Re: Do you think you're WINNING, Kent?

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:11:52 -0400, Respondant <no...@none.invalid> wrote
in <jkile4$j6g$4...@speranza.aioe.org>:

><vanity and other froups snecked>
>
>
>On 3/23/2012 3:28 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>
>
>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>> Checkmate!
>>
>> First, check out what Greegor said:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Do you think you're WINNING, Kent?
>>
>> Yeah, Kent's winning. Time for you to post some more of YOUR drivel
>> before he gets too far ahead of you.
>
>Honest question because I can't be bothered to google-dive;
>
>Has this Kent/Gregor thing been going on longer than the
>Albatross/Emmett thing?
>
>I am aware that the A/E thing went on hiatus for a while while Emmett
>was in the cooler for a few years a while ago, and that the K/G thing
>went away from AUK for a while as well.
>
>I guess what I'm asking is if the K/G thing kept going in a group other
>than AUK while AUK was 'out of order' for a few years recently.
>
>And if neither of them, what Is/Was the longest-lasting flame-war
>between two individuals, in (the collective) your opinion?
>
>Anyone? Beuler?

Carol v Jabriol 1997 - Present in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn


--

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/

http://blackhelicopternews.blogspot.com/p/award-winners-1994-2012.html

http://fnvw.databasix.com (awards descriptions and more)

[Respondant]

On 3/23/2012 4:15 PM, Fred Hall wrote:


> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 16:11:52 -0400, Respondant<no...@none.invalid> wrote
> in<jkile4$j6g$4...@speranza.aioe.org>:
>
>> <vanity and other froups snecked>
>>
>>
>> On 3/23/2012 3:28 PM, Checkmate wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
>>> Checkmate!
>>>
>>> First, check out what Greegor said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you think you're WINNING, Kent?
>>>
>>> Yeah, Kent's winning. Time for you to post some more of YOUR drivel
>>> before he gets too far ahead of you.
>>
>> Honest question because I can't be bothered to google-dive;
>>
>> Has this Kent/Gregor thing been going on longer than the
>> Albatross/Emmett thing?
>>
>> I am aware that the A/E thing went on hiatus for a while while Emmett
>> was in the cooler for a few years a while ago, and that the K/G thing
>> went away from AUK for a while as well.
>>
>> I guess what I'm asking is if the K/G thing kept going in a group other
>> than AUK while AUK was 'out of order' for a few years recently.
>>
>> And if neither of them, what Is/Was the longest-lasting flame-war
>> between two individuals, in (the collective) your opinion?
>>
>> Anyone? Beuler?
>
> Carol v Jabriol 1997 - Present in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn

Wow. 15 years and counting?. That's even more fucked-up than Alb/Emmett
and Greg/Kent.

For the record, I would like to cast a vote on the side of whomever of
the two dislikes Jehovah Witnesses the most.

7:30 on a Saturday morning? Really?

[Fred Hall]

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:23:30 -0400, Respondant <no...@none.invalid> wrote in
<jkipke$url$1...@speranza.aioe.org>:

Really.

[Greegor]

> >> And if neither of them, what Is/Was the longest-lasting flame-war
> >> between two individuals, in (the collective) your opinion?
> >> Anyone? Beuler?

> > Carol v Jabriol 1997 - Present in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn

> Wow. 15 years and counting?

14 and ended.

Kent tried to insinuate Maureen into that one and Moe
started out playing it coy and acting like she was
PO'd at Kent for trying to drag her into it.
I laughed my ass off at this absurd fakery.

> That's even more fucked-up than Alb/Emmett and Greg/Kent.

At TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking and harassing
one televangelist, Maureen has them all beat!

Maureen McAllister deserves extra points for running
a full blown online CAMPAIGN of stalking and
harassment against an eBay seller for TEN YEARS
after she got her refund. Tell me that's not F'd in the head...

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr1ku07Eybo

[Saba]

"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> skrev i melding
news:55757e3f-0be8-441d...@mq9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

what the hell is your fight about
S

[KabukiBob]

On Mar 24, 1:55 pm, "Saba" <veron...@frisurf.no> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> skrev i meldingnews:55757e3f-0be8-441d...@mq9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>
>
>
> >> >> And if neither of them, what Is/Was the longest-lasting flame-war
> >> >> between two individuals, in (the collective) your opinion?
> >> >> Anyone?  Beuler?
>
> >> > Carol v Jabriol 1997 - Present in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
>
> >> Wow. 15 years and counting?
>
> > 14 and ended.
>
> > Kent tried to insinuate Maureen into that one and Moe
> > started out playing it coy and acting like she was
> > PO'd at Kent for trying to drag her into it.
> > I laughed my ass off at this absurd fakery.
>
> >> That's even more fucked-up than Alb/Emmett and Greg/Kent.
>
> > At TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking and harassing
> > one televangelist, Maureen has them all beat!
>
> > Maureen McAllister deserves extra points for running
> > a full blown online CAMPAIGN of stalking and
> > harassment against an eBay seller for TEN YEARS
> > after she got her refund.  Tell me that's not F'd in the head...
>

> >http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_258656...

>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr1ku07Eybo
>
> what the hell is your fight about
> S

Greegor, simply put, has an obsession about Kent Wills and he attacks
anyone who criticizes greegor,which includes me. I made it plain that
I have no sympathy for a wife and child abuser as Hanson showed
himself to be, so greg's little whiney disortions and outright lies
about me he drags out every few months, particularly after I respond
to his crappy posts in a way he can't respond "rationally". Bear in
mind this is not a rational, erudite person, but one who admits, among
other things that he has Aspergers Syndrome.

His subject title of "longest flame-war" is an inaccurate reference
to my interest in "Christian" Bob E. Larson, currently self-proclaimed
" real exorcist" and in reality con artist and greedy attention-
seeker. As is usual for Hanson, he distorts and lies about the facts
to suit his agenda. Larson is no "televangelist" and has never to my
knowledge described himself as a televangelist,though the closest he
came was " traveling evangelist" in the early 70s. " Flame war" is a
specific internet related term and I didn't have a computer 27 years
ago.

Basically greegeor uses usenet as his personal kitty litter box.

Moe

[siteldaw...@gmail.com]

On Mar 24, 6:55 pm, "Saba" <veron...@frisurf.no> wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> skrev i meldingnews:55757e3f-0be8-441d...@mq9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> >> And if neither of them, what Is/Was the longest-lasting flame-war
> >> >> between two individuals, in (the collective) your opinion?
> >> >> Anyone?  Beuler?
>
> >> > Carol v Jabriol 1997 - Present in alt.religion.jehovahs-witn
>
> >> Wow. 15 years and counting?
>
> > 14 and ended.
>
> > Kent tried to insinuate Maureen into that one and Moe
> > started out playing it coy and acting like she was
> > PO'd at Kent for trying to drag her into it.
> > I laughed my ass off at this absurd fakery.
>
> >> That's even more fucked-up than Alb/Emmett and Greg/Kent.
>
> > At TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking and harassing
> > one televangelist, Maureen has them all beat!
>
> > Maureen McAllister deserves extra points for running
> > a full blown online CAMPAIGN of stalking and
> > harassment against an eBay seller for TEN YEARS
> > after she got her refund.  Tell me that's not F'd in the head...
>

> >http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_258656...

>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr1ku07Eybo
>
> what the hell is your fight about
> S

Perhaps if Kent and Greegor could view those hot pics that you had on
your old
website, Veronique, they would begin making love, not war. If they
could get
Maureen to join in, it would be a threesome. Any chance of you re-
posting those
pics? ;>D

[Greegor]

On Mar 24, 1:55 pm, "Saba" <vero...@frisurf.no> wrote:
> "Greegor" <snip> for brevity

Saba > what the hell is your fight about

You addressed me, Saba. ( Veronique ? )
My fight? Mainly:

1. To refute KentMoe's horrendous lies and half lies about me.
2. To prove Kent's criminal record as motivation for his lies about
me.
3. To expose Kent and his stooge Moe for their LONG history of
cyberstalking and cyberbullying others with campaigns of lies.

4. stop Carol/Jabriol feud - done
5. stop Bob Alberti / Emmett Gulley feud - on hold

6. Exposure of the AUK and anonymous remailer
organized stalking/harassment community

[sirgregoryhall]

CAN I NOT GET MY COCK SUCKED BY ANYONE ON USENET? DO YOU KNOW HOW LONG I
HAVE BEEN IN FLAME WARS NOT AS LONG AS IT HAS BEEN SINCE I HAD MY COCK
SUCKED AND IF MAUREEN GIVES GOOD HEAD ASK HER TO SEND ME HER EMAIL ADDRESS
I WILL PAY UP TO 50 US FOR A GOOD POLE SMOKING thank you and sorry for my
interruption but my balls are aching and sore


--
Sir Gregory

[Greegor]

On Mar 25, 11:47 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:42:52 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>
> <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:

> >On Mar 24, 1:55 pm, "Saba" <veron...@frisurf.no> wrote:
> >> "Greegor" <snip> for brevity
>
> >Saba > what the hell is your fight about
>
> >You addressed me, Saba. ( Veronique ? )
> >My fight? Mainly:
>
> >1. To refute KentMoe's horrendous lies and half lies about me.
>

> 1) Moe and I are not the same person. Your Fregoli may force you
> to believe we are, but we are not.
> Accept this simple TRUTH and move on with your life.

Kent and Maureen may as well be joined at the hip.
Several have called Maureen Kent's excrement eater.

> 2) Neither of us offer anything less that the TRUTH about you.
> Unless you're admitting your own claims about yourself, which we often
> cite and reference, were and are lies.
> You'll also have to admit your own standards, the very standards
> you DEMAND be held to others, were and are nothing more than acts of
> deception.
> Oh wait, you've already admitted this, and do so each time you
> claim the standards I've adopted from you are acts of deception.

Lies tied in Giordian knots.
Kent uses circular ""logic"" a lot.

> >2. To prove Kent's criminal record as motivation for his lies about
> >me.

> Huh?
> Even if I had such a record (you've admitted I do not),

Lie.
That's one right off my chart of Kent's STOCK deceptions.
False claim that his opponent has already conceded something to Kent.

G. Res Judicata 1. Already conceded to Kent's argument

> how would that motive me to lie about you?
> Add that I've never lied about you and your claim is even more
> laughable.
> Do recall YOU claimed the sig about you is as believable as the
> claim that water is wet.

He LIES so much that nobody should
take Kent's word for anything, even if he
claims that water is wet.

> I posted the MID for the post last week. If
> you'd like, I can post it again.

Kent KNOWS that MID's are munged before they
get to me, apparently part of Google's SPAM
prevention software, apparently seeing the
text before and after an @ as an e-mail.
I have asked him to put spaces before and after the @
but Kent has failed to do so the few times he
has supposedly printed a MID as proof.

> >3. To expose Kent and his stooge Moe for their LONG history of
> > cyberstalking and cyberbullying others with campaigns of lies.

> Whom have we stalked? About whom have we lied?
> Be specific when you reply and prepared to have any lies you
> present exposed.
> If you would prefer to admit, by YOUR standards if not openly,
> that another of you MANY lies has been exposed, this is acceptable to
> me.

We've been at this for 7 years, Kent.
Do you REALLY want to pretend that I haven't
told you the names of your previous targets?

> >4. stop Carol/Jabriol feud - done

> So YEARS before you were aware of Carol and/or Antonio, you
> started stalking me and posting whatever lies your mind could dream up
> about me, to get them to cease fighting?
> That's not very plausible.

Is it your Aspergers or your online role playing that
has you believing that your opponents
strategy/goals cannot adapt or change, Kent?

> BTW, you had NOTHING to do with their fight ending. Nothing at
> all. But feel free to prove you did. If your claim is true, you'll
> provide the evidence that proves it. If your claim is a lie, you'll
> offer nothing, but lies.

Are you worried about something, Kent?

> >5. stop Bob Alberti / Emmett Gulley feud - on hold

KBW > Is this the same Bob Alberti/Albatross you claimed is me?

Lie.
Link or lie.

Typical insane claim by Kent.

Less circular that others.

> The same one you KNEW was me because the
> ONLY reason anyone would deny
> he's me is because your claim was correct?
> Unless you mean someone else. If this is the case, you'll need
> to explain why you claimed I was someone you KNEW all along I was not,
> you'll need to show how this feud is to be stopped via your failed
> attempts to stalk and harass me and my family.

Kent is like Emily Litella from Saturday Night Live,
misinterpreting something and going off on wild
tangent rants that are often circular. He seems to
think this sort of grandstanding will help him.

> >6. Exposure of the AUK and anonymous remailer
> > organized stalking/harassment community

> And how, exactly, does your constantly lying about me and/or Moe
> accomplish this ludicrous goal, Greg?

Links to official web sites and your own activity/quotes.
How do links to ONLINE verifiable proof lie, Kent?

> And if you've known that the people of AUK are so bad for so many
> years, why did you start cross-posting to the group?

I just explained that.

> If the group is,
> as you like to dishonestly claim, an organized stalking/harassment
> community, why did you work so hard to get their attention?
> Was it so that you could claim to be a victim?

Your posting volume would do that, wouldn't it?
With the long sig quotes full of falsehoods..

> Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
>
> http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg

Do you REALLY want me to explain what you
have on your own photobucket account, Kent??

> "I am Bob Larson."
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
> as mentally ill as he presents.
> Message-ID:
> <df610804-da3b-4aa8-aad0-638da7588...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

It was a joke about how you see your opponents EVERYWHERE!

And perhaps a bit like "I am Spartacus".

You sure have obsessed about this trivia, Kent.


> A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
> Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
> that water is wet):
>
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
> GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT

A faked Operating While Intoxicated record
where Kent text edited in my DOB and
miraculously left out the CASE NUMBER.

Check out HOW LONG Kent has been posting
this lame fake ""information"".

I have never had an OWI, anywhere, and
I do not a drinker or a drug user.

> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
> Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
> attacking my first wife (deceased).http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead

I was thinking along the lines of ziplock brain surgery (Steve Martin)
and "zipperhead" has NUMEROUS definitions but Kent decided
that HE gets to interpret the writer's definition.
Check out HOW LONG Kent has been posting
this lame. Quoted as sig for YEARS.

> Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
> drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
> alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
> "Of course."

Of course Kent suspects what he dreams up!
Again, repeated over and over FOR YEARS.

> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
> -- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
> abuser

What YEAR was that, Kent? Stuck in time again?
Courts are slow and Family courts are heavily rigged against parents.
Show where I am registered, Kent.

> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
> April 2000, Gregory Hansonhttp://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

Not me. Kent doesn't care. Repeated ad nauseum.

> Path:
> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.goo­gle.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
> Newsgroups:
> misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-pr­otective-services
>
> With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
> into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
> videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
> was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
> water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
> a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
> gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
> were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
> She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
> prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
>
> "Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
> triumphantly.
>
> --a true story

Not me. A really crappy SPORGERY of me.
Quote not my words, not even paraphrased from me.
It was done using one of the Euro servers that Kent
used to use.

> As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
>
> SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
> Comments: OPA $2805.04
> COPIES TO PA
> VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
>
> JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
> Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
> + INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
>
> Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
> TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
> FEES $35.60
>
> Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
> him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
> has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
> can't risk getting a job due to it.

No CASE NUMBER? I have no garnishment order against me.
Kent knew for YEARS that this is a different Greg Hanson.
Kent has repeated this ad nauseum FOR YEARS.

He's tried flooding with sheer VOLUME of posting,
repetition, socks, idiotic arguments and every one
of the below well known deceptions has been
repeated ad nauseum for years.


Kent's stock deceptions/logical fallacies (7/28/2010)

F. Ad Hominem calling opponents
1. Drunks or drunk drivers
2. Druggies or on drugs
3. Mentally Ill often as result of drug use
G. Res Judicata
1. Already conceded to Kent's argument
2. Question already asked and answered.
H. Fallacy of Suppressed Evidence
1a. Missing Middle, False Dilemma, False Dichotomy, bifurcation
1b. Fallacy of Complex Question - loaded question with presupposition
2. Withholding proof saying it's already on the table
3. ""Check is in the mail"" as proof of something.
4. Proof held hostage awaiting opponents proof on something else
5. Claim that a lack of proof disproves something.
6. Claim that a lack of proof proves something.
7. Claim that asking for a LINK PROVES insult XYZ
J. strawman
1. False pretense that opponent made some idiotic argument
2. Lie claimed to be based on opponents standards
K. OUTRIGHT LIE ( doesn't fit other designations )
L. IDENTITY
1. The court records were faked as a prank. ( On 3 official sites? )
2. Anonymity - That's not my name at all!
3. Doppelganger defense - " That was some OTHER Kent B Wills."
4. Never gone to prison ( convict didn't go either! mental case? )

It's as if Kent is an automation that is WAY too simple.

[Greegor]

> >> Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg

G > Do you REALLY want me to explain what you
G > have on your own photobucket account, Kent??

KBW > Sure.  Use as much detail as you wish.

Why do you keep asking me about some
image on YOUR photobucket account, Kent?

>  Other than confirming one of them is Lisa, I haven't a clue about
> any of the women in the picture.

Why is the photo on YOUR photobucket account then Kent?

> Given your deeply rooted
> psychological NEED to lie, I'm still not sure any of the women is the
> Lisa Watkins you mooch off of rather than get a job.

Are you dating her now or what?
Why is the picture on your photobucket account
if you don't even know the person?

Does that make you a WINNER?

[Checkmate]

Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by
Checkmate!

First, check out what Greegor said:


>

Kent's winning.

--
Checkmate
KotAGoR XXXIV
Hammer of Thor, Feb. 2012
Copyright © 2012
all rights reserved

"its usually the lesser intelligent person , that comments
on the more intelligent person's , lack of intelligents"

-Dave Keating, AKA "Squiggles" the assworm, AKA %, explaining
intelligence

[linuxgal]

Greegor wrote:
>
> Kent and Maureen may as well be joined at the hip.
> Several have called Maureen Kent's excrement eater.
>

I don't remember this Greegor from the old days, but I hope he doesn't
have some sort of ministry.

EPH 5:12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done
of them in secret.

[KabukiBob]

He doesn't. He's a little woman and child abusing bastard from alt
child protective services who whined about ho baldy he was treated by
CPS for abusing a seven year old girl for two years, then when no one
there believed his " I'm a victim" con, he started going after people
there. That's where he met Kent and the tick has been latched onto
Kent ever since.

Supposedly Hanson claims to be agnostic.

Moe

[linuxgal]

KabukiBob wrote:

> He doesn't. He's a little woman and child abusing bastard from alt
> child protective services who whined about ho baldy he was treated by
> CPS for abusing a seven year old girl for two years, then when no one
> there believed his " I'm a victim" con, he started going after people
> there. That's where he met Kent and the tick has been latched onto
> Kent ever since.

Thanks. Just wanted to know what he had to do with Mr. Larson. And
the answer is, nada.

[Greegor]

> > > Kent and Maureen may as well be joined at the hip.
> > > Several have called Maureen Kent's excrement eater.
>
> > I don't remember this Greegor from the old days, but I hope he doesn't
> > have some sort of ministry.
>
> > EPH 5:12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done
> > of them in secret.

> He doesn't. He's a little woman and child abusing bastard from alt
> child protective services

That's alt.SUPPORT.child-protective-services,
a SUPPORT group for families battling CPS agencies.

> who whined about ho baldy he was treated by
> CPS for abusing a seven year old girl

In a SUPPORT group for combatting CPS agencies.

Lies, BS and wild exaggerations much like
alt.usenet.kooks are not what any government
agents should be using, especially to tear
families apart without any real basis.

I vindicated myself eventually, even though
the Kangaroo courts they use are stacked
against parents and caretakers accused of
neglect for smoke and mirrors reasons.

> for two years, then when no one
> there believed his " I'm a victim" con,

My assailant plead guilty.

> he started going after people there.

A bitter former caseworker from Oregon
who actually bragged about posting obscene
language for over a year, and several other
"system sucks" cyber squatting saboteurs
posing as family rights advocates.

The ""Child Protection"" INDUSTRY is a huge
governmental lobbying interest involving large
numbers of personnel and BILLIONS of dollars.

They were fakes, bent on maintaining the corrupt
""Child Protection"" INDUSTRY through guerilla
tactics online, like posing as family rights people
doing a sort of "spider" act to sabotage parents.

> That's where he met Kent and the tick has
> been latched onto Kent ever since.

Kent and you voluntarily entered there and
thought you found an easy target.

> Supposedly Hanson claims to be agnostic.

Yup.

Not religious, though respectful of religions
and without the raging bitter HATE atheists have.

You're a strange one, Maureen, in that most
pagans do not join atheists and work so hard
at HATING some focal point of Christianity.

Your TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking and
harassing one televangelist makes you special indeed.

[Greegor]

KBW > I'm happily married, and while the topic
KBW > has not been discussed, I don't think Lin
KBW > would take too kindly to my dating another woman.

http://cbk2.google.com/cbk?output=thumbnail&thumb=1&ll=36.322943,-94.107730&cbll=36.322971,-94.107481

[Greegor]

On Mar 28, 3:12 pm, KabukiBob <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Mar 27, 9:04 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Kent and Maureen may as well be joined at the hip.
> > > > > Several have called Maureen Kent's excrement eater.
>
> > > > I don't remember this Greegor from the old days, but I hope he doesn't
> > > > have some sort of ministry.
>
> > > > EPH 5:12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done
> > > > of them in secret.
> > > He doesn't. He's a little woman and child abusing bastard from alt
> > > child protective services
>
> > That's alt.SUPPORT.child-protective-services,
> > a SUPPORT group for families battling CPS agencies.
>

> Gee thanks for the clarification, Aspergers boy.

I pointed out your Aspergers obsessional behavior.
You think you can mirror or do the IKYABWAI
about everything. That's very Aspergers of you.

> The point still stands that you went
> there for your on personal agenda,

Most people seeking help from a family rights
SUPPORT group would be there for their own
personal agenda, Maureen.

What was YOUR agenda for being in

a SUPPORT group for families battling

CPS agencies, Maureen?

You're a bitter childless misfit who
couldn't get a date with either gender.

> not for any honest help regarding CPS.
> The "advice" you gave people there would
> have been severely detrimental to the
> parents and your Suzie Q letter
> alone shows how self-centered you are.

Maureen, Dan posted the Suzy Q court
pleading in a secured family rights group
and tried to get them to ridicule it without
my knowledge or presence. They rejected
his efforts to ridicule it and asked Dan why
he was trying to knock it.

This set the tone that eventually led to Dan
being ejected from that secure private site
for harassing another family rights person.
Dan got caught using trickery to sneak
back in and got kicked out again, with
some of this spilling over onto usenet.

Thanks for dredging up "the good old days"
as if things went the way you WISH they did.

> Lisa get her daughter back, Gaggie?
> No? Because you are there.

That's not what the paperwork says.

> > > who whined about ho baldy he was treated by
> > > CPS for abusing a seven year old girl
>
> > In a SUPPORT group for combatting CPS agencies.
>

> Which you used to try to avoid responsibility
> in hat you did to a seven year old girl.

What you claim I did is pure usenet BS.

Of course I am not responsible.

I am also not responsible for the insane
lies the caseworkers told under oath.

> > Lies, BS and wild exaggerations much like
> > alt.usenet.kooks are not what any government
> > agents should be using, especially to tear
> > families apart without any real basis.

> You did a good job in tearing a mother from her daughter, didn't you
> gaggie? And you did nothing to try to get them back together. That
> says a lot about you.

I eventually vindicated myself.

> > I vindicated myself eventually, even though
> > the Kangaroo courts they use are stacked
> > against parents and caretakers accused of
> > neglect for smoke and mirrors reasons.

> Bullshit noted. Your Suzie Q letter was hardly a "vindication" and the
> fact still remains that Lisa never got custody of her kid back--
> because of you.

She's right here next to me.

> > > for two years, then when no one
> > > there believed his " I'm a victim" con,
>
> > My assailant plead guilty.
>

> Which one? The "WITCH HUNT" or the other so-called enemies of yours
> you whined about when you pulled your " I'm a VICTIM" card?

You seem rather lost and confused.

> > > he started going after people there.

> > A bitter former caseworker from Oregon
> > who actually bragged about posting obscene
> > language for over a year, and several other
> > "system sucks" cyber squatting saboteurs
> > posing as family rights advocates.
>

> Projection noted. Irony noted.

Why would I need to "project" what an old
opponent outright bragged about publicly?

Once they could no longer hide behind
anonymity to abuse me it was no longer fun for them.

I had some amazing help to ID them, too!
( shout out thanks!)

> > The ""Child Protection"" INDUSTRY is a huge
> > governmental lobbying interest involving large
> > numbers of personnel and BILLIONS of dollars.

> Meanwhile what you DID to a seven year old
> girl for to years was hardly right, now was it gaggie?

What I actually did was terrific.
You believe your own usenet BS, Maureen!

> > They were fakes, bent on maintaining the corrupt
> > ""Child Protection"" INDUSTRY through guerilla
> > tactics online, like posing as family rights people
> > doing a sort of "spider" act to sabotage parents.

> And your "advice" to the parents would have lead to them being
> arrested. You were a great shill for CPS, gaggie.

Kent and you have pushed this pretense for YEARS.
That angle was dead before you even concocted it.
In fact, your bitterness and chafing is like a reference.

One of the old opponents was found to actually
be a bitter retired caseworker who at retirement
was taking out his frustrations for every time he
tried to abuse a client family but the court or his
superiors slapped down the rabid cuss and told
him no.

Another of the old opponents actually got kicked
out of a handful of family rights groups and openly
posted his disdain for family rights groups.

Two of the old opponents actually admitted to
being SOCIAL WORKERS. Duh?

One of the old opponents was a very active
FOSTER CONTRACTOR and worked as a trainer
for foster parents in Nebraska. Duh?

> > > That's where he met Kent and the tick has
> > > been latched onto Kent ever since.
>
> > Kent and you voluntarily entered there and
> > thought you found an easy target.

> Actually I got a taste of your crud through your asinine cross posts
> to the Bob Larson newsgroup. I didn't know the details of what kind of
> crud you are until I was already lead into this when YOU followed Kent
> into the BL newsgroup.

What you're saying is that Kent crossposted to alt.fan.bob-larson.
You ARE his stooge after all.

> > > Supposedly Hanson claims to be agnostic.
>
> > Yup.
>
> > Not religious, though respectful of religions
> > and without the raging bitter HATE atheists have.
>

> You proved the "respect" claim is a lie concerning me gaggie.

What does my disrespect for YOU have to do
with my respect for religions, Maureen?
You seem confused.

> > You're a strange one, Maureen, in that most
> > pagans do not join atheists and work so hard
> > at HATING some focal point of Christianity.

> Quit the bullshit gaggie. Every Pagan is
> an individual and none of us go lock step
> into a dogmatic we-must-be-all alike act.

But on usenet you have the raging Aspergers
atheists licking your muck boots.

> I am what I am, Deal with it.

> > Your TWENTY SEVEN YEARS stalking and
> > harassing one televangelist makes you special indeed.

Moe > Distortion, deception and lies noted.

What part of that is a distortion, deception and lie, Maureen?

Stuttering Moe calls in to BL radio show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wr1ku07Eybo

That's YOUR OWN STUTTERING VOICE, Maureen!

> Do I detect jealousy in your post gaggie?

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

> First off Larson is no "televangelist" though the old fraud is trying
> again and again to get a TV series based on him in "major network
> media".
>
> I've said this before. My interest in the fraud is because he is an
> aberrant personality

Like you?

http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/174409_1590888229_2586567_n.jpg

> that I observe his publicity and comment on same.
> I've never " stalked' nor " harassed" the old fraud, though I can't
> say the same for him.

Maureen, you've griped about his kids, his family life,
gossip about affairs, etc. You love the gossip.
You've been at it for TWENTY SEVEN YEARS!

> I'm sure Kensmithiscool, Bob Larson's alter ego on usenet, will chime
> in with his smug response, but even you have to acknowledge if I WAS
> doing what you claim he would have various legal charges on me. He
> does not, though I feel he would love to, psychopath that he is.

You're saying that lack of criminal charges against you
proves that you haven't been stalking and harassing him,
but if he DID ever file criminal charges against you it
would be because he is a psychopath?

How would filing criminal charges make somebody a psychopath?

Please explain!

> I'm the least of his problems currently. ;-)

That does not really minimize your TWENTY SEVEN YEAR
campaign of stalking and harassment.

Did you think it would?

[%]

bit r ?t ??? wrote:
> In other news from Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>:
>> KBW >
>> KBW >
>> KBW >
>>
>
> Greg Hanson's long-standing sexual obsession with Kent Wills noted.



tit tot

[bit r ⦿t ���]

My long-standing sexual obsession with Emmett Gulley's ass noted.

--
"you're a slot badger, you're a two pin din plug, a shrub rocketeer,
you're a small bean regarder, you're an unabummer, you're a bent ref,
you're the crazy world of Arthur Brown," --Brass Eye, Channel 4