Defamers, Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks

[Henosis Sage]

"Besmirch may sound kind of funny, but it goes hand in hand with other hurtful words like defame and slander. It can also mean to literally stain something. So that time you tracked mud all over the new white carpet and then blamed it on your little brother? That was a double besmirching -- dirtying the rug and then falsely accusing a sibling." - vocabulary.com

Ratfink - "the combination of two terms used to describe the underhandedness of someone to stress what a low down sneak they are." - urbandictionary.com

Clown - "to laugh, make fun of, or find joy in a person or event. Almost always used in a derogatory or degrading fashion." - urbandictionary.com

Defamer - "To ruin the reputation of; libel (written) or slander (verbal).
All bullies do is defame people and make them feel inferior." - urbandictionary.com

So, if we combine those we get a besmiratfinkdefamerclo? I was recently a target of a besmiratfinkdefamerclo at work. It was a bad experience that pushed up a volcano of angry emotional responses, some of which I didn't even know I had. When all was said and done it, inspired me to think about what makes these people tick and pen an opine.

First a brief digression ...

There was a little known historical besmiratfinkdefamerclown who was quite adept at his scandalous craft back in the early 1800s. I say little known since he was one of those relatives hanging from a limb of one of the more obscure branches of my family tree and only infamous in the space of time he occupied as a human being. I surely hope I am not a reincarnate of this guy ... ghastly karma there I imagine. For the purposes of this article I'll just call him Thorndike.

Obviously Thorndike had his issues as generally does anyone who functions as a besmiratfinkdefamerclown. What exactly he really wanted out of life or other people is still unclear ... even a few of his attempts at relentlessly badgering people for money to get him to shut up and go away never really amounted to much. He connived and finagled with such devious skill that it is still hard to believe that he was incapable of becoming a millionaire. Eventually he got himself strung up and hung down from the local gallows tree.

Sometimes the fox in the hen house gets pecked ...

OOPS

Thorndike's tools were as nasty as he was apparently according to family oral history stories . He was a master wordsmith and pro at wielding shock, embarrassment and the shame-shame finger at innocent targets simply because he felt like it for whatever affront he imagined at the time complete with the assessment that they deserved it. It was rarely even a counter-attack for unkind words or simple human misunderstanding. Thorndike was the punisher, deliverer and the annihilator sent from one high - the holy of holies! Puffed up chest and puffed up ego, Thorndike was simply the worst kind of self righteous b*stard.

His words were crafted so well that they had a life of their own and hung in the atmosphere like a putrid green fog long after he uttered them. In a time of propriety such as when he lived people feared scandal. He was alleged to have incapacitated quite a few and was known to be proud of it since he stood lofty in self righteous indignation; behind him a wall of "proofs." Unfortunate that wall of proof only took one hammer truth revealing incident to be easily crumbled.

As the oral history goes, his big mistake was zeroing in on a young lady whose grandfather (unknown to Thorndike) was a former judge with political clout and friends in high places. There is a long held assumption that Thorndike had a passion for the young lady and was extremely envious of her fiancé who was a popular young man rising high on the local political ladder. Good stock and all that. Success and all that. Thorndike simply would not have it. So what was the dirt du juor he might dig up? Surely there must be some misdemeanor he could use to bring down and crash Camelot. So, the accusations and reputation slaying began. It was when the momentum was at its peak and Thorny felt he was on the eve of his victory that a miscalculation brought the whole thing crashing down around his clown clodhopper feet. In his ego fog he overlooked getting one tiny piece of info, that one nail of truth, and he ended up being charged with a serious crime (the particulars of which were somehow lost in the family history) and sent to the gallows. Some say he was set up. Some say it was political revenge. Yeah, and karma is a b*tch.

In the end Thorndike got his ... but what about the besmiratfinkdefamerclos of today? How about that besmiratfinkdefamerclo in my office who was pumping out assumptions with vindictive aplomb?

Psychologists say that this form of harassment obviously is manipulation with a need for power at its base. Seems to me it's rare that there is a person out there who is not guilty of drawing conclusions about the lives of others without actually seeking the truth to fill in the gaps. For some, these gaps often become stuffed with faulty self righteous truths and clownish fillers that may appear real to the less evolved. There is an instant inclination to surmise, speculate and size up the information or evidence however it often goes beyond plain old gossip and can get ugly. Very ugly and rarely turns out the way the besmiratfinkdefamerclo desires.

After sorting my scenario out and reviewing Thorndike's end of life circumstance as the worst case scenario I have come to the following conclusions:

In the face of tragic or scandalous circumstances, what other people think is largely irrelevant.

What other people think is what other people think.

And sometimes things are not how they look.

The real truth is behind what is present despite how it may look. Too bad besmiratfinkdefamerclos never bother to do the work and look and get all the facts before letting a prideful quest get diarrheic. Too bad Thorndike and the guy in my office didn't look before they pointed the boney besmirching finger of clown judgment for the last time.

But people just do not listen .. do not get their facts right .. and believe they are above the LAW and everyone else in this world.

(shrug)

Eventually THE Universe will teach them better ... no point getting upset about anything. Act accordingly to the situation ... and if that means Law Enforcement, or Lawyers, then so be it.

[Henosis Sage]

Place a land mine in the ground and chances are someone will step on it, sooner or later.

aka putting cheese or peanut butter on a rat trap ... LMAO~~~!!!

But I do things in my own time ... so will leave this one sit for a few days, a week or months, or maybe might just ignore it .. and see if people can work it out all by themselves and their soul travel skills and the superior advice of the eck masters wiht having to be told the BLEEDING OBVIOUS .... :-)

<smiling>

[Henosis Sage]

On Thursday, 25 June 2015 15:52:16 UTC+10, Henosis Sage wrote:
> Place a land mine in the ground and chances are someone will step on it, sooner or later.
>
> aka putting cheese or peanut butter on a rat trap ... LMAO~~~!!!
>
> But I do things in my own time ... so will leave this one sit for a few days, a week or months, or maybe might just ignore it .. and see if people can work it out all by themselves and their soul travel skills and the superior advice of the eck masters wiht having to be told the BLEEDING OBVIOUS .... :-)
>
> <smiling>
>
>

Defamers, Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks Tsk tsk tsk ... I am being DEFAMED YET AGAIN - THIS WILL NOT STAND - now falsely accused of being a "thief" and a "plagiarist" - some people never learn. I have been falsely accused of 'stealing' - but what have I stolen? Nothing!

Neither is there any Proof~!!!

Who has been deprived of their possessions or money here? No one. How could I have "stolen" anything then? I have not.

Contrary to some claims made around the world, my post "Defamers, Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks" was very much for educational purposes and was fair in love and war.

Didn't some one else just post an actual "Original copy" of this totally different comment - besmirchers-clowns-and-ratfinks -- IN FULL ?????

the one by "" - *.* (c) 2015 J.H. Corellli
This article may not be reprinted in full or part without permission. Fair use does not apply.
- See more at: http://www.lightforcenetwork.com/holmes/besmirchers-clowns-and-ratfinks"

Sheesh I can't see any written permission slip by Mr Corelli anywhere that allows someone to republish his different article. Can you? Then that isnt plagiarism that's copyright infringment, isn't it? :)

Now as I so wisely culled form the astral library via Z and Gopal das, because sometimes things are not how they look. WE SHOULD BE MORE CAREFUL.

The real truth is behind what is present despite how it may look. Too bad besmiratfinkdefamerclos never bother to do the work and look and get all the facts before letting a prideful quest get diarrheic.

Too bad Thorndike and the guy in my office didn't look before they pointed the boney besmirching finger of clown judgment for the last time.

But people just do not listen .. do not get their facts right .. and believe they are above the LAW and everyone else in this world. (shrug)

Eventually THE Universe will teach them better ... no point getting upset about anything. Act accordingly to the situation ... and if that means Law Enforcement, or Lawyers, then so be it.

And of course let's review the fantasyland philosophy on plagiarism by an idiot.

FIRST, no one cares. I asked them and they all said, nope not interested about this. It means nothing. It amounts to nothing. It is nothing. That is what everyone already thinks about this foolishly false claim against me here.

The gutter snipes will do and say anything these days. No respect for decent writers these days.

Can Mr Corellli (with 3 Ls) provide was someone called Copyright Registration evidence? Appartently neither can The Light Force Network show a valid "registration" for the Copyright © 2015 Created by The Omnipresent. This must mean something to an idiot, surely?

Stunningly some crying foul with accusations of plagiarism, when yesterday, there's nothing wrong with it and proves nothing but plagiarism. But does it really?

In Idiocracy land .. in order for plagiarsim to valid there needs to me more than 3 words in a row the same. No where does this happen if one looks at these two texts. Unless one understands that I wrote mine first.

What I posted here has a completely different import and message and intent to the other. so can't be the same thing or mean the same thing. So it can't be plagiarism.

And I can't possibly be a liar, a thief or have stolen anything, or breached any copyright laws here, because if you look at the TOTAL BODY of MY WORKS you will find over 10,000 posts some are thousands of words long ... so when you see this one comment here about "Defamers, Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks" EVERYBODY CAN SEE that that would NOT even amount to 0.000007 % of my total writing output .. so no way can I be truthfully accused of being a low life plagiarist or a thief.

That's much more to the pattern of the entrenched behaviour over the last 3 or so years at the LFN, but of Matt Sharpe in particular has been prolific in copyright infringing behaviours .... republishing all kinds of materials covered by other people's Copyrights without any permission.

Looks like an established HABIT to me ... and then he denies it publicly - what an idiot thing to do.

I don't know how Homles or Mr Corelli got their hands on my original piece and they stole it and posted it to LFN website .. well I never ... the hide of them.

I was taken to the top level Astral Library, by Z, where all the spools and things are, twitchell was there doing some research ... while Gopal das and a few of the library assistants, the MAIN library not the scruffy back water ones, they rolled out this huge script and there was written in pixie dust was what I posted originally above .. more less as is .. I had to go back 4 times to get different parts, hand write it out, then type it up .. and edit for posting to a.r.e. .... Gopal Das said that I needed to put it out for the WHOLE WORLD about Defamers, Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks, so who was I to say no?

Let's face it, there just isn't any evidence that I plagiarized or infringed anyone's copyright. None. No proof at all. I have an IQ over 145. I have a photographic memory. I have read 2867 different books on 'soul travel', I cna do "remote viewing" eg to go to astral library and transcribe stuff written there, as well and reach into peoples past lives (oh only wit their inner permission of course) and I can tell the future.

But more than that, when I stand in the sunlight I do not cast any shadow!! Far out, seriously I don't .... and barely look a moment over 36 years old :-)

Then there is always docs like this: that helps to bring hyperbolic bullshit back down to earth, and rational, with a PROPER PERSPECTIVE .. for those who care about Truth and Fair Use.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/232760196/Dialogues-with-the-Master-Plagiarism-by-Paul-Twitchell

That can sometimes help to bring the fantastical hyperbolic bullshit back down to earth, and get real and rational, with a PROPER PERSPECTIVE .. for those who care about Truth and Fair Use at least.

Idiots and dick heads tend to do other things. (shrug)

SOME PEOPLE NEED TO GET A RIGHT IDEA ABOUT WHAT AN ORIGINAL IS & WHICH ONE ISN'T

LMAO~~~!!!

[Henosis Sage]

2000 a.r.e.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/ebKpxE5b4bI/Jm5tPmh3y2EJ

[Etznab]

On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 8:39:09 PM UTC-5, Kinpa wrote:
> On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 12:33:29 AM UTC, Henosis Sage wrote:
> > On Thursday, 25 June 2015 13:10:36 UTC+10, Kinpa wrote:
> >
> > GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY SPACE NOW
> >
> > "In Eckankar we refer to this as the Law of Non-Interference,
> > which states " Anyone who uses any means of change or
> > influence on another's mind, including prayer, is violating a
> > LAW of spiritual consciousness." *
> >
> > "A person's space is no different than a home owned by one,
> > no one can enter it unless first invited or allowed by the owner,
> > and any who enter under any other circumstance, is a CRIMINAL."
> >
> > Copied, plagiarised, written by KINPA aka Matt Sharpe
> > aka A Compulsive Lying Manipulator & Abuser & a
> > Delusional Psychotic Dishonest Nutcase and Idiot!!!
> >
> > 3. Psychic Space and the Law of Non-Interference (c) 2014 - Matt Sharpe
> > (via the Light Force Network ...)
> >
> > One thing that can often make for problematic situations amongst groups of people is the idea of, or lack of, recognized psychic space by which is meant the emotional and varying mental aspects of space, both on the inner planes and relating states of consciousness, as well as the inner states of every human being in the Physical Realm. The boundaries of these are often not recognized or shared between any group in particular, and that only becomes harder between different groups of people, one often refusing to respect the space and freedom of choice, as well as the basic right to make a choice of any other. In Eckankar we refer to this as the Law of Non-Interference, which states " Anyone who uses any means of change or influence on another's mind, including prayer, is violating a law of spiritual consciousness." *
> >
> > A person's space is no different than a home owned by one, no one can enter it unless first invited or allowed by the owner, and any who enter under any other circumstance, is a criminal. And this works to the same extent in reverse. It can be said that a person's space extends right out to the point where another's begins. Any individual who is minding their own business, and is not stepping out into another's, may do as they see fit, so long as it harms no other. A situation where a person wants another to do a thing that they have said no to, who then proceeds to attempt to talk the person into doing that thing, is quite literally attempting mind control. There are no exceptions within that framework. Not many would recognize such a simple, everyday situation such as that as being an attempt at mind control until it is done to themselves, where it suddenly becomes far more obvious.
> >
> > One who has perceptive "gifts", that can perceive more deeply than the average person must also be very careful not to invade another's space without first gaining permission. While they might well have a flow of information incoming that can be turned off, also if one hasn't yet learned how to do that, the very least they can do is be respectful and remain silent. Not everything that comes in necessarily needs to be said aloud. This is often a matter of self-control, and if one says something that causes a disturbance, they may find themselves rightfully to blame for that.
> >
> > In any such case where one's psychic space has been invaded, there will always be a karmic debt incurred. This is simply another way of saying that that individual that used the invasive behavior has chosen to learn the principles of the lesson in a harder way, one that is generally referred to as "bad" karma. When this happens, the individual themselves have made and are responsible for, the choice that brought the karma into being. Because of this, they and they alone can re-balance the scales, and in every case, the way this occurs is by completing the cycle of karma and learning the lesson, also putting into being a more evolved choice which proves the lesson has indeed been learned. Thenceforth the individual can recognize the same circumstances in a great many situations and have better options to deal with them and by doing that, avoid a cycle of repeating the same mistakes.
> >
> > Where the psychic space of others and the Law of Non-Interference are concerned, the Golden Rule definitely applies: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." And after applying the Law of Karma to it, one might add to the quote: "Because they WILL!" Those that consistently indulge themselves in following a double standard will undoubtedly find that karmic law is very detailed and accurate. It cannot be dodged or outrun, and it never falls victim to trickery and cannot be deceived.
> >
> > A thing as simple as talking someone into something, is nothing less than an attempt at mind control as well as an invasion of another's space that might not seem so obvious at first glance. The fact that a person needs to be talked into a thing denotes that they are not willing to engage in it to begin with, and thus, an attempt to change that person's decision is invasive. Many have no idea of this fact. It is no different when a child seeks to talk a parent into giving them a liberty they might otherwise not have available to them, however, in such a case generally no grudge is held and rightly so, however, after a certain age, such things will most often no longer be tolerated. It lasts as long as does that child's cuteness, and is outgrown quickly.
> >
> > One aspect of "space" in general that isn't often considered at all is whether or not a person is extending their own space outward to include things they would rather not include or be affected by. Often this can be causing a reaction unconsciously for one. A thing one had never thought of as having any effect on them can be having an unknown effect that isn't so easily recognized by all. It pays to become aware of all of the things one's attention is extended to include. Some of the time problems can actually be drawn towards ourselves by ourselves acting in an unconscious way. What I mean is that we don't always realize the true effect a thing might have upon us, so that we continue onward never realizing that a thing we have extended our attention in some way out to include might have a negative effect upon us, and the only way to remove that is to become aware of it, and removing our attention and thus our state of consciousness away from it, and in this way becoming better aware of the true effect a thing can have in this way, so that we can look out for this happening again. For example, one might think something not so nice or considerate about a friend, based on a prejudicial attitude one some aspect of that person's life, one which is completely within their rights to have. By not having been aware of in the first place, our mistake in judgment, and in the second place, the effect of said judgment, we can bring negativity into our purview that we would rather not have to deal with.
> >
> > In this case a more honest and complete view of the self is needed, as well as the development of a less judgmental view of others and the choices some might make. Nothing less than adapting in this way will begin chipping away at the formation of a less than advantageous point of view of others. It is generally not a terrible way of looking at a situation, by placing ourselves in that other's position so as to gain a notion of what it would be like were positions reversed. This can go far for developing degrees of consideration that may not have been so easily come by before then.
> >
> > The idea of psychic space is on one hand a very familiar concept to some, but on the other hand, almost unheard or thought of by many others, and because of this the rules regarding it are often unclear to many. Healing of any sort is a thing that falls very much within the area of an individual's space, and stands at risk to be possibly invaded by those unaware of the limits of their own free will, which are of course up to the point at which another's space begins. Any average doctor would never begin medical treatment until any potential patient came to them willingly, seeking medical help. This obvious situation is many times much less obvious in the area of psychic or spiritual healers, and most often this is the specific area where invasions occur.
> >
> > This area shares a considerable amount with various religious groups that proselytize. If one hasn't actually asked or expressed interest in the "help" it simply cannot be given to a person, especially under the guise of doing a thing deemed (by another) to be for their own best interests. A happy Muslim isn't likely to enjoy having Jehova's Witnesses coming to their door weekly attempting to "save" them by convincing them to change their religion. In the very same way any healer will find it not only impossible to heal a person that hasn't yet asked to be healed, but also that if they go forward uninvited with such an action, there will be a heavy karmic burden to bear. These things, regardless of motivation, break spiritual law and bear a karmic price.
> >
> > And on the positive side of this, if a person is unwell and asks for a healing, or for further infprmation on a different spiritual path than the one they had been on, an interested person can certainly offer aid and information that they might have the capacity to perform. And the very same standard applies to inner spiritual teachings, one who considers themselves, or is considered by others to be a teacher, and who actually has the ability to channel spiritual teachings and experience to a student, cannot ever do so without first asking permission, or being invited to do so, this is a part of the Law of Non-Interference, the same law governs all three of those various but similar circumstances.
> >
> > [ end quote ]
>
> Nice but irrelevant attempt at changing the subject, which was YOUR blatant plagiarizing and lying...still haven't come up with the source for what you CLAIM was plagiarized by me on this OLD and inaccurate DRAFT of a chapter of my book? You'll need to do better than that, you being a PROVEN liar...

Chapter of your book.

Now I see what Sean was referring to.

Thanks.

[Etznab]

On Thursday, June 25, 2015 at 8:33:40 PM UTC-5, Kinpa wrote:
> On Friday, June 26, 2015 at 12:35:19 AM UTC, Henosis Sage wrote:

> I have never been in YOUR space...that must be your guilty conscience talking to you...

Are you an only child?

[Henosis Sage]

On Friday, 26 June 2015 12:00:13 UTC+10, Etznab wrote:

>
> Chapter of your book.
>
> Now I see what Sean was referring to.
>
> Thanks.

Now you got it ... you'll find it here:

Access denied
You are not authorized to access this page.
http://www.lightforcenetwork.com/users/shabda-preceptor

https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/NFDswLOau-w/ITHdOxF9bhcJ

http://alt.religion.eckankar.narkive.com/PPweUfVf/blog-posts-by-shabda-preceptor

(smile)

That and more all on my hard drive :-)

EXAMPLE PAGE SNAPSHOT HERE -

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-M0yAR0UPhPRmExU2tmX3pIVDQ/view?usp=sharing

(shrug)

and another

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-M0yAR0UPhPaE5KMXlyYlA5Zlk/view?usp=sharing

and another

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-M0yAR0UPhPQmN4M2tNYVRSVmc/view?usp=sharing



=====

eg

Illuminated Way Letters - May-1966
googleplus
SHABDA - Preceptor's picture Submitted by SHABDA - Preceptor on Thu, 2012-10-25 02:56

- See more at: file:///C:/Users/Sean/Downloads/LFN%20PAGES/Illuminated%20Way%20Letters%20-
%20May-1966%20_%20Light%20Force%20Network.html#sthash.kqA4xdF0.dpuf

[ LINK ONLY FOR REMOTE VIEWERS ONLY LIKE MADDIE THE IDIOT ]

May 1966 Dear Friends: Eckankar is the new all out approach to the expansion of

consciousness, that which gives freedom to all who can do out of the body and mind movement.

This is the freedom that every man seeks, a release from everything in this material universe,

giving us the ability and opportunity to move about in the heavenly worlds. It means that we

are not associating ourselves with the astral, mental and other matter worlds below the Soul

plane. But we are free to move about in these lower planes as we can in the spiritual worlds.

Eckankar then, is not a religion, philosophy, nor a metaphysical system but a path to God. IT

is every man's way for the Way lies within each of us. IT lies within the consciousness that

is the Soul of ev - See more at: file:///C:/Users/Sean/Downloads/LFN%20PAGES/Illuminated%20Way%20Letters%20-%20May-1966%20_%20Light%20Force%20Network.html#sthash.kqA4xdF0.dpuf

(SNIPPED)

SHABDA - Preceptor's blog

=====================

LONI WISDOM

LOGOS - Overseer: "If you have a personal issue, a concern or an admonition with an individual

it serves mutual harmony to handle it privately ... not in the court (usually of the kangaroo

genre) of public opinion. Anyone who avoids this is cowardly, and has no real desire for

harmony... It is their greed to appear 'right,' or the 'victim.'" - William Dargin1 day 13

hours ago -

See more at: file:///C:/Users/Sean/Downloads/LFN%20PAGES/Illuminated%20Way%20Letters%20-
%20May-1966%20_%20Light%20Force%20Network.html#sthash.kqA4xdF0.dpuf

B I G Y A W N

[Henosis Sage]

(correction sorry)


To the gentleman complaining about .. "To the gentleman who stole my post,..."

Rotflmao

feel free to view "the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth" here
https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!profile/alt.religion.eckankar/APn2wQfZU-Th1-F4iyrIFPjFOqJD2jh1jfDtBfwUslwTgfz5PAXZCxbQuF4esGCO-pkFwmy5dn-Q

... (shrug)

----

KINPA PROVES ... HE IS SAYING THIS

"PAUL TWITCHELL you little plagiarist-thief! You made a HUGE mistake by
stealing a privately written and copyrighted RADHASOAMI & NEW THOUGHT
BOOKS! Here is what it said without that last paragraph you wrote to
make it appear to be written by you! Say goodbye to your imagined
credibility TWITCHELL!!! This was NOT done for TEACHING educational
purposes and fair use does NOT apply!"

--- "IT'S COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT!!!"

"PAUL TWITCHELL is proven a thief, a plagiarist, AND a liar by this very
thread!"

"Fabricated "evidence" by the lying, thieving plagiarist PAUL TWITCHELL
himself....boring...no credibility OR evidence, filled with double
standards that you are blind to...can't spell very well when you've
been drinking either..."

"Awwww poor HAROLD KLEMP ....made a fool of himself yet again...nothing HE'S
claiming exists! Nice try though..."

"Let us all not forget the point of this thread.... "" Defamers,
Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks "" PAUL TWITCHELL committed plagiarism,
theft, AND lied about it, showing his TRUE colors! Then his faithful pet
HAROLD KLEMP & DOUG MARMAN came to do what PAUL TWITCHELL could not do.
Defend him by diversion ... birds of a flock as they say..."


"So only PAUL TWITCHELL is at fault for his plagiarizing but HENOSIS IS
responsible for KINPA'S COPYING COPYRIGHT BOOKS ON LIGHT FORCE NETWORK?
And then form a conspiracy with others to conceal, cover up and lie about
that fact.
Really? You run with that then! Good luck with that buddy!"

[a moment on lala land]

"Nice but irrelevant attempt at changing the subject, which was YOUR blatant
plagiarizing and lying...still haven't come up with the source for what you
CLAIM was plagiarized by me on this OLD and inaccurate DRAFT of a chapter of
my book? You'll need to do better than that, you being a PROVEN liar..."

"If TWITCHELL wrote it, why did HE include spelling mistakes? You THINK you
baited a trap, but wanted you to think that! DOUBLE TRAPPED by MY OWN &
TWITCHELL'S dishonesty!
DEFAMATION, this is the truth and we can prove that in a court of law...are
you ready? LMAO!"

for example:
1996 david lane on a.r.e. -- " Now Twitchell not only duplicates Johnson's
seasoned and nuanced style, but he also copies verbatim his
grammar/spelling mistakes. Moreover, when Johnson does quote other writers
from other "worldly" sources (read: not astrally deposited books), he
properly cites them and their respective texts. When Twitchell plagiarized
Johnson he forgot to differentiate between Johnson's own writing and
Johnson's quoted material. Thus, by this very simple blunder Twitchell
exposed the secret behind his writing: he was parroting what he had read
from The Path of the Masters and With a Great Master in India.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/ps7SGE_S65U/pFDvH6ePjSgJ


"Wrong again! PAUL TWITCHELL IS a proven liar AND a proven plagiarist now!
The date and time of the COPYRIGHT BOOKS & MAIL ORDER SERIES & DISCOURSES
prove THEY CAME OUT B4 PAUL TWITCHELL'S WRITINGS ... ALL OF THEM ... 90%
OF TWITCHELL'S BOOKS n DISCOURSES IN FACT! Suck it up!
Now that same shoe is on YOUR foot! TWITCHELL, KLEMP & MARMAN & MATT
SHARPE (his name up in lights) keep trying and lying, that's what you're
best at!"

"Plagiarism only proves plagiarism. LMAO~!!!"

"PROVE IT!!! You can't! LMAO~!!!

"Plagiarism only proves the plagiarism happened, it doesn't prove
anything else."

Oh really? How nice. :-)

[Henosis Sage]

On Tuesday, 23 June 2015 20:05:22 UTC+10, Henosis Sage wrote:

Besmirch may sound kind of funny, but it goes hand in hand with other hurtful
words like defame and slander. It can also mean to literally stain something.

So that time you tracked mud all over the new white carpet and then blamed it
on your little brother? That was a double besmirching -- dirtying the rug and
then falsely accusing a sibling." - vocabulary.com

Ratfink - "the combination of two terms used to describe the underhandedness
of someone to stress what a low down sneak they are." - urbandictionary.com

Clown - "to laugh, make fun of, or find joy in a person or event. Almost
always used in a derogatory or degrading fashion." - urbandictionary.com
schadenfreude pleasure derived by someone from another person's misfortune

Defamer - "To ruin the reputation of; libel (written) or slander (verbal).
All bullies do is defame people and make them feel inferior." Urbandictionary.com

So, if we combine those we get a BesmirchdefamerRatfinkClown or just a despicable scumbag who'll say anything to attack and intimidate another person online ... but coward who would never do it to anyone's face!

I am currently an INTENTIONAL target of a besmiratfinkdefamerclo here on a.r.e. It's a very bad experience that pushed up a volcano of angry emotional responses, some of which I didn't even know I had. Woo Hoo! Yeah, so screw U asshole!

Now where was I ....


To the non-existent pixels complaining about the: "To the gentleman who stole my post,..." well that's OK - think of your civic duty being a part of a experiment to prove a few things in pixels ..

First would be very informative to anyone interested in the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth:

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=en#!profile/alt.religion.eckankar/APn2wQfZU-Th1-F4iyrIFPjFOqJD2jh1jfDtBfwUslwTgfz5PAXZCxbQuF4esGCO-pkFwmy5dn-Q

----

So someone called KINPA PROVES by it's own words and actions and by quoting
from "private message boards" on the light force network about a claimed
example of "plagiarism" and what KINPA really thinks about people who copy
someone else's writings verbatim then make a few minor changes and republish
AS IF IT'S their own work ...

As KINPA has often pointed out Twitchell's Plagiarism proves he Plagiarised ...
So when KINPA says the following is what he really thinks, then it applies
to TWITCHELL's Plagiarism too ... which is far far worse!

This is how it goes ...

"PAUL TWITCHELL you little plagiarist-thief! You made a HUGE mistake by
stealing a privately written and copyrighted RADHASOAMI & NEW THOUGHT
BOOKS! Here is what it said without that last paragraph you wrote to
make it appear to be written by you! Say goodbye to your imagined
credibility TWITCHELL!!! This was NOT done for TEACHING educational
purposes and fair use does NOT apply!"

"IT'S COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT!!!"

"PAUL TWITCHELL is proven a thief, a plagiarist, AND a liar by this very

mountain of hard evidence!"

Instead of the "Fabricated "evidence" by the lying, thieving plagiarist

PAUL TWITCHELL himself....boring...no credibility OR evidence, filled

with double standards that HE WAS blind to... TWITCHELL can't spell
very well when HE'D been drinking either..."

"Awwww poor HAROLD KLEMP ....made a fool of himself yet again...nothing

KLEMP'S claiming exists! Nice try though..."

"Let us all not forget the point of this thread.... "" Defamers,
Besmirchers, Clowns and Ratfinks ""

PAUL TWITCHELL committed plagiarism,

theft, AND lied about it, showing his TRUE colors! Then his faithful pets

HAROLD KLEMP & DOUG MARMAN came to do what PAUL TWITCHELL could not do.
Defend him by diversion ... birds of a flock as they say..."


"So only PAUL TWITCHELL is at fault for his plagiarizing but HENOSIS IS

responsible for KINPA'S DISTRIBUTING COPYRIGHT TM BOOKS ON LIGHT FORCE NETWORK?

And then form a conspiracy with others to conceal, cover up and lie about
that fact.

Really? You run with that then! Good luck with that buddy!"

Of course, KINPA and TWITCHELL COULD HAVE SIMPLY BEEN LYING ALL ALONG
and / or delusional but were not aware of what they were doing [incompetent]
or saying - hard to tell - but the PLAGIARISM PROVES A WHOLE DOMINO EFFECT
OF CRITICALLY IMPORTANT THINGS TO HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WORLDWIDE
WHO CONTINUED TO ABANDON ECKANKAR THE SAME WAY IT'S LEADERSHIP ABANDONED
THEM FOR THE LAST 50 YEARS..... (shrug)

It's a Scam ...