Dalai Lama and others trying to identify me

[David Dalton]

The Dalai Lama and others are currently trying to identify
the global primary ootw (which I used to call avatar type),
which is me. This they could easily do by googling
“blue rose vision” (including the quotation marks).
However I think they expect me to have a lot of
followers at this stage. But in my case I have and
want no blind followers, though I do want people
to read my essential messages. Also about 379,000
people globally have received at least 100 words from
me in my lifetime. And about 400 million people have
received at least 100 words from my main inspirer of
my species, mi-ootw (which I used to call devi type)
Sarah McLachlan, and I have a faint hope that she might
reveal me, even if we never become romantically involved.

--
David Dalton dal...@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
"And if I shed a tear I won’t cage it; I won't fear love;
And if I feel a rage I won’t deny it; I won't fear love" (Sarah McLachlan)

[David Dalton]

On Jan 5, 2024, David Dalton wrote on alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
(in article<0001HW.2B48B1A400...@news.eternal-september.org>):

> On Jan 5, 2024, Noah Sombrero wrote on alt.buddha.short.fat.guy
> (in article<msbgpi542dsjlfrv4...@4ax.com>):

>
> > On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 01:34:20 -0330, David Dalton<dal...@nfld.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > The Dalai Lama and others are currently trying to identify
> > > the global primary ootw (which I used to call avatar type),
> > > which is me. This they could easily do by googling
> > > “blue rose vision” (including the quotation marks).
> > > However I think they expect me to have a lot of
> > > followers at this stage. But in my case I have and
> > > want no blind followers, though I do want people
> > > to read my essential messages. Also about 379,000
> > > people globally have received at least 100 words from
> > > me in my lifetime. And about 400 million people have
> > > received at least 100 words from my main inspirer of
> > > my species, mi-ootw (which I used to call devi type)
> > > Sarah McLachlan, and I have a faint hope that she might
> > > reveal me, even if we never become romantically involved.
> >

> > It is my understanding that buddhists don't believe in god. So how
> > could they believe in an avatar, since that is an incarnation of god
> > in this world?
>
> I said avatar type, not avatar. I don’t believe that those who
> have been called avatars actually were.

So I guess I retract my claim to being the latest incarnation of Kamadeva.

See the Glossary on my mystic page for my definition of ootw.

OK, I will repeat it here:

ootw=Opener of the Way, and for ghumans an ootw is one who has undergone a
sun stare, thorn hill climb, and blue rose vision, while for cetaceans it is
probably still a sun stare and analogies to the thorn hill climb and blue
rose vision. I previously called an ootw an avatar type. An ootw is capable
of soul-aligning with any other someone given permission of the other
someone, which I relate to stories of Krishna making himself big or small. I
also call an ootw a primary ootw.

I also used to call an avatar type one similar to some who have been
called avatars, as well as many who have not (e.g. Moses and Jacob).