Re: Six year old boy: "When are we going to die?"

dsharavi

unread,

May 8, 2009, 12:26:17 AM5/8/09

to

>>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
>>>>>>The mystery is
>>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?

>>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.

Excepting when the advocates are antisemites, and the chief motive for
their “advocacy” is their antisemitism.

>>>>>>Every time you
>>>>>>make that charge, R. L. Measures, you disparage the memory of Jews
>>>>>>that have suffered under anti-Semitism,

Another mystery: how pondering the origins of antisemitism is somehow
“disparages” the “memory of Jews” who suffered and are suffering from
it. To be explained, no doubt, by those possessing any number of
Jewish friends.

>>>>R. L. Measures wrote:
>>>>>** Duwayne is undoubtedly one piece of work.
>>>>>It's no wonder
>>>>>that the Mormons don't want him anywhere near their Celestial
>>>>>Impregnatorium.

>>>>Non-responsive personal insult noted.

lol

>>>Two birds with one stone.

>>How do non-responsive personal insults accomplish that?

lol

R.L. Measures wrote:
>** clueless

You can say that again. Clueless in general, and definitely clueless
as to what a butt he's made of himself on these NGs. Oh well, he
probably won't be entertaining us with his mindless parrotings much
longer. Hard to believe this character is in his 50s, isn't it?

Deborah

>R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734,www.somis.org

B.H. Cramer

unread,

May 8, 2009, 2:19:02 AM5/8/09

to

dsharavi wrote:
>>>>>> r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
>>>>>>> The mystery is
>>>>>>>> where did his anti-S come from?
>
>>>>>> Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>> Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
>
> Excepting when the advocates are antisemites, and the chief motive for

> their ï¿½advocacyï¿½ is their antisemitism.

>
>>>>>>> Every time you
>>>>>>> make that charge, R. L. Measures, you disparage the memory of
>>>>>>> Jews that have suffered under anti-Semitism,
>
> Another mystery: how pondering the origins of antisemitism is somehow

> ï¿½disparagesï¿½ the ï¿½memory of Jewsï¿½ who suffered and are suffering from

> it. To be explained, no doubt, by those possessing any number of
> Jewish friends.
>
>>>>> R. L. Measures wrote:
>>>>>> ** Duwayne is undoubtedly one piece of work.
>>>>>> It's no wonder
>>>>>> that the Mormons don't want him anywhere near their Celestial
>>>>>> Impregnatorium.
>
>>>>> Non-responsive personal insult noted.
>
> lol
>
>>>> Two birds with one stone.
>
>>> How do non-responsive personal insults accomplish that?
>
> lol
>
> R.L. Measures wrote:
>> ** clueless
>
> You can say that again.

It's what you engage in on a post by post basis, slime.

�R. L. Measures

unread,

May 8, 2009, 6:18:28 AM5/8/09

to

In article
<adb627c6-6006-4add...@d7g2000prl.googlegroups.com>,
dsharavi <dsha...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> >>>>>>The mystery is
> >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
>
> >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
>
> Excepting when the advocates are antisemites, and the chief motive for

> their =93advocacy=94 is their antisemitism.

>
> >>>>>>Every time you
> >>>>>>make that charge, R. L. Measures, you disparage the memory of Jews
> >>>>>>that have suffered under anti-Semitism,
>
> Another mystery: how pondering the origins of antisemitism is somehow

> =93disparages=94 the =93memory of Jews=94 who suffered and are suffering fr=

> om
> it. To be explained, no doubt, by those possessing any number of
> Jewish friends.
>
> >>>>R. L. Measures wrote:
> >>>>>** Duwayne is undoubtedly one piece of work.
> >>>>>It's no wonder
> >>>>>that the Mormons don't want him anywhere near their Celestial
> >>>>>Impregnatorium.
>
> >>>>Non-responsive personal insult noted.
>
> lol
>
> >>>Two birds with one stone.
>
> >>How do non-responsive personal insults accomplish that?
>
> lol
>
> R.L. Measures wrote:
> >** clueless
>
> You can say that again. Clueless in general, and definitely clueless
> as to what a butt he's made of himself on these NGs. Oh well, he
> probably won't be entertaining us with his mindless parrotings much
> longer. Hard to believe this character is in his 50s, isn't it?
>
> Deborah
>

** I see him as possibly middle-school.
> >R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734,www.somis.org

--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 8, 2009, 9:32:24 AM5/8/09

to

On May 7, 9:26 pm, dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> >>>>>>The mystery is
> >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
> >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
>
> Excepting when the advocates are antisemites,

Are you antisemitic, Deborah? If not, do you think Susan should
answer the following questions with "yes?"

1) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
2) Do Jews have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
5) Do Palestinians have the right to a homeland?
6) Do Jews have the right to a homeland?

> >R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734,www.somis.org- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 11, 2009, 4:27:47 PM5/11/09

to

On 8-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 7, 9:26�pm, dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> > >>>>>>The mystery is
> > >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
> > >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
> >
> > Excepting when the advocates are antisemites,
>
> Are you antisemitic, Deborah? If not, do you think Susan should
> answer the following questions with "yes?"

Gee, am I kicking your carapace SO hard that you need
to beg people who despire your bigotry for help against
the facts I post?? Especially after I've pointed them to
what I actually said?

You are SUCH A LOSER!!!!

Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 11, 2009, 4:39:20 PM5/11/09

to

On May 11, 1:27 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 8-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 7, 9:26 pm, dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> > > >>>>>>The mystery is
> > > >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
> > > >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
>
> > > Excepting when the advocates are antisemites,
>
> > Are you antisemitic, Deborah? If not, do you think Susan should
> > answer the following questions with "yes?"
>
> Gee, am I kicking your carapace

Susan, are you willing, yet, to answer "yes" to these questions?

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?

3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any decent, moral person would have the courage to say "yes."

Why won't you?

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 12, 2009, 6:46:55 AM5/12/09

to

I have read this `exchange` and would like to add some thoughts.
because one can see how you throw together elements that might be
connected in certain historical/ geographical conditions , but don`t
have
to be connected other historical/geographical conditions ,

Does Every Human person have a right to live ? Yes we hope so. and we
should ask more , Does every human have the right to a Decent life:
with
proper food, housing, medical care of sorts and education for the
children. Because Millions of people all over the world live in
poverty ,
illnes , lack of housing etc.... it is up to each of us to seek out
those
people who live near to him/her and try and better their lives a
little.
I am sure Mr Duwaynea that before you went out to the big world, to
solve
it`s problems, you saw to it that you helped as many poor people in
your
country/continnent. And now with the experience of having helped your
poor
people, you come to teach us.

All humans have the right to self determination. there is no doubt
about
that , people can determine their faith, their names etc .

Sometimes self determination is connected or can be connected to a
demand
or possibility of a homeland , But they are not always NORE NECCESARY
Connected to each other ,
Shomronites , Druze, Bedouins, Bahai , Valons, Cherkesh, Kar`aytes,
Coptics , Corsicans, Scots, Welsh , Aboriginals, Eskimo , Kurds ,
Amish ,
Flemish etc....ALL have the Right for Self determination , but they
have
no Homeland. Some are spread over a continent , some are minorities in
1
or several countries. Contemporary culture teaches us toaccept the
right

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 12, 2009, 6:57:43 AM5/12/09

to

oops the last sentence wasn`t sent ...

Contemporary culture teaches us toaccept the right of all humans for
self determination , it is a conemporary Social Cultural idea, nothing
to do with Moral, decency or Courage ...

You speak unkindly to Deborah and Susan, demanding something that you
don`t demand of yourself.
mirjam

B. Cramer

unread,

May 12, 2009, 7:02:23 AM5/12/09

to

<mir...@actcom.co.il> wrote in message
news:72eee9dd-9a13-4e94...@o27g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...

>oops the last sentence wasn`t sent ...

It matters not, jew slag. It was all bullshit.

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 12, 2009, 9:27:59 AM5/12/09

to

On May 12, 3:46 am, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> I have read this `exchange` and would like to add some thoughts.
> because one can see how you throw together elements that might be
> connected in certain historical/ geographical conditions , but don`t
> have
> to be connected other historical/geographical conditions ,
>
> Does Every Human person have a right to live ? Yes we hope so.

Thanks, I agree.

> and we
> should ask more , Does every human have the right to a Decent life:
> with
> proper food, housing, medical care of sorts and education for the
> children.

I think so.

> Because Millions of people all over the world live in
> poverty ,
> illnes , lack of housing etc.... it is up to each of us to seek out
> those
> people who live near to him/her and try and better their lives a
> little.
> I am sure Mr Duwaynea that before you went out to the big world, to
> solve
> it`s problems, you saw to it that you helped as many poor people in
> your
> country/continnent. And now with the experience of having helped your
> poor
> people, you come to teach us.

Do you need to be taught basic human rights? I think you got it right
in your discussion. What do you think I can teach you?

>
> All humans have the right to self determination. there is no doubt
> about
> that , people can determine their faith, their names etc .

Hey! We agree again.

>
> Sometimes self determination is connected or can be connected to a
> demand
> or possibility of a homeland , But they are not always NORE NECCESARY
> Connected to each other ,
> Shomronites , Druze, Bedouins, Bahai , Valons, Cherkesh, Kar`aytes,
> Coptics , Corsicans, Scots, Welsh , Aboriginals, Eskimo , Kurds ,
> Amish ,
> Flemish etc....ALL have the Right for Self determination , but they
> have
> no Homeland. Some are spread over a continent , some are minorities in
> 1
> or several countries. Contemporary culture teaches us toaccept the
> right

I agree with you there, too. The right to a homeland may not
necessarily be universal. But we agree that the right to life and
personal self determination is.

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 12, 2009, 9:31:02 AM5/12/09

to

Surely you jest. Asking Susan to answer "yes" to these basic
questions isn't "unkind." They didn't cause you any pain did they?

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?

3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

See? It doesn't hurt to say the questions. It doesn't hurt to answer
them with "yes."

I hope it hurt like hell when people answer no.

> demanding something that you
> don`t demand of yourself.

That makes no sense.

> mirjam

Tim McGaughy

unread,

May 12, 2009, 12:36:23 PM5/12/09

to

mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:

> You speak unkindly to Deborah and Susan, demanding something that you
> don`t demand of yourself.

Demanding what? All he's asking for is an opinion, and he's freely
giving his.

This is just a discussion, not a policy meeting between world leaders.

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 12, 2009, 4:37:42 PM5/12/09

to

mr Duwaynea
In your former answer to me , you write that we agree on most
points .
The difference between us is that i Believe that Every Human has basic
rights to live and toselfdetermination. And i believe that True
believers in those rights don`t start specifying if this rights are
also for certain groups!!!
thus by your 4 questions you are asking of people to make differences
between humans, something True Human Rights Believers shouldn`t do ,,
mirjam

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 12, 2009, 4:43:04 PM5/12/09

to

This are the sort of questions that are meant to make people look
bad , what ever they answer , since either one believes All have the
same rights , but is aware that conditions in life aren`t always the
same [example quality of life in Usa and Africa !!] Or one answers
that some people have different rights due to life circumstances
[ example Rights of Women in diferent countries and cultures] , and
than one is called bigot or some other insult , just because one is
realistic ,,,
mirjam

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 12, 2009, 5:08:38 PM5/12/09

to

On May 12, 1:37 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> mr Duwaynea
> In your former answer to me , you write that we agree on most
> points .
> The difference between us is that i Believe that Every Human has basic
> rights to live and toselfdetermination.

No, we agree on that. I guess you forgot to read my reply?

> And i believe that True
> believers in those rights don`t start specifying if this rights are
> also for certain groups!!!

It sounds like you just said that people that believe in basic human
rights don't actually *proclaim* that they believe in those basic
human rights.

If that’s really what you said then we disagree on that point.

> thus by your 4 questions you are asking of people to make differences
> between humans,

If they are basic they apply to everyone. The folks that are making
"differences" are folks that refuse to answer in the affirmative for
certain groups that they happen to hate. Groups like Palestinians, or
Jews, or Blacks, or Italians.

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 12, 2009, 5:16:57 PM5/12/09

to

On May 12, 1:43 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> On May 12, 7:36 pm, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
>
> > mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > You speak unkindly to Deborah and Susan, demanding something that you
> > > don`t demand of yourself.
>
> > Demanding what? All he's asking for is an opinion, and he's freely
> > giving his.
>
> > This is just a discussion, not a policy meeting between world leaders.
>
> This are the sort of questions that are meant to make people look
> bad , what ever they answer

Nonsense. Let's look at the questions again:

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?

3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

The correct answer in each case is "yes." Brownie points and huzzahs
all around for those that say "yes." They are the ones that're look'n
good.

Boos, hisses, and general condemnation for those that answer "no," or
try to evade the questions by changing the subject, etc. Those are
the ones that're look'n "bad."

> , since either one believes All have the
> same rights ,

All people *do* have the same rights.

> but is aware that conditions in life aren`t always the
> same [example quality of life in Usa and Africa !!]

There's a difference between what a person should have, and what they
actually get. Sadly, not all people are treated equally, but they
certainly *should* be treated equally, and they certainly have the
right to demand equal treatment.

The questions are meant to smoke out bigots (and they’ve smoked out
quite a few!). Bigots are people that (among other things) think that
some groups of people are inherently endowed with fewer rights/
privileges than other people.

B. Cramer

unread,

May 12, 2009, 7:04:43 PM5/12/09

to

Now you're applying jew rules to the debate. How very typical of you.

B. Cramer

unread,

May 12, 2009, 7:05:17 PM5/12/09

to

mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> On May 12, 7:36 pm, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
>> mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
>>> You speak unkindly to Deborah and Susan, demanding something that
>>> you don`t demand of yourself.
>>
>> Demanding what? All he's asking for is an opinion, and he's freely
>> giving his.
>>
>> This is just a discussion, not a policy meeting between world
>> leaders.
>
> This are the sort of questions that are meant to make people look
> bad ,

Only the guilty, jew slag. Only the guilty.

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 13, 2009, 12:41:13 AM5/13/09

to

On 11-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 11, 1:27�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On �8-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 7, 9:26�pm, dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>The mystery is
> > > > >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
> > > > >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
> >
> > > > Excepting when the advocates are antisemites,
> >
> > > Are you antisemitic, Deborah? �If not, do you think Susan should
> > > answer the following questions with "yes?"
> >
> > Gee, am I kicking your carapace
>
>
> Susan, are you willing, yet, to answer "yes" to these questions?

Stop lying.

You have lied about everything that it is possible to
lie about in this thread - Israel, Judaism, what was
said, what wasn't said, &, most tellingly, about every
Jew who has challenged your lies. And when
challenged on your lies & bigotry, you have done
nothing but lie more. Your posts are archived for
all to see: you will never escape your bigotry.

Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 13, 2009, 9:34:08 AM5/13/09

to

On May 12, 9:41 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 11-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 1:27 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > On 8-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 7, 9:26 pm, dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>The mystery is
> > > > > >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
> > > > > >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
>
> > > > > Excepting when the advocates are antisemites,
>
> > > > Are you antisemitic, Deborah? If not, do you think Susan should
> > > > answer the following questions with "yes?"
>
> > > Gee, am I kicking your carapace
>
> > Susan, are you willing, yet, to answer "yes" to these questions?
>
> Stop lying.
>
> You have lied about everything that it is possible to
> lie about in this thread - Israel, Judaism,

It's clear enough who hates Judaism, Susan. I have no difficulty
answering "yes" to each of these questions. But you have refused:

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.

Why won't you?

> what was
> said, what wasn't said, &, most tellingly, about every
> Jew who has challenged your lies. And when
> challenged on your lies & bigotry, you have done
> nothing but lie more. Your posts are archived for
> all to see: you will never escape your bigotry.
>

> Susan- Hide quoted text -

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 13, 2009, 12:02:31 PM5/13/09

to

On 13-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 12, 9:41�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On 11-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On May 11, 1:27�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > > On �8-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > On May 7, 9:26�pm, dsharavi <dshara...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>r...@somis.org (R. L. Measures) wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>The mystery is
> > > > > > >>>>>>>where did his anti-S come from?
> > > > > > >>>>>Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>Advocating for Palestinian rights is not anti-Semitic.
> >
> > > > > > Excepting when the advocates are antisemites,
> >
> > > > > Are you antisemitic, Deborah? �If not, do you think Susan should
> > > > > answer the following questions with "yes?"
> >
> > > > Gee, am I kicking your carapace
> >
> > > Susan, are you willing, yet, to answer "yes" to these questions?
> >
> > Stop lying.
> >
> > You have lied about everything that it is possible to
> > �lie about in this thread - Israel, Judaism,
>
> It's clear enough who hates Judaism, Susan.

Yes, you. Thanks!

Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 13, 2009, 1:46:57 PM5/13/09

to

On May 13, 9:02 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

I can answer "yes" to each of these questions. And I do.

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.

Why won't you?

>

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 13, 2009, 10:04:19 PM5/13/09

to

On 13-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

And, yet again, the hypocrite changes the subject.
But I have done better than what you had no right
to demand - & that's what burns you up.

Susan

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 13, 2009, 11:32:43 PM5/13/09

to

Mr Duwaynea
> > In your former answer to me , you write that we agree on most
> > points .
> > The difference between us is that i Believe that Every Human has basic
> > rights to live and toselfdetermination.
>
> No, we agree on that. I guess you forgot to read my reply?

Yes basicly we agreed , but when i mentioned quality of life , you
stated you hope for it, i really WANT it for all .

>
> It sounds like you just said that people that believe in basic human
> rights don't actually *proclaim* that they believe in those basic
> human rights.

In case You forgot i said/wrote that If you agree that EVERY HUMAN has
rights , that specifying CErtain groups in your questions , is
Wrong ,
Asking about spesific groups [ racial/religious /ideological] Takes
them out of being part of EVERY HUMAN persons !!!! Once you put the
question like that , it enables you to point fingers blame and do all
kinds of things , relating it to this group you mentioned.
Human rights people should Not differ amongst groups.

> If they are basic they apply to everyone. The folks that are making
> "differences" are folks that refuse to answer in the affirmative for
> certain groups that they happen to hate. Groups like Palestinians, or
> Jews, or Blacks, or Italians.

No!the people refuse To answer this questions because they are
Demagoguical They are built to paint the one asking them as if he is
kind of moralistic person , while those asked so called lack this
Great Truth !!!!
You also overlook the realistic fact that many people , know persons
who will fit into all several groups,,, thus it is just plain
argumentative .
mirjam

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 13, 2009, 11:47:41 PM5/13/09

to

Mr Duweynea

>
> Nonsense. Let's look at the questions again:

why should i look at this questions ?
I stated that Every Human has the same rights and that should be
enough .
During my life i worked /taught people and Never asked them what their
background was , unless they told me that they can not study certain
subjects . And than we had to workl out how and what we can teach or
not.
This is called respecting self determination , Not pushing your
deffinition of what rights are or aren`t .
Some groups cover heads , some groups can`t eat everything , some
groups can`t speak about certain subjects .. i have worked with
classes that included members of all those groups in one class ,,,
and we all found a way to work together. We all learned from each
other.

> The correct answer in each case is "yes." Brownie points and huzzahs
> all around for those that say "yes." They are the ones that're look'n
> good.
>
> Boos, hisses, and general condemnation for those that answer "no," or
> try to evade the questions by changing the subject, etc. Those are
> the ones that're look'n "bad."

I think that those who write /ask pose such questions are the ,who
either look for reasons to fight /to incite or are unrealistic and
have no clue how the world is .

> All people *do* have the same rights.

Once we agree that , there is no need to specify groups Unless DEEP
down You do make differences between people , by race /religion
etc....

> The questions are meant to smoke out bigots (and they’ve smoked out
> quite a few!). Bigots are people that (among other things) think that
> some groups of people are inherently endowed with fewer rights/
> privileges than other people.

The Bigotry starts with asking this questions as you stated them !!!!

mirjam

mir...@actcom.co.il

unread,

May 13, 2009, 11:51:49 PM5/13/09

to

> 1) Do Jews have the right to live?
> 2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> 3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> 4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
>
> Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
>

This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
questions !!!
mirjam

B. Cramer

unread,

May 14, 2009, 1:55:29 AM5/14/09

to

No they are not. They are humanitarian questions. Humanitarianism is an
alien concept to yids.

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 14, 2009, 2:03:06 AM5/14/09

to

On 13-May-2009, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:

As deborah so rightly pointed out - when the *demand*
is "Answer "yes" or else", they are NOT questions.

They *would* be moral questions if DuWaynea was in any
position to ask them, or if I had *actually* placed myself
in a position where they could legitimately be damned of
me. But neither is the case, and he well knows it.

Susan

B. Cramer

unread,

May 14, 2009, 5:13:32 AM5/14/09

to

<fla...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:uuOOl.988$wR5...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net...

>
> On 13-May-2009, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
>
>> > 1) Do Jews have the right to live?
>> > 2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
>> > 3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
>> > 4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
>> >
>> > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
>> >
>>
>> This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
>> questions !!!
>
> As deborah so rightly pointed out - when the *demand*
> is "Answer "yes" or else", they are NOT questions.

They are to moral, ethical, decent people, zionazi cunt.

�R. L. Measures

unread,

May 14, 2009, 9:46:56 AM5/14/09

to

In article
<70904e54-b64d-4cc1...@v17g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:

> > 1) =A0Do Jews have the right to live?
> > 2) =A0Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> > 3) =A0Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> > 4) =A0Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

> >
> > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
> >
>
> This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
> questions !!!
> mirjam

� Not only that, the lack of specificity makes them loaded political
questions.

As I see it, Jewish religious fanatics or Muslim religious fanatics who
murder do not have the right to live.

--
R.L. Measures. 805-386-3734, www.somis.org

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 9:57:23 AM5/14/09

to

On May 13, 8:32 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> Mr Duwaynea> > In your former answer to me , you write that we agree on most
> > > points .
> > > The difference between us is that i Believe that Every Human has basic
> > > rights to live and toselfdetermination.
>
> > No, we agree on that. I guess you forgot to read my reply?
>
> Yes basicly we agreed , but when i mentioned quality of life , you
> stated you hope for it, i really WANT it for all .

So do I. The point I was trying to make is that "rights" are
something we agree on in principal. They are what "should" exist.

In reality people don't always have the rights they should have, and
that's where good people need to step in and correct the situation.

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 9:59:27 AM5/14/09

to

A rambling, incoherent attempt to change the subject isn't a "better"
answer to these questions than "yes," Susan.

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any decent, moral person would say "yes."

Why won't you?

> than what you had no right
> to demand - & that's what burns you up.
>

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 10:00:13 AM5/14/09

to

Nothing is mor "moral" than the right to live and the right to self
determination.

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 10:00:55 AM5/14/09

to

On May 13, 11:03 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> On 13-May-2009, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > 1) Do Jews have the right to live?
> > > 2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> > > 3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> > > 4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
>
> > > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
>
> > This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
> > questions !!!
>
> As deborah so rightly pointed out - when the *demand*
> is "Answer "yes" or else", they are NOT questions.

Feel free to answer any way you want, Susan. But a rambling,

incoherent attempt to change the subject isn't a "better" answer to

these questions than "yes."

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any decent, moral person would say "yes."

Why won't you?

>

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 14, 2009, 2:05:08 PM5/14/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 13, 11:03�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On 13-May-2009, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > > 1) �Do Jews have the right to live?
> > > > 2) �Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> > > > 3) �Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> > > > 4) �Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
> >
> > > > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
> >
> > > This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
> > > questions !!!
> >
> > As deborah so rightly pointed out - when the *demand*
> > is "Answer "yes" or else", they are NOT questions.
>
> Feel free to answer any way you want, Susan.

Thanks for admitting that you *are* arrogant when you demand a different
answer ---

> But a rambling,
> incoherent attempt to change the subject

[sni rest of lies]

If it was "rambling & incoherent", how could you
"know" it was a "change of subject"?
You really have to learn that your lies will always
trip you up.

Susan

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 14, 2009, 2:09:37 PM5/14/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

When will you learn that your lies will always trip you up?
If it was, indeed "rambkling & incohertent",
how could you alsoeven pretend to know that it was
supposedly "an attempt to change the subject"?

I realize just how stupid you are, but even you can't be
so stupid as to think you are fooling anyone but you.

You have done nothing but lie throughout this entire thread -
About Israel, about Judaism, what was said/not said - and
about every Jew & non-Jew who has refused to let your hate
-filled lies go unchallenged.

Go ahead - continue to expose yourself; the rest of us will
just laugh.

Susan

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 14, 2009, 2:10:25 PM5/14/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

And nothing is more immoral than for you to pretend you
actually care about them while proving you don't.

Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 2:10:55 PM5/14/09

to

On May 14, 11:05 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 13, 11:03 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > On 13-May-2009, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > > > 1) Do Jews have the right to live?
> > > > > 2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> > > > > 3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> > > > > 4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
>
> > > > > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
>
> > > > This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
> > > > questions !!!
>
> > > As deborah so rightly pointed out - when the *demand*
> > > is "Answer "yes" or else", they are NOT questions.
>
> > Feel free to answer any way you want, Susan.
>
> Thanks for admitting that you *are* arrogant when you demand a different
> answer ---
>
> > But a rambling,
> > incoherent attempt to change the subject
>
> [sni rest of lies]
>
> If it was "rambling & incoherent", how could you
> "know" it was a "change of subject"?

Because that's what rambling, incoherent responses do.

> You really have to learn that your lies will always
> trip you up.

Look, the situation is really very simple. These are questions about
the most basic human rights.

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any decent/moral person would answer them in the affirmative. Why
won't you, Susan?

RabbiJoekerr

unread,

May 14, 2009, 3:01:46 PM5/14/09

to

On May 12, 6:46 am, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> I have read this `exchange` and would like to add some thoughts.
> because one can see how you throw together elements that might be
> connected in certain historical/ geographical conditions , but don`t
> have
> to be connected other historical/geographical conditions ,
>
> Does Every Human person have a right to live ? Yes we hope so. and we
> should ask more , Does every human have the right to a Decent life:
> with
> proper food, housing, medical care of sorts and education for the
> children. Because Millions of people all over the world live in
> poverty ,
> illnes , lack of housing etc.... it is up to each of us to seek out
> those
> people who live near to him/her and try and better their lives a
> little.
> I am sure Mr Duwaynea that before you went out to the big world, to
> solve
> it`s problems, you saw to it that you helped as many poor people in
> your
> country/continnent. And now with the experience of having helped your
> poor
> people, you come to teach us.
>
> All humans have the right to self determination. there is no doubt
> about
> that , people can determine their faith, their names etc .
>
> Sometimes self determination is connected or can be connected to a
> demand
> or possibility of a homeland , But they are not always NORE NECCESARY
> Connected to each other ,
> Shomronites , Druze, Bedouins, Bahai , Valons, Cherkesh, Kar`aytes,
> Coptics , Corsicans, Scots, Welsh , Aboriginals, Eskimo , Kurds ,
> Amish ,
> Flemish etc....ALL have the Right for Self determination , but they
> have
> no Homeland. Some are spread over a continent , some are minorities in
> 1
> or several countries. Contemporary culture teaches us toaccept the
> right

Also there are other problems with this "self-determination"... it is
limited in all respects. One cannot simply state that their right
trumps the rights of the others... nor does this right remove
responsibility of any sort as is suggested by these trolls. The oft
mis-quoted/mis-used international law argument is a good example of
how these matters are distorted by the dishonest and please note that
they also claim that Israeli fire is indiscriminate- where as the
terrorist never know where or what they are firing at the IDF has a
specific target and the fact that these "self determined terrorists"
have chosen to use human shields makes them entirely responsible...
not that thses racists care for the truth in any way means shape or
form!

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 10:47:53 PM5/14/09

to

On May 14, 11:10 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

Who know how committed anyone is, except the person that can't even
bring herself to answer "yes" to the most basic humanitarian
questions:

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any ethical/moral person would answer yes.

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 10:53:10 PM5/14/09

to

On May 14, 11:09 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

It's rambling, not "rambkling."

> how could you alsoeven pretend to know that it was
> supposedly "an attempt to change the subject"?

You missed a space between "also" and "even."

Tell you what, Susan. If I'm so wrong about your rambling and
incoherent "answer" why don't you just repeat it?

Oh. That's right. I already extended that invitation and you turned
it down. You must think it was too rambling and incoherent to risk
repeating.

>
> I realize just how stupid you are, but even you can't be
> so stupid as to think you are fooling anyone but you.

Ad hominem noted.

But let's not forget these important questions:

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any ethical/moral person would say yes.

Why won't you, Susan?

>
> You have done nothing but lie throughout this entire thread -
> About Israel, about Judaism, what was said/not said - and
> about every Jew & non-Jew who has refused to let your hate
> -filled lies go unchallenged.
>
> Go ahead - continue to expose yourself; the rest of us will
> just laugh.
>

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 14, 2009, 10:55:34 PM5/14/09

to

On May 13, 8:47 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> Mr Duweynea
>
> > Nonsense. Let's look at the questions again:
>
> why should i look at this questions ?

Because you think it's not appropriate to ask them?

> I stated that Every Human has the same rights and that should be
> enough .

I agree. That should be enough.

> During my life i worked /taught people and Never asked them what their
> background was , unless they told me that they can not study certain
> subjects . And than we had to workl out how and what we can teach or
> not.

The questions are only a big deal because there are nasty bigots on
ARM that apparently think the answers are all "no."

dsharavi

unread,

May 14, 2009, 11:15:44 PM5/14/09

to

Yasher koach!

Kol tuv,
Deborah

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 12:32:18 AM5/15/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > If it was "rambling & incoherent", how could you
> > "know" it was a "change of subject"?
>
> Because that's what rambling, incoherent responses do.

As if we needed further proof as to what a
desperately projecting moron you are.

You really think you get to redefine *everything*
that proves what an idiot you are!

Susan

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 12:34:14 AM5/15/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > When will you learn that your lies will always trip you up?
> > If it was, indeed "rambkling & incohertent",
>
> It's rambling, not "rambkling."

Thanks for proving with the lowest of all flames -
the "typo kamne" that you have ABOSLUTELY NOTHING.
You never did, of course - but now even you are noticing it.

& to think that now I'm going to have to return the favor,
to once again rub your snout in your hypocrisy...

Susan

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 12:34:50 AM5/15/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 14, 11:10�am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 13, 8:51�pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > > > 1) �Do Jews have the right to live?
> > > > > 2) �Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> > > > > 3) �Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> > > > > 4) �Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
> >
> > > > > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
> >
> > > > This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
> > > > questions !!!
> > > > mirjam
> >
> > > Nothing is mor "moral" than the right to live and the right to self
> > > determination.
> >
> > And nothing is more immoral than for you to pretend you
> > actually care about them while proving you don't.
>
> Who know how committed anyone is, except the person that can't even
> bring herself to answer "yes" to the most basic humanitarian
> questions:

Because, as has been pointed out to liars before, I did better than that.

You falsely assigned me a position based on your own hatred and lies, &
then demanded that I answer it. It was only after I answered it in a way
that did not kowtow to your bigotry, & indicted you as you deserved, that
you threw yet another tantrum & proceeded to continue in the insane belief
that you get to dictate to people, along with getting to lie about Israel,
Judaism & every Jew who protests your bigotry. Go ahead - continue to

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 1:06:36 AM5/15/09

to

On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 13, 8:47�pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > Mr Duweynea
> >
> > > Nonsense. �Let's look at the questions again:
> >
> > why should i look at this questions ?
>
> Because you think it's not appropriate to ask them?

Of course it's not papropriate for Jew-haters to pretend
that Jews actually even need to be asked these questions
when said Jews never evinced any evidence of needing it.
I've said it all along - tho' perhaps not in such tiny words.
Maybe that's what you needed?

My bad!

Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 9:39:21 AM5/15/09

to

On May 14, 9:34 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 14, 11:10 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 13, 8:51 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > > > > 1) Do Jews have the right to live?
> > > > > > 2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
> > > > > > 3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
> > > > > > 4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?
>
> > > > > > Any moral/ethical person would say "yes," Susan.
>
> > > > > This are not ethical nore moral questions this are POLITICAL
> > > > > questions !!!
> > > > > mirjam
>
> > > > Nothing is mor "moral" than the right to live and the right to self
> > > > determination.
>
> > > And nothing is more immoral than for you to pretend you
> > > actually care about them while proving you don't.
>
> > Who know how committed anyone is, except the person that can't even
> > bring herself to answer "yes" to the most basic humanitarian
> > questions:
>
> Because, as has been pointed out to liars before, I did better than that.

There is no better answer to these simple humanitarian questions than
"yes."

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would answer with a "yes."

Why won't you, Susan?

>

> You falsely assigned me a position based on your own hatred and lies, &
> then demanded that I answer it. It was only after I answered it in a way
> that did not kowtow to your bigotry, & indicted you as you deserved, that
> you threw yet another tantrum & proceeded to continue in the insane belief
> that you get to dictate to people, along with getting to lie about Israel,
> Judaism & every Jew who protests your bigotry. Go ahead - continue to
> expose yourself; the rest of us will just laugh.
>

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 9:47:31 AM5/15/09

to

On May 14, 9:34 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > When will you learn that your lies will always trip you up?
> > > If it was, indeed "rambkling & incohertent",
>
> > It's rambling, not "rambkling."
>
> Thanks for proving with the lowest of all flames -

Actually, I was making the point that you were rambling at that
moment, yet the rambling nature of your answer is still
understandable.

Now, you did respond to these questions (below). But your response
then (as last night) was a rambling and incoherent attempt to change
the subject. You clearly understand that, because you've refused to
repeat your answer. I can't say I blame you. It's an embarrassment.

But seriously. These are questions about basic human rights -- and
the only good answer is "yes."

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would answer with a "yes."

Why won't you, Susan?

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 9:48:58 AM5/15/09

to

On May 14, 10:06 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 13, 8:47 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > Mr Duweynea
>
> > > > Nonsense. Let's look at the questions again:
>
> > > why should i look at this questions ?
>
> > Because you think it's not appropriate to ask them?
>
> Of course it's not papropriate for Jew-haters

Advocating for human rights doesn't make a person a "Jew hater."

> to pretend
> that Jews actually even need to be asked these questions

I'd ask them of anyone. And, besides, you're not a Jew.

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would answer with a "yes."

Why won't you, Susan?

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 10:28:21 AM5/15/09

to

Stop lying. You were not asking questions but projecting
your own bigotry onto those who had exposed it.

> than
> "yes."

None better to those who insist others kowtow to their bigotry,
and who squeal like stuck pigs when indicted for it.

You are a sad, sad loser.

Susan

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 10:32:51 AM5/15/09

to

On 15-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 14, 9:34�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > When will you learn that your lies will always trip you up?
> > > > If it was, indeed "rambkling & incohertent",
> >
> > > It's rambling, not "rambkling."
> >
> > Thanks for proving with the lowest of all flames -
>
>
> Actually, I was making the point that you were rambling at that
> moment,

No, you were resorting to a "typo lame" because you
knew you had lost the argument long ago.

And, as usual you were lying, since you pretended
all sorts of contradictory things - that included.

> yet the rambling nature of your answer is still
> understandable.

And yet you also pretended it was "incoherent"
"Incoherent" and "understandable" are antnymos.

Face it - your lies are just tripping you up harder & harder.

Susan

fla...@verizon.net

unread,

May 15, 2009, 10:35:35 AM5/15/09

to

On 15-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <Duwayne...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 14, 10:06�pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On May 13, 8:47�pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > > Mr Duweynea
> >
> > > > > Nonsense. �Let's look at the questions again:
> >
> > > > why should i look at this questions ?
> >
> > > Because you think it's not appropriate to ask them?
> >
> > Of course it's not papropriate for Jew-haters
>
> Advocating for human rights doesn't make a person a "Jew hater."

Of course not - but you weren't doing that, as was fairly obvious
by the fact that you:

a) only "asked" the "questions" as a poor attempt to shield your
own bigotry from scrutiny by trying to project it onto others

b) refused to accept answers other than your own narrow design.

"Answer yes or else" makes it NOT a question - as has been
pointed out by more than one person.

c) refused to acknowledge that the answer I gave was far better
than just "yes"

d) lied about that answer to avoid admitting what a bigot you really are.

Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 1:46:46 PM5/15/09

to

On May 15, 7:28 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

That's not a lie. It really is true that there is no better answer to
these simple humanitarian questions than "yes."

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would answer them with a "yes."

Why won't you, Susan?

> You were not asking questions but projecting

> your own bigotry onto those who had exposed it.
>
> > than
> > "yes."
>
> None better to those who insist others kowtow to their bigotry,
> and who squeal like stuck pigs when indicted for it.
>
> You are a sad, sad loser.
>

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 1:47:16 PM5/15/09

to

On May 14, 9:32 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > If it was "rambling & incoherent", how could you
> > > "know" it was a "change of subject"?
>
> > Because that's what rambling, incoherent responses do.
>
> As if we needed further proof as to what a
> desperately projecting moron you are.

Ad hominem noted.

>
> You really think you get to redefine *everything*
> that proves what an idiot you are!

Further ad hominem noted.

>
> Susan

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 1:48:12 PM5/15/09

to

On May 15, 7:32 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 15-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 14, 9:34 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > When will you learn that your lies will always trip you up?
> > > > > If it was, indeed "rambkling & incohertent",
>
> > > > It's rambling, not "rambkling."
>
> > > Thanks for proving with the lowest of all flames -
>
> > Actually, I was making the point that you were rambling at that
> > moment,
>
> No, you were resorting to a "typo lame"

See, there you go again. Rambling.

Meanwhile the really important questions go un-answered by you with a
"yes."

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would answer them with a "yes."

Why won't you, Susan?

Duwaynea Anderson

unread,

May 15, 2009, 1:49:10 PM5/15/09

to

On May 15, 7:35 am, flav...@verizon.net wrote:

> On 15-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 14, 10:06 pm, flav...@verizon.net wrote:
> > > On 14-May-2009, Duwaynea Anderson <DuwayneAnder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 13, 8:47 pm, mir...@actcom.co.il wrote:
> > > > > Mr Duweynea
>
> > > > > > Nonsense. Let's look at the questions again:
>
> > > > > why should i look at this questions ?
>
> > > > Because you think it's not appropriate to ask them?
>
> > > Of course it's not papropriate for Jew-haters
>
> > Advocating for human rights doesn't make a person a "Jew hater."
>
> Of course not

Glad you agree with me there.

> - but you weren't doing that,

Susan, these questions really are about basic human rights.

1) Do Jews have the right to live?
2) Do Palestinians have the right to live?
3) Do Jews have the right to self determination?
4) Do Palestinians have the right to self determination?

Any moral/ethical person would answer them with a "yes."

Why won't you, Susan?

> as was fairly obvious

Moslem cartoon character mohammed was a paedophile 6th century warlord and goat fucker who cooked up a false religion in order to supplement brutality as a means of bringing people under subjection

unread,

May 15, 2009, 5:43:19 PM5/15/09

to

Moslem cartoon character mohammed was a paedophile 6th century warlord
and goat fucker who cooked up a false religion in order to supplement

HOW TO BECOME A SHITSKIN MOSLEM - this is how: fuck goats, fuck your
mother (nikomak), molest children, wear a beekeepers outfit all the
time, never shower or bath, beat your wives, learn terrorist activities
at a maddrassa, wipe your ass with stones, sell the donkey you fucked to
a nearby village, marry a nine year-old , send your child off to an
indoctrination camp, practice thighing with little kids, ............
Practice all those and you too could become a prophet !!

Elif air ab tizak mohammad !!!!

helpi...@gmail.co.za
helpi...@gmail.com
nextsapr...@gmail.com
in...@muslimmatch.com or apa...@muslimmatch.com or
Achmat.S...@gmail.com
fa...@telkomsa.net
ipc...@yebo.co.za
politic...@googlegroups.com
jam...@islamsa.org.za
ds...@mweb.co.za
fes...@wn.apc.org
arah...@gmail.com
jami...@lantic.co.za
sanh...@sanha.org.za
sanh...@sanha.org.za
sanh...@sanha.org.za
help...@sanha.org.za
islamwa...@googlegroups.com
furti...@gmail.com
niy...@msn.com
niy...@hotmail.com

** Posted from LINKdotNET -Jordan **
http://www.link.net
Cybertrust Australia Pty Ltd
Fastlink, Jordan
moslem cartoon character mohammad and his bumchum allaah were child
molesting goat fuckers and nikomaks

_
/'_/)
,/_ /
/ /
/'_'/' '/'__'7,
/'/ / / /" /_\
('( ' /' ')
\ /
'\' _.7'
\ (
\ \