Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Israel's Industrialised Death Machine At 9.7% of Hitler's Efficiency in Death Camps

12 views
Skip to first unread message

unforgiven sinner

unread,
Jan 8, 2024, 12:02:13 PMJan 8
to
I will explain this with well-known facts.

The death toll in Gaza since October 7th is 240-280 per day.

It is believed that 24,000 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli "surgical
strikes" since the beginning of onslaught.

This makes 266 each day on average. Compared to this, the Jewish
Holocaust had been estimated at 6,000,000 casualties, which is believed
to be done in 1939-1945 in six years, at rate of approximately 2,750 per day.

This shows that the Israeli death machine works at 9.7% of efficiency
of death camps of Uncle Dolph.

But, let's not jump the conclusion - give Bibi some time, he can make up
to the lag. Even the Third Reich did not aim at that rate until half-way
in 1942 when the "Endlosung" was proclaimed.

What is the lesson learned?

Gas chambers for the Palestinians would not pass today, it would
be too reminiscent of Nazis. However, confusing the civilians
to be herded like sheep in confined areas which are then bombed
with "surgical strikes" and "precision bombing" of civilians blocks in
which every blow strikes flesh and one cannot miss hitting some
unfortunate guy - but these are "collateral damage" in "surgical precision
war with Hamas".

If we add up the Islamic "collateral damage" from Gulf War One,
how much do we get? No one knows, because there are no precise
and pedantic statistics like those that Nazis kept.

But running at 10% of Hitler's efficiency during 30 years seems
acceptable to the Western media. The casualties are "towelheads",
rats and subhuman animals anyway.

Israel tries to correct her mistake by killing the eye-witnesses and
the eyes of the world - journalists, at yet unprecedented rate
which cannot be just an accident or statistical anomaly.

Hitler apparently did not make a mistake after all in the planned murder of
six million people to ensure Lebensraum - he used too high a rate
and wrong means: gas chambers which are notoriously inhumane.

If he only used surgical precision strikes with acceptable collateral damage,
and over a longer period of time - the Third Reich might have stood to this
day.

But give one credit to Netanyahu - actually achieving death rate 10%
of Hilter's makes it the number of six million over six years more credible.

in the LORD God Merciful, Longsuffering
Amen
0 new messages