Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Announcement

5 views
Skip to first unread message

Ben Wolfson

unread,
Dec 30, 2002, 9:20:42 PM12/30/02
to
Due to unforeseen circumstances, the schedule change that was to have taken
place on Jan 3rd 2003 has been moved back to Jan 8th 2003. All other
schedule changes will occur as planned.

--
You're going to set me up as a kind of slovenly attached pig that
Jack Kornfeld can slice down in his violent zen compassion?
-- Larry Block

Daniel Buettner

unread,
Dec 30, 2002, 10:24:00 PM12/30/02
to
Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> Due to unforeseen circumstances, the schedule change that was to have taken
> place on Jan 3rd 2003 has been moved back to Jan 8th 2003. All other
> schedule changes will occur as planned.

What about the parade on Sunday? Has that been postponed as
well?


--
~
~
~
"Daniel Buettner" line 4 of 4 --100%--

Ben Wolfson

unread,
Dec 30, 2002, 10:57:40 PM12/30/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:20:42 GMT, Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu>
wrote:

>Due to unforeseen circumstances,
^^^^^^

MY MEANING "OWING TO" WAS CAUSED BY PLONK!

Jeremy Impson

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 10:18:02 AM12/31/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Ben Wolfson wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:20:42 GMT, Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu>
> wrote:
>
> >Due to unforeseen circumstances,
> ^^^^^^
>
> MY MEANING "OWING TO" WAS CAUSED BY PLONK!

^^^^^^^^^

YM"DUE TO".


--Jeremy

--

Jeremy Impson
jdim...@acm.org
http://impson.tzo.com/~jdimpson

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 11:42:14 AM12/31/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:18:02 GMT, Jeremy Impson <jdim...@acm.org>
wrote:

>On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Ben Wolfson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:20:42 GMT, Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Due to unforeseen circumstances,
>> ^^^^^^
>>
>> MY MEANING "OWING TO" WAS CAUSED BY PLONK!
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
>YM"DUE TO".
>

The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
that you never begin a sentence with "because."

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Sometimes I almost feel/Just like a human being"

Nicko

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 12:29:35 PM12/31/02
to

"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:18:02 GMT, Jeremy Impson <jdim...@acm.org>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:20:42 GMT, Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Due to unforeseen circumstances,
> >> ^^^^^^
> >>
> >> MY MEANING "OWING TO" WAS CAUSED BY PLONK!
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >YM"DUE TO".
> >
> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> that you never begin a sentence with "because."

Why?

--
YOP...


Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 2:47:59 PM12/31/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:29:35 -0600, Nicko
<strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:


>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:

>> >
>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>
>Why?
>

Why ask why? Few rules of the English language are logical or
explicable. In fact, if you were designing a language from the ground
up, you'd come up with something much more logical than English.

However illogical, this rule about never beginning a sentence with
"because" is one of the few hard-and-fast rules in English, along with
its corallary about never beginning a sentence with a coordinating
conjunction (and, but, for, or, nor, yet, so).

I don't make the rules, Nick. I just enforce them.

Jeremy Impson

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 2:52:27 PM12/31/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Kevin S. Wilson wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 15:18:02 GMT, Jeremy Impson <jdim...@acm.org>
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 02:20:42 GMT, Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Due to unforeseen circumstances,
> >> ^^^^^^
> >>
> >> MY MEANING "OWING TO" WAS CAUSED BY PLONK!
> > ^^^^^^^^^
> >
> >YM"DUE TO".
> >
> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> that you never begin a sentence with "because."

OK then. I'll try again...

YM"PLONK BECUASED ME TO MEAN ``OWING TO''".

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 3:03:42 PM12/31/02
to
Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:

>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
>>
>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>
>Why?


Because.


-=D=-
_________________________________________________
"Any time you think you might be eating poo, stop."
---Ifaz, rec.food.cooking
_________________________________________________
http://www.yougotta.com/Darla
_________________________________________________

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 3:09:50 PM12/31/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:03:42 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
Vladschyk) wrote:

>Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
>
>>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
>>>
>>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>>
>>Why?
>
>Because.
>

Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
grammatically complete sentence.

Ben Wolfson

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 3:12:01 PM12/31/02
to
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:09:50 GMT, res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) wrote:

>On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:03:42 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
>Vladschyk) wrote:
>
>>Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
>>
>>>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>>>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>>>
>>>Why?
>>
>>Because.
>>
>Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
>sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
>grammatically complete sentence.

No, she should have said "the reason is that I said so", thereby foiling
Nicko's low plans.

Glenn Knickerbocker

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 3:39:29 PM12/31/02
to
"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
> However illogical, this rule about never beginning a sentence with
> "because" is one of the few hard-and-fast rules in English, along with
> its corallary about never beginning a sentence with a coordinating
> conjunction (and, but, for, or, nor, yet, so).

Bu-but that's OK. Be-be-because Nicko would never start a sentence with
"and" all by its lonesome.

ŹR

Nicko

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 5:05:24 PM12/31/02
to

Glenn Knickerbocker wrote:

I NEVER DID!


Beable van Polasm

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 8:13:43 PM12/31/02
to
res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) writes:

> On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:03:42 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
> Vladschyk) wrote:
>
> >Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
> >
> >>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> >>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
> >>
> >>Why?
> >
> >Because.
> >
> Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
> sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
> grammatically complete sentence.

No it isn't, because a sentence ends with a FULL STOP, not a COMMA!
PLONG!K!

--
cheers
Beable van Polasm
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
http://beable.com

James Vandenberg

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 8:44:11 PM12/31/02
to
Beable van Polasm said:
> res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) writes:
>
> > On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:03:42 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
> > Vladschyk) wrote:
> >
> > >Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
> > >
> > >>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> > >>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
> > >>
> > >>Why?
> > >
> > >Because.
> > >
> > Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
> > sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
> > grammatically complete sentence.
>
> No it isn't, because a sentence ends with a FULL STOP, not a COMMA!
> PLONG!K!

NOT FOLLOWING YOUR OWN RULES BY ENDING YOUR SENTENCE WITH A BANG RATHER
THAN A FULL STOP.

!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!(P)(L)(O)(N)(K)!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
James Vandenberg Email: james at vandenberg.dropbear.id.au
GPG FP= 65AB 179A D884 EDC6 216D FE6A 6833 02BC 4425 4F70
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. ICQ: 151135390
Beware! Sometimes forks and candles fall from the sky.

Beable van Polasm

unread,
Dec 31, 2002, 9:09:32 PM12/31/02
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> writes:

> Beable van Polasm said:
> > res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) writes:
> > > Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
> > > sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
> > > grammatically complete sentence.
> >
> > No it isn't, because a sentence ends with a FULL STOP, not a COMMA!
> > PLONG!K!
>
> NOT FOLLOWING YOUR OWN RULES BY ENDING YOUR SENTENCE WITH A BANG RATHER
> THAN A FULL STOP.
>
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> !!!!!(P)(L)(O)(N)(K)!!!!!!
> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

BUT AT LEAST I DIDN'T END MY SENTENCE WITH A COMMA! ALSO IT WASN'T
A SENTENCE, IT WAS AN EXCLAMATION YOU BOZO!!! PLONK!

Bryce Utting

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 12:22:19 AM1/1/03
to
Beable van Polasm <bea...@NOS.PAM.beable.com.THANKS> wrote:
>> > No it isn't, because a sentence ends with a FULL STOP, not a COMMA!
>> > PLONG!K!
>>
>> NOT FOLLOWING YOUR OWN RULES BY ENDING YOUR SENTENCE WITH A BANG RATHER
>> THAN A FULL STOP.
>>
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>> !!!!!(P)(L)(O)(N)(K)!!!!!!
>> !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> BUT AT LEAST I DIDN'T END MY SENTENCE WITH A COMMA! ALSO IT WASN'T
> A SENTENCE, IT WAS AN EXCLAMATION YOU BOZO!!! PLONK!

MISTAKING AN EJACULATION FOR AN EXCLAMATION PRRRLLLLLLOOOOORNKKK!!!!!


butting

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 12:54:33 AM1/1/03
to
res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) wrote:

>On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:03:42 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
>Vladschyk) wrote:
>
>>Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
>>
>>>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>>>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>>>
>>>Why?
>>
>>Because.
>>
>Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
>sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
>grammatically complete sentence.

Yes, Kevin.

poin...@achtung.mil

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 3:34:44 AM1/1/03
to
Nicko <strutterman@I_Like_Ike.gov> wrote:
> I NEVER DID!

Now everybody--

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 8:08:09 AM1/1/03
to
On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 05:54:33 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
Vladschyk) wrote:

>res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 20:03:42 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
>>Vladschyk) wrote:
>>
>>>Nicko <strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>>>>> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>>>>
>>>>Why?
>>>
>>>Because.
>>>
>>Sorry, Darla, but you lose. "Because" is not a grammatically complete
>>sentence. You should've said, "Because I said so," which is a
>>grammatically complete sentence.
>
>Yes, Kevin.
>

Oh, c'mon, Darla. I spend good money on this bait. At least nibble at
it.

David DeLaney

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 1:40:13 PM1/1/03
to
Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:

><strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
>>Why?
>>
>Why ask why? Few rules of the English language are logical or
>explicable. In fact, if you were designing a language from the ground
>up, you'd come up with

Esperanto?

APL?

Pr\"edicate calculus?

>something much more logical than English.

Oh. Never mind.

Dave "let's see yer literary license, sir; you were doing 60 wpm in a free-
prose zone" DeLaney
--
\/David DeLaney posting from d...@vic.com "It's not the pot that grows the flower
It's not the clock that slows the hour The definition's plain for anyone to see
Love is all it takes to make a family" - R&P. VISUALIZE HAPPYNET VRbeable<BLINK>
http://www.vic.com/~dbd/ - net.legends FAQ & Magic / I WUV you in all CAPS! --K.

Jim Vandewalker

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 4:29:26 PM1/1/03
to
In article <3e11c8bf...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Kevin S. Wilson
<res...@spro.net> wrote:

> >
> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> that you never begin a sentence with "because."

Because I respect your superior knowledge in this area, I will hew to
your line. And I will urge others to do the same.

--
Jim the Dead Guy

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 5:12:36 PM1/1/03
to

That's good to hear. It's about time someone around here started
following my advice.

Rose Marie Holt

unread,
Jan 1, 2003, 11:39:06 PM1/1/03
to
In article <010120031630448576%jim.van...@verizon.net>,
Jim Vandewalker <jim.van...@verizon.net> wrote:

"Ass Kissing"

PLONFGK!

Beable van Polasm

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 4:44:51 AM1/2/03
to

HEY! TOW THE LINE, HOLT! Kevin is the acknowledged English language
expert around here! If we want to know about doctoring stuff, we
ask you. And if we want to know about English pedantry, we ask
Zixia^h^h^h^h^h Kevin.

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 7:14:02 AM1/2/03
to
Beable van Polasm said:
> Rose Marie Holt <rmh...@mindspring.com> writes:
> >
> > In article <010120031630448576%jim.van...@verizon.net>,
> > Jim Vandewalker <jim.van...@verizon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > In article <3e11c8bf...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Kevin S. Wilson
> > > <res...@spro.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> > > > that you never begin a sentence with "because."
> > >
> > > Because I respect your superior knowledge in this area, I will hew to
> > > your line. And I will urge others to do the same.
> >
> > "Ass Kissing"
>
> HEY! TOW THE LINE, HOLT! Kevin is the acknowledged English language
> expert around here! If we want to know about doctoring stuff, we
> ask you. And if we want to know about English pedantry, we ask
> Zixia^h^h^h^h^h Kevin.

ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1

Apologies to any experts not recognised, add your name to the list in
followups or something. Or if you do other stuff, please tell. It's
late, I'm tired, and I'm feeling forgetful.

If you want to know about | then ask:
---------------------------+------------------
Typography | Kibo Himself
English Language | Kevin's Wilson
Medical stuffs | Rose Marie Holt
English Pedantry | Zixia????? Kevin
Raising Perfect Kids | Paula
Weird Diseases | Tamara
Physics, Jokes | Matt McIrvin
Chilli, Gift cats | Conmidhe
VAXen | Jarai
Hollywood insider | Stephenls
ArkMOO programming | Jwgh
Karoke | Tim Chmielewski
Battletractors | John Burrage
Weblogging, barcaloungers | Jorn Barger
Chatroom-like typing | Darla Vladschyk
Cancer cures or something | Joe M. Bay
Philosophy (I think) | Plorkwort
|
POSSIBLE EXPERTS: |
---------------------------+------------------
Scientific Proof of God | George Hammond
Cursed Theories | Kurt Stocklmier
Geometry (Cubes) | Gene Ray

Please add to the list!

Ja-recognised-expert-in-self-name-mutilation-mes

Jere Kahanpaa

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 8:56:45 AM1/2/03
to

PLONKing K.S. Wilson
CAPS!! Lots42
Finland Dag Ã…gren
Cheese ... open ...
Classic Macs ... open ...

Someone dispenses clever, and sometimes even relevant, Python advice here, but I
cannot recall the name.

Jere
--
It's hard to think outside the box when you ARE the box.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 11:22:59 AM1/2/03
to
On 02 Jan 2003 19:44:51 +1000, Beable van Polasm
<bea...@NOS.PAM.beable.com.THANKS> wrote:

>Rose Marie Holt <rmh...@mindspring.com> writes:
>>
>> In article <010120031630448576%jim.van...@verizon.net>,
>> Jim Vandewalker <jim.van...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> > In article <3e11c8bf...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Kevin S. Wilson
>> > <res...@spro.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > > >
>> > > The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>> > > that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>> >
>> > Because I respect your superior knowledge in this area, I will hew to
>> > your line. And I will urge others to do the same.
>>
>> "Ass Kissing"
>
>HEY! TOW THE LINE, HOLT!

Nice try, Beable. (I will admit, however, that Jim got me to look up
"hew to your line.")

> Kevin is the acknowledged English language
>expert around here! If we want to know about doctoring stuff, we
>ask you. And if we want to know about English pedantry, we ask
>Zixia^h^h^h^h^h Kevin.

You misspelled "pederasty" and then somehow confused my name with
Zixia's.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho

"You can safely ignore Kevin in order to
maximise life's experience." --A. Loon, in alt.religion.kibology

Chris McGonnell

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 12:10:53 PM1/2/03
to
"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote ...

> On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:29:26 GMT, Jim Vandewalker
> <jim.van...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
> >In article <3e11c8bf...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Kevin S. Wilson
> ><res...@spro.net> wrote:
> >
> >> >
> >> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
> >> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
> >
> >Because I respect your superior knowledge in this area, I will hew to
> >your line. And I will urge others to do the same.
> >
> That's good to hear. It's about time someone around here started
> following my advice.

HAW HAW! Swilson is puny tech writer, not REAL writer! HULK SMASH PUNY
SWILSON! Why? BECAUSE!

--
Chris McG.
Harming humanity since 1951
Uh-oh. Looners. -- Darla


-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 12:13:59 PM1/2/03
to
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:10:53 -0500, "Chris McGonnell"
<sme...@key-net.net> wrote:

>"Kevin S. Wilson" wrote ...
>> On Wed, 01 Jan 2003 21:29:26 GMT, Jim Vandewalker
>> <jim.van...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <3e11c8bf...@News.CIS.DFN.DE>, Kevin S. Wilson
>> ><res...@spro.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> >
>> >> The word you're both looking for is "because." However, everyone knows
>> >> that you never begin a sentence with "because."
>> >
>> >Because I respect your superior knowledge in this area, I will hew to
>> >your line. And I will urge others to do the same.
>> >
>> That's good to hear. It's about time someone around here started
>> following my advice.
>
>HAW HAW! Swilson is puny tech writer, not REAL writer!

I'll have you know that in addition to being a tech writer, I'm also a
successfully unpublished novelist. So there.

>HULK SMASH PUNY
>SWILSON! Why? BECAUSE!

Puny? You haven't seen pictures of my fat ass, have you?

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho

HarCo Industries

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 2:05:03 PM1/2/03
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote in message news:<slrnb18aim...@fraktal.localnet>...

>
> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>
> Apologies to any experts not recognised, add your name to the list in
> followups or something. Or if you do other stuff, please tell. It's
> late, I'm tired, and I'm feeling forgetful.
>
> If you want to know about | then ask:
> ---------------------------+------------------
> Typography | Kibo Himself
> English Language | Kevin's Wilson
> Medical stuffs | Rose Marie Holt
> English Pedantry | Zixia????? Kevin
> Raising Perfect Kids | Paula
> Weird Diseases | Tamara
> Physics, Jokes | Matt McIrvin
> Chilli, Gift cats | Conmidhe
> VAXen | Jarai
> Hollywood insider | Stephenls
> ArkMOO programming | Jwgh
> Karoke | Tim Chmielewski
> Battletractors | John Burrage
> Weblogging, barcaloungers | Jorn Barger
> Chatroom-like typing | Darla Vladschyk
> Cancer cures or something | Joe M. Bay
> Philosophy (I think) | Plorkwort
Plankton, UN | Beable
Weather | Not James Vandenberg

Paula

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 3:41:52 PM1/2/03
to
HarCo Industries <tdwi...@earthlink.net> wrote:

Horsies | That BITCH Terri

If you want illustrations of any of the above, ask the Dead Guy.


--
Paula
When life hands you lemons, get out your trebuchet.

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 8:14:03 PM1/2/03
to
Some more

> If you want to know about | then ask:
> ---------------------------+------------------

Number conspiracies | Leo
Aliens | John_-_Winston

leo sgouros

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 8:21:16 PM1/2/03
to
James Vandenberg wrote:
> Some more
>
>
>>If you want to know about | then ask:
>>---------------------------+------------------
>
> Number conspiracies | Leo
> Aliens | John_-_Winston
>
>

I dont believe in any conspiracies with numbers, nor have you asked a
single question about them that I can recall.
If you want to know whats going on here, I would advise NOT asking
"James Vandenberg".

cheers, whoever the fuck you are

Jacob W. Haller

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 9:31:13 PM1/2/03
to
leo sgouros <hpa...@comcast.net> wrote:

> James Vandenberg wrote:
> >>If you want to know about | then ask:
> >>---------------------------+------------------
> > Number conspiracies | Leo
> > Aliens | John_-_Winston
>
> I dont believe in any conspiracies with numbers,

How about 'numbers about conspiracies'?

> If you want to know whats going on here, I would advise NOT asking "James
> Vandenberg".
>
> cheers, whoever the fuck you are

This should have been:

| If you want to know what's going on here, I would advise NOT asking
| "Ja-whoever-the-fuck-you-are-mes Vandenberg".

Anyway, I propose:

+------------------------------+----------------------+
| fine cuisine techniques | Archimedes Plutonium |
| Archimedes Plutonium | Joe Manfre |
| mittens | Daniel Buettner |
+------------------------------+----------------------+

-jwgh

--
"I still wish I looked like Shania Twain. And sang like somebody else."
- Paula <mmmtoblerone at earthlink.ent> in alt.religion.kibology
9 Dec 2002 <1fmw7bm.1uzgtrw1dvbxm4N%mmmtob...@earthlink.ent>

Theresa Willis

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 9:49:13 PM1/2/03
to
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 20:41:52 GMT, mmmtob...@earthlink.ent (Paula)
wrote:

Being a BITCH | Tab-damaged Paula

leo sgouros

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 9:52:08 PM1/2/03
to

Jacob W. Haller wrote:
> leo sgouros <hpa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>>James Vandenberg wrote:
>>
>>>>If you want to know about | then ask:
>>>>---------------------------+------------------
>>>
>>>Number conspiracies | Leo
>>>Aliens | John_-_Winston
>>
>>I dont believe in any conspiracies with numbers,
>
>
> How about 'numbers about conspiracies'?

How about 'magic in a young girls' heart?

>
>
>>If you want to know whats going on here, I would advise NOT asking "James
>>Vandenberg".
>>
>>cheers, whoever the fuck you are
>
>
> This should have been:
>
> | If you want to know what's going on here, I would advise NOT asking
> | "Ja-whoever-the-fuck-you-are-mes Vandenberg".
>


This should have been
If you WANT to KNOW whats GOING ON here, I would advise NOT ASKING


> Anyway, I propose:
>
> +------------------------------+----------------------+
> | fine cuisine techniques | Archimedes Plutonium |
> | Archimedes Plutonium | Joe Manfre |
> | mittens | Daniel Buettner |
> +------------------------------+----------------------+
>
> -jwgh
>

Anyway I propose


Cheers I the california raisins

Rose Marie Holt

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 10:01:34 PM1/2/03
to
In article <av1get$3bh$1...@oravannahka.helsinki.fi>,
Jere Kahanpaa <kaha...@gstar.astro.helsinki.fi> wrote:


Boston Public Library: Don Saklad
Anger Management: Stacia

Stacia

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 10:36:04 PM1/2/03
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> writes:

>ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1

>Apologies to any experts not recognised, add your name to the list in
>followups or something. Or if you do other stuff, please tell. It's
>late, I'm tired, and I'm feeling forgetful.

>If you want to know about | then ask:
>---------------------------+------------------
>Typography | Kibo Himself

[snip]

Ouch. Thanks, asshole. This was a really roundabout way of telling me
I'm not good for anything.

* * *
Stacia * sta...@world.std.com * http://world.std.com/~stacia/
"Well, you could dip your nipples in ink,
and write a short story."

Jacob W. Haller

unread,
Jan 2, 2003, 11:02:13 PM1/2/03
to
Stacia <sta...@world.std.com> wrote:

> Ouch. Thanks, asshole. This was a really roundabout way of telling me
> I'm not good for anything.

+---------------------------------------------+--------+
| Dipping nipples in ink, writing short story | Stacia |
| Making stupid lists | jwgh |
+---------------------------------------------+--------+

David DeLaney

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 12:17:35 AM1/3/03
to
Jacob W. Haller <sp...@jwgh.org> wrote:
>+---------------------------------------------+--------+
>| Dipping nipples in ink, writing short story | Stacia |
>| Making stupid lists | jwgh |
>+---------------------------------------------+--------+

Physics; Magic; certain kinds of sexxx; DSL; various small-time subjects;
dreams about surreal architecture; Walls of Books; etc. | dave

Dave "Romanovsky and/or Phillips; math; Isaac Asimov; etc..." DeLaney

Paula

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 12:44:00 AM1/3/03
to
Theresa Willis <tdwi...@earthlink.net> wrote:

> > Horsies | That BITCH Terri
> >
> Being a BITCH | Tab-damaged Paula

Curses! Foiled again! Can't you just let me beat you at something some
time, PLEEEZE?!

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 12:51:49 AM1/3/03
to
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 05:44:00 GMT, mmmtob...@earthlink.ent (Paula)
wrote:

>Theresa Willis <tdwi...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> > Horsies | That BITCH Terri
>> >
>> Being a BITCH | Tab-damaged Paula
>

>Curses! Foiled again! Can't you just let me beat you some
>time, PLEEEZE?!

You had a couple extra words in that last sentence. I fixed it for
you. HTH.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 1:44:04 AM1/3/03
to
David DeLaney said:
> Jacob W. Haller <sp...@jwgh.org> wrote:
> >+---------------------------------------------+--------+
> >| Dipping nipples in ink, writing short story | Stacia |
> >| Making stupid lists | jwgh |
> >+---------------------------------------------+--------+
>
> Physics; Magic; certain kinds of sexxx; DSL; various small-time subjects;
> dreams about surreal architecture; Walls of Books; etc. | dave

How about I just put you down as all round genious, kay?

Ja-and-leave-something-for-other-people-mes

Jeremy Impson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 3:09:05 AM1/3/03
to

Is it possible to mention leo in a post without him getting mad at you?

--Jeremy

--

Jeremy Impson
jdim...@acm.org
http://impson.tzo.com/~jdimpson

revjack

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 8:48:07 AM1/3/03
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
: Some more

:> If you want to know about | then ask:
:> ---------------------------+------------------
: Number conspiracies | Leo
: Aliens | John_-_Winston

Yummy Crunchy Hate | Stacia

--
___________________
rev...@revjack.net

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 11:44:48 AM1/3/03
to
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 08:09:05 GMT, Jeremy Impson <jdim...@acm.org>
wrote:

>Is it possible to mention leo in a post without him getting mad at you?
>

Yes. Watch this:

If you are using the LDS 1880 Census Index, you can convert the page
numbers used there to the filenames (Enumeration District and page
number) used for the S-K Publications census images by consulting the
S-K Conversion Table for that county.
http://www.skpub.com/genie/1880/

Issues searched:
November/ December 2002
You searched by: Page Number
Listings found: 47 items found.
http://www.mediabrains.com/Client/NorrisW/LM1/lm/default.asp?searchby=page

Word 404 in the New Testament lexicon, for example, means "refresh"
which is the HTML command used in custom 404 error pages to forward
the page to an appropriate index.
http://www.greaterthings.com/Word-Number/teaser.htm

Those of us who understand what's going on (and that includes Leo)
will understand why these three quotations are important. Further
information will be posted as the situation warrants.

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho

Stacia

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 1:14:39 PM1/3/03
to
Rose Marie Holt <rmh...@mindspring.com> writes:

>> Cheese ... open ...

>Anger Management: Stacia

Nuts. I thought I was going to get the lucrative Cheese Expert
position, which would make Baby Kibo cry from sheer happiness and nausea.
Anything to get him back to the group, though.

"it's the department of explodiations, sir.
we've come to detonate your buttocks."

Ben Wolfson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 1:41:02 PM1/3/03
to
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:14:02 GMT, James Vandenberg
<ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

>Beable van Polasm said:

>> HEY! TOW THE LINE, HOLT! Kevin is the acknowledged English language
>> expert around here! If we want to know about doctoring stuff, we
>> ask you. And if we want to know about English pedantry, we ask
>> Zixia^h^h^h^h^h Kevin.

I don't recognize as an English pedant (by which I mean someone whose
pedantry includes the English language) anyone who doesn't distinguish
between "owing to" and "due to".

>ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1

>Philosophy (I think) | Plorkwort

Isn't Luke Brainy a freakin' philosophy major? LIKE ME, I might add.

--
You're going to set me up as a kind of slovenly attached pig that
Jack Kornfeld can slice down in his violent zen compassion?
-- Larry Block

Ben Wolfson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 1:42:09 PM1/3/03
to
On 2 Jan 2003 13:56:45 GMT, Jere Kahanpaa
<kaha...@gstar.astro.helsinki.fi> wrote:

>Someone dispenses clever, and sometimes even relevant, Python advice here, but I
>cannot recall the name.

That might be me. Anyway I'm willing to claim that it's me. Did you know
that you can customize Emacs with Python? Yay!

Daniel Buettner

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 2:08:14 PM1/3/03
to
Ben Wolfson <wol...@midway.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> On 2 Jan 2003 13:56:45 GMT, Jere Kahanpaa
> <kaha...@gstar.astro.helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
>>Someone dispenses clever, and sometimes even relevant, Python advice here, but I
>>cannot recall the name.
>
> That might be me. Anyway I'm willing to claim that it's me. Did you know
> that you can customize Emacs with Python? Yay!

No, I bet he was thinking of Beable. IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT YOU
WITH YOU ISN'T IT YOU YOU SO AND SO?!?


--
~
~
~
"Daniel Buettner" line 4 of 4 --100%--

Glenn Knickerbocker

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 2:20:46 PM1/3/03
to
Daniel Buettner wrote:
> No, I bet he was thinking of Beable. IT'S ALWAYS ABOUT YOU
> WITH YOU ISN'T IT YOU YOU SO AND SO?!?

Worst Peter Hammill song ever.

ŽR

definitely what

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 3:19:30 PM1/3/03
to
In article <3e11f3b8...@news.cis.dfn.de>,

Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:29:35 -0600, Nicko
><strutterman@never_mind_teh_bollocks.sid> wrote:
>>Why?
>Why ask why?

ANSWERING A QUESTION WITH ANOTHER QUESTION! DOUBLE-PLONK-UNGOOD!

rone
--
New from the makers of Li'l Swimmers: Li'l Eaters. Edible underwear
that looks just like Mommy's and Daddy's! - Kibo

definitely what

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 3:36:50 PM1/3/03
to
In article <slrnb18aim...@fraktal.localnet>,

James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> If you want to know about | then ask:
> ---------------------------+------------------
> English Language | Kevin's Wilson
> English Pedantry | Zixia????? Kevin

I scoff greatly. I think i was pedantifying English when Mr. Wilson
was still correcting his fellow babies on the proper inflection for
the "I wet myself" scream.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 4:03:58 PM1/3/03
to
On 3 Jan 2003 12:36:50 -0800, "definitely what" <^#*&$@ennui.org>
wrote:

>In article <slrnb18aim...@fraktal.localnet>,
>James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>> If you want to know about | then ask:
>> ---------------------------+------------------
>> English Language | Kevin's Wilson
>> English Pedantry | Zixia????? Kevin
>
>I scoff greatly. I think i was pedantifying English when Mr. Wilson
>was still correcting his fellow babies on the proper inflection for
>the "I wet myself" scream.
>

Then you need to send Darla a more recent picture, Sonny. At least my
pic accurately reflects my middle-aged girth and grizzled world-weary
visage. Plus, you'll note that I'm not dressed for waiting tables,
unlike some people I could name.

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 5:25:55 PM1/3/03
to
Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:

>.... At least my


>pic accurately reflects my middle-aged girth and grizzled world-weary
>visage. Plus, you'll note that I'm not dressed for waiting tables,
>unlike some people I could name.

Where is my GIF, Swilson? Why can't I have that GIF? Do I have to
telephone your wife?

-=D=-
_________________________________________________
"Any time you think you might be eating poo, stop."
---Ifaz, rec.food.cooking
_________________________________________________
http://www.yougotta.com/Darla
_________________________________________________

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 5:50:45 PM1/3/03
to
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003 22:25:55 GMT, DarlaVl...@hotmail.com (Darla
Vladschyk) wrote:

>Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:
>
>>.... At least my
>>pic accurately reflects my middle-aged girth and grizzled world-weary
>>visage. Plus, you'll note that I'm not dressed for waiting tables,
>>unlike some people I could name.
>
>Where is my GIF, Swilson? Why can't I have that GIF? Do I have to
>telephone your wife?
>

Telephoning won't do any good. She shook her head sadly when I tried
explaining that this woman in Canadia had my picture on her website
along with pictures of my other invisible friends but she now wanted
another picture of me wearing coveralls and a toolbelt, standing
alongside my truck.

You give me a couple good reasons why you want/need/covet such a
picture and we'll see what can be done. Fair enough?

PS: I'm not fishing for compliments. I really am curious as to what
this particular image has triggered within you to cause such dogged
determinination. Plus, I'm hoping the turn this thread has taken is
causing a vein to throb in the side of Jorn's head.

Beable van Polasm

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 6:11:48 PM1/3/03
to
Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> writes:

> On 3 Jan 2003 12:36:50 -0800, "definitely what" <^#*&$@ennui.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >I scoff greatly. I think i was pedantifying English when Mr. Wilson
> >was still correcting his fellow babies on the proper inflection for
> >the "I wet myself" scream.
>
> Then you need to send Darla a more recent picture, Sonny. At least my
> pic accurately reflects my middle-aged girth and grizzled world-weary
> visage. Plus, you'll note that I'm not dressed for waiting tables,
> unlike some people I could name.

Kevin is a real roll model for us all!

--
cheers
Beable van Polasm
Perl 6 will give you the big knob. -- Larry Wall
http://beable.com

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 7:28:56 PM1/3/03
to
Ben Wolfson said:
> >ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>
> Isn't Luke Brainy a freakin' philosophy major? LIKE ME, I might add.

Ok.

Useless degrees | Luke Breinig, Ben Wolfson.

Happy now?

Ja-happy?-what-does-it-mean-to-be-happy?-mes

talysman

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 7:38:15 PM1/3/03
to
Beable van Polasm <bea...@NOS.PAM.beable.com.THANKS> writes:

> Kevin is a real roll model for us all!

^^^^
doll

I think you are confusing two similar words, as well as spewing
your FILTH all over unsenet!

talysman

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 7:39:19 PM1/3/03
to
"definitely what" <^#*&$@ennui.org> writes:

> In article <slrnb18aim...@fraktal.localnet>,
> James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > If you want to know about | then ask:
> > ---------------------------+------------------
> > English Language | Kevin's Wilson
> > English Pedantry | Zixia????? Kevin
>
> I scoff greatly. I think i was pedantifying English when Mr. Wilson
> was still correcting his fellow babies on the proper inflection for
> the "I wet myself" scream.

geesh! kevin's wilson's is like SEVENTY YEARS OLD, so you
must be the oldest freakin' waiter in the universe!

Jeremy Impson

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 10:00:37 PM1/3/03
to

HAW HAW rone trolled all y'all. See he was talking in notional Internet
years.

definitely what

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 10:43:48 PM1/3/03
to
In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.03010...@monster.apt.net>,

Jeremy Impson <jdim...@acm.org> wrote:
>HAW HAW rone trolled all y'all. See he was talking in notional Internet
>years.

GOLD STAR FOR YOU!!!

rone
"HIIIII! I'LL GIVE ANYONE A GOLD STAR FOR NINENYNINE-NINENYFIVE!"

Darla Vladschyk

unread,
Jan 3, 2003, 11:04:34 PM1/3/03
to
Kevin S. Wilson <res...@spro.net> wrote:

>You give me a couple good reasons why you want/need/covet such a
>picture and we'll see what can be done. Fair enough?

1. The whole fetishy image just makes me hot.

It is important to note that I wouldn't covet the image so much if it
were of, say, Ja-I'm-so-young-I-still-smell-of-Pablum-mes, or of
NickB, or even of the late lamented Teg Pipes. This is a *mature*
fantasy. It needs a mature man to make it work.

This is not a reason that is going to sit well with your wife,
however. So:

1. I need it to illustrate a work-related project having to do with
FEMA, OSHA, and AARP.

2. It's for a scavenger hunt organized by old ladies.


Okaythanks!

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 1:14:03 AM1/4/03
to
Darla Vladschyk said:
> were of, say, Ja-I'm-so-young-I-still-smell-of-Pablum-mes, or of

I smell of what?

Ja-I'm-officially-an-adult,-by-two-years,-so-nyah-mes

PS: I also think there are younger kibologists on here, like maybe the
Hollywood Insider.

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 1:28:56 AM1/4/03
to
James Vandenberg said:
> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1

I thought of a position for Stacia!

> Tornado baiting | Stacia

Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes

Theresa Willis

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 8:29:27 AM1/4/03
to
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:28:56 GMT, James Vandenberg
<ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

>James Vandenberg said:
>> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>
>I thought of a position for Stacia!
>
>> Tornado baiting | Stacia
>
>Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes

YOU KNOW. BASTID.

John Burrage

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 9:24:22 AM1/4/03
to
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003 12:14:02 GMT, James Vandenberg
<ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

>ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>

>Apologies to any experts not recognised, add your name to the list in
>followups or something. Or if you do other stuff, please tell. It's
>late, I'm tired, and I'm feeling forgetful.


>
>If you want to know about | then ask:
>---------------------------+------------------

<snip experts>

>Battletractors | John Burrage

I am humbled beyond words, comrade, that my work in the field has been
recognised. The many years of informing on countless miserable
wretches harbouring thoughts contrary to state policies, and also hard
work, have finally paid off.

Also, you should see the 2003 range; some of those battletractors will
take your breath away. Sort of like when a traitor to the working
class is re-educated by wrapping them up in a roll of wet carpet,
which slowly constricts as it dries, making it harder and harder to
breath, finally resulting ... I have already said too much.

>Weblogging, barcaloungers | Jorn Barger
>Chatroom-like typing | Darla Vladschyk
>Cancer cures or something | Joe M. Bay
>Philosophy (I think) | Plorkwort
> |
>POSSIBLE EXPERTS: |
>---------------------------+------------------
>Scientific Proof of God | George Hammond
>Cursed Theories | Kurt Stocklmier
>Geometry (Cubes) | Gene Ray
>
>Please add to the list!

Clear steel: tj frazir (see sig for credentials)


--
John Burrage http://members.iinet.net.au/~burrage/
"Clear steel is going airborn .
The air has no afect on it ,,,but it leaves a bolt in air !
But it will leave a large crator where it Hits. " - tj frazir

John Burrage

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 9:35:52 AM1/4/03
to
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:31:13 -0500, sp...@jwgh.org (Jacob W. Haller)
wrote:

>leo sgouros <hpa...@comcast.net> wrote:


>
>> James Vandenberg wrote:
>> >>If you want to know about | then ask:
>> >>---------------------------+------------------

>> > Number conspiracies | Leo
>> > Aliens | John_-_Winston
>>

>> I dont believe in any conspiracies with numbers,
>

>How about 'numbers about conspiracies'?


>
>> If you want to know whats going on here, I would advise NOT asking "James
>> Vandenberg".


OK then ...GEORGE HAMMOND, what's going on around here?

I bet he doesn't even reply. At least James is civil enough to reply.


>> cheers, whoever the fuck you are

Worst Subway ad ever. NO, best potential Subway ad ever. And then
Jared could get shot in the gut by Harvey Keitel, lying there in
incredible pain slowly dying! Brilliant! TAKE NOTE, LAME ARSE SUBWAY
AD MAKERS! IT WOULD WORK BECAUSE EVERYONE HATES JARED! SIMPLE CONCEPT!

Jesus, they don't even bother to dub the voices in the Subway ads here
in Austria. Not that there's anything wrong with that PER SE, but one
gets used to the grating, annoying nasally twang of an Austrian
accent.


>
>| mittens | Daniel Buettner |

Staplers, methinks.

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 9:42:22 AM1/4/03
to
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:28:56 GMT, James Vandenberg
<ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

>James Vandenberg said:
>> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>
>I thought of a position for Stacia!
>
>> Tornado baiting | Stacia
>

At the apprentice or master level?

--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho

"Sometimes I almost feel/Just like a human being"

Kevin S. Wilson

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 10:28:37 AM1/4/03
to
On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 14:24:22 GMT, bur...@iinet.net.au (John Burrage)
wrote:

>Also, you should see the 2003 range; some of those battletractors will
>take your breath away. Sort of like when a traitor to the working
>class is re-educated by wrapping them up in a roll of wet carpet,
>which slowly constricts as it dries, making it harder and harder to
>breath, finally resulting ... I have already said too much.
>

Izzat true? Not about the battletractors; nobody cares about
battletractors.

But could you kill a guy that way? Where did you hear about it? I need
to know for a science project due on Monday.

definitely what

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 1:34:03 PM1/4/03
to
In article <ihod1vc8k86c6abv1...@4ax.com>,

Theresa Willis <tdwi...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:28:56 GMT, James Vandenberg
><ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes
>
>YOU KNOW. BASTID.

Don't take it personally. It's just his Austrian ways.

rone

Zixia

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 3:23:04 PM1/4/03
to
Paula devised a cunning plan:

> Theresa Willis <tdwi...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> > Horsies | That BITCH Terri
>> >
>> Being a BITCH | Tab-damaged Paula
>
> Curses! Foiled again! Can't you just let me beat you at
> something some time, PLEEEZE?!

I have the PERFECT way for you to get your own back. I happen to know,
for reasons that I had better not divulge, that Terri has a weakness
when competing in the exciting sport of nude female custard wrestling.
If you challenged Terri to a match her pride would not let her turn you
down, and you could beat her NO PROBLEM. You could also web-cast the
event. You know--for posterity, to prove that you beat her.

Actually, who cares about the result? If it were web-cast, we'd ALL be
winners.

--
@+----------------+@
_o)| Verbing Weirds |(o_
/\\| Language |//\
_\_V|________________|V_/_

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 7:13:58 PM1/4/03
to

Some more additions

Theresa Willis | Horses
Jeremy Impson | Misogyny
lcrl | Not bitterness

Schwa Love

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 7:46:46 PM1/4/03
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote in
news:slrnb1eth...@fraktal.localnet:

> Theresa Willis said:
>> On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:28:56 GMT, James Vandenberg
>> <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> >James Vandenberg said:
>> >> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>> >
>> >I thought of a position for Stacia!
>> >
>> >> Tornado baiting | Stacia
>> >
>> >Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes
>>
>> YOU KNOW. BASTID.
>
> Some more additions
>
> Theresa Willis | Horses
> Jeremy Impson | Misogyny
> lcrl | Not bitterness

Wait, you got them reversed I think. Or did you? Are horses really
experts on Theresa Willis? Does Misogyny have a firm grasp of the concepts
behind a Jeremy Impson? Can Not bitterness apply fundamental principals of
lcrl in the real world?

-- Schwa ---

Theresa Willis

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 9:23:37 PM1/4/03
to
On Sun, 05 Jan 2003 00:13:58 GMT, James Vandenberg
<ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

>Theresa Willis said:
>> On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:28:56 GMT, James Vandenberg
>> <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>
>> >James Vandenberg said:
>> >> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>> >
>> >I thought of a position for Stacia!
>> >
>> >> Tornado baiting | Stacia
>> >
>> >Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes
>>
>> YOU KNOW. BASTID.
>
>Some more additions
>
>Theresa Willis | Horses

Only, not really. Dogs, maybe. Dogs who crochet, maybe. Horses I am
still be instructed about.

--Terri

Stacia

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 9:34:13 PM1/4/03
to
res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) writes:
><ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>>James Vandenberg said:

>>> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>>
>>I thought of a position for Stacia!
>>
>>> Tornado baiting | Stacia
>>
>At the apprentice or master level?

Apprentice. Me and my cows haven't been taken by tornadoes yet! And as
long as my carriage gets fifty rods to the hogshead, we ain't gonna get
taken, dadburnit!
In interesting tornado news, my mom, as a child in Missouri, saw her
family's outhouse taken away by a tornado. The rest of the family was in
the underground shelter (just like the kind you see in 'Wizard of Oz') and
didn't realize their doofus middle child was standing on the stairs, with
the shelter door open, watching the pretty pretty tornado.
And of all things to take - the outhouse. That would suck. Sure, take
the chickens, take the pigs, take the George Foreman Grill, but leave my
toilet where it is!

* * *
Stacia * sta...@world.std.com * http://world.std.com/~stacia/
"ALL HANDS PREPARE FOR MULTIBALL!"

James Vandenberg

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 9:43:48 PM1/4/03
to

Nitpicking | Schwa Love

Ja-next-time-I-do-something-like-this,-hit-me-cold-mes

Bryce Utting

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 11:14:54 PM1/4/03
to
Stacia <sta...@world.std.com> wrote:
> In interesting tornado news, my mom, as a child in Missouri, saw her
> family's outhouse taken away by a tornado.

gone with the wind? no shit!


butting (*rimshot*)

Schwa Love

unread,
Jan 4, 2003, 11:20:14 PM1/4/03
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote in
news:slrnb1f6ar...@fraktal.localnet:

> Schwa Love said:
>> James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote in
>> news:slrnb1eth...@fraktal.localnet:
>>
>> > Theresa Willis said:
>> >> On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 06:28:56 GMT, James Vandenberg
>> >> <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >James Vandenberg said:
>> >> >> ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>> >> >
>> >> >I thought of a position for Stacia!
>> >> >
>> >> >> Tornado baiting | Stacia
>> >> >
>> >> >Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes
>> >>
>> >> YOU KNOW. BASTID.
>> >
>> > Some more additions
>> >
>> > Theresa Willis | Horses
>> > Jeremy Impson | Misogyny
>> > lcrl | Not bitterness
>>
>> Wait, you got them reversed I think. Or did you? Are horses really
>> experts on Theresa Willis? Does Misogyny have a firm grasp of the
>> concepts behind a Jeremy Impson? Can Not bitterness apply
>> fundamental principals of lcrl in the real world?
>
> Nitpicking | Schwa Love

Heh. I'm sure there are others that beat me on that one.

-- Schwa ---

Oh crap, I just did it again.

madge

unread,
Jan 5, 2003, 5:24:55 PM1/5/03
to
Nitpicking & S&M | Schwa Love

--
I've been very careful not to do anything unkosher, daring, or cool.

--James ``Kibo'' Parry

John Burrage

unread,
Jan 5, 2003, 8:47:25 PM1/5/03
to
res...@spro.net (Kevin S. Wilson) wrote:

>On Sat, 04 Jan 2003 14:24:22 GMT, bur...@iinet.net.au (John Burrage)
>wrote:
>
>>Also, you should see the 2003 range; some of those battletractors will
>>take your breath away. Sort of like when a traitor to the working
>>class is re-educated by wrapping them up in a roll of wet carpet,
>>which slowly constricts as it dries, making it harder and harder to
>>breath, finally resulting ... I have already said too much.
>>
>
>Izzat true? Not about the battletractors; nobody cares about
>battletractors.

WHAT??

>But could you kill a guy that way? Where did you hear about it? I need
>to know for a science project due on Monday.

Pretty sure I read about it or heard about it on the radio - it was
used as a torture technique rather than a means of killing. A quick
google turned up a heap of sites that look as if they should not be
visited during working hours hem hem so unfortunately I cannot verify
it. Not right now, at least.

"That makes one year to go before I'm headline news
in every newspaper in the world." - George Hammond,
1 July 2002.

Rich Holmes

unread,
Jan 6, 2003, 11:35:59 AM1/6/03
to
James Vandenberg <ja...@vandenberg.dropbear.id.au> writes:

> James Vandenberg said:
> > ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>
> I thought of a position for Stacia!
>
> > Tornado baiting | Stacia
>
> Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes

Melodeon sex | Doctroid

--
- Doctroid Doctroid Holmes <http://www.richholmes.net/doctroid/>

Sewing buttons is just about the easiest thing you can do with a
needle and thread, aside from hurting yourself. -- Ben Wolfson

Bryce Utting

unread,
Jan 6, 2003, 2:50:29 PM1/6/03
to
Rich Holmes <rsholme...@mailbox.syr.edu> wrote:
>> > ARK REGISTERED EXPERTS LIST V0.1
>>
>> Ja-there!-who-else-have-I-left-out?-mes
>
> Melodeon sex | Doctroid

stuffed if I can think of anything -I'm- an expert in. grumblety
years of singleness?


butting

Daniel Buettner

unread,
Jan 11, 2003, 1:06:57 PM1/11/03
to
John Burrage <bur...@iinet.net.au> wrote:

>>| mittens | Daniel Buettner |
>
> Staplers, methinks.

Yes! Staplers! I need more staplers. Maybe one of those
little tiny ones? And I could carry it in a pocket so I'm
NEVER unable to staple.


--
~
~
~
"Daniel Buettner" line 4 of 4 --100%--

Ben Wolfson

unread,
Jan 11, 2003, 2:03:50 PM1/11/03
to
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:06:57 +0000, Daniel Buettner wrote:

> John Burrage <bur...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
>>>| mittens | Daniel Buettner |
>>
>> Staplers, methinks.
>
> Yes! Staplers! I need more staplers. Maybe one of those
> little tiny ones? And I could carry it in a pocket so I'm
> NEVER unable to staple.

My mom has a stapler that looks like a pen, about the thickness of a
fancy-dancy fountain pen. You remove the top and ... it's a stapler! V.
cool.

--
I certainly seem to be enjoying myself in the same way, smacking my
lips, sighing and moaning, dripping [REDACTED] on my shirt and
smearing it into my moustache ... But ... If I snuck a lick of your
cone, I wouldn't smack my lips. -- Ted Cohen

Paula

unread,
Jan 11, 2003, 6:36:42 PM1/11/03
to
Daniel Buettner <buet...@cse.unl.edu> wrote:

> John Burrage <bur...@iinet.net.au> wrote:
>
> >>| mittens | Daniel Buettner |
> >
> > Staplers, methinks.
>
> Yes! Staplers! I need more staplers. Maybe one of those
> little tiny ones? And I could carry it in a pocket so I'm
> NEVER unable to staple.

I won't tell you that I just bought a new stapler and got one of the
itty bitty ones for FREE in the package, then, because I don't want to
make you jealous. BUT, if they add you as an expert in staplers to the
chart, do they then have to add jwgh as an expert in behinds?

--
Paula
When life hands you lemons, get out your trebuchet.

0 new messages