Ram's Incest with His Sister Sita
naz...@my-deja.com
by Babu Jambulingam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Ever since the First Aryan invasion under Indra, waves of Aryans have
descended upon India with greedy eyes, exterminating the Indigenous
Sudroid Negroes and pushing them into the jungles. After Indra came the
Second Aryan Invasion under the tyrannical Bharata (1400 BC), the Third
Aryan invasion under Krishna the Killer (1200 BC), the Mahabharatan
Aryan invasion (900 BC), the Fifth Aryan invasion under the intolerant
Ikshvaku (800 BC) and then the 6th Aryan invasion under the monster
Rama of Ayodhya (800 BC). This fanatic Ram was deified by the Aryans on
account of the number of Sudra Blacks he killed. Besides massacering
Sudras, this Aryan hero committed incest by marrying his sister when
she was 6 years old. Naturally, this episode has been suppressed by the
Vaishnavite fanatics, and all passages containing this embarassing
passage have been carefully deleted.
Sita - Rama's Own Sister
Firstly, let us answer the question, `In what relation does Sita stand
to Rama ?' We find the oldest extant Ramayanas unambiguously stating
that Sita was Rama's sister. The most damning evidence comes from the
Buddhist Dasaratha Jataka which pre-dates any other extant Ramayana,
all other Ramayanas having been destroyed by Vaishnavas bent upon white-
washing Rama. Hence, the only original Ramayanas survive in the
Buddhist canon in Sri Lanka and the Far East where they could not fall
into the hands of Vishnuite bigots. These Buddhist texts clearly states
that Sita was Rama's sister -
" In the Dasarathajataka Sita is represented as the sister as well as
the wife of Rama, son of Dasaratha of the Ikshvaku line."
[ Chandra, p.156 ]
Chandra, due to his pro-Hindu bias, then ascribes this passage as being
a Buddhist invention. Although it is true that Buddhists have published
some of the virulent anti-Vedic tracts, the Buddhists are in this case
merely the preservers of a tradition which was later on obliterated by
Vaishnavas. The reason is that the institution of sister-brother
marriage was common in the Ikshvaku tribe of Aryans, being widely
illustrated in literature -
" In the Anabattha Sutta and the Mahavastu Avadana we are told that the
Ikshvaku princes, who were banished by their father and took shelter on
the slopes of the Himalayas, and from whom the Sakyas traced their
descent, married their own sisters in order to maintain the purity of
their line."
-- [ Chandra, p.155 ]
Hence, the custom of brother-sister incest was institutionalised
amongst the Ikshvaku dynasty, and it is only natural for Rama, a member
of this dynasty, to have married his own sister Sita. Indeed, faced
with this evidence, the situation is now reversed : Since the dynastic
lineage of Rama rigidly practiced brother-sister marriage, how is it
possible for the traditionalist Rama not to have married his own
sister ? Incest is indeed widely mentioned in the Ramayana { Aranya
Kandam, Chapter 45, Verses 122, 123, 124 and 125 } and was an
acceptable practice amongst the uncivilized nomadic Aryan tribes. One
need only recall the cases of Brahma and his daughter Sarasvati [ Rig
Veda III.31.1-2 ], the Vedic Pushan and his sister [ Rg Ved VI.55.4 ],
Rigvedic Agni who is the lover of his sister [ Rg Ved X.3.3 ], and
Krishna who shared his sister with his brother Balarama as depicted in
the Mahabharata [ MBh.Wh. , p.153 ].
Rama Raped 6 Year Old Girls
Let us now see how old Sita was when Rama married her. Even the
standard versions of the Ramayana, namely those that have not been
cleansed of the incriminating passages, state that Rama was 16 years
old when she married Sita, and Sita was only a tender 14 years old [
Ram.wh 69 ]. However, this age is once again a later interpolation;
earlier Ramayanas state that both Sita and Rama were 6 years old when
they married -
" The life history of Rama begins with the killing of "Thadaka" by Rama
as a boy of 5 hiding himself some where and his marriage at the age of
six. "
-- [ Valmiki ]
Another interesting point often suppressed by Vaishnava bigots is
Sita's incestous relation with Laxman, Rama's half-brother (half-
brother since they were sired by different disciples of the Brahmin
officiating at King Dasaratha's Ashwamedha). Thus a Sudra Black called
Viradha, probably a Gond Adivasi, witnessed Sita's crimes and charged
her with polyandry, desiring to marry her [ Ram.wh, p. 341-3 ]. In
response, Ram and Lakshman killed this `Rakshasa', `hideous to the
sight' `mouth widely gaping', `tall as a mountain top', with a `deep
voice'; these are all physical descriptions that fir the Sudroid
Negroes of Central India. The manner in which he was killed exemplifies
Aryan cruelty, being in accordance with the apartheid laws of the
Vedas. Laxman broke his arms after firing 7 arrows at him and then
burnt him alive. His semi-live body was then buried into the ground.
All this because he spoke out the truth, namely that Laxman shared Sita
with Rama.
Another embarassing question for Vaishnavas, is whether Sita eloped
with the Negro king Ravana or was taken captive by him. All evidence
indicates that she willingly eloped. There are several reasons for
this. Firstly, she was later caste out by Rama, and she ultimately gave
birth to her sons in a remote forest. Secondly, the manner in which
Sita abused Rama indicates that she was not too happy with him. Thus,
the Ramayana states that Sita abused Ram as follows: "you are no better
than a womanmonger who lets his wife for hire and makes his
livelihood"; "You want to be profited by my prostitution"; "you lack
potence and charm" [ Aranya Kandam.Ch.54 ]. Sitas love and passion for
days spent with Ravan have been documented in Bengali Ramayan, [
Bengali Ramayana, Calcutta, pages 199 and 200 ]. Rama's description of
Sita's beauty is lewdly detailed [ C.R. Srinivasa lyengar's translation
of Aryana Kandam, Chapter 46 ] In Kiskind Kandam, Rama explains to
Lakshmana of his sexual experience with Sita.
These items were deleted by the Vaishnava Brahmans in yet another
attempt to perpetrate historical fraud. However, the truth has finally
been dug out since the Buddhist Ramayana is older than the extant
Vaishnava versions, and preserve the facts which were later suppressed
by the Aryan Vaishnava fundamentalists. Rama's dirty laundry has been
exposed for all to see. So Rama was, besides being guilty of the mass
murder of Sudra Blacks, introducing apartheid and supporting fascism,
guilty of incest and child-marriage.
Let us not forget how Rama usurped the throne -
" When Rama was aged 18, his father Dasaratha conspired together with
Rama for the purpose of celebrating the coronation ceremony of Rama as
king of Ayothya, even though they knew well, that the kingdom of
Ayothya belonged only to Kaikeyi and her son Baratha who was the heir-
apparent according to the promise, already made by Dasaratha to
Kaikeyi. "
-- [ Valmiki ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
References
[ Das.Jat ] = `Dasarathajataka'
[ Chandra ] = `The Indo-Aryan Races' , Ramaprasad Chandra, Indological
Book Corp. 1976 New Delhi.
[ MBh.wh ] = `India of the Vedic Age with reference to the
Mahabharata', J.Talboys Wheeler, reprint 1973, Cosmo Publications,
Delhi
[ Ram.wh ] = `India of the Brahmanic Age with reference to the
Ramayana', J. Talboys Wheeler, Cosmos Publaications, Delhi 1973
[ Valmiki ] = `Ramayana as depicted by Valmiki', Tanthai Periyar,
Modern Rationalist, Vol. 24, No. 5 ( May 1999 )
http://periyar.org/mr/9905mr5.htm
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.