Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Douggie's irrelevant idiocies

1 view
Skip to first unread message

John William Chambless

unread,
Feb 24, 1994, 4:30:35 PM2/24/94
to
In article <CLpDz...@ra.nrl.navy.mil>,
Bryan Dorland <dor...@asimov.nrl.navy.mil> wrote:

>: he acts and writes like a Nazi--just as you do, Herr Shitslinger. The
> ^^^^
>Do you understand what 'Nazi' means, or do just sort of throw it around?

Brian, Brian -- must I tell you EVERYTHING?

"Nazi" is usenetese for "Him who agrees not with my rantings".
It's most effective when rational argument has failed, but some experts
say that it's always in good taste.

You could say that it's the dry white wine of stupid discussions--it
goes with everything.

[ followups to soc.women,alt.alien.visitors,comp.lang.c,talk.politics,
talk.politics.armenia,rec.food.vegetarian ]

--
* Billy Chambless "Someone you care about is an idiot"
* President and founder of DIMSA (Dimwits, Idiots, Morons Stupidly Aggregated)
* "Duh!" -- Mike Dahmus
* GAT -d+ -p+ c++ l u++ e+ s/+ n--- h* g+ w+ t++@ x++ && BOFH

Mike Steiner

unread,
Feb 25, 1994, 3:29:06 AM2/25/94
to
In Article <2kj69r$b...@whale.st.usm.edu>, cham...@whale.st.usm.edu (John

William Chambless) wrote:
>In article <CLpDz...@ra.nrl.navy.mil>,
>Bryan Dorland <dor...@asimov.nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
>
>>: he acts and writes like a Nazi--just as you do, Herr Shitslinger. The
>> ^^^^
>>Do you understand what 'Nazi' means, or do just sort of throw it around?
>
>Brian, Brian -- must I tell you EVERYTHING?
>
>"Nazi" is usenetese for "Him who agrees not with my rantings".
>It's most effective when rational argument has failed, but some experts
>say that it's always in good taste.

In this case, it was a person who was homophobic, demeaned women, and was
anti-Semitic. You're right that rational argument failed; the guy was
unable to engage in one.

Next time you try to tell Brian something, try to be a bit more accurate.
==============================================================================
| Mike Steiner | Someone you care about |
| ste...@netcom.com | is lesbian or gay |
|GAT d+(-)@ -p+ c++@ l- u--- e+@ m++(*)@ s-/+ n@ h--- f+(?) g+ w+ t+@ r-@ y+ |
==============================================================================

Bryan Dorland

unread,
Feb 25, 1994, 11:32:23 AM2/25/94
to
Mike Steiner (ste...@netcom.com) wrote:
: In Article <2kj69r$b...@whale.st.usm.edu>, cham...@whale.st.usm.edu (John

: William Chambless) wrote:
: >In article <CLpDz...@ra.nrl.navy.mil>,
: >Bryan Dorland <dor...@asimov.nrl.navy.mil> wrote:
: >
: >>: he acts and writes like a Nazi--just as you do, Herr Shitslinger. The
: >> ^^^^
: >>Do you understand what 'Nazi' means, or do just sort of throw it around?
: >
: >Brian, Brian -- must I tell you EVERYTHING?
: >
: >"Nazi" is usenetese for "Him who agrees not with my rantings".
: >It's most effective when rational argument has failed, but some experts
: >say that it's always in good taste.

: In this case, it was a person who was homophobic, demeaned women, and was
: anti-Semitic. You're right that rational argument failed; the guy was
: unable to engage in one.

While I seriously doubt that he expressed all of these sentiments (although
I do believe that it is likely that he expressed these), this still does
not constitute a Nazi. Why don't you think up something more accurate.

: Next time you try to tell Brian something, try to be a bit more accurate.

Yeah...he should use you as the paradigm, right?

Bryan

0 new messages