In article <
dalton-8D0267....@news.eternal-september.org>,
David Dalton <
dal...@nfld.com> wrote:
> I am describing my latest attempt to magickally instigate
> a global new age on the thread "Crone Moon again" om
> alt.religion.druid, so check that thread for updates,
> which I deem more likely if you notice some effects.
>
> This time I have modified my constraining of the
> definition of goodness measure which is used in
> my workings (and was used to filter the raw version
> of those workings).
>
> Now it is constrained by
>
> Sarah McLachlan's internal definition of love
> My essential messages (which reference my internal definition of love)
> UN law
> Canadian law
> Newfoundland and Labrador law
>
> in that priority. So if something is positive or negative
> by Sarah's internal definition of love, it is positive
> or negative overall, and it doesn't get evaluated at the
> next level. Only if it is neutral or undetermined or
> not covered by Sarah's internal definition of love would
> it get passed to the next level, and so on. But I still
> think the law is needed to flesh out fine details.
That attempt didn't work. I am trying again in the
thread "casting a circle" on alt.religion.druid .
This time the constraining does not include Sarah's
internal definition of love, and is converted to
a suggestion for my eight main deities including Goddess
(the ruler of the region all/everything). Moreover,
ambiguity of collaborators will not work, and I am
working with my theory of divine collaborators including
those eight main deities, but even if it works I guess
others may have other theories.
"I dreamed of a circle; I dreamed of a circle round; and in that circle I
had made were all the worlds unformed and unborn yet" (Natalie Merchant)