not GOD.

Good Morning

unread,
May 31, 2013, 6:27:33 PM5/31/13
to
In article <d20d698c-b01b-4cff...@m8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 31, 4:30=A0am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <afcb0bcb-9bb0-4b01-ab72-d0b3d6d5a...@k4g2000yqb.googlegroups.=
>com>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 30, 12:21=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote=
>:
>> >> In article <a7d98864-301a-4733-bacb-eafe4b8de...@v2g2000yqa.googlegrou=
>ps.=3D
>> >com>, A
>> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >On May 29, 3:29=3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3DA0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com>=
> wrote:
>> >> >> In article <409f5961-5c8d-47b4-8dd6-3ffbfb257...@v2g2000yqa.googleg=
>rou=3D
>> >ps.=3D3D
>> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >On May 29, 1:27=3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3DA0<Good_mem...@newsg=
>uy.com>=3D
>> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> In article <fdc63158-02ae-4f2a-96e6-1ae8075fb...@v2g2000yqa.goog=
>leg=3D
>> >rou=3D3D
>> >> >ps.=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >On May 29, 2:41=3D3D3D3DA0am, Good Morning =3D3D3DA0<Good_mem..=
>.@newsg=3D
>> >uy.com>=3D3D
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> In article <e285f002-e1cb-4a6e-841b-acd120267...@k4g2000yqb.g=
>oog=3D
>> >leg=3D3D
>> >> >rou=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >On May 24, 3:06=3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3D3D3DA0<Goo=
>d_mem..=3D
>> >.@newsg=3D3D
>> >> >uy.com>=3D3D3D
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> In article <017ee9ca-ba7e-4c3b-93ba-08e80a932...@h13g2000y=
>qe.=3D
>> >goo=3D3D
>> >> >gle=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >gro=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >ups=3D3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >> >.com>,
>> >> >> >> >> >> A Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >On May 24, 2:56=3D3D3D3D3D3DA0pm, Good Morning =3D3D3D3D3=
>DA0<Goo=3D
>> >d_mem..=3D3D
>> >> >.@newsg=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >uy.com>=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> In article <5596a006-843c-43ec-9f43-a1c618162...@g9g200=
>0yq=3D
>> >h.g=3D3D
>> >> >oog=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >leg=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >rou=3D3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >> >ps.=3D3D3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >> >> >com>, A
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >If I told you an angel gave me a few dollars, would=
> yo=3D
>> >u b=3D3D
>> >> >eli=3D3D3D
>> >> >> >eve=3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> > me=3D3D3D3D3D
>> >> >> >> >> >?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Of course not. There's no such thing as angels.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Yes there are.
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >Who gave me the money in kansas city?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >> Where do angels get money?
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Whatever they were doing down here on their assignment.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Sounds like they act exactly like human beings.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> >Have you finally, after all these years, actually learned so=
>met=3D
>> >hin=3D3D
>> >> >g?
>> >> >> >> >> >I would be impressed.
>>
>> >> >> >> >> I already knew that there were deluded people
>>
>> >> >> >> >Delusion is a departure from reality.
>> >> >> >> >Since angels exist, you are the one deluded.
>>
>> >> >> >> Angels only exist in literature and graphic art.
>>
>> >> >> >No, they exist on camera of when I was under surveillance and one
>> >> >> >pulled up to me in kansas city.
>> >> >> >They also exist on camera when one came down to visit me while I s=
>lep=3D
>> >t
>> >> >> >in the boston shelter.
>>
>> >> >> I'm guessing that these angels in the footage
>> >> >> you're referring to would look like ordinary people.
>> >> >> What makes them angels, as opposed to merely people?- Hide quoted t=
>ext=3D
>> > -
>>
>> >> >After I left him, he mentioned Jesus, so i turned around and walked
>> >> >back over to him.
>> >> >He then showed me his eyes, they became something else, letting me
>> >> >know what he was.
>>
>> >> >Did you catch him?
>>
>> >> Some people have amazing eyes.
>>
>> >Immaterial to the issue.
>>
>> Only if
>
>You don't determine what the only thinking allowed is.
>
>> The issue is that you are just another religion-infected loon
>> who offers nothing but unsupported claims but expects
>> others to take their imaginary friends seriously.
>>
>>
>>
>> >> What difference would it make to this discussion
>> >> if we did catch him?
>>
>> >You didn't catch him because he went back up.
>>
>> You're just addicted to unsupported claims.
>
>Gag order.
>

So you're kissing a judge's ass to protect yourself
and using it as an excuse for not divulging objective
factual support for your claim that angels are real?
Something that would result in billions of people
embracing the one true religion?

No wonder God's pissed at you.

>>
>> Have you considered the possibility that God is
>> totally pissed at you?
>
>You are not GOD.

Dude, God sent an angel to give you a measly $2.
He's trying to tell you something.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
May 31, 2013, 6:34:05 PM5/31/13
to
On May 31, 3:27 pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:


> >Gag order.
>
> So you're kissing a judge's ass

You are extraordinarily delusional.

>
>
> >> Have you considered the possibility that God is
> >> totally pissed at you?
>
> >You are not GOD.
>
> Dude, God sent an angel to give you a measly $2.

No, God left another witness ....

Good Morning

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 9:27:16 AM6/1/13
to
In article <c977a331-deec-4439...@2g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On May 31, 3:27=A0pm, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
>
>> >Gag order.
>>
>> So you're kissing a judge's ass
>
>You are extraordinarily delusional.

Thinking that an almsgiver is an angel
is extraordinarily delusional.


>
>>
>>
>> >> Have you considered the possibility that God is
>> >> totally pissed at you?
>>
>> >You are not GOD.
>>
>> Dude, God sent an angel to give you a measly $2.
>
>No, God left another witness ....
>

So, this deity of yours removes all doubt
from some followers, making it unnecessary for
them to have faith -- and then they go out and
teach that that people need to have faith.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 9:35:18 AM6/1/13
to
On Jun 1, 6:27 am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <c977a331-deec-4439-9472-00eedce88...@2g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>, A
> Really Really Large Number says...
>
>
>
> >On May 31, 3:27=A0pm, Good Morning  <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
> >> >Gag order.
>
> >> So you're kissing a judge's ass
>
> >You are extraordinarily delusional.
>
> Thinking that an almsgiver is an angel
> is extraordinarily delusional.
>

Except the evidence indicates he is.

>
>
> >> >> Have you considered the possibility that God is
> >> >> totally pissed at you?
>
> >> >You are not GOD.
>
> >> Dude, God sent an angel to give you a measly $2.
>
> >No, God left another witness ....
>
> So, this deity of yours removes all doubt
> from some followers, making it unnecessary for
> them to have faith

Is what was given by him perfect knowledge?

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 9:44:58 AM6/1/13
to
On Jun 1, 6:27 am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <c977a331-deec-4439-9472-00eedce88...@2g2000yqr.googlegroups.com>, A
> Really Really Large Number says...
>
>
>
> >On May 31, 3:27=A0pm, Good Morning  <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
> >> >Gag order.
>
> >> So you're kissing a judge's ass
>
> >You are extraordinarily delusional.
>
> Thinking that

Everything indicates all the evidence that I am definitely not kissing
up to any judge.

Good Morning

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 11:12:40 AM6/1/13
to
In article <36372416-d954-4d76...@20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
Really Really Large Number says...
>
>On Jun 1, 6:27=A0am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>> In article <c977a331-deec-4439-9472-00eedce88...@2g2000yqr.googlegroups.c=
>om>, A
>> Really Really Large Number says...
>>
>>
>>
>> >On May 31, 3:27=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Gag order.
>>
>> >> So you're kissing a judge's ass
>>
>> >You are extraordinarily delusional.
>>
>> Thinking that an almsgiver is an angel
>> is extraordinarily delusional.
>>
>
>Except the evidence indicates he is.
>

You Godnuts never demonstrate your claims are true
-- you just blow hot air.

So has it always been.
So shall it always be.



>>
>>
>> >> >> Have you considered the possibility that God is
>> >> >> totally pissed at you?
>>
>> >> >You are not GOD.
>>
>> >> Dude, God sent an angel to give you a measly $2.
>>
>> >No, God left another witness ....
>>
>> So, this deity of yours removes all doubt
>> from some followers, making it unnecessary for
>> them to have faith
>
>Is what was given by him perfect knowledge?

Is what was given by him perfect enough for you
so that you have no doubt that your deity is real?
Of course it is.

You are playing coy because you know that
if you are telling the truth, you no longer have
any need whatsoever for faith -- only other
people who aren't as super-duper special
like you are need to have faith.

Of course, you can't say that.

A Really Really Large Number

unread,
Jun 1, 2013, 11:23:33 AM6/1/13
to
On Jun 1, 8:12 am, Good Morning <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> In article <36372416-d954-4d76-bc17-d736d53f7...@20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>, A
> Really Really Large Number says...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jun 1, 6:27=A0am, Good Morning  <Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >> In article <c977a331-deec-4439-9472-00eedce88...@2g2000yqr.googlegroups.c=
> >om>, A
> >> Really Really Large Number says...
>
> >> >On May 31, 3:27=3DA0pm, Good Morning =A0<Good_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >Gag order.
>
> >> >> So you're kissing a judge's ass
>
> >> >You are extraordinarily delusional.
>
> >> Thinking that an almsgiver is an angel
> >> is extraordinarily delusional.
>
> >Except the evidence indicates he is.
>
> You Godnuts never demonstrate your claims are true
> -- you just blow hot air.

It is on film, stop outright telling lies.


>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> >> Have you considered the possibility that God is
> >> >> >> totally pissed at you?
>
> >> >> >You are not GOD.
>
> >> >> Dude, God sent an angel to give you a measly $2.
>
> >> >No, God left another witness ....
>
> >> So, this deity of yours removes all doubt
> >> from some followers, making it unnecessary for
> >> them to have faith
>
> >Is what was given by him perfect knowledge?
>
> You are playing coy because you know that
> if you are telling the truth, you no longer have
> any need whatsoever for faith

Only as to the existence of angels.
0 new messages