On Monday, 8 September 2014 14:08:37 UTC+10, Peetee Aitchei wrote:
Confidential: Attomey-Client Privilege
KLEMP/ECKANKAR DAMAGES TO SRI DARWIN GROSS
"What is the commercial interest of a religion?
"It's obvious that it's involved soliciting donations, and that depends on the credibility of the
religion and the religious leaders. This 15-page letter was an attack on Eckankar. It certainly was
an attack piece, and that would have had a commercial impact on Eckankar."
This statement serves as a definition of damages proposed by the ECKANKAR corporation itself,
a standard to which it may reasonably be held in assessing it's damaging conduct. The statement,
coming from ECKANKAR's own legal counsel, amounts to an admission of the damage done to
the livelihood of Sri Darwin Gross by massive ECKANKAR attacks , commencing August 8, 1983,
formally propounded to the leadership ranks on October 22, 1983, and continuing to the present
day. When analyzed in terms of the October 14, 1989 letter of Darwin Gross and its contents, the
evidence of damage intentionally inflicted upon the person, reputation and career of Darwin is
overwhelming. ECKANKAR had no refutation of any of the meticulously detailed charges leveled
against it in Darwin's 10-14-89 letter.
The 10-14-89 charges were grounded in fact and offered in self defense. Sans justification, the
corporation cynically sued to silence Darwin on frivolous grounds, alleging critical quotations from
Paul Twitchell to be "publication" of unpublished proprietary materials rather than the fair
comment obviously intended; that Darwin's critical use of trademarked terms somehow
constituted a violation thereof. The 10-14-89 letter actually documents a wide range of extremely
damaging conduct against Darwin Gross by premeditated acts of extreme malice on the part of
Harold Klemp and the ECKANKAR corporation.
1. Harold deliberately deceived Darwin from inception, concealing his mental condition and
history. Klemp only recently recounted his attempted suicide, grandiosity, public nudity and arrest
in Child in the Wildemess. Had Darwin known of this he would not have nominated him for the
stressful position he did. Mastership is not a task for those subject to mental breakdown. Instead
Darwin would have recommended that Harold seek professional help. One needs a firm
foundation in reality before undertaking the stress of spiritual unfoldment, to say nothing of
mastership. Both Paul and Darwin have said this on many occasions. That Harold concealed his
disturbed mental state from Darwin is another evidence of that condition. There is nothing
remotely spiritual about attempted suicide, belief one controls
the weather, disrobing in a public place or being taken into police custody. That Harold now
boasts of this in a published book suggests his grasp of reality remains inadequate. The
deception damaged Darwin by exposing him to ridicule and contempt.
2. Harold deliberately deceived Darwin into investing him with an extremely close and
sacred trust. Nominated by Darwin as his successor-in-training, Klemp conspired against
Darwin, launching a premeditated, all-out sneak attack on his unsuspecting benefactors. Klemp
already had Darwin's total support. Darwin had already taken the initiative, announcing his desire
to retire. Klemp elected to steal what he should have earned, destroying Darwin in the process.
Klemp had every reason to know well in advance that his plans to betray the teachings and
writings of Sri Paul Twitchell would be opposed by their guardian, Darwin Gross. Klemp's
unprincipled strategy was to so completely destroy the reputation of Darwin that the latter's
opposition would count for little or nothing when the time came.
1. Michael J. Esler Esq. on behalf of ECKANKAR, before the United States District Court for
the District of Oregon, ECKANKAR vs. Darwin Gross, Civil No. 89-1150-JU, May 7, 1990,
Portland, Transcript of Proceedings, Motion for Summary Judgement, p. 7, lines 7-12.
2. Harold wrote what turned out to be a true confession: "So many of our mental hospitals
are filled with persons who have dabbled in psychic phenomenon they are pushed over the
borderline from normalcy to emotional disorder. Unless the symptoms are recognized he may
seriously damage the lives of those around him. To satisfy his desires he will step on anyone
regardless of injury to feelings or the reputation of an innocent person. He is a pathological liar
but talks so convincingly that he is believed and is able to get ahead. But eventually his words
and actions boomerang and cost him dearly. Of all the mental ailments this is one of the most
difficult to resolve, according to medical authorities. It is probably the most damaging and
misunderstood of all."
Confidential: Attomey-Client Privilege -2- 12/24/98
3. Harold Klemp deliberately involved his wife in the deception, conniving a show of marital
solidarity to influence Darwin Gross. The marital solidarity was as contrived as Klemp's pseudoloyalty
to Darwin and the teachings. After seizing the corporate object of his ambition, Klemp
unceremoniously dumped not only Darwin but the mother of his daughter in favor of a younger
woman. 3 The latter was the culmination of a sordid office affair conducted under the very noses
of his wife and daughter.4 If one is to judge Klemp by his own actions, treachery is a way of life
with him. The marital solidarity deception induced Darwin to rely upon Harold, to the former's
considerable loss.
4. To consolidate his takeover and to destroy Darwin's reputation as an otherwise qualified
witness against him, Klemp spread outrageous lies, foremost among which was an allegation that
Darwin "stole" $2,600,000 from the corporations This he was so negative and outrageous that the
majority of members could not bring themselves to reject it. They believed it must be true, that no
one would otherwise stoop so low. Klemp counted on the incredulity of the average man in a
textbook exercise of the technique made infamous in this century by Dr. Joseph Goebels, and
along lines openly declared in the most infamous of all 20th century documents, Mein KaMpf 6
3 Klemp's callous throwing over of his wife contrasts the sensitive parting of Darwin and Gail. The
demands of the membership made it impossible for Darwin to devote to her the time and energy
she needed after a long and bruising battle helping Paul bring the ancient message to the modem
world. Gail needed the rest and privacy Darwin's position made it impossible to have. He has
always presented Gail in a most favorable licht. He has never cast any reflection upon her. They
conducted an amicable parting in the spirit of mature friendship and a shared trust. It was a
parting of the ways noteworthy for its cordiality and good will.
4 Harold insisted upon keeping his office at home after nominated him in 1981. Darwin was
temporarily working in the office at the request of the Board of Trustees, trying to improve
operations, and became
aware that Joan Cross would run errands to Klemp's home lasting for hours rather that the
minutes required. Darwin could not help but know of this because when he needed the office
station wagon he would
be told Joan had taken it to Harold's office. Darwin was saddened by this but said nothing,
knowing it must all come out in time.
5 The accusative terirn "stole" was actually written into court papers filed by the same Michael
Esler in 1983, in support of Klemp's spurious suit to recover the normal equipment, manuscripts
and bank
accounts duly authorized by Klemp as a voting trustee for Darwin's Oregon semi-retirement
operation. They should have been recovered in the same manner, by vote of the Trustees.
Darwin never disobeyed an
instruction of the Board of Trustees. Klemp has sealed off the corporation's records from public
view but cannot deny he was in attendance at the Board meetina in which the Trustees
unanimously authorized
Darwin's move to Oregon. That same Board authorized a retirement home for Darwin's comfort at
Salishan on the Oregon coast. A trustee architect desioned the home, including meeting space
for future trustee
meetino,s. The same Board authorized the transfer of trust funds to Oregon, the income from
which was to cover the overhead entailed by Darwin's office. Darwin never signed a check alone
in his entire career
at ECKANKAR. Exhaustive audit by Klemp failed to turn up a sinale instance of financial
irresponsibility on Darwin's part despite his intense involvement in a dozen years of spectacular,
often hectic
organizational growth. Klemp knew when he made his false charges against Darwin at a Higher
Initiates meeting he called for October 22, 1983, that his audience would have no way of knowing
at the time that
he, Harold Klemp, had actually voted to authorize the very conduct he now characterized as
irresponsible and criminal!